Abstract
Patients with biallelic truncating mutations in PALB2 have a severe form of Fanconi anaemia (FA-N), with a predisposition for developing embryonal-type tumours in infancy. Here we describe two unusual patients from a single family, carrying biallelic PALB2 mutations, one truncating, c.1676_1677delAAinsG;(p.Gln559ArgfsTer2), and the second, c.2586+1G>A; p.Thr839_Lys862del resulting in an in frame skip of exon 6 (24 amino acids). Strikingly, the affected individuals did not exhibit the severe developmental defects typical of FA-N patients and initially presented with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The expressed p.Thr839_Lys862del mutant PALB2 protein retained the ability to interact with BRCA2, previously unreported in FA-N patients. There was also a large increased chromosomal radiosensitivity following irradiation in G2 and increased sensitivity to mitomycin C. Although patient cells were unable to form Rad51 foci following exposure to either DNA damaging agent, U2OS cells, in which the mutant PALB2 with in frame skip of exon 6 was induced, did show recruitment of Rad51 to foci following damage. We conclude that a very mild form of FA-N exists arising from a hypomorphic PALB2 allele.
Author Summary
PALB2 is a protein that creates a molecular bridge that promotes the recruitment of Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) proteins BRCA1, BRCA2 and Rad51 to sites of DNA damage. Cells with functional loss of PALB2 show a defect in HRR and are characterized by an increased number of spontaneous chromosome breaks and hypersensitivity to cross-linking agents. Typically, inherited mutations in PALB2 are associated with a severe Fanconi Anaemia phenotype. Here we describe for the first time the effect of biallelic mutations of PALB2 in which one hypomorphic allele resulted in a low level of expression of the mutant PALB2 protein with some retained function, as shown by its interaction with BRCA2, as well as its ability to facilitate Rad51 focus formation following damage. This resulted in a considerably milder clinical phenotype with increased longevity compared with biallelic PALB2 null patients and an altered tumour spectrum towards development of lymphoid malignancies.
Introduction
BRCA2, PALB2, BRCA1, Rad51 and the Rad51 paralogs form the principal constituents of the homologous recombination (HR) machinery utilised by the cell not only to repair deleterious DNA lesions, such as DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in an error-free manner, but also to stabilise, protect and restart damaged replication forks. PALB2 [1] functions as a molecular bridge by simultaneously binding both BRCA1 and BRCA2 via its N-terminal coiled-coil domain and C-terminal WD repeats respectively [2–4]. It has been proposed that BRCA1 plays a role in targeting the BRCA2-Rad51 recombination complex to sites of DNA damage directly through its ability to bind PALB2 [3]. However, since PALB2 and Rad51 foci are not completely ablated in the absence of BRCA1 and PALB2 has been shown to bind chromatin directly through its ChAM domain [5], it is likely that PALB2 acts as an essential conduit linking the pro-resection, anti-recombinogenic and the cell cycle checkpoint activities of the various known BRCA1 containing complexes (typified by the presence of RAP80, MERIT40, Abraxas, BRCC36/45, CtIP or FANCJ) with the recombination machinery [6].
It has been known for some time that heterozygosity for a germline mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 strongly predispose women to the development of breast and/or ovarian cancer. More recently, heterozygosity for a germline mutation in PALB2 [7], RAD51C [8] and RAD51D [9] have also been associated with an increased risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. These observations highlight a critical role for the HR pathway in protecting against cellular transformation, particularly of hormone-responsive, epithelial cells that have a high proliferative capacity. Interestingly, however, it has been shown that biallelic, null germline mutations in BRCA2 [10–14] and PALB2 [15–17], hypomorphic mutations in BRCA1 [18,19] and Rad51C [20], or in the case of RAD51 [21] a dominant mutation, all give rise to a spectrum of clinical symptoms that have features of Fanconi Anaemia (FA). Unlike Fanconi anaemia patients with mutations of one of the core complex Fanconi proteins, those with inherited mutations in the HR machinery, including PALB2 mutant patients, typically display severe developmental abnormalities, such as microcephaly, growth retardation, intellectual impairment as well as skeletal abnormalities. These patients also commonly exhibit kidney malformations, microphthalmia, skin hypo/hyper-pigmentation, hypoplastic thumbs and gonadal dysgenesis, although unlike typical FA patients, bone marrow failure is almost never observed. Cells derived from these patients are almost invariably hyper-sensitive to DNA cross-linking agents, e.g. mitomycin C (MMC) and diepoxybutane, as well as ionising radiation (IR), consistent with a defect in homologous recombination. Given the clinical similarity between FA and the consequences of mutations in HR genes, patients with biallelic mutations in BRCA2, PALB2, BRCA1, RAD51C and the RAD51 dominant mutation have been designated FA-D1, FA-N, FA-S, FA-O and FA-R respectively. The severity of the defects exhibited by HR-defective patients serves to emphasise the importance of the recombination pathway in dealing with DSBs and damaged replication forks that occur naturally with fairly high frequency during development.
In contrast to the consequences of mono-allelic mutation of these genes in carriers, biallelic null mutations predispose patients to embryonal tumours, e.g. Wilms’ tumour, neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma and AML in infancy. The different spectrum of tumours that develops in the FA-like patients, compared with carriers heterozygous for a germline mutation, probably arises as a consequence of inactivating HR early in embryonal cells versus inactivation in an already differentiated cell type.
Given the rarity of patients with biallelic mutations in genes involved in the HR machinery, the range of the clinical symptoms displayed by the affected individuals is limited. Indeed, all hitherto described FA-N patients have two truncating PALB2 mutations and a very similar, severe clinical presentation. Here we describe a family with two PALB2 mutations where the affected individuals presented with few of the clinical features typically exhibited by FA-N patients. Unlike FA-N individuals who present in infancy, patients in this study presented at an older age and did not exhibit most of the developmental abnormalities associated with this FA complementation group. Interestingly, although the affected patients developed tumours at a relatively early age, these were B cell lymphomas rather than embryonal tumours. We demonstrate that the PALB2 protein produced from one of the mutant alleles carried by these patients retains both its N- and C-terminal domain required to interact with BRCA1 and BRCA2 respectively. We also show that this mutant PALB2 preserves some function compared with previously identified patient-associated mutant PALB2 proteins and allows low level recruitment of Rad51 foci at sites of DNA damage. We propose that the presence of this mutant protein accounts for the milder MMC hyper-sensitivity exhibited by cells from these patients and the lack of defining clinical characteristics. Lastly, the identification of this family implicates PALB2 as a potential suppressor of lymphoid tumourigenesis and raises the possibility that somatic mutations in this gene may contribute to the development of sporadic lymphomas.
Results
Patients
A 12 year old girl (II-4) was admitted to hospital in August 2008 with enlarged cervical lymph nodes and enlarged tonsils. The histopathology of the lymph node biopsy revealed B cell non Hodgkin lymphoma, stage II. The tumour exhibited a CD20+, CD79a+, CD 10+, immunophenotype, Bcl-2 focal positivity, Ki-67 >90% positivity, whereas other markers were negative including CD3, CD45RO, CD15, CD30, ALK and EMA.
The patient was subsequently treated according to B NHL BFM 2004 protocol (arm R2: element A twice—dexamethasone, VCR, ARA-C, etoposide, MTX, IFO; element B twice—dexamethasone, VCR, DOXO, MTX, cyclophosphamide) until November 2008 without any episode of WHO Grade III or IV toxicity. Since then, she has entered and remained in complete clinical remission. She is now aged 19 years.
Notably, the patient did not have typical features of Fanconi anemia such as radial aplasia, aplastic anaemia or malformation of the kidneys. Renal echosonography as well as cardiac US were normal. Rather, she showed a slight degree of learning difficulty with problematic speech and pronunciation. However, in similarity with Fanconi anaemia height and weight were both below the 3rd centile for age. She also had a Mongol spot at the sacral area, a pigmented nevus at the right gluteus and dysmorphic facies. Peripheral blood cytogenetic analysis showed a normal karyotype (46, XX), although numerous spontaneous chromatid and isochromatid breaks were observed. Serum AFP was slightly elevated (35.4 μg/L; normal range: 0–13.4 μg/L) and immunoglobulin assay showed elevated IgM at 5.03 g/L. No mutations in the TP53 gene were detected.
A younger sister (now aged 15 years) (II-5) was also successfully treated for non-Hodgkin lymphoma at age 3.5 years. She had normal CBC, elevated AFP (34.4 μg/L) and normal immunoglobulin levels including IgM. The peripheral blood karyotype obtained from this sibling was also normal. Physical examination showed height and weight both below the 3rd centile, epicanthus, café au lait spot on the left shoulder (4x2 cm) and another larger café au lait spot (>10 cm diameter) on the left hip. Notably, this child had learning difficulty and speech impairment.
In August 2008 the family history revealed 5 additional siblings: The oldest brother (II-1) was aged 21 years and healthy, whereas the second brother (II-2) died at age of 3.5 years due to a bone cancer of unknown origin. The oldest sister (aged 15 years) (II-3) and siblings II-6 (aged 6 years) and II-7 (aged 4 years) also showed learning difficulty and speech impairment (Fig 1).
Unusual sensitivity to ionizing radiation and DNA crosslinking agents
The increased spontaneous chromosome breakage observed in blood lymphocytes from the affected patients (II-4 and II-5) was suggestive of a possible underlying DNA repair deficiency. To investigate this, we assessed the repair capacity of cells derived from one of the affected patients following exposure to IR (using both G2 chromosomal breakage analysis and colony survival assays) and also the DNA cross-linking agent MMC, (using both chromosomal breakage analysis and colony survival assays). Lymphocytes from the affected patient exhibited a high level of chromosome breakage, notably triradials and quadriradials, in response to MMC, similar to the level in two of the control Fanconi patients of unknown complementation group. Strikingly, a very high level of damage in response to IR was seen, higher than the level observed in A-T lymphocytes, indicative of a severe DNA repair defect (Table 1).
Table 1. Chromosomal damage in lymphocytes from PALB2 patient II-5 and controls.
Total number of Cells | Number of Rings | Number of Dicentrics | Number of Fragments | Number of Chromatid gaps | Number of Chromatid Breaks | Number of Tri-radials | Number of Quadri-radials | Number of Multi-radials |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) Patient blood—untreated | ||||||||
50 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(2) Following exposure to 0.1μgml-1 mitomycin C for 4h and cultured to 48h Patient II-5 | ||||||||
50 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 20 | 8 | 8 | 3 |
Normal control | ||||||||
50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Three typical Fanconi anaemia patients | ||||||||
50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 0 |
50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 21 | 10 | 10 | 0 |
50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
(3) Following exposure to 1.0 Gray γ-rays@ G2 Patient II-5 | ||||||||
50 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 81 | 54 | 29 | 18 | 9 |
Normal control | ||||||||
50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Two classical ataxia telangiectasia patients (positive control) | ||||||||
50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 29 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Interestingly, in contrast to the results obtained from the chromosomal breakage analysis, fibroblasts from both affected sisters had a normal sensitivity to IR as judged by colony survival and an intermediate sensitivity to MMC, when compared to a fibroblast cell line derived from a typical FA patient of unknown complementation group (although FA-A is the most common)(Fig 1). The apparent disparity between the two different IR assays can be explained by the fact that the IR induced chromosomal breakage is a consequence of unrepaired DNA damage occurring in G2-phase, whereas colony survival assays with skin fibroblasts take into account repair across the entire cell cycle. Given that approximately 85% of all DSBs, irrespective of cell cycle phase, are repaired by NHEJ, a normal survival response to IR, increased G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity and decreased MMC survival indicated a defect in HR.
Since mutations in the Mre11-Rad50-Nbn (MRN) complex give rise to a chromosomal hypersensitivity to both IR and MMC and, at least in the case of NBS patients predisposition to developing lymphoid malignancies, such as B cell lymphomas, we monitored the activation of ATM in response to DSBs using Western blotting coupled with phospho-antibodies to known substrates of ATM. Notably, the IR-induced phosphorylation of ATM (Ser-1981) as well as that of Smc1 (Ser-966) and Nbn (Ser-343), all of which are known to be reduced in the absence of a functional MRN complex, were completely normal in an LCL derived from patient II-5 (Fig 2). Similar results were obtained using fibroblasts derived from both patients II-4 and II-5 (S1 Fig). Since ATM could be efficiently activated in cells from both affected patients and the levels of Nbn were unaltered, this indicated that it was unlikely that the underlying DNA repair defect could be accounted for by a deficiency in the MRN complex.
Abnormal IRIF focus formation
Given that our preliminary analysis of cells derived from the two affected sisters suggested an underlying HR defect, we next determined whether cells from these patients exhibited any problems recruiting specific DNA repair proteins to sites of DSBs or DNA cross-links. At early time points following exposure to a low dose of IR, fibroblasts from patients II-4 and II-5 were able to relocalise MDC1, 53BP1, BRCA1, FANCD2 and RPA2 to sites of DSBs marked by γH2AX foci, in a manner similar to a normal fibroblast cell line. Comparable results were obtained when the patient cells were exposed to low dose MMC (S2 Fig). However, in keeping with an underlying DNA repair deficiency, both patients’ fibroblasts displayed residual foci at late times post-irradiation (S2 Fig).
In stark contrast to our findings assessing the relocalisation of MDC1, 53BP1, BRCA1, FANCD2 and RPA2, fibroblasts from both affected patients completely failed to recruit Rad51 to sites of DNA damage induced by either IR or MMC (Fig 3). In light of the fact that Rad51 foci formation was not completely abolished in the absence of BRCA1 and that cells from our affected patients could still efficiently relocalise BRCA1, this suggested that the underlying genetic defect in our unusual DNA repair deficient family most likely arose as a consequence of mutations in PALB2, BRCA2 or RAD51.
Protein and Mutation analysis in cells from family members
Based on the inability of the affected patient cells to form Rad51 foci in response to DNA damage, we utilised Western blotting to assess the levels of BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and Rad51 in cells from affected patient II-5. Whilst BRCA1 and Rad51 were readily detectable in the affected patient tested compared to normal cells, full length PALB2 was completely absent and the stability of BRCA2 significantly reduced (S3 Fig) presumably due to the low level of stabilising mutant PALB2 protein. Interestingly, two faint lower molecular weight bands detected with the PALB2 antibody were present in cells from patient II-5 indicating the presence of expressed truncated mutant protein (Fig 4A and 4B).
Following sequencing of the PALB2 gene in both sisters, we identified two deleterious mutations: c.1676_1677delAAinsG; (p.Gln559ArgfsTer2) in exon 4 and c.2586+1G>A; (p.Thr839_Lys862del), a base substitution in the first base of intron 6 that affected the donor splice site resulting in an in frame skip of exon 6 (24 amino acids) (Fig 5A–5D). Further analysis of these mutations in other family members revealed that the mother and sibling II-3 inherited the c.1676_1677delAAinsG; (p.Gln559ArgfsTer2)(p.Q559RfsTer2) mutation, whereas the father and sibling II-6 inherited the c.2586+1G>A; (p.Thr839_Lys862del)(p.T839_K862del) mutation and sibling II-7 carried two normal alleles. Mutations were not detected in BRCA2 or RAD51 in II-4 and II-5.
Consistent with the identified mutations, the high and low molecular weight proteins detected in cells from patient II-5 with the PALB2 antibody corresponded to the approximate sizes of the p.Thr839_Lys862del and p.Gln559ArgfsTer2 mutant PALB2 proteins respectively (Fig 4). The smaller protein, at about 90kD, was the same size as another protein that cross-reacted with this antibody.
Interestingly, the N-terminal coiled coil domain (aa9-44) of PALB2 that has been shown to interact with BRCA1 [3,4] was retained in both mutant proteins. In contrast, the C-terminal WD-40 repeat domain of PALB2 that is essential for its interaction with BRCA2 was only preserved in the p.Thr839_Lys862del mutant protein. It was, therefore, speculated that the mild clinical presentation of the disease in affected siblings, together with the absence of embryonal tumours, could be attributed to residual function of the exon 6 deletion mutant PALB2 protein.
