Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Oct 9;67(2):209–217. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.08.022

Biomarkers of Kidney Injury Among Nicaraguan Sugarcane Workers

Rebecca L Laws 1, Daniel R Brooks 2, Juan José Amador 2, Daniel E Weiner 3, James S Kaufman 4, Oriana Ramírez-Rubio 2,5, Alejandro Riefkohl 2, Madeleine K Scammell 1, Damaris López-Pilarte 2, José Marcel Sánchez 2, Chirag R Parikh 6,7, Michael D McClean 1
PMCID: PMC4801230  NIHMSID: NIHMS765467  PMID: 26454687

Abstract

Background

In Central America, an epidemic of chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology disproportionately affects young, male agricultural workers.

Study Design

Longitudinal cohort study.

Setting & Participants

284 sugarcane workers in seven jobs were recruited from one company in northwestern Nicaragua. Blood and urine samples were collected before and near the end of the six-month harvest season.

Predictors

Job category (cane cutter, seeder, seed cutter, agrichemical applicator, irrigator, driver, factory worker); self-reported water and electrolyte solution intake.

Outcomes & Measurements

Change in urinary kidney injury biomarkers normalized to urine creatinine, including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), interleukin 18 (IL-18), N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (NAG), and albumin; serum creatinine–based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Results

Mean eGFR was 113 mL/min/1.73 m2 and less than 5% of workers had albuminuria, field workers had increases in NGAL and IL-18 that were 1.49 (95% CI, 1.06-2.09) and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.12-2.31) times as high, respectively, as in non-field workers. Cane cutters and irrigators had the greatest increase in NGAL during the harvest, while cane cutters and seeders had the greatest increase in IL-18. Consumption of electrolyte solution was associated with lower mean NGAL and NAG among cane cutters and lower mean IL-18 and NAG among seed cutters; however, there was no overall effect of hydration among all workers. On average, workers with the largest increases in NGAL and NAG during the harvest had declines in eGFR of 4.6 (95% CI, −8.2 to −1.0) and 3.1 (95% CI, −6.7 to 0.6) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively.

Limitations

Surrogate exposure measure, loss-to-follow-up.

Conclusions

Results are consistent with the hypothesis that occupational heat stress and volume depletion may be associated with development of kidney disease, and future studies should directly measure these occupational factors. The presence of urine tubular injury markers supports a tubulointerstitial disease that could occur with repeated tubular injury.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease (CKD), Mesoamerican Nephropathy (MeN), Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), Interleukin 18 (IL-18), N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (NAG), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), Tubulointerstitial, urine tubular injury biomarker, Acute kidney injury (AKI), volume depletion, heat stress, renal disease etiology, occupational safety


There is an epidemic of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Central America, which is referred to as Mesoamerican nephropathy.1 This disease disproportionately affects young, male agricultural workers and is not associated with traditional causes of CKD such as diabetes and hypertension.2-7 The infrequent presence of high levels of proteinuria suggests that the disease is mainly tubulointerstitial in nature.7-13 Age-adjusted mortality rates from kidney disease in El Salvador and Nicaragua are among the highest in the world.14 In these countries, the prevalence of reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (<60 mL/min/1.73m2) in affected communities is 12%-18% in the general population and 14%-26% in men,8-12 with age-specific rates among younger men up to 15 times higher than in the United States.8

Hypothesized causal agents include agrichemicals, heat stress, heavy metals, nephrotoxic medications, systemic infections like leptospirosis, and genetic factors.4,5,15,16 The etiology of Mesoamerican nephropathy is presumed to be multifactorial,2,5,17 and, although specific causes have not yet been identified, there is support for one or more risk factors being occupational.13 Some studies have suggested that workers in occupations related to sugarcane cultivation, which require heavy manual labor in high ambient temperatures, may be particularly at risk.10,12,13

We have previously shown that sugarcane workers performing the most strenuous tasks had the greatest increases in serum creatinine during one harvest.13 However, serum creatinine is not a sufficiently sensitive marker of early kidney injury, since a measurable change may be evident only after substantial damage has occurred.18-21 Several novel biomarkers of kidney injury have been identified, including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), interleukin 18 (IL-18), and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (NAG). A 22-kDa protein, NGAL is highly upregulated and released into plasma and urine following distal tubule injury.18,22-24 A pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-18 is produced by immune and non-immune cells and is excreted in the urine following ischemic proximal tubule injury.22,25-27 Similarly, NAG, a lysosomal enzyme, is shed into the urine following proximal tubular epithelial cell injury and is indicative of structural damage.19,22,24 These biomarkers may be useful tools for earlier diagnosis of clinically relevant acute kidney injury (AKI), as well as for localization of injury to a specific site in the nephron.19,20,22 Furthermore, they may be useful for monitoring disease progression and severity.18,19,23,28

The goal of this study was to assess whether job category and self-reported hydration are related to short-term changes in biomarkers of tubular injury in workers at risk for developing Mesoamerican nephropathy. Accordingly, we (1) evaluated changes in biomarkers of kidney injury in sugarcane workers in northwestern Nicaragua during the six-month harvest season; (2) assessed job-specific differences in changes in kidney injury; (3) evaluated relationships between changes in biomarkers of kidney injury and eGFR; and (4) explored associations between self-reported hydration and biomarkers of kidney injury.

METHODS

Study Design

The study design and population have been previously described.13 Briefly, the population included sugarcane workers employed by one company in northwestern Nicaragua. We enrolled participants (n=1249) prior to the harvest season (October 2010–December 2010) at a screening conducted by the company, which aims to identify – so as not to hire -- workers with serum creatinine levels ≥1.4 mg/dL. Four to six months later, near the end of the harvest season (March 2011–May 2011), we re-sampled 506 of these workers (Figure S1, available as online supplementary material). Both assessments included collection of blood and urine and information about personal characteristics, occupational history, and work practices. Information about typical hydration practices during the harvest was collected at late-harvest only; workers were asked to self-report the quantity of water and electrolyte solution packets (100 mL, distributed by the company) consumed during a typical workday.

