After publication of this work [1], the authors noticed that Figs. 1 and 4 are duplicated. The original version of this article was corrected. The publisher apologizes for any inconvenience caused.
Fig. 1.
Inverted light microscopic images showing (a) dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells at primary culture, Magnification 5×. b Colony forming unit Fibroblast (CFU-F) magnification 5×, Alkaline phosphatase staining for DPSCs 14 days after osteoinduction (c) versus negative control (d), magnification 10×, and Oil red O staining for DPSCs 14 days after adipogenic induction (e) versus negative control (f), magnification 40×. (g) FACS analysis results of a representative dental pulp cell line
The correct Fig. 1 is given below:
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12903-015-0113-8.
References
- 1.Ajlan SA, Ashri NY, Aldahmash AM, Alnbaheen MS. Osteogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells under the influence of three different materials. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15:132. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0113-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]