Abstract
Objective
A positive association between the number of cigarettes smoked per day and obesity has been reported, whereas how other smoking-related indices, such as pack-years and duration of smoking, are related with obesity has been less investigated. We analyzed the age-adjusted cross-sectional association between smoking and obesity in a general Japanese population.
Methods
We used data from a nationwide epidemiological study of Japanese adults (N = 23,106). We compared the prevalence of obesity (defined as body mass index ≥ 25kg/m2) among groups classified by smoking behavior, pack-years, number of cigarettes per day, duration of smoking, and duration and time of smoking cessation.
Results
In men, current smokers had a lower odds ratio (OR) for obesity of 0.80 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72–0.88) compared to non-smokers, whereas past smokers had a higher OR of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.09–1.37) compared to current smokers. In women, there were no differences in obesity between the three groups classified by smoking behavior. However, in both sexes, the prevalence of obesity tended to increase with pack-years and the number of cigarettes per day, but not with duration of smoking in current and past smokers. Further, in male smokers, the risks for obesity were markedly higher in short-term heavy smokers compared with long-term light smokers, even with the same number of pack-years. Regarding the impact of smoking cessation, female past smokers who quit smoking at an age > 55-years had an elevated OR of 1.60 (95% CI:1.05–2.38) for obesity.
Conclusions
In a general Japanese population, obesity is progressively associated with pack-years and number of cigarettes per day, but not with the duration of smoking. When investigating the association between obesity and cigarette smoking, the daily smoking burden and the duration of smoking require to be independently considered.
Introduction
Cigarette smoking is one of the leading causes of preventable morbidity and mortality [1,2]. Several studies have indicated that smoking behavior is closely related to body weight and obesity [3–5], and shown that body weight of past smokers was heavier than that of never smokers [6–8]. The mechanisms underlying the impact of smoking on weight include varying energy intake, physical activity, metabolic rate, and inflammatory status linked to smoking status [5].
Importantly, associations between smoking and obesity have been extensively investigated in large-scale studies of subjects of Western ethnicities, but not in Asian populations [9–11]. This is of clinical importance because obesity-related complications, such as diabetes and metabolic syndrome reportedly occur at a lower BMI in Asian subjects compared with Western subjects [12–15]. Indeed, although obesity is now commonly defined in adults as a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 [16], the World Health Organization (WHO) western pacific regions have provided a different cut-off level for obesity in Asians (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) [17]. Likewise, the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity has defined obesity as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 for Japanese subjects [18]. In addition to different definitions of obesity used for different populations, a recent report noted that smoking prevalence significantly varied in Asian countries, including Japan [19]. These findings indicate the need for dedicated studies on the association between smoking and obesity in Asian countries.
In the prior publications on obesity, the number of cigarettes per day (CPD) rather than pack-years has been used. Importantly, pack-years have two elements: the degree of daily cigarette smoking (pack/day) and duration of smoking (years). However, few studies have focused separately on the impact of the two elements of pack-years on obesity. Regarding the impact of smoking cessation on body weight, some previous studies have examined the association between the duration of smoking cessation and body weight [5]. To date, however, few studies have examined the impact of age at quitting smoking on body weight [8].
The aim of this study was to analyze the association of BMI and the prevalence of obesity with the following smoking-related factors: (1) smoking status (current, past, or never smoker), (2) pack-years, (3) the number of CPD, (4) duration of smoking, (5) both the number of CPD and duration of smoking, (6) the number of years since quitting smoking, and (7) the age at time of smoking cessation in past smokers.
Methods
Study design and participants
Our data were drawn from a population-based, cross-sectional observational study conducted from July 2006 to February 2007 on Japanese subjects 20–79 years of age, living in ten different areas of Japan, to determine the nationwide prevalence of asthma [20]. Detailed methods for selecting areas, participants, questionnaire distribution, and response rates in each area have been described previously [20]. In brief, subjects were asked to complete the Japanese version of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey questionnaire [21], which included questions on height, weight and smoking status. We classified subjects according to their smoking habits [20]. The overall response rate of this study was 70.6% [20], and after excluding subjects who did not complete questions on height, weight, and CPD, data from 23,106 subjects (69.4% of initial participants of the survey; 11,245 males and 11,861 females) were analyzed.
Statistical analysis
Comparison of BMI/prevalence of obesity by smoking status
We compared BMI and prevalence of obesity among current, past, and never smokers using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey-Kramer’s post-hoc test in both sexes. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, as recommended by the WHO western pacific regions [17] and the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity [18]. The prevalence of obesity was calculated by dividing the number of obese subjects by the number of total subjects in each smoking status group.
Association between age and prevalence of obesity in groups with different by smoking status
Because age is known to have a critical impact on obesity [22–24], we evaluated the relationship between age and the prevalence of obesity for each smoking status group. We used the second order logistic regression model with intercept, linear, and quadratic terms; logit(P) = intercept +αAge + β(Age-mean Age)2.