As described previously13 and outlined in Figure S1, a subset of the 506 workers sampled at pre- and late-harvest was included in the final study population (n=284). These workers represented seven job categories: cane cutter, seeder, seed cutter, agrichemical applicator, irrigator, driver, and factory worker (Table S1). Our goal was to select jobs that reflected exposures hypothesized to cause Mesoamerican nephropathy. For each job, we determined the likelihood of exposure to putative causal agents, relative to other jobs, based on an industrial hygiene assessment (Table S1).29

The Institutional Review Boards at the Boston University Medical Center and the Nicaraguan Ministry of Health approved study protocols. All participants provided informed consent prior to participation in research activities.

Biomarkers of Kidney Function and Injury

Immediately following collection, biological samples were processed and stored at −20°C. Within one week, samples were transported to the ISO-certified Centro Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia (CNDR) in Managua, a division within the Ministry of Health (MINSA), and stored at −80°C until analysis. Samples collected pre-harvest were stored for approximately 6-7 months, while those collected late-harvest were stored for approximately 1-3 months prior to analysis.

Serum creatinine was measured at CNDR using a kinetic-rate Jaffe method; 0.2 mg/dL was subtracted from results to calibrate to an isotope-dilution mass spectrometry standard. Urine samples were analyzed at the Division of Nephrology and Hypertension at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center for creatinine, albumin, NGAL, IL-18, and NAG. Urine creatinine was measured using a colorimetric modification of the Jaffe reaction. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 2.4%, and the inter-assay CV was 4.2%. Urine albumin was measured using immunoturbidimetry; intra- and inter-assay CVs were 2.9% and 5.9%, respectively. Commercially available ELISA kits were used to measure NGAL (Bioporto, Gentofte, Denmark) and IL-18 (MBL, Intl., Woburn, MA) per manufacturer’s instructions. The intra- and interassay CVs for NGAL and IL-18 were 2.1% and 7.5% and 9.1% and 7.3%, respectively. The NAG activity was measured with a colorimetric assay (Roche Diagnostics, USA) with method intra- and inter-assay CVs of 4.3% and 6.0%, respectively.30 The detection limits were 1.3 mg/L for urine albumin, 1.6 pg/mL for NGAL, 4 pg/mL for IL-18, and 0.003 U/L for NAG.

Statistical Analyses

For values below the limit of detection, we substituted limit of detection/√2. To account for urine concentration, we normalized biomarkers of kidney damage to urinary creatinine concentration (in g/L) and expressed as follows: albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) (mg/g), NGAL (μg/g), IL-18 (ng/g), and NAG (U/g). We used the CKD-EPI (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine equation to calculate eGFR, considering race as “non-black”.31 We examined the distribution of each biomarker using histograms and other graphical displays as well as summary statistics. To satisfy normality assumptions, biomarkers that exhibited a log-normal distribution were natural log (ln)-transformed prior to analyses.

We evaluated the association between job category and each biomarker of kidney injury using linear mixed effects models with an unstructured covariance matrix. In the first set of models, the primary predictor of interest was ‘field worker’ (reference: non-field worker). In the second set of models, the ‘job category’ variable was the independent variable (reference: factory workers). To assess differences by job in the change in each biomarker during the harvest, we included an interaction term between the predictor of interest and time. We also tested whether the change in each biomarker was different by sex. To evaluate differences between biomarkers at pre- and late-harvest, we used paired t-tests stratified by sex and job. We performed Spearman rank correlations to assess relationships between biomarkers of kidney injury and eGFR. We also performed multivariable linear regression models to determine whether change in eGFR (calculated by subtracting each pre-harvest measurement from the corresponding late-harvest measurement) was associated with change in biomarkers of kidney injury (categorized into tertiles).

To test for residual confounding by exposures associated with sex or field worker status, we performed sensitivity analyses restricted to men and to field workers. We also conducted sensitivity analyses further controlling for eGFR and ACR.

Additional predictors included self-reported daily water and electrolyte solution intake during the harvest. We explored the effect of hydration on kidney injury at late-harvest, overall, and within job categories, using multivariable linear regression models controlling for the pre-harvest biomarker value. We also included sex, age, and years worked at the company in all adjusted models. We analyzed data using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS Institute Inc, version 9.3, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Description of Study Population

Men constituted the majority of the study population (88%), with women employed as seeders, seed cutters, and factory workers only (Table 1). The mean age of workers was 33.6 (range, 18-63) years, while mean duration of employment at the company was 9.4 (range, <1-40) years. Workers reported drinking an average 5.1 liters of water and 2.4 electrolyte solution packets while at work each day (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics and baseline kidney function of study population by job

Participants Overall Field Worker Non – Field Worker
Cane
cutter
Seeder Seed cutter Agrichemical
applicator
Irrigator Driver Factory
worker
No. (%) 284 (100%) 51 (18%) 36 (13%) 19 (7%) 29 (10%) 49 (17%) 41 (14%) 59 (21%)
Characteristics
 Male sex 251 (88%) 51 (100%) 15 (42%) 9 (47%) 29 (100%) 49 (100%) 41 (100%) 57 (97%)
 Age (y) 33.6 ±10.4 30.5 ± 10.6 30.2 ± 8.7 30.3 ± 9.2 34.7 ± 8.2 30.3 ± 8.8 40.9 ± 11.2 36.5 ± 9.8
 Duration working at company (y) 9.4 ± 9.0 3.6 ± 5.3 4.9 ± 4.8 3.7 ± 4.4 12.0 ± 8.0 9.7 ± 8.0 14.4 ± 8.9 14.2 ± 10.6
 Water per day (L) 5.1 ± 2.2 6.3 ± 2.8 4.4 ± 2.2 5.8 ± 2.4 4.6 ± 1.8 6.3 ± 1.9 4.6 ± 1.6 4.0 ± 1.7
 Electrolyte solution packets per daya 2.4 ± 1.9 3.6 ± 1.4 2.0 ± 1.5 2.5 ± 1.5 3.5 ± 1.9 2.3 ± 1.6 0.4 ± 1.2 2.7 ± 2.0
Kidney function at preharvest
 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 114 ± 17 111 ±18 118 ± 19 116 ± 18 116 ± 14 120 ± 14 106 ± 17 113 ± 16
 ACR (mg/g) 2.9 ± 3.5 3.8 ± 4.3 4.5 ± 4.4 2.9 ± 2.3 2.4 ± 4.5 2.2 ± 3.6 3.0 ± 2.7 2.5 ± 2.7
 eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 1 (0.4%) 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 ACR >30 mg/g 12 (4%) 3 (6%) 4 (11%) 0 (0%) 2 (7%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%) 0 (0%)

Note: Values for categorical variables are given as number (percentage); values for continuous variables are given as mean ± standard deviation, with the exception of ACR, which is given as geometric mean ± geometric standard deviation.

Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio.

a

Each packet is 100 mL.

Biomarkers of kidney injury and function were normally distributed after natural log transformation, with the exception of eGFR, which was normally distributed. The overall late-harvest geometric means of NGAL, IL-18, and NAG normalized to urine creatinine were, respectively, 10.4 μg/g, 8.8 ng/g, and 0.90 U/g in men and 25.0 μg/g, 25.1 ng/g, and 1.26 U/g in women (Table 2). Comparisons of pre-harvest to late-harvest measurements indicated that, on average, NGAL increased during the harvest in men; this was driven by increases in cane cutters and irrigators. Levels of NAG decreased during the harvest in men, driven primarily by the decrease in factory workers (Table 2). Summary statistics for non-normalized biomarkers, as well as for urine creatinine, are presented in Table S2.

Table 2.

Creatinine-normalized biomarkers of kidney injury and function among sugarcane workers at pre- and late-harvest time points, stratified by sex

No. NGAL (μg/g)a
IL-18 (ng/g)a
NAG (U/g)a
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)b
ACR (mg/g)a
Pre Late P Pre Late P Pre Late P Pre Late P Pre Late P

Male
 Overall 251 7.5 10.4 <0.001 9.0 8.8 0.7 1.32 0.90 <0.001 113 112 0.3 2.8 2.4 0.07
 Job
  Cane cutter 51 7.6 19.3 <0.001 9.1 12.6 0.1 1.17 1.54 0.08 111 108 0.3 3.8 2.0 0.01
  Seeder 15 10.4 15.3 0.3 5.9 14.8 0.08 1.22 1.61 0.2 115 110 0.4 4.3 6.6 0.2
  Seed cutter 9 10.1 6.2 0.01 9.2 5.4 0.4 1.54 0.63 0.05 119 112 0.08 3.0 1.0 0.02
  Agrichemical applicator 29 7.0 6.9 0.9 9.7 8.5 0.6 1.09 0.93 0.6 116 114 0.1 2.4 2.7 0.8
  Irrigator 49 7.2 14.7 <0.001 6.8 7.5 0.6 0.92 0.90 0.9 120 116 0.006 2.2 4.2 <0.001
  Driver 41 6.9 7.5 0.8 14.0 9.9 0.2 1.27 0.69 0.07 106 110 0.003 3.0 2.0 0.08
  Factory worker 57 7.2 6.8 0.8 8.8 6.4 0.07 2.23 0.60 <0.001 112 115 0.2 2.4 1.6 0.02
Female
 Overall 33 28.1 25.0 0.7 22.9 25.1 0.7 1.29 1.26 0.9 118 118 0.7 3.9 4.7 0.4
 Job
  Cane cutter - - - - - - - - - - -
  Seeder 21 32.2 24.7 0.5 26.4 29.8 0.7 1.19 1.26 0.7 120 122 0.1 4.6 5.6 0.6
  Seed cutter 10 26.2 25.1 0.9 15.3 15.1 0.9 1.26 1.37 0.8 114 112 0.3 2.7 3.7 0.3
  Agrichemical applicator - - - - - - - - - - -
  Irrigator - - - - - - - - - - -
  Driver - - - - - - - - - - -
  Factory worker 2 9.3 28.4 0.6 38.1 51.4 0.6 3.32 0.80 0.05 116 113 0.2 4.2 2.4 0.7

Note: P is for comparison of pre- to late-harvest levels of each biomarker, using paired t-tests.

Abbreviations: NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; IL-18, interleukin 18; NAG, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio.

a

Geometric mean is presented; variable is log-normally distributed.

b

Mean is presented; variable is normally distributed.

The overall late-harvest mean eGFR was 112 mL/min/1.73 m2 in men and 118 mL/min/1.73 m2 in women (Table 2). At pre-harvest, one worker (0.4%) had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, compared to eight at late-harvest (2.8%). Urine ACR was generally low (Table 2); fewer than 5% of workers had levels greater than 30 mg/g at either time point (Table 1).

Job Category and Biomarkers of Kidney Injury

Field workers (cane cutters, seeders, seed cutters, agrichemical applicators, and irrigators) had a mean increase in NGAL concentration during the harvest that was 1.49 times as high as the change among non-field workers (drivers and factory workers) (relative mean [RM], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.09; Table 3, Model 1). Similarly, the change in IL-18 was 61% higher in field workers than in non-field workers (RM, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.12-2.31; Table 3, Model 1).

Table 3.

Linear mixed effects models for change in urinary biomarkers of kidney injury among sugarcane workers

All Workers (N=284)
Restricted to Men (n=251)
NGAL, ln(μg/g) IL-18, ln(ng/g) NAG, ln(U/g) NGAL, ln(μg/g) IL-18, ln(ng/g) NAG, ln(U/g)

Model 1 a
Job setting
  Field worker 1.49 (1.06-2.09) 1.61 (1.12, 2.31) 2.92 (2.08, 4.10) 1.73 (1.22, 2.44) 1.66 (1.14, 2.42) 2.88 (1.99, 4.16)
  Non-field worker ref ref ref ref ref ref
Sex
  Male 0.38 (0.27, 0.53) 0.38 (0.27, 0.51) 0.85 (0.59, 1.22) - - -
  Female ref ref ref - - -
Model 2 b
Job
  Cane cutter 2.57 (1.54, 4.27) 1.89 (1.08, 3.29) 4.92 (2.94, 8.23) 2.67 (1.62, 4.41) 1.93 (1.10, 3.37) 4.90 (2.86, 8.39)
  Seeder 1.00 (0.57, 1.76) 2.11 (1.14, 3.92) 4.38 (2.47, 7.77) 1.50 (0.69, 3.23) 3.44 (1.46, 8.08) 4.98 (2.19, 11.4)
  Seed cutter 0.79 (0.39, 1.58) 1.05 (0.49, 2.27) 2.57 (1.26, 5.23) 0.65 (0.25, 1.65) 0.82 (0.29, 2.33) 1.54 (0.56, 4.18)
  Agrichemical
applicator
1.00 (0.55, 1.84) 1.19 (0.61, 2.32) 3.23 (1.74, 5.97) 1.04 (0.57, 1.90) 1.22 (0.63, 2.37) 3.21 (1.69, 6.10)
  Irrigator 2.07 (1.24, 3.47) 1.50 (0.86, 2.63) 3.66 (2.18, 6.17) 2.16 (1.30, 3.58) 1.53 (0.87, 2.70) 3.65 (2.12, 6.29)
  Driver 1.09 (0.63, 1.88) 0.96 (0.53, 1.74) 2.03 (1.17, 3.52) 1.13 (0.66, 1.94) 0.98 (0.54, 1.79) 2.02 (1.14, 3.58)
  Factory worker ref ref ref ref ref ref
Sex
  Male 0.41 (0.26, 0.63) 0.34 (0.23, 0.51) 0.94 (0.58, 1.51) - - -
  Female ref ref ref - - -

Note: Values are given as relative mean (95% confidence interval); relative mean (exponentiated β coefficient; ie, e to the power of β) represents the fold-change in biomarker during the harvest compared to the reference group, as outcome variables were ln-transformed prior to analyses. For example, field workers had a mean change in NGAL concentration during the harvest that was 1.49 times as high as the change among non-field workers.

Abbreviations: NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; IL-18, interleukin 18; NAG, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase.

a

Model 1: individual job categories were grouped into field workers (cane cutters, seeders, seed cutters, agrichemical applicators, and irrigators) and non-field workers (drivers and factory workers). Model parameters for each ln(outcome) include time, fieldworker status, time × fieldworker status, sex, age, and years worked. Results presented as “Change in biomarker during harvest” are the exponentiated β coefficients of the time × fieldworker status variable. Full model results and p-values are presented in Table S3.

b

Model 2: all job categories were analyzed individually. Model parameters for each ln(outcome) include time, job, time×job, sex, age, and years worked. Results presented as “Change in biomarker during harvest” are the exponentiated β coefficients of the time×job variable. Full model results and p-values are presented in Table S4.

When analyzed by individual job category, the mean increase in NGAL during the harvest was more than twice as high in cane cutters (RM, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.54-4.27) and irrigators (RM, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.24-3.47) as the change in factory workers (Table 3, Model 2). Compared to factory workers, cane cutters (RM, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.08-3.29) and seeders (RM, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.14-3.92) had the largest increases in IL-18 during the harvest (Table 3, Model 2).

Among all jobs, factory workers had the highest NAG concentrations pre-harvest and the lowest NAG concentrations late-harvest (Table 2). Changes in NAG during the harvest, compared to factory workers, were significant for all other six jobs (Table 3, Model 2). However, these relative increases were driven by a decrease in NAG among factory workers; therefore, no jobs were associated with increases in NAG during the harvest.

Men had concentrations of NGAL and IL-18 that were roughly one-third those of women at both the pre- and late-harvest time points (Table 3). For both biomarkers, the change during the harvest was not different by sex; this interaction term was therefore excluded from final models. There were no differences in NAG by sex (Table 3). For all models, there was no association between age or years worked and the biomarker of interest.

Differences by job category were maintained in sensitivity analyses restricted to men (Table 3) and to field workers. Results remained similar in models further adjusting for eGFR and ACR.

Hydration and Biomarkers of Kidney Injury

There was no overall association between self-reported daily intake of water or electrolyte solution during the harvest and NGAL, IL-18, or NAG at the late-harvest time point, while controlling for the pre-harvest biomarker value (Table 4). However, when stratified by job, each electrolyte solution packet consumed by cane cutters during the workday was associated with a 23% decrease in mean NGAL (RM, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98) and a 16% decrease in mean NAG (RM, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-1.01) (Table S5). Similarly, seed cutters had a 31% decrease in mean IL-18 (RM, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46-1.04) and a 33% decrease in mean NAG (RM, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.44-1.02) with each additional electrolyte solution packet consumed (Table S5).

Table 4.

Multivariable analysis of late-harvest biomarkers of kidney injury by hydration among sugarcane workers

Variable NGAL [ln(μg/g)] IL-18 [ln(ng/g)] NAG [ln(U/g)]



Water consumption, per 1-L greater 0.99 (0.93-1.06) 1.02 (0.95-1.09) 1.02 (0.96-1.09)
Electrolyte solution consumption, per
1 packet morea
1.03 (0.94-1.12) 1.05 (0.96-1.14) 1.00 (0.92-1.07)

Note: Values are given as relative mean (95% confidence interval); relative mean (exponentiated β coefficient; ie, e to the power of β) represents the fold-change in biomarker per unit increase of consumption. Model parameters include water, electrolyte solution, job, sex, age, years worked, and pre-harvest biomarker value.

Abbreviations: NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; IL-18, interleukin 18; NAG, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase.

a

Each packet is 100mL.

Relationships Between Biomarkers of Kidney Injury and eGFR

To determine whether marked increases in urinary biomarkers were associated with decreased eGFR, the change in each kidney injury biomarker was categorized into tertiles. During the six month harvest, workers with the largest increases in NGAL and NAG (upper tertile compared to lower two tertiles) had declines in eGFR of 4.6 (95% CI, −8.2 to −1.0) mL/min/1.73 m2 and 3.1 (95% CI, −6.7 to 0.6) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, while controlling for age, sex, and years worked. This relationship was not observed for IL-18. When examined as continuous variables, changes in biomarkers during the harvest season were not correlated with changes in eGFR, with the exception of NAG, which had a weak negative correlation with change in eGFR (Table 5). Although increases in all biomarkers were associated with increases in albuminuria, the increases in albuminuria were small; during the harvest, ACR remained >30 mg/g (microalbuminuria) in four workers and increased to >30 mg/g in five workers.

Table 5.

Spearman correlations between biomarkers of kidney injury and function among sugarcane workers

NGAL or ΔNGAL
(μg/g)
IL-18 or ΔIL-18
(ng/g)
NAG or ΔNAG
(U/g)
r P r P r P
Pre-harvest
 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 0.02 0.8 0.14 0.02 −0.12 0.05
 ACR (mg/g) 0.29 <0.001 0.23 <0.001 0.20 <0.001
Change during harvest
 Δ eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) −0.11 0.08 0.01 0.8 −0.12 0.05
 Δ ACR (mg/g) 0.22 <0.001 0.21 <0.001 0.28 <0.001

Note: r represents the Spearman correlation coefficient, and P is its associated p-value.

Abbreviations: NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; IL-18, interleukin 18; NAG, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin-creatinine ratio.

DISCUSSION

In a population of Nicaraguan sugarcane workers at risk for Mesoamerican nephropathy, urinary NGAL and IL-18, both biomarkers of kidney injury, increased during the harvest season in certain job tasks relative to others. These findings suggest that subclinical kidney injury is occurring in these workers during one harvest season, and the differences by job provide evidence that occupational exposures play a role. We found associations between increases in NGAL and NAG and decreases in eGFR. Finally, we found evidence that consumption of electrolyte solution may reduce biomarkers of kidney injury among individuals working high-risk jobs.

Our results indicate that, of the seven jobs studied, cane cutters are at highest risk of kidney injury during the harvest. These workers had consistently greater increases in both NGAL and IL-18 during the harvest season, suggesting more substantial kidney injury than workers in other jobs, although irrigators and seeders showed some evidence of injury as well. Cane cutters have the most physically strenuous sugarcane job; furthermore, they are paid based on their daily work output, a compensation structure that may increase physical strain. Previous studies in Central America have determined that cane cutters are at risk for heat stress, documenting wet-bulb globe temperature indices that exceed internationally accepted heat exposure limits.29,32-35 Seeders also have a demanding job in hot ambient conditions, and are paid based on a similar structure.29 Our finding is in accordance with the hypothesis that heat stress might be playing a role, although other factors that differ by job could also have a part in the observed results (Table S1). Although agrichemicals have been suggested as an etiology of the CKD epidemic, compared to other field workers, agrichemical applicators did not have increases in kidney injury biomarkers. Despite this finding, the potential role of agrichemical exposure should be investigated further given the extensive use in the region.36,37

In combination with intense labor in high heat settings, repeated volume depletion may be an important contributor to kidney disease in the region.5,10,12,17,38 In this study, self-reported intake of water or electrolyte solution was generally not associated with biomarkers of kidney injury. However, when stratified by job, we observed that electrolyte solution had a protective effect among cane cutters and seed cutters. Consistent with these findings, we previously noted in these cane cutters that late-harvest eGFR was higher by a mean of 6.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 with each additional electrolyte solution packet consumed.13 These findings suggest that for the most high-risk jobs such as cane cutting, intake of electrolyte solutions for rehydration during the workday might protect against kidney injury.

In this population, we previously reported mean decreases in eGFR during the harvest that varied by job.13 Those results are consistent with findings from the present study and suggest that one or more risk factors for this kidney disease are occupational. Few of these workers had substantially decreased eGFR, however, highlighting the importance of examining kidney injury biomarkers. An evolving body of literature suggests that these markers may be useful as early indicators of AKI.19,20,22,25,39 Less is known about their ability to predict subclinical AKI or future CKD; repeated incidents of subclinical kidney damage may increase CKD risk, but this relationship remains unclear.40-42 The lack of overall correlation between changes in urinary biomarkers and changes in eGFR may reflect the possibility that changes in biomarkers precede changes in eGFR. However, workers with the greatest increases in NGAL and NAG during the harvest had greater declines in eGFR. Some biomarkers, particularly NGAL, may also be markers of disease severity and can predict CKD progression and mortality.18,23,39,43 It is possible that among these workers, repeated subclinical kidney damage over multiple harvests leads to clinically apparent disease and progressive CKD.

Few workers had albuminuria; this is consistent with findings from other studies in the region,6-10,12 but may be expected due to the relatively healthy nature of the study population. The presence of NGAL, IL-18, and NAG in the urine of these workers, however, provides evidence that the disease process may be primarily tubulointerstitial. While we cannot rule out systemic stress or inflammation as a cause of the elevated biomarkers,20,24,26 these individuals are overtly healthy and exposed to environmental conditions that are hypothesized to cause kidney injury and damage.44 Accordingly, it is most likely that the changes in these biomarkers are consistent with tubular injury. Kidney biopsy specimens from patients with CKD in El Salvador indicated glomerular lesions in addition to tubulointerstitial damage,45,46 which may suggest a primary tubulointerstitial disease with secondary glomerular manifestations.

Studies in Nicaragua suggest that men are 3-5 times more likely to be affected by Mesoamerican nephropathy compared with women.8,12,16 We found that at both pre- and late-harvest, men had NGAL and IL-18 concentrations that were roughly one-third those of women, regardless of normalization for urine creatinine, but that the change in these biomarkers during the harvest was not different by sex. In other populations, there are inconsistent findings regarding inherent differences by sex, though one study reports higher NGAL levels in healthy female children and adults than in males of the same age.47 A previous study of Nicaraguan adolescents also found that biomarker levels were higher in girls than boys.48 These findings require further investigation.

One limitation of this research is the lack of established kidney injury biomarker levels that represent subclinical damage. Furthermore, we do not know the short-term intra-individual variability of these biomarkers. We were able to evaluate concentrations within and between workers during the six-month harvest, but the magnitude of the increase is difficult to interpret and the clinical relevance is unknown. When comparing our population to pre-operative cardiac surgery patients who did not develop AKI, mean and median concentrations of NGAL were similar, but concentrations of IL-18 were lower in our population.49 There are limited comparable occupational cohorts that have measured these biomarkers in workers.50 To our knowledge, only one previous study in this region has measured kidney injury biomarkers; NGAL levels were increased in 26% of CKD cases in El Salvador.51 However, it is difficult to compare our population of healthy workers to a population of CKD cases.

There are several additional limitations to this study. First, we used job category as a surrogate exposure metric. Job category may represent one or more unidentified risk factors, possibly including occupational and/or non-occupational exposures. Future studies should directly measure exposure to putative causal agents. Second, biomarker levels could potentially be affected by storage of biological specimens. Though NGAL and IL-18 levels do not seem to be greatly affected by short-term handling variations,52 levels may decline over time in frozen samples. In one study, NAG was shown to decline 28-fold over one year while stored at −80°C,53 although this finding has not been confirmed. It is possible that this degradation issue influenced our null findings for NAG. Finally, the loss-to-follow-up in this study population is a potential issue and has been previously described in detail.13 Loss-to-follow-up during the harvest could be categorized into two types: (1) 99 workers were no longer working when the late-harvest sampling was done, and (2) 499 workers were actively working but did not undergo sampling at late-harvest (Figure S1). If the reason for leaving work was related to kidney injury, it is possible that biomarker levels would have been higher than what we observed, with more pronounced differences by job task, as many of these workers were in higher risk jobs. We had financial and logistical restrictions that necessitated our selecting a random sample of those workers still active, and this would not be expected to influence our results.

In conclusion, in this population of Nicaraguan sugarcane workers, we found that biomarkers of kidney injury varied by job and increased during the harvest season, most notably among cane cutters. These findings suggest that occupational heat stress and volume depletion may play a role in Mesoamerican nephropathy, and future studies that quantify these exposures are needed. Our results are consistent with tubular injury and support the hypothesis that in these workers, repeated subclinical kidney damage may lead to clinically apparent CKD over time. Our findings suggest that for high-risk jobs such as cane cutting, using electrolyte solutions for rehydration during the workday may protect against kidney injury; this should be evaluated with more quantitative measures of fluid balance in future studies.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3
4
5
6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr Alcides Gonzalez and the Nicaraguan Ministry of Health for contributions to the field investigation and laboratory support. We also thank the study participants.

Support: The funds were provided by the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman (CAO), the independent accountability mechanism for social and environmental issues of the International Finance Corporation (IFC)/Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) of the World Bank Group, and the Comité Nacional de Productores de Azúcar (CNPA). The CAO managed all funds and maintained the contract to conduct the research. Dr Parikh was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH; K24DK090203). Dr Ramírez-Rubio was funded by the Enrique Najera predoctoral grant awarded by the Spanish Society of Epidemiology and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Ms Laws was funded by a NIH training grant (T32 ES014562) and a Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Fellowship Assistance agreement (no. FP-91764901-0) awarded by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication. The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the authors.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

N section:

Because two authors of this article are editors for AJKD, the peer-review and decision-making processes were handled entirely by an Associate Editor (Morgan Grams, MD, PhD) who served as Acting Editor-in-Chief. Details of the journal’s procedures for potential editor conflicts are given in the Information for Authors & Journal Policies.

Financial Disclosure: Funding for future studies is being provided by the CNPA and Los Azucareros Del Istmo Centroamericano (AICA), and is being managed by the CDC Foundation. Donors have not reviewed or influenced the content of this paper. Dr Parikh is listed as a co-inventor on an IL-18 patent granted to the University of Colorado (no monetary value). The other authors declare that they have no other relevant financial interests.

Contributions: Research idea and study design: MDM, DRB, JJA, DEW, JSK, RLL, OR-R, AR; data acquisition: JJA, DL-P, JMS, OR-R; data analysis/interpretation: RLL, MDM, DRB, MKS, DEW, JSK, CRP; statistical analysis: RLL, MDM; supervision or mentorship: MDM, DRB, MKS. Each author contributed important intellectual content during manuscript drafting or revision and accepts accountability for the overall work by ensuring that questions pertaining to the accuracy or integrity of any portion of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. MDM takes responsibility that this study has been reported honestly, accurately, and transparently; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained.

Supplementary Material

Table S1: Description of sugarcane job categories and likelihood of exposure to putative causal agents.

Table S2: Non-normalized kidney injury biomarkers in sugarcane workers at pre- and late harvest, stratified by sex.

Table S3: Model output for linear mixed effects models evaluating change in kidney injury biomarkers by fieldworker status.

Table S4: Model output for linear mixed effects models evaluating change in kidney injury biomarkers by job.

Table S5: Multivariable analysis of late-harvest kidney injury biomarkers by hydration among sugarcane workers, stratified by job.

Figure S1: Derivation of study population.

Note: The supplementary material accompanying this article (doi:_______) is available at www.ajkd.org

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wesseling C, Crowe J, Hogstedt C, Jakobsson K, Lucas R, Wegman DH. Resolving the Enigma of the Mesoamerican Nephropathy: A Research Workshop Summary. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(3):396–404. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ramirez-Rubio O, Brooks DR, Amador JJ, Kaufman JS, Weiner DE, Scammell MK. Chronic kidney disease in Nicaragua: a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with physicians and pharmacists. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(350) doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ramirez-Rubio O, McClean MD, Amador JJ, Brooks DR. An epidemic of chronic kidney disease in Central America: an overview. Journal of epidemiology and community health. 2013;67(1):1–3. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weiner DE, McClean MD, Kaufman JS, Brooks DR. The Central American Epidemic of CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(3):504–11. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05050512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wesseling C, Crowe J, Hogstedt C, Jakobsson K, Lucas R, Wegman DH. The Epidemic of Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology in Mesoamerica: A Call for Interdisciplinary Research and Action. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(11):1927–30. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Orantes CM, Herrera R, Almaguer M, et al. Epidemiology of Chronic Kidney Disease in Adults of Salvadoran Agricultural Communities. MEDICC Review. 2014;16(2):23–30. doi: 10.37757/MR2014.V16.N2.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Raines N, González M, Wyatt C, et al. Risk Factors for Reduced Glomerular Filtration Rate in a Nicaraguan Community Affected by Mesoamerican Nephropathy. MEDICC Review. 2014;16(2):16–22. doi: 10.37757/MR2014.V16.N2.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.O’Donnell JK, Tobey M, Weiner DE, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for chronic kidney disease in rural Nicaragua. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(9):2798–805. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Orantes CM, Herrera R, Almaguer M, et al. Chronic Kidney Disease and Associated Risk Factors in the Bajo Lempa Region of El Salvador: Nefrolempa Study, 2009. MEDICC Review. 2011;13(4):14–22. doi: 10.37757/MR2011V13.N4.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peraza S, Wesseling C, Aragon A, et al. Decreased kidney function among agricultural workers in el salvador. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(4):531–40. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sanoff SL, Callejas L, Alonso CD, et al. Positive association of renal insufficiency with agriculture employment and unregulated alcohol consumption in Nicaragua. Ren Fail. 2010;32(7):766–77. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2010.494333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Torres C, Aragon A, Gonzalez M, et al. Decreased kidney function of unknown cause in Nicaragua: a community-based survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55(3):485–96. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Laws RL, Brooks DR, Amador JJ, et al. Changes in kidney function among Nicaraguan sugarcane workers. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2015 doi: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000102. published online ahead of print January 28, 2015. doi: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Global Burden of Disease: Disease and injury country estimates. World Health Organization; [Accessed Sept 2012]. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates_country/en/index.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Correa-Rotter R, Wesseling C, Johnson RJ. CKD of Unknown Origin in Central America: The Case for a Mesoamerican Nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(3):506–20. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.10.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cuadra SN, Jakobsson K, Hogstedt C, Wesseling C. Chronic kidney disease: assessment of current knowledge and feasibility for regional research collaboration in Central America. SALTRA, IRET-UNA; Heredia Costa Rica: [Accessed Sept 2014]. 2006. Work and Health Series, No. 2. Available at: http://www.saltra.una.ac.cr/index.php/sst-vol-2. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brooks DR, Ramirez-Rubio O, Amador JJ. CKD in Central America: A Hot Issue. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(4):481–4. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Devarajan P. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL): a new marker of kidney disease. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2008;241:89–94. doi: 10.1080/00365510802150158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vaidya VS, Ferguson MA, Bonventre JV. Biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:463–93. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bonventre JV, Vaidya VS, Schmouder R, Feig P, Dieterle F. Next-generation biomarkers for detecting kidney toxicity. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):436–40. doi: 10.1038/nbt0510-436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Coca SG, Yalavarthy R, Concato J, Parikh CR. Biomarkers for the diagnosis and risk stratification of acute kidney injury: a systematic review. Kidney Int. 2008;73(9):1008–16. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Charlton JR, Portilla D, Okusa MD. A basic science view of acute kidney injury biomarkers. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(7):1301–11. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bolignano D, Lacquaniti A, Coppolino G, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and progression of chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(2):337–44. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03530708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Obermuller N, Geiger H, Weipert C, Urbschat A. Current developments in early diagnosis of acute kidney injury. International urology and nephrology. 2014;46(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0448-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Parikh CR, Abraham E, Ancukiewicz M, Edelstein CL. Urine IL-18 Is an Early Diagnostic Marker for Acute Kidney Injury and Predicts Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3046–52. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005030236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Devarajan P. Biomarkers for the early detection of acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23(2):194–200. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328343f4dd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu Y, Guo W, Zhang J, et al. Urinary interleukin 18 for detection of acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;62(6):1058–67. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chawla LS, Eggers PW, Star RA, Kimmel PL. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease as interconnected syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(1):58–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1214243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McClean M, Laws R, Ramirez-Rubio O, Brooks D. Industrial hygiene/occupational health assessment: evaluating potential hazards associated with chemicals and work practices at the Ingenio San Antonio. Chichigalpa, Nicaragua: [Accessed June 2013]. 2010. Available at: http://www.cao-ombudsman.org/cases/document-links/documents/FINALIHReport-AUG302010-ENGLISH.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liangos O, Perianayagam MC, Vaidya VS, et al. Urinary N-acetyl-beta-(D)-glucosaminidase activity and kidney injury molecule-1 level are associated with adverse outcomes in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(3):904–12. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006030221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cortez OD. Heat stress assessment among workers in a Nicaraguan sugarcane farm. Global Health Action. 2009:2. doi: 10.3402/gha.v2i0.2069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Crowe J, Moya-Bonilla JM, Roman-Solano B, Robles-Ramirez A. Heat exposure in sugarcane workers in Costa Rica during the non-harvest season. Glob Health Action. 2010:3. doi: 10.3402/gha.v3i0.5619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Crowe J, Wesseling C, Solano BR, et al. Heat Exposure in Sugarcane Harvesters in Costa Rica. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2013;56(10):1157–64. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kjellstrom T, Crowe J. Climate change, workplace heat exposure, and occupational health and productivity in Central America. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2009;17(3):270–81. doi: 10.1179/107735211799041931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wesseling C, Crowe J, Hogstedt C, Jakobsson K, Lucas R, Wegman D, editors. Mesoamerican Nephropathy: Report from the First International Research Workshop on MeN. SALTRA/IRET-UNA; Heredia, Costa Rica: [Accessed Sept 2014]. 2013. Available at: http://www.saltra.una.ac.cr/index.php/sst-vol-10. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chavkin S. Countries target pesticides as suspected link to rare kidney disease. The Center for Public Integrity; [Accessed Sept 2014]. 2013. Available from: http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/09/20/13444/countries-target-pesticides-suspected-link-rare-kidney-disease. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Johnson RJ, Sanchez-Lozada LG. Chronic kidney disease: Mesoamerican nephropathy - new clues to the cause. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013;9(10):560–1. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2013.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Coca SG, Garg AX, Thiessen-Philbrook H, et al. Urinary biomarkers of AKI and mortality 3 years after cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(5):1063–71. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013070742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bedford M, Farmer C, Levin A, Ali T, Stevens P. Acute Kidney Injury and CKD: Chicken or Egg? Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(4):485–91. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Venkatachalam MA, Griffin KA, Lan R, Geng H, Saikumar P, Bidani AK. Acute kidney injury: a springboard for progression in chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;298(5):F1078–94. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00017.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang L, Humphreys BD, Bonventre JV. Pathophysiology of acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease: maladaptive repair. Contributions to nephrology. 2011;174:149–55. doi: 10.1159/000329385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Smith ER, Lee D, Cai MM, et al. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin may aid prediction of renal decline in patients with non-proteinuric Stages 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(6):1569–79. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Soderland P, Lovekar S, Weiner DE, Brooks DR, Kaufman JS. Chronic kidney disease associated with environmental toxins and exposures. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010;17(3):254–64. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2010.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wijkstrom J, Leiva R, Elinder CG, et al. Clinical and pathological characterization of Mesoamerican nephropathy: a new kidney disease in Central America. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;62(5):908–18. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lopez-Marin L, Chavez Y, Garcia XA, et al. Histopathology of Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology in Salvadoran Agricultural Communities. MEDICC Review. 2014;16(2):49–54. doi: 10.37757/MR2014.V16.N2.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pennemans V, Rigo JM, Faes C, Reynders C, Penders J, Swennen Q. Establishment of reference values for novel urinary biomarkers for renal damage in the healthy population: are age and gender an issue? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(9):1795–802. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ramirez-Rubio O, Brooks DR, Amador JJ, et al. [Accessed Oct 2014];Biomarkers of early kidney damage in Nicaraguan adolescents. 2012 Sep-Nov; 2011. Available at: http://www.cao-ombudsman.org/cases/document-links/documents/AdolescentReportJune252012.pdf.
  • 49.Parikh CR, Coca SG, Thiessen-Philbrook H, et al. Postoperative biomarkers predict acute kidney injury and poor outcomes after adult cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(9):1748–57. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010121302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lacquaniti A, Fenga C, Venuti VA, et al. Hydrocarbons and kidney damage: potential use of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and sister chromatide exchange. Am J Nephrol. 2012;35(3):271–8. doi: 10.1159/000336310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Herrera R, Orantes CM, Almaguer M, et al. Clinical Characteristics of CKD of Nontraditional Cuases in Salvadoran Farming Communities. MEDDIC Review. 2014;16(2):39–48. doi: 10.37757/MR2014.V16.N2.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Parikh CR, Butrymowicz I, Yu A, et al. Urine stability studies for novel biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63(4):567–72. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nauta FL, Bakker SJ, Heerspink HL, et al. Effect of Frozen Storage on Urinary Concentration of Kidney Damage Markers. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(4):586–9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3
4
5
6

RESOURCES