Abstract
Transmembrane protein coding genes are commonly associated with human diseases. We characterized disease causing mutations and natural polymorphisms in transmembrane proteins by mapping missense genetic variations from the UniProt database on the transmembrane protein topology listed in the Human Transmembrane Proteome database. We found characteristic differences in the spectrum of amino acid changes within transmembrane regions: in the case of disease associated mutations the non-polar to non-polar and non-polar to charged amino acid changes are equally frequent. In contrast, in the case of natural polymorphisms non-polar to charged amino acid changes are rare while non-polar to non-polar changes are common. The majority of disease associated mutations result in glycine to arginine and leucine to proline substitutions. Mutations to positively charged amino acids are more common in the center of the lipid bilayer, where they cause more severe structural and functional anomalies. Our analysis contributes to the better understanding of the effect of disease associated mutations in transmembrane proteins, which can help prioritize genetic variations in personal genomic investigations.
Introduction
Completion of the Human Genome Project resulted in a significant progression in genetic research. The publication of the human reference sequence ignited several remarkable projects, such as the 1000 Genomes Project [1], which provided a comprehensive resource of human genetic variation; the Cancer Genome Atlas [2], which was launched to identify genetic mutations in distinct tumor types; or the ENCODE project [3], which was established to identify functional genomic elements. Despite the spate of data emerging from these projects, the relevance of individual variations is not fully understood [4]. Transmembrane proteins (TMPs) perform essential roles in cellular functions. Consequently, the smallest alteration in the sequence of these proteins can have severe or fatal [5–8] effect. Furthermore, these proteins participate in the communication between the cell and the environment, hence they can be potential targets of drugs. Analysis of genetic variations in the context of the 3D structure of TMPs may help efforts to distinguish disease causing mutations and natural polymorphisms. A notable example of this type of investigation was the mapping of disease associated mutations to the homology model of human ABCC6, which is responsible for pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE). In this study, significant clustering of the missense mutations was found at complex domain-domain interfaces: at the transmission interface that involves four intracellular loops and the two ABC domains as well as at the ABC-ABC interacting surfaces [9]. However, 3D structure determination of TMPs lags behind the structure determination of globular proteins since the crystallization of these proteins requires special techniques, and their size frequently limits investigations by NMR spectroscopy. Fortunately, low-level structural information such as the transmembrane topology of the proteins can be determined by various experimental techniques [10,11] and can be also predicted with high accuracy [12–15]. A previous study of 80 TMPs has shown that disease-causing glycine to arginine changes are statistically frequent in transmembrane (TM) regions [16]. There is strong evidence that these highly charged mutations can cause misfolding of TMPs, which is one of the reasons behind the dysfunction of these proteins [17]. In the case of FGFR3, the extra charge in the TM region provided by the arginine leads to a disease [18]. However, it was also shown that arginine can play a naturally essential role in the function of several TMPs, for example the voltage-gated potassium channel KvAP contains arginines in the S4 hydrophobic segment [18].
The Human Transmembrane Proteome (HTP) database is one of the most complete resources containing topology as well as 3D structural information of human TMPs [19]. This comprehensive database provides a unique opportunity to examine the distribution of missense genetic variations and the spectrum of amino acid substitutions across the topological segments of the human transmembrane proteome. In this work we analyzed the HTP to characterize disease causing mutations and polymorphisms in the context of transmembrane topology and KEGG enrichment.
Results
Genetic variations within transmembrane proteins
Genetic variations listed in the UniProt database [20] were mapped to the human transmembrane proteome. Altogether, 19513 genetic variations were identified, including 10952 polymorphisms and 8561 disease associated variants in 3153 and 642 TMPs, respectively (S1 File). This result shows that there are about five times more TMPs carrying polymorphisms than TMPs containing disease associated mutation(s). In the case of non-TMPs, we identified 26829 polymorphism and 15990 disease associated mutations within 8472 and 1552 proteins, respectively. The rate of polymorphisms is 8,76x10-3 and 4,56x10-3 per residue in the TMPs and non-TMPs, respectively. The rate of disease associated mutations is 2,57x10-2 and 1,36x10-2 per residue in the TMPs and non-TMPs, respectively. These data show the relative enrichment of disease associated mutations in TMPs, which may be explained by the reduced tolerance of TMPs to mutations.
TMPs with genetic variations have biased distribution across categories of different TM region counts
The distribution of the number of TM regions in TMPs containing polymorphisms is in good correlation with the distribution of TM regions in the whole HTP set (Fig 1). For example, the percentage of 7 TM TMPs with polymorphisms is similar to that of 7 TM TMPs in the HTP set (Fig 1). TMPs containing polymorphisms include 597 UniProt accesion IDs of TMPs containing 7 TM regions, which are unambiguously mapped to 591 unique Entrez Gene IDs using WebGestalt. About 50% of these (298) are classified as olfactory receptors by the KEGG enrichment analysis. In view of the significant variability of olfactory receptors within the human population [21,22], the high polymorphism rate in these TMPs is not surprising. As mentioned above, disease associated mutations accumulate in fewer proteins than polymorphisms, and the distribution of the number of TM segments in these two sets also shows significant differences. The relative decrease of the 7TM protein category within the disease associated mutation containing TMPs is the most noticeable difference, while there is a minor increase in other TM categories (with the exception of 1TM proteins, Fig 1). TMPs containing 10 or 12 TM regions are especially relevant since these classes mostly contain ion transport proteins with essential functions in the cell (as opposed to 7TMH TMPs determining the sense of smell). This analysis clearly shows the different occurrences of the polymorphisms and disease associated mutations in different types of TMPs.
Comparing the distribution of amino acid substitutions between polymorphisms and disease associated mutations within distinct topology segments of transmembrane proteins
Experimental determination of TMP structures has proved rather challenging [23–25]. Therefore, bioinformatics tools play an important role in the prediction and investigation of structural information. The topology of TMPs may be considered as a “low resolution structure”, which determines the position of amino acid residues relative to the membrane plane. TMPs contain intracellular, transmembrane and extracytosolic segments (a more detailed description can be found on the http://topdb.enzim.hu web page [26]). We examined the distribution of the frequency of polymorphisms and disease associated mutations within these distinct segments by normalizing the occurrences of variations to the length of the respective topological segments. Interestingly, the highest frequency of polymorphisms and disease associated mutations are found in the transmembrane regions (Fig 2). In the case of polymorphisms non-polar to non-polar mutations are the most frequent (Table 1), whereas disease associated variations are typically non-polar to charged, and non-polar to non-polar mutations (Table 2). It is well known that the α-helical structures of the TMPs consist of mostly non-polar amino acid residues, which play a fundamental role in the formation of the hydrophobic TM segments and their interaction with the lipid bilayer. Since these types of interactions are not specific, polymorphisms are frequently tolerated as long as the resulting amino acid remains non-polar. In the case of disease associated variations, non-polar to charged amino acid changes provide polarity to the TM region, which disrupt the folding of the protein [16–18]. The most common polymorphisms in the TM regions result in valine to leucine, isoleucine to valine, alanine to threonine and phenylalanine to leucine substitutions (Table 3). In contrast to these polymorphic variations, in the case of disease associated mutations, the two most abundant changes are the glycine to arginine and the leucine to proline mutations (Table 4). These substitutions can be easily explained in view of the standard genetic code table, which shows that a single nucleotide change is sufficient to change at least four codons to induce either glycine to arginine or leucine to proline change.
Table 1. Relative frequency of the various type of amino acid substitutions within the TM regions associated with polymorphisms.
% | charged | non-polar | Polar |
---|---|---|---|
Charged | 1,67±0,1 | 2,06±0,09 | 1,29±0,07 |
non-polar | 4,22±0,13 | 53,83±0,41 | 18,35±0,35 |
Polar | 2,65±0,1 | 13,09±0,23 | 2,84±0,11 |
Table 2. Relative frequency of the various type of amino acid substitutions within the TM regions associated with diseases.
% | Charged | non-polar | polar |
---|---|---|---|
charged | 3,68±0,2 | 3,86±0,15 | 3,94±0,12 |
non-polar | 22,61±0,42 | 33,09±0,24 | 12,1±0,3 |
Polar | 5,85±0,18 | 11,35±0,22 | 3,5±0,11 |
Table 3. Relative frequency of amino acid substitutions.
Polymorphisms | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | A | R | N | D | C | Q | E | G | H | I | L | K | M | F | P | S | T | W | W | V |
A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,12 | 0 | 0 | 0,31 | 0,43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,74 | 1,05 | 5,54 | 0 | 0 | 4,06 |
R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,49 | 0,55 | 0 | 0,25 | 0,37 | 0 | 0,18 | 0,06 | 0,12 | 0 | 0,18 | 0,06 | 0 | 0,31 | 0 | 0 |
N | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,06 | 0,25 | 0 | 0,31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,62 | 0,06 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
D | 0,06 | 0 | 0,25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0,12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,06 | 0 |
C | 0 | 0,55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,12 | 0 | 0,43 | 0 | 0,43 | 0,55 | 0 |
Q | 0 | 0,37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
E | 0,12 | 0 | 0 | 0,06 | 0 | 0,06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,06 |
G | 0,55 | 0,74 | 0 | 0,43 | 0,43 | 0 | 0,37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,29 | 0 | 0,12 | 0 | 0,43 |
H | 0 | 0,62 | 0,12 | 0 | 0 | 0,06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I | 0 | 0 | 0,43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,68 | 0 | 0,92 | 0,55 | 0 | 0,12 | 3,69 | 0 | 0 | 6,09 |
L | 0 | 0,37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,31 | 0 | 0 | 0,25 | 1,05 | 0 | 0 | 0,8 | 3,26 | 1,6 | 0,55 | 0 | 0,12 | 0 | 2,34 |
K | 0 | 0,25 | 0,12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M | 0 | 0,06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,05 | 0,86 | 0,18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,78 | 0 | 0 | 2,71 |
F | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,06 | 4,49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,23 | 0 | 0 | 0,31 | 0,62 |
P | 0,06 | 0,18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,06 | 0 | 0 | 0,06 | 0 | 0,8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,86 | 0,12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
S | 0,74 | 0,18 | 0,55 | 0 | 0,55 | 0 | 0 | 0,98 | 0 | 0,25 | 1,11 | 0 | 0 | 0,62 | 0,8 | 0 | 0,62 | 0,06 | 0,12 | 0 |
T | 2,71 | 0,25 | 0,18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,48 | 0 | 0,31 | 1,66 | 0 | 0,43 | 0,55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
W | 0 | 0,18 | 0 | 0 | 0,37 | 0 | 0 | 0,06 | 0 | 0 | 0,12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Y | 0 | 0 | 0,06 | 0 | 1,35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,74 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,18 | 0 | 0,18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
V | 1,78 | 0 | 0 | 0,18 | 0 | 0 | 0,25 | 0,8 | 0 | 7,01 | 2,28 | 0 | 4,37 | 0,55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 4. Relative frequency of amino acid substitutions.
Disease associated mutations | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | A | R | N | D | C | Q | E | G | H | I | L | K | M | F | P | S | T | W | W | V |
A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,39 | 0 | 0 | 0,98 | 0,46 | 0 | 0,05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,19 | 0,26 | 2,53 | 0 | 0 | 2,68 |
R | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,08 | 1,14 | 0,05 | 0,15 | 1,39 | 0 | 0,36 | 0 | 0,05 | 0 | 0,36 | 0,26 | 0 | 0,83 | 0 | 0 |
N | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,1 | 0,36 | 0 | 0,72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,77 | 0,15 | 0 | 0,21 | 0 |
D | 0 | 0 | 0,88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,15 | 0,26 | 0,15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,67 | 0,21 |
C | 0 | 1,65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,15 | 0 | 0,21 | 0 | 0,26 | 0,98 | 0 |
Q | 0 | 0,36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,05 | 0 | 0,15 | 0 | 0,1 | 0,15 | 0 | 0 | 0,21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
E | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,1 | 0 | 0,05 | 0 | 0,36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,93 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
G | 0,72 | 6,91 | 0 | 2,63 | 0,41 | 0 | 1,7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,05 | 0,05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,7 | 0 | 0,26 | 0 | 1,91 |
H | 0 | 0,77 | 0,05 | 0,05 | 0 | 0,21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,46 | 0 |
I | 0 | 0,21 | 0,83 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,26 | 0,31 | 0,41 | 0,72 | 0 | 0,31 | 0,62 | 0 | 0 | 0,67 |
L | 0 | 1,81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,26 | 0 | 0 | 0,46 | 0,21 | 0 | 0 | 0,15 | 1,14 | 5,47 | 0,46 | 0 | 0,26 | 0 | 0,88 |
K | 0 | 0 | 0,1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M | 0 | 0,67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,03 | 0,31 | 0,83 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,98 | 0 | 0 | 1,08 |
F | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,1 | 1,81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,14 | 0,05 | 0 | 0,05 | 0,36 |
P | 0,21 | 0,72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,15 | 0 | 0 | 0,1 | 0 | 1,81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,08 | 0,1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
S | 0 | 1,34 | 0,67 | 0 | 0,36 | 0 | 0 | 0,1 | 0 | 0,57 | 1,29 | 0 | 0 | 1,55 | 1,14 | 0 | 0,1 | 0,36 | 0,57 | 0 |
T | 0,46 | 1,14 | 0,41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,98 | 0 | 0,46 | 1,65 | 0 | 0,52 | 0,15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
W | 0 | 1,19 | 0 | 0 | 0,72 | 0 | 0 | 0,05 | 0 | 0 | 0,21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Y | 0 | 0 | 0,1 | 0,15 | 1,6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
V | 0,72 | 0 | 0 | 0,62 | 0 | 0 | 0,41 | 0,31 | 0 | 1,7 | 0,57 | 0 | 2,06 | 1,03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
We counted the amino acid substitutions for each topological region (polymorphisms and disease associated mutations) and compared the distributions to random sampling (S2 and S3 Files). Variations caused by the mutation of arginine residues are overrepresented in all topological segments, except within the transmembrane region where these amino acids are uncommon. This high mutability is due to the naturally occurring deamination of CpG dinucleotides in coding sequences. Polymorphisms within the TM regions are mainly apolar-to-apolar changes as shown in Table 1. These changes are highly overrepresented (S2 File) and symmetrical (e.g. valine to isoleucine and isoleucine to valine changes). In the case of disease associated mutations two prominent signatures can be identified (S3 File). First, cysteine residues are highly mutated in the extra-cytosolic region of TMPs, which can destabilize protein structure by altering disulphide bonds. The other change results in a glycine to arginine substitution within the TM region, which is characterized in more detail below.
Characterizing the glycine to arginine and leucine to proline mutations
To assess the relevance of glycine to arginine mutations, their occurrence in the transmembrane segments was compared with that of the naturally occurring arginines and polymorphisms resulting in arginine within the transmembrane regions (Fig 3). The disease associated glycine to arginine mutations were identified mostly in the center of the lipid bilayer, contrary to the naturally occurring arginines and polymorphisms, which are common towards the polar head groups of the lipid bilayer, in line with the notion that the extra charge in the depth of the lipid bilayer leads to a more severe deviation in the structure and function of the TMPs. Interestingly, naturally occurring arginine residues within TM segments can be found almost exclusively within TMPs containing 7 TM regions. Glycine to arginine mutations are frequently present in TMPs containing 10 and 12 TM regions (Fig 4). This observation suggests that arginines naturally occurring in TMPs containing 7 TM regions (mostly G protein-coupled receptors) have a dedicated role, in comparison to ion channels or ion transport proteins where similar variations result in a disease phenotype.
The leucine to proline variations are non-polar to non-polar substitutions, hence these are not providing extra charge into the TM region by the amino acid side chains. However, proline can cause major disturbances by disrupting the hydrogen bridge system of the α-helices and exposing a hydrogen bridge acceptor, which provides a partial extra charge within the lipid bilayer. Therefore, it is not surprising that the enrichment analysis revealed that TMPs containing this type of mutations are frequent among the10 and 12 TM TMPs with ion transport function. A bootstrap method performed to estimate the significance of the observed count of mutations revealed that glycine to arginine and leucine to proline mutations located in transmembrane segments significantly differ from each other. While the glycine to arginine mutation was found to be highly significant, the high count of leucine to proline mutations is the result of chance (see S2 and S3 Files).
Additionally we determined a “predictive value” for those mutations which occur frequently (more than hundred times) within the TM region (S4 File). This analysis clearly shows that the glycine to arginine changes in the membrane regions are the highest occurring disease causing mutations.
The relative frequencies of polymorphisms and disease associated mutations were further characterized by mapping their positions on available 3D structures. The distribution of the variations was evaluated along the z-axis (Fig 5). While the distribution of polymorphisms show no significant changes along the z-axis, the distribution of the relative frequencies of disease associated mutations are more abundant in the middle of the double lipid layer, similarly to the distribution of glycine to arginine variations. However, our analysis also revealed that the disease associated mutations have two other maximums close to the head groups of the lipid molecules in the cytosolic membrane leaflet (~38Å) and in the cytosolic water soluble part of TMPs (~50Å) (Fig 5).
Discussion
In this study we combined information obtained from the Human Transmembrane Proteome and UniProt databases to analyze the characteristics of naturally occurring missense genetic mutations in human TMPs. In particular, our aim was to compare the distribution of polymorphic and disease associated variations within distinct protein segments of several TMP classes.
Despite the similar distribution of polymorphisms and disease associated mutations across topological regions, the composition of the amino acid changes were found to be different. In the case of polymorphic variations, changes within the TM regions most frequently retain the apolar nature of the amino acids, whereas disease associated mutations result in characteristic apolar to charged or apolar to apolar changes. The amino acid residue substitution matrix of the human transmembrane proteome reveals that the glycine to arginine changes are primarily responsible for this phenomenon (Table 4). This makes sense, since the arginine residue provides an extra charge in the lipid bilayer, which may dramatically alter the structure and function of TMPs. Although arginines occur rarely in the membrane spanning regions of TMP, there are examples of naturally occurring arginine residues within the TM segments of TMPs. We find that arginines introduced into the membrane spanning segment by the glycine to arginine amino acid variations accumulate primarily within the interior of the lipid bilayer.
Glycine to arginine changes are more likely to be relevant when the variation affects a conserved position. For example, the p.Gly833Arg mutation causes a 78% reduction in the expression of the GRIA3 protein [27]. There are several literature reports that confirm the pathological relevance of glycine to arginine changes within the membrane regions of TMPs. For example, the p.Gly380Arg mutation in the FGFR3 protein is believed to be responsible for achondroplasia, [28]; the p.Gly185Arg change in the NRAMP2 protein results in microcytic aneamia in humans [29]; the p.Gly796Arg variation in the Band3 protein causes hereditary stomatocytosis [30]. Interestingly, this latter mutation is not listed in the major mutational databases including UniProt, Ensembl, or dbSNP. Since the UniProt classification of missense mutations represents the probability of disease association (based on theoretical considerations; see the description at the website: http://www.uniprot.org/docs/humsavar), it cannot be used for clinical or diagnostic use. Surprisingly, our analysis identified 12 glycine to arginine variations in the membrane spanning segments of TMPs that are nevertheless annotated as polymorphisms in the UniProt database (see S6 File). Analysis of the literature revealed that three of these variations result in altered phenotypes (two being disease causing, the rs34059508 and rs36209700 variants in the SLC22A1 [31] and ABCG8 [32] proteins respectively), suggesting that these variations are misclassified in the UniProt. The six remaining variations occur rarely in the human population, which may explain why a phenotype has not been identified. In fact, the erroneous annotation of sequence variations may have clinically relevant consequences. For example, a study found that 87% of patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) were originally misdiagnosed [33], and the link of an atypical variation to the disease was only revealed by whole exome sequencing [34].
The identification of relevant mutations in whole genomes has been linked to finding a needle in a haystack [35]. Today, ongoing efforts in the United States [36], Canada (the FORGE project [37,38]) and in the UK (The Rare Diseases Genomes Project of Genomics England) are sequencing thousands of genomes to identify genes that responsible for rare Mendelian diseases. In this era of genomic data deluge, when sequencing machines generate more data than researchers can analyze, the evaluation of the relevance of sequence variations is increasingly important. We suggest that low resolution structural information, such as the transmembrane topology of TMPs provides an important contribution to the evaluation of the functional relevance of genetic variations. The analysis of sequence variations in the context of topological information should help the identification of functionally relevant mutations that are more likely to be associated with a clinically relevant phenotype.
Materials and Methods
Databases
Human genetic variation data (polymorphisms and disease mutations) was obtained from the UniProt database (version 2014_10) (http://www.uniprot.org/docs/humsavar.txt, date of release: 29-Oct-2014) [39]. This release contains 69978 naturally occurring human genetic missense variations, among these 25310 are disease associated, 38030 are polymorphisms, and 6638 are unclassified respectively.
Identifiers of human non-TMPs as well as the topology information for the human TMPs were imported from the HTP database (http://htp.enzim.hu/data/database/sets/htp_all_uniprot13_03.xml) [19]. The downloaded version of HTP database consists of 14586 non-TM and 4998 TMPs.
Analyzing the human transmembrane protein variations
Genetic variations for the 4998 human α-helical TMPs as well as for the 14586 non-TMPs were imported from the UniProt database. The unclassified mutations were excluded from the analysis. All topology and variation data for TMPs were converted to the standard Bed format [40], using the UniProt ID and the position of the variant and were inserted before the original columns of the annotation. Ambiguous variations associated with multiple diseases were removed. In the case of multi-pass membrane proteins, we distinguished the terminals (regions before the first and after the last TM segments) from the loop regions and added this information to the converted files (e.g., N-terminal, Loop, C-terminal). The overlaps between the variations and the different segments of topology were determined by the intersectBed program, with the option—wo, from the Bedtools software package version v2.17.0 [41]. A step by step description of these preanalytical steps can be found in the S5 File. Using the original UniProt annotation of these variations within the different topological sites, the exact amino acid substitutions and the grouping by the polar/non-polar/charged protein property were counted by a Perl script. We counted asparagine, glutamine, serine, threonine and tyrosine as polar residues; alanine, cysteine, glycine, isoleucine, leucine, metionine, phenylalanin, proline, tryptophan and valine as non-polar residues; arginine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, histidine, and lysine as charged residues. To estimate the standard deviation of the distribution of the various substitution types, we applied a bootstrap method by selecting the 90% of variations from the disease associated and polymorphism groups by chance for ten times, and the mean and standard deviation values from the ten cases were calculated. The significance of the observed amino acid substitution matrix for the different topological sites was tested. In the case of the three topological sites (inside, membrane, outside) positions were randomly chosen for every observed mutant sites from amino acid sequences located within those regions. The observed substitution rate was used to construct a random substitution matrix for the amino acid changes. This method was applied a hundred times and the average and standard deviation values were determined to all substitutions, then the significance of the observed values was examined. The distance of the glycine to arginine variations from the center of the transmembrane region was computed by a Perl script. The enrichment analyses were determined by the WebGestalt web service [42], using the default options, and the hsapiens__entrezgene_protein-coding reference set. The EMBOSS software package version 6.3.1 was used to manipulate the raw protein sequences, and to obtain the information of protein sequences [43]. The perl scripts can be downloaded from the following web page: http://mbk.enzim.ttk.mta.hu/TMmutations.
For the investigation of the distribution of mutations in the 3D structures of TMPs, the polymorphisms and disease associated mutations were mapped onto the 3D structures of TMPs; the membrane normal was parallel with the z-axis and the zero point was in the middle of the double lipid layer. The information for the necessary rotation was taken from the PDBTM database [44]. The proteins were cut into 1Å wide slices parallel to the membrane plane, and the number of polymorphisms and disease associated mutations as well as the number of all residues were summed for each TMP having homologous structure in PDBTM database. The relative frequencies of mutations were calculated by dividing the sums by the sum of all residues in each slice.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank András Váradi for helpful discussions. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the earlier versions of this manuscript.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA, K104586), and the “Momentum” Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences to GET (LP2015-35). Funding for open access charge: Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.McVean GA, Altshuler (Co-Chair) DM, Durbin (Co-Chair) RM, Abecasis GR, Bentley DR, Chakravarti A, et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature. 2012;491: 56–65. 10.1038/nature11632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bell D, Berchuck A, Birrer M, Chien J, Cramer DW, Dao F, et al. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011. pp. 609–615. 10.1038/nature10166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dunham I, Kundaje A, Aldred SF, Collins PJ, Davis CA, Doyle F, et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489: 57–74. 10.1038/nature11247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vihinen M. No more hidden solutions in bioinformatics. Nature. 2015;521: 261–261. 10.1038/521261a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prusiner SB. Neurodegeneration in humans caused by prions. West J Med. 1994;161: 264–272. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kwok JB, Li QX, Hallupp M, Whyte S, Ames D, Beyreuther K, et al. Novel Leu723Pro amyloid precursor protein mutation increases amyloid beta42(43) peptide levels and induces apoptosis. Ann Neurol. 2000;47: 249–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tompa P, Tusnády GE, Cserzo M, Simon I. Prion protein: evolution caught en route. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98: 4431–4436. 10.1073/pnas.071308398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bockenhauer D, Feather S, Stanescu HC, Bandulik S, Zdebik AA, Reichold M, et al. Epilepsy, ataxia, sensorineural deafness, tubulopathy, and KCNJ10 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2009;360: 1960–1970. 10.1056/NEJMoa0810276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fülöp K, Barna L, Symmons O, Závodszky P, Váradi A. Clustering of disease-causing mutations on the domain-domain interfaces of ABCC6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;379: 706–709. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Van Geest M, Lolkema JS. Membrane topology and insertion of membrane proteins: search for topogenic signals. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64: 13–33. 10.1128/MMBR.64.1.13-33.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tusnády GE, Kalmár L, Simon I. TOPDB: Topology data bank of transmembrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36: 234–239. 10.1093/nar/gkm751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tusnády GE, Simon I. Principles governing amino acid composition of integral membrane proteins: application to topology prediction. J Mol Biol. 1998;283: 489–506. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Elofsson A, von Heijne G. Membrane protein structure: prediction versus reality. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76: 125–140. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.163539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bernsel A, Viklund H, Falk J, Lindahl E, von Heijne G, Elofsson A. Prediction of membrane-protein topology from first principles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105: 7177–81. 10.1073/pnas.0711151105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dobson L, Reményi I, Tusnády GE. CCTOP: a Consensus Constrained TOPology prediction web server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43: W408–W412. 10.1093/nar/gkv451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Partridge AW, Therien AG, Deber CM. Missense mutations in transmembrane domains of proteins: Phenotypic propensity of polar residues for human disease. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma. 2004;54: 648–656. 10.1002/prot.10611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ng DP, Poulsen BE, Deber CM. Membrane protein misassembly in disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012; 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hristova K, Wimley WC. A look at arginine in membranes. J Membr Biol. 2011;239: 49–56. 10.1007/s00232-010-9323-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dobson L, Reményi I, Tusnády GE. The Human Transmembrane Proteome. Biol Direct. 2015; submitted. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Consortium TU. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; gku989. 10.1093/nar/gku989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hasin-Brumshtein Y, Lancet D, Olender T. Human olfaction: from genomic variation to phenotypic diversity. Trends Genet. 2009;25: 178–184. 10.1016/j.tig.2009.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Olender T, Waszak SM, Viavant M, Khen M, Ben-Asher E, Reyes A, et al. Personal receptor repertoires: olfaction as a model. BMC Genomics. 2012;13: 414 10.1186/1471-2164-13-414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Newstead S, Ferrandon S, Iwata S. Rationalizing alpha-helical membrane protein crystallization. Protein Sci. 2008;17: 466–472. 10.1110/ps.073263108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cherezov V. Lipidic cubic phase technologies for membrane protein structural studies. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011;21: 559–566. 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fromme P, Spence JCH. Femtosecond nanocrystallography using X-ray lasers for membrane protein structure determination. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011;21: 509–516. 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dobson L, Langó T, Reményi I, Tusnády GE. Expediting topology data gathering for the TOPDB database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 10.1093/nar/gku1119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu Y, Arai AC, Rumbaugh G, Srivastava AK, Turner G, Hayashi T, et al. Mutations in ionotropic AMPA receptor 3 alter channel properties and are associated with moderate cognitive impairment in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104: 18163–18168. 10.1073/pnas.0708699104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shiang R, Thompson LM, Zhu YZ, Church DM, Fielder TJ, Bocian M, et al. Mutations in the transmembrane domain of FGFR3 cause the most common genetic form of dwarfism, achondroplasia. Cell. 1994;78: 335–342. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90302-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Su MA, Trenor CC, Fleming JC, Fleming MD, Andrews NC. The G185R mutation disrupts function of the iron transporter Nramp2. Blood. 1998;92: 2157–2163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Iolascon A, De Falco L, Borgese F, Esposito MR, Avvisati RA, Izzo P, et al. A novel erythroid anion exchange variant (Gly796Arg) of hereditary stomatocytosis associated with dyserythropoiesis. Haematologica. 2009;94: 1049–1059. 10.3324/haematol.2008.002873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shu Y, Leabman MK, Feng B, Mangravite LM, Huang CC, Stryke D, et al. Evolutionary conservation predicts function of variants of the human organic cation transporter, OCT1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 5902–7. 10.1073/pnas.0730858100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lu K, Lee MH, Hazard S, Brooks-Wilson A, Hidaka H, Kojima H, et al. Two genes that map to the STSL locus cause sitosterolemia: genomic structure and spectrum of mutations involving sterolin-1 and sterolin-2, encoded by ABCG5 and ABCG8, respectively. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69: 278–290. 10.1086/321294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kitterman JA, Kantanie S, Rocke DM, Kaplan FS. Iatrogenic harm caused by diagnostic errors in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Pediatrics. 2005;116: e654–e661. 10.1542/peds.2005-0469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu H, Sawyer SL, Gos M, Grynspan D, Issa K, Ramphal R, et al. Atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva diagnosed by whole-exome sequencing. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2015;167: 1337–1341. 10.1002/ajmg.a.36969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.MacArthur DG, Tyler-Smith C. Loss-of-function variants in the genomes of healthy humans. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19: R125–R130. 10.1093/hmg/ddq365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bamshad MJ, Shendure JA, Valle D, Hamosh A, Lupski JR, Gibbs RA, et al. The Centers for Mendelian Genomics: A new large-scale initiative to identify the genes underlying rare Mendelian conditions. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2012;158 A: 1523–1525. 10.1002/ajmg.a.35470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Boycott KM, Vanstone MR, Bulman DE, MacKenzie AE. Rare-disease genetics in the era of next-generation sequencing: discovery to translation. Nat Rev Genet. Nature Publishing Group; 2013;14: 681–691. 10.1038/nrg3555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Beaulieu CL, Majewski J, Schwartzentruber J, Samuels ME, Fernandez BA, Bernier FP, et al. FORGE Canada consortium: Outcomes of a 2-year national rare-disease gene-discovery project. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94: 809–817. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.The UniProt Consortium. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42: D191–D198. 10.1093/nar/gkt1140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12: 996–1006. 10.1101/gr.229102 Article published online before print in May 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26: 841–842. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang B, Kirov S, Snoddy J. WebGestalt: an integrated system for exploring gene sets in various biological contexts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33: W741–W748. 10.1093/nar/gki475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000;16: 276–277. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kozma D, Simon I, Tusnády GE. PDBTM: Protein Data Bank of transmembrane proteins after 8 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41: D524–529. 10.1093/nar/gks1169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.