Table 3.
TaqI versus BsmIa | AA | AG | GG |
---|---|---|---|
TT | 1 (0.29) | 19 (5.56) | 124 (36.26) |
TC | 11 (3.22) | 137 (40.06) | 12 (3.51) |
CC | 35 (10.23) | 2 (0.58) | 1 (0.29) |
ApaI versus TaqIb | TT | TC | CC |
---|---|---|---|
TT | 21 (6.14) | 60 (17.54) | 37 (10.82) |
GT | 65 (19.01) | 99 (28.95) | 0 |
GG | 58 (16.96) | 1 (0.29) | 1 (0.29) |
BsmI versus ApaIc | TT | GT | GG |
---|---|---|---|
AA | 46 (13.45) | 1 (0.29) | 0 |
AG | 55 (16.08) | 102 (29.82) | 1 (0.29) |
GG | 17 (4.97) | 61 (17.84) | 59 (17.25) |
a TaqI versus BsmI: χ2 = 426.57, P < 0.0001*
b ApaI versus TaqI: χ2 = 158.77, P < 0.0001*
c BsmI versus ApaI: χ2 = 188.96, P < 0.0001*
* Significant data