Abstract
The justification for advance directives is grounded in the notion that they extend patient autonomy into future states of incompetency through patient participation in decision making about end-of-life care. Four objections challenge the necessity and sufficiency of individual autonomy, perceived to be a defining feature of liberal philosophical theory, as a basis of advance care planning. These objections are that the liberal concept of autonomy (i) implies a misconception of the individual self, (ii) entails the denial of values of social justice, (iii) does not account for justifiable acts of paternalism, and (iv) does not account for the importance of personal relationships in the advance care planning process. The last objection is especially pertinent in light of recent empirical research highlighting the importance of personal relationships in advance care planning. This article examines these four objections to autonomy, and the liberal theoretical framework with which it is associated, in order to re-evaluate the philosophical basis of advance care planning. We argue that liberal autonomy (i) is not a misconceived concept as critics assume, (ii) does not entail the denial of values of social justice, (iii) can account for justifiable acts of paternalism, though it (iv) is not the best account of the value of personal relationships that arise in advance care planning. In conclusion, we suggest that liberalism is a necessary component of a theoretical framework for advance care planning but that it needs to be supplemented with theories that focus explicitly on the significance of personal relationships.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Blustein J. The family in medical decisionmaking. Hastings Cent Rep. 1993 May-Jun;23(3):6–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brock D. W. Patient Self-Determination Act. Trumping advance directives. Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Sep-Oct;21(5):S5–S6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Childress J. F., Fletcher J. C. Respect for autonomy. Hastings Cent Rep. 1994 May-Jun;24(3):34–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark P. G. Ethical dimensions of quality of life in aging: autonomy vs. collectivism in the United States and Canada. Gerontologist. 1991 Oct;31(5):631–639. doi: 10.1093/geront/31.5.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Danis M., Churchill L. R. Autonomy and the common weal. Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Jan-Feb;21(1):25–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Danis M. Following advance directives. Hastings Cent Rep. 1994 Nov-Dec;24(6):S21–S23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dresser R. Dworkin on dementia. Elegant theory, questionable policy. Hastings Cent Rep. 1995 Nov-Dec;25(6):32–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisendrath S. J., Jonsen A. R. The living will. Help or hindrance? JAMA. 1983 Apr 15;249(15):2054–2058. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emanuel Ezekiel J. A communitarian health-care package. Responsive Community. 1993 Summer;3(3):49–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardwig J. What about the family? Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Mar-Apr;20(2):5–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin D. K., Thiel E. C., Singer P. A. A new model of advance care planning: observations from people with HIV. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Jan 11;159(1):86–92. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.1.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powers Madison. Efficiency, autonomy, and communal values in health care. Yale Law Policy Rev. 1992;10(2):316–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singer P. A., Martin D. K., Lavery J. V., Thiel E. C., Kelner M., Mendelssohn D. C. Reconceptualizing advance care planning from the patient's perspective. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Apr 27;158(8):879–884. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.8.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vernon J., Griest S., Press L. Attributes of tinnitus associated with the temporomandibular joint syndrome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1992;249(2):93–94. doi: 10.1007/BF00186455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber Leonard J. The patient as citizen and consumer: socially responsible education about advance directives. Prof Ethics. 1993 Spring-Summer;2(1-2):113–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinberg Joanna K. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience. Hastings Law J. 1988 Nov;40(1):119–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zwart H. Rationing in The Netherlands: the liberal and the communitarian perspective. Health Care Anal. 1993 Jun;1(1):53–56. doi: 10.1007/BF02196971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]