Functional analysis of mutant PALB2 proteins
Remarkably, the two PALB2 mutations (T839_K862del and Q559RfsTer2) identified in our atypical FA-N family were similar to two PALB2 mutations (Y551Ter) and an in frame revertant (Exon4delRev) with both the N- and C-terminal domains that was derived by Xia et al, [15] from the EUFA1341 cell line. In keeping with the position of known binding sites on the PALB2 protein, the Y551Ter mutant was unable to interact with BRCA2 and as such could not complement the MMC hypersensitivity or Rad51 foci defect of the EUFA1341 cell line. In contrast, the in frame Exon4delRev PALB2 retained its ability to bind to BRCA2 and could complement cellular defects exhibited by the EUFA1341 cell line [15].
In order to examine the capability of our two different patient mutant PALB2 proteins to interact with BRCA2, isogenic Flp-In/T-Rex U2OS cells were generated that inducibly expressed FLAG tagged WT PALB2, the individual PALB2 mutations identified in our FANCN family and the individual mutations described by Xia et al, [15]. An siRNA sequence directed against the 3’ UTR of the PALB2 mRNA (not present in the exogenous PALB2 open reading frame) was used to deplete endogenous PALB2 protein to prevent the presence of this WT protein interfering with our interaction studies.
Following siRNA-mediated depletion of endogenous PALB2 protein, the induced FLAG-tagged exogenous PALB2 was immunoprecipitated with an anti-FLAG antibody and the presence of BRCA2 verified by Western blotting. Consistent with previous observations by Xia et al, [15] WT PALB2 and the revertant lacking exon 4 (Exon4delRev), but not the Y551Ter mutant, were able to robustly co-immunoprecipitate BRCA2 (Fig 6A). In a similar fashion, despite being expressed at low levels, the p.T839_K862del mutant PALB2 protein, but not the C-terminally truncated mutant (Q559RfsTer2), could interact with BRCA2 (Fig 6A). Taken together, these data are consistent with the notion that the exon 6 deleted p.T839_K862del PALB2 mutant allele lacking the 9 most N-terminal amino acids of the WD40 repeat region still interacts with BRCA2 and, therefore, possesses some residual activity.
We, subsequently, investigated the activity of the p.T839_K862del mutant PALB2, by carrying out a complementation assay examining the localisation of Rad51 foci in the different U2OS cell lines that expressed either FLAG-tagged WT or mutant PALB2 proteins (S4 Fig). U2OS cells were plated on to coverslips and following siRNA-mediated depletion of endogenous PALB2 protein and induction of the FLAG-tagged exogenous PALB2 the location of Rad51 was determined. Expression of the Y551Ter (present in the EUFA1341 cell line) and the Q559RfsTer2 PALB2 protein from our patient did not permit recruitment of Rad51 foci to the sites of damage following MMC or IR treatment. This was in contrast to induction of the revertant PALB2 lacking exon 4 (Exon4delRev), as well as the exon 6 deleted p.T839_K862del mutant PALB2 in our patient, where recruitment of Rad51 foci following damage was seen in both instances (Fig 7). Therefore, the exon 6 deleted p.T839_K862del mutant PALB2 can, indeed, allow Rad51 recruitment to the sites of damage and the reason for the absence of Rad51 foci in patient cells is related to the low level of expression of this mutant PALB2.
Prediction of the effect of loss of PALB2 exon 6 on the structure of PALB2
PALB2 contains a seven-bladed beta-propeller (WD40-repeat) at its C-terminus [22]. Blade 7 of this repeat is formed by C-terminal beta-strands 7A, 7B and 7C, which are ‘zipped’ back to the first N-terminal strand (7D) in order to complete and seal the protein fold. A PALB2 Y1183Ter mutation, which resulted in loss of the 4 most C-terminal residues (strand 7C), is predicted to lead to incomplete folding and instability of the mutant protein [22]. Indeed, no truncated PALB2 protein was detected in patient cell lysates harbouring this mutation [16]. Interestingly, in the patients we describe here, amino acid residues 839–862 are deleted from the protein, which includes the entirety of beta-strand 7D (857–862: LVSELK) (Fig 8A).
Using sequence-threading and manual modelling strategies [23, PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.7.4 Schrödinger, LLC] we were able to generate a model for the mutant form of the protein, and compare this to the X-ray crystal structure of the wild-type WD40-repeat (PDB: 2W18). Loss of beta-strand 7D could be expected to lead to destabilisation of the protein fold, as several hydrogen bonds between the component beta-strands that form Blade 7 would not be made. However, this particular region of the protein is also hydrophobic in nature, and the side-chains of beta-strand 7D also contribute to stability of the fold via van der Waals interactions. In particular, the side chain of Leu861 (strand 7D) is buried in a small hydrophobic pocket, lined by residues Asn863, Ile887, Thr889, Trp898, Trp906 and Ile1180 (Fig 8B).
Secondary structure predictions [23] indicate helical propensity for the amino acid sequence immediately upstream of strand 7D. The in-frame deletion of exon 6, would lead to a direct fusion of this helical region to the start of the WD40-repeat (i.e. replacing beta-strand 7D). Side chains of Cys828, His832 and Val836 protrude from one face of the modelled helix, and can be positioned such that they resemble in part, structurally and spatially, those of beta-strand 7D (Val858, Ser859 and Leu861 (Fig 8C). Moreover, Val836 is positioned to interact with the hydrophobic pocket—normally occupied by Leu861—and hence stabilise the protein fold.
