Skip to main content
RSNA Journals logoLink to RSNA Journals
. 2016 Jan 12;36(1):293–294. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150073

Malignancies with Low Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake at PET/CT: Pitfalls and Prognostic Importance: Resident and Fellow Education Feature

Robert R Flavell 1, David M Naeger 1, Carina Mari Aparici 1, Randall A Hawkins 1, Miguel H Pampaloni 1, Spencer C Behr 1,
PMCID: PMC4801421  PMID: 26761542

Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is commonly performed for staging and restaging of solid tumors. Although most solid tumors demonstrate high uptake of FDG, many others do not. Low FDG uptake may be due to various reasons, including tumors with low glucose metabolism or low cellularity, improper patient preparation, and small tumor size. The presence of low-level FDG uptake could be a source of scan misinterpretation in these low-cellularity or low-glucose-metabolizing tumors, including low-grade lung adenocarcinomas, renal cell cancers, and mucinous neoplasms. The ability to detect lesions at PET/computed tomography (CT) stems from many factors, including size of the lesion, ability of the tumor to concentrate FDG, proper patient preparation, background FDG uptake in surrounding tissues, and type of scanner used. Several examples of low-grade lung adenocarcinoma, renal cell cancer, and mucinous neoplasms are presented that have low FDG uptake. For example, Figure 1 depicts a renal cell cancer without associated FDG avidity above background activity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Renal cell cancer. Contrast material–enhanced PET/CT image in a 95-year-old man with a history of Merkel cell cancer of the scalp shows an incidental enhancing solid left renal mass likely reflecting renal cell carcinoma. Because of low-level FDG uptake and high uptake in the adjacent renal collecting system, the lesion is not qualitatively detectable above background at PET imaging. By placing a region of interest (yellow circle) over the lesion, a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 4.9 was calculated, although this likely represents an overestimation due to adjacent collecting system activity and partial volume effects.

In many neoplasms, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), lymphoma, and prostate cancer, there is strong evidence that increasing FDG avidity correlates with poor prognosis and poor response to treatment. In these cases, high FDG uptake likely correlates with dedifferentiation or transformation to a more aggressive form of cancer. For example, in HCC, high FDG uptake predicts poor response to radiation therapy, transarterial chemoembolization, and liver transplantation and is also associated with higher stage and the presence of metastatic disease. Similarly, lesions with high FDG uptake in a patient with a known low-grade lymphoma are suspicious for high-grade transformation (also called Richter transformation). Therefore, in lymphoma, prostate cancer, and HCC, it is important for radiologists to report the degree of FDG uptake.

In thyroid cancer and neuroendocrine tumors, other nuclear tracers are used to follow disease progression, including iodine 123 (123I), iodine 131 (131I), and indium 111 (111In) pentetreotide, because these tumors biochemically resemble their tissue of origin. When thyroid cancer or neuroendocrine tumors dedifferentiate, they typically lose the ability to bind these tracers. Furthermore, in a manner similar to prostate cancer, lymphoma, and HCC, these more aggressive cancer subtypes also demonstrate increased FDG uptake. Therefore, well-differentiated thyroid or neuroendocrine tumors typically demonstrate high 123I, 131I, or 111In pentetreotide uptake and low FDG uptake. Conversely, poorly differentiated tumors demonstrate low 123I, 131I, or 111In pentetreotide uptake and high FDG uptake. This property has been termed the flip-flop effect. In general, these tumors with low iodine and pentetreotide uptake have a poor prognosis and poor response to therapy. Figure 2 depicts a neuroendocrine tumor with high FDG avidity, which portends poor prognosis and poor response to treatment. Importantly, poor 123I or 131I uptake correlates with poor treatment response to 131I. In neuroendocrine and thyroid tumors, it is important to report the presence of iodine, pentetreotide, and FDG uptake.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Axial fusion FDG PET/CT image in a 28-year-old woman with a metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (yellow circle). A pelvic lymph node metastasis demonstrates high FDG uptake (SUVmax, 4.9), and a separately performed 111In pentetreotide study demonstrated little or no uptake in this region. These findings are consistent with dedifferentiated tumor. Neuroendocrine tumors can demonstrate the flip-flop phenomenon, in which FDG uptake is inversely correlated with 111In pentetreotide uptake. Increasing FDG uptake and decreasing 111In pentetreotide uptake correlate with dedifferentiation and poor prognosis.

The online presentation provides a review of tumors with low FDG avidity, tumors in which FDG avidity carries prognostic importance, and cancers that exhibit the flip-flop phenomenon, with numerous case examples for each category.

Supplementary Material

Download:

2016150073supp.pdf (814.4KB, pdf)

(1 Mb) |

2016150073supp.pptx (7.8MB, pptx)

(8 Mb)

Recipient of a Certificate of Merit award for an education exhibit at the 2014 RSNA Annual Meeting.

All authors have disclosed no relevant relationships.

Funding: The work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant 5T32EB001631-10).

R.R.F. supported by an RSNA Research Fellow Grant and a Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging–Educational Research Foundation Mitzi & William Blahd, MD, Pilot Research Grant.

Abbreviations:

FDG
fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose
HCC
hepatocellular carcinoma
SUV
standardized uptake value

Suggested Readings

  1. Bahri H, Laurence L, Edeline J, et al. High prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a long-term evaluation. J Nucl Med 2014;55(11):1786–1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger KL, Nicholson SA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA. FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: correlation of FDG uptake with histopathologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174(4):1005–1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kang DE, White RL, Jr, Zuger JH, Sasser HC, Teigland CM. Clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography for detection of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2004;171(5):1806–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Radiographics are provided here courtesy of Radiological Society of North America

RESOURCES