Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 9;7(1):729–744. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6327

Table 2. Comparison of clinical characteristics and immunohistochemical expression of HE4 and Integrin β5 in 92 cases of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Characteristics N Group P HE4 Integrin β5
Sensitive Resistant + ++ +++ P + ++ +++ P
Age group, n(%)
 ≤60 74 47(83.9) 27(75.0) 0.292 16 17 17 13 0.065 13 24 19 7 0.161
 >60 18 9(16.1) 9(25.0) 1 13 9 6 11 5 10 3
FIGO Stage, n(%)
 I-II 31 27(48.2) 4(11.1) <0.001* 10 7 9 5 0.081 11 8 8 4 0.435
 III-IV 61 29(51.8) 32(88.9) 7 23 17 14 13 21 21 6
Differentiation, n(%)
 Well 14 10(17.9) 4(11.1) 0.318 5 2 4 3 0.435 4 3 5 2 0.866
 Moderate 43 28(50.0) 15(41.7) 8 15 13 7 12 12 15 4
 Poor 35 18(32.1) 17(47.2) 4 13 9 9 8 14 9 4
Pathological Subtype, n(%)
 Serous carcinoma 60 36(64.3) 24(66.7) 0.815 8 22 16 14 0.251 17 16 19 8 0.460
 Non-serous carcinoma 32 20(35.7) 12(33.3) 9 8 10 5 7 13 10 2
Lymph node metastasis, n(%)
 No 63 43(76.8) 20(55.6) 0.032* 14 21 17 11 0.449 19 18 18 8 0.393
 Yes 29 13(23.2) 16(44.4) 3 9 9 8 5 11 11 2
Residual tumor size, n(%)
 ≤1 cm 53 41(73.2) 12(33.3) <0.001* 14 15 16 8 0.072 17 17 16 3 0.178
 >1 cm 39 15(26.8) 24(66.7) 3 15 10 11 7 12 13 7
*

P < 0.05.

Chi-square test.