This suggests one potential way in which the fold of the mutant WD40-repeat may be retained. A second plausible alternative, is that another, more distant part of the PALB2 protein, can adopt a similar beta-strand conformation to that of 7D, and again stabilise the fold.
Although the in-frame deletion clearly affects the overall stability of the truncated protein in patient cells, is it nevertheless still detectable, albeit at a reduced level.
The mutant form of the protein can also be transiently expressed in U2OS cells, but again is unstable compared with full length PALB2.
Loss of beta-strand 7D, like the Y1183Ter mutation, might be expected to affect closure of the WD40-repeat and lead to protein mis-folding and targeted degradation. However, the mutant protein is clearly functional, as demonstrated by its ability to interact with BRCA2 (Fig 6A) and by facilitating Rad51 recruitment to foci.
Discussion
Here we describe an unusual family in which the affected individuals have biallelic mutations in PALB2, yet do not display the clinical features typically associated with the disease. We propose that the mild clinical phenotype exhibited by the affected patients in this family results from the presence of an expressed mutant PALB2 protein that retains a sufficient level of WT activity.
PALB2 functions as a molecular bridge linking BRCA1-containing DNA repair complexes with the core HR machinery consisting of BRCA2, Rad51 and the Rad51 paralogs. The C-terminal WD40 domain of PALB2 is the major binding site for BRCA2 and as a consequence is essential for the formation of Rad51 foci in response to DNA damage. The N-terminal coiled-coil domain of PALB2 is required for its ability to interact with BRCA1 [3,4]. However, the functional relevance of this interaction is unclear. It has been reported that BRCA1 targets the PALB2-BRCA2 complex to sites of DNA damage. Whether this occurs directly through its ability to bind PALB2, or indirectly via its role in promoting DNA end-resection, is not known. Unlike loss of BRCA2, compromising BRCA1 expression does not completely abrogate the ability of PALB2 to relocalise to sites of DNA damage or promote Rad51 nucleofilament formation, suggesting that this interaction may be required to increase the efficiency of HR. Despite this, there is conflicting evidence as to whether the BRCA1-PALB2 interaction is actually required for DNA repair or not. Simhadri et al, [24] reported that an engineered triple point mutation in the murine PALB2 gene that reduced its ability to bind BRCA1 gave rise to a mild DNA repair defect. In contrast Xia et al, [15] showed that a C-terminally truncated PALB2 that still retains its BRCA1 binding site could not complement the DNA repair defects exhibited by a FA-N patient-derived cell line. Based on these observations and the fact that we could co-precipitate the T839_K862del but not the Q559RfsTer2 patient-associated mutant PALB2 protein with BRCA2, we suggest that the T839_K862del mutant PALB2 allele retained sufficient function to alleviate the clinical symptoms associated with a PALB2 deficiency. Structural modelling of this hypomorphic patient mutation indicated that, whilst the loss of residues Thr839-Lys862 located proximal to a small hydrophobic pocket within blade 7 of the WD40 repeat domain is likely to destabilise the protein due to loss of several critical hydrogen bonds, repositioning of upstream hydrophobic residues Cys828, His832 and Val836 may in part compensate for the loss of the missing amino acids and provide some increased stability of the mutant protein (Fig 6). As a consequence, expression of this mutant protein, albeit at reduced levels, may be sufficient to alleviate the clinical symptoms and cellular defects exhibited by the affected patients.
Interestingly, cells derived from the affected patients from this family do not form Rad51 foci in response to either DNA DSBs or cross-links. In contrast, following either IR or MMC exposure Rad51 foci were observed in U2OS cells that expressed the exon 6 deleted T839_K862del mutant PALB2. Therefore, the T839_K862del mutant PALB2 does retain residual function, but it is not expressed at levels sufficient to result in detectable Rad51 foci in patient cells. Rather, it appears that Rad51 is recruited to sites of DNA damage in these patient cells at a level that is below detection by standard immunofluorescence.
The presence of the p.Thr839_Lys862del mutant PALB2 impacts on the ability of the cell to repair DNA damage by HR as shown by the large increase in G2 chromosome damage following IR exposure. The disparity between the IR-induced chromosomal breakage and the colony survival analysis of the affected patient cells is readily explained. The chromosomal analysis assay, described here, predominantly measures G2 phase DSB repair, which will detect defects in both NHEJ and HR. In contrast, the colony survival assay will primarily detect abnormalities in the NHEJ pathway since the DNA damage is induced in an asynchronous culture in which the vast majority of the fibroblasts will be in G1 phase of the cell cycle. Absence of increased radiosensitivity by colony forming assay has been observed in FA-D1 cells [25], although a chromosome assay of FA-D1 lymphocytes exposed at G2 showed them to be very radiosensitive. A similar insensitivity to IR by colony forming ability, but clear increased sensitivity to chromosome damage following G2 irradiation, has also been observed in both fibroblasts and lymphoblasts from patients with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome [26] with a defect in sister chromatid cohesion. Interestingly, our observations, which are consistent with deficient DNA DSB repair as a result of a defect in HR in these hypomorphic PALB2 patients, using the same endpoint (Table 1) show an effect greater than seen in classical ataxia telangiectasia patients. The G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity of our patients with hypomorphic PALB2 mutations is also greater than seen in Fanconi patients with likely mutations in the FA core complex proteins [27].
In contrast, following exposure to MMC the colony forming ability of fibroblasts from patients II-4 and II-5, while impaired compared with normal, appeared not to be as deficient as cells from core complex protein Fanconi patients, PALB2 patients [15,16] or FA-D1 patients [25,26]. Published data for chromosomal sensitivity to MMC does not appear to be available for FA-D1 or FA-N patient lymphocytes compared with core complex patients. We assume that the chromosomal sensitivity to MMC of our hypomorphic PALB2 patient was less than that of a null patient. While null PALB2 (and BRCA2) patients have a defect in both DNA double strand break repair and also the resolution of DNA crosslinks leading to their profound clinical presentation, the presence of the hypomorphic PALB2 mutation alleviates this considerably.
The clinical features of the two siblings (II-4 and II-5) shown to have the biallelic PALB2 mutations included abnormally small size, dysmorphic facies and lymphoid tumour development. It is less clear whether the learning difficulty and speech impairment are part of the PALB2 syndrome in this family, because of their occurrence in other family members without biallelic mutation of PALB2. Most strikingly, these sisters did not present in infancy with the much more severe developmental features and embryonal type tumours associated with biallelic truncating mutations of PALB2 or, indeed, biallelic truncating mutation of BRCA2. However, the sisters shared the Fanconi anaemia patient characteristic of small size. The absence of radial aplasia or abnormalities of the thumbs would not preclude a diagnosis of FA, as not all FA patients show these features. Unlike typical Fanconi anaemia patients, however, 80% of whom have a mutation in a core Fanconi anaemia core protein/gene, they did not have aplastic anaemia, a common presentation of FA between ages 5–10 years. Therefore, although some milder clinical features of FA were present, the phenotype of the affected sisters was clearly distinct from either typical PALB2 (FA-N) patients or typical FA.
A particularly important aspect of the clinical phenotype of the patients with a PALB2 defect described in this study is that both affected individuals developed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). This tumour type clearly differs from the embryonal-type tumours that normally develop in FA-N or FA-D1 patients. The occurrence of B-NHL in this family could be specific to the particular inherited PALB2 mutation or could arise as a consequence of the slightly older age of the affected patients in this family as compared to most classical FA-N patients. Nevertheless, the presence of a lymphoid tumour in both affected individuals does raise the interesting possibility that PALB2 may represent a novel tumour suppressor of lymphoid malignancies in a manner similar to ATM and NBN.
Methods
Cell culture
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) were established from the younger sister (II-5), both parents (I-1 and I-2) and siblings II-3, II-6 and II-7) (Fig 1) as well as control lymphocytes. LCLs were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Irvine, UK) supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS). Fibroblast cultures were also established from skin biopsies from both affected patients II-4 & II-5 and cells grown in DMEM with 10%FCS.
Assays for γ-irradiation and mitomycin C sensitivity
For colony forming assays, serial dilutions of primary skin fibroblasts from a normal individual, the two affected individuals (II-4 & II-5) in the family under investigation and TERT immortalised fibroblasts from an ataxia telangiectasia patient were irradiated with 1 to 5Gy of γ rays. Patient, normal control and Fanconi Anaemia fibroblasts were exposed for 1h to mitomycin C at concentrations of 0.05–0.40μgml-1. Treated fibroblasts were seeded on to a lethally irradiated (35Gy) feeder layer of normal fibroblasts (6x104 cells per 9.0cm dish) in DMEM (Sigma Aldrich) with 10% FCS. Cells were plated in quadruplicate and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37°C for 18–21 days with medium changing. The medium was removed, colonies fixed with formaldehyde and stained with 0.5% Methylene Blue (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK). The number of colonies on each plate was counted and percentage survival calculated.
To assess chromosomal radiosensitivity, whole blood cultures in RPMI 1640 + FCS were stimulated with PHA for 72h and exposed to 1Gy 137Cs γ-rays 4h before harvesting. Colcemid was added 1h prior to harvesting. Chromosome spreads were made using standard methods and chromosome damage analysed by light microscopy. For chromosomal sensitivity to MMC, whole blood cultures were exposed to either 0.01 or 0.05μgml-1 for 30 minutes, washed out and cells harvested 48h later, again with colcemid added 1h prior to harvesting.
Immunofluorescence
Cells seeded on to coverslips were permeabilized in CSK100 buffer (10 mM PIPES, 20 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 300 mM sucrose, 0.5% Triton X-100) for 5 min at 4°C and then fixed in 3.6% PFA/PBS for 10 min at 4°C. Coverslips were blocked for 1h in 10% FCS in PBS, incubated for 1h at room temperature with the primary antibody diluted in 2% FCS, washed three times in PBS, and then incubated for an additional 1h with the secondary antibody. Coverslips were washed again three times in PBS and then mounted onto a microscope slide with Vectashield containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Primary antibodies used were anti-γH2AX (05–636; Merck Millipore), anti-Rad51 (PC130; Calbiochem), anti-BRCA1 (sc-6954; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-MDC1 (made by G. Stewart), anti-53BP1 (NB100-904; Novus Biologicals), and anti-FANCD2 (sc-20022; Santa Cruz) and anti-RPA2 (NA18; Calbiochem). All secondary antibodies were either Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 594 coupled and purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Fluorescence images were taken using a Nikon E600 Eclipse microscope 333 equipped with a 60X oil lens, and images were acquired and analysed using Volocity Software 334 v4.1 (Improvision).
DNA sequence analysis
DNA sequencing was performed on PCR products using the Applied Biosystems BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Part No. 4336917). Sequence analysis of purified products of sequencing reactions was performed using an Applied Biosystems 3500xL Genetic Analyzer. PALB2 sequence variations were designated according to the reference genomic (NG_007406.1), mRNA (NM_024675.3) and protein (NP_078951.2) sequences.
Immunoblotting for PALB2 expression and ATM kinase activity assays
To analyse the level of PALB2 expression in LCLs, cell pellets were resuspended in UTB buffer (8M urea, 50mM Tris pH 7.5, 150mM β-mercaptoethanol) and lysed on ice by sonication. 50μg of lysate was separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and the proteins transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Pierce). Nitrocellulose strips were subjected to immunoblotting and protein bands visualised using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system and exposure to Hyper-film (GE Healthcare). PALB2 antibodies used for immunoblotting were rabbit polyclonals A301-246A (Bethyl Laboratories) that recognises an epitope between residues 200–250 of PALB2 and A301-247A that recognises an epitope between residues 675–725 (see Fig 5). Other antibodies used were anti-BRCA2 (OP95; Calbiochem), anti-BRCA1 (OP92; Calbiochem), anti-Rad51 (SC-8349; Santa Cruz), anti-Aprataxin (made in house) and anti-FLAG (F1804; Sigma-Aldrich).
To analyse ATM signalling cells were either mock-irradiated or exposed to 5Gy ionising radiation and harvested after 30 minutes. Antibodies used for immunoblotting were: ATM 11G12 (made in house), anti-phospho ATM (S1981) (AF1655; R&D Systems), anti-SMC1 (A300-055A; Bethyl Laboratories), anti-phospho SMC1 (S966) (A300-050A; Bethyl), anti-KAP-1 (A300-274A; Bethyl), anti-phospho KAP-1 (S824) (A300-767A; Bethyl), anti-NBN (ab23996; Abcam), anti-phospho NBN (S343) (ab47272; Abcam), anti-phospho CHK2 (T68) (2661; Cell Signaling Technology, New England Biolabs), anti-CREB (48H2; Cell Signaling), anti-phospho CREB (S121) (NB100-410; Novus Biologicals), anti-γH2AX (05–636; Merck Millipore), anti-H2A (07–146; Merck Millipore), anti-phospho BRCA1 (S1423) (Bethyl), anti-BRCA1 (OP92; Calbiochem), anti-Chk2 (gift from Dr S. Elledge), anti-53BP1 (NB100-904; Novus Biologicals) and anti-phospho 53BP1 (S1778) (2675; Cell Signaling Technology).
Creation of stable Flp-In/T-Rex U2OS cell lines
Isogenic U2OS cell lines inducibly expressing either WT or mutant FLAG-tagged PALB2 were created using the Flp-In/T-Rex system. WT PALB2, or a series of PALB2 mutants were cloned into the pcDNA5/FRT/TO plasmid containing an N-terminal FLAG tag and then transfected into U2OS cells containing a single FRT recombination site. Transfected cells were selected with hygromycin and blasticidin and then cloned. Expression of the inducible FLAG-tagged PALB2 protein in each of the cell clones was determined by Western blotting. The PALB2 mutants generated in this study were a revertant PALB2 exon 4 deletion (Exon4delRev) and a FA-N patient-derived mutation Y551Ter, both previously described by Xia et al (15) and both exon 6 deletion (p.T839_K862del) (c. 2586+1G>A; p.Thr839_Lys862del) and Q559RfsTer2 (c.1676_1677delAAinsG; p.Gln559ArgfsTer2) identified in our patients.
Knockdown of endogenous PALB2 using siRNA
A PALB2 siRNA (GGAGAAUAUCUGAAUGACAdTdT) directed against the 3’ UTR region of PALB2 mRNA [4] was used to knockdown endogenous PALB2. Cells were transfected with siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers protocol. Four hours post-transfection 1μg/ml doxycycline was added to the cells to induce exogenous PALB2 protein expression. The PALB2 cDNA sequences cloned in the pcDNA5-FLAG/FRT/TO vector did not contain 3’-UTR sequences and transcripts from these constructs were not targeted by the siRNA. Cells were harvested 48h post-transfection. The efficiency of PALB2 knockdown was determined by Western blotting.
Immunoprecipitation
Immunoprecipitations were performed using a protocol published previously [28].
Supporting Information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
We thank Cancer Research UK for their continued support (www.cancerresearchuk.org Grant Number C1016/A14346 Grant holder: AMRT). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Xia B, Sheng Q, Nakanishi K, Ohashi A, Wu J, Christ N et al. (2006) Control of BRCA2 cellular and clinical functions by a nuclear partner, PALB2. Mol Cell 22:719–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sy SM, Huen MS, Chen J. (2009) PALB2 is an integral component of the BRCA complex required for homologous recombination repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:7155–7160. 10.1073/pnas.0811159106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang F, Ma J, Wu J, Ye L, Cai H, Xia B et al. (2009) PALB2 links BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the DNA-damage response. Curr Biol 19:524–529. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhang F, Fan Q, Ren K, Andreassen PR. (2009) PALB2 functionally connects the breast cancer susceptibility proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2. Mol Cancer Res 7:1110–1118. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bleuyard JY, Buisson R, Masson JY, Esashi F. (2012) ChAM, a novel motif that mediates PALB2 intrinsic chromatin binding and facilitates DNA repair. EMBO Rep 13:135–141. 10.1038/embor.2011.243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Park J-Y, Zhang F, Andreassen PR. (2014) PALB2: The hub of a network of tumor suppressors involved in DNA damage responses. Biochim Biophys Acta 1846: 263–275 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Antoniou AC, Casadei S, Heikkinen T, Barrowdale D, Pylkäs K, Roberts J et al. (2014) Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. N Engl J Med 371:497–506. 10.1056/NEJMoa1400382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Meindl A, Hellebrand H, Wiek C, Erven V, Wappenschmidt B, Niederacher D. et al. (2010) Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet 42:410–414. 10.1038/ng.569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Loveday C, Turnbull C, Ramsay E, Hughes D, Ruark E, Frankum JR. et al. (2011) Germline mutations in RAD51D confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Nat Genet 43:879–882. 10.1038/ng.893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Howlett NG, Taniguchi T, Olson S, Cox B, Waisfisz Q, De Die-Smulders C. et al. (2002) Biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 in Fanconi anemia. Science 297:606–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Offit K, Levran O, Mullaney B, Mah K, Nafa K, Batish SD. et al. (2003) Shared genetic susceptibility to breast cancer, brain tumors, and Fanconi anemia. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1548–1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wagner JE, Tolar J, Levran O, Scholl T, Deffenbaugh A, Satagopan J. et al. (2004) Germline mutations in BRCA2: shared genetic susceptibility to breast cancer, early onset leukemia, and Fanconi anemia. Blood 103:3226–3229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alter BP, Rosenberg PS, Brody LC. (2007) Clinical and molecular features associated with biallelic mutations in FANCD1/BRCA2. J Med Genet 44:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Myers K, Davies SM, Harris RE, Spunt SL, Smolarek T, Zimmerman S, et al. (2007) The clinical phenotype of children with Fanconi anemia caused by biallelic FANCD1/BRCA2 mutations. Pediatr Blood Cancer 58:462–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xia B, Dorsman JC, Ameziane N, de Vries Y, Rooimans MA, Sheng Q. et al. (2007) Fanconi anemia is associated with a defect in the BRCA2 partner PALB2. Nat Genet 39:159–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Reid S, Schindler D, Hanenberg H, Barker K, Hanks S, Kalb R. et al. (2007) Biallelic mutations in PALB2 cause Fanconi anemia subtype FA-N and predispose to childhood cancer. Nat Genet 39:162–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Serra A, Eirich K, Winkler AK, Mrasek K, Göhring G, Barbi G. et al. (2012) Shared Copy Number Variation in Simultaneous Nephroblastoma and Neuroblastoma due to Fanconi Anemia. Mol Syndromol 3:120–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Domchek SM, Tang J, Stopfer J, Lilli DR, Hamel N, Tischkowitz M. et al. (2013) Biallelic deleterious BRCA1 mutations in a woman with early-onset ovarian cancer. Cancer Discov 3:399–405. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sawyer SL, Tian L, Kähkönen M, Schwartzentruber J, Kircher M, Majewski J. et al. (2015) Biallelic mutations in BRCA1 cause a new Fanconi anemia subtype. Cancer Discov 5:135–142. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-1156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vaz F, Hanenberg H, Schuster B, Barker K, Wiek C, Erven V. et al. (2010) Mutation of the RAD51C gene in a Fanconi anemia-like disorder. Nat Genet 42:406–409. 10.1038/ng.570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang AT, Kim T, Wagner JE, Conti BA, Lach FP, Huang AL. et al. (2015) A Dominant Mutation in Human RAD51 Reveals Its Function in DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair Independent of Homologous Recombination. Mol Cell 59:478–490. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oliver AW, Swift S, Lord CJ, Ashworth A & Pearl LH. (2009) Structural basis for recruitment of BRCA2 by PALB2. EMBO Rep 10:991–996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kelley LA, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ. (2015) The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc 10:845–858. 10.1038/nprot.2015.053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Simhadri S, Peterson S, Patel D, Huo Y, Cai H, Bowman-Colin C. et al. (2014) Male fertility defect associated with disrupted BRCA1-PALB2 interaction in mice. J Biol Chem 289:24617–24629. 10.1074/jbc.M114.566141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Godthelp BC, van Buul PP, Jaspers NG, Elghalbzouri-Maghrani E, van Duijn-Goedhart A, Arwert F. et al. (2006) Cellular characterization of cells from the Fanconi anemia complementation group, FA-D1/BRCA2 Mutat Res 601:191–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vrouwe MG, Elghalbzouri-Maghrani E, Meijers M, Schouten P, Godthelp BC, Bhuiyan ZA. et al. (2007) Increased DNA damage sensitivity of Cornelia de Lange syndrome cells;evidence for impaired recombinational repair. Hum Mol Genet 16:1478–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Duckworth-Rysiecki G, Taylor AM. (1985) Effects of ionizing radiation on cells from Fanconi's anemia patients. Cancer Res 45:416–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Townsend K, Mason H, Blackford AN, Miller ES, Chapman JR, Sedgwick GG et al. (2009) Mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1) regulates mitotic progression. J Biol Chem 284:33939–33948. 10.1074/jbc.M109.009191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.