Abstract
Current treatments for African trypanosomiasis are either toxic, costly, difficult to administer, or prone to elicit resistance. This study evaluated the activity of bisnaphthalimidopropyl (BNIP) derivatives against Trypanosoma brucei. BNIPDiaminobutane (BNIPDabut), the most active of these compounds, showed in vitro inhibition in the single-unit nanomolar range, similar to the activity in the reference drug pentamidine, and presented low toxicity and adequate metabolic stability. Additionally, using a murine model of acute infection and live imaging, a significant decrease in parasite load in BNIPDabut-treated mice was observed. However, cure was not achieved. BNIPDabut constitutes a new scaffold for antitrypanosomal drugs that deserves further consideration.
TEXT
African trypanosomiasis is an infectious disease caused by parasites of the species Trypanosoma brucei. The parasite is transmitted by an insect vector, the tsetse fly (Glossina spp.). The disease is distributed mainly on the African continent, with distinct subspecies causing different forms of human disease. T. brucei gambiense produces a chronic form of infection that may last for years and was responsible for nearly 98% of trypanosomiasis cases in the past decade. The acute form is caused by T. brucei rhodesiense and usually kills the host within weeks, accounting for the remaining 2% of reported cases (1, 2).
Since vaccination remains elusive and vector control strategies are frequently insufficient, chemotherapy is still the most efficient option for controlling the disease (2–5). However, the drugs in current use have many drawbacks, mostly related to cost, effectiveness, toxicity, difficulty of administration, and appearance of resistance (6). Therefore, the development of new drugs is urgently needed.
Bisnaphthalimidopropyl (BNIP) derivatives have been shown to possess anticancer activity (7–11) and to have activity against a related trypanosomatid, Leishmania infantum (12–14). The potential activity of three BNIP derivatives previously synthetized (>96% pure [10, 11, 15]), namely, BNIPDiaminobutane (BNIPDabut), BNIPDiaminoheptane (BNIPDahep), and BNIPDiaminooctane (BNIPDaoct) (Fig. 1A), against T. brucei brucei Lister 427 bloodstream forms (BSFs), was investigated. These derivatives were selected from a series of compounds on the basis of preliminary studies of bioavailability and in vitro and in vivo activity against T. brucei and L. infantum (12; our unpublished data). The in vitro antiparasitic activity was assessed using a resazurin assay, as previously described, with minor modifications (incubation with 103 parasites/well, in 200 μl [16]). All three BNIPs demonstrated a potent inhibitory effect on parasite growth, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) within the nanomolar range (Fig. 1B; Table 1). BNIPDabut was the most active compound, with a mean IC50 (± standard deviation [SD]) of 2.4 ± 1.0 nM, similar to that of the reference drug pentamidine (mean IC50 [± SD], 2.9 ± 0.7 nM; Table 1). Since this class of compounds has been described as a group of inhibitors of the L. infantum Silent information regulator 2-related protein 1 (LiSir2rp1; GenBank accession number AAN39039.1) (15), we evaluated whether inhibition of the T. brucei orthologue TbSir2rp1 (GenBank accession number AAX70528.1) is a possible mechanism of action. Whereas BNIPDabut was shown to inhibit the NAD+-dependent deacetylase activity of TbSir2rp1 with an IC50 (± SD) of 155 ± 42 μM, suggesting that this is not the major mechanism of action (data not shown), LiSir2rp1 was inhibited with an IC50 (± SD) of 35.0 ± 5.8 μM (15). The 47% identity between LiSir2rp1 and TbSir2rp1 obtained by protein sequence alignment (Clone Manager 9, BLOSUM 62 scoring matrix) might explain the differences observed (17). Moreover, no correlation between the enzymatic inhibition and activity toward T. brucei parasites was observed. To evaluate in vitro toxicity toward mammalian cells, all the compounds were studied with the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide assay (18) in THP-1–derived macrophages and two primary cell cultures, rat cortical neurons and mouse hepatocytes (Table 2). The 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) values for these molecules translate into selectivity indexes (SIs) higher than 100 (SI = CC50/IC50). All the BNIP derivatives exhibited a high SI, with BNIPDabut in particular being at least 800 times more selective toward T. brucei parasites. All the BNIPs had potency and selectivity that warranted additional characterization (Table 2). To further evaluate the potential toxic effects of BNIPs in host cells, a set of in vitro assays was performed in hepatocytes and neuronal primary cells. These assays evaluated different possible mechanisms of toxicity based on (i) reactive oxygen species determination (chloromethyl-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate [CM-H2DCFDA] probe, by high content analysis [HCA]), (ii) mitochondrial dysfunction (tetramethylrhodamine, methyl ester [TMRM] probe, by HCA), (iii) membrane integrity (lactate dehydrogenase quantification), (iv) apoptosis (caspase 3/7 activation), (v) either DNA damage for hepatocytes (H2AX antibody, by HCA) or neurite outgrowth for neurons (anti-tubulin III antibody, by HCA), (vi) cell viability as measured by WST-8 [2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium sodium salt probe], and (vii) Hoechst staining for nuclear detection. Nimesulide (400 μM) was included as a positive control and the vehicle as a neutral control (19–21). The relative percent deviation from the neutral control was quantified and assigned with a number from 0 to 5 (0 [0% to 20% deviation], 1 [20% to 40%], 2 [40% to 60%], 3 [60% to 100%], 4 [100% to 1,000%], 5 [>1,000% deviation]). The sum of these values was ranked posteriorly to create combined injury criteria that varied from no injury (0) to low injury (1 to <5), moderate injury (≥5 to <12), and high injury (≥12). All BNIPs showed a dose-dependent injury score close to that of pentamidine in both cell types (Fig. 2A and B). BNIPDabut had a toxicity profile indistinguishable from that of the reference drug pentamidine.
FIG 1.
In vitro antitrypanosomal activity of BNIP compounds. (A) Chemical structures of pentamidine and the BNIP derivatives BNIPDabut, BNIPDahep, and BNIPDaoct. (B) Growth inhibition curves of Trypanosoma brucei brucei BSFs incubated in vitro with the indicated concentrations of pentamidine, BNIPDabut, BNIPDahep, or BNIPDaoct for 72 h. Parasite density was evaluated using resazurin. Dots and error bars represent the means + standard deviations of antiparasitic activity. Data are from 3 independent experiments.
TABLE 1.
In vitro activity of BNIP derivatives against Trypanosoma brucei brucei L427 bloodstream forms
| Compound | IC50 ± SD (nM) | IC90 ± SD (nM) |
|---|---|---|
| Pentamidine | 2.94 ± 0.74 | 5.26 ± 0.58 |
| BNIPDabut | 2.35 ± 0.99 | 3.83 ± 1.40 |
| BNIPDahep | 14.32 ± 1.21 | 23.07 ± 1.01 |
| BNIPDaoct | 26.15 ± 10.43 | 63.36 ± 21.19 |
TABLE 2.
In vitro cytotoxicity of BNIP derivatives in different cell types
| Compound | CC50 ± SD (μM) in: |
Selectivity index ina: |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THP-1b | Hepatocytes | Neurons | THP-1b | Hepatocytes | Neurons | |
| Pentamidine | 47.73 ± 3.32 | 18.21 ± 0.66 | 8.23 ± 0.88 | 16,259 | 6,203 | 2,803 |
| BNIPDabut | 5.90 ± 0.40 | 9.19 ± 0.06 | 2.06 ± 1.69 | 2,514 | 3,916 | 878 |
| BNIPDahep | 3.34 ± 0.11 | 4.23 ± 0.48 | 2.31 ± 1.65 | 233 | 295 | 161 |
| BNIPDaoct | 3.88 ± 0.59 | 18.35 ± 4.58 | 3.97 ± 1.30 | 148 | 702 | 152 |
Selectivity index = CC50 cell line/IC50 T. brucei.
THP-1 derived macrophages.
FIG 2.
In vitro toxicity of BNIP derivatives. (A) Hepatotoxicity injury score. The score was calculated as the sum of individual scores obtained from a panel of in vitro cytotoxicity assays that include (i) measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) using CM-H2DCFDA and cell imaging by HCA, (ii) assessment of mitochondrial dysfunction measured by TMRM probe dynamics in cells and imaged by HCA, (iii) membrane integrity assayed by lactate dehydrogenase quantification, (iv) DNA damage by imaging with H2AX antibody and HCA, (v) apoptosis by caspase 3/7 activation, (vi) Hoechst staining for nuclear detection, and (vii) cell viability by WST-8 probe. Nimesulide (400 μM), an approved drug with a mild toxicological profile, was included as a toxicity control. Individual scores were calculated on the basis of the relative percentage of deviation from the negative control quantified and assigned with a number from 0 to 5 (0 [0% to 20% deviation], 1 [20% to 40%], 2 [40% to 60%], 3 [60% to 100%], 4 [100% to 1,000%], or 5 [>1,000% deviation]). The data represent the mean sum of these values. (B) Neurotoxicity injury score. The score was calculated in a manner similar to that for the hepatotoxicity score, but instead of DNA damage by H2AX antibody, an assay to test neurite outgrowth as imaged with an anti-tubulin III antibody and HCA was performed. The data represent the mean sum of these values. Data are from 2 independent experiments.
To infer metabolic stability, mouse microsomes were incubated over 45 min with each compound at 5 μM, and each drug was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Similarly to pentamidine, BNIPDabut was more stable than BNIPDahep and BNIPDaoct; 95% to 100% of the drug was not metabolized (Table 3). This high metabolic stability is an indicator that the molecule is not easily subjected to common inactivation or loss of potency by reactions catalyzed by liver enzymes and is kept intact in circulation for longer periods.
TABLE 3.
Mouse microsomal stability
| Compound | Metabolic stability (%) | In vitro intrinsic clearance (μl/min/mg protein) | Degradation non-NADPH dependent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pentamidine | 95–100 | <5 | |
| BNIPDabut | 95–100 | <5 | |
| BNIPDahep | 85 | 7 | <5 |
| BNIPDaoct | 64 | 20 | 9 |
To determine the pharmacokinetics of BNIPDabut, a 10-mg/kg dose was administered to BALB/c mice by intravenous injection. Five minutes later, a concentration of 58 nM was achieved and, during the following 24 h, remained higher than 41 nM (data not shown); thus, the concentration was approximately eight times higher than the calculated IC90.
Taking into consideration the previous results, we chose BNIPDabut for in vivo efficacy studies. All the experiments involving animals were carried out in accordance with the Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology Animal Ethics Committees and the Portuguese and European Authorities for Animal Health guidelines. T. brucei brucei Lister 427 parasites were transfected with a construct kindly provided by M. Taylor, in which the red-shifted luciferase gene (PpyRE9h) is flanked by 5′VSG/3′tubulin (22). After transfection, clones were screened for bioluminescent signal, and the ones that expressed the highest levels were selected. Their in vitro growth was compared with that of wild-type parasites and was found to be similar (data not shown). In vitro detection limits were also analyzed for BSFs in a 96-well plate and determined to be approximately 2,500 cells (data not shown). Female BALB/c mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 104 BSFs. Three days after infection, five groups of mice (n = 4 per group) were treated intravenously with (i) saline, (ii) pentamidine at 2.5 mg/kg/day, (iii) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 16.7%, or (iv) BNIPDabut at a dose of 10 or 20 mg/kg/day. Pentamidine was administered for 4 days, while BNIPDabut and the respective vehicle (DMSO at 16.7%) were administered for 6 days (Fig. 3A). No adverse effects were observable following any administration regimen. Treatment efficacy was followed through whole-animal live imaging using an IVIS Lumina LT (PerkinElmer). Parasitemia was also assessed, and animals were euthanized after reaching a parasite concentration of 108 parasites/ml. Similarly to pentamidine, two administrations of either 10 or 20 mg/kg BNIPDabut efficiently reduced parasitemia below the detection limit (5 × 104/ml) (Fig. 3B). However, whole-mouse imaging revealed that a reduction of bioluminescent signal to the background level (obtained with noninfected mice) was achieved only in mice treated with 20 mg/kg of BNIPDabut during at least 5 consecutive days, as opposed to 2 days of treatment for the pentamidine group. Although treatment with 20 mg/kg BNIPDabut apparently cleared the infection, cure was not achieved; the parasite burden relapsed when treatment was stopped (Fig. 3B). Indeed, BNIPDabut (10 and 20 mg/kg) treatment increased survival of the mice, but in contrast to those that received pentamidine, these animals were not cured (Fig. 3C). A hypothesis is that BNIPDabut, although highly trypanocidal, cannot reach and clear all parasites due to potency, distribution, or both. A frequent observation was that the recurrence of parasitemia was preceded by imaging of parasite loads in the peritoneal zone, where animals were originally injected with the parasites. It has been demonstrated that trypanosomes invade extravascular tissues as a defense mechanism against host immunity and that this process may be related to relapses after treatment interruption (23, 24). Indeed, the presence of parasites in the extravascular tissues might explain the discrepancy of radiance values between days 4 and 12, while average parasitemia levels remained similar in mice treated with BNIPDabut (10 or 20 mg/kg) (Fig. 3C). Nonetheless, it remains to be elucidated whether BNIPDabut is active in a mouse model of late-stage disease, as this is the central objective in drug discovery against human African trypanosomiasis. Additional chemical modifications to BNIPDabut may improve potency and/or distribution of the drug while maintaining or improving the toxicity and metabolism profiles.
FIG 3.
BNIPDabut in vivo efficacy against T. brucei brucei. (A) Schematic of the experimental design for evaluating the in vivo efficacy of BNIPDabut. (B) Mice were infected with 104 luciferase-positive BSFs by intraperitoneal injection, and the different treatments were initiated 3 days after infection. Whole-mouse bioluminescence imaging was done on days 3, 4, 9, and 12 using an IVIS Lumina LT and after injection of 2.1 mg luciferin. The bioluminescence average radiance (photons per seconds per square centimeter per steradian [p/sec/cm2/sr]) of whole mice was quantified, and the mean + standard deviation (n = 4) is shown by the bars. Parasitemia was determined with a hemocytometer, and the means + standard deviations are represented by red dots. Red X's represent the parasite concentration of the only animal in which parasites could be detected and quantified. The parasitemia detection limit was 5 × 104 parasites/ml. (C) Kaplan-Meyer survival curves of the infected mice treated with control and experimental doses of BNIPDabut. In panels B and C, the data are representative of 3 independent experiments.
In conclusion, this work demonstrates that BNIPDabut has potent in vitro and in vivo antitrypanosomal activity with acceptable toxicity and high metabolic stability. However, chemical modifications are needed to improve its pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic properties.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Luciferase-expressing plasmid was kindly provided by Martin Taylor, who constructed it with the firefly luciferase gene variant PpyRE9h from the Bruce Branchini Laboratory.
REFERENCES
- 1.Franco JR, Simarro PP, Diarra A, Jannin JG. 2014. Epidemiology of human African trypanosomiasis. Clin Epidemiol 6:257–275. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S39728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Franco JR, Simarro PP, Diarra A, Ruiz-Postigo JA, Jannin JG. 2014. The journey towards elimination of gambiense human African trypanosomiasis: not far, nor easy. Parasitology 141:748–760. doi: 10.1017/S0031182013002102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Horn D. 2014. Antigenic variation in African trypanosomes. Mol Biochem Parasitol 195:123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Radwanska M, Guirnalda P, De Trez C, Ryffel B, Black S, Magez S. 2008. Trypanosomiasis-induced B cell apoptosis results in loss of protective anti-parasite antibody responses and abolishment of vaccine-induced memory responses. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000078. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schofield CJ, Kabayo JP. 2008. Trypanosomiasis vector control in Africa and Latin America. Parasit Vectors 1:24. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-1-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brun R, Blum J, Chappuis F, Burri C. 2010. Human African trypanosomiasis. Lancet 375:148–159. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60829-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ralton LD, Bestwick CS, Milne L, Duthie S, Kong Thoo Lin P. 2009. Bisnaphthalimidopropyl spermidine induces apoptosis within colon carcinoma cells. Chem Biol Interact 177:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Barron GA, Bermano G, Gordon A, Kong Thoo Lin P. 2010. Synthesis, cytotoxicity and DNA-binding of novel bisnaphthalimidopropyl derivatives in breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Eur J Med Chem 45:1430–1437. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.12.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bestwick CS, Ralton LD, Milne L, Kong Thoo Lin P, Duthie SJ. 2011. The influence of bisnaphthalimidopropyl polyamines on DNA instability and repair in Caco-2 colon epithelial cells. Cell Biol Toxicol 27:455–463. doi: 10.1007/s10565-011-9199-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oliveira J, Ralton L, Tavares J, Codeiro-da-Silva A, Bestwick CS, McPherson A, Thoo Lin PK. 2007. The synthesis and the in vitro cytotoxicity studies of bisnaphthalimidopropyl polyamine derivatives against colon cancer cells and parasite Leishmania infantum. Bioorg Med Chem 15:541–545. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dance AM, Ralton L, Fuller Z, Milne L, Duthie S, Bestwick CS, Lin PK. 2005. Synthesis and biological activities of bisnaphthalimido polyamines derivatives: cytotoxicity, DNA binding, DNA damage and drug localization in breast cancer MCF 7 cells. Biochem Pharmacol 69:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tavares J, Ouaissi A, Silva AM, Lin PK, Roy N, Cordeiro-da-Silva A. 2012. Anti-leishmanial activity of the bisnaphthalimidopropyl derivatives. Parasitol Int 61:360–363. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2011.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tavares J, Ouaissi A, Lin PK, Tomas A, Cordeiro-da-Silva A. 2005. Differential effects of polyamine derivative compounds against Leishmania infantum promastigotes and axenic amastigotes. Int J Parasitol 35:637–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Costa Lima S, Rodrigues V, Garrido J, Borges F, Kong Thoo Lin P, Cordeiro da Silva A. 2012. In vitro evaluation of bisnaphthalimidopropyl derivatives loaded into pegylated nanoparticles against Leishmania infantum protozoa. Int J Antimicrob Agents 39:424–430. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tavares J, Ouaissi A, Kong Thoo Lin P, Loureiro I, Kaur S, Roy N, Cordeiro-da-Silva A. 2010. Bisnaphthalimidopropyl derivatives as inhibitors of Leishmania SIR2 related protein 1. Chem Med Chem 5:140–147. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.200900367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bowling T, Mercer L, Don R, Jacobs R, Nare B. 2012. Application of a resazurin-based high-throughput screening assay for the identification and progression of new treatments for human African trypanosomiasis. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2:262–270. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2012.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Eddy SR. 2004. Where did the BLOSUM62 alignment score matrix come from? Nat Biotech 22:1035–1036. doi: 10.1038/nbt0804-1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van Meerloo J, Kaspers GL, Cloos J. 2011. Cell sensitivity assays: the MTT assay, p 237–245. In Cree IA. (ed), Cancer cell culture, vol 731 Humana Press, New York, NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mingatto FE, Rodrigues T, Pigoso AA, Uyemura SA, Curti C, Santos AC. 2002. The critical role of mitochondrial energetic impairment in the toxicity of nimesulide to hepatocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 303:601–607. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.038620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tripathi R, Tripathi P, Pancholi SS, Patel CN. 2014. The genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of nimesulide in the mouse bone marrow. Drug Chem Toxicol 37:255–260. doi: 10.3109/01480545.2013.838779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Borkotoky D, Panda SK, Sahoo GR, Parija SC. 2014. Genotoxicity of nimesulide in Wistar rats. Drug Chem Toxicol 37:178–183. doi: 10.3109/01480545.2013.834357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McLatchie AP, Burrell-Saward H, Myburgh E, Lewis MD, Ward TH, Mottram JC, Croft SL, Kelly JM, Taylor MC. 2013. Highly sensitive in vivo imaging of Trypanosoma brucei expressing “red-shifted” luciferase. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7:e2571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Whitelaw DD, Gardiner PR, Murray M. 1988. Extravascular foci of Trypanosoma vivax in goats: the central nervous system and aqueous humor of the eye as potential sources of relapse infections after chemotherapy. Parasitology 97:51–61. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000066737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Claes F, Vodnala SK, van Reet N, Boucher N, Lunden-Miguel H, Baltz T, Goddeeris BM, Buscher P, Rottenberg ME. 2009. Bioluminescent imaging of Trypanosoma brucei shows preferential testis dissemination which may hamper drug efficacy in sleeping sickness. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3:e486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



