Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1963 Jan;16(1):32–38. doi: 10.1136/jcp.16.1.32

Simplified quantitative methods for bacteriuria and pyuria

James McGeachie 1, Arthur C Kennedy 1
PMCID: PMC480481  PMID: 16810993

Abstract

Although pyelonephritis is a common disease, it escapes clinical detection in an undesirably high proportion of patients. The present unsatisfactory diagnostic position would be much improved by widespread screening of patients by simple yet reasonably accurate methods. Bacterial counts by the pour-plate technique and estimates of the white cell excretion per hour or day, while undoubtedly of diagnostic value, are probably unsuitable for use on a wide scale. In an attempt to find more convenient procedures a simplified stroke-plate method of bacterial counting and a simplified quantitative white cell count method were devised and applied to over 1,000 mid-stream urine samples from 398 patients. Good correlation was obtained between the simpler stroke-plate method of bacterial counting and the more time-consuming pour-plate method. The quantitative white cell procedure was a much more sensitive index of pyuria than wet-film microscopy, and comparison with the bacterial count results showed that it gave a useful indication of urinary infection. It is suggested that a quantitative bacterial count should replace non-quantitative culture methods when urinary infection is suspected and that the quantitative white cell count should be performed as a routine part of the initial clinical and laboratory assessment of all patients, followed by a bacterial count if pyuria is revealed. Experience has shown that routine urine microscopy by a precise method leads to the detection of many cases of occult urinary infection.

Full text

PDF
32

Images in this article

34Image
on p.34
34Image
on p.34

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BEESON P. B. The case against the catheter. Am J Med. 1958 Jan;24(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(58)90356-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BROD J. Chronic pyelonephritis. Lancet. 1956 Jun 23;270(6930):973–981. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(56)91798-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BRUMFITT W., DAVIES B. I., ROSSER E. I. Urethral catherter as a cause of urinary-tract infection in pregnancy and puerperium. Lancet. 1961 Nov 11;2(7211):1059–1062. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(61)92539-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CLARKE S. H. Investigation into methods of collection of urine for culture from men and women. Br Med J. 1960 Nov 19;2(5211):1491–1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5211.1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CLARKE S. H. Investigation into methods of collection of urine for culture from men and women. Br Med J. 1960 Nov 19;2(5211):1491–1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5211.1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HOEPRICH P. D. Culture of the urine. J Lab Clin Med. 1960 Dec;56:899–907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HOUGHTON B. J., PEARS M. A. Cell excretion in normal urine. Br Med J. 1957 Mar 16;1(5019):622–625. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5019.622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. JACKSON G. G., GRIEBLE H. G., KNUDSEN K. B. Urinary findings diagnostic of pyelonephritis. J Am Med Assoc. 1958 Jan 4;166(1):14–17. doi: 10.1001/jama.1958.02990010016004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. JACKSON G. G., GRIEBLE H. G. Pathogenesis of renal infection. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1957 Nov;100(5):692–700. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1957.00260110008002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. JACKSON G. G., POIRIER K. P., GRIEBLE H. G. Concepts of pyelonephritis; experience with renal biopsies and long-term clinical observations. Ann Intern Med. 1957 Dec;47(6):1165–1183. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-47-6-1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KAITZ A. L., WILLIAMS E. J. Bacteriuria and urinary-tract infections in hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 1960 Mar 3;262:425–430. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196003032620901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KASS E. H. Chemotherapeutic and antibiotic drugs in the management of infections of the urinary tract. Am J Med. 1955 May;18(5):764–781. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(55)90190-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KLEEMAN C. R., HEWITT W. L., GUZE L. B. Pyelonephritis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1960 Feb;39:3–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MACDONALD R. A., LEVITIN H., MALLORY G. K., KASS E. H. Relation between pyelonephritis and bacterial counts in the urine. N Engl J Med. 1957 May 16;256(20):915–922. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195705162562001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MONZON O. T., ORY E. M., DOBSON H. L., CARTER E., YOW E. M. A comparison of bacterial counts of the urine obtained by needle aspiration of the bladder, catheterization and midstream-voided methods. N Engl J Med. 1958 Oct 16;259(16):764–767. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195810162591603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. O'SULLIVAN D. J., FITZGERALD M. G., MEYNELL M. J., MALINS J. M. A simplified method for the quantitative bacterial culture of urine. J Clin Pathol. 1960 Nov;13:527–528. doi: 10.1136/jcp.13.6.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PRYLES C. V., STEG N. L. Specimens of urine obtained from young girls by catheter versus voiding; a comparative study of bacterial cultures, gram stains and bacterial counts in paired specimens. Pediatrics. 1959 Mar;23(3):441–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. RENGARTS R. Asymptomatic bacilluria in sixty-eight diabetic patients. Am J Med Sci. 1960 Feb;239:159–164. doi: 10.1097/00000441-196002000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. RHOADS P. S., BILLINGS C. E., O'CONOR V. J. Antibacterial management of urinary tract infections. J Am Med Assoc. 1952 Jan 19;148(3):165–170. doi: 10.1001/jama.1952.02930030001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. RILEY H. D., Jr Evaluation of a method for detecting and following urinary tract infection in females without catheterization. J Lab Clin Med. 1958 Dec;52(6):840–848. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES