Abstract
Ventriculoatrial shunt (VA) is one of the oldest solutions for hydrocephalus. However over subsequent years various complication of VA shunt such as obstructions, malposition, shunt infections, cardiac complications such as endocarditis, traumatic perforation, heart failure, tricuspid regurgitation, intraatrial thrombus, and pulmonary hypertension are reported. Hence, VA shunt procedure has fallen into disrepute. Still VA shunt may be a good option in selected patients with hostile peritoneum. Newer placement strategies and monitoring methods have been put forward to reduce complication following VA shunt. In this case report, we share a rare case of endocarditis with tricuspid regurgitation following a migrated retained calcified shunt tube in the right ventricle of heart 30 years after of VA shunt that was successfully managed.
Keywords: Migrated, retained, shunt, ventriculoatrial
Introduction
Ventriculoatrial (VA) shunt is one of the oldest solutions for hydrocephalus. VA shunt approaches may cause potentially life-threatening complications such as pulmonary artery hypertension, cardiac failure and atrial fibrillation.[1] Ben-Ami et al.[2] reported gram-positive bacteremia and shunt nephritis in a woman who had a VA shunt for 10 years.
Newer placement strategies have been put forward to reduce complication following VA shunt. Chuang et al.[3] reported the use of percutaneous placement with real-time transesophageal echocardiogram monitoring. Endovascular placement was put forward by Gonzalez et al.[4] In this case report, we share a rare case of endocarditis with tricuspid regurgitation following a migrated retained calcified shunt tube in the right ventricle of heart 30 years after of VA shunt that was successfully managed.
Case Report
This is the story of a 41-year-old man. The story starts when the patient was 12 years old (way back in 1983) when he developed hydrocephalus as a sequalae of tuberculous meningitis. He was treated with anti-tuberculous therapy and right VA shunt which was popular at that time. He improved and was discharged.
In 1990, he developed VA shunt dysfunction. Computed tomography (CT) showed hydrocephalus. He was treated with left sided ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Rt VA shunt was left in situ. He improved and discharged.
He was asymptomatic until 2010, then he developed diplopia, ataxia, clubbing and CSF leak through neck wound. Examination revealed a fistulous track posterior to sternomastoid with CSF leaking on the right side. CT scan showed hydrocephalus [Figure 1].
Figure 1.
Computerized tomogram showing hydrocephalus following shunt dysfunction in 2010
Exploration on right side showed obstruction due to block distal to shunt chamber. The distal end of the proximal ventricular catheter was disconnected from the shunt chamber and connected externally to a sterile reservoir to serve as an external ventricular drainage, as we suspected shunt infection. Fistula healed promptly. Exploration was done on the right side to remove the ventricular catheter and revise the shunt. However, we found it was adherent to brain matter, and so the intracranial part was retained in situ. Distal end was not addressed due to its right atrial location, and distal end was tethered to the jugular vein. A left VP shunt revision was done. CT scan showed a reduction of ventricular size to normal following revision of left sided VP shunt.
On the postoperative day seven, he developed a high fever that lasted for 2 weeks, with an erythematous rash. Blood picture showed leukocytosis and elevated ESR. Ultrasound of the abdomen showed splenomegaly. CSF culture was sterile. Blood culture revealed enterococci sensitive to Vancomycin. An echocardiogram was done which showed multiple vegetations with shunt tube in right ventricle with tricuspid regurgitation [Figure 2a–c]. Thus, we planned for removal of the distal end of VA shunt through the neck. The incision was made parallel to sternomastoid [Figure 3]. Shunt tube was seen entering through the facial vein going into the internal jugular vein. We tried to remove the shunt tube but were found stuck. Fever persisted. Thus, we planned for sternotomy and removal of shunt after cardiothoracic consultation.
Figure 2.
Echocardiogram (a) white arrow showing shunt tube in right atrium (b) shunt tube coursing from right atrium to right ventricle (c) white arrow showing vegetation adjacent to calcified shunt tube
Figure 3.
Schematic picture showing position of distal shunt tube
He was taken up for median sternotomy, right atriotomy, and retrieval of the shunt tube under cardiopulmonary bypass.
Intraoperative findings
The right atrium was opened. The entire length of the tube was seen calcified. Shunt tube was seen coiled around the tricuspid valve. The distal tip was seen going through the tricuspid valve and lying in proximity to pulmonary valve [Figure 4]. Tube was removed with difficulty. Shunt tip was sent for culture and sensitivity. Culture revealed enterococci sensitive to vancomycin. Thus, injection vancomycin was started and continued for 28 days. The patient improved clinically. There were no temperature fluctuations. Blood counts normalized. Repeat blood cultures were negative. An echocardiogram was done 6 weeks postoperatively which showed healed vegetations [Figure 5].
Figure 4.
Intraoperative picture showing vegetation on thick tricuspid valve after removal of calcified shunt tube. White arrow showing thickened tricuspid valve
Figure 5.
