Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Mar 24;6:23641. doi: 10.1038/srep23641

Structural insights and in vitro reconstitution of membrane targeting and activation of human PI4KB by the ACBD3 protein

Martin Klima 1, Dániel J Tóth 2, Rozalie Hexnerova 1, Adriana Baumlova 1, Dominika Chalupska 1, Jan Tykvart 1, Lenka Rezabkova 3, Nivedita Sengupta 2, Petr Man 4,5, Anna Dubankova 1, Jana Humpolickova 1, Radim Nencka 1, Vaclav Veverka 1,*, Tamas Balla 2,*, Evzen Boura 1,a
PMCID: PMC4806292  PMID: 27009356

Abstract

Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta (PI4KB) is one of four human PI4K enzymes that generate phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P), a minor but essential regulatory lipid found in all eukaryotic cells. To convert their lipid substrates, PI4Ks must be recruited to the correct membrane compartment. PI4KB is critical for the maintenance of the Golgi and trans Golgi network (TGN) PI4P pools, however, the actual targeting mechanism of PI4KB to the Golgi and TGN membranes is unknown. Here, we present an NMR structure of the complex of PI4KB and its interacting partner, Golgi adaptor protein acyl-coenzyme A binding domain containing protein 3 (ACBD3). We show that ACBD3 is capable of recruiting PI4KB to membranes both in vitro and in vivo, and that membrane recruitment of PI4KB by ACBD3 increases its enzymatic activity and that the ACBD3:PI4KB complex formation is essential for proper function of the Golgi.


Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase beta (PI4KB, also known as PI4K IIIβ) is a soluble cytosolic protein yet its function is to phosphorylate membrane lipids. It is one of four human PI4K enzymes that phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol (PI) to generate phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P)1,2. PI4P is an essential lipid found in various membrane compartments including the Golgi and trans-Golgi network (TGN), the plasma membrane and the endocytic compartments. In these locations, PI4P plays an important role in cell signaling and lipid transport, and serves as a precursor for higher phosphoinositides or as a docking site for clathrin adaptor or lipid transfer proteins3. A wide range of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses (+RNA viruses), including many that are important human pathogens, hijack human PI4KA or PI4KB enzymes to generate specific PI4P-enriched organelles called membranous webs or replication factories. These structures are essential for effective viral replication4. Recently, highly specific PI4KB inhibitors were developed as potential antivirals5,6.

PI4K kinases must be recruited to the correct membrane type to fulfill their enzymatic functions. Type II PI4Ks (PI4K2A and PI4K2B) are heavily palmitoylated and thus behave as membrane proteins7. In contrast, type III PI4Ks (PI4KA and PI4KB) are soluble cytosolic proteins that are recruited to appropriate membranes indirectly via protein-protein interactions. The recruitment of PI4KA to the plasma membrane by EFR3 and TTC7 is relatively well understood even at the structural level8,9, but, the actual molecular mechanism of PI4KB recruitment to the Golgi is still poorly understood.

Acyl-coenzyme A binding domain containing protein 3 (ACBD3, also known as GCP60 and PAP7) is a Golgi resident protein10. Its membrane localization is mediated by the interaction with the Golgi integral protein golgin B1/giantin11. ACBD3 functions as an adaptor protein and signaling hub across cellular signaling pathways. ACBD3 can interact with a number of proteins including golgin A3/golgin-160 to regulate apoptosis12, Numb proteins to control asymmetric cell division and neuronal differentiation13, metal transporter DMT1 and monomeric G protein Dexras1 to maintain iron homeostasis14, and the lipid kinase PI4KB to regulate lipid homeostasis15,16. ACBD3 has been also implicated in the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases such as Huntington’s disease due to its interactions with a polyglutamine repeat-containing mutant huntingtin and the striatal-selective monomeric G protein Rhes/Dexras217. ACBD3 is a binding partner of viral non-structural 3A proteins and a host factor of several picornaviruses including poliovirus, coxsackievirus B3, and Aichi virus15,16.

We present a biochemical and structural characterization of the molecular complex composed of the ACBD3 protein and the PI4KB enzyme. We show that ACBD3 can recruit PI4KB to model membranes as well as redirect PI4KB to cellular membranes where it is not naturally found. Our data also show that ACBD3 regulates the enzymatic activity of PI4KB kinase through membrane recruitment rather than allostery.

Results

ACBD3 and PI4KB interact with 1:1 stoichiometry with submicromolar affinity

In order to verify the interactions between ACBD3 and PI4KB we expressed and purified both proteins. To increase yields of bacterial expression the intrinsically disordered region of PI4KB (residues 423–522)18 was removed (Fig. 1A). This internal deletion does not significantly affect the kinase activity19(SI Fig. 1A) or interaction with ACBD3 (SI Fig. 1B,C). In an in vitro binding assay, ACBD3 co-purified with the NiNTA-immobilized N-terminal His6GB1-tagged PI4KB (Fig. 1B, left panel), suggesting a direct interaction. Using a mammalian two-hybrid assay Greninger and colleagues20 localized this interaction to the Q domain of ACBD3 (named according to its high content of glutamine residues) and the N-terminal region of PI4KB preceding its helical domain. We expressed the Q domain of ACBD3 (residues 241–308) and the N-terminal region of PI4KB (residues 1–68) in E. coli and using purified recombinant proteins, we confirmed that these two domains are sufficient to maintain the interaction (Fig. 1B, middle and right panel).

Figure 1. Biochemical characterization of the ACBD3:PI4KB complex.

Figure 1

(A) Schematic representation of the ACBD3 and PI4KB constructs used for the experiments. ACBD3 contains the acyl-CoA binding domain (ACBD), charged amino acids region (CAR), glutamine rich region (Q), and Golgi dynamics domain (GOLD)16. PI4KB is composed of the N-terminal region, helical domain, and kinase domain which can be divided into N- and C-terminal lobes1. (B) In vitro pull-down assay. Pull-down assays were performed using NiNTA-immobilized N-terminal His6GB1-tagged proteins as indicated and untagged full-length PI4KB or ACBD3. The inputs and bound proteins were analyzed on SDS gels stained with Coomassie Blue. The asterisks mark the bands corresponding to specific interactions. Cropped gels ran the same experimental conditions are shown. Please, see SI Fig. 9 for original full-length gels. (C) Analytical Ultracentrifugation. AUC analysis of the ACBD3:PI4KB full-length complex at the concentration of 5 μM (both proteins, left panel) and ACBD3 Q domain: PI4KB N terminal region complex at the concentration of 35 μM (both proteins, right panel). (D) Surface plasmon resonance. SPR analysis of the PI4KB binding to immobilized ACBD3. Sensorgrams for four concentrations of PI4KB are shown.

Because it has been reported that ACBD3 can dimerize in a mammalian two-hybrid assay, we were interested in determining the stoichiometry of the ACBD3:PI4KB protein complex. The sedimentation coefficients of ACBD3 and PI4KB alone, or ACBD3:PI4KB complex were determined by analytical ultracentrifugation and found to be 3.1 S, 4.1 S, and 5.1 S. These values correspond to molecular weights of approximately 55 kDa, 80 kDa, and 130 kDa, respectively. This result suggests that both proteins are monomeric and the stoichiometry of the ACBD3: PI4KB protein complex is 1:1 (Fig. 1C, left panel). Similar results were obtained for the complex of the Q domain of ACBD3 and the N-terminal region of PI4KB (Fig. 1C, right panel). We also determined the strength of the interaction between recombinant full length ACBD3 and PI4KB using surface plasmon resonance (SPR). SPR measurements revealed a strong interaction with a Kd value of 320 +/−130 nM (Fig. 1D, SI Fig. 1D). We concluded that ACBD3 and PI4KB interact directly through the Q domain of ACBD3 and the N-terminal region of PI4KB forming a 1:1 complex with a dissociation constant in the submicromolar range.

Structural analysis of the ACBD3:PI4KB complex

Full length ACBD3 and PI4KB both contain large intrinsically disordered regions that impede crystallization21. We used hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis of the complex to determine which parts of the complex are well folded (SI Fig. 2). However, we were unable to obtain crystals even when using significantly truncated constructs that included only the ACBD3 Q domain and the N-terminal region of PI4KB.

For this reason, we produced an isotopically labeled ACBD3 Q domain and isotopically labeled ACBD3 Q domain:PI4KB N-terminal region protein complex and used NMR spectroscopy for structural characterization. As the N-terminal region protein complex was prepared by co-expression of both proteins, the samples consisted of an equimolar mixture of two uniformly 15N/13C labelled molecules. Comprehensive backbone and side-chain resonance assignments for the free ACBD3 Q domain and the complex, as illustrated by the 2D 15N/1H HSQC spectra (SI Figs 3 and 4), were obtained using a standard combination of triple-resonance experiments, as described previously. Backbone amide signals (15N and 1H) for the free ACBD3 Q domain were nearly completely assigned apart from the first four N-terminal residues (Met1-Lys4) and Gln44. Over 93% of non-exchangeable side-chain signals were assigned for the free ACBD3 Q domain. Apart from the four N-terminal residues, the side-chain assignments were missing for Gln25 (Hg3), Gln40 (Ha/Hb/Hg), Gln44 (Ha/Hb/Hg) and Gln48 (Hg) mainly due to extensive overlaps within the spectral regions populated by highly abundant glutamine side-chain resonances. The protein complex yielded relatively well resolved spectra (SI Fig. 4) that resulted in assignment of backbone amide signals for all residues apart from Gln2 (ACBD3) and Ala2 (PI4KB). Assignments obtained for non-exchangeable side-chain signals were over 99% complete. The essentially complete 15N, 13C and 1H resonance assignments allowed automated assignment of the NOEs identified in the 3D 15N/1H NOESY-HSQC and 13C/1H HMQC-NOESY spectra that were subsequently used in structural calculation. Structural statistics for the final water-refined sets of structures are shown in SI Table 1.

This structure revealed that the Q domain forms a two helix hairpin. The first helix bends sharply over the second helix and creates a fold resembling a three helix bundle that serves as a nest for one helix of the PI4KB N-terminus (residues 44–64, from this point on referred to as the kinase helix) (Fig. 2A). Preceding the kinase helix are three ordered residues (Val42, Ile43, and Asp44) that also contribute to the interaction (Fig. 2B). The remaining part of the PI4KB N-termini, however, is disordered (SI Fig. 5). Almost all of the PI4KB:ACBD3 interactions are hydrophobic with the exception of hydrogen bonds between the side chains of ACBD3 Tyr261 and PI4KB His63, and between the sidechain of ACBD3 Tyr288 and the PI4KB backbone (Asp44) (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, we noted that the PI4KB helix is amphipathic and its hydrophobic surface leans on the Q domain (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2. Structural analysis of the ACBD3:PI4KB complex.

