Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2016 Feb 18;100:181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.030

Table 4.

Linear regression analyses evaluating the relationship between child EAH%-total and EAH%-sweet with parenting style scores (CRPBI-30).

	EAH(%)-Total^a				EAH(%)-Sweet^b

	B	SE	β	CI^c	B	SE	β	CI^c
Acceptance	−.002	.003	−.062	−.009 to .004	−.001	.003	−.041	−.007 to .005
Psychological Control	.006	.003	.213^*	.000 to .011	.005	.003	.182	−.001 to .010
Firm control	.002	.004	−.056	−.009 to .005	−.003	.003	−.090	−.010 to .004

^a

Child sex and dinner calories included as covariates in model.

^b

Dinner calories included as covariate in model.

^c

95% Confidence interval for B coefficient.

^*

p < .05