Age-adjusted comparisons of BMI and odds ratio (OR) for obesity in groups classified by smoking status
Overall age-adjusted BMI (10-year categories) was compared among the three smoking status groups using ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer’s post-hoc test in men and women. Odds ratios (OR) for obesity and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by multiple logistic regression model using the data of never and current-smokers as reference values. The factor used for adjustment was age categories (20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79 years) [20].
Age-adjusted association between indices of smoking burden (pack-years, CPD, and duration of smoking) and obesity
The prevalence of obesity was first analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) trend test [25] after adjustment for age among current/past smokers stratified by pack-years (≤ 10, 11–20, 21–30, and >30). Age-adjusted OR was calculated as above using the data of never smokers as the reference. Subjects were then classified according to the two elements of pack-years: CPD (Men; ≤ 10, 11–20, 21–30, 30–40, and >40, Women; ≤ 10, 11–20, and >20) and duration of smoking (<10 years, 10–19 years, 20–34 years, and ≥35 years), and were analyzed in the same way as pack-years.
Age-adjusted ORs for obesity was also compared among groups stratified by both CPD and duration of smoking in male smokers. In this analysis, CPD was re-stratified by ≤ 10, 11–20, and >20, and duration of smoking was re-stratified by <10 years, 10–34 years, and ≥35 years.
Association between the duration of smoking cessation/the age at quitting smoking and obesity in past smokers
Past smokers were categorized by duration of smoking cessation and the age of smoking cessation. Then the prevalence of obesity was analyzed by CMH trend test adjusted for age. Age-adjusted ORs for obesity were compared among groups. Furthermore, past smokers with a cigarette consumption of more than 20 cigarettes per day were defined as heavy smokers, and we performed a sub-analysis to examine the relationship between obesity and duration of smoking cessation in heavy smokers or non-heavy smokers.
Statistical analyses were performed using JMP® Pro for Windows, version 10.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). For all statistical analyses, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sagamihara National Hospital and Hokkaido University. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients.
Results
Comparison of BMI/prevalence of obesity by smoking status
Table 1 shows general characteristics of subjects. Of the entire 23,106 participants, 11,245 (48.7%) were men and 11,861 (51.3%) were women. In both sexes, BMI and the prevalence of obesity of current-smokers were significantly lower than those of the never smokers. Conversely, BMI of past-smokers was significantly higher than that of current-smokers. There were also significant differences in the mean age among the three smoking statuses in both sexes.
Table 1. Characteristics of the Groups Classified by Smoking Status.
| Smoking Status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Overall | Never | Current | Past |
| n (%) | 11 245 (100.0) | 3 883 (34.5) | 4 732 (42.1) | 2 630 (23.4) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.2 ± 3.3 | 23.3 ± 3.3 | 23.0 ± 3.3* | 23.4 ± 3.1† |
| Prevalence of obesity(%) | 24.9 | 25.9 | 23.3‡ | 26.6§ |
| Age (year) | 50.3 ± 16.3 | 49.4 ± 17.8 | 47.3 ± 15.1* | 57.1 ± 14.1† ‡ |
| Pack-years | - | - | 30.2 ± 23.0 | 31.7 ± 26.2§ |
| Cigarettes per day | - | - | 20.4 ± 10.1 | 23.0 ± 13.2† |
| Women | Overall | Never | Current | Past |
| n (%) | 11 861 (100.0) | 9 907 (83.5) | 1 324 (11.1) | 630 (5.3) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.1 ± 3.4 | 22.1 ± 3.4 | 21.5 ± 3.3* | 22.0 ± 3.3† |
| Prevalence of obesity(%) | 16.7 | 17 | 13.9‡ | 17.3 |
| Age (year) | 50.8 ± 16.0 | 52.0 ± 16.0 | 43.8 ± 13.9* | 47.3 ± 14.9† ‡ |
| Pack-years | - | - | 16.5 ± 13.5 | 13.0 ± 16.6† |
| Cigarettes per day | - | - | 14.0 ± 7.4 | 13.3 ± 8.9 |
*p<0.01 v.s. never-smokers
†p<0.01 v.s. current-smokers
‡p<0.05 v.s. never-smokers
§p<0.05 v.s. current-smokers
Association between age and prevalence of obesity in groups with different by smoking status
The association between age and the prevalence of obesity were different among smoking status groups in men and women (Fig 1). In men, the association showed a non-linear quadratic trend and the prevalence of obesity peaked at around age 50 irrespective of smoking status. In contrast, in female never smokers, the association showed a quadratic trend, whereas the prevalence of obesity peaked at about 70 years. Furthermore, in past and current female smokers, the association was somewhat linear.
Fig 1. Association between age and the prevalence of obesity by smoking status in men and women.
Data were determined using the second order logistic regression model with intercept, linear, and quadratic terms: logit(P) = intercept +αAge +β(Age-mean Age)2.
Age-adjusted comparisons of BMI and odds ratio (OR) for obesity in groups classified by smoking status
Table 2 shows that, in men, current smokers had lower age-adjusted BMI and Table 3 shows ORs for obesity compared to both never or past smokers, while there were no such differences between past smokers and never smokers. In women, age-adjusted BMI and ORs did not differ among the three smoking status groups.
