Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2016 Mar 16;5:F1000 Faculty Rev-364. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7595.1

Nanoparticle-Based Antimicrobials: Surface Functionality is Critical

Akash Gupta 1, Ryan F Landis 1, Vincent M Rotello 1,a
PMCID: PMC4798155  PMID: 27006760

Abstract

Bacterial infections cause 300 million cases of severe illness each year worldwide. Rapidly accelerating drug resistance further exacerbates this threat to human health. While dispersed (planktonic) bacteria represent a therapeutic challenge, bacterial biofilms present major hurdles for both diagnosis and treatment. Nanoparticles have emerged recently as tools for fighting drug-resistant planktonic bacteria and biofilms. In this review, we present the use of nanoparticles as active antimicrobial agents and drug delivery vehicles for antibacterial therapeutics. We further focus on how surface functionality of nanomaterials can be used to target both planktonic bacteria and biofilms.

Keywords: Antimicrobials, nanoparticles, bacteria, biofilms, antibacterial

Introduction

Bacterial infections cause 300 million cases of severe illness every year with 16 million, including 2 million children, killed 1. Infections caused by multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria greatly increase the threat generated by bacterial infections. In addition to acute illness, bacterial infections can result in chronic disease states, where bacterial colonization develops into a biofilm, a complex three-dimensional bacterial community 2. The complexity of the biofilm matrix makes biofilm-associated diseases more clinically challenging than planktonic bacteria in both diagnosis and treatment 3. Finally, there has been a significant decrease in the number of approved antibiotics recently, contributing to the urgency of developing alternative antimicrobial agents 4.

Nanoparticles (NPs) are emerging as weapons in our antimicrobial arsenal owing to their unique nanoscale physical and chemical properties 5, 6. For example, NP size is commensurate with biomolecular and bacterial cellular systems, providing a platform where nanomaterial-bacteria interactions can be fine-tuned through appropriate surface functionalization 7, 8. Moreover, the high surface area to volume ratio of nanomaterials enables high loading of therapeutics, with promising synergy arising from multivalent interactions. NPs provide a way to address the common mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, such as permeability regulation 9, 10, multi-drug efflux pumps 11, antibiotic degradation 12, 13, and target site binding affinity mutations 14. NPs also provide alternative pathways to combat biofilm/MDR infections and significantly lower bacteria resistance over time 1517. NPs utilize multiple mechanisms to kill bacteria, making it difficult for them to adapt existing strategies for developing resistance 18. Following this strategy, several NP-based systems have been developed to improve antimicrobial efficacy ( Figure 1) 1921. In this review, we will focus on recent studies that use engineered NPs as active therapeutic agents or as delivery vehicles to transport drugs to the site of infection.

Figure 1. Nanoparticles as scaffolds and building blocks for antimicrobial agents.

Figure 1.

Nanoparticle interactions with bacteria and biofilms

Engineering the interactions of nanomaterials with bacteria/biofilm matrices plays a crucial role in designing NP-based antimicrobial systems. The surface properties of NPs are highly versatile and can be easily modulated through ligand engineering to generate particles with new and emergent properties 2224. These NPs can be utilized for not only therapeutic applications but also fundamental studies on bacterial behavior. In early studies of NP-microbe interactions, Rotello and co-workers showed that cationic gold NPs (AuNPs) possessed toxicity against bacteria 25. Subsequently, they demonstrated that hydrophobic, cationic AuNPs developed spatiotemporal aggregate patterns on the bacterial surface. The aggregate patterns depended upon the nature of the bacteria as well as the size of the NPs. In this work, 6 nm AuNPs were found to have low toxicity, whereas 2 nm AuNPs rapidly lysed Bacillus subtilis but not Escherichia coli 26. In a similar study, Feng and co-workers further corroborated the fact that NP and bacterial surface chemistry impact NP-bacteria interactions and toxicity. They reported that the NPs with maximal cationic charge associated most significantly with the bacterial surfaces, inducing the greatest membrane damage and toxicity 27. These studies provide valuable insight into designing therapeutic constructs for planktonic bacteria treatment.

Bacteria can self-colonize to form biofilms. Biofilm infections are difficult to treat because the extracellular matrix produced by bacteria creates a microenvironment within the host. This allows bacteria to evade immune responses and dramatically increase resistance to traditional antibiotic treatments 28, 29. The complex architecture, dynamics, and composition of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in the matrix are profoundly responsible for the low penetration of therapeutic agents 30. Diffusion of therapeutics inside the biofilm can be affected by several genetic and physiological heterogeneities such as the hydrophobicity of bacterial cell walls 31. Hence, fundamentally understanding the interactions between NPs and complex biofilm matrices is crucial in designing materials for biofilm treatment.

The penetration and deposition of NPs within the biofilms are key components for the design of biofilm therapeutics. Peulen and Wilkinson reported that the penetration ability of NPs decreased inversely to their size due to small pore sizes within biofilms 32. Furthermore, NP deposition inside the biofilms is largely dependent upon the electrostatic interaction as well as the homogeneity of the charges across the biofilm surface. In a related study, Rotello and co-workers provided further insight on the penetration ability of the NPs inside the biofilms. They demonstrated that the neutral and anionic quantum dots (QDs) did not show any penetration inside the biofilms, while cationic QDs were widely distributed throughout the biofilm. Furthermore, cationic QDs with hydrophobic terminal groups were found inside the bacterial cells, whereas their hydrophilic counterparts remained in the EPS matrix of the biofilm ( Figure 2) 33.

Figure 2. Surface design controls penetration ability of nanoparticles.

Figure 2.

a) Quantum dots used in study. b) Micrographs of microtomed slices of the biofilm showing no penetration by anionic and neutral particles and efficient infiltration by cationic quantum dots 33.

Nanoparticles as active antimicrobial agents

NPs provide multiple attributes that facilitate the development of unique antimicrobial strategies 34, 35. NPs can interact with and penetrate bacterial cells with unique bacteriostatic and bactericidal mechanisms 36. For example, possessing slightly larger diameters than drug efflux pumps, NPs can potentially reduce efflux-mediated extrusion 37, 38. Exploiting these characteristic properties, several NP-based systems have been employed for antimicrobial applications. Xu and co-workers demonstrated enhanced in vitro antibacterial activities of vancomycin-capped AuNPs (Au-Van) against vancomycin-resistant enterococci and E. coli strains 39. Similarly, Feldheim and co-workers demonstrated that antimicrobial activity of NPs functionalized with non-antibiotic molecules depended upon their composition on the surface 40. These studies indicate that modulating NP surfaces exhibits great potential for antimicrobial therapy. However, further studies on how NP surface functionality modulates antimicrobial activity can provide valuable information for future NP-based antimicrobial agents.

In a recent study, the Rotello group reported a strategy to combat MDR bacteria by engineering the ligands on NP surfaces. Cationic and hydrophobic functionalized AuNPs effectively suppressed the growth of 11 clinical MDR isolates at low concentrations ( Figure 3). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) observed for these systems with most bacteria strains was 16 nM. Moreover, bacteria strains did not develop resistance against NPs, even after 20 passages at sub-MIC concentrations, which is far beyond that of traditional antibiotics 41. Overall, this study provides an excellent starting platform to design antibacterial therapeutics in future studies.

Figure 3. Functionalized gold nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents.

Figure 3.

a) Nanoparticles studied, featuring 2 nm gold cores. b) Toxicity of nanoparticles to a laboratory Escherichia coli strain. c) Minimum inhibitory concentrations of nanoparticle 3 against multi-drug-resistant bacteria 41.

The antibacterial activity of silver has been well established. High surface area and concomitant increase in dissolution rate are key to its use in silver-based antimicrobials, where free Ag + ions are the active agents 42. However, they face certain shortcomings, such as high toxicity to mammalian cells and limited penetration in biofilm matrices 43, 44. Recent studies have focused on countering these issues by using inherent NP properties and surface functionalization as their toolkit. For example, Mahmoudi and co-workers developed silver ring-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs (SPIONS) with ligand gaps that demonstrated high antimicrobial activity and remarkable compatibility with healthy cells. Additionally, these NPs exhibited enhanced activity against biofilm infections due to deeper penetration under an external magnetic field 45.

Graphene NPs 46, AuNPs 47, and carbon nanotubes 48 possess photothermal properties that can be utilized to design therapeutic agents. These nanomaterials absorb light (700–1100 nm) and release heat. Ling and co-workers designed graphene-based photothermal NPs that captured and killed Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli bacteria upon near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation. In this approach, graphene oxide was reduced and functionalized with magnetic NPs (MRGO). These NPs were functionalized with glutaraldehyde (GA) to induce excellent crosslinking properties with Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria ( Figure 4). Rapid and effective killing of 99% of both bacterial species was achieved upon NIR irradiation 49.

Figure 4. Schematic representation of antibacterial photothermal treatment by mildly reduced graphene oxide functionalized with glutaraldehyde.

Figure 4.

Nanoparticles as drug delivery vehicles for antibacterial therapy

Bacterial infections are able to evade antibiotic treatment through reduced bactericidal concentration or reduced antimicrobial activity of therapeutic agents at the site of infection 50, 51. Localized delivery of the drugs/antimicrobials can increase their therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, NPs can serve as promising drug delivery vehicles owing to their tunable surface functionality, biocompatibility, and high drug loading capacity 17.

NPs such as mesoporous silica possess a uniquely large surface area and tunable pore size that make them promising candidates for designing drug delivery vehicles 52. For example, Schoenfisch and co-workers designed amine-functionalized silica NPs that were able to readily penetrate and eradicate pathogenic biofilms through rapid nitric oxide release 53. Similarly, silica NPs have been fabricated as scaffolds for silver NP (AgNP) release 54. Using NPs for controlled antimicrobial release can markedly improve their biocompatibility with mammalian cells and mitigate their hazardous environmental impact 5557. In one such study, biodegradable lignin-core NPs (EbNPs) infused with silver ions were proposed as greener alternatives to AgNPs. EbNPs were coated with cationic polyelectrolytes and loaded with Ag + ions. These NPs exhibited broad-spectrum biocidal action against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria at lower Ag + ion concentrations than conventional AgNPs 58.

Therapeutic selectivity is critical when designing effective drug delivery vehicles. Triggered release of antimicrobials from these nanocarriers can be an alternative strategy to diminish their undesirable side effects 59, 60. In one particular study, Langer and co-workers designed PLGA-PLH-PEG NPs as a carrier to deliver vancomycin to bacterial cells, exploiting their localized acidity. PLGA-PLH-PEG NPs demonstrated high binding affinity to bacterial cells at pH 6.0 as compared to 7.4. Vancomycin-encapsulated NPs exhibited a 1.3-fold increase in the MIC against S. aureus as compared to 2.0-fold and 2.3-fold for free and PLGA-PEG-encapsulated vancomycin, respectively 61. In a similar study, pH-responsive NPs were used to deliver hydrophobic drugs to biofilm moieties. Polymeric NPs used in this study consisted of a cationic outer shell to bind with the EPS matrix and a pH-responsive hydrophobic inner shell to release encapsulated farnesol molecules on demand. These scaffolds resulted in a 2-fold increase in efficacy in the treatment of biofilms as compared to the drug alone 62.

Apart from acidic microenvironments, NPs can be designed to trigger antibiotic release upon exposure to bacterial toxins. For example, Zhang and co-workers designed AuNP-stabilized phospholipid liposomes (AuChi-liposomes) that respond to bacterial toxins. Chitosan-functionalized AuNPs were adsorbed on the liposomal surfaces to provide stability and prevent undesirable antibiotic leakage. In the presence of α-toxin-secreting S. aureus bacteria, AuChi-liposomes released vancomycin that effectively inhibited their growth 63.

Cationic NPs exhibit excellent penetration ability in biofilms 64. Moreover, they can self-assemble at the oil-water interfaces to generate nanocapsules 65. Combining these two characteristic features, Rotello and co-workers generated a highly effective therapeutic system for the treatment of bacterial biofilm infections. Peppermint oil and cinnamaldehyde were chosen as the therapeutic oil template, owing to their inherent antimicrobial nature, in combination with amine-functionalized cationic silica NPs that stabilized the oil-water interface to generate nanocapsules (CP-caps) ( Figure 5). These capsules were further stabilized by the formation of hydrophobic Schiff bases upon reacting with cinnamaldehyde. The cationic NPs enabled the capsules to readily penetrate the biofilms and release the antimicrobial oils to eradicate the biofilm infections. Moreover, the therapeutic selectivity of CP-caps was tested on a biofilm-fibroblast cell co-culture model. These studies showed effective biofilm infection eradication with simultaneous growth enhancement of fibroblast cells 66.

Figure 5. Nanoparticle-stabilized capsules for treatment of biofilm infections.

Figure 5.

a) Fabrication of capsules. b) Efficacy of cinnamaldehyde dissolved in peppermint oil capsule (CP-Cap) and controls against a clinical isolate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. c) Toxicity of CP-Cap against Escherichia coli cells while enhancing fibroblast viability 66.

High therapeutic selectivity makes these capsules useful antimicrobial agents for topical administration. Use of these nanomaterials systemically, however, requires an understanding of NP pharmacokinetics (PK) and biodistribution (BD). The PK and BD properties of NPs depend on several factors such as their size, shape, and surface functionalization 67, 68. Apart from their physiochemical characteristics, the administration route of NPs likewise determines their systemic or local effect. For example, intravenous injection is used for targeting the liver and spleen, whereas mucoadhesive NPs are used for oral and nasal drug delivery 69. Similarly, uptake and elimination of NPs in cells/tissues are dependent upon their physiochemical properties 70. For example, cationic NPs have higher uptake and slower rate of exocytosis in cells as compared to their anionic counterparts 25, 71. Hence, evaluating the PK behavior of the current antimicrobial systems is important for their translation into the clinic.

Conclusion

NPs provide a versatile platform in designing materials for antimicrobial therapy. Tunable surface functionality and multivalency makes them promising candidates to target planktonic bacteria. Moreover, excellent biofilm penetration enhances their activity towards a range of biofilm-based infections. NP-based antimicrobial agents can be readily used for ex vivo applications such as sterilizers for surfaces and devices. The most accessible target in the near future includes the topical applications of NP-based systems for wound healing. However, further studies at the fundamental, biological, and pharmacological level are required to enable systemic administration of these antimicrobials. In conclusion, NPs have offered promising avenues to design effective next-generation therapeutics against bacterial threats.

Abbreviations

AgNP, silver nanoparticle; AuChi-liposomes, AuNP stabilized phospholipid liposomes; AuNPs, gold nanoparticles; Au-Van, vancomycin-capped AuNPs; CP-caps, cinnamaldehyde dissolved in peppermint oil capsules; EbNPs, lignin-core nanoparticles; EPS, extracellular polymeric substances; GA, glutaraldehyde; MDR, multi-drug resistance; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MRGO, mildly reduced graphene oxide functionalized with magnetic nanoparticles; NIR, near-infrared; NPs, nanoparticles; PK, pharmacokinetics; PLGA-PLH-PEG, poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid)-b-poly(L-histidine)-b-poly-(ethylene glycol); QDs, quantum dots; SPIONS, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.

Editorial Note on the Review Process

F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version).

The referees who approved this article are:

  • Charles Flexner, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

  • Marco Siccardi, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health (GM077173) and the National Science Foundation (CHE- 1307021).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; referees: 2 approved]

References

  • 1. Prüss A, Kay D, Fewtrell L, et al. : Estimating the burden of disease from water, sanitation, and hygiene at a global level. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(5):537–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, et al. : Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1987;41:435–64. 10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.002251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP: Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999;284(5418):1318–22. 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Spellberg B, Powers JH, Brass EP, et al. : Trends in antimicrobial drug development: implications for the future. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(9):1279–86. 10.1086/420937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. De M, Ghosh PS, Rotello VM: Applications of Nanoparticles in Biology. Adv Mater. 2008;20(22):4225–41. 10.1002/adma.200703183 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Davis ME, Chen ZG, Shin DM: Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(9):771–82. 10.1038/nrd2614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jiang Z, Le ND, Gupta A, et al. : Cell surface-based sensing with metallic nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(13):4264–74. 10.1039/c4cs00387j [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Daniel MC, Astruc D: Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev. 2004;104(1):293–346. 10.1021/cr030698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK: Colistin: the revival of polymyxins for the management of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(9):1333–41. 10.1086/429323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cui L, Iwamoto A, Lian JQ, et al. : Novel mechanism of antibiotic resistance originating in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(2):428–38. 10.1128/AAC.50.2.428-438.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Li XZ, Nikaido H: Efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria. Drugs. 2004;64(2):159–204. 10.2165/00003495-200464020-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Livermore DM: beta-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8(4):557–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Davies J, Wright GD: Bacterial resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Trends Microbiol. 1997;5(6):234–40. 10.1016/S0966-842X(97)01033-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Courvalin P: Vancomycin resistance in gram-positive cocci. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(Suppl 1):S25–34. 10.1086/491711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hajipour MJ, Fromm KM, Ashkarran AA, et al. : Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(10):499–511. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Miller KP, Wang L, Benicewicz BC, et al. : Inorganic nanoparticles engineered to attack bacteria. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(21):7787–807. 10.1039/c5cs00041f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Huh AJ, Kwon YJ: "Nanoantibiotics": a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era. J Control Release. 2011;156(2):128–45. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Chopra I: The increasing use of silver-based products as antimicrobial agents: a useful development or a cause for concern? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59(4):587–90. 10.1093/jac/dkm006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jones N, Ray B, Ranjit KT, et al. : Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;279(1):71–6. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.01012.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B: Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;275(1):177–82. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Simon-Deckers A, Loo S, Mayne-L'hermite M, et al. : Size-, composition- and shape-dependent toxicological impact of metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes toward bacteria. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(21):8423–9. 10.1021/es9016975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wang L, Gupta A, Rotello VM: Nanomaterials for the Treatment of Bacterial Biofilms. ACS Infect Dis. 2016;2(1):3–4. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Moyano DF, Rotello VM: Nano meets biology: structure and function at the nanoparticle interface. Langmuir. 2011;27(17):10376–85. 10.1021/la2004535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zhao Y, Tian Y, Cui Y, et al. : Small molecule-capped gold nanoparticles as potent antibacterial agents that target Gram-negative bacteria. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(35):12349–56. 10.1021/ja1028843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Goodman CM, McCusker CD, Yilmaz T, et al. : Toxicity of gold nanoparticles functionalized with cationic and anionic side chains. Bioconjug Chem. 2004;15(4):897–900. 10.1021/bc049951i [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hayden SC, Zhao G, Saha K, et al. : Aggregation and interaction of cationic nanoparticles on bacterial surfaces. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(16):6920–3. 10.1021/ja301167y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Feng ZV, Gunsolus IL, Qiu TA, et al. : Impacts of gold nanoparticle charge and ligand type on surface binding and toxicity to Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Chem Sci. 2015;6(9):5186–96. 10.1039/C5SC00792E [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 28. Römling U, Balsalobre C: Biofilm infections, their resilience to therapy and innovative treatment strategies. J Intern Med. 2012;272(6):541–61. 10.1111/joim.12004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Stewart PS, Costerton JW: Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001;358(9276):135–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Daddi Oubekka S, Briandet R, Fontaine-Aupart MP, et al. : Correlative time-resolved fluorescence microscopy to assess antibiotic diffusion-reaction in biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(6):3349–58. 10.1128/AAC.00216-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Habimana O, Steenkeste K, Fontaine-Aupart MP, et al. : Diffusion of nanoparticles in biofilms is altered by bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(1):367–8. 10.1128/AEM.02163-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 32. Peulen TO, Wilkinson KJ: Diffusion of nanoparticles in a biofilm. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(8):3367–73. 10.1021/es103450g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 33. Li X, Yeh YC, Giri K, et al. : Control of nanoparticle penetration into biofilms through surface design. Chem Commun (Camb). 2015;51(2):282–5. 10.1039/c4cc07737g [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Peer D, Karp JM, Hong S, et al. : Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2(12):751–60. 10.1038/nnano.2007.387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Mout R, Moyano DF, Rana S, et al. : Surface functionalization of nanoparticles for nanomedicine. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(7):2539–44. 10.1039/c2cs15294k [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Seil JT, Webster TJ: Antimicrobial applications of nanotechnology: methods and literature. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:2767–81. 10.2147/IJN.S24805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Bresee J, Bond CM, Worthington RJ, et al. : Nanoscale structure-activity relationships, mode of action, and biocompatibility of gold nanoparticle antibiotics. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(14):5295–300. 10.1021/ja408505n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Higgins MK, Bokma E, Koronakis E, et al. : Structure of the periplasmic component of a bacterial drug efflux pump. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(27):9994–9. 10.1073/pnas.0400375101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gu H, Ho PL, Tong E, et al. : Presenting Vancomycin on Nanoparticles to Enhance Antimicrobial Activities. Nano Lett. 2003;3(9):1261–3. 10.1021/nl034396z [DOI] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 40. Bresee J, Maier KE, Boncella AE, et al. : Growth inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus by mixed monolayer gold nanoparticles. Small. 2011;7(14):2027–31. 10.1002/smll.201100420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 41. Li X, Robinson SM, Gupta A, et al. : Functional gold nanoparticles as potent antimicrobial agents against multi-drug-resistant bacteria. ACS Nano. 2014;8(10):10682–6. 10.1021/nn5042625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Sharma VK, Yngard RA, Lin Y: Silver nanoparticles: green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;145(1–2):83–96. 10.1016/j.cis.2008.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hussain SM, Hess KL, Gearhart JM, et al. : In vitro toxicity of nanoparticles in BRL 3A rat liver cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2005;19(7):975–83. 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Fabrega J, Renshaw JC, Lead JR: Interactions of silver nanoparticles with Pseudomonas putida biofilms. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(23):9004–9. 10.1021/es901706j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Mahmoudi M, Serpooshan V: Silver-coated engineered magnetic nanoparticles are promising for the success in the fight against antibacterial resistance threat. ACS Nano. 2012;6(3):2656–64. 10.1021/nn300042m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 46. Sherlock SP, Tabakman SM, Xie L, et al. : Photothermally enhanced drug delivery by ultrasmall multifunctional FeCo/graphitic shell nanocrystals. ACS Nano. 2011;5(2):1505–12. 10.1021/nn103415x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Zharov VP, Mercer KE, Galitovskaya EN, et al. : Photothermal nanotherapeutics and nanodiagnostics for selective killing of bacteria targeted with gold nanoparticles. Biophys J. 2006;90(2):619–27. 10.1529/biophysj.105.061895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Kim JW, Shashkov EV, Galanzha EI, et al. : Photothermal antimicrobial nanotherapy and nanodiagnostics with self-assembling carbon nanotube clusters. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(7):622–34. 10.1002/lsm.20534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Wu MC, Deokar AR, Liao JH, et al. : Graphene-based photothermal agent for rapid and effective killing of bacteria. ACS Nano. 2013;7(2):1281–90. 10.1021/nn304782d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 50. Levy SB, Marshall B: Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nat Med. 2004;10(12 Suppl):S122–9. 10.1038/nm1145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Kohanski MA, DePristo MA, Collins JJ: Sublethal antibiotic treatment leads to multidrug resistance via radical-induced mutagenesis. Mol Cell. 2010;37(3):311–20. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 52. Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Roth WJ, et al. : Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature. 1992;359:710–2. 10.1038/359710a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Hetrick EM, Shin JH, Paul HS, et al. : Anti-biofilm efficacy of nitric oxide-releasing silica nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2009;30(14):2782–9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 54. Tian Y, Qi J, Zhang W, et al. : Facile, one-pot synthesis, and antibacterial activity of mesoporous silica nanoparticles decorated with well-dispersed silver nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(15):12038–45. 10.1021/am5026424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Ahamed M, Alsalhi MS, Siddiqui MK: Silver nanoparticle applications and human health. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411(23–24):1841–8. 10.1016/j.cca.2010.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Fabrega J, Luoma SN, Tyler CR, et al. : Silver nanoparticles: behaviour and effects in the aquatic environment. Environ Int. 2011;37(2):517–31. 10.1016/j.envint.2010.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Anastas P, Eghbali N: Green chemistry: principles and practice. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39(1):301–12. 10.1039/b918763b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Richter AP, Brown JS, Bharti B, et al. : An environmentally benign antimicrobial nanoparticle based on a silver-infused lignin core. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10(9):817–23. 10.1038/nnano.2015.141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 59. Meers P, Neville M, Malinin V, et al. : Biofilm penetration, triggered release and in vivo activity of inhaled liposomal amikacin in chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(4):859–68. 10.1093/jac/dkn059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 60. Kim CS, Duncan B, Creran B, et al. : Triggered Nanoparticles as Therapeutics. Nano Today. 2013;8(4):439–47. 10.1016/j.nantod.2013.07.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Radovic-Moreno AF, Lu TK, Puscasu VA, et al. : Surface charge-switching polymeric nanoparticles for bacterial cell wall-targeted delivery of antibiotics. ACS Nano. 2012;6(5):4279–87. 10.1021/nn3008383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 62. Horev B, Klein MI, Hwang G, et al. : pH-activated nanoparticles for controlled topical delivery of farnesol to disrupt oral biofilm virulence. ACS Nano. 2015;9(3):2390–404. 10.1021/nn507170s [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 63. Pornpattananangkul D, Zhang L, Olson S, et al. : Bacterial toxin-triggered drug release from gold nanoparticle-stabilized liposomes for the treatment of bacterial infection. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(11):4132–9. 10.1021/ja111110e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
  • 64. Giri K, Yepes LR, Duncan B, et al. : Targeting bacterial biofilms via surface engineering of gold nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2015;5(128):105551–9. 10.1039/C5RA16305F [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Duncan B, Landis RF, Jerri HA, et al. : Hybrid organic-inorganic colloidal composite 'sponges' via internal crosslinking. Small. 2015;11(11):1302–9. 10.1002/smll.201401753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Duncan B, Li X, Landis RF, et al. : Nanoparticle-Stabilized Capsules for the Treatment of Bacterial Biofilms. ACS Nano. 2015;9(8):7775–82. 10.1021/acsnano.5b01696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Li SD, Huang L: Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of nanoparticles. Mol Pharm. 2008;5(4):496–504. 10.1021/mp800049w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Arvizo RR, Miranda OR, Moyano DF, et al. : Modulating pharmacokinetics, tumor uptake and biodistribution by engineered nanoparticles. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24374. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Cheng CJ, Tietjen GT, Saucier-Sawyer JK, et al. : A holistic approach to targeting disease with polymeric nanoparticles. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14(4):239–47. 10.1038/nrd4503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Longmire M, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H: Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: considerations and caveats. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2008;3(5):703–17. 10.2217/17435889.3.5.703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Kim CS, Le ND, Xing Y, et al. : The role of surface functionality in nanoparticle exocytosis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3(8):1200–2. 10.1002/adhm.201400001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

RESOURCES