Echocardiogram showing healed vegetation
CT scan was repeated following the procedure, which showed complete resolution of hydrocephalus [Figure 6].
Figure 6.
Computerized tomogram done on follow-up showing resolution of hydrocephalus
Discussion
VA shunts were used to drain cerebrospinal fluid from cerebral ventricles to the right atrium of the heart. After the introduction of Spitz-Holter valve in 1952, VA shunting became a treatment choice for hydrocephalus, especially in premature infants with necrotizing enterocolitis.[5] However, over subsequent years various complication of VA shunt were recognized. The concept of VP shunt came forward in late sixties with less long-term complications compared with VA shunts.[6,7] Thus, VA shunts became an outdated procedure following the introduction of VP shunt.
VA shunt may be undertaken in selected patients with hostile peritoneum. However, complications like obstruction, bacteremia, cardiac failure, pulmonary hypertension must be borne in mind.[8] Numerous life-threatening cardiac complications such as pulmonary artery hypertension, cardiac failure, and atrial fibrillation following VA shunt placement.[1,9,10,11] Natarajan and Mazhar[11] reported a case of a 57-year-old male patient who presented with new onset atrial fibrillation following VA shunt. They demonstrated catheter-related right heart complications like calcific tricuspid stenosis and dilated right atrium.[11] Chaw et al. reported infective endocarditis in one VA shunt case.[12]
The procedure of VA shunt involves placement of the distal end of shunt tube in right atrium through IJV or its major tributaries. Proper placement is identified by tip position at D6-D7 interspace with x ray. Placement of catheter is demonstrated in Figure 3. Recent advances in interventional neuroradiology and endovascular techniques had reduced the complication rates following VA shunt.[3,4] Metellus et al.[13] also reported that percutaneous placement of VA shunt with radiographic guidance improves the effectivity and safety of the technique.
Conclusion
Even though there is a paucity of literature regarding VA shunt procedures, long-term complication is well documented. Even though, newer placement strategies and monitoring methods have been put forward to reduce complication VA shunt, the procedure has fallen into disrepute. VA shunt may be a good option in selected patients with hostile peritoneum. In this case report, we share a rare case of endocarditis with tricuspid regurgitation following a migrated retained calcified shunt tube in the right ventricle of heart 30 years after of VA shunt that was successfully managed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgment
I especially thank Cardiology Department and Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Medical College, Trivandrum for providing support and help in preparing manuscript.
References
- 1.Emery JL, Hilton HB. Lung and heart complications of the treatment of hydrocephalus by ventriculoauriculostomy. Surgery. 1961;50:309–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ben-Ami R, Navon-Venezia S, Schwartz D, Carmeli Y. Infection of a ventriculoatrial shunt with phenotypically variable Staphylococcus epidermidis masquerading as polymicrobial bacteremia due to various coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Kocuria varians. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2444–7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2444-2447.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chuang HL, Chang CN, Hsu JC. Minimally invasive procedure for ventriculoatrial shunt-combining a percutaneous approach with real-time transesophageal echocardiogram monitoring: Report of six cases. Chang Gung Med J. 2002;25:62–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gonzalez LF, Kim L, Rekate HL, McDougall CG, Albuquerque FC. Endovascular placement of a ventriculoatrial shunt. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(4 Suppl):319–21. doi: 10.3171/ped.2007.106.4.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nulsen FE, Spitz EB. Treatment of hydrocephalus by direct shunt from ventricle to jugular vain. Surg Forum. 1951;2:399–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vernet O, Rilliet B. Late complications of ventriculoatrial or ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Lancet. 2001;358:1569–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06670-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Drake JM, Kestle JR, Milner R, Cinalli G, Boop F, Piatt J, Jr, et al. Randomized trial of cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:294–303. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199808000-00068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Engelman RM, Ransohoff J, Cortes LE, Spencer FC. Complications of ventriculoatrial shunting for hydrocephalus requiring cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1969;8:464–9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)66077-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yavuz C, Demirtas S, Caliskan A, Kamasak K, Karahan O, Guclu O, et al. Reasons, procedures, and outcomes in ventriculoatrial shunts: A single-center experience. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:10. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.106284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Elhammady MS, Benglis DM, Bhatia S, Sandberg DI, Ragheb J. Ventriculoatrial shunt catheter displacement in a child with partial anomalous pulmonary venous return: Case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;2:68–70. doi: 10.3171/PED/2008/2/7/068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Natarajan A, Mazhar S. Right heart complications of ventriculoatrial shunt. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2134. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chaw HY, Buxton N, Wong PS. Staphylococcal endocarditis with a ventriculo-atrial shunt. J R Soc Med. 2004;97:182–3. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.97.4.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Metellus P, Hsu W, Kharkar S, Kapoor S, Scott W, Rigamonti D. Accuracy of percutaneous placement of a ventriculoatrial shunt under ultrasonography guidance: A retrospective study at a single institution. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:867–70. doi: 10.3171/2008.10.17674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]