Skip to main content
Acta Cardiologica Sinica logoLink to Acta Cardiologica Sinica
. 2014 Jul;30(4):274–283.

Gender and Age Differences in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Su-Kiat Chua 1,2,3, Kou-Gi Shyu 1,3, Huei-Fong Hung 3, Jun-Jack Cheng 3,4, Huey-Ming Lo 3,4, Shih-Chi Liu 3, Lung-Ching Chen 3, Chiung-Zuan Chiu 3,4, Che-Ming Chang 3, Shen-Chang Lin 3, Jer-Young Liou 3, Shih-Huang Lee 3,4
PMCID: PMC4804989  PMID: 27122800

Abstract

Background

Studies have reported that women with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have worse short- and long-term outcomes than men. It has not yet been confirmed whether these differences reflect differences in age between men and women.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 1035 consecutive STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Baseline clinical characteristics, coronary anatomy, and outcome were compared between young (< 65 years old) and older patients (≥ 65 years old) of both sexes.

Results

Younger women presented with a lower incidence of typical angina (83% vs. 93%, p = 0.03), single-vessel disease (21% vs. 35%, p = 0.03), and total occlusion of infarct-related artery (65% vs. 83%, p = 0.001) than younger men, with no gender difference noted in the older group. Younger women in the study had a higher incidence of reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission, or mortality (23% vs. 6%, p < 0.001) during follow-up, compared with younger men, with no gender difference in the older group. Using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, younger women had lower rates of event-free survival (p < 0.001 by log-rank test) than younger men, with no gender difference in the older group. In multivariate analysis, age could predict long-term outcome in men (Hazard ratio 4.43, 95% confidence interval: 2.89-6.78, p < 0.001) but not in women.

Conclusions

In STEMI patients receiving primary PCI, sex-related long-term outcome differences were age-dependent, with younger women likely to have a worse long-term outcome when compared with younger men.

Keywords: Coronary heart disease, Gender, Myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among both women and men in substantial areas of the world, but there are several clinically important differences between how MI impacts the two sexes. Although the incidence of acute MI increases with age, women are less prone to developing acute MI than men at any given age, with a lag of approximately 10 years between the sexes.1-5 Compared with men, women with acute MI have higher incidences of associated diabetes, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and metabolic syndrome, and a higher mortality rate after acute MI.2,6-15 Some studies have suggested a link to less aggressive hospital care of female patients, including the possible underuse of revascularization, as an explanation for their increased mortality.16 Other studies have indicated that age and comorbidity are the primary factors leading to mortality differences.17 Recent clinical trials of patients with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) showed no significant mortality variation in women compared with men, across all age ranges.18-20 A selection bias due to differential enrollment by gender and the low levels of younger patients in clinical trials might explain the failure of these studies to demonstrate excess mortality among younger women. Currently, it is unknown whether mortality among younger women gives rise to the excess mortality rates found in female patients with STEMI.

Because men and women differ in clinical presentation and prognostic factors, examining the relationship between sex and mortality according to patient age should shed light into the potential reasons for sex-related differences in short- and long-term outcomes after STEMI. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between sex and age on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with STEMI receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Patients

This retrospective study was approved by the local ethics committee; the informed consent requirement was waived because of the study’s retrospective design. To facilitate comparisons between men and women while striving to retain sufficient statistical power in each age group, we arbitrarily selected a cutoff point of 65 years to differentiate between younger and older patients. We analyzed the patients’ age- and sex-specific clinical characteristics, reperfusion therapy, angiographic findings, and short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Definitions

STEMI was defined by the following criteria: (1) a typical chest pain lasting at least 20 minutes; (2) elevated serum cardiac biomarkers at least twice the upper limit of normal; (3) ST segment elevation of 1 mm or more with subsequent evolution of negative T-waves with a depth of 1 mm or more, development of new Q-waves of ≥ 0.04 seconds in duration, or deeper than one fourth of the following R wave in voltage.21 All the patients had complete occlusion or critical stenosis of infarct-related arteries confirmed by coronary angiography. Current smoking was defined as smoking up to 1 month before admission. Hyperlipidemia was defined as a previous diagnosis by a physician, receiving lipid-lowering therapy, or either total cholesterol over 200 mg/dl or serum triglycerides over 150 mg/dl. Hypertension was defined as a previous diagnosis by a physician, receiving anti-hypertensive therapy, or known blood pressure values of ≥ 140 mmHg systolic or ≥ 90 mmHg diastolic on 2 or more occasions. Diabetes was defined as previous diagnosis by a physician. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 ml·min-1 1.73 m-2, and eGFR was measured using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study group equation developed in 1999.22 For evaluation of the peak serum cardiac biomarker activity, blood samples were obtained every 6 hours for 48 hours or until the activity returned to normal. The reference values for creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB were 26-192 IU/L and 7-25 IU/L, respectively. Blood samples for the lipid profile were drawn after an 8-hour fast during the index hospitalization.

Coronary angiography

After providing written informed consent, all patients received coronary artery angiography. Judgment of vessel flow was based on the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade. Angiographic stenosis was defined as a diameter reduction of ≥ 50%. Critical stenosis was defined as ≥ 70% narrowing of the coronary artery luminal diameter. Complete coronary occlusion was defined as the total absence of anterograde flow of contrast media or TIMI flow grade 0 in the infarct-related coronary artery. The infarct-related lesion was identified based on morphology including complete occlusion, thrombus, and ulcerative stenosis, or assumed to be the tightest stenosis if these features were absent.

Endpoints

The following clinical outcomes were analyzed: length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality and morbidity, repeated PCI, reinfarction, and mortality during follow-up. Repeated PCI was defined as unstable angina that required repeated revascularization during follow-up. Clinical follow-up variables, including repeated PCI, reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission, and mortality were obtained at clinic visits, and by telephone conversation and chart review. For those patients without follow-up in our outpatient department, we followed the patients by telephone conversation by our research assistant.

Statistics

All analyses were performed using PASW software, version 18.0, and quantitative data are expressed as mean ± SD. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the non-normal data. If the expected value of any cell was < 5, then a Fisher’s exact test was used. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A multivariable analysis with a Cox regression model was conducted separately for the 2 age groups, to identify the baseline variables independently associated with in-hospital morbidity and mortality. The selection of variables was restricted to variables that were identified a priori as relevant on the basis of clinical experience and variables with a p value less than .05 in the univariate model. The variables that were independently associated with in-hospital morbidity and mortality are presented as odds ratios followed by 95% confidence interval (CI). A significant hazard ratio was obtained if the 95% CI did not contain 1, and the p value was less than 0.05. The event-free (defined as free of reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission, or mortality) survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The significance of the difference between the curves was assessed by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Between April 1992 and December 2008, 1035 patients were admitted for STEMI and primary PCI in this institution. Of these 1035 patients, 850 patients (82%) were male, and 185 (18%) were female.

During this period, the mean age in men declined from 63.5 years in 1992 to 56.6 years in 2008 (slope -0.42), and in women it declined from 74.0 years in 1992 to 66.8 years in 2008 (slope -0.32) (Figure 1). The mean age of women was consistently older than men. Overall, the mean age was 60 ± 7.6 years, (range 26 to 98 years old), and women were older than men (69 ± 12 vs. 59 ± 12 years, p < 0.001).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Trends in mean age of study patients by gender, year 1992-2008.

Of the 1035 study patients, 618 patients were < 65 years old, including 57 (9%) women and 561 (91%) men, and 417 were ≥ 65 years old, including 128 (31%) women and 289 (69%) men.

Coronary risk factors and prior disease

Among the younger men, 67% were smokers, compared with 16% (p < 0.001) among the younger women, and 55% and 10% (p < 0.001), respectively, among the older men and women (Table 1). Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were more common in women than men, irrespective of age. Women and men had similar BMI, prevalence of CKD, heart failure, and previous coronary artery disease, and history of cerebral vascular accident, also irrespective of age.

Table 1. Comparison of patient characteristics and clinical presentation between women and men according to age.

< 65 years ≥ 65 years
Age groups Women (n = 57) Men (n = 561) p value Women (n = 128) Men (n = 289) p value
Age 55 ± 8 52 ± 8 0.008 76 ± 8 73 ± 6 < 0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2) 27 ± 4 26 ± 3 0.35 25 ± 4 24 ± 3 0.58
Smoking 9 (16) 375 (67) < 0.001 13 (10) 159 (55) < 0.001
Diabetes mellitus 35 (61) 141 (25) < 0.001 61 (48) 88 (30) 0.001
Hypertension 35 (61) 260 (46) 0.007 82 (64) 149 (52) 0.01
Hyperlipidemia 22 (39) 141 (25) 0.03 30 (23) 37 (13) 0.006
Chronic kidney disease 12 (21) 107 (19) 0.72 43 (33) 98 (34) 0.95
Heart failure 0 (0) 10 (2) 0.31 10 (8) 10 (4) 0.06
Previous coronary artery disease 4 (7) 30 (5) 0.6 14 (11) 27 (9) 0.62
History of cerebral vascular accident 3 (5) 16 (3) 0.32 10 (8) 31 (11) 0.36
Presentation at emergency department
Typical angina 47 (83) 519 (93) 0.03 105 (82) 249 (86) 0.28
Killip class ≥ III 20 (35) 131 (23) 0.09 49 (38) 105 (36) 0.7
Laboratory analysis
Anemia (hemoglobin < 10 mg/dl) 5 (9) 9 (2) 0.001 19 (15) 14 (5) 0.001
CK (IU/L) 2398 ± 1974 3286 ± 2778 0.02 2066 ± 2037 2824 ± 2732 0.005
CK-MB (IU/L) 211 ± 180 277 ± 254 0.06 197 ± 158 266 ± 284 0.01
Cholesterol (mg/dl) 201 ± 51 190 ± 42 0.08 189 ± 52 171 ± 38 < 0.001
Triglyceride (mg/dl) 226 ± 203 159 ± 147 0.003 130 ± 89 111 ± 93 0.07
High-density lipoprotein (mg/dl) 44 ± 14 41 ± 13 0.17 48 ± 18 43 ± 13 0.03
Low-density lipoprotein (mg/dl) 124 ± 42 121 ± 38 0.77 121 ± 45 109 ± 33 0.02
Door to balloon time, min 91.4 ± 14.9 93.3 ± 34.9 0.9 85.4 ± 32.4 96.4 ± 36.1 0.05
LVEF, by heart echo 55 ± 5 57 ± 13 0.69 42 ± 26 41 ± 25 0.8

Values are presented as number (%) and mean ± SD.

CK, creatine kinase; CK-MD, creatine kinase-MB; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

Clinical presentation

Younger women were significantly less likely to present with typical angina on admission (83% vs. 93%, p = 0.03) than younger men (Table 1). There was no difference with respect to Killip classification, initial vital signs on arrival, door-to-balloon time and left ventricular ejection fraction among men and women, irrespective of age. More women presented with anemia compared with men, irrespective of age (9% vs. 2%, p = 0.02 in the younger group; 15% vs. 5%, p = 0.001 in the older group). Younger women had lower levels of CK activity (2398 ± 1974 IU/L vs. 3286 ± 2778 IU/L, p = 0.02) and triglyceride (159 ± 147 mg/dl vs. 226 ± 203 mg/dl, p = 0.003) than younger men. Older women had lower levels of CK activity (2066 ± 2037 IU/L vs. 2824 ± 2732 IU/L, p = 0.005) and C K-MB activity (266 ± 284 IU/L vs. 197 ± 158 IU/L, p = 0.01), and higher level of cholesterol (189 ± 52 mg/dl vs. 171 ± 38 mg/dl, p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein (48 ± 18 mg/dl vs. 43 ± 13 mg/dl, p = 0.03), and low-density lipoprotein (121 ± 45 mg/dl vs. 109 ± 33 mg/dl, p = 0.02) than older men.

Coronary angiographic data and interventional therapy

Younger women had a higher prevalence of multi-vessel disease (79% vs. 65%, p = 0.03; Table 2) compared with younger men. Analysis of coronary angiogram data also showed that the left anterior descending artery was the most commonly involved infarct-related artery, followed by the right coronary artery and left circumflex artery in both men and women, irrespective of age. Younger women were less likely to have total occlusion of infarct-related artery than younger men (65% vs. 83%, p = 0.001). In both age groups, women had smaller stent diameter than men (3.0 ± 0.5 mm vs. 3.2 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.001 in the younger group; 2.9 ± 0.3 mm vs. 3.1 ± 0.5 mm, p < 0.001 in the older group). In addition, women had similar stent number, stent length, post-PCI TIMI flow grade, and incidence of successful primary PCI, irrespective of age.

Table 2. Comparison of coronary angiographic features between women and men according to age.

< 65 years ≥ 65 years
Age group Women (n = 57) Men (n = 561) p value Women (n = 128) Men (n = 289) p value
Number of diseased vessels 0.03 0.28
Single-vessel disease 12 (21) 197 (35) 29 (23) 80 (28)
Multiple-vessel disease 45 (79) 364 (65) 99 (77) 209 (72)
Infarct-related artery 0.85 0.64
Left main artery 0 (0) 5 (1) 2 (2) 12 (4)
Left anterior descending artery 33 (58) 292 (52) 66 (52) 153 (53)
Left circumflex artery 5 (9) 48 (9) 12 (9) 25 (9)
Right coronary artery 19 (33) 214 (38) 47 (37) 98 (34)
Intermediate artery 0 (0) 2 (0.4) 0 (0) 1 (1)
Total occlusion of infarct-related artery 37 (65) 463 (83) 0.001 99 (77) 217 (75) 0.66
Number of stents 0.8 ± 0.5 0.8 ± 0.5 0.61 0.61 ± 0.64 0.76 ± 0.61 0.1
Stent length (mm) 20 ± 5 22 ± 7 0.17 21 ± 9 21 ± 8 0.9
Stent diameter (mm) 3.0 ± 0.5 3.2 ± 0.5 0.001 2.9 ± 0.3 3.1 ± 0.5 < 0.001
Post-PCI TIMI flow grade 2.8 ± 0.8 2.7 ± 0.8 0.84 2.6 ± 1.0 2.6 ± 1.0 0.95
Success of primary PCI 52 (91) 514 (92) 0.92 110 (86) 252 (87) 0.72
Intra-aortic balloon pump 12 (21) 100 (18) 0.55 24 (19) 75 (26) 0.11

Values are presented as number (%) and mean ± SD.

PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction.

Pharmacological treatment

Compared with men, women received similar in-hospital medical treatment as well as medication at follow-up, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker, beta-blocker, statin therapy and diuretic agents, irrespective of age (Table 3).

Table 3. Comparison of medical therapy at discharge between women and men according to age.

< 65 years ≥ 65 years
Age group Women (n = 57) Men (n = 561) p value Women (n = 128) Men (n = 289) p value
Medication, at discharge, n (%)
Aspirin 48 (84.2) 503 (89.7) 0.21 108 (84.4) 252 (87.2) 0.44
Clopidogrel 45 (79.0) 397 (70.8) 0.19 85 (66.4) 213 (73.7) 0.13
Ticlopidin 9 (15.8) 91 (16.2) 0.93 23 (18.0) 54 (18.7) 0.87
Dual anti-platelet therapy 48 (84.2) 475 (84.7) 0.93 96 (75.0) 230 (79.6) 0.3
ACEi/ARB 32 (56.1) 307 (54.8) 0.84 66 (51.6) 162 (56.1) 0.4
Beta-blockers 25 (43.9) 264 (47.1) 0.65 55 (43.0) 119 (41.2) 0.73
Statin 33 (57.9) 262 (46.7) 0.11 59 (46.1) 131 (45.3) 0.89
Medication, at 6 months, n (%)
Aspirin 46 (80.7) 472 (84.1) 0.5 102 (79.7) 244 (84.4) 0.24
Clopidogrel 40 (70.2) 373 (66.5) 0.57 82 (64.1) 184 (53.7) 0.24
Ticlopidin 12 (21.1) 93 (16.6) 0.39 19 (14.84) 43 (14.9) 0.99
Dual anti-platelet therapy 41 (71.9) 405 (72.2) 0.97 79 (61.7) 201 (69.6) 0.12
ACEi/ARB 36 (63.2) 385 (68.6) 0.4 81 (63.3) 185 (64.0) 0.89
Beta-blockers 31 (54.4) 324 (57.8) 0.62 66 (51.6) 154 (53.3) 0.75
Statin 36 (63.2) 329 (58.6) 0.51 70 (54.7) 175 (60.6) 0.26

Values are presented as number (%) and mean ± SD.

ACEi, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers.

Prognosis

Older women experienced longer total hospital stays (11 ± 11 days vs. 9 ± 7 days, p = 0.01, Table 4) than older men. Older women also had a lower incidence of ventricular arrhythmia requiring defibrillation (6% vs. 13%, p = 0.03), and greater incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding requiring blood transfusion (20% vs. 8%, p < 0.001) than older men. There were no differences between men and women with respect to length of intensive care unit stay, in-hospital mortality, in-hospital morbidity rate (including cardiogenic shock, sepsis, cardiac rupture or tamponade, acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis, or intracranial hemorrhage), or in-hospital morbidity or mortality (all p > 0.05).

