Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;5:364. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2009-8

Table 3.

Contingency table for analysis of linkage disequilibrium between ApaI, BsmI and TaqI polymorphisms

TaqI versus BsmIa AA AG GG
TT 1 (0.29) 19 (5.56) 124 (36.26)
TC 11 (3.22) 137 (40.06) 12 (3.51)
CC 35 (10.23) 2 (0.58) 1 (0.29)
ApaI versus TaqIb TT TC CC
TT 21 (6.14) 60 (17.54) 37 (10.82)
GT 65 (19.01) 99 (28.95) 0
GG 58 (16.96) 1 (0.29) 1 (0.29)
BsmI versus ApaIc TT GT GG
AA 46 (13.45) 1 (0.29) 0
AG 55 (16.08) 102 (29.82) 1 (0.29)
GG 17 (4.97) 61 (17.84) 59 (17.25)

a TaqI versus BsmI: χ2 = 426.57, P < 0.0001*

b ApaI versus TaqI: χ2 = 158.77, P < 0.0001*

c BsmI versus ApaI: χ2 = 188.96, P < 0.0001*

* Significant data