Abstract
The urgency of the resuscitation and the impaired ability of the patient to make a reasonable autonomous decision both conspire against adequate consideration of the principles of medical ethics. Informed consent is usually not possible for these reasons and this leads many to consider that consent is not required for resuscitation, because resuscitation brings benefit and prevents harm and because the patient is not in a position to give or withhold consent. However, consent for resuscitation is required and the common models employed for this purpose are presumed consent or consent from a patient proxy. However, if we are to honour the principles of respect for patient autonomy, as well as beneficence and non-maleficence, when starting and continuing resuscitation we must try and achieve the best balance between benefit and harm from the patient's perspective. The concept of professional substituted judgment involves the resuscitators gathering as much information about the patient as they possibly can, including any previously expressed attitudes towards such a situation, and combining this with their acquired professional knowledge of the likely benefits and harms of the resuscitation endeavour and then exercising their moral imagination, imagining themselves as the patient, and asking "would I want this treatment?" By employing professional substituted judgment resuscitators should recognise when the balance of benefit and harm becomes unfavourable from the patient's perspective and at this point they have a moral obligation to withdraw resuscitation as they can no longer presume the patient's consent. In this way the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence and respect for patient autonomy are more favourably balanced than under other resuscitation decision making processes.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ardagh M. W. Resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: past, present and future. N Z Med J. 1996 May 10;109(1021):153–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruce-Jones P., Roberts H., Bowker L., Cooney V. Resuscitating the elderly: what do the patients want? J Med Ethics. 1996 Jun;22(3):154–159. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.3.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diem S. J., Lantos J. D., Tulsky J. A. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television. Miracles and misinformation. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 13;334(24):1578–1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199606133342406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hauswald M., Tanberg D. Out-of-hospital resuscitation preferences of emergency health care workers. Am J Emerg Med. 1993 May;11(3):221–224. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(93)90129-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hilberman M., Kutner J., Parsons D., Murphy D. J. Marginally effective medical care: ethical analysis of issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) J Med Ethics. 1997 Dec;23(6):361–367. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.6.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillips R. S., Wenger N. S., Teno J., Oye R. K., Youngner S., Califf R., Layde P., Desbiens N., Connors A. F., Jr, Lynn J. Choices of seriously ill patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: correlates and outcomes. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med. 1996 Feb;100(2):128–137. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)89450-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenfeld K. E., Wenger N. S., Phillips R. S., Connors A. F., Dawson N. V., Layde P., Califf R. M., Liu H., Lynn J., Oye R. K. Factors associated with change in resuscitation preference of seriously ill patients. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 22;156(14):1558–1564. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schonwetter R. S., Walker R. M., Solomon M., Indurkhya A., Robinson B. E. Life values, resuscitation preferences, and the applicability of living wills in an older population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Aug;44(8):954–958. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsevat J., Dawson N. V., Wu A. W., Lynn J., Soukup J. R., Cook E. F., Vidaillet H., Phillips R. S. Health values of hospitalized patients 80 years or older. HELP Investigators. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project. JAMA. 1998 Feb 4;279(5):371–375. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.5.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]