Both younger and older groups had similar follow-up periods (Table 4). The younger women had a higher incidence of heart failure requiring admission (12% vs. 1%, p < 0.001), and a higher incidence of reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission or mortality (23% vs. 6%, p < 0.001) than younger men, with no sex difference among older patients.

Table 4. Short- and long-term outcomes between women and men with STEMI according to age.

< 65 years ≥ 65 years
Age group Women (n = 57) Men (n = 561) p value Women (n = 128) Men (n = 289) p value
Short-term outcome
Length of intensive care unit stay (day) 4 ± 4 4 ± 3 0.36 5 ± 8 4 ± 4 0.23
Length of total hospital stay (day) 9 ± 8 8 ± 9 0.14 11 ± 11 9 ± 7 0.01
In-hospital morbidity 6 (11) 110 (20) 0.1 34 (27) 80 (28) 0.41
Cardiogenic shock 16 (28) 108 (19) 0.11 33 (26) 83 (29) 0.54
Ventricular arrhythmia requiring defibrillation 3 (0.2) 63 (11) 0.17 7 (6) 36 (13) 0.03
Sepsis 3 (5) 15 (3) 0.27 10 (8) 24 (8) 0.87
Bleeding complications requiring blood transfusion 4 (7) 20 (4) 0.2 26 (20) 23 (8) < 0.001
Cardiac rupture/tamponade 1 (2) 3 (1) 0.28 1 (1) 4 (1) 0.6
Acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis 1 (2) 6 (1) 0.64 3 (2) 5 (2) 0.67
Intracranial hemorrhage 0 (0) 2 (0.4) 0.65 1 (1) 1 (0.4) 0.55
In-hospital mortality 7 (12) 40 (7) 0.16 23 (18) 49 (17) 0.8
In-hospital morbidity or mortality 10 (18) 129 (23) 0.35 56 (44) 125 (43) 0.45
Long-term outcome
Repeat percutaneous coronary intervention 28 (49) 236 (42) 0.31 48 (38) 105 (36) 0.82
Reinfarction 3 (5) 13 (3) 0.27 6 (6) 9 (3) 0.25
Heart failure requiring admission 7 (12) 7 (1) < 0.001 18 (14) 35 (12) 0.58
Mortality on follow-up 4 (7) 14 (3) 0.05 12 (9) 31 (11) 0.68
Reinfarction or heart failure requiring admission or mortality 13 (23) 35 (6) < 0.001 30 (23) 60 (21) 0.6
Follow-up duration, months 50.3 ± 42.9 56.1 ± 45.4 0.33 36.3 ± 37.4 36.7 ± 35.4 0.92

Values presented as number (%) and mean ± SD.

The resulting Kaplan-Meier curves for event-free survival (with events defined as reinfarction, hear failure requiring admission, or mortality) were considerably different between women and men. Women had consistently lower event-free survival rates during the whole follow-up period in all populations (p < 0.001 by log-rank test, Figure 2A), and in the population under 65 years of age (p < 0.001 by log-rank test, Figure 2B), with no gender difference in patients older than 65 years (p = 0.70 by log-rank test, Figure 2C). Furthermore, older men had lower event-free survival rates during follow-up compared with younger men (supplementary data, Figure S1A) with no difference between older and younger women (Figure S1B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Gender differences of cumulative event-free survival curves by Kaplan-Meier analysis in (A) all patients, (B) patients < 65 years and (C) ≥ 65 years during long-term follow-up.

Figure S1.

 Figure S1

Cumulative event-free survival curves for patients < 65 years and ≥ 65 years in (A) women and (B) men.

