Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ethics logoLink to Journal of Medical Ethics
. 1999 Dec;25(6):463–468. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.463

Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 3. A proposal for a don't-ask-don't-tell policy.

O Muramoto 1
PMCID: PMC479294  PMID: 10635499

Abstract

Of growing concern over Jehovah's Witnesses' (JWs) refusal of blood is the intrusion of the religious organisation into its members' personal decision making about medical care. The organisation currently may apply severe religious sanctions to JWs who opt for certain forms of blood-based treatment. While the doctrine may be maintained as the unchangeable "law of God", the autonomy of individual JW patients could still be protected by the organisation modifying its current policy so that it strictly adheres to the right of privacy regarding personal medical information. The author proposes that the controlling religious organisation adopt a "don't-ask-don't-tell" policy, which assures JWs that they would neither be asked nor compelled to reveal personal medical information, either to one another or to the church organisation. This would relieve patients of the fear of breach of medical confidentiality and ensure a truly autonomous decision on blood-based treatments without fear of organisational control or sanction.

Full text

PDF
463

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Malyon D. Transfusion-free treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses: respecting the autonomous patient's motives. J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):376–381. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Malyon D. Transfusion-free treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses: respecting the autonomous patient's rights. J Med Ethics. 1998 Oct;24(5):302–307. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.5.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Muramoto O. Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 1. Should bioethical deliberation consider dissidents' views? J Med Ethics. 1998 Aug;24(4):223–230. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.4.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Muramoto O. Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 2. A novel approach based on rational non-interventional paternalism. J Med Ethics. 1998 Oct;24(5):295–301. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.5.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Muramoto O. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusions. Lancet. 1998 Sep 5;352(9130):824–824. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60725-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilcox P. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion. Lancet. 1999 Feb 27;353(9154):757–758. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)76132-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES