Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2016 Feb 24;5:e12444. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12444

The autophagy gene Atg16l1 differentially regulates Treg and TH2 cells to control intestinal inflammation

Agnieszka M Kabat 1, Oliver J Harrison 1,2,, Thomas Riffelmacher 3,4,, Amin E Moghaddam 1, Claire F Pearson 5, Adam Laing 6, Lucie Abeler-Dörner 6, Simon P Forman 7, Richard K Grencis 7, Quentin Sattentau 1, Anna Katharina Simon 3,4, Johanna Pott 1,*,, Kevin J Maloy 1,*,
Editor: Ivan Dikic8
PMCID: PMC4798959  PMID: 26910010

Abstract

A polymorphism in the autophagy gene Atg16l1 is associated with susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, it remains unclear how autophagy contributes to intestinal immune homeostasis. Here, we demonstrate that autophagy is essential for maintenance of balanced CD4+ T cell responses in the intestine. Selective deletion of Atg16l1 in T cells in mice resulted in spontaneous intestinal inflammation that was characterized by aberrant type 2 responses to dietary and microbiota antigens, and by a loss of Foxp3+ Treg cells. Specific ablation of Atg16l1 in Foxp3+ Treg cells in mice demonstrated that autophagy directly promotes their survival and metabolic adaptation in the intestine. Moreover, we also identify an unexpected role for autophagy in directly limiting mucosal TH2 cell expansion. These findings provide new insights into the reciprocal control of distinct intestinal TH cell responses by autophagy, with important implications for understanding and treatment of chronic inflammatory disorders.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.001

Research Organism: Mouse

eLife digest

The gut presents a puzzle to our immune system. Immune cells must rapidly respond to antigens produced by harmful bacteria, but food and the beneficial bacteria that inhabit the gut also produce antigens that our immune system must tolerate. Inappropriate immune responses in the gut can lead to inflammatory bowel disease, a debilitating disease with no current cure. We do not fully understand why these harmful inflammatory responses arise, but we know that genetic factors are important. Mutations in genes that affect a process known as autophagy – a pathway that breaks down and recycles unwanted material inside cells – make inflammatory bowel disease more likely to develop, but exactly how they do so remains unclear.

T helper cells are crucial controllers of intestinal immune responses and changes in their numbers and behaviour occur during inflammatory bowel disease. Kabat et al. explored how the autophagy pathway affects these key immune cells in mice. Blocking autophagy in T cells altered the balance of different types of T helper cells in the gut. A crucial population of regulatory T cells, which keep inflammatory responses in check, was lost. At the same time, another population of T cells expanded: the T helper 2 (TH2) cells that are responsible for driving allergies. As a result, the mice developed intestinal inflammation and produced antibodies against gut bacteria and food.

Overall, Kabat et al.’s results show that autophagy defects can alter the balance of different types of T cells in the gut, leading to inflammation in the intestine. These observations contribute to our understanding of how genetic changes may influence susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease. They also suggest that drugs that activate autophagy could help to treat diseases associated with changes in regulatory T cells or TH2 cells, including inflammatory bowel disease and allergies. It will now be important to test this and to confirm whether similar changes in T cells are present in humans that have mutations in autophagy genes.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.002

Introduction

Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are the two most common forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. IBD is a complex multifactorial disease that emerges on a background of many genetic and environmental factors (Maloy and Powrie, 2011). In recent years, tremendous efforts have been undertaken to identify the genetic factors that influence susceptibility to IBD. In particular, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and subsequent meta-analyses have identified over 150 distinct loci that influence IBD susceptibility, many of which have revealed novel pathways in disease pathogenesis (Van Limbergen et al., 2014). Among these, a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the essential macroautophagy (hereafter called 'autophagy') gene ATG16L1 was associated with an increased risk of CD (Hampe et al., 2007; Rioux et al., 2007). A recent study showed that the IBD predisposing T300A mutation in the coding region of ATG16L1 led to increased degradation of ATG16L1 protein and reduced autophagy (Murthy et al., 2014), indicating that decreased autophagy may contribute to IBD development. Polymorphisms in several other autophagy-related genes, including IRGM, LRRK2 and SMURF1, are also linked to IBD susceptibility (Van Limbergen et al., 2014), suggesting that changes in the autophagy pathway alter intestinal homeostasis and predispose to chronic intestinal inflammation.

Autophagy is a highly conserved cellular process that targets cytoplasmic components for lysosomal degradation and maintains homeostasis by recycling damaged organelles and large cytoplasmic protein aggregates. Autophagy becomes particularly important during metabolic or infectious stress (Mizushima, 2007). Atg16l1 forms an essential autophagy complex with Atg5 and Atg12 that facilitates elongation of the initial isolation membrane that results in engulfment of the cargo and formation of the autophagosome. Subsequent fusion with the lysosome facilitates degradation and allows nutrient recycling (Mizushima et al., 2003). To identify the mechanisms through which autophagy may regulate intestinal tissue homeostasis, it is essential to understand the functional consequences of alterations in autophagy on both immune and tissue cells present in the gut. To date, several studies have examined the role of autophagy and Atg16l1 in intestinal epithelial cells and myeloid cells for intestinal homeostasis. In these studies, Atg16l1 was shown to play a role in Paneth cell physiology, as well as in bacterial handling and regulation of inflammatory IL-1β secretion by myeloid cells (Cadwell et al., 2008; Kuballa et al., 2008; Saitoh et al., 2008; Plantinga et al., 2011). However, the role of Atg16l1 in intestinal adaptive immune responses has not yet been addressed.

CD4+ T cells constitute the largest population of intestinal lymphocytes and are central mediators of host protective and tolerogenic responses in the gut (Shale et al., 2013). In particular, thymus-derived and peripherally induced Foxp3+ CD4+ regulatory T cells (tTreg and pTreg cells, respectively) are indispensable in promoting tolerance toward commensal and dietary antigens and for the prevention of aberrant effector T cell responses, including TH1, TH2 and TH17 cell responses (Izcue et al., 2009). An imbalance between effector and regulatory CD4+ T cells can promote chronic intestinal inflammation and accumulation of effector CD4+ T cells in the inflamed mucosa is a cardinal feature of IBD (Abraham and Cho, 2009; Maloy and Powrie, 2011; Shale et al., 2013). Therefore, it is important to define factors that regulate aberrant CD4+ T cell responses in the gastrointestinal tract.

Previous studies utilizing mice with T-cell-specific deletion of essential autophagy genes (Atg3, Atg5, Atg7, Beclin1) pointed to a key role of autophagy in T cell homeostasis, as these mice exhibited decreased frequencies and numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and defects in T cell proliferation in vitro (Pua et al., 2009; Stephenson et al., 2009; Jia and He, 2011; Kovacs et al., 2012). In addition, recent studies highlighted the importance of autophagy in the development of memory CD8+ T cells (Puleston et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014; Schlie et al., 2015). However, the exact requirements for autophagy during different stages of T cell activation and differentiation remain poorly understood (Xu et al., 2014). Given that the gastrointestinal tract is a site of continuous immune activation by external antigens and is therefore a challenging environment for the adaptive immune system, we hypothesized that a selective defect in autophagy may affect intestinal T cell homeostasis.

We investigated the role of Atg16l1 in intestinal CD4+ T cells by generating mice that selectively lack Atg16l1 in T cells. Here, we show that T-cell-specific deletion of Atg16l1 results in chronic intestinal inflammation accompanied by increased humoral responses toward commensal and dietary antigens. We further demonstrate that Atg16l1-deficiency has opposing effects on intestinal CD4+ T cells subsets; markedly enhancing TH2 responses whilst decreasing Treg cell numbers. Through selective ablation of Atg16l1 in Treg cells, we established the importance of cell-intrinsic autophagy for intestinal Treg cell homeostasis. Furthermore, through complementary in vivo approaches we show that autophagy controls TH2 responses through two distinct mechanisms; through a cell-intrinsic pathway and by promoting extrinsic regulation by Treg cells.

Results

Selective deletion of Atg16l1 in T cells results in spontaneous intestinal pathology

To investigate the role of autophagy in intestinal T cell homoeostasis, mice carrying loxP-flanked alleles of the essential autophagy gene Atg16l1 (Atg16l1fl/fl) (Hwang et al., 2012) were crossed with CD4-Cre mice, generating Atg16l1fl/fl::CD4-Cre mice (hereafter denoted as Atg16l1ΔCD4) in which Atg16l1 is selectively ablated in T cells from the double-positive stage of thymic development. To verify functional deletion of Atg16l1 autophagy levels were analyzed by autophagosome formation and LC3 lipidation. CD4+ T cells isolated from control Atg16l1fl/fl mice exhibited increased LC3+ autophagosome formation after activation, as measured by intracellular LC3 accumulation in the presence of a lysosomal inhibitor (Figure 1A). In contrast, there was no increase in intracellular LC3 accumulation in CD4+ T cells from Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (Figure 1A). To verify this finding using another method, we assessed LC3 lipidation by Western blot analysis (Klionsky et al., 2012). Activated control Atg16l1fl/fl CD4+ T cells exhibited increased lipidated LC3 II levels in the presence of chloroquine, indicative of autophagy-mediated turnover of LC3 II after T cell activation (Figure 1B). However, LC3 II levels in CD4+ T cells from Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice were barely affected by activation (Figure 1B), confirming a block in autophagy.

Figure 1. Aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice develop intestinal inflammation.

Figure 1.

(A) FACS analysis of LC3+ autophagosome formation in CD4+ T cells from cLP of Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl mice after overnight activation with or without α-CD3 (5 μg/ml) and α-CD28 (1 μg/ml). (B) Western blot analysis of LC3 lipidation in naïve splenic CD4+ T cells isolated from Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice and Atg16l1fl/fl mice after 3hr activation with α-CD3 (5 μg/ml) and α-CD28 (1 μg/ml) with or without chloroquine (CQ, inhibitor of lysosomal degradation, 50 μM). (C) Weight curves of Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (D) Representative images of spleens and mesenteric lymph nodes (mLN) from aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates and (E) spleen weights of young and aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (F,H) Representative photomicrographs of haemotoxilin and eosin (H&E) stained sections of (F) jejunum and (H) mid-colon from young and aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates, scale bar 150 μm. (G,I) Quantification of (G) SI lengths and (I) mid-colon crypt lengths in aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments (A-E, F, H) or combined from two (G) or three (I) independent experiments, with at least 3 mice per group. Data shown as mean ± s.e.m (A,C). Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means (E,G). In (I) each dot represents an individual crypt measurement and horizontal bars denote means. Statistical significance was determined using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons (C) or the Mann–Whitney test (E,G,I), **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. SI LP– small intestine lamina propria, cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old, aged mice >5 months old.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.003

Young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice appeared normal, initially gained weight in a manner comparable to Atg16l1fl/fl littermates and exhibited normal intestinal morphology (Figure 1C,F-H). However, from around 5 months of age, Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice stopped gaining weight (Figure 1C), developed splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy (Figure 1D,E) and chronic intestinal pathology that progressed with age (Figure 1F–I). Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice exhibited significant inflammation of both the small intestine (SI) and colon, characterized by increased SI length, marked lengthening of crypts, shortening of villi and epithelial hyperplasia (Figure 1F–I). Thus, T-cell-specific Atg16l1 deletion resulted in spontaneous intestinal inflammation and systemic immune activation.

Atg16l1 deficiency has opposing effects on intestinal Treg and TH2 cells

To characterize the effects of Atg16l1 on intestinal and systemic T cell homeostasis independently from any confounding effects of ongoing tissue inflammation, we analyzed young (8–12 weeks old) Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice before the onset of inflammatory pathology or systemic symptoms. Whilst thymic T cell production was unperturbed in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,B), frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in peripheral lymphoid organs were significantly decreased compared to Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (Figure 2A and Figure 2—figure supplement 1C). Furthermore, we observed significant decreases in intestinal T cell frequencies and numbers in the cLP and SI LP of Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (Figure 2A and Figure 2—figure supplement 1D). As CD4+ T cells are the main drivers and regulators of chronic intestinal inflammation (Shale et al., 2013), we focused subsequent analyses on CD4+ T cells.

Figure 2. Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice exhibit reciprocal dysregulation of intestinal TH2 and Treg cells before the onset of intestinal inflammation.

(A) Frequencies of CD4+ T cells as a proportion of live cells in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (B) Frequencies and (C) total numbers of IFN-γ+ TH1, IL-17A+ TH17 and IL-13+ TH2 cells isolated from cLP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ T cells). (D) Representative FACS plots of Gata3 and IL-13 (top) or IFN-γ and IL-17A (bottom) expression by cLP CD4+ T cells isolated from young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- live cells). (E) Frequencies of Gata3+ CD4+ T cells in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- cells). (F) Representative FACS plots and (G) frequencies of Foxp3+ Treg cells in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ cells). Data are combined from three or more independent experiments with at least two mice per group (A,B, D, E, G) or are representative of four independent experiments with at least four mice per group (D, F). Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means. Numbers indicate percentage of cells in gates or quadrants. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test, *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. SI LP– small intestine lamina propria, cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.004

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Characterization of immune cell compartments in young Atg16l1ΔCD4mice.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Frequencies and (B) representative FACS plots of single positive CD4+, single positive CD8+, double positive (DP) CD4+ CD8+ and double negative (DN) CD4- CD8- thymocytes in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (C) Frequencies of CD8+ T cells in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (D) Total numbers of CD4+ T cells in spleen, mLN, and cLP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. Data are combined from (A,C,D) or representative of (B) two or three independent experiments with at least 4 mice per group. Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means. Numbers indicate percentage of cells in quadrants. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test, *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. cLP – colonic lamina propria, mLN - mesenteric lymph nodes. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice have increased susceptibility to T-cell-mediated experimental IBD.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

Cohorts of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were infected with Helicobacter hepaticus by oral gavage (three feeds of 1x108 CFU) and treated with anti-IL-10R mAb (1mg/mouse i.p. given weekly; H.h + αIL10R) or left untreated (Ctr). Two weeks post-infection mice were sacrificed for analyses. (A) Caecum and colon histopathology scores in H.h + αIL10R-treated Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (B) Representative photomicrographs of H&E stained caecum of untreated Ctr (left panels) or H.h + αIL10R-treated (middle and right panels) Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates, scale bar 150 μm. (C) Total lamina propria leukocyte numbers and (D,E) frequencies of (D) neutrophils (Gr1hi CD11b+) and (E) CD4+ T cells in cLP isolated from untreated Ctr or H.h + αIL10R-treated Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. Data are combined from two or three independent experiments with at least two mice per group. Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test, *p<0.05; **p<0.01.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Elevated type 2 innate responses in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

(A) Frequencies of eosinophils (Ly6Clow Ly6Glow CD11b+ F4/80-) in spleen and mLN of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (B) Serum MCPT-1 levels in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were measured by ELISA. Data are combined from (A) or representative of (B) two or three independent experiments with at least four mice per group. Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test, *p<0.05; **p<0.01. mLN - mesenteric lymph nodes. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old.
Figure 2—figure supplement 4. Characterization of Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells.

Figure 2—figure supplement 4.

(A) Foxp3+ Treg cell numbers in spleen, mLN, cLP and SI LP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (B) Frequencies of Foxp3+ Treg in the thymus of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on single positive CD4+ TCRβ+ cells). (C) Frequencies of Neuropilin-1+ (Nrp1+) Foxp3+ Treg cells in the cLP and SI LP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3+ T cells). (D) Frequencies of Helios+ Foxp3+ Treg cells in the cLP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3+ T cells). (E) Frequencies of IL-17A+ or IFN-γ+ of Foxp3+ Treg cells in the cLP and SI LP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on Foxp3+ CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (F) Expression of CD103, CTLA4, CD25, CD69 and KLRG1 by cLP Foxp3+ Treg cells from young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on Foxp3+ CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (G) Representative FACS plots and (H) frequencies of Ki67+ Foxp3+ Treg cells in cLP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on Foxp3+ CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (I) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of phospo-S6 (P-S6) in Foxp3+ Treg cells in cLP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. Data are combined from two independent experiments with at least four mice per group (A,B,E), are representative from two independent experiments with at least four mice per group (C,F-H), or are from one experiment (D,I). Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means. Numbers indicate percentage of cells in gates. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test, *p<0.05; **p<0.01. mLN - mesenteric lymph nodes, SI LP– small intestine lamina propria, cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old.

Despite reduced numbers of T cells, Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice developed exacerbated disease in a CD4+ T cell-mediated model of IBD, indicating that Atg16l1-deficient CD4+ T cells are capable of driving intestinal inflammation (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Analysis of the effector CD4+ T cell compartment in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice revealed that frequencies of colonic TH1 (IFN-γ+) and TH17 (IL-17A+) populations were comparable in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (Figure 2B,D), although, due to decreased colonic CD4+ T cell numbers, total TH1 and TH17 numbers were significantly decreased (Figure 2C). Conversely, both frequencies and total numbers of TH2 (IL-13+) cells were significantly increased in cLP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (Figure 2B–D). These IL-13-producing cells were bona fide TH2 cells, as they co-expressed the lineage-specifying transcription factor Gata3 (Figure 2D,E). Interestingly, TH2 cell accumulation was primarily observed in the intestinal mucosa of Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, as TH2 cell frequencies were only marginally increased in the mLN and remained unchanged in the spleen (Figure 2E). However, the functional consequences of TH2 expansion extended beyond the intestine, as Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice had increased frequencies of eosinophils in both the spleen and mLN and elevated serum levels of mast cell protease 1 (MCPT-1), a marker of intestinal mast cell activation (Figure 2—figure supplement 3A,B).

As Foxp3+ Treg cells play a non-redundant role in control of effector T cells and the development of intestinal inflammation (Izcue et al., 2009), we hypothesized that alterations in Tregs might underlie the spontaneous intestinal pathology that developed in aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice. Indeed, we found that the frequencies of intestinal Foxp3+ Treg cells in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice were severely reduced, both in the SI and cLP (Figure 2F,G). Taking into account the decreased frequencies of CD4+ T cells in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (Figure 2A), this equated to a reduction in Treg cell numbers by around 10-fold in the colonic LP and 4-fold in SI LP (Figure 2—figure supplement 4A). In contrast, thymic development of Foxp3+ Treg cells was not diminished in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (Figure 2—figure supplement 4B), and we observed only minor, though significant, reductions in the frequencies and absolute numbers of Foxp3+ Treg cells in the spleen and mLN of Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice compared with Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (Figure 2G and Figure 2—figure supplement 4A). Thus, Atg16l1-deficiency profoundly affected the maintenance of Foxp3+ Treg cells in the periphery, particularly within the intestinal mucosa. Expression of neuropilin-1 (Nrp1) and Helios, putative markers proposed to distinguish pTreg and tTreg cells, were found at comparable levels on intestinal Foxp3+ Treg cells from Atg16l1fl/fl and Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, suggesting that the local environment, rather than site of Treg induction, primarily dictates the requirement for autophagy in Treg cells (Figure 2—figure supplement 4C,D). Assessment of how Atg16l1-deficiency affected intestinal Foxp3+ Treg cell phenotype showed that impaired autophagy significantly increased expression of effector TH cytokines in Treg cells from cLP and SI LP (Figure 2—figure supplement 4E). We also found that cLP Treg cells from young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice showed higher expression of CD103 and CTLA-4, but showed decreased expression of the activation markers CD25, CD69, and the terminal differentiation marker KLRG-1 (Cheng et al., 2012) (Figure 2—figure supplement 4F). In addition, intestinal Treg cells from young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice had significantly increased expression of Ki67 and higher levels of phosphorylated S6, suggesting that the majority were in cell cycle (Figure 2—figure supplement 4G–I). Taken together, these results identify a crucial role for autophagy in the maintenance and functional regulation of intestinal Treg cells.

Overall, these results demonstrate that selective ablation of Atg16l1 in T cells led to a decrease in Foxp3+ Treg cells and selective expansion of TH2 cells that preceded the onset of overt pathology. In addition, these perturbations in TH cell subsets were largely limited to the mucosal environment.

Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice exhibit elevated type 2 humoral responses to environmental antigens

We next assessed whether dysregulation in the intestinal Treg and TH2 compartment in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice affected humoral responses. While at the limit of detection in Atg16l1fl/fl controls, serum IgE concentrations were significantly elevated in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice and increased further as the mice aged (Figure 3A). Furthermore, levels of serum IgA and IgG1 in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice were also significantly elevated relative to Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A) and again increased as the Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice aged (Figure 3B). In contrast, levels of isotypes not associated with TH2 help were identical in aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (Figure 3B). Thus, there was a progressive dysregulation of TH2-associated antibody responses in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice. Consistent with these elevated humoral responses, young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice had higher frequencies of germinal center (GC), memory B cells and plasma cells in the spleen and mLN compared to Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B) and markedly enlarged Peyer’s patches were observed in aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (Figure 3C).

Figure 3. Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice develop elevated TH2-associated antibodies against intestinal luminal antigens.

(A) Serum IgE concentrations in cohorts of young and aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were measured by ELISA. (B) Serum antibody IgG1, IgG2b, IgG2c, IgA and IgM isotype levels in aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were measured by ELISA. (C) Representative photomicrographs of H&E stained sections of Peyer’s patch (PP) in the SI (jejunum) of aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates, scale bar 150 μm. (D) Serum levels of Soy-specific IgA, IgG1, IgG2b, IgG2c antibodies in aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were measured by ELISA. (E) Young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were fed with ovalbumin (OVA) alone or with cholera toxin (CT) as described in methods and levels of OVA-specific serum IgE were measured 8 weeks after first challenge by ELISA. (F) Levels of CBir1-specific IgA, IgG1, IgG2b and IgG2c antibodies in serum of aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were measured by ELISA, serum was diluted 50x. Data are representative from at least two independent experiments with at least three mice per group (A-D) or combined from two (E) or three (F) independent experiments with at least three mice per group. Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means (A,D,E,F). Serum isotype levels are shown as mean ± s.e.m (B). Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test (A,D-F) or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons (B), *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. SI – small intestine. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old, aged mice > 5 months old.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.009

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Dysregulated humoral responses in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) Serum antibody IgA and IgG1 isotype levels in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were measured by ELISA. (B) Frequencies of B cells (B220+), germinal center B cells (GC: B220+ GL7+ CD95+), memory B cells (B220+ Gl7- IgM- IgG+) and plasma cells (CD138+) in the spleen and mLN of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on live CD45+ cells). (C) Serum levels of Soy-specific IgA, IgG1, IgG2b, IgG2c antibodies in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were measured by ELISA. (D) Cohorts of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were infected with Helicobacter hepaticus by oral gavage (three feeds of 1x108 CFU) and levels of serum Helicobacter-specific IgG1, IgG2c and IgA antibodies were determined three weeks later by ELISA. (E) Cohorts of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were orally infected with Trichuris muris (200 eggs) and levels of T. muris-specific IgG1 in serum were determined 34 days later by ELISA. Data are from one experiment with at least three mice per group (A-D) or representative from two independent experiments with five mice per group (E). Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means (B,C) or data represent mean ± s.e.m (A,D,E). Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test (A,C) or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons (B,D,E): statistical significance was determined between infected groups (b,c), *p<0.05; **p<0.01. mLN - mesenteric lymph nodes. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old.

Multiple studies have demonstrated the critical role played by Foxp3+ Treg cells in immune tolerance to dietary and microbial antigens within the intestine. Furthermore, changes in intestinal Treg and TH2 responses are associated with food hypersensitivities (Berin and Sampson, 2013). We hypothesized that the aberrant humoral responses in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice might be directed against luminal antigens. Soy is the main protein source in chow, and we detected high levels of anti-soy IgG1 and IgA in sera from aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, whereas these responses were undetectable in control Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (Figure 3D). By contrast, we only detected marginal levels of soy-specific IgG2b or IgG2c in aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 sera (Figure 3D). Importantly, elevated anti-soy IgG1 and IgA antibodies were already present in sera from young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, before the onset of intestinal inflammation (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). Despite the very high levels of total serum IgE in aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, we did not detect elevated levels of anti-soy IgE (data not shown). The absence of soy-specific IgE could be due to the inhibiting effects of persistent exposure to high-dose antigens on IgE responses (Sudowe et al., 1997; Riedl et al., 2005). Therefore, to test whether an IgE response was mounted during transient exposure to low-dose dietary antigens, we fed young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl mice with ovalbumin (OVA), either alone or in combination with the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin (CT). As expected, anti-OVA IgE responses were undetectable in control Atg16l1fl/fl mice fed OVA alone and were only marginally increased by co-administration of CT (Figure 3E). In contrast, Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice exhibited significantly elevated levels of anti-OVA IgE after being fed OVA alone and developed >10-fold higher levels of OVA-specific IgE after feeding of OVA with CT (Figure 3E). Together, these results indicate that Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice displayed aberrant TH2-associated antibody responses towards otherwise innocuous dietary protein antigens.

Besides food antigens, the intestinal lumen harbors vast quantities of commensal-derived antigens. Thus, we measured antibodies directed against the flagellin antigen CBir1, produced by commensal bacteria belonging to Clostridia cluster XIVa, as antibodies against flagellin are readily detected in sera of IBD patients (Lodes et al., 2004). We detected significantly higher levels of CBir1-specific IgG1 and IgA in the serum of aged Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice compared to control Atg16l1fl/fl littermates, whereas anti-CBir1 IgG2b and IgG2c levels were comparable (Figure 3F). Furthermore, CBir1-specific IgG1 and IgA were already detectable in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (data not shown). In contrast, increased TH2 cell-associated antibody responses were not mounted in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice following oral infection either with the Gram-negative bacterium Helicobacter hepaticus or with the nematode parasite Trichuris muris (Figure 3—figure supplement 1D,E). Taken together, these results indicate that the abnormal TH2-associated antibody responses observed in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice preceded the development of overt inflammation and were selectively induced towards commensal microbiota and dietary antigens.

Atg16l1 differentially regulates survival of TH2 and Treg cells

Given apparent opposing effects of Atg16l1 deficiency on TH2 and Treg cells, we questioned whether the disruption of autophagy pathway affects the differentiation of these T cell subsets. We found that, under TH2 or Treg polarizing conditions, differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells isolated from Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl littermates toward the Gata3+ TH2 or Foxp3+ Treg cell phenotype was comparable (Figure 4A–C). As TH2 cytokines can negatively affect Treg differentiation and stability (Dardalhon et al., 2008; Feng et al., 2014), it was possible that outgrowth of TH2 cells may also have contributed to the loss of intestinal Treg in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice. We therefore isolated Foxp3+ Treg cells from Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates and activated them in vitro in the presence of IL-4 and IL-13. However, we did not find any evidence of Treg instability, as expression of Foxp3 and CD25 remained equally high in Atg16l1-deficient and WT Treg cells (Figure 4D).

Figure 4. Atg16l1 promotes survival of Treg cells and limits TH2 cell survival.

Figure 4.

(A,B) Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured in TH0, Treg, or TH2 polarizing conditions for 48 hr and analyzed by FACS. Representative FACS plots show (A) Foxp3 and (B) Gata3 expression (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (C) Frequencies of Treg cells (Foxp3+) and TH2 cells (Gata3+) arising from Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl naïve CD4+ T cells cultured in Treg or TH2 polarizing conditions for 5 days. (D) Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl Treg cells were cultured with anti-CD3 (3 μg/ml) and anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml) for 48 hr, then maintained in the presence of IL-4 and IL-13 for a further 5 days before FACS analysis of Foxp3 and CD25 expression of live CD4+ T cells. (E,F) Naïve Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl CD4+ T cells were cultured with (E) 1 μg/ml or (F) 5 μg/ml anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 (1 μg/ml) for 48 hr in Treg or TH2 polarizing conditions, then maintained in polarizing conditions for a further 5 days before FACS analysis of cell survival. Histograms show gates and frequencies of live CD4+ T cells. (G) Representative FACS plots of viability dye and Annexin V staining of Treg cells and TH2 cells from the cLP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates, gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3+ (left panel), or CD4+ TCRβ+ Gata3+ (right panel). Data are representative from two (D,G) or three independent experiments (A,B,E,F), or are combined from three independent experiments (C). Each dot represents an individual cell culture (C) or data are shown as mean ± s.e.m (A,B,D-F). Numbers indicate percentage of cells in quadrants (G). cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.011

We therefore examined whether autophagy deficiency influenced the survival of TH2 or Foxp3+ Treg cells. Thus, naïve CD4+ T cells isolated from Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were activated for 48 hr with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies and then rested for 5 days. Cells were kept in TH2 or Treg polarizing conditions throughout the experiment. Following activation with different concentrations of anti-CD3 antibody, Atg16l1-deficient TH2 cells exhibited comparable or improved survival relative to WT TH2 cells (Figure 4E,F). In contrast, there was a 50–75% decrease in survival of Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells when compared to Atg16l1-sufficient Treg cells activated under the same conditions (Figure 4E,F). To establish whether autophagy-deficient Treg and TH2 cells exhibited similarly distinct survival profiles in vivo CD4+ T cells isolated from cLP of Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were stained with a viability dye and Annexin V. We observed that an increased proportion of Atg16l1-deficient intestinal Treg cells were dead or dying compared to WT Treg cells (Figure 4G). In contrast, Atg16l1-deficiency had no negative effect on the viability of intestinal TH2 cells, which was comparable to WT controls (Figure 4G). Together, these results indicate that Atg16l1-deficiency does not impair the differentiation or stability of Treg cells and does not promote differentiation towards the TH2 lineage. However, autophagy differentially impacts on the survival of mucosal Treg and TH2 cells.

Autophagy regulates intestinal TH2 responses in a cell-intrinsic manner

As pTreg cells are required to control TH2 responses at mucosal sites (Mucida et al., 2005; Curotto de Lafaille et al., 2008; Josefowicz et al., 2012), we examined whether the enhanced TH2 phenotype in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice could be corrected by reconstitution of the intestinal Foxp3+ Treg compartment. We restored the pTreg population in young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice at the age of 10–12 weeks, before the onset of intestinal pathology, through adoptive transfer of congenic WT naïve CD45.1+ CD4+ T cells. Recipients were sacrificed 3 months later, when control Atg16l1ΔCD4 littermates had developed intestinal inflammation. We detected CD45.1+ donor CD4+ T cells in all adoptively transferred Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, but the level of reconstitution varied by the organ examined. In reconstituted Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, donor WT CD4+ T cells accounted for 37 ± 5% of total CD4+ T cells in spleen and 18 ± 2% in mLN, whereas in the cLP they represented 56 ± 4% (Figure 5A). Thus, autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells had a survival disadvantage when compared to WT CD4+ T cells within the intestinal mucosa. Overall, adoptive transfer of WT naïve CD4+ T cells restored the total frequencies of CD4+ T cells in the cLP to levels comparable to control Atg16l1fl/fl mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A).

Figure 5. Autophagy contributes to the elevated TH2 responses in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice in a cell-intrinsic manner.

Young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (CD45.2+) were adoptively transferred with 4-5x106 naïve WT CD4+ T cells (CD45.1+) and analyzed 3 months later. (A) Frequencies of WT (CD45.1+) and Atg16l1-deficient (CD45.2+) CD4+ T cells in the spleen, mLN and cLP. (B) Frequencies of WT (CD45.1+) and Atg16l1-deficient (CD45.2+) Foxp3+ Treg cells in the spleen, mLN and cLP (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (C) Representative FACS plots showing gating of WT (CD45.1+) and Atg16l1-deficient (CD45.1-) CD4+ T cells and expression of IL-13 (TH2), IFN-γ (TH1) and IL-17A (TH17) in the cLP (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- T cells). (D) Frequencies of WT (CD45.1+) and Atg16l1-deficient (CD45.2+) TH2 (IL-13+), TH1 (IFN- γ+) and TH17 (IL-17A+) cells among CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- T cells in the cLP. (E) Frequencies of WT (CD45.1+) and Atg16l1-deficient (CD45.2+) Gata3+ CD4+ T cells in the spleen, mLN and cLP (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- T cells). (F) SI lengths and (G) representative photomicrographs of jejunum of control untreated Atg16l1fl/fl or Atg16l1ΔCD4 littermates and reconstituted Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, scale bar 150 μm. (H) Serum IgE concentrations in control untreated Atg16l1fl/fl or Atg16l1ΔCD4 littermates and adoptively transferred Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice were measured by ELISA. Data are representative of two independent experiments with at least four mice per group (A-E,G) or combined from two independent experiments (F,H). Each dot represents cells coming from the donor or the hosts within the individual transferred mouse (A,B,D,E) or each dot represents an individual mouse (F,H), horizontal bars denote mean. Numbers indicate percentage of cells in gates. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test, *p<0.05; **p<0.01. mLN - mesenteric lymph nodes, cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 10–12 weeks old.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.012

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Reconstitution of intestinal CD4+ T cell compartments in adoptively transferred Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Young Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (CD45.2+) were adoptively transferred with 4-5x106 naïve WT CD4+ T cells (CD45.1+) i.v. and cLP populations analyzed 3 months later. (A) Frequencies of total CD4+ T cells. (B) Frequencies and total numbers of Foxp3+ Treg cells (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (C) Frequencies and total numbers of TH2 (IL-13+) cells (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- T cells). Data are combined from two independent experiments with at least four mice per group. Each dot represents an individual mouse, horizontal bars denote mean. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test, *p<0.05; **p<0.01. cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 10–12 weeks old.

When we examined Foxp3+ Treg cells, the survival advantage conferred by autophagy was even more apparent, with around 50% of the donor WT naïve CD45.1+ T cells developing into Foxp3+ pTreg cells in spleen, mLN and cLP of Atg16l1ΔCD4 recipients. As a result, the majority of Foxp3+ Treg cells were of WT donor origin (67 ± 5% in spleen, 59 ± 4% in mLN and 80 ± 5% in cLP) (Figure 5B). Thus, adoptive transfer of WT-naïve CD4+ T cells resulted in efficient reconstitution of Foxp3+ pTreg cells in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice; the total frequencies and numbers of Treg cells within the cLP of transferred mice were comparable with control Atg16l1fl/fl mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B). As such, we could utilize this system to determine whether excessive TH2 cell accumulation in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice was due to impaired mucosal pTreg cells or to a cell-intrinsic effect of Atg16l1-deficiency in TH2 cells.

When we analyzed the frequencies of TH2 cells in the cLP of reconstituted Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, we observed significantly higher frequencies of Gata3+ IL-13+ TH2 cells among Atg16l1-deficient CD45.2+ CD4+ T cells compared with the WT donor CD45.1+ CD4+ T cells (Figure 5C–E). Indeed, frequencies of IL-13Atg16l1-deficient CD4+ T cells in the cLP of pTreg-reconstituted mice were comparable to those found in untreated Atg16l1ΔCD4 littermates (Figure 5C,D). In contrast, there was no difference in TH17 cell frequencies between Atg16l1-deficient CD45.2+ and WT CD4+ T cells, and there was a significant decrease in TH1 frequencies among Atg16l1-deficient CD4+ T cells (Figure 5C,D). In line with these observations, adoptively transferred Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice had comparable total frequencies and numbers of TH2 cells as observed in untreated Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 1C). Thus, provision of WT pTreg cells did not rescue the increased TH2 phenotype of Atg16l1-deficient CD4+ T cells, indicating that autophagy directly regulates TH2 cells through a cell-intrinsic mechanism. Consistent with this finding, Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice reconstituted with WT pTreg cells still developed intestinal pathology and elevated serum IgE levels comparable to those present in untreated Atg16l1ΔCD4 littermates (Figure 5F–H).

Autophagy is essential for Treg cell homeostasis and control of effector T cell responses in the gut

Given that Atg16l1-deficiency significantly reduced the number of intestinal Treg cells in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, we hypothesized that Treg cells may be particularly reliant on autophagy compared to other subsets of CD4+ T cells. Indeed, in WT mice we found that levels of autophagy were significantly higher in Foxp3+ Treg cells compared to Foxp3- CD4+ T cells, both constitutively and after TCR activation (Figure 6A,B). Together with our observations of impaired survival of Atg16l1-deficient Foxp3+ Treg cells (Figure 4E–G), this suggested an important cell-intrinsic role for autophagy in the maintenance of Treg cells. This hypothesis was further strengthened by analyses of mixed bone marrow (BM) chimeras where irradiated Rag1-/- mice were reconstituted with a 1:1 mixture of BM cells from Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice and congenic WT C57BL/6mice (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A). In this setting, the reconstitution of CD4+ T cells was severely hampered in the absence of functional autophagy and this deficiency was most pronounced in the Treg compartment of the spleen and cLP (Figure 6—figure supplement 1B–E), confirming that Atg16l1-deficiency decreases the ability of Foxp3+ Treg cells to compete with WT Treg cells in a cell-intrinsic manner.

Figure 6. Aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice develop spontaneous multi-organ inflammation.

(A) LC3+ autophagosome formation by Foxp3- CD4+ T cells and Foxp3+ Treg cells from cLP and mLN of WT mice in unstimulated cells or after overnight activation with α-CD3 (5 μg/ml) and α-CD28 (1 μg/ml). (B) Representative LC3 staining of unstimulated cells (gated on Foxp3+ CD4+ TCRβ+ Treg cells or Foxp3- CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (C) Weight curves and (D) spleen weights and representative images of spleen and mLN of aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (E) Representative photomicrographs of H&E stained sections of liver, spleen, stomach, SI (jejunum), proximal colon and mid-colon of aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates, scale bar 150 μm. (F) Quantification of SI length. Data are combined from two to four independent experiments with two to five mice per group (A,D,F) or are representative of two to three independent experiments with two to five mice per group (B,C,E). Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means (A,D,F). Data shown as mean ± s.e.m (C). Statistical significance was determined using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons (C) or using the Mann–Whitney test (A,D,F), *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. mLN - mesenteric lymph nodes, SI – small intestine lamina propria, cLP – colonic lamina propria. Aged mice >5 months old.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.014

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Impaired reconstitution of mixed bone marrow chimeras by Atg16l1-deficient T cells.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

(A) Experimental design for the generation of mixed bone marrow (BM) chimeras. BM cells isolated from WT (CD45.1+) and Atg16l1fl/fl or Atg16l1ΔCD4 (CD45.2+) mice were injected at a 1:1 ratio into lethally irradiated (1100 Rad) Rag1-/- recipients (total of 1x107 cells per mouse). (B) Representative FACS plots showing frequencies of Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl (CD45.2+) and WT (CD45.2-) CD4+ T cells in the thymus, spleen and cLP of mixed BM chimeras (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (C) Frequencies of Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl (CD45.2+) CD4+ T cells in mixed BM chimeras (shown as percentage of total CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (D) Representative FACS plots and (E) frequencies of Foxp3+ Treg cells derived from Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl (CD45.2+) cells in mixed BM chimeras (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). Highlighted top right quadrants indicate Treg cells derived from Atg16l1fl/fl orAtg16l1ΔCD4 BM. Data are representative from two independent experiments with at least seven mice per group. Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means. Numbers indicate percentage of cells in gates. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
Figure 6—figure supplement 2. Analysis of Atg16l1 expression in Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice.

Figure 6—figure supplement 2.

(A) qPCR analysis of Atg16l1 exon 3 levels in sorted CD4+ Foxp3- T cells and Foxp3+ Treg cells from spleen and cLP of Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Foxp3Cre mice. Data are representative from two independent experiments with 5 mice per group. Atg16l1 exon 3 levels are shown as mean ± s.e.m of three technical replicates, normalised to expression of hprt. cLP – colonic lamina propria.

To definitively assess the cell-intrinsic requirement for autophagy in Foxp3+ Treg cells we crossed Atg16l1fl/fl mice with mice expressing a YFP-Cre from the Foxp3 locus (Foxp3Cre mice) (Rubtsov et al., 2008), generating Atg16l1fl/fl::Foxp3Cre mice (hereafter denoted as Atg16l1ΔFoxp3) in which Atg16l1 is selectively ablated in Foxp3+ Treg cells. These mice allowed us to analyze the consequences of a lack of autophagy in Treg cells in the context of autophagy-competent CD4+ T effector cells. As expected, Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice showed a significant reduction of Atg16l1 expression in Foxp3+ Treg cells, but not in CD4+ Foxp3- T cells (Figure 6—figure supplement 2A). Although Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice appeared normal in early life, at around 5 months of age they developed a severe spontaneous inflammatory disease characterized by progressive weight loss, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy and leukocyte infiltration in multiple tissues (Figure 6C–E). The gastrointestinal tract was particularly affected in aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice, with marked inflammation in the SI and colon (Figure 6E,F). Intestinal inflammation in aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice was characterized by massive accumulation of activated CD4+ T cells in the intestinal LP and mLN (Figure 7A–D and Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). The cLP infiltrate in aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice contained a mixed population of TH1, TH17 and TH2 effector cells, with a significant increase in the frequencies of IL-13+ CD4+ TH2 cells (Figure 7E,F), although this TH2 bias was not present in young Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B). In addition, we observed increased frequencies of Gata3+ CD4+ T cells in the spleen, mLN and cLP of aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice (Figure 7G). Analyses of humoral responses in aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice revealed significantly elevated levels of circulating IgE and IgA, however IgG1 levels were not increased (Figure 7H and Figure 7—figure supplement 1C). Thus, selective ablation of Atg16l1 in Foxp3+ Treg cells led to intestinal inflammation that was characterized by accumulation of all TH effector types, with a disproportionate increase in TH2 responses in aged mice. However, the breadth and magnitude of TH2-associated responses were less pronounced in Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice compared to those observed in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice.

Figure 7. Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice cannot control pro-inflammatory TH effector responses.

(A) Representative immunofluorescence images of small intestine and proximal and mid colon of aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates stained for CD3 (red), β-catenin (green) and DAPI (blue). (B) Frequencies and (C) total numbers of cLP CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells in aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (D) Frequencies of effector (CD44+CD62L-) CD4+ T cells in the mLN and cLP of aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- T cells). (E) Frequencies and (F) total numbers of TH1 (IFN-γ+), TH17 (IL-17A+), TH2 (IL-13+) T cells in the cLP of aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- T cells). (G) Frequencies of Gata3+ CD4+ T cells in aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- T cells). (H) Serum IgE concentrations in Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates were measured by ELISA. Data are combined from two to four independent experiments with two to five mice per group (B-H) or are representative of two independent experiments with two to five mice per group (A). Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. mLN - mesenteric lymph nodes, cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old, aged mice >5 months old.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.017

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Additional characterization of Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

(A) Representative FACS plots of CD44 and CD62L expression by CD4+ T cells from cLP of aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- T cells). (B) Frequencies of TH1 (IFN-γ+), TH17 (IL-17A+), TH2 (IL-13+) T cells in the cLP of young Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- T cells). (C) Serum antibody IgA, IgG1, IgG2b, IgG2c isotype levels in aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. Data are combined from three independent experiments with two to five mice per group (B) or are representative from two to three independent experiments with two to five mice per group (A,C). Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means. Numbers indicate percentage of cells in gates. Data shown as mean ± s.e.m (C). Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test, *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. mLN - mesenteric lymph nodes, cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old, aged mice >5 months old.

When we examined the Treg cell compartment in Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice, we found significantly decreased frequencies of Foxp3+ Treg cells in the spleen and mLN compared to Atg16l1fl/fl littermates, although thymic Treg cell frequencies were similar (Figure 8A). As found in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, intestinal LP Foxp3+ Treg cells were severely depleted in Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice and those remaining exhibited significantly increased expression of effector TH cytokines (Figure 8A,B and Figure 8—figure supplement 1A). Thus, Treg cell-specific deletion of Atg16l1 recapitulated the Treg cell deficits observed in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, showing that cell-intrinsic autophagy is essential for peripheral Treg cell homeostasis, especially in the intestine.

Figure 8. Cell-intrinsic autophagy is required for metabolic adaptation and survival of intestinal Foxp3+ Treg cells.

(A) Foxp3+ Treg cell frequencies among CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells in Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates and (B) representative FACS plots of Foxp3 expression in cLP CD4+ T cells from young Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (C) qPCR analysis of glycolytic gene levels in sorted Foxp3+ Treg cells from spleen and cLP of young Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Foxp3Cre mice (sorted for CD4+ TCRβ+ YFP+). (D) qPCR analysis of FAS and FAO gene levels in Foxp3+ Treg cells from the spleen and cLP of young Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Foxp3Cre mice (sorted for CD4+ TCRβ+ YFP+). FAS: fatty acid synthesis, FAO: fatty acid oxidation, Glut1: glucose transporter 1, Slc16ac: solute carrier family 16 member 3 (lactic acid and pyruvate transporter), Tpi1: triosephosphate isomerase 1, Aldo–α: aldolase α, Ldh-α: lactate dehydrogenase α, Gpi1: Glucose phosphate isomerase 1, Pgk1: Phosphoglycerate kinase 1, Acc1: acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1, Acc2: acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2, Srebf1: sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1, Srebf2: sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 2, Fdft1: farnesyl-diphosphate farnesyltransferase 1, Fabp: Fatty acid-binding protein. Data are representative from two (C,D) or three independent experiments (A,B). Each dot represents individual mouse (A) or data are shown as mean ± s.e.m (C,D). Gene expression levels are shown as mean ± s.e.m of three technical replicates (C,D). Numbers indicate percentage of cells in gates (B). cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.019

Figure 8.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1. Atg16l1-deficient colonic Treg cells exhibit increased cytokine secretion.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1.

(A) Frequencies of IFN-γ+, IL-17A+, IL-4+, IL-13+ Foxp3+ Treg cells in the cLP of aged Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on Foxp3+ CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (B) qPCR analysis of Bcl2, Bim and Bax levels in Foxp3+ Treg cells from young cLP of Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Foxp3Cre mice (sorted for CD4+ TCRβ+ YFP+). Data are combined from three independent experiments with two to five mice per group (A) or are representative from two independent experiments (B). Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means (A). Gene expression levels are shown as mean ± s.e.m of three technical replicates (B). cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old.
Figure 8—figure supplement 2. Increased lipid uptake by intestinal Treg cells.

Figure 8—figure supplement 2.

(A,B) Atg16l1fl/fl and Atg16l1ΔCD4 littermates were injected i.p. with 50 μg of fluorescent 16-carbon fatty acid analog BODIPY C-16 and culled 1 hr later and tissue was collected for analysis by flow cytometry. (A) Representative FACS plots and (B) quantification of C16-Bodipy uptake by Foxp3+ Treg cells in the spleen, mLN and cLP (gated on Foxp3+ CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). (C) Representative FACS plots and (D) quantification of CD36 expression by Foxp3+ Treg cells in the spleen, mLN and cLP of Atg16l1fl/fl and Atg16l1ΔCD4 littermates (gated on Foxp3+ CD4+ TCRβ+ T cells). Data are combined from (B,D) or are representative of (A,C) two independent experiments with 3–5 mice per group. Each dot represents an individual mouse and horizontal bars denote means. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test, *p<0.05. mLN - mesenteric lymph nodes, cLP – colonic lamina propria. Young mice: 8–12 weeks old.
Figure 8—figure supplement 3. TH2 cells exhibit an enhanced glycolytic metabolic profile that is independent of autophagy.

Figure 8—figure supplement 3.

(A) Representative FACS plot and quantification of the cell size (FSC-H) of naïve (CD44- CD62L+) CD4+ T cells from the spleen of Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl littermates. (B) Basal level of oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in naïve (CD44- CD62L+) unstimulated CD4+ T cells isolated from the spleen of Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl littermates measured using the Seahorse metabolic flux analyzer. (C,D) Expression of c-Myc (C) and cell size (D) was analyzed by FACS in Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl CD4+ T cells that were cultured in TH2 or Treg-polarizing conditions for 3 days and rested for one day in the presence of polarizing cytokines. (E) Basal level of OCR and ECAR were measured by Seahorse metabolic flux analyzer in Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl CD4+ T cells cultured in TH2 or Treg- polarizing conditions for 3 days and rested for 2 days in the presence of polarizing cytokines. (F) qPCR analysis of glycolytic gene levels in Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl CD4+ T cells cultured in TH2 or Treg polarizing conditions for 3 days and rested for 1 day in the presence of polarizing cytokines. Data are combined from two independent experiments (A), or are representative of two independent experiments (B-D), or are from one experiment (E,F). Each dot represents an individual mouse (A) or individual cell culture (D). ECAR and OCAR data represent mean ± s.e.m values of T cell populations that were assayed in triplicates or quadruplicates (B,E). Gene expression data of triplicate cultures represent normalized expression values for each gene that were scaled to a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1 (F). Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test (A) or unpaired Student’s t –test (B,D,E), **p<0.01; **p<0.001.

Differential survival of autophagy-deficient Treg cells and TH2 cells is associated with an altered metabolic profile

Finally, we investigated mechanisms that might underlie the striking survival defect of Atg16l1-deficient intestinal Treg cells. Analyses of key regulators of apoptosis revealed that Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells isolated from spleen and cLP had comparable expression of pro-apoptotic (Bim, Bax) and anti-apoptotic (Bcl2) genes as those isolated from control mice (Figure 8—figure supplement 1B). As recent evidence suggests that tissue-resident Treg cell populations may exhibit specialized metabolic adaptations (Burzyn et al., 2013), we compared the expression of metabolic genes by WT and Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells. Analyses of genes involved in glycolysis, fatty acid synthesis (FAS) and fatty acid oxidation (FAO), revealed that Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells had higher expression of glycolytic genes, including Glut1, Slc16a3, Tpi1, Ldh-a, Aldo-a, Gpi1 and Pgk1, than control Treg cells (Figure 8C). Strikingly, this augmented glycolytic signature was much more pronounced in Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells isolated from cLP versus those from the spleen (Figure 8C). Conversely, expression of many key genes involved in FAS/FAO, including Acc1, Acc2, Srebf1, Srebf2, Fdft1, Fabp1, Fabp4 and Fabp5 was markedly decreased in Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells (Figure 8D). Again, these differences were most pronounced in the intestine; WT cLP Treg cells showed increased FAS/FAO gene expression compared to their spleen counterparts, whereas Atg16l1-deficient cLP Treg cells were not able to up-regulate the expression of FAS/FAO genes (Figure 8D). Thus, Atg16l1-deficiency profoundly influenced the expression of metabolic genes in intestinal Treg cells, with an altered balance of glycolytic and FAS/FAO gene expression. Further evidence of increased reliance on lipid metabolism by colonic Treg cells was provided by our observation that Treg cells isolated from the cLP showed markedly increased lipid uptake in comparison to mLN or spleen Treg cells (Figure 8—figure supplement 2A,B). A similar pattern was observed when we assayed expression of CD36, a fatty acid translocase that enhances FA uptake: colonic Treg cells showed increased expression of CD36 compared to splenic and mLN Treg cells (Figure 8—figure supplement 2C,D). Interestingly, we found that Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells showed comparable levels of lipid uptake and CD36 expression as their autophagy-sufficient counterparts (Figure 8—figure supplement 2A–D), suggesting that autophagy does not affect lipid uptake per se but rather affects lipid metabolism.

Together, these results demonstrate that cell-intrinsic autophagy is indispensable for Foxp3+ Treg cell maintenance and function in peripheral tissues, particularly to suppress inflammatory responses within the gastrointestinal tract. Decreased survival of Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells was associated with an altered metabolic profile, suggesting that autophagy plays an integral role in facilitating the metabolic adaptions required for long-term Treg cell survival in the intestine.

We next explored whether autophagy had a general effect on T cell metabolic profile and whether this might explain the differential effects on TH2 cells and Treg cells. Evidence that this might be the case came from our observation that Atg16l1-deficient naïve CD4+ T cells exhibited increased cell size compared with naïve CD4+ T cells isolated from Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (Figure 8—figure supplement 3A). We therefore measured oxygen consumption rate (OCR), which is an indicator of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), an indirect indicator of aerobic glycolysis. We found that Atg16l1-deficient naïve CD4+ T cells exhibited significantly increased OCR and ECAR, metabolic changes that are typically observed in activated CD4+ T cells and are associated with increased aerobic glycolysis (Figure 8—figure supplement 3B).

As TH2 cells have previously been reported to display an increased glycolytic rate compared to other TH subsets (Michalek et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2013), we hypothesized that they may be more resistant to the increased glycolysis that is induced in the absence of autophagy. As it was not possible to sort TH2 cells from the cLP, we performed this analysis on in vitro cultures of TH2 and Treg cells. We found that TH2 cells were larger than Treg cells, expressed higher levels of c-Myc, a critical regulator of metabolic reprograming in activated T cells, and had markedly higher ECAR, all indicative of enhanced aerobic glycolysis (Figure 8—figure supplement 3C–E). Furthermore, while Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells showed higher expression of c-Myc, significantly increased levels of ECAR and OCR, and were larger than their control Atg16l1-sufficient counterparts, we observed constitutively high and comparable levels of glycolysis in Atg16l1-deficient and Atg16l1-sufficient TH2 cells (Figure 8—figure supplement 3C–E). These patterns were recapitulated when expression of key metabolic genes were analyzed; TH2 cells showed high expression of a panel of glycolytic genes irrespective of their autophagy Atg16l1 genotype, whereas Treg cell expression of glycolytic genes was generally lower, unless the Treg cells were autophagy-deficient (Figure 8—figure supplement 3F). Taken together, these results suggest that the enhanced glycolytic metabolism constitutively employed by TH2 cells makes them more resistant to the metabolic changes that occur in the absence of autophagy.

Discussion

The unique challenges of the intestine necessitate complex mechanisms of tolerance and immune regulation to maintain homeostasis (Izcue et al., 2009). As altered mucosal CD4+ T cell responses are implicated in intestinal diseases of increasing prevalence, including food allergies and IBD (Maloy and Powrie, 2011; Berin and Sampson, 2013), it is important to understand the factors that control effector and regulatory T cell homeostasis in the gut. Here, we identify Atg16l1 and autophagy as a new critical pathway regulating intestinal Treg and TH2 responses.

Recent studies addressing the role of autophagy in distinct leukocyte populations have highlighted T cells as being very sensitive to perturbations in the autophagy pathway (Ma et al., 2013). Our data extend these findings by showing that autophagy is particularly important for the survival of CD4+ T cells within the gut environment, as Atg16l1 deletion in T cells led to a severe reduction of CD4+ T cell numbers in the intestinal LP. This deficit was confirmed in mixed bone marrow chimeras, where Atg16l1-deficient CD4+ T cells failed to reconstitute the intestinal LP compartment, and by the rapid outgrowth of adoptively transferred WT CD4+ T cells in the colonic LP of Atg16l1ΔCD4 recipients. However, despite the reduction in intestinal CD4+ T cells, Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice spontaneously developed progressive, chronic intestinal inflammation. To confirm their increased predisposition to develop intestinal pathology, we used an experimental model of IBD triggered by infection with Helicobacter hepaticus and concomitant treatment with anti-IL-10R mAbs (Song-Zhao and Maloy, 2014). This model induces severe typholocolitis that is T cell dependent and displays several features of human IBD pathology and does not require any specific genetic manipulation or chemical barrier disruption. We found increased intestinal pathology in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, confirming that Atg16l1-deficient T cells could mediate potent inflammatory responses in the gut. Thus, selective autophagy deficiency within T cells decreases the competitiveness of these cells and simultaneously predisposes to intestinal inflammation.

We found that Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice exhibited a drastic reduction in Foxp3+ Treg populations in the cLP and SI LP, together with marked changes in intestinal Treg phenotype, including increased cell cycling and aberrant production of TH effector cytokines. The role of autophagy in Foxp3+ Treg cells is not well defined. T cell-specific ablation of Vps34, which encodes a class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase that promotes autophagy, resulted in decreased frequencies of Treg cells in the thymus, spleen and lymph nodes (Parekh et al., 2013). However, as Vps34 also has autophagy-independent functions (Backer, 2008), it was unclear as to what extent these changes were due to impaired autophagy. Furthermore, we did not find any deficit in thymic Treg cell development in Atg16l1-deficient T cells. However, we observed that Treg cells isolated from the mLN and colonic LP had increased levels of autophagy compared to effector T cells, suggesting that autophagy is particularly important for the maintenance of Treg cells in the periphery. Indeed, we demonstrated that cell-intrinsic autophagy is indispensible for the maintenance and function of Foxp3+ Tregcells in the gastrointestinal tract, as selective deletion of Atg16l1 in the Foxp3+ Treg compartment in Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice led to a loss of intestinal Foxp3+ Treg cells and to severe inflammation of the small intestine and colon. In this context, it is pertinent that rapamycin, which induces autophagy through its inhibitory activity on mTOR, has been shown to promote expansion of Treg cells in vitro and in vivo (Pollizzi and Powell, 2015). Similarly, several small-molecule inducers of autophagy were shown to selectively promote the development of Treg cells in vitro (Shaw et al., 2013). Taken together with our findings, these observations suggest that boosting autophagy may represent a rational therapeutic approach to enhance Treg responses in the intestine.

How does autophagy intrinsically regulate Treg cell homeostasis? Our data indicate that autophagy is not required for the differentiation of Foxp3+ Treg cells in vitro or in vivo for thymic generation of Treg cells in vivo. However, we found that Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells showed significantly decreased survival compared to WT Treg cells both in vitro and in vivo. As recent evidence indicates that Treg cells utilize a distinct metabolic program that favors lipid oxidation for energy provision (MacIver et al., 2013), one potential explanation is that autophagy regulates Treg cell metabolism and thereby their survival. Indeed, we found that Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells expressed a distinct metabolic profile to their WT counterparts, exhibiting increased expression of genes involved in glycolysis and reduced expression of genes involved in FAS/FAO. Fatty acid metabolism is emerging as a potent regulator of T cell responses and preferential utilization of FAO has been linked to Treg cell induction (Lochner et al., 2015). Although a recent report indicated that de novo FAS was not required for Foxp3+ Treg cell differentiation (Berod et al., 2014), optimal in vivo Treg cell function was associated with intrinsic lipid synthesis (Zeng et al., 2013). Furthermore, autophagy has been implicated in the regulation of fatty acid metabolism (Singh et al., 2009; Lizaso et al., 2013; Kaur and Debnath, 2015) and recent studies found that autophagy plays a key role in the generation of CD8+ memory T cells (Puleston et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014), which are heavily dependent on FAO for survival (Pearce et al., 2009; O'Sullivan et al., 2014). Thus, autophagy could play a similar survival role in Treg cells, by facilitating the degradation of intracellular lipid stores to release FAs that fuel FAO. Additionally, as degradation of intracellular lipids by autophagy is important to avoid lipotoxicity (Galluzzi et al., 2014), defective autophagy could lead to a toxic build up of intracellular lipids in intestinal Treg cells.

The imbalance between glycolysis and FAS/FAO observed in autophagy-deficient Treg cells could indicate that these cells have stalled in the activated/effector state and are unable to make the metabolic adaptations necessary for long-term survival. This is supported by our data showing that a higher proportion of autophagy-deficient Treg cells appear to be in cell cycle, but they have reduced expression of terminal differentiation markers. Consistent with our findings, a recent study reported that autophagy deficiency in Treg cells resulted in increased mTORC1 activation and glycolysis, leading to phenotypic instability, including expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Wei et al., 2016). However, the molecular mechanism behind decreased survival of autophagy-deficient Treg cells was not elucidated (Wei et al., 2016). It is striking that autophagy deficiency had a more detrimental effect on intestinal Treg cells than on those found in secondary lymphoid organs. Recent evidence suggests that tissue-resident Treg cells undergo tissue-specific adaptations, and metabolic changes are emerging as an important facet of such reprogramming (Burzyn et al., 2013; Liston and Gray, 2014). Taken together, our results suggest that autophagy endows intestinal Treg cells with the metabolic flexibility required to survive in the gut tissue, where essential growth factors may be in short supply (Pearce et al., 2013).

Paralleling decreased Treg responses in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice, we observed a selective expansion of TH2 cells in the intestinal LP that was already present in young mice and preceded the onset of overt pathology. Our subsequent analyses indicated that autophagy limits mucosal TH2 cells through both cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic (Treg-mediated) regulation. One possibility is that Atg16l1-deficient TH2 cells may be somewhat resistant to Treg suppression. However, when we reconstituted pTreg cells in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice we observed a negative correlation between the numbers of intestinal Treg cells and TH2 cells (data not shown), suggesting that autophagy-deficient TH2 cells are partially controlled by Treg cells. Our data strongly suggest that the intrinsic survival advantage of Atg16l-deficient TH2 cells is primarily responsible for their outgrowth in the intestine. Indeed, we observed increased survival of Atg16l1-deficient TH2 cells in vitro, suggesting that autophagy might directly inhibit TH2 cell expansion. This concept is consistent with a previous study that reported enhanced survival of TH2 cells in vitro when autophagy was inhibited and that autophagy mediated death of TH2 cells during growth-factor withdrawal (Li et al., 2006). However, we provide evidence for an additional mechanism that could explain the preferential expansion of Atg16l1-deficient TH2 cells in the intestine, related to the unique ability of TH2 cells to cope with prolonged high levels of glycolysis. Our data contribute to accumulating evidence that a shift toward glycolysis is a general phenomenon observed when the autophagy pathway is perturbed in T cells. We observed characteristic signs of increased glycolysis in Atg16l1-deficient naïve CD4+ T cells and Treg cells, such as increases in cell size, c-Myc levels and expression of glycolytic genes, as well as elevated ECAR. Others have reported a similar glycolytic shift in autophagy-deficient CD8+ memory T cells (Puleston et al., 2014) and Treg cells (Wei et al., 2016). Interestingly, TH2 cells have previously been shown to display an increased glycolytic rate compared to other TH subsets (Michalek et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2013). We confirmed the high levels of constitutive glycolysis in TH2 cells and showed that these were comparable in Atg16l1-deficient and control TH2 cells. Moreover, Gata3 activation was previously linked to induction of glycolysis after TCR activation in T cells, through induction of c-Myc, a critical regulator of metabolic reprograming (Wang et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013; Wan, 2014). We therefore propose that in TH2 cells Gata3 orchestrates metabolic adaptations that enable these cells to cope with prolonged high levels of glycolysis, thus making them resistant to metabolic changes enforced by autophagy deficiency. Overall, our results indicate that autophagy is a key pathway through which TH2 responses are restrained in vivo. A lack of this restraint leads to a gradual loss of tolerance to intestinal antigens, as the excessive TH2 responses in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice led to production of IgG1 and IgA antibodies toward commensal microbiota and dietary antigens that increased with age. Furthermore, Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice developed very high levels of circulating IgE, and mounted de novo IgE antibody responses toward introduced dietary antigen.

As polymorphisms in autophagy genes are linked to IBD susceptibility, our results point towards a novel mechanism that links impaired autophagy to intestinal inflammation through dysregulation of mucosal T cell responses. Previous studies focused on the role of ATG16L1 and autophagy in myeloid cells and the intestinal epithelium. They suggested that impaired autophagy could result in reduced intestinal barrier integrity due to impaired Paneth cell function within the intestinal epithelial layer and elevated cytokine responses by macrophages and dendritic cells (Cadwell et al., 2008; Saitoh et al., 2008; Lassen et al., 2014). Our data add a further layer to the control of intestinal homeostasis by autophagy, by showing that autophagy impairment alters the local T cell compartment and promotes T cell driven intestinal pathology. We present compelling evidence that autophagy deficiency in Treg cells leads to a deficit in intestinal Treg cells and the development of severe intestinal pathology. Although the contribution of the TH2 axis to IBD remains unclear (Strober et al., 2002; Shale et al., 2013), polymorphisms in IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 have been implicated by GWAS in both CD and UC (Van Limbergen et al., 2014) and elevated levels of antibodies recognizing food and commensal antigens have been detected in IBD patients (Lodes et al., 2004; Cai et al., 2014). Moreover, as defective Treg and increased TH2 responses at the mucosa are observed in food allergies and asthma, our findings might also have implications for these conditions. Indeed, epidemiological studies show an overlap between IBD and TH2 driven diseases, such as atopic dermatitis and asthma (Lees et al., 2011). Furthermore, polymorphisms in the essential autophagy gene Atg5 have recently been implicated in asthma susceptibility (Martin et al., 2012; Poon et al., 2012). Autophagy is an attractive therapeutic target and several autophagy modulating compounds are already in clinical trials for the treatment of various disorders (Jiang and Mizushima, 2014). Furthermore, natural dietary-derived compounds, including retinoid acid (Isakson et al., 2010) and vitamin D (Yuk et al., 2009), have been shown to enhance autophagy. Taken together with our results, these findings raise the possibility that activation of autophagy through dietary or pharmacological modulation might have beneficial effects in disorders with a signature of decreased Treg and elevated TH2 responses, including intestinal inflammation and various hypersensitivities.

Materials and methods

Mice

Atg16l1fl/fl mice were generated and provided by the H. Virgin laboratory (Washington University, Saint Louis, MO), as described (Hwang et al., 2012). Atg16l1fl/fl mice were crossed to B6.Cg-Tg(Cd4-cre)1Cwi/BfluJ (CD4-Cre mice) and B6.129(Cg)-Foxp3tm4(YFP/cre)Ayr/J (Foxp3Cre mice, Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME) to generate Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice, respectively. All above strains, together with B6.SJL-CD45.1 (CD45.1+), B6 Rag1-/- (Jackson Laboratory), and B6 Foxp3hCD2 mice (Komatsu et al., 2009) were bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. Unless stated otherwise, mice were analyzed at 8–12 weeks (young mice) or > 5 months of age (aged mice). In the gene expression analysis Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice and Foxp3Cre mice were co-housed and age- and sex- matched. In all other experiments mice used were age- and sex-matched littermates that were kept co-housed throughout the experiments.

T cell-mediated colitis

Experimental T cell-mediated colitis was induced by infection with Helicobacter hepaticus and concomitant IL-10R blockade as described (Song-Zhao and Maloy, 2014). Briefly, mice were infected with H.hepaticus (108 CFU per mouse) by oral gavage on three consecutive days and anti-IL-10R mAb (1B1.2) was administrated via i.p. injection (1 mg per mouse) on the first and seventh day of the infection. Mice were sacrificed 2 weeks after colitis induction.

Histological assessment of intestinal inflammation

Mice were euthanized at indicated time points whereupon tissue sections were fixed in buffered 10% formalin and paraffin-embedded. Sections were then cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Histological analysis of intestinal inflammation was performed as described (Song-Zhao and Maloy, 2014). Briefly, inflammation was graded semi-quantitatively on a scale from 0 to 3, for four criteria; (a) epithelial hyperplasia and goblet cell depletion, (b) lamina propria leukocyte infiltration, (c) area of tissue affected, and (d) markers of severe inflammation, including crypt abscesses, sub- mucosal inflammation, and ulceration. Scores for individual criteria were totaled for an overall inflammation score between 0 and 12.

Isolation of cells and flow cytometry analysis

Cell suspensions were prepared from the thymus, spleen, mLN, bone marrow and intestinal lamina propria as previously described (Uhlig et al., 2006). The following antibodies from eBioscience (Hatfield, UK) were used: anti-CD16/32 (93), anti-CD4 (GK1.5), anti-CD8α (53.6.7), anti-TCRβ (H57-597), anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-CD44 (1M7), anti-CD62L (MEL-14), anti-CD45.1 (A20), anti-CD45.2 (104), anti-CD103 (2E7)), anti-CD69 (H1.2F3), anti-KLRG1 (2F1), anti-CD25 (7D4), anti-CD36 (No.72–1), anti-hCD2 (RPA-2.10), anti-CTLA4 (UC10-4B9), anti-GR.1 (RB6-8C5), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-Siglec F (E50-2440), anti-Gata3 (TWAJ), anti-Foxp3 (FJK-16s), anti-Ki67 (SolA15), anti-Helios (22F6), anti- Bcl2 (10C4), anti-PS6 (cupk43k), anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2), anti-IL-17A (eBio17B7), anti-IL-13 (eBio13A). The following antibodies were from BioLegend (San Diego, CA): anti-CD138 (281–2), anti-CD161 (PK136), anti-F4/80 (BMB), anti-CD11b (M1/70). The following antibodies were from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA): anti-B220 (RA3 6B2), anti-GL7 (GL7), anti-CD95 (Jo2), anti-CD3 (145-2C11), anti-CD19 (1D3), anti-Ly6C (AL-21), anti-Ly6G (1A8), anti-IgM (R6-60.2), anti-IgG1 (A85-1). Anti-c-Myc antibody was from Cell Signaling Technology (D84C12, Danvers, MA). Anti-Neuropilin1 polyclonal antibody was from R&D Systems (FAB566A, Minneapolis, MN). Fixable Viability Dye from eBioscience was used to stain dead cells. Annexin V staining was performed using eBioscience kit (88–08006) according to manufacture instructions. For intracellular cytokine staining cells were stimulated for 3h with PMA (100ng/ml) and Ionomycin (1 µg/ml) in the presence of Brefeldin A (10 µg/ml).

Autophagosome formation detection by flow cytometry was performed using FlowCellect Autophagy LC3 Antibody-based Assay Kit (FCCH100171, Merk-Millipore, Billerica, MA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and following cell surface markers staining. The Autophagy LC3 Antibody-based Assay Kit involves a permeabilization step to wash out cytosolic LC3-I, allowing for antibody-based detection of membrane bound LC3-II. For autophagy detection in WT Treg cells B6 Foxp3hCD2 were used, as this allowed the detection of Foxp3+ Treg cells on the basis of surface expression of hCD2 marker. All data were acquired using a Cyan ADP (Beckman Coulter, High Wycombe, UK) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).

CD4+ T cell purification

Bulk CD4+ T cells were purified from the spleen and mLN by negative selection as previously described (Coccia et al., 2012). Naïve CD4+ T cells were then sorted as CD4+ CD25- CD44- CD62L+. Treg cells were sorted as CD4+ CD25+ when sorted from Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl mice and as CD4+ YFP+ when sorted from Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Foxp3Cre mice. Cells were sorted using an Astrios, Beckman Coulter MoFlo XDP or AriaIII BD Bioscience. Post-sort flow cytometry analyses confirmed that the purity of sorted populations was >97%.

Adoptive transfer of naïve CD4+ T cells

Naïve CD4+ T cells from WT (CD45.1+) mice were sorted as described above and transferred to Atg16l1ΔCD4 recipient (CD45.2+) mice via intravenous injection (4-5x106 cells per mouse). Analysis of spleen, mLN and cLP CD4+ T and Treg cells was performed 3 months after transfer.

Generation of mixed bone marrow chimeras

BM cells were isolated from the tibia and femur of WT (CD45.1+) mice and Atg16l1fl/fl or Atg16l1ΔCD4 (CD45.2+) mice and injected i.v. at 1:1 ratio (a total of 1x107 cells per mouse) into lethally irradiated (1100 Rad, split dose) Rag1-/- recipients. Mice were allowed to reconstitute for at least 8 weeks before analysis.

Immunization with ovalbumin (OVA)

For induction of OVA-specific IgE antibodies two treatment regimes were utilized. For OVA only immunization mice were fed three times by oral gavage with ovalbumin grade VII (5 mg per mouse, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) with 21-day intervals between feeds. For adjuvanted immunization, mice were initially fed with OVA (5 mg per mouse) plus cholera toxin (10 μg per mouse, Biologial Compbell), after which they were fed twice with OVA only (5mg per mouse), with 21-day intervals between feeds.

Infection with Trichuris muris and detection of T. muris-specific IgG1

Mice were orally infected with ~200 Trichuris muris eggs. Serum was collected on day 34-post infection and assayed by ELISA for parasite-specific IgG1. Ninety-six-well plates were coated with 5 μg/ml T. muris excretory/secretory antigen and incubated with serial two-fold diluted serum. Bound IgG1 was detected using biotinylated anti-murine IgG1 (AbD Serotec, Kidlington, UK).

Lipid uptake measurement

Atg16l1fl/fl and Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice were injected i.p. with 50 μg of fluorescent 16-carbon fatty acid analog BODIPY C-16 (Molecular Probes) reconstituted in DMSO. Mice were culled 1 hr later and tissue collected for analysis by flow cytometry.

Metabolic analysis using XF 96 extracellular flux analyzer

The real-time extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) were measured using a XF 96 extracellular flux analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, Billerica, MA). Briefly, naïve (CD62L+CD44-) CD4+ T cells, or in vitro polarized TH2 and Treg cells, were washed twice in assay medium (RPMI 1640 without sodium bicarbonate, 20 mM glucose, 1% FCS, 2mM pyruvate) and seeded at 3–4 x 105 cells per well in assay medium in a 96-well XF plate coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma). T cells were rested for 1 hr at 37°C without CO2 before analysis.

Polarization and stimulation of CD4+ T cell subsets

Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured (3x105 cells/well) in 96-well plates coated with anti-CD3 mAb (5 μg/ml) and soluble anti-CD28 mAb (1 μg/ml) and kept in presence of IL-2 (100 U/ml). For TH0 conditions anti-IL-4 (10 μg/ml) and anti-IFN-γ (10 μg/ml) mAb were added. Cultures were supplemented with IL-12 (10 ng/ml) and anti-IL-4 mAb (10 μg/ml) for TH1 polarization; with IL-4 (20 ng/ml), anti-IFN-γ (20 μg/ml) and anti-IL-12 (10 μg/ml) for TH2 polarization; and with TGF-β1 (5 ng/ml), anti-IFN-γ, anti-IL-4 mAb and anti-IL-12 (all 10 μg/ml) for induced Treg polarization. Sorted Treg cells were activated for 48h with anti-CD3 mAb (5 μg/ml) and soluble anti-CD28 mAb (1 μg/ml) plus IL-2 (100 U/ml) and then cultured with IL-4 (10 ng/ml), IL-13 (10 ng/ml) and IL-2 (100 U/ml) for 5 days. All cytokines were from R&D Systems. Anti-CD3 (145-2C11), anti-CD28 (37.51), anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2), anti-IL-12 (C17.8) and anti-IL-4 (11B11) mAb were from eBioscience. Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 Medium, 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml of Penicillin/Streptomycin, and 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol.

Measurement of serum antibodies and cytokines

All immunoglobulin isotypes except for IgE were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the SBA Clonotyping System (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL). IgE concentration was determined using an anti-mouse IgE ELISA (BioLegend), according to manufacturer's instructions. For the detection of soy-specific, CBir-specific and Helicobacter-specific antibodies ELISA was performed with plates coated with purified soy antigen (5 μg/ml), CBir peptide (10 μg/ml) and soluble Helicobacter antigen (sHel antigen, 10 μg/ml) respectively. sHel antigen was prepared as previously described (Kullberg et al., 1998). For the detection of OVA-specific IgE, a sandwich ELISA was performed with biotinylated-OVA used for detection. MCPT-1 concentrations were measured by ELISA (eBioscience).

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Colonic and small intestine tissue samples were formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and sectioned as per histological analysis. Sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and subjected to sodium citrate-based antigen retrieval, then stained with mouse pAb anti-β-catenin (610153, BD Bioscience), rabbit pAb anti-CD3 (ab5690, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and secondary goat antibodies conjugated to AlexaFluor488 or 555 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Slides were mounted with DAPI-containing Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Images were acquired with an Olympus Fluoview FV1000 confocal microscope and Olympus Fluoview Software (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Western blotting analysis

CD4+ T cells purified by negative selection were lysed in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Protein levels were normalized by Biorad DC protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), resolved by SDS-PAGE and, following transfer onto nitrocellulose membranes, were blotted with anti-LC3 antibody (L7543; Sigma-Aldrich) and anti-tubulin antibody (sc5286, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), and secondary HRP conjugated anti–rabbit antibody (7074S, Cell Signaling Technology).

Fluidigm gene expression analysis

CD4+ T cells and Treg cells were sorted for each population based on surface marker and YFP expression from spleen and cLP of Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 and Foxp3Cre mice. Two hundred cells/population were sorted in triplicates from a total of four (spleen) or six (cLP) mice per group. Alternatively, 250 cells from in vitro polarized populations of TH2 and Treg cells were sorted from triplicate culture wells. RNA was reverse transcribed and cDNA was pre-amplified using the CellsDirect OneStep q-RT kit (Invitrogen). The selected autophagy, apoptotic and metabolic genes were amplified and analyzed for expression using a dynamic 48x48 array (Biomark Fluidigm) as previously described (Tehranchi et al., 2010). Data were analyzed using the 2-∆Ct method, and the results were normalized to actin or HPRTprt expression.

Statistical analysis

For weight curves and antibody titers, p-values were determined by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests. For the metabolic analysis using XF 96 extracellular flux analyzer, p-values were determined using unpaired Student’s t-test. For all other experiments, p-values were determined by nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. Differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05 (*<p0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001). Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism 6 software. For in vivo experiments, sample size was determined by power analysis using power of trial software, which calculates a power value based on X2 test statistics. Calculated required sample sizes were applied whenever possible. No mouse was excluded from the analysis. With the exception of histological assessment of intestinal inflammation, experimenters were not 'blinded' to allocation of animals to experimental groups.

Acknowledgements

We thank Herbert W Virgin and Thaddeus S Stappenbeck for mice with loxP-flanked Atg16l1 alleles, Naren Srinivasan for insight and comments on the manuscript and Duncan Howie, Holm Uhlig and members of the Kevin Maloy and Fiona Powrie groups for helpful discussions and technical help. The analysis of the B cell compartment was carried out using methods developed by the 3i consortium (www.immunophenotyping.org).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Wellcome Trust Graduate Student Scholarship 097112 to Agnieszka Martyna Kabat.

  • Wellcome Trust 100290 to Simon P Forman, Richard K Grencis.

  • Wellcome Trust 100156 to Simon P Forman, Richard K Grencis.

  • Medical Research Council MR/K011898/1 to Johanna Pott, Kevin J Maloy.

  • Wellcome Trust 102972 to Kevin J Maloy.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Author contributions

AMK, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

OJH, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

TR, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

AEM, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

CFP, Assisted in the in vivo experiments, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

AL, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

LA-D, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

SPF, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

RKG, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

QS, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

AKS, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

JP, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

KJM, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures on mice in this study were conducted in accordance with the UK Scientific Procedures Act (1986) under a project license (PPL 30/2872) authorized by the UK Home Office Animal Procedures Committee and approved by the Sir William Dunn School of Pathology Local Ethical Review Committee.

References

  1. Abraham C, Cho JH. Inflammatory Bowel Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;361:2066–2078. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Backer JM. The regulation and function of Class III PI3Ks: novel roles for Vps34. Biochemical Journal. 2008;410:1–17. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berin MC, Sampson HA. Food allergy: an enigmatic epidemic. Trends in Immunology. 2013;34:390–397. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2013.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berod L, Friedrich C, Nandan A, Freitag J, Hagemann S, Harmrolfs K, Sandouk A, Hesse C, Castro CN, Bähre H, Tschirner SK, Gorinski N, Gohmert M, Mayer CT, Huehn J, Ponimaskin E, Abraham W-R, Müller R, Lochner M, Sparwasser T. De novo fatty acid synthesis controls the fate between regulatory T and T helper 17 cells. Nature Medicine. 2014;20:1327–1333. doi: 10.1038/nm.3704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burzyn D, Benoist C, Mathis D. Regulatory T cells in nonlymphoid tissues. Nature Immunology. 2013;14:1007–1013. doi: 10.1038/ni.2683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cadwell K, Liu JY, Brown SL, Miyoshi H, Loh J, Lennerz JK, Kishi C, Kc W, Carrero JA, Hunt S, Stone CD, Brunt EM, Xavier RJ, Sleckman BP, Li E, Mizushima N, Stappenbeck TS, Virgin IV HW. A key role for autophagy and the autophagy gene Atg16l1 in mouse and human intestinal Paneth cells. Nature. 2008;456:259–263. doi: 10.1038/nature07416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cai C, Shen J, Zhao D, Qiao Y, Xu A, Jin S, Ran Z, Zheng Q. Serological Investigation of Food Specific Immunoglobulin G Antibodies in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e12444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng G, Yuan X, Tsai MS, Podack ER, Yu A, Malek TR. IL-2 Receptor Signaling Is Essential for the Development of Klrg1+ Terminally Differentiated T Regulatory Cells. The Journal of Immunology. 2012;189:1780–1791. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coccia M, Harrison OJ, Schiering C, Asquith MJ, Becher B, Powrie F, Maloy KJ. IL-1β mediates chronic intestinal inflammation by promoting the accumulation of IL-17A secreting innate lymphoid cells and CD4(+) Th17 cells. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2012;209:1595–1609. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Curotto de Lafaille MA, Kutchukhidze N, Shen S, Ding Y, Yee H, Lafaille JJ. Adaptive Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cell-Dependent and -Independent Control of Allergic Inflammation. Immunity. 2008;29:114–126. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dardalhon V, Awasthi A, Kwon H, Galileos G, Gao W, Sobel RA, Mitsdoerffer M, Strom TB, Elyaman W, Ho I-C, Khoury S, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK. IL-4 inhibits TGF-β-induced Foxp3+ T cells and, together with TGF-β, generates IL-9+ IL-10+ Foxp3− effector T cells. Nature Immunology. 2008;9:1347–1355. doi: 10.1038/ni.1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Feng Y, Arvey A, Chinen T, van der Veeken J, Gasteiger G, Rudensky AY. Control of the Inheritance of Regulatory T Cell Identity by a cis Element in the Foxp3 Locus. Cell. 2014;158:749–763. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Galluzzi L, Pietrocola F, Levine B, Kroemer G. Metabolic Control of Autophagy. Cell. 2014;159:1263–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hampe J, Franke A, Rosenstiel P, Till A, Teuber M, Huse K, Albrecht M, Mayr G, De La Vega FM, Briggs J, Günther S, Prescott NJ, Onnie CM, Häsler R, Sipos B, Fölsch UR, Lengauer T, Platzer M, Mathew CG, Krawczak M, Schreiber S. A genome-wide association scan of nonsynonymous SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for Crohn disease in ATG16L1. Nature Genetics. 2007;39:207–211. doi: 10.1038/ng1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hwang S, Maloney NS, Bruinsma MW, Goel G, Duan E, Zhang L, Shrestha B, Diamond MS, Dani A, Sosnovtsev SV, Green KY, Lopez-Otin C, Xavier RJ, Thackray LB, Virgin HW. Nondegradative Role of Atg5-Atg12/ Atg16L1 Autophagy Protein Complex in Antiviral Activity of Interferon Gamma. Cell Host & Microbe. 2012;11:397–409. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Isakson P, Bjoras M, Boe SO, Simonsen A. Autophagy contributes to therapy-induced degradation of the PML/RARA oncoprotein. Blood. 2010;116:2324–2331. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-261040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Izcue A, Coombes JL, Powrie F. Regulatory Lymphocytes and Intestinal Inflammation. Annual Review of Immunology. 2009;27:313–338. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jia W, He Y-W. Temporal Regulation of Intracellular Organelle Homeostasis in T Lymphocytes by Autophagy. The Journal of Immunology. 2011;186:5313–5322. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiang P, Mizushima N. Autophagy and human diseases. Cell Research. 2014;24:69–79. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Josefowicz SZ, Niec RE, Kim HY, Treuting P, Chinen T, Zheng Y, Umetsu DT, Rudensky AY. Extrathymically generated regulatory T cells control mucosal TH2 inflammation. Nature. 2012;482:395–399. doi: 10.1038/nature10772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaur J, Debnath J. Autophagy at the crossroads of catabolism and anabolism. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2015;16:461–472. doi: 10.1038/nrm4024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Klionsky DJ, Abdalla FC, Abeliovich H, Abraham RT, Acevedo-Arozena A, Adeli K, Agholme L, Agnello M, Agostinis P, Aguirre-Ghiso JA, Ahn HJ, Ait-Mohamed O, Ait-Si-Ali S, Akematsu T, Akira S, Al-Younes HM, Al-Zeer MA, Albert ML, Albin RL, Alegre-Abarrategui J, Aleo MF, Alirezaei M, Almasan A, Almonte-Becerril M, Amano A, Amaravadi RK, Amarnath S, Amer AO, Andrieu-Abadie N, Anantharam V, Ann DK, Anoopkumar-Dukie S, Aoki H, Apostolova N, Arancia G, Aris JP, Asanuma K, Asare NYO, Ashida H, Askanas V, Askew DS, Auberger P, Baba M, Backues SK, Baehrecke EH, Bahr BA, Bai X-Y, Bailly Y, Baiocchi R, Baldini G, Balduini W, Ballabio A, Bamber BA, Bampton ETW, Juhász G, Bartholomew CR, Bassham DC, Bast RC, Batoko H, Bay B-H, Beau I, Béchet DM, Begley TJ, Behl C, Behrends C, Bekri S, Bellaire B, Bendall LJ, Benetti L, Berliocchi L, Bernardi H, Bernassola F, Besteiro S, Bhatia-Kissova I, Bi X, Biard-Piechaczyk M, Blum JS, Boise LH, Bonaldo P, Boone DL, Bornhauser BC, Bortoluci KR, Bossis I, Bost F, Bourquin J-P, Boya P, Boyer-Guittaut M, Bozhkov PV, Brady NR, Brancolini C, Brech A, Brenman JE, Brennand A, Bresnick EH, Brest P, Bridges D, Bristol ML, Brookes PS, Brown EJ, Brumell JH, Brunetti-Pierri N, Brunk UT, Bulman DE, Bultman SJ, Bultynck G, Burbulla LF, Bursch W, Butchar JP, Buzgariu W, Bydlowski SP, Cadwell K, Cahová M, Cai D, Cai J, Cai Q, Calabretta B, Calvo-Garrido J, Camougrand N, Campanella M, Campos-Salinas J, Candi E, Cao L, Caplan AB, Carding SR, Cardoso SM, Carew JS, Carlin CR, Carmignac V, Carneiro LAM, Carra S, Caruso RA, Casari G, Casas C, Castino R, Cebollero E, Cecconi F, Celli J, Chaachouay H, Chae H-J, Chai C-Y, Chan DC, Chan EY, Chang RC-C, Che C-M, Chen C-C, Chen G-C, Chen G-Q, Chen M, Chen Q, Chen SS-L, Chen W, Chen X, Chen X, Chen X, Chen Y-G, Chen Y, Chen Y, Chen Y-J, Chen Z, Cheng A, Cheng CHK, Cheng Y, Cheong H, Cheong J-H, Cherry S, Chess-Williams R, Cheung ZH, Chevet E, Chiang H-L, Chiarelli R, Chiba T, Chin L-S, Chiou S-H, Chisari FV, Cho CH, Cho D-H, Choi AMK, Choi D, Choi KS, Choi ME, Chouaib S, Choubey D, Choubey V, Chu CT, Chuang T-H, Chueh S-H, Chun T, Chwae Y-J, Chye M-L, Ciarcia R, Ciriolo MR, Clague MJ, Clark RSB, Clarke PGH, Clarke R, Codogno P, Coller HA, Colombo MI, Comincini S, Condello M, Condorelli F, Cookson MR, Coombs GH, Coppens I, Corbalan R, Cossart P, Costelli P, Costes S, Coto-Montes A, Couve E, Coxon FP, Cregg JM, Crespo JL, Cronjé MJ, Cuervo AM, Cullen JJ, Czaja MJ, D'Amelio M, Darfeuille-Michaud A, Davids LM, Davies FE, De Felici M, de Groot JF, de Haan CAM, De Martino L, De Milito A, De Tata V, Debnath J, Degterev A, Dehay B, Delbridge LMD, Demarchi F, Deng YZ, Dengjel J, Dent P, Denton D, Deretic V, Desai SD, Devenish RJ, Di Gioacchino M, Di Paolo G, Di Pietro C, Díaz-Araya G, Díaz-Laviada I, Diaz-Meco MT, Diaz-Nido J, Dikic I, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Ding W-X, Distelhorst CW, Diwan A, Djavaheri-Mergny M, Dokudovskaya S, Dong Z, Dorsey FC, Dosenko V, Dowling JJ, Doxsey S, Dreux M, Drew ME, Duan Q, Duchosal MA, Duff KE, Dugail I, Durbeej M, Duszenko M, Edelstein CL, Edinger AL, Egea G, Eichinger L, Eissa NT, Ekmekcioglu S, El-Deiry WS, Elazar Z, Elgendy M, Ellerby LM, Eng KE, Engelbrecht A-M, Engelender S, Erenpreisa J, Escalante R, Esclatine A, Eskelinen E-L, Espert L, Espina V, Fan H, Fan J, Fan Q-W, Fan Z, Fang S, Fang Y, Fanto M, Fanzani A, Farkas T, Farre J-C, Faure M, Fechheimer M, Feng CG, Feng J, Feng Q, Feng Y, Fésüs L, Feuer R, Figueiredo-Pereira ME, Fimia GM, Fingar DC, Finkbeiner S, Finkel T, Finley KD, Fiorito F, Fisher EA, Fisher PB, Flajolet M, Florez-McClure ML, Florio S, Fon EA, Fornai F, Fortunato F, Fotedar R, Fowler DH, Fox HS, Franco R, Frankel LB, Fransen M, Fuentes JM, Fueyo J, Fujii J, Fujisaki K, Fujita E, Fukuda M, Furukawa RH, Gaestel M, Gailly P, Gajewska M, Galliot B, Galy V, Ganesh S, Ganetzky B, Ganley IG, Gao F-B, Gao GF, Gao J, Garcia L, Garcia-Manero G, Garcia-Marcos M, Garmyn M, Gartel AL, Gatti E, Gautel M, Gawriluk TR, Gegg ME, Geng J, Germain M, Gestwicki JE, Gewirtz DA, Ghavami S, Ghosh P, Giammarioli AM, Giatromanolaki AN, Gibson SB, Gilkerson RW, Ginger ML, Ginsberg HN, Golab J, Goligorsky MS, Golstein P, Gomez-Manzano C, Goncu E, Gongora C, Gonzalez CD, Gonzalez R, González-Estévez C, González-Polo RA, Gonzalez-Rey E, Gorbunov NV, Gorski S, Goruppi S, Gottlieb RA, Gozuacik D, Granato GE, Grant GD, Green KN, Gregorc A, Gros F, Grose C, Grunt TW, Gual P, Guan J-L, Guan K-L, Guichard SM, Gukovskaya AS, Gukovsky I, Gunst J, Gustafsson Åsa B., Halayko AJ, Hale AN, Halonen SK, Hamasaki M, Han F, Han T, Hancock MK, Hansen M, Harada H, Harada M, Hardt SE, Harper JW, Harris AL, Harris J, Harris SD, Hashimoto M, Haspel JA, Hayashi Shin-ichiro, Hazelhurst LA, He C, He Y-W, Hébert M-J, Heidenreich KA, Helfrich MH, Helgason GV, Henske EP, Herman B, Herman PK, Hetz C, Hilfiker S, Hill JA, Hocking LJ, Hofman P, Hofmann TG, Höhfeld J, Holyoake TL, Hong M-H, Hood DA, Hotamisligil GS, Houwerzijl EJ, Høyer-Hansen M, Hu B, Hu Chien-an A., Hu H-M, Hua Y, Huang C, Huang J, Huang S, Huang W-P, Huber TB, Huh W-K, Hung T-H, Hupp TR, Hur GM, Hurley JB, Hussain SNA, Hussey PJ, Hwang JJ, Hwang S, Ichihara A, Ilkhanizadeh S, Inoki K, Into T, Iovane V, Iovanna JL, Ip NY, Isaka Y, Ishida H, Isidoro C, Isobe Ken-ichi, Iwasaki A, Izquierdo M, Izumi Y, Jaakkola PM, Jäättelä M, Jackson GR, Jackson WT, Janji B, Jendrach M, Jeon J-H, Jeung E-B, Jiang H, Jiang H, Jiang JX, Jiang M, Jiang Q, Jiang X, Jiang X, Jiménez A, Jin M, Jin SV, Joe CO, Johansen T, Johnson DE, Johnson GVW, Jones NL, Joseph B, Joseph SK, Joubert AM, Juhász G, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Jung CH, Jung Y-K, Kaarniranta K, Kaasik A, Kabuta T, Kadowaki M, Kågedal K, Kamada Y, Kaminskyy VO, Kampinga HH, Kanamori H, Kang C, Kang KB, Kang KI, Kang R, Kang Y-A, Kanki T, Kanneganti T-D, Kanno H, Kanthasamy AG, Kanthasamy A, Karantza V, Kaushal GP, Kaushik S, Kawazoe Y, Ke P-Y, Kehrl JH, Kelekar A, Kerkhoff C, Kessel DH, Khalil H, Kiel JAKW, Kiger AA, Kihara A, Kim DR, Kim D-H, Kim D-H, Kim E-K, Kim H-R, Kim J-S, Kim JH, Kim JC, Kim JK, Kim PK, Kim SW, Kim Y-S, Kim Y, Kimchi A, Kimmelman AC, King JS, Kinsella TJ, Kirkin V, Kirshenbaum LA, Kitamoto K, Kitazato K, Klein L, Klimecki WT, Klucken J, Knecht E, Ko BCB, Koch JC, Koga H, Koh J-Y, Koh YH, Koike M, Komatsu M, Kominami E, Kong HJ, Kong W-J, Korolchuk VI, Kotake Y, Koukourakis MI, Flores JBK, Kovács AL, Kraft C, Krainc D, Krämer H, Kretz-Remy C, Krichevsky AM, Kroemer G, Krüger R, Krut O, Ktistakis NT, Kuan C-Y, Kucharczyk R, Kumar A, Kumar R, Kumar S, Kundu M, Kung H-J, Kurz T, Kwon HJ, La Spada AR, Lafont F, Lamark T, Landry J, Lane JD, Lapaquette P, Laporte JF, László L, Lavandero S, Lavoie JN, Layfield R, Lazo PA, Le W, Le Cam L, Ledbetter DJ, Lee AJX, Lee B-W, Lee GM, Lee J, lee Ju-hyun, Lee M, Lee M-S, Lee SH, Leeuwenburgh C, Legembre P, Legouis R, Lehmann M, Lei H-Y, Lei Q-Y, Leib DA, Leiro J, Lemasters JJ, Lemoine A, Lesniak MS, Lev D, Levenson VV, Levine B, Levy E, Li F, Li J-L, Li L, Li S, Li W, Li X-J, Li Y-B, Li Y-P, Liang C, Liang Q, Liao Y-F, Liberski PP, Lieberman A, Lim HJ, Lim K-L, Lim K, Lin C-F, Lin F-C, Lin J, Lin JD, Lin K, Lin W-W, Lin W-C, Lin Y-L, Linden R, Lingor P, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Lisanti MP, Liton PB, Liu B, Liu C-F, Liu K, Liu L, Liu QA, Liu W, Liu Y-C, Liu Y, Lockshin RA, Lok C-N, Lonial S, Loos B, Lopez-Berestein G, López-Otín C, Lossi L, Lotze MT, Low P, Lu B, Lu B, Lu B, Lu Z, Luciano F, Lukacs NW, Lund AH, Lynch-Day MA, Ma Y, Macian F, MacKeigan JP, Macleod KF, Madeo F, Maiuri L, Maiuri MC, Malagoli D, Malicdan MCV, Malorni W, Man N, Mandelkow E-M, Manon S, Manov I, Mao K, Mao X, Mao Z, Marambaud P, Marazziti D, Marcel YL, Marchbank K, Marchetti P, Marciniak SJ, Marcondes M, Mardi M, Marfe G, Mariño G, Markaki M, Marten MR, Martin SJ, Martinand-Mari C, Martinet W, Martinez-Vicente M, Masini M, Matarrese P, Matsuo S, Matteoni R, Mayer A, Mazure NM, McConkey DJ, McConnell MJ, McDermott C, McDonald C, McInerney GM, McKenna SL, McLaughlin B, McLean PJ, McMaster CR, McQuibban GA, Meijer AJ, Meisler MH, Meléndez A, Melia TJ, Melino G, Mena MA, Menendez JA, Menna-Barreto RFS, Menon MB, Menzies FM, Mercer CA, Merighi A, Merry DE, Meschini S, Meyer CG, Meyer TF, Miao C-Y, Miao J-Y, Michels PAM, Michiels C, Mijaljica D, Milojkovic A, Minucci S, Miracco C, Miranti CK, Mitroulis I, Miyazawa K, Mizushima N, Mograbi B, Mohseni S, Molero X, Mollereau B, Mollinedo F, Momoi T, Monastyrska I, Monick MM, Monteiro MJ, Moore MN, Mora R, Moreau K, Moreira PI, Moriyasu Y, Moscat J, Mostowy S, Mottram JC, Motyl T, Moussa CE-H, Müller S, Muller S, Münger K, Münz C, Murphy LO, Murphy ME, Musarò A, Mysorekar I, Nagata E, Nagata K, Nahimana A, Nair U, Nakagawa T, Nakahira K, Nakano H, Nakatogawa H, Nanjundan M, Naqvi NI, Narendra DP, Narita M, Navarro M, Nawrocki ST, Nazarko TY, Nemchenko A, Netea MG, Neufeld TP, Ney PA, Nezis IP, Nguyen HP, Nie D, Nishino I, Nislow C, Nixon RA, Noda T, Noegel AA, Nogalska A, Noguchi S, Notterpek L, Novak I, Nozaki T, Nukina N, Nürnberger T, Nyfeler B, Obara K, Oberley TD, Oddo S, Ogawa M, Ohashi T, Okamoto K, Oleinick NL, Oliver FJ, Olsen LJ, Olsson S, Opota O, Osborne TF, Ostrander GK, Otsu K, Ou Jing-hsiung James, Ouimet M, Overholtzer M, Ozpolat B, Paganetti P, Pagnini U, Pallet N, Palmer GE, Palumbo C, Pan T, Panaretakis T, Pandey UB, Papackova Z, Papassideri I, Paris I, Park J, Park OK, Parys JB, Parzych KR, Patschan S, Patterson C, Pattingre S, Pawelek JM, Peng J, Perlmutter DH, Perrotta I, Perry G, Pervaiz S, Peter M, Peters GJ, Petersen M, Petrovski G, Phang JM, Piacentini M, Pierre P, Pierrefite-Carle V, Pierron G, Pinkas-Kramarski R, Piras A, Piri N, Platanias LC, Pöggeler S, Poirot M, Poletti A, Poüs C, Pozuelo-Rubio M, Prætorius-Ibba M, Prasad A, Prescott M, Priault M, Produit-Zengaffinen N, Progulske-Fox A, Proikas-Cezanne T, Przedborski S, Przyklenk K, Puertollano R, Puyal J, Qian S-B, Qin L, Qin Z-H, Quaggin SE, Raben N, Rabinowich H, Rabkin SW, Rahman I, Rami A, Ramm G, Randall G, Randow F, Rao VA, Rathmell JC, Ravikumar B, Ray SK, Reed BH, Reed JC, Reggiori F, Régnier-Vigouroux A, Reichert AS, Reiners, Jr. JJ, Reiter RJ, Ren J, Revuelta JL, Rhodes CJ, Ritis K, Rizzo E, Robbins J, Roberge M, Roca H, Roccheri MC, Rocchi S, Rodemann HP, Rodríguez de Córdoba S, Rohrer B, Roninson IB, Rosen K, Rost-Roszkowska MM, Rouis M, Rouschop KMA, Rovetta F, Rubin BP, Rubinsztein DC, Ruckdeschel K, Rucker EB, Rudich A, Rudolf E, Ruiz-Opazo N, Russo R, Rusten TE, Ryan KM, Ryter SW, Sabatini DM, Sadoshima J, Saha T, Saitoh T, Sakagami H, Sakai Y, Salekdeh GH, Salomoni P, Salvaterra PM, Salvesen G, Salvioli R, Sanchez AMJ, Sánchez-Alcázar JA, Sánchez-Prieto R, Sandri M, Sankar U, Sansanwal P, Santambrogio L, Saran S, Sarkar S, Sarwal M, Sasakawa C, Sasnauskiene A, Sass M, Sato K, Sato M, Schapira AHV, Scharl M, Schätzl HM, Scheper W, Schiaffino S, Schneider C, Schneider ME, Schneider-Stock R, Schoenlein PV, Schorderet DF, Schüller C, Schwartz GK, Scorrano L, Sealy L, Seglen PO, Segura-Aguilar J, Seiliez I, Seleverstov O, Sell C, Seo JB, Separovic D, Setaluri V, Setoguchi T, Settembre C, Shacka JJ, Shanmugam M, Shapiro IM, Shaulian E, Shaw RJ, Shelhamer JH, Shen H-M, Shen W-C, Sheng Z-H, Shi Y, Shibuya K, Shidoji Y, Shieh J-J, Shih C-M, Shimada Y, Shimizu S, Shintani T, Shirihai OS, Shore GC, Sibirny AA, Sidhu SB, Sikorska B, Silva-Zacarin ECM, Simmons A, Simon AK, Simon H-U, Simone C, Simonsen A, Sinclair DA, Singh R, Sinha D, Sinicrope FA, Sirko A, Siu PM, Sivridis E, Skop V, Skulachev VP, Slack RS, Smaili SS, Smith DR, Soengas MS, Soldati T, Song X, Sood AK, Soong TW, Sotgia F, Spector SA, Spies CD, Springer W, Srinivasula SM, Stefanis L, Steffan JS, Stendel R, Stenmark H, Stephanou A, Stern ST, Sternberg C, Stork B, Strålfors P, Subauste CS, Sui X, Sulzer D, Sun J, Sun S-Y, Sun Z-J, Sung JJY, Suzuki K, Suzuki T, Swanson MS, Swanton C, Sweeney ST, Sy L-K, Szabadkai G, Tabas I, Taegtmeyer H, Tafani M, Takács-Vellai K, Takano Y, Takegawa K, Takemura G, Takeshita F, Talbot NJ, Tan KSW, Tanaka K, Tanaka K, Tang D, Tang D, Tanida I, Tannous BA, Tavernarakis N, Taylor GS, Taylor GA, Taylor JP, Terada LS, Terman A, Tettamanti G, Thevissen K, Thompson CB, Thorburn A, Thumm M, Tian F, Tian Y, Tocchini-Valentini G, Tolkovsky AM, Tomino Y, Tönges L, Tooze SA, Tournier C, Tower J, Towns R, Trajkovic V, Travassos LH, Tsai T-F, Tschan MP, Tsubata T, Tsung A, Turk B, Turner LS, Tyagi SC, Uchiyama Y, Ueno T, Umekawa M, Umemiya-Shirafuji R, Unni VK, Vaccaro MI, Valente EM, Van den Berghe G, van der Klei IJ, van Doorn WG, van Dyk LF, van Egmond M, van Grunsven LA, Vandenabeele P, Vandenberghe WP, Vanhorebeek I, Vaquero EC, Velasco G, Vellai T, Vicencio JM, Vierstra RD, Vila M, Vindis C, Viola G, Viscomi MT, Voitsekhovskaja OV, von Haefen C, Votruba M, Wada K, Wade-Martins R, Walker CL, Walsh CM, Walter J, Wan X-B, Wang A, Wang C, Wang D, Wang F, Wang F, Wang G, Wang H, Wang H-G, Wang H-D, Wang J, Wang K, Wang M, Wang RC, Wang X, Wang XJ, Wang Y-J, Wang Y, Wang Z-B, Wang ZC, Wang Z, Wansink DG, Ward DM, Watada H, Waters SL, Webster P, Wei L, Weihl CC, Weiss WA, Welford SM, Wen L-P, Whitehouse CA, Whitton JL, Whitworth AJ, Wileman T, Wiley JW, Wilkinson S, Willbold D, Williams RL, Williamson PR, Wouters BG, Wu C, Wu D-C, Wu WKK, Wyttenbach A, Xavier RJ, Xi Z, Xia P, Xiao G, Xie Z, Xie Z, Xu Da-zhi, Xu J, Xu L, Xu X, Yamamoto A, Yamamoto A, Yamashina S, Yamashita M, Yan X, Yanagida M, Yang D-S, Yang E, Yang J-M, Yang SY, Yang W, Yang WY, Yang Z, Yao M-C, Yao T-P, Yeganeh B, Yen W-L, Yin J-J, Yin X-M, Yoo O-J, Yoon G, Yoon S-Y, Yorimitsu T, Yoshikawa Y, Yoshimori T, Yoshimoto K, You HJ, Youle RJ, Younes A, Yu L, Yu L, Yu S-W, Yu WH, Yuan Z-M, Yue Z, Yun C-H, Yuzaki M, Zabirnyk O, Silva-Zacarin E, Zacks D, Zacksenhaus E, Zaffaroni N, Zakeri Z, Zeh, III HJ, Zeitlin SO, Zhang H, Zhang H-L, Zhang J, Zhang J-P, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang M-Y, Zhang XD, Zhao M, Zhao Y-F, Zhao Y, Zhao ZJ, Zheng X, Zhivotovsky B, Zhong Q, Zhou C-Z, Zhu C, Zhu W-G, Zhu X-F, Zhu X, Zhu Y, Zoladek T, Zong W-X, Zorzano A, Zschocke J, Zuckerbraun B. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8:445–544. doi: 10.4161/auto.19496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Komatsu N, Mariotti-Ferrandiz ME, Wang Y, Malissen B, Waldmann H, Hori S. Heterogeneity of natural Foxp3+ T cells: a committed regulatory T-cell lineage and an uncommitted minor population retaining plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:1903–1908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811556106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kovacs JR, Li C, Yang Q, Li G, Garcia IG, Ju S, Roodman DG, Windle JJ, Zhang X, Lu B. Autophagy promotes T-cell survival through degradation of proteins of the cell death machinery. Cell Death and Differentiation. 2012;19:144–152. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuballa P, Huett A, Rioux JD, Daly MJ, Xavier RJ. Impaired Autophagy of an Intracellular Pathogen Induced by a Crohn's Disease Associated ATG16L1 Variant. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e12444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kullberg MC, Ward JM, Gorelick PL, Caspar P, Hieny S, Cheever A, Jankovic D, Sher A. Helicobacter hepaticus triggers colitis in specific-pathogen-free interleukin-10 (IL-10)-deficient mice through an IL-12- and gamma interferon-dependent mechanism. Infection and Immunity. 1998;66:5157–5166. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.11.5157-5166.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lassen KG, Kuballa P, Conway KL, Patel KK, Becker CE, Peloquin JM, Villablanca EJ, Norman JM, Liu T-C, Heath RJ, Becker ML, Fagbami L, Horn H, Mercer J, Yilmaz OH, Jaffe JD, Shamji AF, Bhan AK, Carr SA, Daly MJ, Virgin HW, Schreiber SL, Stappenbeck TS, Xavier RJ. Atg16L1 T300A variant decreases selective autophagy resulting in altered cytokine signaling and decreased antibacterial defense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111:7741–7746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407001111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lees CW, Barrett JC, Parkes M, Satsangi J. New IBD genetics: common pathways with other diseases. Gut. 2011;60:1739–1753. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.199679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li C, Capan E, Zhao Y, Zhao J, Stolz D, Watkins SC, Jin S, Lu B. Autophagy Is Induced in CD4+ T Cells and Important for the Growth Factor-Withdrawal Cell Death. The Journal of Immunology. 2006;177:5163–5168. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.8.5163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liston A, Gray DHD. Homeostatic control of regulatory T cell diversity. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2014;14:154–165. doi: 10.1038/nri3605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lizaso A, Tan K-T, Lee Y-H. β-adrenergic receptor-stimulated lipolysis requires the RAB7-mediated autolysosomal lipid degradation. Autophagy. 2013;9:1228–1243. doi: 10.4161/auto.24893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lochner M, Berod L, Sparwasser T. Fatty acid metabolism in the regulation of T cell function. Trends in Immunology. 2015;36:81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lodes MJ, Cong Y, Elson CO, Mohamath R, Landers CJ, Targan SR, Fort M, Hershberg RM. Bacterial flagellin is a dominant antigen in Crohn disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2004;113:1296–1306. doi: 10.1172/JCI200420295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ma Y, Galluzzi L, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Autophagy and Cellular Immune Responses. Immunity. 2013;39:211–227. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. MacIver NJ, Michalek RD, Rathmell JC. Metabolic Regulation of T Lymphocytes. Annual Review of Immunology. 2013;31:259–283. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maloy KJ, Powrie F. Intestinal homeostasis and its breakdown in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2011;474:298–306. doi: 10.1038/nature10208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Martin LJ, Gupta J, Jyothula SSSK, Butsch Kovacic M, Biagini Myers JM, Patterson TL, Ericksen MB, He H, Gibson AM, Baye TM, Amirisetty S, Tsoras AM, Sha Y, Eissa NT, Hershey GKK. Functional Variant in the Autophagy-Related 5 Gene Promotor is Associated with Childhood Asthma. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e12444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Michalek RD, Gerriets VA, Jacobs SR, Macintyre AN, MacIver NJ, Mason EF, Sullivan SA, Nichols AG, Rathmell JC. Cutting Edge: Distinct Glycolytic and Lipid Oxidative Metabolic Programs Are Essential for Effector and Regulatory CD4+ T Cell Subsets. The Journal of Immunology. 2011;186:3299–3303. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mizushima N, Kuma A, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto A, Matsubae M, Takao T, Natsume T, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T. Mouse Apg16L, a novel WD-repeat protein, targets to the autophagic isolation membrane with the Apg12-Apg5 conjugate. Journal of Cell Science. 2003;116:1679–1688. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mizushima N. Autophagy: process and function. Genes & Development. 2007;21:2861–2873. doi: 10.1101/gad.1599207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mucida D, Kutchukhidze N, Erazo A, Russo M, Lafaille JJ, Curotto de Lafaille MA. Oral tolerance in the absence of naturally occurring Tregs. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;115:1923–1933. doi: 10.1172/JCI24487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Murthy A, Li Y, Peng I, Reichelt M, Katakam AK, Noubade R, Roose-Girma M, DeVoss J, Diehl L, Graham RR, van Lookeren Campagne M. A Crohn’s disease variant in Atg16l1 enhances its degradation by caspase 3. Nature. 2014;506:456–462. doi: 10.1038/nature13044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. O’Sullivan D, van der Windt GJW, Huang SC-C, Curtis JD, Chang C-H, Buck MD, Qiu J, Smith AM, Lam WY, DiPlato LM, Hsu F-F, Birnbaum MJ, Pearce EJ, Pearce EL. Memory CD8+ T Cells Use Cell-Intrinsic Lipolysis to Support the Metabolic Programming Necessary for Development. Immunity. 2014;41:75–88. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Parekh VV, Wu L, Boyd KL, Williams JA, Gaddy JA, Olivares-Villagomez D, Cover TL, Zong W-X, Zhang J, Van Kaer L. Impaired Autophagy, Defective T Cell Homeostasis, and a Wasting Syndrome in Mice with a T Cell-Specific Deletion of Vps34. The Journal of Immunology. 2013;190:5086–5101. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ, Harms GM, Shen H, Wang L-S, Jones RG, Choi Y. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature. 2009;460:103–107. doi: 10.1038/nature08097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pearce EL, Poffenberger MC, Chang C-H, Jones RG. Fueling Immunity: Insights into Metabolism and Lymphocyte Function. Science. 2013;342:1242454. doi: 10.1126/science.1242454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Plantinga TS, Crisan TO, Oosting M, van de Veerdonk FL, de Jong DJ, Philpott DJ, van der Meer JWM, Girardin SE, Joosten LAB, Netea MG. Crohn's disease-associated ATG16L1 polymorphism modulates pro-inflammatory cytokine responses selectively upon activation of NOD2. Gut. 2011;60:1229–1235. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.228908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pollizzi KN, Powell JD. Regulation of T cells by mTOR: the known knowns and the known unknowns. Trends in Immunology. 2015;36:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Poon A, Eidelman D, Laprise C, Hamid Q. ATG5, autophagy and lung function in asthma. Autophagy. 2012;8:694–695. doi: 10.4161/auto.19315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pua HH, Guo J, Komatsu M, He Y-W. Autophagy Is Essential for Mitochondrial Clearance in Mature T Lymphocytes. The Journal of Immunology. 2009;182:4046–4055. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Puleston DJ, Zhang H, Powell TJ, Lipina E, Sims S, Panse I, Watson AS, Cerundolo V, Townsend ARM, Klenerman P, Simon AK. Autophagy is a critical regulator of memory CD8(+) T cell formation. eLife. 2014;3:e12444. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Riedl MA, Landaw EM, Saxon A, Diaz-Sanchez D. Initial High-Dose Nasal Allergen Exposure Prevents Allergic Sensitization to a Neoantigen. The Journal of Immunology. 2005;174:7440–7445. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.7440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rioux JD, Xavier RJ, Taylor KD, Silverberg MS, Goyette P, Huett A, Green T, Kuballa P, Barmada MM, Datta LW, Shugart YY, Griffiths AM, Targan SR, Ippoliti AF, Bernard E-J, Mei L, Nicolae DL, Regueiro M, Schumm LP, Steinhart AH, Rotter JI, Duerr RH, Cho JH, Daly MJ, Brant SR. Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for Crohn disease and implicates autophagy in disease pathogenesis. Nature Genetics. 2007;39:596–604. doi: 10.1038/ng2032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rubtsov YP, Rasmussen JP, Chi EY, Fontenot J, Castelli L, Ye X, Treuting P, Siewe L, Roers A, Henderson WR, Muller W, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T Cell-Derived Interleukin-10 Limits Inflammation at Environmental Interfaces. Immunity. 2008;28:546–558. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Saitoh T, Fujita N, Jang MH, Uematsu S, Yang B-G, Satoh T, Omori H, Noda T, Yamamoto N, Komatsu M, Tanaka K, Kawai T, Tsujimura T, Takeuchi O, Yoshimori T, Akira S. Loss of the autophagy protein Atg16L1 enhances endotoxin-induced IL-1β production. Nature. 2008;456:264–268. doi: 10.1038/nature07383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schlie K, Westerback A, DeVorkin L, Hughson LR, Brandon JM, MacPherson S, Gadawski I, Townsend KN, Poon VI, Elrick MA, Cote HCF, Abraham N, Wherry EJ, Mizushima N, Lum JJ. Survival of Effector CD8+ T Cells during Influenza Infection Is Dependent on Autophagy. The Journal of Immunology. 2015;194:4277–4286. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Shale M, Schiering C, Powrie F. CD4(+) T-cell subsets in intestinal inflammation. Immunological Reviews. 2013;252:164–182. doi: 10.1111/imr.12039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Shaw SY, Tran K, Castoreno AB, Peloquin JM, Lassen KG, Khor B, Aldrich LN, Tan PH, Graham DB, Kuballa P, Goel G, Daly MJ, Shamji AF, Schreiber SL, Xavier RJ. Selective Modulation of Autophagy, Innate Immunity, and Adaptive Immunity by Small Molecules. ACS Chemical Biology. 2013;8:2724–2733. doi: 10.1021/cb400352d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Singh R, Kaushik S, Wang Y, Xiang Y, Novak I, Komatsu M, Tanaka K, Cuervo AM, Czaja MJ. Autophagy regulates lipid metabolism. Nature. 2009;458:1131–1135. doi: 10.1038/nature07976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Song-Zhao GX, Maloy KJ. Experimental mouse models of T cell-dependent inflammatory bowel disease. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014;1193:199–211. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1212-4_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Stephenson LM, Miller BC, Ng A, Eisenberg J, Zhao Z, Cadwell K, Graham DB, Mizushima NN, Xavier R, Virgin HW, Swat W. Identification of Atg5 -dependent transcriptional changes and increases in mitochondrial mass in Atg5 -deficient T lymphocytes. Autophagy. 2009;5:625–635. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.5.8133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Strober W, Fuss IJ, Blumberg RS. The immunology of mucosal models of inflammation. Annual Review of Immunology. 2002;20:495–549. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sudowe S, Rademaekers  A, Kolsche E. Antigen dose-dependent predominance of either direct or sequential switch'qc in IgE antibody responses. Immunology. 1997;91:464–472. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00268.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tehranchi R, Woll PS, Anderson K, Buza-Vidas N, Mizukami T, Mead AJ, Åstrand-Grundström I, Strömbeck B, Horvat A, Ferry H, Dhanda RS, Hast R, Rydén T, Vyas P, Göhring G, Schlegelberger B, Johansson B, Hellström-Lindberg E, List A, Nilsson L, Jacobsen SEW. Persistent Malignant Stem Cells in del(5q) Myelodysplasia in Remission. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363:1025–1037. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Uhlig HH, Coombes J, Mottet C, Izcue A, Thompson C, Fanger A, Tannapfel A, Fontenot JD, Ramsdell F, Powrie F. Characterization of Foxp3+CD4+CD25+ and IL-10-Secreting CD4+CD25+ T Cells during Cure of Colitis. The Journal of Immunology. 2006;177:5852–5860. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.5852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Van Limbergen J, Radford-Smith G, Satsangi J. Advances in IBD genetics. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2014;11:372–385. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wan YY. GATA3: a master of many trades in immune regulation. Trends in Immunology. 2014;35:233–242. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang R, Dillon CP, Shi LZ, Milasta S, Carter R, Finkelstein D, McCormick LL, Fitzgerald P, Chi H, Munger J, Green DR. The Transcription Factor Myc Controls Metabolic Reprogramming upon T Lymphocyte Activation. Immunity. 2011;35:871–882. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wang Y, Misumi I, Gu A-D, Curtis TA, Su L, Whitmire JK, Wan YY. GATA-3 controls the maintenance and proliferation of T cells downstream of TCR and cytokine signaling. Nature Immunology. 2013;14:714–722. doi: 10.1038/ni.2623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Wei J, Long L, Yang K, Guy C, Shrestha S, Chen Z, Wu C, Vogel P, Neale G, Green DR, Chi H. Autophagy enforces functional integrity of regulatory T cells by coupling environmental cues and metabolic homeostasis. Nature Immunology. 2016;17:277–285. doi: 10.1038/ni.3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Xu X, Araki K, Li S, Han J-H, Ye L, Tan WG, Konieczny BT, Bruinsma MW, Martinez J, Pearce EL, Green DR, Jones DP, Virgin HW, Ahmed R. Autophagy is essential for effector CD8+ T cell survival and memory formation. Nature Immunology. 2014;15:1152–1161. doi: 10.1038/ni.3025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yang K, Shrestha S, Zeng H, Karmaus PWF, Neale G, Vogel P, Guertin DA, Lamb RF, Chi H. T Cell Exit from Quiescence and Differentiation into Th2 Cells Depend on Raptor-mTORC1-Mediated Metabolic Reprogramming. Immunity. 2013;39:1043–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yuk J-M, Shin D-M, Lee H-M, Yang C-S, Jin HS, Kim K-K, Lee Z-W, Lee S-H, Kim J-M, Jo E-K. Vitamin D3 Induces Autophagy in Human Monocytes/Macrophages via Cathelicidin. Cell Host & Microbe. 2009;6:231–243. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zeng H, Yang K, Cloer C, Neale G, Vogel P, Chi H. mTORC1 couples immune signals and metabolic programming to establish Treg-cell function. Nature. 2013;499:485–490. doi: 10.1038/nature12297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
eLife. 2016 Feb 24;5:e12444. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12444.024

Decision letter

Editor: Ivan Dikic1

In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses. A lightly edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the most substantive concerns; minor comments are not usually included.

Thank you for submitting your work entitled "The IBD-associated autophagy gene Atg16l1 differentially regulates Treg and TH2 cells to control intestinal inflammation" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by two peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by Ivan Dikic as the Senior Editor.

The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Vojo Deretic and Janneke Samsom (peer reviewers).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

Summary:

The manuscript describes the role for autophagy in orchestrating intestinal T-cell responses. The authors convincingly show that autophagy is required for maintenance of Foxp3+ Treg in vivo while, on the contrary, autophagy inhibits expansion of TH2 cells. In consequence, defects in autophagy in the CD4 T-cell compartment in vivo cause TH2 pathology by the lack of immune regulation due to reduced numbers of Foxp3 Treg and is aggravated by a direct boosting of TH2 responses. These findings are novel in the field of autophagy and intestinal homeostasis.

Overall, the manuscript is nicely structured, convincing and guides the reader very well.

Essential revisions:

1) From the results describing Figure 5 it does not become clear why reconstitution with WT CD4+ T cells does not partially rescue the phenotype in Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice. On the basis of Figure 5B one would expect that 70% of the WT CD4 are Treg. Why are these cells unable to suppress the expanding Atg16l1 deficient TH2 cells? Are Atg161 deficient TH2 cells not sensitive to suppression by Foxp3+ Treg? This should be investigated in more detail. For example, is this expansion independent of IL-2 and can the Foxp3 Treg therefore not suppress as easily?

2) As noted in the Abstract the role of autophagy in limiting mucosal TH2 expansion was unexpected. Although the authors suggest in the Discussion that Gata3 may promote peripheral T-cell proliferation and maintenance they do not explain how they think this works mechanistically. Are TH2 cells independent of autophagy for their metabolism? Is it possible to study the metabolic function of in vitro differentiated Atg16l1ΔCD4 TH2 and control TH2 cells in a similar experiment as has been performed in Figure 8? How does autophagy inhibit? This should be better explained as expansion of TH2 in Atg16l1ΔCD4 is a major finding in the study.

3) The effects of autophagy on fatty acid metabolism seems to be the best available explanation for the TH2 and Treg disregulation but the experiments are a bit correlative here. The intestinal-specific defect seems to argue against that, although this reviewer does agree with the elegant thinking and correlations by the authors.

[Editors' note: further revisions were requested prior to acceptance, as described below.]

Thank you for resubmitting your work entitled "The IBD-associated autophagy gene Atg16l1 differentially regulates Treg and TH2 cells to control intestinal inflammation" for further consideration at eLife. Your revised article has been favorably evaluated by Ivan Dikic (Senior editor and Reviewing editor). The manuscript has been improved but there are some remaining issues that need to be addressed before acceptance, as outlined below:

The title should provide a clear indication of the biological system under investigation and it should avoid specialist abbreviations and acronyms where possible.

It is recommended to delete IBD from the title if you agree and this does not affect the main message of your paper:

"The autophagy gene Atg16l1 differentially regulates Treg and TH2 cells to control intestinal inflammation"

eLife. 2016 Feb 24;5:e12444. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12444.025

Author response


Essential revisions: 1) From the results describing Figure 5 it does not become clear why reconstitution with WT CD4+ T cells does not partially rescue the phenotype in Atg16l1 δ

CD4 mice. On the basis of Figure 5B one would expect that 70% of the WT CD4 are Treg. Why are these cells unable to suppress the expanding Atg16l1 deficient TH2 cells? Are Atg161 deficient TH2 cells not sensitive to suppression by Foxp3+ Treg? This should be investigated in more detail. For example, is this expansion independent of IL-2 and can the Foxp3 Treg therefore not suppress as easily?

The presentation of the data in the Figure 5 did not make clear to the reader what are the total levels of different T cell subsets in transferred Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice. We have now provided this information (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A-C, and in the subsection “Autophagy regulates intestinal TH2 responses in a cell-intrinsic manner“), which shows that the frequencies and numbers of Treg cells in reconstituted Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice are equivalent to those found in control Atg16l1fl/fl mice. Therefore, although 70% of the total Treg cells in the adoptively transferred Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice are of WT origin, the total Treg cell levels are comparable with control Atg16l1fl/fl mice.

To address whether autophagy-deficient TH2 cells were resistant to Treg cell suppression, we examined whether there was any correlation between the frequencies of Atg16l1-deficient-TH2 cells and Treg cells in the cLP of adoptively transferred Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice. This revealed a negative correlation, i.e. mice with higher levels of intestinal Treg cells had the lowest levels of Atg16l1-deficient-TH2 cells (data not shown), suggesting that autophagy-deficient TH2 cells may be restricted to some extent by WT Treg cells. However, the key conclusion from the data presented in Figure 5 (together with the supplemental data described above), is that despite efficient reconstitution of the Treg cell compartment, the adoptively transferred Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice still develop increased frequencies of autophagy-deficient TH2 cells. The simplest explanation for this result is that autophagy regulates TH2 cell accumulation in cell-intrinsic manner. This is supported by the results in Figure 4 showing that autophagy-deficient TH2 cells exhibit increased survival compared to WT TH2 cells. However, we cannot completely rule out the reviewer's suggestion that autophagy-deficient TH2 cells might be somewhat resistant to inhibition by Treg cells in the cLP in vivo and we therefore discuss this possibility in the Discussion.

To investigate whether autophagy-deficient TH2 cells might proliferate in an IL-2-independent manner, we assessed expression of IL-2Ra (CD25) on TH2 cells in the cLP of Atg16l1ΔCD4 mice and control mice. As shown below, we found comparable levels of CD25 on Atg16l1-deficient and WT TH2 cells in the cLP, as well as on polarized WT and Atg16l1-deficient TH2 cells in vitro. Furthermore, IL-2-driven STAT5 activation has been shown to contribute to TH2 lineage commitment (Zhu et al., Immunity, 2003; Liao et al., Nat. Immunol., 2008). Therefore, we think it unlikely that Atg16l1-deficient TH2 cells would develop or expand in an IL-2-independent manner.

Author response image 1. Autophagy deficiency does not influence expression of IL-2 receptor on TH2 cells (A) Expression of IL-2Ra (CD25) by TH2cells in the cLP of young Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1fl/fl littermates (gated on CD4+ TCRβ+ Foxp3- Gata3+ T cells), data are representative of two independent experiments.

Author response image 1.

(B) Expression of CD25 was measured in naïve Atg16l1ΔCD4 or Atg16l1fl/fl CD4+ T cells cultured with anti-CD3 (5μg/ml) and anti-CD28 (1μg/ml) in TH2 polarizing conditions for 2 or 5 days, data are from one experiment.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12444.023

2) As noted in the Abstract the role of autophagy in limiting mucosal TH2 expansion was unexpected. Although the authors suggest in the Discussion that Gata3 may promote peripheral T-cell proliferation and maintenance they do not explain how they think this works mechanistically. Are TH2 cells independent of autophagy for their metabolism? Is it possible to study the metabolic function of in vitro differentiated Atg16l1 δ CD4 TH2 and control TH2 cells in a similar experiment as has been performed in Figure 8? How does autophagy inhibit? This should be better explained as expansion of TH2 in Atg16l1 δ

CD4 is a major finding in the study.

The reviewers bring up a very interesting point and we have now performed additional experiments to compare the metabolic status of Atg16l1-deficient and WT Th2 cells. Our data in Figure 8 show increased expression of glycolytic genes in Atg16l1-deficient Treg cells and recent studies reported similar glycolytic changes in autophagy-deficient T cells (Puleston et al., 2014; Wei et al., 2016). Thus, a consistent theme emerges whereby autophagy perturbation results in increased glycolytic metabolism in T cells. We therefore investigated the hypothesis that this glycolytic shift in autophagy-deficient CD4+ T cells negatively impacts on their survival, with the exception of TH2 cells, as previous publications suggested that TH2 cells have higher levels of glycolysis (Michalek et al., 2011). As it was not possible to isolate viable intestinal TH2 cells to perform comparative analysis of metabolic gene expression (as we were able to do with the Treg cells that expressed a YFP marker), we analysed in vitro polarised TH2 cells. We confirmed that TH2 cells were highly glycolytic and found that this was independent of autophagy (Figure 8—figure supplement 3, and the last two paragraphs of the Results section). Mechanistically, we suggest that this highly glycolytic state is orchestrated by Gata3, which may enhance glycolysis through direct effects on c-Myc (Wang, 2013) and we found high levels of c-Myc expression in TH2 cells (Figure 8—figure supplement 3C). As discussed in the Discussion section, we believe that TH2 cells are uniquely able to cope with prolonged high levels of glycolysis, and this may explain why they have a clear survival advantage over other T cells in the context of autophagy-deficiency.

3) The effects of autophagy on fatty acid metabolism seems to be the best available explanation for the TH2 and Treg disregulation but the experiments are a bit correlative here. The intestinal-specific defect seems to argue against that, although this reviewer does agree with the elegant thinking and correlations by the authors.

We would like to argue that intestinal-specific defect fits with our observations and hypothesis. We saw the most striking defect in Treg populations in the colonic LP in both Atg16l1ΔCD4 and Atg16l1ΔFoxp3 mice (Figure 2B, C) and this is the same site where we observed that control Treg cells had increased expression of genes implicated in lipid metabolism (Figure 8D). To further support this observation we used an in vivo assay to measure lipid uptake by intestinal and systemic Treg cells. We also measured their expression of the fatty acid translocase CD36. As shown in Figure 8—figure supplement 2 (described in the subsection “Differential survival of autophagy-deficient Treg cells and TH2 cells is associated with an altered metabolic profile”), we found increased uptake of the fluorescent C16 lipid analogue and increased CD36 expression by colonic LP Treg cells when compared with Treg cells from the mLN and spleen. This further suggests that colonic Treg cells are more adapted for lipid metabolism. Interestingly, short chain fatty acids (SCFA) produced by commensal bacteria were shown to facilitate pTreg induction and to increase proliferation of intestinal Treg cells. Although this was attributed to regulation of Foxp3 expression 8,9, our results tempt us to speculate that some of the beneficial effects could be due to SCFA acting as a metabolic fuel for intestinal Treg cells.

[Editors' note: further revisions were requested prior to acceptance, as described below.]

The manuscript has been improved but there are some remaining issues that need to be addressed before acceptance, as outlined below: The title should provide a clear indication of the biological system under investigation and it should avoid specialist abbreviations and acronyms where possible. It is recommended to delete IBD from the title if you agree and this does not affect the main message of your paper: "The autophagy gene Atg16l1 differentially regulates Treg and TH2 cells to control intestinal inflammation"

I can confirm that we have now made this change to the title, which now reads,

“The autophagy gene Atg16l1 differentially regulates Treg and TH2 cells to control intestinal inflammation”.


Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

RESOURCES