Abstract
Turicibacter bacteria are commonly detected in the gastrointestinal tracts and feces of humans and animals, but their phylogeny, ecological role, and pathogenic potential remain unclear. We present here the first complete genome sequence of Turicibacter sp. strain H121, which was isolated from the feces of a mouse line contaminated following germ-free derivation.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Members of the bacterial genus Turicibacter have been cultured or detected by PCR analysis, primarily from a variety of animal hosts or their waste (e.g., reference 1). However, only two isolates have been described thus far: the type strain Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361 (2), and the facultatively anaerobic methanol wastewater strain ZCY83 (3). Both isolates were observed to be Gram-positive non-spore-forming irregularly shaped rods. The phylogenetic position of Turicibacter has been uncertain; the 16S rRNA gene sequence of MOL361 might place it within the phylum Firmicutes, but not deeper with any degree of confidence (2). Later analyses placed Turicibacter in the class Bacilli (4), and then tentatively in the class Erysipelotrichia (5). The draft genomes of two undescribed Turicibacter strains were previously sequenced, those of PC909 (6) and HGF1 (GenBank accession no. NZ_AEXQ00000000.1).
Turicibacter sp. strain H121 was isolated following a germ-free derivation attempt of an R161H-TCR transgenic mouse line (7) at Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY). Two weeks after germ-free pups were born, contamination by a Gram-positive microbe was detected. Fecal samples from these pups were frozen until reconstituted in germ-free C57BL/6 mice to enrich for viable bacteria. From the feces of these mice, strain H121 was isolated anaerobically on Eggerth-Gagnon plates. The strain also grew on brain heart infusion (BHI) (Fluka) plates at 37°C under anaerobic, but not aerobic, conditions. However, inoculation into BHI, thioglycolate, or chopped meat carbohydrate broths resulted in no detectable growth after 4 weeks under anaerobic conditions at 37°C. Unlike strain MOL361, H121 survived freezing at -80°C in BHI or thioglycolate broth plus 15% glycerol but only survived lyophilization when in 10% skim milk.
High-molecular-weight DNA was extracted from colonies that were grown for 1 week on BHI plates, precipitated with sodium chloride and ethanol (8), and sequenced using the Pacific Biosciences RS II platform, according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Reads were fed into the Celera assembler and annotated using the NCBI tools Glimmer and GeneMark (9, 10).
The complete circular genome sequence of strain H121 comprised 2,622,031 bases, with 34.8% GC content and an average reference coverage of 74. The postfilter read N50 is 15,432 bases, with a quality value of 0.84. Annotation features include 2,486 genes, 94 pseudogenes, 12 16S rRNAs, 11 23S rRNAs, 13 5S rRNAs, 140 tRNAs, and 60 sporulation genes but no genes for flagella or pili. Of the 12 16S rRNA gene copies, 10 copies were identical across 1,509 nucleotides (nt), and the other 2 copies had a single-nucleotide insertion or substitution. The 10-copy 16S rRNA gene sequence was 99.2% identical to MOL361 and PC909, and 97.7% to ZCY83 (all single copies reported). There is no 16S rRNA gene among the HGF1 draft genome sequence. Phylogeny was inferred using an alignment of select amino acids from up to 400 genes with a database of 3,771 other organisms (11). Turicibacter sp. H121 was placed adjacent to the clade containing PC909 and HGF1, and together, they grouped with the halophilic anaerobe Haloplasma contractile at the base of the class Bacilli (12).
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The sequence of Turicibacter sp. H121 has been deposited in NCBI GenBank accession no. CP013476.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Katsuko Sudo and Japan SLC, Inc. for supporting work with gnotobiotic reconstitution and isolation of bacteria.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH), NEI intramural funding (EY000184).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Footnotes
Citation Auchtung TA, Holder ME, Gesell JR, Ajami NJ, Duarte RTD, Itoh K, Caspi RR, Petrosino JF, Horai R, Zárate-Bladés CR. 2016. Complete genome sequence of Turicibacter sp. strain H121, isolated from the feces of a contaminated germ-free mouse. Genome Announc 4(2):e00114-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00114-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Schubert AM, Sinani H, Schloss PD. 2015. Antibiotic-induced alterations of the murine gut microbiota and subsequent effects on colonization resistance against Clostridium difficile. mBio 6(4):e00974-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00974-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bosshard PP, Zbinden R, Altwegg M. 2002. Turicibacter sanguinis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anaerobic, Gram-positive bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1263–1266. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-4-1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cao G, Zhang Y, Chen L, Liu J, Mao K, Li K, Zhou J. 2015. Production of a bioflocculant from methanol wastewater and its application in arsenite removal. Chemosphere 141:274–281. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. 2005. The revised road map to the manual, p 159–220. In Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JR, Garrity GM (ed), Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed, The Proteobacteria, part A, introductory essays. Springer Verlag, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bosshard PP. 2009. Genus VIII. Turicibacter Bosshard, Zbinden and Altwegg 2002, 1266VP, p 1314–1315. In De Vos P, Garrity GM, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer K, Whitman WB (ed), Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed. The Firmicutes. Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cuív PO, Klaassens ES, Durkin AS, Harkins DM, Foster L, McCorrison J, Torralba M, Nelson KE, Morrison M. 2011. Draft genome sequence of Turicibacter sanguinis PC909, isolated from human feces. J Bacteriol 193:1288–1289. doi: 10.1128/JB.01328-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Horai R, Zárate-Bladés CR, Dillenburg-Pilla P, Chen J, Kielczewski JL, Silver PB, Jittayasothorn Y, Chan CC, Yamane H, Honda K, Caspi RR. 2015. Microbiota-dependent activation of an autoreactive T cell receptor provokes autoimmunity in an immunologically privileged site. Immunity 43:343–353. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, vol 3, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lukashin AV, Borodovsky M. 1998. GeneMark.Hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res 26:1107–1115. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.4.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Segata N, Börnigen D, Morgan XC, Huttenhower C. 2013. PhyloPhlAn is a new method for improved phylogenetic and taxonomic placement of microbes. Nat Commun 4:2304. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Antunes A, Rainey FA, Wanner G, Taborda M, Pätzold J, Nobre MF, da Costa MS, Huber R. 2008. A new lineage of halophilic, wall-less, contractile bacteria from a brine-filled deep of the Red Sea. J Bacteriol 190:3580–3587. doi: 10.1128/JB.01860-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]