Figure 2

(A) Overall structure of the ACBD3 Q domain by itself and in complex with the PI4KB N-terminal region. Superposition of the 30 converged structures obtained for the Q domain (top) and the 45 converged structures obtained for the complex (bottom), with only the folded part of PI4KB shown (see SI Fig. 2 for the complete view). (B) Detailed view of the complex. The interaction is facilitated by only two hydrogen bonds (ACBD3 Tyr261: PI4KB His63 and ACBD3 Tyr288: PI4KB Asp44), while the hydrophobic surface of the kinase helix nests in the ACBD3 Q domain. ACBD3 is shown in magenta and PI4KB in orange. (C) Top view of the kinase helix. The kinase helix is amphipathic and its hydrophobic surface overlaps with the ACBD3 binding surface (shown in magenta). Strong and weak hydrophobes are in green and cyan respectively, basic residues in blue, acidic residues in red and nonpolar hydrophilic residues in orange. (D) Pull-down assay with a NiNTA-immobilized N-terminally His6GB1-tagged PI4KB kinase and untagged ACBD3 protein. Wild type proteins and selected point mutants of both PI4KB and ACBD3 were used. Inputs and bound proteins were analyzed on SDS gels and stained with Coomassie Blue. Cropped gels ran the same experimental conditions are shown. Please, see SI Fig. 9 for original full-length gels.

To corroborate the structural data, we introduced a number of point mutations and validated their effect on complex formation using an in vitro pull-down assay (Fig. 2D). Wild type ACBD3 protein co-purified together with the NiNTA-immobilized His6-tagged wild type PI4KB as well as with the PI4KB V42A and V47A mutants, but not with mutants within the imminent binding interface (I43A, V55A, L56A). As predicted, wild type PI4KB interacted with the ACBD3 Y266A mutant and slightly with the Y285A mutant, but not with the F258A, H284A, and Y288A mutants (Fig. 2D).

ACBD3 efficiently recruits the PI4KB enzyme to membranes

We next sought to determine if the ACBD3:PI4KB interaction drives membrane localization of the PI4KB enzyme. To do this, we first established an in vitro membrane recruitment system using Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs) containing the PI4KB substrate – the PI lipid. We observed that PI4KB kinase was not membrane localized when added to the GUVs at 600 nM concentration, whereas non-covalent tethering of ACBD3 to the surface of the GUVs, using the His6 tag on ACBD3 and the DGS-NTA (Ni) lipid, led to efficient PI4KB membrane localization (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3. ACBD3 is sufficient to recruit the PI4KB kinase to membranes.

Figure 3

(A) GUVs recruitment assay. Top – Virtually no membrane bound kinase was observed when 600 nM PI4KB was added to the GUVs. Bottom – in the presence of 600 nM GUV tethered ACBD3 a significant signal of the kinase is detected on the surface of GUVs. (B) Golgi displacement experiment. Upper panel: ACBD3 Q domain fused to GFP was overexpressed and the endogenous PI4KB was immunostained. Middle panel: The same experiment performed with GFP alone. Lower panel: The same experiment performed with mutant Q domain (F258A, H284A, Y288A) that does not bind the PI4KB. (C) ACBD3 Q domain overexpression inhibits ceramide transport to Golgi – COS-7 cells transfected with wild-type ACBD3 Q domain-FKBP-mRFP were loaded with 0.05 μM Bodipy FL-Ceramide for 20 min, then washed and depicted after 20 min. Middle panel – The same experiment performed with mRFP-FKBP alone. Lower panel – The same experiment performed with mutant Q domain (F258A, H284A, Y288A) that does not bind the PI4KB. (D) Scheme of the mitochondria recruitment experiment. – The AKAP1-FRB-CFP construct is localized at the outer mitochondrial membrane, while the GFP-PI4KB and Q domain-FKBP-mRFP constructs are localized in the cytoplasm where they can form a complex. Upon addition of rapamycin the Q domain-FKBP-mRFP construct translocates to the mitochondria and takes GFP-PI4KB with it. (E) Mitochondria recruitment experiment. Left – cells transfected with AKAP1-FRB-CFP, GFP-PI4KB and wild-type Q domain-FKBP-mRFP constructs before and five minutes after addition of rapamycin. Right – The same experiment performed using the H264A Q domain mutant.

We hypothesized that if ACBD3 is one of the main Golgi localization signals for PI4KB, overexpression of the Q domain should decrease the amount of the endogenous kinase on the Golgi. Indeed, we observed loss for endogenous PI4KB signal on the Golgi in cells overexpressing the GFP – Q domain construct (Fig. 3B upper panel). We attribute the loss of signal to the immunostaining protocol-the kinase that is not bound to Golgi is lost during the permeabilization step and hence the “disappearance” of the signal because overexpression of GFP alone or a non-binding Q domain mutant has no effect on the localization of the endogenous PI4KB (Fig. 3B). Given this result, overexpression of the Q domain should also interfere with the PI4KB dependent Golgi functions. Ceramide transport and accumulation in Golgi is a well-known PI4KB dependent process22. We have used fluorescently labeled ceramide and analyzed its trafficking in non-transfected cells and cell overexpressing the Q domain. As expected, the Golgi accumulation of ceramide was not observed in cells expressing the wt Q domain while cells expressing RFP or the mutant Q domain accumulated ceramide normally (Fig. 3C) suggesting that ACBD3:PI4KB complex formation is crucial for the normal function of Golgi.

We further analyzed the function of ACBD3:PI4KB interaction in membrane recruitment of PI4KB in living cells using fluorescently tagged proteins. We used the rapamycin-inducible heteromerization of FKBP12 (FK506 binding protein 12) and FRB (fragment of mTOR that binds rapamycin) system23,24. We fused the FRB to residues 34–63 of the mitochondrial localization signal from mitochondrial A-kinase anchor protein 1 (AKAP1) and CFP. The ACBD3 Q domain was then fused to FKBP12 and mRFP (Fig. 3D). We analyzed localization of the ACBD3 Q domain and GFP – PI4KB before and after the addition of rapamycin. As a control we used H284A mutant of the ACBD3 Q domain that does not significantly bind PI4KB kinase. In every case the ACDB3 Q domain was rapidly (within 5 minutes) recruited to the mitochondrial membrane upon addition of rapamycin, but only the wild-type protein effectively directed the kinase to the mitochondria (Fig. 3E, Movie 1 and 2). Notably, we observed that when the GFP-PI4KB kinase is co-expressed with the wild-type ACDB3 Q domain it loses its typical Golgi localization (Fig. 3E upper panel). However, PI4KB retains it Golgi localization when co-expressed with the non-interacting Q domain mutant (Fig. 3E lower panel).

ACBD3 increases PI4KB enzymatic activity by recruiting PI4KB to close vicinity of its substrate

To test whether ACBD3 can stimulate PI4KB kinase enzymatic activity we performed a standard luminescent kinase assay using PI-containing micelles as the substrate25. We observed no effect on the kinase activity of PI4KB (Fig. 4A) suggesting that ACBD3 does not directly affect the enzyme (e.g. induction of a conformation change). However, in vivo ACBD3 is located at the Golgi membranes, whereas in this experiment, ACBD3 was located in the solution and PI is provided as micelles. We therefore designed a more physiologically relevant experiment. For this, we again turned to the GUV system with ACBD3 localized to the GUV membrane. The GUVs contained 10% PI to serve as a substrate for PI4KB kinase. The buffer also contained CFP-SidC, which binds to PI4P with nanomolar affinity26. This enabled visualization of the kinase reaction using a confocal microscope. We compared the efficiency of the phosphorylation reaction of the kinase alone with that of kinase recruited to the surface of the GUVs by ACBD3. Reaction was also performed in the absence of ATP as a negative control (Fig. 4B). These experiments showed that PI4KB enzymatic activity increases when ACBD3 is membrane localized (Fig. 4C, SI Fig. 6). We conclude that enzyme activation proceeds through a membrane recruitment mechanism.

Figure 4. ACBD3 indirectly increases the activity of PI4KB.

Figure 4

(A) Micelles-based kinase assay – PI in TX100 micelles was used in a luminescent kinase assay and the production of PI4P was measured. Bar graph presents the mean values of PI4P generated in the presence of the proteins as indicated, normalized to the amount of PI4P generated by PI4KB alone. Error bars are standard errors of the mean (SEM) based on three independent experiments. (B) GUV-based phosphorylation assay – GUVs containing 10% PI were used as a substrate and the production of PI4P was measured using the CFP-SidC biosensor. (C)–Quantification of the GUV phosphorylation assay – Mean membrane fluorescence intensity of the PI4P reporter (SidC-label) under different protein/ATP conditions. The mean membrane intensity value is relative to the background signal and the difference between the membrane and background signal in the reference system lacking ATP. The error bars stand for SEM based on three independent experiments (also SI Fig. 6).

Discussion

Membrane recruitment of PI4KB enzyme is crucial to ensure its proper function at the Golgi and TGN. However, the molecular mechanism and structural basis for PI4KB interaction with the membrane is poorly understood. In principle, any of the binding partners of PI4KB could play a role in membrane recruitment. To date, several PI4KB interacting proteins have been reported, including the small GTPases Rab11 and Arf1, the Golgi resident acyl-CoA binding domain containing 3 (ACBD3) protein, neuronal calcium sensor-1 (NCS-1 also known as frequenin in yeast) and the 14-3-3 proteins.

The monomeric G protein Rab11 binds mammalian PI4KB through the helical domain of the kinase. Although Rab11 does not appear to be required for recruitment of PI4KB to the Golgi, PI4KB is required for Golgi recruitment of Rab1127. Arf1, the other small GTP binding protein, is known to influence the activity and localization of PI4KB, but it does not appear to interact directly with PI4KB (our unpublished data). The yeast homologue of NCS1 called frequenin has been shown to interact with Pik1p, the yeast orthologue of PI4KB and regulate its activity and perhaps its membrane association28, but the role of NCS-1 in PI4KB recruitment in mammalian cells is unclear. NCS-1 is an N-terminally myristoylated protein that participates in exocytosis. It is expressed only in certain cell types, suggesting that if it contributes to PI4KB membrane recruitment, it does so in a tissues specific manner29. The interaction of PI4KB with 14-3-3 proteins, promoted by phosphorylation of PI4KB by protein kinase D, influences the activity of PI4KB by stabilizing its active conformation. However, 14-3-3 proteins do not appear to interfere with membrane recruitment of this kinase30. ACBD3 is a Golgi resident protein, conserved among vertebrates (SI Fig. 7), that interacts directly with PI4KB (see also SI Fig. 8 and SI Discussion), and whose genetic inactivation interferes with the Golgi localization of the kinase31. For these reasons we focused on the interaction of the PI4KB enzyme with the Golgi resident ACBD3 protein in this study.

Here we present the mechanism for membrane recruitment of PI4KB by the Golgi resident ACBD3 protein. We show that these proteins interact directly with a Kd value in the submicromolar range. The interaction is sufficient to recruit PI4KB to model membranes in vitro as well as to the mitochondria where PI4KB is never naturally found. To understand this process at the atomic level we solved the solution structure of ACBD3:PI4KB sub complex (Fig. 1A) and found that the PI4KB N-terminal region contains a short amphipatic helix (residues 44–64) that binds the ACBD3 Q domain. The Q domain adopts a helical hairpin fold that is further stabilized upon binding the kinase helix (Fig. 2A). Our data strongly suggest that formation of the complex does not directly influence the catalytic abilities of the kinase but experiments with model membranes revealed that ACBD3 enhances catalytic activity of the kinase by a recruitment based mechanism; it recruits the kinase to the membrane and thus increases the local concentration of the substrate in the vicinity of the kinase. Based on our and previously published structures we built a pseudoatomic model of PI4KB multi-protein assembly on the membrane (Fig. 5) that illustrates how the enzyme is recruited and positioned towards its lipidic substrate and how it in turn recruits Rab11.

Figure 5. Pseudoatomic model of the PI4KB multiprotein complex assembly.

Figure 5

PI4KB in orange, Rab11 in purple, ACBD3 in blue. The model is based on our NMR structure and a previously published crystal structure of PI4KB:Rab11 complex (PDB code 4D0L), ACBD and GOLD domain were homology modeled based on high sequence identity structures produced by the Phyre2 web server41. The GOLD domain is tethered to the membrane by GolginB1 (also known as Giantin)11 which is not shown for clarity. Intrinsically disordered linkers are modeled in an arbitrary but physically plausible conformation.

+RNA viruses replicate at specific PI4P-enriched membranous compartments. These are called replication factories (because they enhance viral replication) or membranous webs (because of their appearance under the electron microscope)4. To generate replication factories, viruses hijack several host factors including the PI4K kinases to secure high content of the PI4P lipid. Non-structural 3A proteins from many picornaviruses from the Enterovirus (e.g. poliovirus, coxsackievirus-B3, rhinovirus-14) and Kobuvirus (e.g. Aichi virus-1) genera directly interact with ACBD315,16. Our data suggest that they could do this via 3A:ACBD3:PI4KB complex formation. The structure of the ACBD3 Q domain and the kinase helix described here provides a novel opportunity for further research on the role of ACBD3, PI4KB, and the ACBD3:PI4KB interaction in picornaviral replication. This could eventually have implications for therapeutic intervention to combat picornaviruses-mediated diseases ranging from polio to the common cold.

Materials and Methods

Plasmid construction, protein expression, and purification

All proteins used in this study were recombinant and were expressed in E. coli using previously developed protocols32,33. Briefly, full-length human ACBD3 (UniProtKB entry Q9H3P7) and PI4KB (UniProtKB entry Q9UBF8, isoform 1) lipid kinase and their deletion mutants were cloned into a previously modified pRSFD vector (Novagen) that already contained an N-terminal 6xHis tag followed by a GB1 solubility tag and TEV protease cleavage site. Mutations were generated using the Phusion Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Thermo Scientific). The plasmids used are listed in the SI (SI Table 2). The proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21 Star cells as previously described5,34. Upon overnight expression in autoinduction media bacterial cells were harvested and lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8, 300 mM NaCl, 3 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 20 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol). The lysate was incubated with the Ni-NTA resin (Macherey-Nagel) and then extensively washed with the lysis buffer. The protein was eluted with the lysis buffer supplemented with 300 mM imidazole. When appropriate, tags were removed with TEV protease, and the protein was further purified using the size exclusion chromatography on Superdex 75 or Superdex 200 columns (GE Healthcare) in SEC buffer (10 mM Tris pH 8, 200 mM NaCl, 3 mM β-ME). Proteins were concentrated to 1–5 mg/ml (measured spectroscopically) and stored at −80 °C until needed.

In vitro pull-downs

Ni-NTA sepharose beads (Macherey-Nagel) were mixed with both binding partners (one of which was tagged with an N-terminal 6xHis tag) at a final concentration of 1 μM in a final volume of 200 μL binding buffer (30 mM Tris pH 8, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, and 1 mM TCEP). After 30 min incubation at 4 °C the beads were washed twice with 200 μL of the binding buffer, and total protein was directly eluted with the Laemmli sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

SPR (Surface plasmon resonance) and AUC (Analytical ultracentrifugation)

PI4KB was chip-immobilized as detailed in the SI. Afterwards, the ACBD3 protein was injected in a series of concentrations for 3 min and then dissociation was monitored for another 5 min. The data were fit to a single-exponential model. Rate constants of association and dissociation were obtained by fitting the observed change in resonance signal using the following equations:

graphic file with name srep23641-m1.jpg
graphic file with name srep23641-m2.jpg

where c is the protein concentration, t is time, kon is the association rate constant, koff is the dissociation rate constant, D1 and D2 are the linear drift terms, and Ras, Rdis, R0, R1, and Rmax are corresponding changes in the relative response signal.

AUC was used to perform sedimentation velocity experiments using a ProteomeLab XL-I Beckman Coulter analytical ultracentrifuge equipped with an AN50Ti rotor. All measurements were performed in 10 mM Tris pH 8, 200 mM NaCl, and 3 mM β-mercaptoethanol at 20 °C and 48000 rpm. All data were collected using an absorbance (230 nm and 280 nm) optical system. Data analysis was performed with the SEDFIT package35 and data were analyzed using a sedimentation coefficient distribution model c(s).

In vitro kinase assay

In vitro kinase activity was measured using a bioluminescent ADP-Glo assay (Promega) as described previously36. Briefly, reactions were carried out in a total volume of 5 μL in 384-well plates by diluting the indicated amounts of the PI4KB enzyme and/or ACBD3 protein into the kinase buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2% Triton-X100, 0.1 mg/mL BSA, 2 mM DTT, 50 μM phosphatidylinositol). Reaction was initiated by adding ATP to a final concentration of 100 μM. Samples were incubated for 60 min at 25 °C and the amount of hydrolyzed ATP was measured according to the manufacturer’s protocol using a TECAN infinite M 1000 plate reader.

NMR spectroscopy

NMR spectra were acquired at 25 °C on a 600 MHz and 850 MHz Bruker Avance spectrometers, both of which were equipped with a triple-resonance (15N/13C/1H) cryoprobe. The sample volume was 0.35 mL, with a 280 μM concentration for the free Q domain and a 470 μM concentration for the ACBD3:PI4KB complex in the NMR buffer (25 mM sodium phosphate pH 6.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP, 0.01% NaN3), 5% D2O/95% H2O. A series of double- and triple-resonance spectra37,38 were recorded to determine essentially complete sequence-specific resonance backbone and side-chain assignments. Constraints for 1H-1H distance required to calculate the structure of free Q domain and ACBD3:PI4KB complex were derived from 3D 15N/1H NOESY-HSQC and 13C/1H NOESY-HMQC, which were acquired using a NOE mixing time of 100 ms.

The families of converged structures for the ACBD3:PI4KB complex and free Q domain were calculated using standard software as detailed in the SI. The structures with the lowest total energy were selected and validated. The statistics for the resulting structures are summarized in SI Table 1.

Protein labeling with fluorescent dyes

PI4KB was labeled on native cysteine residues. Briefly, pure recombinant protein was incubated overnight at 4 °C with a 3x molar excess of Alexa 488 C5 maleimide (Life Technologies). The reaction was quenched by adding 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol (βME) and the protein was repurified by size exclusion chromatography.

Giant Unilamellar Vesicle Preparation and Imaging

Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs) composed of POPC (54.9 mol %), POPS (10 mol %), cholesterol (20 mol %), PI (10 mol %), DGS-NTA(Ni) [1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-[(N-(5-amino-1-carboxypentyl)iminodiacetic acid)succinyl] (nickel salt) ] (5 mol %) (Avanti Polar lipids), and ATTO647N-DOPE (0.1 mol %) (ATTO-TEC GmbH) were prepared by electroformation as described previously39, please see SI.

Live Cell Imaging

COS-7 cells were plated onto 29-mm-diameter poly-L-Lysine coated glass bottom dishes (In Vitro Scientific) at 100,000 cells/well density and transfected using the Lipofectamine2000 reagent (Invitrogen) with plasmid DNAs (0.5–1 mg/well) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The plasmids are described in SI Table 2. 24 hr post transfection, COS-7 cells were washed with a modified Krebs-Ringer solution (10 mM Na-HEPES pH 7.4, 120 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 0.7 mM MgSO4, 10 mM glucose) in the same dish and were imaged using an LSM 710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging) with a 63 × 1.4-numerical-aperture planapochromatic objective. For ceramide uptake experiments, COS-7 cells were loaded with 0.05 μM BODIPY® FL C5-Ceramide (Molecular Probes, ThermoFisher Scientific) complexed with BSA in modified Krebs-Ringer solution at room temperature for 20 min. Cells were then washed three times and imaged using the above mentioned settings.

Immunofluorescent imaging

COS-7 cells were plated onto 25-mm-diameter poly-L-Lysine coated circular glass coverslips in six-well plates (100,000 cells/well), and transfected using the Lipofectamine2000 reagent (Invitrogen) with plasmid DNAs (0.5–1 mg/well) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Twenty four hours post transfection, cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with mouse anti-PI4KB primary antibody (BD Transduction Laboratories, 1:500 dilution) and then after washing with PBS stained with Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated donkey anti-mouse secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, ThermoFisher Scientific, 1:500 dilution). Cover slips were mounted and observed with the above mentioned microscopy settings.

HD exchange

Hydrogen/deuterium exchange was performed as previously described40 with the following modifications. The exchange was done in 10 mM Tris-HCl pD 8.0, 200 mM NaCl at 20 °C. Protein concentration during the exchange was 1 μM. Aliquots (50 μL) were removed after 10, 20, 60, 120, 600, 1800, and 3600 s and the exchange was quenched by the addition of 50 μL of 0.25 M glycine-HCl pH 2.3 and rapid freezing in liquid nitrogen.

Prior to the analysis each sample was quickly thawed and injected onto an immobilized rhizopuspepsin column (bed volume 66 μL). Digestion was driven by a flow of 0.4% formic acid in water at a flow rate of 100 μL/min (LC-20AD pump, Shimadzu). The resulting peptides were trapped and desalted online on a peptide microtrap (Optimize Technologies). After a desalting step (3 min), peptides were separated using a linear gradient of 10–25% buffer B for 2 min, followed by a quick jump to 99% buffer B (buffer A = 0.4% formic acid/2% acetonitrile in water; buffer B = 95% acetonitrile/0.4% formic acid in water). The outlet of the LC system was interfaced to an electrospray ionization source of a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (12 T SolariX XR, Bruker Daltonics). Exchange was followed on 32 peptides from PI4KB (N) and 26 peptides from ACBD3(Q), covering in both cases 100% of the protein sequence. Peptides were identified by LC-MS/MS and MASCOT search against a database containing the sequences of the studied proteins. Data from H/D exchange were analyzed by program DeutEx written in the laboratory (unpublished).

Additional Information

Accession codes: The structures and assigned chemical shifts for the free Q domain and the ACBD3:PI4KB complex were deposited in PDB database under accession codes 2N72 and 2N73, and BMRB database under accession codes 25790 and 25791.

How to cite this article: Klima, M. et al. Structural insights and in vitro reconstitution of membrane targeting and activation of human PI4KB by the ACBD3 protein. Sci. Rep. 6, 23641; doi: 10.1038/srep23641 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep23641-s1.pdf (2MB, pdf)
Supplementary Video 1
Download video file (1.5MB, avi)
Supplementary Video 2
Download video file (1.9MB, avi)

Acknowledgments

The work in the laboratory of E.B. is supported by the Czech Science Foundation grant number 15-21030Y and by Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic – LO1302. The work of R.H. and V.V. was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic – LK11205 and LO1304. The work of PM was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic-LO1509. LR acknowledges the receipt of EMBO long-term and Marie Curie IEF fellowships. The Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (RVO: 61388963) is also acknowledged. Confocal imaging of cells was performed at the Microscopy & Imaging Core of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH with the kind assistance of Drs. Vincent Schram and James T. Russell. The research of D.T., N.S. and T.B. was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health. We are grateful to Prof. C. Machamer (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) for sharing the ACBD3 encoding plasmid. We are grateful to Michael Downey and Edward Curtis for critical reading of the manuscript.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions M.K. and A.D. carried out DNA cloning, M.K., A.B., D.C. and E.B. carried out protein expression and purification, M.K. performed pull-down assays, L.R. carried out analytical ultracentrifugation, M.K. and J.T. performed S.P.R. experiments, R.H. and V.V. carried out NMR experiments, structure refinement, and deposition, A.B. and P.M. performed HDX/MS experiments, D.C. carried out in vitro kinase assay, E.B. performed protein labeling, E.B. and J.H. carried out GUV preparation and imaging, D.T. and N.S. performed some of the cloning and the cell-based experiments, E.B. supervised the project, E.B., M.K., M.N., V.V. and T.B. wrote the manuscript, all authors contributed to data analysis and commented on the manuscript.

References

  1. Boura E. & Nencka R. Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases: Function, structure, and inhibition. Exp Cell Res 337, 136–145, doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.03.028 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clayton E. L., Minogue S. & Waugh M. G. Mammalian phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases as modulators of membrane trafficking and lipid signaling networks. Prog Lipid Res 52, 294–304, doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.04.002 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Balla T. Phosphoinositides: Tiny Lipids with Giant Impact on Cell Regulation. Physiological Reviews 93, 1019–1137, doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2012 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Altan-Bonnet N. & Balla T. Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases: hostages harnessed to build panviral replication platforms. Trends Biochem Sci 37, 293–302, doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.03.004 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mejdrova I. et al. Highly Selective Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase IIIbeta Inhibitors and Structural Insight into Their Mode of Action. J Med Chem 58, 3767–3793, doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00499 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keaney E. P. et al. 2-Alkyloxazoles as potent and selective PI4KIIIbeta inhibitors demonstrating inhibition of HCV replication. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 24, 3714–3718, doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.07.015 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumlova A. et al. The crystal structure of the phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase IIalpha. EMBO Rep 15, 1085–1092, doi: 10.15252/embr.201438841 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu X. et al. Structural insights into assembly and regulation of the plasma membrane phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase complex. Dev Cell 28, 19–29, doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.11.012 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chung J., Nakatsu F., Baskin J. M. & De Camilli P. Plasticity of PI4KIIIalpha interactions at the plasma membrane. EMBO Rep, doi: 10.15252/embr.201439151 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fan J., Liu J., Culty M. & Papadopoulos V. Acyl-coenzyme A binding domain containing 3 (ACBD3; PAP7; GCP60): an emerging signaling molecule. Prog Lipid Res 49, 218–234, doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2009.12.003 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sohda M. et al. Identification and characterization of a novel Golgi protein, GCP60, that interacts with the integral membrane protein giantin. J Biol Chem 276, 45298–45306, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108961200 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sbodio J. I., Hicks S. W., Simon D. & Machamer C. E. GCP60 preferentially interacts with a caspase-generated golgin-160 fragment. J Biol Chem 281, 27924–27931, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603276200 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhou Y. et al. The mammalian Golgi regulates numb signaling in asymmetric cell division by releasing ACBD3 during mitosis. Cell 129, 163–178, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.037 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheah J. H. et al. NMDA receptor-nitric oxide transmission mediates neuronal iron homeostasis via the GTPase Dexras1. Neuron 51, 431–440, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.011 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Greninger A. L., Knudsen G. M., Betegon M., Burlingame A. L. & Derisi J. L. The 3A protein from multiple picornaviruses utilizes the golgi adaptor protein ACBD3 to recruit PI4KIIIbeta. J Virol 86, 3605–3616, doi: 10.1128/JVI.06778-11 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sasaki J., Ishikawa K., Arita M. & Taniguchi K. ACBD3-mediated recruitment of PI4KB to picornavirus RNA replication sites. EMBO J 31, 754–766, doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.429 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sbodio J. I., Paul B. D., Machamer C. E. & Snyder S. H. Golgi protein ACBD3 mediates neurotoxicity associated with Huntington’s disease. Cell Rep 4, 890–897, doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.001 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Burke J. E. et al. Structures of PI4KIIIbeta complexes show simultaneous recruitment of Rab11 and its effectors. Science 344, 1035–1038, doi: 10.1126/science.1253397 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fowler M. L. et al. Using hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to engineer optimized constructs for crystallization of protein complexes: Case study of PI4KIIIbeta with Rab11. Protein Sci, doi: 10.1002/pro.2879 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Greninger A. L., Knudsen G. M., Betegon M., Burlingame A. L. & DeRisi J. L. ACBD3 interaction with TBC1 domain 22 protein is differentially affected by enteroviral and kobuviral 3A protein binding. M Bio 4, e00098–00013, doi: 10.1128/mBio.00098-13 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rozycki B. & Boura E. Large, dynamic, multi-protein complexes: a challenge for structural biology. J Phys Condens Matter 26, 463103, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/26/46/463103 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Toth B. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase IIIbeta regulates the transport of ceramide between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. J Biol Chem 281, 36369–36377, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604935200 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hammond G. R. V. et al. PI4P and PI(4,5)P-2 Are Essential But Independent Lipid Determinants of Membrane Identity. Science 337, 727–730, doi: 10.1126/science.1222483 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Varnai P., Thyagarajan B., Rohacs T. & Balla T. Rapidly inducible changes in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate levels influence multiple regulatory functions of the lipid in intact living cells. J Cell Biol 175, 377–382, doi: 10.1083/jcb.200607116 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tai A. W., Bojjireddy N. & Balla T. A homogeneous and nonisotopic assay for phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases. Anal Biochem 417, 97–102, doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.05.046 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dolinsky S. et al. The Legionella longbeachae Icm/Dot substrate SidC selectively binds phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate with nanomolar affinity and promotes pathogen vacuole-endoplasmic reticulum interactions. Infect Immun 82, 4021–4033, doi: 10.1128/IAI.01685-14 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. de Graaf P. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinasebeta is critical for functional association of rab11 with the Golgi complex. Mol Biol Cell 15, 2038–2047, doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-12-0862 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Strahl T. et al. Structural insights into activation of phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (Pik1) by yeast frequenin (Frq1). Journal of Biological Chemistry 282, 30949–30959, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705499200 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Taverna E. et al. Neuronal calcium sensor 1 and phosphatidylinositol 4-OH kinase beta interact in neuronal cells and are translocated to membranes during nucleotide-evoked exocytosis. J Cell Sci 115, 3909–3922 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hausser A. et al. Phospho-specific binding of 14-3-3 proteins to phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase III beta protects from dephosphorylation and stabilizes lipid kinase activity. J Cell Sci 119, 3613–3621, doi: 10.1242/jcs.03104 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ishikawa-Sasaki K., Sasaki J. & Taniguchi K. A complex comprising phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase III beta, ACBD3, and Aichi virus proteins enhances phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate synthesis and is critical for formation of the viral replication complex. J Virol 88, 6586–6598, doi: 10.1128/JVI.00208-14 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rezabkova L. et al. 14-3-3 protein interacts with and affects the structure of RGS domain of regulator of G protein signaling 3 (RGS3). J Struct Biol 170, 451–461, doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.03.009 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Boura E. & Hurley J. H. Structural basis for membrane targeting by the MVB12-associated beta-prism domain of the human ESCRT-I MVB12 subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 1901–1906, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117597109 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Boura E., Rezabkova L., Brynda J., Obsilova V. & Obsil T. Structure of the human FOXO4-DBD-DNA complex at 1.9 A resolution reveals new details of FOXO binding to the DNA. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 1351–1357, doi: 10.1107/S0907444910042228 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schuck P. Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. Biophys J 78, 1606–1619, doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76713-0 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Klima M. et al. The high-resolution crystal structure of phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase IIbeta and the crystal structure of phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase IIalpha containing a nucleoside analogue provide a structural basis for isoform-specific inhibitor design. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 71, 1555–1563, doi: 10.1107/S1399004715009505 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Renshaw P. S. et al. Sequence-specific assignment and secondary structure determination of the 195-residue complex formed by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins CFP-10 and ESAT-6. J Biomol NMR 30, 225–226, doi: 10.1023/B:JNMR.0000048852.40853.5c (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Veverka V. et al. NMR assignment of the mTOR domain responsible for rapamycin binding. J Biomol NMR 36 Suppl 1, 3, doi: 10.1007/s10858-005-4324-1 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Boura E., Ivanov V., Carlson L. A., Mizuuchi K. & Hurley J. H. Endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) complexes induce phase-separated microdomains in supported lipid bilayers. J Biol Chem 287, 28144–28151, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.378646 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kadek A. et al. Structural insight into the calcium ion modulated interdomain electron transfer in cellobiose dehydrogenase. FEBS Lett 589, 1194–1199, doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.03.029 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kelley L. A., Mezulis S., Yates C. M., Wass M. N. & Sternberg M. J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc 10, 845–858, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep23641-s1.pdf (2MB, pdf)
Supplementary Video 1
Download video file (1.5MB, avi)
Supplementary Video 2
Download video file (1.9MB, avi)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES