Skip to main content
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports logoLink to International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
. 2016 Mar 2;21:67–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.02.026

Primary omental gangrene mimicking appendicular perforation peritonitis—A case report

A Kumar 1,, J Shah 1, P Vaidya 1
PMCID: PMC4802291  PMID: 26945486

Highlights

  • Patient presented as a case of appendicular perofration with pyoperitoneum leading to localized peritonitis which is a common surgical emergency.

  • Primary omental torsion is a rare diagnosis and very difficult to diagnose at the emergency room.

  • We report a patient with omental torsion and further gangrene of the omentum leading to pyoperitoneum mimicking appendicuar perforation peritonitis.

  • A review of literature is also included.

Keywords: Primary omental torsion, Appendicular perforation, Case report

Abstract

Introduction

Primary omental torsion is a rare cause of acute abdomen in adults and presents with variable signs and symptoms. Establishing a preoperative diagnosis may be difficult in the emergency setting. It is rarely diagnosed preoperatively as it mimics common surgical emergencies such as acute appendicitis, appendicular perforation, acute cholecystitis and perforated peptic ulcers and can lead to the clinical deterioration of patient if missed

Presentation of case

A 47 years old male was taken to the operating room with a diagnosis of appendicular perforation peritonitis and during surgery was found to have a primary omental gangrene with pyoperitoneum, for which omentectomy and peritoneal lavage was performed.

Discussion

Torsion of the omentum is a condition in which the organ twists on its long axis to such an extent that its vascularity is compromised. Omental torsion can be primary (idiopathic) or secondary, depending on an underlying cause. Primary omental torsion was first described by Eitel in 1899. However, very few cases have been reported. Our case was a rare case presenting with omental gangrene with pyoperitoneum mimicking appendicular perforation peritonitis.

Conclusion

Primary omental torsion is a rare diagnosis. A high index of clinical suspicion is required for a preoperative diagnosis. In doubtful cases a CT scan may be helpful. Surgical excision of the omentum remains the treatment of choice; however, conservative management may be attempted in an uncomplicated omental torsion.

1. Introduction

Torsion of the omentum is a condition in which the organ twists on its long axis to such an extent that its vascularity is compromised [1], [2]. Omental torsion can be primary (idiopathic) or secondary, depending on an underlying cause. Primary omental torsion was first described by Eitel in 1899 [3]. However, very few cases have been reported in adults [4]. It is rarely diagnosed preoperatively and can lead to clinical deterioration of the patient if missed [5], [6]. Among a variety of conditions causing acute abdomen such as acute appendicitis, diverticulitis, ovarian cysts, acute cholecystitis and perforated peptic ulcers, acute omental torsion is least suspected [7].

2. Case report

A 47 years old male presented to our emergency room with a history of right lower abdominal pain since the last 12 days. The pain suddenly increased in severity and involved the lower abdomen for the 2 days prior to admission. The pain was constant and involved the lower abdomen. There was a history of fever with a maximum recorded temperature of 100 °F, but no nausea or vomiting. There was no significant medical or surgical history in the past. Abdominal examination revealed tenderness with rigidity in the lower abdomen. Biochemical analysis revealed leukocytosis of 16700/mm3. All other laboratory parameters were within normal limits. With a diagnosis of appendicular perforation peritonitis the patient was taken to the operating room. A midline laparotomy was performed and intraoperatively, 400 ml of pus was suctioned from the peritoneal cavity with 4 × 5 cm s of gangrenous omentum which was adhered to the anterior abdominal wall in the right lower abdomen with torsion along its axis. The appendix was normal. Gangrenous omentum was removed and extensive peritoneal lavage was performed. Appendectomy was not performed (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). The omentum was sent for histopathology. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was started on oral diet from the first post operative day. The patient was discharged on the third postoperative day.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Intraoperative finding of omental gangrene.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Omental torsion along axis with gangrene.

3. Discussion.

Omental torsion is a rare condition and difficult to diagnose preoperatively. It can mimic various other causes of acute abdomen. Omental torsion has an incidence of 0.0016–0.37% when compared with appendicitis (ratio of less than 4 cases per 1000 cases of appendicitis) [8], [9], [10]. The condition is predominantly seen in males who are middle aged, between the 3rd–5th decade of life [11], [12].

Omental torsion may be primary or secondary. In primary torsion, a mobile segment of omentum rotates around a proximal fixed point in the absence of any associated intra-abdominal pathology. Predisposing factors include, anatomical variations of the omentum itself, e.g., accessory omentum, bifid omentum, irregular accumulations of omental fat (in patients who are obese), narrowed omentum pedicle, and any redundancy of omental veins leading to kinking and twisting around the shorter and tenser arteries. Secondary torsion is more common and is associated with abdominal pathology like inguinal hernia (most common), tumors, cysts, internal or external herniation, foci of intra-abdominal inflammation and postsurgical wound or scarring [13], [14].

Omental torsion usually occurs in a clockwise direction where venous return is compromised and the distal omentum becomes congested and oedematous. Haemorragic extravasation leads to accumulation of serosanguinous fluid in the peritoneal cavity, then acute haemorragic infarction and finally omental necrosis due to arterial occlusion [13]. The right side of the omentum is longer, heavier and more mobile than the left side; this may be the reason for right-sided predominance of omental torsion. Left-sided torsion is extremely rare [15].

Clinically patients present with right lower abdomen pain, low grade fever with leukocytosis mimicking other common conditions such as acute appendicitis, diverticulitis, ovarian cysts, acute cholecystitis and perforated peptic ulcers [7]. This makes a preoperative diagnosis of primary omental torsion a challenge. Clinical examination reveals tenderness in the right lower abdomen which may be associated with a palpable mass or signs of peritonitis. The disease process is usually of a longer duration and the patient is relatively less unwell [16].