In women, diabetes [Hazard ratio (HR) 3.18, 95% confidence internal (CI): 1.64-6.14, p < 0.001], Killip ≥ III (HR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.13-6.17, p = 0.02), and CKD (HR 3.18, 95% CI: 1.59-6.36, p = 0.001), but not age, could predict reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission, or mortality during follow-up (Table 5). In contrast, in men, age (HR 4.81, 95% CI: 3.17-7.30, p < 0.001), diabetes (HR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.19-2.72, p = 0.006), and Killip ≥ III (HR 2.92, 95% CI: 1.42-6.00, p = 0.004) could predict reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission, or mortality during follow-up. Multivariate analysis indicated that diabetes (HR 3.36, 95% CI: 1.61-6.98, p = 0.001), chronic kidney disease [odds ratio (OR) 2.23, 95% CI: 1.05-4.75, p = 0.04], and statin therapy (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.16-0.72, p = 0.005) were significantly associated with reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission, or mortality in women during follow-up. In contrast, in men, age (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05-1.10, p < 0.001), diabetes (OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.01-2.55, p = 0.04) and beta-blockers (OR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.23-0.63, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission, or mortality during follow-up.

Table 5. Baseline variables associated with reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission and mortality during follow-up by univariate and multivariate analysis with a Cox regression model.

Women Men
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value HR (95% CI) p value
Age 1.90 (0.98-3.69) 0.06 1.34 (0.62-2.93) 0.46 4.81 (3.17-7.30) < 0.001 4.43 (2.89-6.78) < 0.001
Smoking 1.53 (0.68-3.48) 0.31 1.15 (0.73-1.79) 0.55
Diabetes 3.18 (1.64-6.14) < 0.001 3.36 (1.61-6.98) 0.001 1.80 (1.19-2.72) 0.005 1.63 (1.07-2.48) 0.02
Hypertension 1.11 (0.59-2.09) 0.75 1.10 (0.74-1.65) 0.64
Hyperlipidemia 0.70 (0.32-1.52) 0.37 0.69 (0.38-1.25) 0.22
Chronic kidney disease 3.14 (1.26-7.82) 0.01 3.18 (1.59-6.36) 0.001 1.83 (1.19-2.81) 0.006 1.52 (0.98-2.36) 0.06
Killip < III 2.64 (1.13-6.17) 0.02 2.13 (0.86-5.29) 0.1 2.92 (1.42-6.00) 0.004 2.37 (1.24-4.50) 0.009
Door to balloon time, min 0.94 (0.33-2.68) 0.91 1.31 (0.7-2.44) 0.4
Single vessel disease 0.75 (0.36-1.56) 0.44 0.77 (0.50-1.21) 0.26
Beta-blockers 0.73 (0.39-1.34) 0.31 0.92 (0.46-1.83) 0.82 0.72 (0.47-1.10) 0.13 0.79 (0.53-1.19) 0.27
ACEi/ARB 0.55 (0.29-1.04) 0.07 0.57 (0.27-1.22) 0.15 1.22 (0.77-1.94) 0.4 0.88 (0.56-1.38) 0.58
Statin therapy 1.09 (0.59-1.99) 0.79 0.75 (0.39-1.42) 0.37 1.29 (1.29-2.00) 0.26 1.13 (0.73-1.75) 0.57

ACEi, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotension receptor blockers; CI, confidence interval; HR, Hazard ratio.

DISCUSSION

Major findings

Women with STEMI were more likely than men to be non-smokers with diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or anemia, irrespective of age. Infarct size was demonstrated to be smaller in women than in men, regardless of age. When mortality comparisons between women and men are undertaken, separating the younger and older patients, it becomes clear that younger women have a particularly adverse long-term prognosis compared with younger men; in contrast, older women have similar survival rates to older men.

Incidence

In the present study, patients with STEMI were predominantly male, and female patients made up about 20% of the patients admitted annually for STEMI in this institution. The mean age of women with STEMI was consistently older than men. This result is in line with previous studies indicating that women are less prone to developing STEMI than men, with a lag of approximately 10 years between the sexes. These findings may reflect different pathophysiologic processes, with STEMI being secondary to occlusive thrombus, while non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) may reflect subtotal occlusion. Furthermore, in the present study, younger female patients with STEMI had significantly higher incidence of non-obstructive infarct-related arteries compared with younger men. However, there was no difference in incidence of non-obstructive infarct-related arteries between older women and men. These differences seem to be confined to younger patients, with a significant correlation between age and sex.

Differences in clinical presentation and risk factors among men and women

The interpretation of previous studies with respect to clinical presentation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is complicated because the study populations involved have varied substantially in inclusion criteria.6,8,9,11,13 Some studies have included patients with a broader range of ACS,6,9,13 but most of these studies investigated only patients with acute MI.7,8,10-12 Several clinical studies investigated only patients eligible for certain treatments, for example thrombolytic therapy.7,8,11-13 Of these studies, some did not analyze the differences in long-term outcome between women and men.6,7,9,13 Moreover, most of the studies did not include the Asian population. It is obvious that the selection criteria used are critical to any analysis of sex differences. The present study included Asian patients with STEMI receiving primary PCI, who form an important subset of patients with ACS.

In the present study, younger women had a higher incidence of diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anemia, and atypical symptoms at presentation. Each of these findings could be attributed to the worse long-term clinical outcome during follow-up among younger women with STEMI, as compared with younger men. This finding is in accordance with previous studies, suggesting that traditional risk factors account for most of the risk of MI in both younger men and women.11,23

In these data, younger women presenting with STEMI had more risk factors and were more critically ill when compared with younger men, which in part explains their inferior long-term outcome. Since symptomatic coronary artery disease is relatively rare in younger women, a greater number or severity of risk factors may be expected in this group. Studies also suggest that pathophysiology of coronary artery disease in middle-aged or premenopausal women differs from that of older women and men, possibly due to the estrogen milieu.7,24 Younger women are more prone to plaque erosion, whereas older women and men are more prone to plaque rupture.25 Consistent with this, in the present study, no total occlusion of the infarct-related artery was observed in around a third of the younger women with STEMI, while receiving emergency coronary angiography. In addition, atypical symptoms, delayed recognition of heart disease, and missed diagnosis of MI may also contribute to the higher unadjusted mortality among younger women.26 Consistent with this, only 83% of younger women presented with typical angina at an emergency department in the present study.

Also in the present study, older women had similar short- and long-term outcomes as older men receiving primary PCI for STEMI. This finding is in accordance with other studies suggesting that the clinical outcome for older women is similar to that for older men following STEMI,5-8,14 with a few exceptions.27

Medical treatment for STEMI

Given the evidence of the benefits of early use of beta-blockers and statin therapy in STEMI patients, those without contraindication should promptly receive oral beta-blocker and statin therapy,28 irrespective of the administration of thrombolytic therapy or the performance of primary PCI. However, prescriptions for beta-blockers and statins were somewhat low in the present study. The prescription of beta-blockers and statins is still underutilized in the real world.29-31 These findings could be explained by the fact that most of the study patients were treated before the benefits of beta-blockers and statins for the treatment of STEMI were more widely understood, and thus were not as frequently recommended.28,32-34 However, the low prescription rate of these drugs in the study patients may affect the analysis of prognosis during follow-up.

Predictor for short- and long-term outcome in patients with STEMI

With age, men had an increased risk of reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission, or mortality during follow-up. However, there was no significant difference in long-term outcome among women of different ages; this suggests that women with STEMI receiving primary PCI have a worse long-term outcome, irrespective of age.

Clinical implications

The current and previous studies showed a pattern of increased mortality in younger women with STEMI compared with younger men.35 This difference may be due to complexities in gender differences. However, the findings in the present study advance our knowledge base regarding sex-related differences in patients with STEMI.

Study limitations

First, this was a retrospective study, which may have inherent shortcomings. Second, prescriptions for beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and statin therapy were underused in the present study, which may have influenced the outcome of the patients. These findings could be explained if most of the study patients were included before the benefits of these medications were widely recommended in STEMI.32,33 Similar to the patterns seen from the present study, the use of these medications in Taiwanese ACS patients reported to the Taiwan Full Spectrum Registry was suboptimal.29 However, patients were treated individually according to the experience and judgment of their clinical physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

In STEMI patients receiving primary PCI, we found that sex-related long-term outcome differences were age-dependent, with younger women likely to have a worse long-term outcome compared with younger men. In contrast, older women with STEMI receiving primary PCI had similar long-term outcome compared with older men. The higher risk in long-term outcome in younger women was not associated with a difference in the use of therapeutic modalities or medical therapies, but it was in large part driven by the fact that younger women suffering STEMI have more risk factors.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J. 1986;111:383–390. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90155-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Maynard C, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Weaver WD. Gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:972–976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosengren A, Spetz CL, Koster M, et al. Sex differences in survival after myocardial infarction in Sweden; data from the Swedish National Acute Myocardial Infarction Register. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:314–322. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Heer T, Schiele R, Schneider S, et al. Gender differences in acute myocardial infarction in the era of reperfusion (the MITRA registry) Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:511–517. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02289-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, et al. Sex-based analysis of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated predominantly with percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2002;287:210–215. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hochman JS, Tamis JE, Thompson TD, et al. Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:226–232. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199907223410402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gan SC, Beaver SK, Houck PM, et al. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality among women and men. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:8–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007063430102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gottlieb S, Harpaz D, Shotan A, et al. Sex differences in management and outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the 1990s: a prospective observational community-based study. Israeli Thrombolytic Survey Group. Circulation. 2000;102:2484–2490. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.20.2484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rosengren A, Wallentin L, K Gitt A, et al. Sex, age, and clinical presentation of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:663–670. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mueller C, Neumann FJ, Roskamm H, et al. Women do have an improved long-term outcome after non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes treated very early and predominantly with percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective study in 1,450 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:245–250. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01949-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Champney KP, Frederick PD, Bueno H, et al. The joint contribution of sex, age and type of myocardial infarction on hospital mortality following acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2009;95:895–899. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.155804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tunstall-Pedoe H, Morrison C, Woodward M, et al. Sex differences in myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the Scottish MONICA population of Glasgow 1985 to 1991. Presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and 28-day case fatality of 3991 events in men and 1551 events in women. Circulation. 1996;93:1981–1992. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.11.1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Berger JS, Elliott L, Gallup D, et al. Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2009;302:874–882. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Raine RA, Black NA, Bowker TJ, Wood DA. Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:791–797. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.10.791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vaccarino V, Krumholz HM, Berkman LF, Horwitz RI. Sex differences in mortality after myocardial infarction. Is there evidence for an increased risk for women? Circulation. 1995;91:1861–1871. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.6.1861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chandra NC, Ziegelstein RC, Rogers WJ, et al. Observations of the treatment of women in the United States with myocardial infarction:a report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:981–988. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.9.981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.MacIntyre K, Stewart S, Capewell S, et al. Gender and survival:a population-based study of 201,114 men and women following a first acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:729–735. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01465-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mega JL, Morrow DA, Ostor E, et al. Outcomes and optimal antithrombotic therapy in women undergoing fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007;115:2822–2828. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.679548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reynolds HR, Farkouh ME, Lincoff AM, et al. Impact of female sex on death and bleeding after fibrinolytic treatment of myocardial infarction in GUSTO V. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2054–2060. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Motovska Z, Widimsky P, Aschermann M. The impact of gender on outcomes of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction transported for percutaneous coronary intervention:analysis of the PRAGUE-1 and 2 studies. Heart. 2008;94:e5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.110866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2007;116:2634–2653. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Anand SS, Islam S, Rosengren A, et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction in women and men: insights from the INTERHEART study. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:932–940. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Andreotti F, Marchese N. Women and coronary disease. Heart. 2008;94:108–116. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.072769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, et al. Effect of risk factors on the mechanism of acute thrombosis and sudden coronary death in women. Circulation. 1998;97:2110–2116. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.21.2110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1163–1170. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bueno H, Vidan MT, Almazan A, et al. Influence of sex on the short-term outcome of elderly patients with a first acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1995;92:1133–1140. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:671–719. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shyu KG, Wu CJ, Mar GY, et al. Clinical characteristics, management and in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome - observations from the Taiwan ACS Full Spectrum Registry. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2011;27:135–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kozuch M, Dobrzycki S, Nowak K, et al. Lack of ST-segment depression normalization after PCI is a predictor of 5-year mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ J. 2007;71:1851–1856. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kruk M, Przyluski J, Kalinczuk L, et al. Association of non-specific inflammatory activation with early mortality in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with primary angioplasty. Circ J. 2008;72:205–211. doi: 10.1253/circj.72.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen ZM, Pan HC, Chen YP, et al. Early intravenous then oral metoprolol in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction:randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1622–1632. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67661-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jia X, Wei M, Fu X, et al. Intensive cholesterol-lowering therapy improves large artery elasticity in acute myocardial infarction patients. Heart Vessels. 2009;24:340–346. doi: 10.1007/s00380-008-1132-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Worner F, Cequier A, Bardaji A, et al. Comments on the ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2013;66:5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2012.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Milcent C, Dormont B, Durand-Zaleski I. Gender differences in hospital mortality and use of percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction:microsimulation analysis of the 1999 nationwide French hospitals database. Circulation. 2007;115:833–839. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.664979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Cardiologica Sinica are provided here courtesy of Taiwan Society of Cardiology

RESOURCES