Abstract
Purpose of the review
Significant advances have been made in understanding the functional roles of evolutionary conserved chemical modifications in RNA. By focusing on cytosine-5 methylation, we will highlight the latest insight into the mechanisms how post-transcriptional methylation contributes cell fate decisions, with implications for cancer development.
Recent findings
Several mutations in RNA-modifying enzymes have been identified to cause complex human diseases, and linked post-transcriptional modifications to fundamental cellular processes. Distinct post-transcriptional modifications are implicated in the regulation of stem cell maintenance and cellular differentiation. The dynamic deposition of a methyl mark into non-coding RNAs modulates the adaptive cellular responses to stress and alterations of methylation levels may lead to cancer.
Keywords: Cytosine-5 methylation (m5C), NSun proteins, cellular stress response, non-coding RNA, stem cells, cancer
Introduction
Homeostasis in most mammalian tissues is achieved by stem cells that continuously maintain their population (self-renewal) while generating numerous differentiated cells. During self-renewal stem cells have to avoid cell cycle exit and differentiation; whereas during differentiation stem cells must evade uncontrolled proliferation. The unique properties of stem cells are controlled by a dynamic interplay between extrinsic and intrinsic regulatory mechanisms. While extrinsic mechanisms include signalling from the neighbouring niche cells, intrinsic mechanism include epigenetic, transcriptional and translational pathways. The transcriptional regulation of stem cells is now increasingly understood in both embryonic and adult tissues, yet the precise roles of post-transcriptional mechanisms in regulating stem cell maintenance and differentiation remain unclear.
Best-characterized is the role of the microRNA pathways in regulating stem cells self-renewal and differentiation, and the importance of specific microRNAs in repressing selected mRNAs in stem and differentiated daughter cells has been shown in embryonic stem cells, germline stem cells and somatic tissue stem cells [1]. The overall function of the microRNA pathways has been studied by using for instance DGCR8 and Dicer knockout mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. Both proteins are essential for the production mature microRNAs. Interestingly, in both cases the knockout ES cells are viable but exhibit severe growth and differentiation defects [2, 3]. However, all cellular RNAs are subject to processing, quality control and surveillance pathways and at each step RNA is dynamically associated with RNA-binding proteins. Post-transcriptional modifications have emerged as important determinants for the dynamic and temporal accurate binding of proteins to their targeted RNA molecules.
Post-transcriptional methylation in multicellular organisms
More than one hundred distinct chemical modifications have been found in eukaryotic RNAs [4]. However, in multicellular organisms the enzymes responsible for each of the modification as well as the biological roles of these modifications remain unclear. Methylation is one of the most common enzyme-catalyzed modifications [4, 5]. The majority of the methyl-based modifications are conserved from bacteria to mammals and plants, and their functions include structural and metabolic stabilization as well as functional roles in regulating protein translation [6-9]. The existence of methylated nucleosides in RNA including 5-methylcytidine (m5C) and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in non-coding and coding RNA has been described decades ago, but their precise location, abundance and cellular functions have until recently remained controversial [10-15].
New approaches to capture m5C and m6A modifications transcriptome-wide confirmed dynamic and conserved methylation throughout the mammalian transcriptome [16-22]. In only a couple of years it has become evident that post-transcriptional methylation of both nucleosides regulate a wide range of fundamental cellular processes and that loss-of-function mutations in methylating and demethylating enzymes are cause of severe human diseases, including neurological disorders [23-25]. The m6A modification is most prevalent in messenger RNAs (mRNA) and has been extensively reviewed elsewhere [24, 26-29]. Therefore, we will focus on the functional and biological roles of m5C which is mainly found in non-coding RNAs [15],
Cytosine-5 methylation enzymes
Post-transcriptional cytosine-5 methylation is a widespread mark in the transcriptome of multicellular organisms [19]. All RNA:m5C methyltransferases contain a catalytic domain with a common structural core and the S-Adenosyl methionine (AdoMet) binding site. Two conserved cysteines, both located within a sequence with similarity to a methyltransferase active site are required for the transfer of the methyl group [30]. To initiate methylation, the catalytic cysteine residue forms a covalent bond with the cytosine pyrimidine ring [31]. The second conserved cysteine residue is then required to break the covalent adduct and releases the methylated RNA and the enzyme [30, 32].
The first confirmed RNA:m5C methyltransferases in multicellular organisms were the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2 and the NOP2/Sun domain RNA methyltransferase family member NSun2, both of which were found to methylate transfer RNA (tRNA) [33, 34]. In the last couple of years three more NSun family members, namely NSun4, 5 and 6 have been described to methylate mitochondrial and cytoplasmic ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and tRNA respectively (Fig. 1A) [9, 35-38]. m5C is predicted to be deposited by at least three more RNA:m5C methyltransferases (NSun 1, 3 and 7), yet their substrate specificity remains to be confirmed in mammals.
Figure 1.
(A) Cytosine-5 methylation is placed on tRNAs by the site-specific RNA methyltransferases Dnmt2, Nsun2 and Nsun6; on vault RNA by Nsun2; on mrRNA by Nsun4 and on rRNA by Nsun1 and Nsun5. (B) NSun2 and Dnmt2 tRNA methylation prevents from cleavage by angiogenin. In the absence of Nsun2- and Dnmt2-mediated tRNA methylation, tRNAs are cleaved and 5’ fragments accumulate, which results in repression of protein synthesis. tRNA: transfer RNA; mrRNA: mitochondrially transcribed ribosomal RNA; rRNA: nuclear transcribed RNA. Arrows indicate RNAs shuffling in and out of the nucleus.
One common methylation target of Dnmt2, NSun2 and NSun6 is nuclear encoded tRNA. However, the deposition of the methyl mark by these three enzymes takes place in a strict site-specific manner. While Dnmt2 targets the anti-codon loop (C38) of aspartate, valine and glycine tRNAs [33, 39], NSun2 methylates cytosines locate to the variable loop (C48-50) of most transcribed tRNAs [34, 39, 40]. NSun6 targets the 3′ end of the tRNA acceptor stem (C72) of cysteine and threonine tRNAs [35]. In contrast to Dnmt2 and NSun6, NSun2 additionally methylates other non-coding RNAs such as vault RNAs [15, 21]. The only confirmed RNA target of NSun4 is the mitochondrially encoded ribosomal RNA 12S [38]. NSun1 and 5 have also been linked to rRNA. NSun1 (Nop2/p120) orthologs in yeast and Arabidopsis have been suggested to methylate 25S rRNA [9, 41-43]. Worm, plant, fly and yeast homologs of NSun5 methylate 28S/25S rRNA in a region located in close proximity to the peptidyltransferase centre [9, 36, 41, 42]. Human NSun5 co-precipitates with ribosomes suggesting that 28S RNA may be a conserved substrate of NSun5 in mammals [44]. The substrate specificities of NSun3 and 7 are unknown. In contrast to m5C on DNA or N6-methyladenosine in mRNA, an enzyme that removes 5-methylcytosine from RNA has yet to be identified.
Functional roles of 5-methylcytidine
The functional consequences for Dnmt2- and NSun2-mediated methylation of tRNAs are now well-understood. Deposition of m5C by both enzymes protects tRNAs from endonucleolytic cleavage [39, 40, 45]. Lack of m5C at the tRNA variable loop in the absence of NSun2 increases the affinity of the endonuclease angiogenin (Fig. 1B). Angiogenin cleaves the tRNA into half and the small non-coding RNAs derived from 5’ end of the tRNAs accumulate, whereas the 3’ tRNA fragments degrade in the cells [40]. The molecular function of 5’ tRNA fragments is to repress cap-dependent translation by displacing translation initiation and elongation factors from mRNAs or by interfering with efficient transpeptidation [46-49]. Accordingly, global protein synthesis is reduced in the absence of NSun2 in vitro and in vivo [40]. In contrast, loss of Dnmt2-mediated methylation of tRNA AspGTC, GlyGCC, and ValAAC at C38 causes tRNA-specific fragmentation patterns which leads to specific codon mistranslation [50]. Cytosine-5 methylation of vault non-coding RNAs by NSun2 alters their processing into Argonaute-associated small RNA fragments that can function as microRNAs and regulate expression of targeted mRNAs [18].
Cytosine-5 methylation of rRNA is fundamental for ribosome biogenesis and therefore, influences protein synthesis. Loss of NSun4-mediated 12S rRNA methylation affects ribosomal subunits assembly and leads to a strong inhibition of mitochondrial translation [38, 51, 52]. The molecular role NSun1 and NSun5 mediated methylation in multicellular eukaryotes is unknown, but work in yeasts showed a key role in ribosome assembly and translational regulation. Loss of NSun1 yeast homolog Nop2 causes defects in pre-rRNA processing, 60S biogenesis and a significant reduction in polysome assembly [41, 43, 53, 54]. In contrast, loss of NSun5 yeast homolog Rcm1 does not affect polysome assembly, but it relaxes the 25S rRNA structure, which alters the translation fidelity only under certain stress conditions [36, 41].
The correct deposition of m5C into both tRNA and rRNA is essential for normal development. Consistent with NSun4’s essential mitochondrial function, its deletion in mice is embryonic lethal [38]. NSun2 is highest expressed in brain, skin and testis, and deletion of NSun2 impairs the development of all three tissues. In brain, loss-of-function of NSun2 causes neuro-developmental deficits (i.e. microcephaly) in mouse and human [40, 55-58]. Morphologically brain, skin and testis show significant delays in cell differentiation during development [39, 59, 60]. In skin, NSun2 expression is restricted to a distinct progenitor population in the hair follicle, and loss of NSun2 causes delays the activation of stem cells causing a delay in differentiation of hair lineages [59].
Morpholino-mediated loss of Dnmt2 in zebrafish reduced the size of the morphants by half and specifically affected liver, retina and brain development due to a failure to conduct late differentiation [61]. Deletion of Dnmt2 in mice is not lethal but endochondral ossification is delayed in newborn Dnmt2-deficient mice, which is accompanied by a reduction of the haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell population and a cell-autonomous defect in their differentiation [50].
Together, cytosine-5 RNA methylation pathways play a diverse role during development, yet they all converge in their function to ensure efficient and correct protein translation, a function that seems to be dispensable for tissue stem cell self-renewal but required for accurate lineage commitment and differentiation.
Cytosine-5 methylation pathways and the cellular stress response
Post-transcriptional control is not only important to direct the proper steps during RNA metabolism pathways, but also plays a prominent role in modulating rapid cellular responses to environmental changes [62, 63]. Deletion of m5C methyltransferases in yeast, flies, worms and mice is usually not lethal [33, 36, 41, 54, 59, 64, 65]. However, in virtually all cases, the level of m5C modification plays a key role in regulating the cellular response to stress-stimuli, including drugs, DNA damage, oxidative stress or environmental cues [40, 45, 64, 66].
Angiogenin-mediated tRNA cleavage is a conserved response to oxidative stress in eukaryotes [67-69]. Several lines of evidence suggest that angiogenin-mediated stress response is directly controlled by tRNA modifications. Levels of m5C in tRNAs change in response to oxidative stress in yeast [70]. Loss of m5C through deletion of Dnmt2 or NSun2 increases stress-induced cleavage of tRNAs and sensitizes flies, mice and human cells to oxidative stress in vivo [40, 45]. Stress-induced cleaved 5’ tRNA fragments inhibit protein synthesis by displacing translation initiation factors from mRNAs [46, 71]. The reduction of global protein synthesis is an integral part of stress responses to allow cells to alleviate cellular injury or alternatively induce apoptosis [72]. Interestingly, 5’ tRNA fragments are sufficient and required to trigger cellular stress responses, and induce the apoptotic pathway in the absence of NSun2 [40]. Thus, cellular survival during the oxidative stress response may directly require the “re-methylation” of tRNAs to ensure translational fidelity and relieve stress-induced translational bias [50, 73, 74].
Stress-induced reprogramming of the translational machinery might be a conserved mechanism. For instance changes in m5C levels in LeuCAA tRNA or 25S rRNA cause selective translation towards specific transcripts during stress responses in yeast [36, 74, 75]. While loss of m5C in tRNA sensitizes yeast, flies, mice and human cells to stress, loss of NSun5-mediated rRNA methylation increases resistance to stress stimuli and the lifespan in yeast, worms and flies [36, 40]. Ribosomes are able to modulate their translation capacity in response to various environmental stimuli by differential expression of ribosomal building blocks but one can also hypothesize that post-transcriptional modifications of rRNAs such as NSun5-mediated methylation is required to shape the ribosome in rapid responses to stress stimuli [36]. For instance ribosomes that lack pseudouridine modifications show a direct impairment in binding to internal ribosome entry (IRES) elements [73]. IRES is an RNA structured element positioned at the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of specific mRNAs that can recruit the ribosome directly to the initiation region of mRNAs with a reduced requirement for canonical initiation factors [53], and more than 10% of cellular mRNAs rely on cap-independent mechanisms which are used in response to stress stimuli [54]. Ribosomal profiling has recently uncovered enriched ribosomal occupancy in many novel upstream open reading frames (uORFs), a shift in the translation machinery that appears in stress responses [20, 52, 76]. How this shift of ribosomal occupancy is regulated is still poorly understood. Manipulating the levels of post-transcriptional modifications in rRNA may allow cells to quickly adapt and “specialize” their ribosomes, a paradigm that is emerging for heterogeneity in ribosomes as a mechanism for stress adaptation in bacteria [77].
Implications for cytosine-5 methylation pathways in cancer
The rate of tRNA synthesis is regulated by both oncogenes and tumours suppressors and tRNA levels can drive changes in mRNA translation and cell growth [78]. Besides their canonical function as decoders of the genomic code, tRNAs emerged as regulators of cell signaling through tRNA-derived small non-coding RNAs [79]. Differential abundance of small non-coding RNAs derived from cleaved tRNAs has been described for human breast and prostate cancer [80-82]. Elevated protein synthesis and perturbations in several components of the translational apparatus have been linked to increased cancer susceptibility [83].
The precise role of cytosine-5 methylation and their respective RNA methylases in cancer development, progression and metastasis is currently unclear. Dnmt2 is upregulated in multiple tumour samples [84]. Some of the 61 somatic mutations found in Dnmt2 in tumours originating from different tissues strongly modulated the enzymatic activity of Dnmt2, indicating a potential role in cancer [85]. Inhibition of Dnmt2 decreased the metabolic activity of human cancer cell lines [86]. NSun1 (also called NOP2 or p120) regulates cell cycle progression in tumourigenesis [53, 87-91]. Whether and how the enzymatic activity of NSun1 is required to mediate these cellular processes remains unclear.
NSun2 was originally identified as a transcriptional target gene for the oncogene c-Myc [92]. Genomic gain of 5p15 that includes the NSUN2 gene can result in high expression NSun2 in a range of epithelial tumours [93]. However, genomic gain of NSUN2 is not indicative of tumour malignancy and although growth of human squamous-cell-carcinoma xenografts into host mice is decreased when NSun2 is inhibited by RNAi, deletion of NSun2 in cancer cell lines does not affect proliferation or cell cycle progression [92, 93]. These opposing effects may rather reflect a role for NSun2 in stress response pathways rather than proliferation, and expression of NSun2 may increase survival of tumour cells. In fact recent evidence showed that combined knockdown of NSun2 and the tRNA methyltransferase Mettl1 in HeLa cells potentiated the sensitivity of cells to 5-Fluorouracil [66]. Whether NSun2’s role in tumourigenesis is entirely mediated through its methylating activity is currently unknown. Considering that NSun2 methylates about 80% of all expressed tRNAs and that lack of NSun2-mediated methylation causes tRNA cleavage resulting in a strong reduction of global protein synthesis [40], the main role of NSun2 downstream of c-Myc may be the coordination of protein synthesis. Myc plays an important role in regulating protein translation through transcriptional regulation of RNA and protein components of ribosomes and translation initiation factors [94, 95].
Conclusions
The role of post-transcriptional RNA methylation is far from being fully understood, but a consensus on a role in fine-tuning of protein synthesis to regulate stem cell function and differentiation is emerging. Since the vast majority of cellular non-coding RNA is involved in translation, it is not surprising that post-transcriptional modifications of RNA provide means for fast regulation of cellular protein content when necessary, for example in response to a changing microenvironment.
RNA methylation has been extensively studied in yeast, however many orthologs with a known function in yeast have not been identified in mammalian cells yet. Since many mechanisms, for instance translation initiation are considerably more complex in mammals than in yeast, novel genetically modified cells and mouse models are needed to investigate the function of RNA methyltransferases whose targets have not yet been established. Furthermore, the level of protein redundancy in RNA methylation pathways is unknown and depletion of a single RNA methylase may not be sufficient to comprehensively understand their roles in translation processes.
Recent studies revealed that modulation of RNA methylation alters cellular function and deregulation of these pathways can lead to complex diseases. However, more investigation is required to establish which molecular mechanisms are involved in mediating RNA methylation and what are the direct consequences of impaired RNA methylation pathways for instance in response to stress in vitro and in vivo. Understanding the precise molecular pathways of RNA methylation and the pathological consequences of impaired RNA methylation will allow us to develop novel therapeutic strategies for human diseases and cancer. One notable success is the development of the Mammostrat® test that uses the tRNA methyltransferase 2 homolog A (Trmt2A) as a biomarker to categorize breast cancer patient into distinct risk groups [96].
Summary.
Post-transcriptional modifications such as cytosine-5 methylation are dynamically regulated and may influence tumour development, maintenance and progression.
Key Points.
-
-
The functional roles of post-transcriptional methylation in regulating RNA functions are complex but converge in modulating protein synthesis in response to stress stimuli.
-
-
Distinct post-transcriptional modifications are dispensable for stem cell self-renewal but implicated in the accurate temporal and spatial activation of cellular differentiation programs.
-
-
Aberrant deposition of a methyl mark into non-coding RNAs impairs the adaptive cellular response and differentiation pathways and may contribute to cancer development, growth and resistance.
Acknowledgements
We thank all our collaborators and in particular Frank Lyko, Duncan Odom and John Marioni for endless and fruitful discussions on RNA methylation.
Financial support and sponsorship
Our research is funded by Cancer Research UK (CR-UK), Worldwide Cancer Research, the Medical Research Council (MRC), the European Research Council (ERC), and EMBO. Research in Michaela Frye’s laboratory is supported by a core support grant from the Wellcome Trust and MRC to the Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Cambridge Stem Cell Institute.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Gangaraju VK, Lin H. MicroRNAs: key regulators of stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(2):116–25. doi: 10.1038/nrm2621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kanellopoulou C, et al. Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev. 2005;19(4):489–501. doi: 10.1101/gad.1248505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang Y, et al. DGCR8 is essential for microRNA biogenesis and silencing of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat Genet. 2007;39(3):380–5. doi: 10.1038/ng1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Machnicka MA, et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways--2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D262–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cantara WA, et al. The RNA Modification Database, RNAMDB: 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D195–201. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Towns WL, Begley TJ. Transfer RNA methytransferases and their corresponding modifications in budding yeast and humans: activities, predications, and potential roles in human health. DNA Cell Biol. 2012;31(4):434–54. doi: 10.1089/dna.2011.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bujnicki JM, et al. Sequence-structure-function studies of tRNA:m5C methyltransferase Trm4p and its relationship to DNA:m5C and RNA:m5U methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(8):2453–63. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Motorin Y, Lyko F, Helm M. 5-methylcytosine in RNA: detection, enzymatic formation and biological functions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(5):1415–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Burgess AL, David R, Searle IR. Conservation of tRNA and rRNA 5-methylcytosine in the kingdom Plantae. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:199. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0580-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gold M, Hurwitz J, Anders M. The Enzymatic Methylation of Rna and DNA, Ii. On the Species Specificity of the Methylation Enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963;50(1):164–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.50.1.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dubin DT, Taylor RH. The methylation state of poly A-containing messenger RNA from cultured hamster cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1975;2(10):1653–68. doi: 10.1093/nar/2.10.1653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wei CM, Gershowitz A, Moss B. Methylated nucleotides block 5′ terminus of HeLa cell messenger RNA. Cell. 1975;4(4):379–86. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90158-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Perry RP, et al. The methylated constituents of L cell messenger RNA: evidence for an unusual cluster at the 5′ terminus. Cell. 1975;4(4):387–94. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90159-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bokar JA. The biosynthesis and functional roles of methylated nucleosides in eukaryotic mRNA. In: Grosjean H, editor. Fine-Tuning of RNA Functions by Modification and Editing. Springer; Berlin: 2005. pp. 141–177. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hussain S, et al. Characterizing 5-methylcytosine in the mammalian epitranscriptome. Genome Biol. 2013;14(11):215. doi: 10.1186/gb4143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meyer KD, et al. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell. 2012;149(7):1635–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dominissini D, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012;485(7397):201–6. doi: 10.1038/nature11112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hussain S, et al. NSun2-mediated cytosine-5 methylation of vault noncoding RNA determines its processing into regulatory small RNAs. Cell Rep. 2013;4(2):255–61. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Squires JE, et al. Widespread occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in human coding and non-coding RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(11):5023–33. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Somers J, Poyry T, Willis AE. A perspective on mammalian upstream open reading frame function. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45(8):1690–700. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Khoddami V, Cairns BR. Identification of direct targets and modified bases of RNA cytosine methyltransferases. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(5):458–64. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schwartz S, et al. High-resolution mapping reveals a conserved, widespread, dynamic mRNA methylation program in yeast meiosis. Cell. 2013;155(6):1409–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Blanco S, Frye M. Role of RNA methyltransferases in tissue renewal and pathology. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014;31C:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.06.006. [* Recent review on the roles of RNA methyltransferases during development and implications on human diseases.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yue Y, Liu J, He C. RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation in post-transcriptional gene expression regulation. Genes Dev. 2015;29(13):1343–55. doi: 10.1101/gad.262766.115. [* Most recent review describing the biological relevance of the m(6)A mRNA methylation machineries across eukaryotes.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sarin LP, Leidel SA. Modify or die?--RNA modification defects in metazoans. RNA Biol. 2014;11(12):1555–67. doi: 10.4161/15476286.2014.992279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee M, Kim B, Kim VN. Emerging roles of RNA modification: m(6)A and U-tail. Cell. 2014;158(5):980–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meyer KD, Jaffrey SR. The dynamic epitranscriptome: N6-methyladenosine and gene expression control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(5):313–26. doi: 10.1038/nrm3785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang X, He C. Reading RNA methylation codes through methyl-specific binding proteins. RNA Biol. 2014;11(6):669–72. doi: 10.4161/rna.28829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chandola U, Das R, Panda B. Role of the N6-methyladenosine RNA mark in gene regulation and its implications on development and disease. Brief Funct Genomics. 2015;14(3):169–79. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elu039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.King MY, Redman KL. RNA methyltransferases utilize two cysteine residues in the formation of 5-methylcytosine. Biochemistry. 2002;41(37):11218–25. doi: 10.1021/bi026055q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu Y, Santi DV. m5C RNA and m5C DNA methyl transferases use different cysteine residues as catalysts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(15):8263–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.15.8263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Redman KL. Assembly of protein-RNA complexes using natural RNA and mutant forms of an RNA cytosine methyltransferase. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(12):3321–6. doi: 10.1021/bm051012l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Goll MG, et al. Methylation of tRNAAsp by the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2. Science. 2006;311(5759):395–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1120976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brzezicha B, et al. Identification of human tRNA:m5C methyltransferase catalysing intron-dependent m5C formation in the first position of the anticodon of the pre-tRNA Leu (CAA) Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(20):6034–43. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Haag S, et al. NSUN6 is a human RNA methyltransferase that catalyzes formation of m5C72 in specific tRNAs. RNA. 2015;21(9):1532–43. doi: 10.1261/rna.051524.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schosserer M, et al. Methylation of ribosomal RNA by NSUN5 is a conserved mechanism modulating organismal lifespan. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6158. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7158. [** First study showing that the cytosine-5 methylating enzyme NSun5 modulates longevity in yeast, worms and flies and linking m5C in ribosomal RNA to translational regulation and stress response.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yakubovskaya E, et al. Structure of the essential MTERF4:NSUN4 protein complex reveals how an MTERF protein collaborates to facilitate rRNA modification. Structure. 2012;20(11):1940–7. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.08.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Metodiev MD, et al. NSUN4 is a dual function mitochondrial protein required for both methylation of 12S rRNA and coordination of mitoribosomal assembly. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(2):e1004110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004110. [* This study reveal an essential role of m5C methylation for efficient translation of mitochondrial encoded genes.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tuorto F, et al. RNA cytosine methylation by Dnmt2 and NSun2 promotes tRNA stability and protein synthesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19(9):900–5. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Blanco S, et al. Aberrant methylation of tRNAs links cellular stress to neuro-developmental disorders. EMBO J. 2014;33(18):2020–39. doi: 10.15252/embj.201489282. [** This study directly links m5C methylation to angiogenin-mediated cleavage of tRNAs to microcehaly.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sharma S, et al. Yeast Nop2 and Rcm1 methylate C2870 and C2278 of the 25S rRNA, respectively. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(19):9062–76. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gigova A, et al. A cluster of methylations in the domain IV of 25S rRNA is required for ribosome stability. RNA. 2014;20(10):1632–44. doi: 10.1261/rna.043398.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bourgeois G, et al. Eukaryotic rRNA Modification by Yeast 5-Methylcytosine-Methyltransferases and Human Proliferation-Associated Antigen p120. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ramani AK, et al. A map of human protein interactions derived from co-expression of human mRNAs and their orthologs. Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4:180. doi: 10.1038/msb.2008.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schaefer M, et al. RNA methylation by Dnmt2 protects transfer RNAs against stress-induced cleavage. Genes Dev. 2010;24(15):1590–5. doi: 10.1101/gad.586710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ivanov P, et al. Angiogenin-induced tRNA fragments inhibit translation initiation. Mol Cell. 2011;43(4):613–23. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Spriggs KA, Bushell M, Willis AE. Translational regulation of gene expression during conditions of cell stress. Mol Cell. 2010;40(2):228–37. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sobala A, Hutvagner G. Small RNAs derived from the 5′ end of tRNA can inhibit protein translation in human cells. RNA Biol. 2013;10(4):553–63. doi: 10.4161/rna.24285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gebetsberger J, et al. tRNA-derived fragments target the ribosome and function as regulatory non-coding RNA in Haloferax volcanii. Archaea. 2012;2012:260909. doi: 10.1155/2012/260909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tuorto F, et al. The tRNA methyltransferase Dnmt2 is required for accurate polypeptide synthesis during haematopoiesis. EMBO J. 2015 doi: 10.15252/embj.201591382. [** Study showing that Dnmt2-mediated methylation of tRNAs at the anti-codon loop plays an important role in haematopoiesis and it defines a novel function tRNA methylation in ensuring accurate polypeptide synthesis.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nevins TA, et al. Distinct regulation of internal ribosome entry site-mediated translation following cellular stress is mediated by apoptotic fragments of eIF4G translation initiation factor family members eIF4GI and p97/DAP5/NAT1. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(6):3572–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206781200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gerashchenko MV, Lobanov AV, Gladyshev VN. Genome-wide ribosome profiling reveals complex translational regulation in response to oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(43):17394–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120799109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sonenberg N, Hinnebusch AG. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell. 2009;136(4):731–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Spriggs KA, et al. Re-programming of translation following cell stress allows IRES-mediated translation to predominate. Biol Cell. 2008;100(1):27–38. doi: 10.1042/BC20070098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Khan MA, et al. Mutation in NSUN2, which Encodes an RNA Methyltransferase, Causes Autosomal-Recessive Intellectual Disability. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(5):856–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.03.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Martinez FJ, et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies a splicing mutation in NSUN2 as a cause of a Dubowitz-like syndrome. J Med Genet. 2012;49(6):380–5. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Abbasi-Moheb L, et al. Mutations in NSUN2 cause autosomal-recessive intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(5):847–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Komara M, et al. A Novel Single-Nucleotide Deletion (c.1020delA) in NSUN2 Causes Intellectual Disability in an Emirati Child. J Mol Neurosci. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s12031-015-0592-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Blanco S, et al. The RNA-methyltransferase Misu (NSun2) poises epidermal stem cells to differentiate. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(12):e1002403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hussain S, et al. The Mouse Cytosine-5 RNA Methyltransferase NSun2 Is a Component of the Chromatoid Body and Required for Testis Differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(8):1561–70. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01523-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rai K, et al. Dnmt2 functions in the cytoplasm to promote liver, brain, and retina development in zebrafish. Genes Dev. 2007;21(3):261–6. doi: 10.1101/gad.1472907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bartok O, et al. Adaptation of molecular circadian clockwork to environmental changes: a role for alternative splicing and miRNAs. Proc Biol Sci. 2013;280(1765):20130011. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Helm M, Alfonzo JD. Posttranscriptional RNA Modifications: playing metabolic games in a cell’s chemical Legoland. Chem Biol. 2014;21(2):174–85. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.10.015. [* Comprehensive review on post-transcriptional modifications and their function in regulating translation.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wu P, et al. NCL1, a novel gene for a non-essential nuclear protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1998;220(1-2):109–17. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(98)00330-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chernyakov I, et al. Degradation of several hypomodified mature tRNA species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mediated by Met22 and the 5′-3′ exonucleases Rat1 and Xrn1. Genes Dev. 2008;22(10):1369–80. doi: 10.1101/gad.1654308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Okamoto M, et al. tRNA Modifying Enzymes, NSUN2 and METTL1, Determine Sensitivity to 5-Fluorouracil in HeLa Cells. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(9):e1004639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004639. [* First study linking tRNA modifying enzymes to cellular resistance to cytotoxic drugs.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Thompson DM, Parker R. Stressing out over tRNA cleavage. Cell. 2009;138(2):215–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Thompson DM, et al. tRNA cleavage is a conserved response to oxidative stress in eukaryotes. RNA. 2008;14(10):2095–103. doi: 10.1261/rna.1232808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Fu H, et al. Stress induces tRNA cleavage by angiogenin in mammalian cells. FEBS Lett. 2009;583(2):437–42. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.12.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Chan CT, et al. A quantitative systems approach reveals dynamic control of tRNA modifications during cellular stress. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(12):e1001247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yamasaki S, et al. Angiogenin cleaves tRNA and promotes stress-induced translational repression. J Cell Biol. 2009;185(1):35–42. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200811106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wek RC, Jiang HY, Anthony TG. Coping with stress: eIF2 kinases and translational control. Biochem Soc Trans. 2006;34(Pt 1):7–11. doi: 10.1042/BST20060007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Jack K, et al. rRNA pseudouridylation defects affect ribosomal ligand binding and translational fidelity from yeast to human cells. Mol Cell. 2011;44(4):660–6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Endres L, Dedon PC, Begley TJ. Codon-biased translation can be regulated by wobble-base tRNA modification systems during cellular stress responses. RNA Biol. 2015;12(6):603–14. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2015.1031947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chan CT, et al. Reprogramming of tRNA modifications controls the oxidative stress response by codon-biased translation of proteins. Nat Commun. 2012;3:937. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ingolia NT, et al. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science. 2009;324(5924):218–23. doi: 10.1126/science.1168978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Vesper O, et al. Selective translation of leaderless mRNAs by specialized ribosomes generated by MazF in Escherichia coli. Cell. 2011;147(1):147–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Grewal SS. Why should cancer biologists care about tRNAs? tRNA synthesis, mRNA translation and the control of growth. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1849(7):898–907. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kirchner S, Ignatova Z. Emerging roles of tRNA in adaptive translation, signalling dynamics and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16(2):98–112. doi: 10.1038/nrg3861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lee YS, et al. A novel class of small RNAs: tRNA-derived RNA fragments (tRFs) Genes Dev. 2009;23(22):2639–49. doi: 10.1101/gad.1837609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Honda S, et al. Sex hormone-dependent tRNA halves enhance cell proliferation in breast and prostate cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(29):E3816–25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510077112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Goodarzi H, et al. Endogenous tRNA-Derived Fragments Suppress Breast Cancer Progression via YBX1 Displacement. Cell. 2015;161(4):790–802. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.053. [* This study reveals a tumor-suppressive role for specific tRNA-derived fragments and describes the underlying molecular mechanism for their action.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ruggero D. Translational control in cancer etiology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(2) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Forbes SA, et al. COSMIC: exploring the world’s knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D805–11. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Elhardt W, et al. Somatic cancer mutations in the DNMT2 tRNA methyltransferase alter its catalytic properties. Biochimie. 2015;112:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.02.022. [* This study tests how DNMT2 somatic mutations found in cancer tissues affect the activity of the enzyme.] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Schaefer M, et al. Azacytidine inhibits RNA methylation at DNMT2 target sites in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2009;69(20):8127–32. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.de Beus E, et al. Yeast NOP2 encodes an essential nucleolar protein with homology to a human proliferation marker. J Cell Biol. 1994;127(6 Pt 2):1799–813. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.6.1799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Gustafson WC, et al. Nucleolar protein p120 contains an arginine-rich domain that binds to ribosomal RNA. Biochem J. 1998;331(Pt 2):387–93. doi: 10.1042/bj3310387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Freeman JW, et al. Identification and characterization of a human proliferation-associated nucleolar antigen with a molecular weight of 120,000 expressed in early G1 phase. Cancer Res. 1988;48(5):1244–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Ochs RL, et al. Intranucleolar localization of human proliferating cell nucleolar antigen p120. Cancer Res. 1988;48(22):6523–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Perlaky L, et al. Increased growth of NIH/3T3 cells by transfection with human p120 complementary DNA and inhibition by a p120 antisense construct. Cancer Res. 1992;52(2):428–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Frye M, Watt FM. The RNA methyltransferase Misu (NSun2) mediates Myc-induced proliferation and is upregulated in tumors. Curr Biol. 2006;16(10):971–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Frye M, et al. Genomic gain of 5p15 leads to over-expression of Misu (NSUN2) in breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Schmidt EV. The role of c-myc in regulation of translation initiation. Oncogene. 2004;23(18):3217–21. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.van Riggelen J, Yetil A, Felsher DW. MYC as a regulator of ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(4):301–9. doi: 10.1038/nrc2819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Bartlett JM, et al. Mammostrat as a tool to stratify breast cancer patients at risk of recurrence during endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(4):R47. doi: 10.1186/bcr2604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