Table 2. Comparison of age-adjusted mean body mass index among never, current, and past smokers.
*p<0.01 v.s. never-smokers
†p<0.01 v.s. current-smokers
Table 3. Comparison of age-adjusted overall odds ratio for obesity among never, current, and past smokers.
| Men | OR v.s. never | 95% CI | P value | |
| Current | 0.8 | 0.72–0.88 | < 0.001 | |
| Past | 0.97 | 0.87–1.09 | 0.65 | |
| OR v.s. current | 95% CI | P value | ||
| Past | 1.23 | 1.09–1.37 | < 0.001 | |
| Women | OR v.s. never | 95% CI | P value | |
| Current | 1.01 | 0.85–1.19 | 0.92 | |
| Past | 1.19 | 0.95–1.47 | 0.12 | |
| OR v.s. current | 95% CI | P value | ||
| Past | 1.18 | 0.90–1.53 | 0.22 |
Age-adjusted association between indices of smoking burden (pack-years, CPD, and duration of smoking) and obesity
In both sexes, there were trends showing that the higher pack-years were, the higher the prevalence of obesity was in both current and past smokers (Tables 4 and 5). In line with this, male current smokers with ≤ 60 pack-years and male past smokers with ≤ 10 pack-years had significantly reduced ORs for obesity and, conversely, male past smokers with > 60 pack-years had a significantly increased OR (adjusted OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20–1.99, p < 0.001) (Table 4). Similarly, female past smokers with > 30 pack-years had an increased OR (adjusted OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.12–3.20, p = 0.02) (Table 5).
Table 4. Comparison of prevalence of obesity and odds ratio for obesity in male smokers stratified by pack-years.
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test | Multiple logistic regression | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking status | Pack-years | n | BMI | Prevalence of obesity (%) | P value† | Odds ratio* | 95% CI | P value |
| Current | ≤ 10 | 866 | 22.4±3.4 | 19.1 | <0.001 | 0.77 | 0.63–0.94 | 0.01 |
| 11–20 | 956 | 22.9±3.4 | 21.9 | 0.68 | 0.57–0.81 | < 0.001 | ||
| 21–30 | 854 | 23.1±3.1 | 24.7 | 0.78 | 0.65–0.93 | 0.006 | ||
| 31–60 | 1551 | 23.2±3.2 | 23.9 | 0.81 | 0.70–0.93 | 0.004 | ||
| 60 < | 475 | 23.4±3.4 | 28 | 1.05 | 0.84–1.30 | 0.67 | ||
| Past | ≤ 10 | 491 | 23.1±3.0 | 23.1 | <0.001 | 0.79 | 0.63–0.98 | 0.03 |
| 11–20 | 513 | 23.4±3.0 | 25.5 | 0.86 | 0.70–1.07 | 0.17 | ||
| 21–30 | 449 | 23.5±3.2 | 26.3 | 0.96 | 0.76–1.20 | 0.71 | ||
| 31–60 | 817 | 23.4±3.0 | 27.1 | 1.08 | 0.90–1.28 | 0.41 | ||
| 60 < | 315 | 23.7±3.3 | 34 | 1.55 | 1.20–1.99 | < 0.001 | ||
*Prevalence of obesity of never smokers was used as the reference value.
BMI, body mass index
†Each P value was calculated by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test among groups stratified by pack-years in current or past smokers.
Table 5. Comparison of prevalence of obesity and odds ratio for obesity in female smokers stratified by pack-years.
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test | Multiple logistic regression | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking status | Pack-years | n | BMI | Prevalence of obesity (%) | P value† | Odds ratio* | 95% CI | P value |
| Current | ≤ 10 | 533 | 21.1±3.2 | 10.1 | 0.009 | 1.02 | 0.75–1.36 | 0.89 |
| 11–20 | 381 | 21.2±3.0 | 11 | 0.73 | 0.52–1.00 | 0.049 | ||
| 21–30 | 225 | 22.2±3.4 | 19.6 | 1.15 | 0.81–1.60 | 0.42 | ||
| 30 < | 176 | 22.7±3.8 | 24.4 | 1.3 | 0.91–1.83 | 0.15 | ||
| Past | ≤ 10 | 379 | 21.5±3.0 | 12.1 | 0.02 | 0.93 | 0.67–1.27 | 0.66 |
| 11–20 | 111 | 22.4±3.4 | 19.8 | 1.24 | 0.75–1.95 | 0.39 | ||
| 21–30 | 56 | 22.8±3.5 | 26.8 | 1.52 | 0.81–2.70 | 0.19 | ||
| 30 < | 64 | 23.8±3.9 | 34.4 | 1.92 | 1.12–3.20 | 0.02 | ||
*Prevalence of obesity of never smokers was used as the reference value.
BMI, body mass index
†Each P value was calculated by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test among groups stratified by pack-years in current or past smokers.
Tables 6 and 7 show the results of age-adjusted analysis between CPD and obesity. In men, both current and past smokers exhibited a trend that the higher CPD was, the higher the prevalence of obesity was. In line with this finding, current smokers with ≤ 20 CPD and past smokers with ≤ 10 CPD had significantly decreased ORs and, conversely, the OR of current and past smokers with > 40 CPD had was significantly increased ORs (adjusted OR of current smokers 1.56, 95% CI 1.01–2.39, p = 0.047 and adjusted OR of past smokers 1.76, 95% CI 1.25–2.46, p = 0.001)(Table 6). In women, no such trend was evident in current smokers whereas, in past smokers, the OR was significantly increased in subjects with > 20 CPD (adjusted OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.04–3.85, p = 0.039)(Table 7).
Table 6. Comparison of prevalence of obesity and odds ratio for obesity in male smokers stratified by cigarettes smoked per day (CPD).
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test | Multiple logistic regression | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking status | CPD | n | BMI | Prevalence of obesity (%) | P value† | Odds ratio* | 95% CI | P value |
| Current | ≤ 10 | 1002 | 22.5±3.2 | 19.4 | <0.001 | 0.68 | 0.57–0.81 | < 0.001 |
| 11–20 | 2540 | 22.9±3.2 | 22.1 | 0.75 | 0.66–0.84 | < 0.001 | ||
| 21–30 | 724 | 23.3±3.3 | 26.5 | 0.91 | 0.76–1.09 | 0.32 | ||
| 31–40 | 375 | 23.6±3.8 | 30.7 | 1.09 | 0.86–1.38 | 0.47 | ||
| 40 < | 91 | 24.5±3.9 | 38.5 | 1.56 | 1.01–2.39 | 0.047 | ||
| Past | ≤ 10 | 495 | 23.0±3.1 | 22.4 | <0.001 | 0.78 | 0.62–0.98 | 0.031 |
| 11–20 | 1322 | 23.3±2.9 | 25 | 0.9 | 0.78–1.04 | 0.15 | ||
| 21–30 | 379 | 23.6±3.0 | 28.8 | 1.1 | 0.87–1.39 | 0.42 | ||
| 31–40 | 283 | 24.0±3.5 | 31.8 | 1.26 | 0.97–1.64 | 0.09 | ||
| 40 < | 152 | 24.1±3.0 | 38.8 | 1.76 | 1.25–2.46 | 0.001 | ||
*Prevalence of obesity of never smokers was used as the reference value.
BMI, body mass index
†Each P value was calculated by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test among groups stratified by CPD in current or past smokers.
Table 7. Comparison of prevalence of obesity and odds ratio for obesity in female smokers stratified by cigarettes smoked per day (CPD).
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test | Multiple logistic regression | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking status | CPD | n | BMI | Prevalence of obesity (%) | P value† | Odds ratio* | 95% CI | P value |
| Current | ≤ 10 | 645 | 21.4±3.2 | 12.1 | 0.08 | 0.9 | 0.70–1.15 | 0.42 |
| 11–20 | 608 | 21.5±3.3 | 14.8 | 1.04 | 0.82–1.31 | 0.73 | ||
| 20 < | 71 | 23.0±3.9 | 22.5 | 1.61 | 0.88–2.78 | 0.12 | ||
| Past | ≤ 10 | 372 | 21.6±3.1 | 14.5 | 0.07 | 1.02 | 0.75–1.37 | 0.89 |
| 11–20 | 214 | 22.4±3.4 | 19.2 | 1.29 | 0.90–1.82 | 0.16 | ||
| 20 < | 44 | 23.4±4.0 | 31.8 | 2.05 | 1.04–3.85 | 0.039 | ||
*Prevalence of obesity of never smokers was used as the reference value.
BMI, body mass index
†Each P value was calculated by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test among groups stratified by CPD in current or past smokers.
Tables 8 and 9 show results of the age-adjusted analysis between duration of smoking and obesity. There were no specific trends by smoking status in both sexes. However, in men, current smokers who smoked for more than 35 years had a significantly decreased OR (adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59–0.79, p < 0.001) compared with never smokers (Table 8). In contrast, in women, current smokers who smoked for less than 10 years had a significantly increased OR (adjusted OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.05–2.62, p = 0.03) compared with never smokers (Table 9).
Table 8. Comparison of prevalence of obesity and odds ratio for obesity in male smokers stratified by duration of smoking.
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test | Multiple logistic regression | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking status | Duration(year) | n | BMI | Prevalence of obesity (%) | P value† | Odds ratio* | 95% CI | P value |
| Current | < 10 | 593 | 22.1±3.6 | 16.9 | 0.16 | 0.95 | 0.72–1.23 | 0.67 |
| 10–19 | 980 | 23.2±3.5 | 24.6 | 0.82 | 0.68–0.99 | 0.04 | ||
| 20–34 | 1432 | 23.5±3.3 | 28.1 | 0.91 | 0.78–1.05 | 0.2 | ||
| 35≤ | 1696 | 22.7±3.0 | 20.4 | 0.68 | 0.59–0.79 | < 0.001 | ||
| Past | < 10 | 383 | 23.2±3.0 | 23 | 0.49 | 0.82 | 0.63–1.05 | 0.12 |
| 10–19 | 592 | 23.7±3.1 | 28.6 | 0.99 | 0.82–1.20 | 0.94 | ||
| 20–34 | 868 | 23.7±3.1 | 29.3 | 1.07 | 0.90–1.26 | 0.44 | ||
| 35≤ | 741 | 22.9±3.0 | 24.2 | 0.93 | 0.76–1.12 | 0.44 | ||
*Prevalence of obesity of never smokers was used as the reference value.
BMI, body mass index
†Each P value was calculated by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test among groups stratified by duration of smoking in current or past smokers
Table 9. Comparison of prevalence of obesity and odds ratio for obesity in female smokers stratified by duration of smoking.
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test | Multiple logistic regression | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking status | Duration(year) | n | BMI | Prevalence of obesity (%) | P value† | Odds ratio* | 95% CI | P value |
| Current | < 10 | 228 | 20.9±3.3 | 11 | 0.16 | 1.69 | 1.05–2.62 | 0.03 |
| 10–19 | 396 | 20.9±3.0 | 9.6 | 0.9 | 0.62–1.27 | 0.57 | ||
| 20–34 | 486 | 22.0±3.2 | 16 | 0.98 | 0.75–1.25 | 0.85 | ||
| 35≤ | 202 | 22.3±3.7 | 20.8 | 0.94 | 0.66–1.31 | 0.72 | ||
| Past | < 10 | 229 | 21.2±3.0 | 11.8 | 0.49 | 1.07 | 0.69–1.60 | 0.75 |
| 10–19 | 181 | 22.0±3.3 | 14.9 | 1.04 | 0.67–1.55 | 0.86 | ||
| 20–34 | 148 | 22.8±3.4 | 25 | 1.4 | 0.95–2.03 | 0.09 | ||
| 35≤ | 52 | 23.2±3.8 | 26.9 | 1.26 | 0.66–2.29 | 0.46 | ||
*Prevalence of obesity of never smokers was used as the reference value.
BMI, body mass index
†Each P value was calculated by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test among groups stratified by duration of smoking in current or past smokers
Fig 2 shows the age-adjusted ORs for obesity stratified by both CPD and duration of smoking in male current and past smokers. Male current and past smokers who smoked > 20 CPD for 0–9 years had the highest OR. In contrast, those who smoked < 10 CPD for > 35 years had the lowest OR. We did not perform this analysis in female current and past smokers because of the limited sample size, particularly of heavy long smokers.
Fig 2. Age-adjusted odds ratios (OR) for obesity of the male smokers by the number of cigarette per day (CPD) and the duration of smoking.
Age-adjusted ORs for obesity of the categories stratified by both CPD and duration of smoking in male current smokers and male past smokers. CPD was stratified by ≤ 10, 11–20, and >20. Duration of smoking was stratified by <10 years, 10–34 years, and ≥35 years.
Association between the duration of smoking cessation/the age at quitting smoking and obesity in past smokers
In both sexes, there were no significant differences in the prevalence of obesity and age-adjusted OR among groups categorized by duration of smoking cessation (S1 Table). The sub-analysis revealed that male past heavy smokers who had quit within 1 year prior to this examination had a significantly higher OR (age-adjusted OR 1.59, 95% CI; 1.10–2.28, p = 0.01, data not shown) in comparison with never smokers. The other male past smokers showed no significant differences in the OR. We could not analyze this variable for female past smokers because the number who smoked more than 20 CPD was too small (n = 44).
In men, no significant differences in the prevalence of obesity were found among groups with different age at smoking cessation categories (Table 10). However, in women, the elder the age of smoking cessation was, the higher the prevalence of obesity was. In line with this, female past smokers who quit smoking after age 55 had an increased OR for obesity (adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.05–2.38, p = 0.03).
Table 10. Comparison of prevalence of obesity and odds ratio for obesity in past smokers stratified by age of smoking cessation.
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test | Multiple logistic regression | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of smoking cessation(year) | n | BMI | Prevalence of obesity (%) | P value† | Odds ratio* | 95% CI | P value | |
| Men | < 30 | 420 | 23.2±3.1 | 22.9 | 0.41 | 0.79 | 0.62–1.01 | 0.06 |
| 30–39 | 566 | 23.7±3.1 | 29.9 | 1.03 | 0.85–1.26 | 0.74 | ||
| 40–54 | 847 | 23.6±3.1 | 28.2 | 1.04 | 0.87–1.23 | 0.69 | ||
| 55 ≤ | 758 | 23.0±3.0 | 24.7 | 1 | 0.83–1.21 | 0.96 | ||
| Women | <30 | 214 | 21.1±2.7 | 7.9 | 0.49 | 0.75 | 0.44–1.21 | 0.26 |
| 30–39 | 151 | 21.8±3.4 | 15.9 | 1.27 | 0.79–1.95 | 0.31 | ||
| 40–54 | 138 | 22.2±3.2 | 21 | 1.15 | 0.74–1.71 | 0.53 | ||
| 55 ≤ | 110 | 23.8±3.6 | 31.8 | 1.6 | 1.05–2.38 | 0.03 | ||
*Prevalence of obesity of never smokers was used as the reference value.
BMI, body mass index
†Each P value was calculated by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel trend test among groups stratified by age of smoking cessation in past smokers.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first report examining the relationship of smoking and obesity on a large scale in Japanese. There were four main findings in the present study. First, the association between age and the prevalence of obesity varied depending on gender and on smoking status. For example, the association was quadratic in men whereas it was rather linear in female smokers. Second, after adjustment for age, current smokers were less obese compared with never or past smokers in men, whereas no such impact of smoking on obesity was observed in women. Third, the prevalence of obesity tended to increase along with pack-years and CPD, but not with duration of smoking. Also, in male smokers, the risks for obesity were higher in the short-term heavy smokers as compared with the long-term light smokers, even if the pack-years were the same. Fourth, the duration of smoking cessation was not associated with obesity in either sex, whereas female past smokers who quit smoking at a later age tended to be obese.
Different association between age and the prevalence of obesity in men and women
Significant association between age and the prevalence of obesity has been reported in previous publications [7, 10, 22–24]. However, from the present study, we can indicate two novel findings. First, female never smokers had a 20-year older peak of the quadratic curve compared with male never smokers. Second, relationship of obesity and age was linear in female smokers unlike female never smokers who showed quadratic pattern. These findings may be due to hormonal differences between male and female never smokers, or between smokers and never smokers in female. Studies have shown that estrogens reduce adipose accumulation [26], thus the peak of the quadratic curve of female never smokers might delay until the menopause compared with male never smokers. Alternatively, female smokers are reported to be relatively estrogen-deficient [27], and tend to have earlier menopause [28, 29]. This may cause the accumulation of fat and the linear relationship between age and obesity due to the waning protective effect of estrogen, particularly in menopausal women.
Current smokers were less obese compared with never or past smokers in men, whereas no such impact of smoking on obesity was observed in women
Age-adjusted BMI and the prevalence of obesity were lower in male current smokers compared with never or past smokers in this study, which is in line with previous reports [6–8, 30]. Alternatively, male past smokers were not more obese compared with never smokers, which differs from previous findings in subjects with Western ethnicities [6–8, 30]. These differences may be due to ethnic differences because a recent survey on obesity among Chinese male adults showed results similar to the present study [10]. In women, however, the present study show neither weight loss among current smoker nor weight gain after smoking cessation. These findings differ from previous reports [6–8, 30]. We can only speculate that these variations are due to difference in study design including the sample size, ethnicity and/or lifestyle factors.
The prevalence of obesity tended to increase along with pack-years and CPD, but not with duration of smoking
Our results revealed that pack-years were positively associated with indices of obesity in current and past smokers of both genders. This finding is of particular interest in male current smokers, because smoking itself seemed to have an anti-obese impact, whereas conversely, the overall degree of smoking burden seemed to have a pro-obese effect. Kim et al. similarly reported positive dose-dependent associations of pack-years with abdominal and visceral obesity in past/current smokers, although overall obesity measured by BMI did not show such differences among groups with different smoking status [11].
Coexistence of both pro- and anti-obese impacts of smoking on obesity in male smokers deserves discussion. Previous studies have suggested that cigarette smoking itself, in particular nicotine, could decrease body weight by appetite suppression and/or increased energy consumption [5]. In addition, comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or malignant disease might contribute to decreased BMI. Alternatively, smoking may be associated with obesity through, for example, an unhealthy diet and low physical activity that is often present in heavy smokers [31]. The lesser association of smoking on obesity in women compared with men in the present study might have been due to hormonal or lifestyle differences between men and women in Japan.
In the present study, the number of CPD was positively associated or tended to be associated with indices of obesity in current and past smokers, whereas no consistent trend was observed for duration of smoking in both sexes. These suggest that the positive correlations between pack-years and obesity were primarily derived from CPD. Indeed, such a positive association between CPD and obesity has been reported in past and current smokers [7, 30, 32 –34]. Alternatively, we found significant negative association between smoking duration and obesity in certain subsets of smokers in both sexes. For example, male long-term (> 35 years) smokers had lower age-adjusted ORs for obesity as compared with never smokers. Similarly, Albanes et al. reported that BMI tended to decrease with longer duration of smoking irrespective of the intensity of smoking in the United States population [3]. Interestingly, there may be inter-race differences in the response of obesity to smoking duration because current smokers who had smoked for more than 20 years were more likely to be overweight in a Scottish population [8], which is in contrast to results of our study and that of another study reported from the United States [3]. Also, in the present study, female short-term smokers (< 10 years) had a significantly higher OR for obesity, which may be of social importance considering the wide belief that smoking may be a simple way to lose weight.
Different associations of pack-years, CPD, and the duration of smoking with obesity-related indices mean that use of these indices as risk markers for obesity must be done with caution. For example, 30 pack-years can be calculated in a person with a smoking history of 0.5 pack/day for 60 years as well as in a person with a smoking history of 3 packs/day for 10 years. Importantly, the present study suggested long-term light smokers tended to be less obese and, conversely, short-term heavy smokers tented to represent a more obese subset compared with age-adjusted never smokers. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to concurrently analyze the contribution of CPD and the duration of smoking on obesity, although some studies have separately analyzed the effects of CPD and the duration of smoking [3, 8].
The duration of smoking cessation was not associated with obesity in either sex, whereas female past smokers who quit smoking at a later age tended to be obese
A series of studies have revealed an increase in body weight after smoking cessation [35–37]. In the present study, male past smokers who smoked ≥ 20 CPD and quit within 1 year prior to this study had a higher OR for obesity compared with never smokers. This result was, at least partly, in accordance with results of prior studies [8, 36, 38, 39]. Alternatively, in women, the older the age of quitting smoking was, the higher the prevalence of obesity was. For example, women who quit smoking after age 55 were more likely to be obese. Interestingly, however, this result is directly opposed to the report from the United States that women younger than 55 years were at higher risk of major weight gain after quitting smoking [37]. These contrasting results might be caused by racial differences, although the true reasons for the different findings cannot be determined because of the observational nature of the studies.
When quitting at younger age, no risk for obesity was found in women in the present study. This was in accordance with results from Scotland [8]. A possible explanation for this is the anti-obese effect of estrogen in younger women as opposed to older, or menopausal, women [5]. This information may be socially important for young female current smokers, who are reluctant to stop smoking because of a fear of gaining weight.
Limitations
Limitations of our study include, first, that the study was cross-sectional in nature and, therefore, reverse causation cannot be excluded. It is, however, challenging to accurately elucidate temporal relationships between smoking behavior and BMI, and large-scale studies like the present one have been used for the investigation of such relationships. Second, no validation of the smoking data, height, and body weight was done, as all data were self-reported. However, Vartiainen et al. reported a negligible reporting bias regarding smoking in population surveys [39]. Third, though our results were adjusted by age, other potentially confounding factors, such as energy intake, physical activity, alcohol consumption, educational level, and a frequency of failure to quit smoking were not assessed. In addition, no data about pregnancy as a confounding variable were available.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the present nationwide survey on Japanese adults demonstrated gender-specific associations between age and obesity, varying impacts of CPD and the duration of smoking on obesity. In men, CPD may be a crucial factor in obesity among both current and past smokers. Alternatively, in women, our data did not support any impact of smoking on weight loss, irrespective of the smoking status. Because, in Japan, the smoking rate of women, in particular younger generations, has not decreased overtime [24], Japanese younger women should be provided with information that smoking is not useful for preventing obesity. In addition, younger generations who fear that quitting smoking will lead to weight gain should be informed that scientific data do not support this fear.
Supporting Information
*Prevalence of obesity of 524 never smokers was used as the reference value. BMI, body mass index.
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
We thank Fumio Kobayashi and Akira Eboshida for help in this epidemiological survey.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Health and Labor Science Research Grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan. The grant number is "H16—meneki—ippan—010". The URL is http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Office on Smoking and Health (US).(2006) The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US), Office on Smoking and Health (US). (2010) How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Albanes D, Jones DY, Micozzi MS, Mattson ME. (1987) Associations betweensmoking and body weight in the US population: analysis of NHANES II. Am J Public Health 77(4): 439–444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Klesges RC, Meyers AW, Klesges LM, La Vasque ME. (1989) Smoking, body weight, and their effects on smoking behavior: a comprehensive review of the literature. Psychol Bull 106 (2): 204–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Filozof C, Fernandez Pinilla MC, Fernandez-Cruz A. (2004) Smoking cessation and weight gain. Obes Rev 5 (2): 95–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Flegal KM, Troiano RP, Pamuk ER, Kuczmarski RJ, Campbell SM. (1995) The influence of smoking cessation on the prevalence of overweight in the United States. N Engl J Med 333 (18): 1165–1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chiolero A, Jacot-Sadowski I, Faeh D, Paccaud F, Cornuz J. (2007) Association of cigarettes smoked daily with obesity in a general adult population. Obesity 15 (5): 1311–1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mackay DF, Gray L, Pell JP. (2013) Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on overweight and obesity: Scotland-wide, cross-sectional study on 40,036 participants. BMC Public Health 15 (13): 348–356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kawada T. (2004) Difference of body mass index stratified by the period of smoking cessation from a cross-sectional study. Arch Med Res 35 (2): 181–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xu F, Yin XM, Wang Y.(2007) The association between amount of cigarettes smoked and overweight, central obesity among Chinese adults in Nanjing, China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 16 (2): 240–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim JH, Shim KW, Yoon YS, Lee SY, Kim SS, Oh SW. (2012) Cigarette smoking increases abdominal and visceral obesity but not overall fatness: an observational study. PLoS One 7 (9): e45815–e45820. 10.1371/journal.pone.0045815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Deurenberg P, Yap M, van Staveren WA. (1998) Body mass index and percent body fat: a meta analysis among different ethnic groups. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22 (12): 1164–1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Park YW, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Gallagher D. (2001) Larger amountsof visceral adipose tissue in Asian Americans. Obes Res 9 (7): 381–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M, Guricci S. (2002) Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat percent relationship. Obes Rev 3 (3): 141–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chang CJ, Wu CH, Chang CS, Yao WJ, Yang YC, Wu JS, et al. (2003) Low body mass index but high percent body fat in Taiwanese subjects: implications of obesity cutoffs. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 27 (2): 253–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.World Health Organization (2000): Obesity. Preventing and Managing the Global Endemic WHO Technical Report Series no 894. Geneva: WHO; [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.WHO/IASO/IOTF. (2000) The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and its Treatment. Manila, Philippines: Health Communications Australia Pty Ltd [Google Scholar]
- 18.Japan Society for the Study of Obesity. (2011) Diagnostic criteria of obesity. J Jpn Soc Study Obes 17 (Extra Edition): 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Troost JP, Barondess DA, Storr CL, Wells JE, Al-Hamzawi AO, Andrade LH, et al. (2012) An updated global picture of cigarette smoking persistence among adults. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2 (3): 135–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fukutomi Y, Nakamura H, Kobayashi F, Taniguchi M, Konno S, Nishimura M, et al. (2010) Nationwide cross-sectional population-based study on the prevalences of asthma and asthma symptoms among Japanese adults. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 153 (3): 280–287. 10.1159/000314369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Marco R, Zanolin ME, Accordini S, Signorelli D, Marinoni A, Bugiani M, et al. (1999) A new questionnaire for the repeat of the first stage of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey: a pilot study. Eur Respir J 14(5): 1044–1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. (2013) Prevalence of obesity among adults: United States, 2011–2012. NCHS Data Brief 131: 1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zaninotto P, Head J, Stamatakis E, Wardle H, Mindell J. (2009) Trends in obesity of prevalence to 2012. J Epidemiol Commun Health 63 (2): 140–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (2007) Outline for the results of the National Health and Nutrition Survey Japan. National Institute of Health and Nutrition, Tokyo. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG. (2000) Categorical data analysis using the SAS® system, second edition Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fuente-Martin E, Argente-Arizon P, Ros P, Argente J, Chowen JA. (2013) Sex differences in adipose tissue: It is not only a question of quantity and distribution. Adipocyte 2 (3): 128–134. 10.4161/adip.24075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Baron JA, La Vecchia C, Levi F. (1990) The antiestrogenic effect of cigarette smoking in women. Am J Obste Gynecol 162 (2): 502–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hermann AP, Brot C, Gram J, Kolthoff N, Mosekilde L. (2000) Premenopausal smoking and bone density in 2,015 perimenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 15 (4): 780–787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McKinlay SM, Bifano NL, McKinley JB. (1985) Smoking and age at menopause in women. Ann Intern Med 103(3): 350–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Clair C, Chiolero A, Faeh D, Cornuz J, Marques-Vidal P, Paccaud F.(2011) Dose-dependent positive association between cigarette smoking, abdominal obesity and body fat: cross-sectional data from a population-based survey. BMC Public Health 11 (23): 23–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chiolero A, Wietlisbach V, Ruffieux C, Paccaud F, Cornuz J. (2006) Clustering of risk behaviors with cigarette consumption: a population-based survey. Prev Med 42 (5): 348–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.John U, Hanke M, Rumpf HJ, Thyrian JR. (2005) Smoking status, cigarettes per day, and their relationship to overweight and obesity among former and current smokers in a national adult general population sample. Int J Obes 29 (10): 1289–1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bamia C, Trichopoulou A, Lenas D, Trichopoulos D. (2004) Tobacco smoking in relation to body fat mass and distribution in a general population sample. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28 (8): 1091–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Perkins KA. (1993) Weight gain following smoking cessation. J Consult Clin Psychol 61 (5): 768–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Caan B, Coates A, Schaefer C, Finkler L, Sternfeld B, Corbett K. (1996) Women gain weight 1 year after smoking cessation while dietary intake temporarily increases. J Am Diet Assoc 96(11): 1150–1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Froom P, Melamed S, Benbassat J. Smoking cessation and weight gain. (1998) J Fam Pract 46 (6): 460–464 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Williamson DF, Madans J, Anda RF, Kleinman JC, Giovino GA, Byers T. (1991)Smoking cessation and severity of weight gain in a national cohort. N Engl J Med 324 (11): 739–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Swan GE, Carmelli D. (1995) Characteristics associated with excessive weight gain after smoking cessation in men. Am J Public Health 85 (1): 73–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vartiainen E, Seppala T, Lillsunde P, Puska P. (2002) Validation of self reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study. J Epidemiol Community Health 56 (3): 167–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
*Prevalence of obesity of 524 never smokers was used as the reference value. BMI, body mass index.
(PDF)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.