Ultrasonography shows focal area of increased echogenicity [17]. CT of the abdomen and pelvis shows whirling mass of fatty and fibrous tissue around a vascular pedicle, spiral fat pattern, a fatty mass with a whirling pattern, a circumscribed fatty mass with hyper-attenuated streaks and a concentric distribution of fibrous folds [17].

Management options available in the medical literature include an emergency laparotomy and also use of laparoscopy as an option for the benefits of minimally invasive surgery [18], [19]. Conservative management has been successfully attempted in many reported cases especially in patients with no complications [9], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24].

4. Conclusion

Primary omental torsion is a rare diagnosis. As it mimics several common causes of a surgical acute abdomen, a high index of clinical suspicion is required for a preoperative diagnosis. In doubtful cases a CT scan may be helpful. Surgical excision of the omentum remains the treatment of choice; however, conservative management may be attempted in an uncomplicated omental torsion.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Funding

No funding was obtained for the study.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institution Review Board.

Consent

Informed Written Consent was obtained by the patient for publishing.

Authors contribution

  • 1.

    Aditya Kumar: Study concept and design, data collection, analysis, writing, editing.

  • 2.

    Jayant Shah: Proof reading, editing.

  • 3.

    Pradeep Vaidya: Analysis, proof reading, editing, approval.

Guarantor

Aditya Kumar.

References

  • 1.Steyaert H., Valla J.-S. Laparoscopic approach to primary infarction of the greater omentum. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 1997;7(2):97–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kerem M., Bedirli A., Mentes B.B., Sakrak O., Pala I., Oguz M. Torsion of the greater omentum: preoperative computed tomographic diagnosis and therapeutic laparoscopy. JSLS. 2005;9(4):494–496. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eitel G.G. Rare omental torsion. NY Med. Rec. 1899;55:715. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Basson S.E., Jones P.A. Primary torsion of the omentum. Ann. R Coll. Surg. Engl. 1981;63:132–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saber A., LaRaja R., Meslemani A. Omental torsion. EMedicine. 2007:191817. article. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Parr N.J., Crosbie R.B. Intermittent omental torsion—an unusual cause of recurrent abdominal pain? Postgrad. Med. J. 1989;65:114–115. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.65.760.114. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liao S.Y. Acute torsion of greater omentum. Report of a case mimicking acute appendicitis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1989;44(5):331–335. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kimber C.P., Westmore P., Hutson J.M., Kelly J.H. Primary omental torsion in children. J. Paediatr. Child Health. 1996;32:22–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1996.tb01535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Itenberg E., Mariadason J., Khersonsky J., Wallack M. Modern management of omental torsion and omental infarction: a surgeon’s perspective. J. Surg. Educ. 2010;67:44–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pinedo-Onofre J.A., Guevara-Torres L. Omental torsion. An acute abdomen etiology. Gac. Med. Mex. 2007;143:17–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Loh M.H., Chui H.C., Yap T.L., Sundfor A., Tan C.E. Omental infarction—a mimicker of acute appendicitis in children. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2005;40:1224–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Karayiannakis A.J., Polychronidis A., Chatzigianni E., Simopoulos C. Primary torsion of greater omentum: report of case. Surg. Today. 2002;32:913–915. doi: 10.1007/s005950200180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kargar S., Fallahnejad R. Primary torsion of lesser sac omentum. Int. J. Surg. 2006;7(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Breunung N., Strauss P. A diagnostic challenge: primary omental torsion and literature review—a case report. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2009;4:4015. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-4-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hirano Y., Oyama K., Nozawa H., Hara T., Nakada K., Hada M. Left-sided omental torsion with inguinal hernia. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006;12(4):662–664. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i4.662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Al-Jaberi T., Gharaibeh K., Yaghan R. Torsion of abdominal appendages presenting with acute abdominal pain. Ann. Saudi Med. 2000;20(3–4):211–213. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2000.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tamamoto F., Ishizaki H., Takanashi T., Shimoji K., Okamura T., Yoshimura T. Omental torsion with right-sided inguinal hernia. Radiat. Med. 2005;23:566–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Danikas D., Theodoros S., Espinel J., Schneider C. Laparoscopic treatment of two patient with omental infarction mimicking acute appendicitis. JSLS. 2001;5(1):73–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hosseinpour M., Abdollahi A., Jazayeri H., Talari H.R., Sadeghpou A. Omental torsion after repeated abdominal blunt trauma. Arch. Trauma Res. 2012;1(2):75–78. doi: 10.5812/atr.6881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rimon A., Daneman A., Gerstle J.T., Ratnapalan S. Omental infarction in children. J. Pediatr. 2009;155:427–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.03.039. e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kavalakat A.J., Varghese C.J. Laparoscopic management of an uncommon cause for right lower quadrant pain: a case report. Cases J. 2008;1:164. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-1-164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miguel Perelló J., Aguayo Albasini J.L., Soria Aledo V., Aguilar Jiménez J., Flores Pastor B., Candel Arenas M.F., GirelaBaena E. Omental torsion: imaging techniques can prevent unnecessary surgical interventions. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2002;25:493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abadir J.S., Cohen A.J., Wilson S.E. Accurate diagnosis of infarction of omentum and appendices epiploicae by computed tomography. Am. Surg. 2004;70:854–857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Soobrah R., Badran M., Smith S.G. Conservative management of segmental infarction of the greater omentum: a case report and review of literature. Case Rep. Med. 2010;2010 doi: 10.1155/2010/765389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES