Abstract
Erianthus arundinaceus is not only an important germplasm resource for sugarcane breeding but also a potential bioenergy plant. Making clear the distribution of the chromosome ploidy of wild E. arundinaceus in china is the premise of the research and utilization of this species. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine the ploidy level and DNA content of the 55 E. arundinaceus accessions using flow cytometry and to identify the correlation between ploidy and phenotypic traits. Among the 55 accessions, four tetraploids and 51 hexaploids were identified. The four tetraploids originated from Mengma Yunnan, Shuangjiang Yunnan, Gaozhou Guangdong and Chengle Sichuan. The mean DNA content was 4.82 pg/2C for the tetraploid and 7.30 pg/2C for the hexaploid plants. The ploidy was negatively correlated with cellulose content and positively correlated (P<0.05) with plant height, stem diameter, leaf width, dry weight per plant, fresh weight per plant and hemicellulose content. However, ploidy was not correlated with leaf length, tiller number and the ratio of dry weight and fresh weight. This study will be useful for revealing the distribution of the ploidy of wild E. arundinaceus in Chin, traits markers analysis, and utilization of this species, such as cultivar improvement and sugarcane breeding in the future.
Introduction
Erianthus arundinaceus is a perennial tall herb with dense clusters, and it is one of the most important wild species that are closely related to the genus of Saccharum officinarum L. [1]. E. arundinaceus plays an important role in breeding high-yield and high-sugar content sugarcane [2–4] due to its rich intraspecific variation, strong rooting and tillering ability, wide adaptability, and doughty resistance to abiotic and biotic stressors. Although it is difficult to hybridize E. arundinaceus with sugarcane, researchers have created some Erianthus-sugarcane hybrid materials [5–7]. Alternatively, E. arundinaceus is very suitable for use as a bioenergy plant [8] due to its high biomass yield, high photosynthetic efficiency and dry matter accumulation ability [9–11].
E. arundinaceus is naturally hexaploid. However, as breeders continue to improve the germplasm, the future use of E. arundinaceus could become complicated if the ploidy level of known germplasms is unclear. In addition, ploidy level is related to many desired characteristics, such as size, adaptation to stress, and intraspecific and interspecific hybridization ability [12, 13]. China has abundant E. arundinaceus resources in Xizang, Gansu, Henan, Shanxi, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Hubei, Hunan, Sichuang, Yunnan, Fujian, Guangzhou, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan and Taiwan. Some chromosome number analyses have been reported and reflected three types of E. arundinaceus chromosome numbers: 2n = 20, 40 and 60. The 2n = 20 and 2n = 40 types are comparatively rare [14, 15]. Xiao [16] reported that the leaf width of E. arundinaceus was negatively and significantly correlated with ploidy level. Although the ploidy level of E. arundinaceus has been determined, the existing data are limited to a few cultivars.
DNA content reflects the entire and specific genetic information in all biological species [17]. Determination of the DNA content of a species not only provides important information for research on molecular genetics and cell genetics but also provides basic data for the research and genetic evolution of plant genomics. To date, the plant DNA C-values database has been established and includes 5150 species [18], including algae, mosses, ferns, gymnosperms, and angiosperms, among others [19, 20]. The DNA content in assorted plants has been determined [21]. However, little research on the DNA content of E. arundinaceus has been reported.
The traditional method for determining ploidy level is to count the number of chromosomes in a single plant cell, which has been used dependably for different species [22, 23]. However, this method is time-intensive and laborious, and the results may occasionally be inexact, especially when examining a large set of samples [24, 25]. Attempts have been made to distinguish ploidy level through morphological characteristics because plants differing in ploidy level may vary in growth habits. However, this method also has not always proven accurate. Flow cytometry has been widely used in the determination of ploidy level and DNA content and appears to be an efficient, pinpoint and powerful method [26, 27].
In our study, Sorghum ‘Bt * 623’ (Sorghum bicolor L.) was used as an internal standard [28], and 55 E. arundinaceus accessions were collected from different regions of China. Their ploidy level and DNA content were determined using flow cytometry. In addition, E. arundinaceus ‘Hainan92-105’ was used as external standard to verify the ploidy level [29, 30]. Therefore, the objectives of this study were as follows. First, ploidy level and DNA content were determined to provide basic data for the study of the genome. Second, cluster analysis of biological traits was performed as an important basis for the study of genetic differences among cultivars and the parental selection of cross breeding. Third, we assessed the correlation between ploidy level and DNA content and biological traits to quantify the impact of ploidy level.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
This study was approved by Sichuan Academy of GrasslandScience; Department of Grassland Science, Animal Science and Technology College, Nanjing Agricultural University and epartment of Grassland Science, Animal Science and Technology College, Sichuan Agricultural University. No specific permissions were required for collecting Erianthus arundinaceus samples at the locations in China, because the research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Science and Technology and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System of the People’s Republic of China, and the species is not an endangered or protected species.
Plant material
The E. arundinaceus used in this study included 55 accessions collected from seven provinces, including Shaanxi, Sichuan, Guizhou, Guangxi, Yunnan, Guangdong, and Hainan (Sichuan Academy of Grassland Science, China). The internal standard material was Sorghum ‘Bt * 623’ (Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences), and the external standard material was E. arundinaceus ‘Hainan 92–105’ (Hainan Sugarcane Hybridization Station, Guangzhou Sugarcane Industry Research Institute, China). Each accession was planted in one area (5 meters in width, 8 meters in length), with one meter distance between each area and fifteen plants evenly distributed in each. In addition to weeding during the seedling stage, regular field management was performed. In the flowering stage, growth indicators were measured to assess the plants’ characteristics.
Nuclear suspension and analysis of flow cytometry
Three plants were selected randomly for each accession, and a nuclear suspension was prepared according to the modified method of Arumuganathan and Doležel [31, 32]. First, to determine DNA content per nucleus, approximately 150 mg of fresh E. arundinaceus leaf tissue from each accession and 30 mg of sorghum leaf tissue (as an internal standard) were mixed and cut into 0.5- to 1.0-mm segments in a petri dish on ice containing 1.8 mL of solution (OttoI:OttoII = 2:1) (OttoI: 0.10 mol/L citric acid, 0.50% Tween 20; OttoII: 0.40 mol/L NaHPO4·12H2O). The excised leaf tissue was then filtered through 30-mm nylon mesh into a microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged at 5000 r/min, 4°C for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellets were resuspended in 200 μL of OttoI, followed by the addition of 30 μL of RNase (Sigma-Aldrich Company, USA) and 50 μL of PI (propidium iodide, Sigma-Aldrich Company, USA). The resuspension was incubated at 4°C for 30 min. To determine ploidy level, approximately 130 mg of fresh E. arundinaceus leaf tissue of each accession was mixed in a petri dish on ice, containing 1.5 mL of solution followed by the same remaining steps. The nuclear suspension was analyzed immediately using an Accuri C6 flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson and America company, Franklin Lakeside. NJUSA), and 200,000 nuclei were collected.
The DNA content for each sample was proportional to the amount of PI intercalating in the double-stranded DNA. The DNA content per cell was also proportional to the fluorescence intensity of PI measured by the flow cytometer. The flow cytometer records the fluorescence intensity of cells in the G1 and G2 periods for the sample. The G1 period cells precede DNA synthesis (S), and the G2 period cells have accomplished DNA replication but have not split. Thus, the 2C DNA content was calculated based on the value of the fluorescence intensity of G1 peaks for both the internal standard and the sample. The ploidy level and DNA content of the unknown samples were calculated as follows:
Measurement of traits
In the flowering stage, three individual plants for each accession were selected for measurement. The plant height and tiller number were measured from the soil surface to the top of the uppermost leaf blade. The leaf length and leaf width were measured at the reciprocal second leaves. The stem diameter was measured by tape. The stubble height used for measuring fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) per plant was 10 cm. Physiological traits including cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and crude ash were determined by the method of VanSoest and Roberston.
Data analysis
The images and data obtained by flow cytometry were analyzed using the Cytomics Expo32 software to obtain the value of the fluorescence intensity of the G1 peaks. The mean and standard error (SE) of the DNA content and traits for each tetraploid and hexaploid accession were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2003. Correlations between the DNA content and traits of 55 accessions were determined using Statistical Product and Service Solution (IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0; StatSoft launch, 2011), which was also used for clustering analysis. In addition, a tree diagram was produced using system cluster analysis. SAS/MEANS was used to calculate means. SAS/CORR was used for calculation of correlation coefficients between ploidy level, DNA content and each agronomic and physiological traits in tetraploid and hexaploid of E. arundinaceu. SAS/GLM was used for ANOVA analysis for comparing ploidy level of each agronomic, physiological trait and DNA content (SAS Institute, 2011).
Results
E. arundinaceus ploidy level and DNA content
The differences in DNA content between the tetraploid and hexaploid plants are indicated by the relative fluorescence intensity (Fig 1, S1 and S2 Datasets). Except for the meristem, which includes actively dividing cells, most of the cells were in the G1 period. Cells in the G2 period contained two-fold the amount of DNA compared with cells in G1. Among 55 accessions, four tetraploid and 51 hexaploid accessions were identified (Fig 1). The mean DNA content of the tetraploids and the hexaploids was 4.822 and 7.300 pg, respectively. Among the 51 hexaploids, the DNA content ranged from 6.981 to 8.391 pg for grasses from Sichuan province, 6.730 to 7.273 pg for grasses from Guizhou province, 6.980 to 7.416 pg for grasses from Guangdong province, 6.911 to 7.960 pg for grasses from Guangxi province, and 6.865 to 7.763 pg for grasses from Hainan province (Table 1). The tetraploids had DNA content ranging from 4.735 to 4.937 pg (Table 1). Two of these plants were from Yunnan province, and the other two plants were from the Sichuan and Guangdong provinces.
Fig 1. The fluorescence peak of tetraploid and hexaploid Erianthus arundinaceus.
Table 1. The accession number(NO.), origin, altitude, latitude, longitude, ploidy level and mean DNA content of each accessions.
| NO. | Origin | Altitude/m | Latitude/N | Longitude/E | DNA ±SE(pg) | Ploidy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Hanzhong,Shanxi | 801.0 | 32°32′22″ | 107°37′28″ | 7.407±0.026 | Hexaploid |
| E2 | Guangyuan,Sichuan | 658.0 | 30°53′11″ | 105°48′45″ | 7.543±0.066 | Hexaploid |
| E3 | Shimian,Sichuan | 1024.0 | 29°27′36″ | 102°11′29″ | 7.274±0.025 | Hexaploid |
| E4 | Xichang,Sichuan | 1475.0 | 27°46′58″ | 102°12′42″ | 8.032±0.035 | Hexaploid |
| E5 | Panzhihua,Sichuan | 962.0 | 26°37′23″ | 101°48′36″ | 7.274±0.060 | Hexaploid |
| E6 | Huili,Sichuan | 1743.0 | 26°38′06″ | 102°15′03″ | 7.938±0.334 | Hexaploid |
| E8 | Ningnan,Sichuan | 694.0 | 26°58′59″ | 102°48′23″ | 7.860±0.107 | Hexaploid |
| E9 | Heishui,Sichuan | 2350.0 | 32°09′41″ | 103°02′49″ | 7.045±0.034 | Hexaploid |
| E10 | Hanyuan,Sichuan | 891.0 | 29°26′40″ | 102°37′01″ | 7.066±0.098 | Hexaploid |
| E11 | Doujun,Guizhou | 840.8 | 26°16′32″ | 107°29′58″ | 7.273±0.047 | Hexaploid |
| E12 | Dushan,Guizhou | 943.8 | 25°45′32″ | 107°34′18″ | 7.330±0.060 | Hexaploid |
| E13 | Libo,Guizhou | 546.3 | 25°27′22″ | 107°53′16″ | 7.075±0.039 | Hexaploid |
| E14 | Sandou,Guizhou | 740.8 | 25°30′39″ | 107°31′53″ | 6.730±0.079 | Hexaploid |
| E15 | Congjiang,Guizhou | 180.0 | 25°47′06″ | 109°03′50″ | 7.300±0.047 | Hexaploid |
| E16 | Rongjiang,Guizhou | 235.0 | 25°56′20″ | 108°31′33″ | 7.232±0.027 | Hexaploid |
| E17 | Nandan,Guangxi | 1127.0 | 25°06′08″ | 107°29′60″ | 7.128±0.041 | Hexaploid |
| E18 | Hechi,Guangxi | 283.8 | 24°39′00″ | 107°51′49″ | 6.911±0.155 | Hexaploid |
| E19 | Duan,Guangxi | 148.8 | 24°03′15″ | 108°02′46″ | 7.256±0.088 | Hexaploid |
| E20 | Wuzhou,Guangxi | 39.0 | 23°29′27″ | 111°15′05″ | 7.084±0.097 | Hexaploid |
| E21 | Nanning,Guangxi | 89.7 | 22°37′39″ | 108°23′02″ | 7.482±0.107 | Hexaploid |
| E22 | Shaoping,Guangxi | 72.0 | 23°58′07″ | 111°06′01″ | 7.363±0.112 | Hexaploid |
| E23 | Zhongshan,Guangxi | 157.6 | 24°27′26″ | 111°05′20″ | 7.960±0.044 | Hexaploid |
| E24 | Pingle,Guangxi | 113.0 | 24°38′49″ | 110°38′22″ | 7.705±0.022 | Hexaploid |
| E25 | Guilin,Guangxi | 166.0 | 25°18′43″ | 110°08′31″ | 7.454±0.048 | Hexaploid |
| E26 | Longsheng,Guangxi | 226.0 | 25°48′11″ | 109°59′23″ | 7.485±0.108 | Hexaploid |
| E27 | Sanjiang,Guangxi | 168.0 | 25°46′45″ | 109°38′47″ | 7.065±0.034 | Hexaploid |
| E28 | Mengma,Yunnan | 531.0 | 30°23′54″ | 99°48′17″ | 4.937±0.068 | Tetraploid |
| E29 | Shuangjiang,Yunnan | 670.0 | 29°32′42″ | 99°49′11″ | 4.815±0.070 | Tetraploid |
| E30 | Lancang,Yunnan | 436.0 | 30°44′03″ | 99°48′30″ | 7.149±0.074 | Hexaploid |
| E33 | Suixi,Guangdong | 43.0 | 21°33′26″ | 110°00′52″ | 7.416±0.152 | Hexaploid |
| E35 | Gaozhou,Guangdong | 40.0 | 21°53′33″ | 110°49′46″ | 4.735±0.066 | Tetraploid |
| E36 | Xuwen,Guangdong | 9.0 | 20°55′15″ | 110°03′32″ | 7.372±0.119 | Hexaploid |
| E37 | Xinyi,Guangdong | 109.4 | 22°20′57″ | 110°54′44″ | 6.980±0.078 | Hexaploid |
| E38 | Hankou,Hannan | 4.3 | 20°01′50″ | 110°19′44″ | 6.865±0.113 | Hexaploid |
| E39 | Dingan,Hannan | 40.0 | 19°05′25″ | 110°10′47″ | 7.717±0.084 | Hexaploid |
| E40 | Tunchang,Hannan | 140.0 | 19°12′10″ | 109°59′05″ | 7.763±0.126 | Hexaploid |
| E41 | Wuzhishan,Hannan | 214.0 | 18°59′04″ | 109°33′56″ | 7.381±0.073 | Hexaploid |
| E42 | Baoting,Hannan | 71.0 | 18°33′47″ | 109°37′20″ | 7.208±0.041 | Hexaploid |
| E43 | Dongfang,Hannan | -2.0 | 18°56′51″ | 108°41′59″ | 7.163±0.382 | Hexaploid |
| E44 | Sanya,Hannan | 30.0 | 18°33′48″ | 109°37′20″ | 7.412±0.361 | Hexaploid |
| E45 | Sanyajiusuo,Hannnan | -32.0 | 18°25′47″ | 108°56′06″ | 7.489±0.203 | Hexaploid |
| E46 | Changjiang,Hannan | 78.0 | 19°19′12″ | 108°58′32″ | 6.901±0.185 | Hexaploid |
| E47 | Danzhou,Hannan | 19.6 | 19°43′06″ | 109°26′34″ | 7.148±0.183 | Hexaploid |
| E48 | Shuanghua,Sichuan | 890.0 | 30°38′48″ | 104°01′18″ | 7.095±0.057 | Hexaploid |
| E49 | Suangliu,Sichuan | 550.0 | 30°24′30″ | 103°54′00″ | 6.981±0.086 | Hexaploid |
| E50 | Jiajiang,Sichuan | 426.0 | 29°47′19″ | 103°41′19″ | 4.800±0.185 | Tetraploid |
| E51 | Leshan,Sichuan | 362.0 | 29°35′46″ | 103°46′09″ | 7.944±0.503 | Hexaploid |
| E52 | Meishan,Sichuan | 408.0 | 30°21′04″ | 103°50′46″ | 7.896±0.036 | Hexaploid |
| E53 | Longquan,Sichuan | 800.0 | 30°33′10″ | 104°19′34″ | 7.901±0.202 | Hexaploid |
| E54 | Yaan,Sichuan | 584.0 | 29°58′55″ | 102°16′55″ | 6.965±0.156 | Hexaploid |
| E55 | Doujiangyan,Sichuan | 700.0 | 31°02′09″ | 103°46′10″ | 7.222±0.096 | Hexaploid |
| E56 | Xinjin,Sichuan | 460.0 | 30°25′28″ | 103°48′20″ | 8.391±0.104 | Hexaploid |
| E57 | Wenjiang,Sichuan | 600.0 | 30°42′36″ | 103°46′30″ | 8.050±0.249 | Hexaploid |
| E58 | Suining,Sichuan | 419.0 | 30°01′38″ | 105°32′29″ | 8.221±0.224 | Hexaploid |
| E59 | Jinjiangtang,Sichuan | 625.0 | 30°40′51″ | 104°29′58″ | 8.162±0.106 | Hexaploid |
Cluster analysis on plant biological characteristics
Collection sites were used as variables in the cluster analysis. Based on the 12 traits of the 55 accessions (Fig 2), the between-groups linkage method was applied, and the results revealed that the 55 copies of E. arundinaceus from different provenances could be divided into 46 primary groups at a distance of 0.833 as a standard point. The clustering results revealed that the plants could be divided into six groups with a distance of 10.417 as a standard point. Of the 25 accessions in the first group, all were hexaploids, including nine accessions from Guangxi province, six from Hainan province, five from Sichuan province, three from Guizhou province and one each from Yunnan and Guangdong provinces. There were 25 accessions in the second group, two of which were tetraploid, including 14 accessions from Sichuan province, three from Hannan province, three from Guizhou province, a total of three from Yunnan and Guangxi provinces, and the last two from Shanxi and Guangdong provinces. The hexaploid accessions from Hannan, Guizhou and Guangdong provinces were considered as the third, fourth and fifth groups, respectively. The tetraploid accessions from Guangdong and Sichuan provinces were considered as the sixth group.
Fig 2. The tree diagram of cluster analysis based on plant traits.
Correlation between ploidy level and DNA content and agronomic traits
All agronomic traits exhibited continuous variation, which is typical of quantitative or polygenic inheritance. Plant height exhibited the largest variation. The second highest variation was noted in leaf length and tiller, and minimum variation was in the water rate (S3 Dataset). Specifically, the leaf width, tiller and stem diameter of hexaploids were approximately 1.5 times greater than noted in tetraploids, the other traits were 1.5 times lower, In addition the water rate of hexaploids was similar with tetraploids (Table 2). Moreover, the correlations between agronomic traits in the flowering stage and the ploidy level and DNA content were analyzed. The results revealed that the ploidy level was positively and significantly correlated (P<0.01) with plant height, stem diameter and leaf width, with correlation coefficients of 0.417, 0.493, and 0.404, respectively. The results also revealed that DNA content was positively and significantly correlated (P<0.01) with plant height and stem diameter, with correlation coefficients of 0.378 and 0.418, respectively. The ploidy level was also positively correlated (P<0.05) with leaf width, with a correlation coefficient of 0.312 (Table 2).
Table 2. The mean agronomic traits of tetraploid and hexaploid, their correlation with ploidy level and 2C DNA content in E. arundinaceus.
| Traits | Tetraploid mean | Hexaploid mean | Ploidy | 2C DNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height, cm | 336.575±52.717 | 438.535±7.659 | 0.417** | 0.378** |
| Stem diameter, cm | 4.025±0.492 | 5.869±0.120 | 0.493** | 0.418** |
| Leaf length, cm | 158.200±15.832 | 177.676±2.973 | 0.228NS† | 0.118NS |
| Leaf width, cm | 2.125±0.423 | 3.494±0.115 | 0.404** | 0.312* |
| Tiller number | 67.000±18.000 | 104.000±7.000 | 0.183NS | 0.109NS |
| SFW, kg | 11.350±4.424 | 31.494±2.075 | 0.344* | 0.226NS |
| SDW, kg | 4.975±2.137 | 12.586±0.862 | 0.315* | 0.191NS |
| Water rate, % | 61.2±4.3 | 59.1±0.8 | 0.084NS | 0.076NS |
Note: SFW stand for fresh weight, SDW stand for dry weight,
†Non-significant at the 0.05 probability level,
**Significant at the 0.01 probability level,
*Significant at the 0.05 probability level.
Correlation between ploidy level and DNA content and physiological traits
All physiological traits also exhibited a certain range of variation with different ploidy levels. Based on the results, hemicellulose content exhibited the largest variation. The second highest variation was noted in lignin content and cellulose content, and the least variation was in ash (S4 Dataset). The results indicate that except for hemicellulose content, hexaploid genotypes exhibited significantly reduced cellulose and lignin content compared with tetraploids, whereas ash contents were similar. However, in contrast to the agronomic traits, no multiple relationship was noted between hexaploid and tetraploid genotypes in terms of physiological traits (Table 3). In addition, the correlations between ploidy level and DNA content and physiological traits revealed that the ploidy level was positively and significantly correlated (P<0.01) with hemicellulose content, which was inversely correlated with cellulose content, and the correlation coefficients were 0.394 and 0.373, respectively. Moreover, the ploidy level exhibited no significant correlation with lignin content or ash content (Table 3). The results also revealed a negative relationship (P<0.05) between cellulose content and DNA content. In contrast, the hemicellulose content was positively correlated (P<0.05) with DNA content. These correlation coefficients were 0.275 and 0.327, respectively. No correlations were observed with other traits (Table 3).
Table 3. The mean physiological traits of tetraploid and hexaploid, their correlation with ploidy level and 2C DNA content in E. arundinaceus.
| Traits | Tetraploid mean | Hexaploid mean | Ploidy | 2C DNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose, % | 41.408±0.648 | 38.867±0.222 | -0.394** | -0.275** |
| Hemicellulose, % | 26.539±0.826 | 29.127±0.239 | 0.373** | 0.327** |
| Lignin, % | 12.574±1.059 | 11.311±0.207 | -0.214NS† | -0.076NS |
| Ash, % | 5.420±0.511 | 5.415±0.123 | -0.002NS | -0.087NS |
Note:
†Non-significant at the 0.05 probability level,
**Significant at the 0.01 probability level.
ANOVA analysis for comparing accessions of different ploidy based on agronomic, physiological traits and DNA content
In this study ANOVA analysis was use to compare ploidy level (tetraploid and hexaploid) based on agronomic, physiological traits and DNA content, and also was used to compare the ploidy tetraploid and hexaploid accessions of each agronomic, physiological trait and DNA content, respectively (Table 4). The difference of plant heigh, stem diameter, leaf width, cellulose, hemicellulose and DNA content between tetraploid and hexaploid were significant, and other traits were not significant. In 4 accessions of tetraploid, the difference of traits were significant except the water rate and DNA content. In 51 accessions of hexaploid, the difference of all traits were significant.
Table 4. ANOVA analysis for comparing ploidy level (tetraploid and hexaploid), accessions of tetraploid, and accessions of hexaploid based on agronomic, physiological traits and DNA content, respectively.
| Traits | Plant height cm | Stem diameter cm | Leaf length cm | Leaf width cm | Tiller number | Water rate % | Cellulose% | Hemicellulose % | Lignin % | Ash % | DNA content % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ploidy | 11.17** | 16.43*** | 2.92NS† | 10.05** | 1.84NS | 0.37NS | 9.73** | 8.59** | 2.55NS | 0.00NS | 167.04**** |
| Accessions (tetraploid) | 160.86**** | 49.03**** | 22.33**** | 50.77**** | 32.18**** | 2.34NS | 6.54* | 12.56** | 40.86**** | 10.88** | 0.59NS† |
| Accessions (hexaploid) | 17.39**** | 13.86**** | 10.46**** | 26.16**** | 46.76**** | 4.82NS | 3.22**** | 1.87** | 10.31**** | 17.69**** | 6.74**** |
Note:
†Non-significant at the 0.05 probability level;
*Significant at the 0.05 probability level;
**Significant at the 0.01 probability level;
***Significant at the 0.001 probability level;
****Significant at the 0.0001 probability level.
Discussion
E. arundinaceus ploidy level and DNA content
This study is the first to determine the ploidy and DNA content levels of E. arundinaceus by flow cytometry. The use of flow cytometry saved time and resources. The protocol developed in this research could be used as a reference for researching E. arundinaceus by flow cytometry in future work. First, based on the complexity of plant cell nuclei, an appropriate buffer was critical for obtaining an ideal nuclear suspension. Second, the sampling of new leaves from young canes was important because older leaves can produce fewer intact nuclei, resulting in reduced fluorescence. Third, the double blade should be kept sharp to reduce mechanical damage to the nuclei.
Because the G1 peak of Sorghum was close to the peaks of E. arundinaceus, but not overlapping, Sorghum was selected from the list of plants recommended as excellent DNA content standards [33]. This choice is also reasonable for consistency with previous research examining the DNA content in gramineous plants (Fig 2). Both the internal and external standard methods were used to determine ploidy level. The results indicate that the fluorescence peak measured by the internal standard method was more accurate. This result may be because the two types of plant simultaneously underwent dissociation and staining in the internal standard method, which substantially reduced the artificial error. Therefore, the internal standard method is recommended for the determination of E. arundinaceus ploidy levels. It is also worth mentioning that leaves were used as the experimental materials and may exhibit endogenous polyploidy. However, the cause of endogenous polyploidy and its biological function require further research.
Only four tetraploids were identified among 55 accessions (Table 1), indicating that most E. arundinaceus is hexaploid in nature. The results were similar to the previous reports. [14, 34, 35]. Although only 7.2% of the selected accessions were tetraploid, their presence could complicate research results when choosing and using natural populations as well as providing important information for the breeding of sugarcane.The gene controlling biomass related traits like stem diameter and plant height of tetraploid E. arundinaceus could be much easier to transferred into sugarcane than hexaploid E. arundinaceus for its relative smaller genomes.
In this study, all agronomic and physiological traits of tetraploids E. arundinaceus got from 4 tetraploids E. arundinaceus accessions, the number of accessions was much less than hexaploid E. arundinaceus accessions, and unfortunately, it is very difficult for us to get more wild tetraploids E. arundinaceus accessions. To evaluate whether 4 tetraploids E. arundinaceus accessions were sufficient to capture the potential variability, the ANOVA analysis for comparing 4 accessions of tetraploid was studied, the difference of traits were significant except the water rate and DNA content, so 4 tetraploid accessions cloud capture a certain potential variability, but for capturing enough potential variability, it is necessary to collect more hexaploid E. arundinaceus accessions.
The mean DNA content of the tetraploids and the hexaploids was 4.82 and 7.30 pg, respectively. However, it is worth mentioning that the use of different sampling procedures and internal standards might cause slight differences between individual studies. The DNA content of the hexaploids was not exactly 1.5-fold increased compared with the tetraploids. Wang et al. [36] found similar results in 200 perennial ryegrasses, where the DNA content of tetraploids was not exactly two-fold increased compared with diploids. Genome differences among species could be the reason for this phenomenon. The grasses from Sichuan province exhibited the largest variation in DNA content, whereas grasses from Guangdong province exhibited the smallest variation. The large sample size might contribute to the relatively large variation in DNA content in the samples. Above all, although the study is helpful for sugarcane breeding, E. arundinaceus trait marker analysis, cultivar improvement, genome sequencing, genomic library construction and genomics research, the measurement of larger sample sizes is recommended to provide a genomic background for further E. arundinaceus breeding programs.
Cluster analysis of plant traits
Different E. arundinaceus resources were applied to cluster analysis, which could provide an important basis for the study of genetic differences among cultivars and the parental selection of cross breeding. It is feasible to use the method of clustering analysis because the basic data were obtained from seven provinces, thus ensuring genotype differences. The results of cluster analysis were intuitive and objective [3, 4]. In this study, 55 accessions were polymerized depending on 12 traits. Unlike most reports [10], these results indicate that the groups did not correspond simply to each collection site; however, certain regionalisms still existed. Although a certain correlation was noted between the characteristics of different accessions and their attribution, the differences were not identical, which may relate to differences in habitat conditions within the same province. Therefore, both the region and the characteristics should be considered when selecting parents.
The cluster analysis results revealed rich diversity in the genetic variation of the main characteristics of E. arundinaceus [10], which might contain important gene resources to be discovered for sugarcane breeding. According to the comprehensive comparison of the 12 main characteristics of the 55 materials, an important conclusion was also drawn that ideal parent materials could be chosen from the first group, whose stem diameter, plant height and cellulose content were better, because better stem diameter and plant height could help increase sugarcane yield, and more cellulose content could help the processing of sugarcane. However, parental selection should not be kept within the group because the germplasm resources of the group exhibited a smaller genetic distance between each other. In contrast, the germplasm resources belonging to the other groups exhibited greater differences.
Another trend in the evolution is also observed. Although the tetraploid and hexaploid materials were not simply and directly clustered into two categories, it was obvious that the results still revealed a certain polymerizability. Therefore, it was confirmed that the ploidy level was correlated with overall traits. Above all, the cluster analysis of E. arundinaceus between resistance and other important traits should be further studied.
Correlation between traits and ploidy level and DNA content
The main target of assessing the correlation between ploidy and traits was to quantify the impact of ploidy level. Kamemoto et al. [37] believed that polyploidy would show larger plant type, leaf and petal size. Sari et al. [38] found that the flowers of tetraploid watermelons were larger and more compact compared with diploids. Moreover, when the ploidy level changed from tetraploid to diploid, the size of flowers, pollen grains and fruit decreased. These results were consistent with the finding that the mean of each hexaploid E. arundinaceus trait was greater compared with tetraploid accessions. Another discovery of this study was that ploidy level was negatively correlated with cellulose content and positively correlated with plant height, stem diameter, leaf width, water rate and hemicellulose content. Therefore, if the breeding target of E. arundinaceus is a large plant, hexaploid varieties should be bred. If the breeding target is a plant with high cellulose content, tetraploid varieties should be choses.
Bonos et al. [39] found that only flag leaf length was positively correlated with DNA content in six Agrostis species, and no other morphological measurements were associated with DNA content. In addition, Wang et al. [36] reported that plant height was positively correlated with DNA content, but leaf width at the seedling stage in perennial ryegrass was not. Their research results were not analogous to ours. While agronomic factors are an important element in bioenergy crop production, physiological traits should also be considered [40]. One study indicated that the diploid perennial ryegrasses exhibited significantly increased natural detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) values compared with their tetraploid derivatives, whereas the situation was completely reversed for digestible organic matter (DOM) [41]. Some research has suggested that triploid and tetraploid genotypes exhibit significantly reduced lignin content compared with diploid genotypes at harvest, but cellulose content does not vary significantly with ploidy [42]. The data from these studies are also not consistent with ours. These results revealed that the degree of correlation in different plants was not completely consistent. In addition to the underlying genetic control, plant traits may be significantly impacted by environmental factors and plant growth habits, adding to the complexity of these highly polygenic traits and warranting further research.
It is worth mentioning that the results also indicate that not all individual characteristics of hexaploids were increased or decreased compared with tetraploid E. arundinaceus, suggesting that the identification of ploidy level solely through morphological measurements is not a reliably accurate method. In addition, the results of this study indicate that water rate was positively correlated (P<0.05) with the ploidy level but were not correlated with DNA content. Moreover, the correlation coefficients of traits and ploidy were not equal to the correlation coefficients of traits and DNA content, most likely due to differences among groups or the interspecific genetic basis of E. arundinaceus. These results regarding the relationship between ploidy and traits could provide further insight into yield and biomass quality improvements in E. arundinaceus. In addition, the correlations between ploidy level and DNA content and resistance to disease, pest, drought, flood and barrenness need to be studied.
In summary, flow cytometry can be used to determine ploidy level and DNA content in E. arundinaceus. The ploidy levels of 55 Chinese E. arundinaceus accessions were successfully identified using flow cytometry. Among them, four tetraploids and 55 hexaploids were identified. The average DNA content was 4.82 pg/2C for the tetraploids and 7.30 pg/2C for the hexaploids. On one hand, the results of the cluster analysis indicated that ploidy level was correlated with its overall traits. On the other hand, the specific correlation analysis found that the ploidy level was negatively correlated with cellulose content and positively correlated with plant height, stem diameter, leaf width and hemicellulose content. Determining E. arundinaceus’ ploidy level is conductive to establishing the population structure necessary for marker trait association analysis and natural tetraploid mapping populations to analyze genetic diversity. In addition, the four tetraploid accessions may also be potential resources for the cultivar improvement and breeding of sugarcane.
Supporting Information
(XLS)
(XLS)
(XLS)
(XLS)
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#31302026), National High-Tech R&D Program of China (863 Program, #2012AA101801-01), and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (#CARS35-35). SQ Bai received the funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Mukherjee SK. Origin and distribution of Saccharum. Bot Gaz. 1957;119: 55–56. 10.1086/335962 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nagai C. Somaclonal varieties of an intergeneric hybrid: Saccharum×Ripidum. Experiment Station of Hawaii Sugarcane Planter’s Association; 1983. pp. 9–10. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sreenivasan TV. Sugarcane genetic resources activities in India and in vitro germplasm conversation. Coimbatore, India: Sugarcane Breeding Institute; 1989. pp. 177–194. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ming R, Moore PH, Wu KK, D'Hont A, Glaszmann JC. Tew TL, et al. Sugarcane improvement through breeding and biotechnology. Plant Breed Rev. 2006;27: 15–118. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kole C, editor. Wild Crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources: Industrial crops. Heidelburg: Springer; 2011: pp. 97–109. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cai Q, Aitken KS, Fan YH, Piperidis G, Jackson P, McIntyre CL. A preliminary assessment of the genetic relationship between Erianthus rockii and the "Saccharum complex" using microsatellite (SSR) and AFLP markers. Plant Science. 2005;169: 976–984. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.07.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Piperidis N, Chen JW, Deng HH, Wang LP, Jackson P, Piperdis G. GISH characterization of Erianthus arundinaceus chromosomes in three generations of sugarcane intergeneric hybrids. Genome. 2010;53: 331–336. 10.1139/G10-010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tew TL, Cobill RM. Genetic improvement of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) as an energy crop In: Vermerris W, editor. Genetic improvement of bioenergy crops. New York: Springer; 2008. pp. 273–294. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Uwatoko N, Tanaka M, Saito A, Gau M. Establishment of plant regeneration system in Erianthus arundinaceus (Retz.) Jeswiet, a potential biomass crop. Grassland Sci. 2011;57: 231–237. 10.1111/j.1744-697X.2011.00234.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liang ZX. The genetic diversity and biomass evaluation of Erianthus arundinaceus germplasm. Sichuan Agricultural University; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu JJ,Peng HH, Zhao XJ, Cheng C, Chen F, Shao QJ. Optimization of liquid ammonia treatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of Saccharum arundinaceum to fermentable sugars. Chin J Biotechnol. 2013;29: 333–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barker RE, Kilgore JA, Cook RL, Garay AE, Warnke SE. Use of flow cytometry to determine ploidy level of ryegrass. Seed Sci Technol. 2001;29: 493–502. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Richardson MD, Hignight KW, Walker RH, Rodgers CA, Rush D, McCalla JH, et al. Meadow fescue and tetraploid perennial ryegrass—two new species for over-seeding dormant bermudagrass turf. Crop Sci. 2007;47: 83–90. 10.2135/cropsci2006.04.0221 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cai Q, Wen JC, Fan Y, Wang L, Ma L. Chromosome analysis of Saccharum L. and related plants. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2002;15: 16–19. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nair NV, Praneetha M. Cyto-morphological studies on three Erianthus arundinaceus (Retz.) Jeswiet accessions from the Andaman-Nicobar Islands, India. Cytologia. 2006;71: 107–109. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xiao FH. The comparative study of several kinds of Saccharum spp. and Erianthus arundinaceus with morphological and isozyme. Sugarcane. 1994;1: 22–26. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dolezel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry A. 2003;51: 127–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sreenivasan TV. Sugarcane genetic resources activities in India and in vitro germplasm conversation. Sugarcane Varietal Improvement Sugarcane Breeding Institute Coimbatore; 1989;194. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Leitch IJ, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennett MD. Evolution of DNA amounts across land plants (Embryophytaz). Ann Bot. 2005;95: 207–217. 10.1093/aob/mci014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Greilhuber J, Borsch T, Müller K, Worberg A, Porembski S, Barthlott W. Smallest angiosperm genomes found in Lentibulariaceae, with chromosomes of bacterial size. Plant Biol. 2006;8: 770–777. 10.1055/s-2006-924101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Deng GT, Liu QB, Jiang JX, Chen ZY, Ai X, Xiao L, et al. Estimation of genome size of miscanthus floridulus. Journal Plant Genetic Resources, 2013;2: 026 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lackey JA. Chromosome numbers in the Phaseoleae (Fabaceae: Faboideae) and their relation to taxonomy. Am J Bot. 1980;67: 595–602. 10.2307/2442301 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weedin JF, Powell AM. Chromosome numbers in chihuahuan desert cactaceae. Trans-Pecos Texas. Am J Bot. 1978;65: 531–537. 10.2307/2442586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zlesak DC, Thill CA, Anderson NO. Trifluralin-mediated polyploidization of Rosa chinensis minima (Sims) Voss seedlings. Euphytica. 2005;141: 281–290. 10.1007/s10681-005-7512-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li H, Yan B, Zhang T, Jiang YL, Zhang H, Yu LX, et al. Preliminary studies on polyploidy mutation of cut flower gerbera jamesonii bolus. Sinica Acta Horticulturae Sinica. 2009;36: 605–610. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Peterson DG, Schulze SR, Sciara EB. Integration of cot analysis, DNA cloning, and high-throughput sequencing facilitates genome characterization and gene discovery. Genome Res. 2002;12: 795–807. 10.1101/gr.226102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu YQ, Taliaferro CM, Bai GH, Martin DL, Anderson JA, Anderson MP, et al. Genetic analyses of Chinese Cynodon accessions by flow cytometry and AFLP markers. Crop Sci. 2006;46: 917–926. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, et al. The sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature. 2009;457: 551–556. 10.1038/nature07723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Deng Z, Zhang M, Lin W, Cheng F, Zhang C, Li Y, et al. Analysis of disequilibrium hybridization in hybrid and backcross progenies of Saccharum officinarum×Erianthus arundinaceus. Agric Sci China. 2010;9: 1271–1277. 10.1016/S1671-2927(09)60216-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wu JY, Huang Y, Lin Y, Fu C, Liu S, Deng Z, et al. Unexpected inheritance pattern of Erianthus arundinaceus chromosomes in the intergeneric progeny between Saccharum spp. and Erianthus arundinaceus. PLoS One. 2014;9: e110390 10.1371/journal.pone.0110390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1991;9: 229–241. 10.1007/BF02672073 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2007;2: 2233–2244. 10.1038/nprot.2007.310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Johnston JS, Bennett MD, Rayburn AL, Galbraith DW, Price HJ.Reference standards for determination of DNA content of plant nuclei. Am J Bot. 1999;86: 609–613. 10.2307/2656569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang QH, Li FS, Xiao FH, He SC. Studies on the chromosomes and botanical characters of Erianthus arundinaceum (Retz.) Jeswiet . Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University. 1997,12: 253–256. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Berding N, Koike H. Germplasm conservation of the Saccharum complex: A collection from the Indonesian Archipelago. Hawaiian Planters Record. 1980;59: 87–178. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang Y, Bigelow CA, Jiang YW. Ploidy Level and DNA content of perennial ryegrass Germplasm as determined by flow cytometry. Hort Sci. 2009;44: 2049–2052. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kamemoto H, Shindo K, Kosoki K. Chromosome homology in the Ceratobium, Phalaenanthe, and Latourea sections of the genus dendrobium. Pac Sci. 1964;18: 104–115. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sari N, Abak K, Pitrat M. Comparison of ploidy level screening methods in watermelon: Citrullus lanatus(Thunb.) Matsum and Nakai . Scientica Horticulturae. 1999;82: 265–277. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bonos SA, Plumley KA, Meyer WA. Ploidy determination in Agrostis using flow cytometry and morphological traits. Crop Sci. 2002;42: 192–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Denis M, Favreau B, Ueno S, Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Chaix G, Gion J et al. Genetic variation of wood chemical traits and association with underlying genes in eucalyptus urophylla. Tree Genet Genomes. 2013;9: 927–942. 10.1007/s11295-013-0606-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Salama H, Lösche M, Hermann A, Gierus M, Taube F. Effect of genotype and ploidy levels on the digestibility and fibre fractions of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) In: Nährwert und Milchproduktionspotential des Futters von Grünland: pp. 148–151. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Serapiglia MJ, Gouker FE, Hart JF, Unda F, Mansfield SD, Stipanovic AJ, et al. Ploidy Level affects important biomass traits of novel shrub Willow (Salix) hybrids. Bioenerg Res. 2015;8: 259–269. 10.1007/s12155-014-9521-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(XLS)
(XLS)
(XLS)
(XLS)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


