Skip to main content
Journal of Lipid Research logoLink to Journal of Lipid Research
. 2016 Apr;57(4):538–545. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R063032

GPI-AP release in cellular, developmental, and reproductive biology

Yoshitaka Fujihara 1, Masahito Ikawa 1,1
PMCID: PMC4808780  PMID: 26593072

Abstract

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins (GPI-APs) contain a covalently linked GPI anchor located on outer cell membranes. GPI-APs are ubiquitously conserved from protozoa to vertebrates and are critical for physiological events such as development, immunity, and neurogenesis in vertebrates. Both membrane-anchored and soluble GPI-APs play a role in regulating their protein conformation and functional properties. Several pathways mediate the release of GPI-APs from the plasma membrane by vesiculation or cleavage. Phospholipases and putative substrate-specific GPI-AP-releasing enzymes, such as NOTUM, glycerophosphodiesterase 2, and angiotensin-converting enzyme, have been characterized in mammals. Here, the protein modifications resulting from the cleavage of the GPI anchor are discussed in the context of its physiological functions.

Keywords: genetics, gene expression, membranes, phospholipases, phospholipids/phosphatidylinositol, glypican, GPIase, IZUMO1 receptor/JUNO, reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with kazal motifs, testis-expressed gene 101, glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein


Eukaryotic organisms produce many membrane proteins that are anchored to the outer cell membrane by glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI). GPI-anchored proteins (GPI-APs) have unique structures that contain mannose, glucosamine, ethanolamine, and phosphatidylinositol (1). Although they have similar core backbone structures, GPI-APs are a functionally diverse family of molecules that includes hydrolytic enzymes, adhesion molecules, receptors, protease inhibitors, and complement regulatory proteins (2). GPI-APs are released from the cell surface by bacterial phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) (3). In mammals, GPI-APs are released and taken up by both vesiculation-mediated and non-vesiculation-mediated mechanisms (4). Several putative substrate-specific enzymes release GPI-APs from the cell surface (58). Thus, GPI-anchor release may be required for different biological functions and regulatory mechanisms. In this review, we will focus on the significance of GPI-AP release in cellular, developmental, and reproductive biology (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

GPI-APs and GPIase factors involved in cleavage of the GPI anchor from the cell surface

GPI-APs GPI-AP Releasing Factors Domain Responsible for GPIase Activity Phenotype of GPI-AP KO Mice References
PLUAR/uPAR GPLD1/GPI-PLD Catalytic domain Mild phenotype (18, 19)
CEACAM5/CEA GPLD1/GPI-PLD Catalytic domain Not determineda (25)
PRSS8/prostasin GPLD1/GPI-PLD Catalytic domain Embryonic lethality (29, 31)
TDGF1/CRIPTO-1 GPLD1/GPI-PLD Catalytic domain Embryonic lethality (37, 38)
GPC3 (glypicans) NOTUM Not determineda Postnatal lethality (44, 58)
RECK GDPD5/GDE2 GDPD domain Embryonic lethality (5, 67)
TEX101 ACE Not determineda Male infertility (6, 7)
IZUMO1R/JUNO Not determineda Not determineda Female infertility (104)
a

Has not been reported.

GPI-ANCHOR-RELEASING ENZYME, GPLD1/GPI-PLD, TARGETED FOR VARIOUS SUBSTRATES

A unique feature of GPI-APs is their cleavage by specific phospholipases, resulting in the release of the protein from the cell membrane. Among GPI-specific phospholipases, the only purified and characterized mammalian phospholipase is a GPI-specific phospholipase D (GPI-PLD), GPLD1, which is abundant in serum (911). GPLD1 is a soluble protein with two functional domains, an N-terminal catalytic domain and a predicted C-terminal β-propeller domain (12, 13). GPLD1 hydrolyzes GPI anchors that have acylated inositol, unlike GPI anchors cleaved by PI-PLC and GPI-PLC (3). The catalytic activity of mouse GPLD1 depends on histidines at positions 29, 125, 133, and 158 in the catalytic site (14). Membrane-bound GPI-AP is released from the cell surface by GPLD1 in several important cellular processes, including adhesion, differentiation, proliferation, survival, and oncogenesis. Although the physiological role of GPLD1 is unknown, GPLD1 substrates have been identified, and their roles have been investigated in gene KO mice (Table 1).

PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR UROKINASE RECEPTOR

Plasminogen activator urokinase receptor (PLAUR, also known as CD87 and uPAR) is a GPI-AP receptor that binds to plasminogen activator urokinase (PLAU, also known as uPA) (15). PLUAR was identified as a multifunctional cell-surface receptor that regulates cellular differentiation, proliferation, migration, adhesion, and invasion (15, 16). When bound to a PLAU, PLAUR functions as a signaling receptor that converts plasminogen into plasmin, which upon activation triggers an extracellular proteolysis cascade (17). PLAUR also interacts nonproteolytically with vitronectin, an interaction that induces the migration of various cell types. PLAUR activity is regulated by receptor shedding and cleavage. Receptor shedding is mediated by cleavage close to the GPI anchor by GPLD1 and several proteases (18), whereas receptor cleavages release the N-terminal ligand binding domain (D1) from the other domains (D2D3) (15). These modifications are independent, and the resulting forms of PLAUR have different biological activities. Although minor phenotypes were observed in Pluar KO mice, PLUAR was dispensable for development and fertility in mice (19).

CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN AND RELATED ADHESION MOLECULES

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), first described in 1965, is a highly glycosylated immunoglobulin-related protein whose serum level increases in some types of cancer (20, 21). CEA-related cell-adhesion molecules (CEACAMs) have been implicated in numerous physiological and pathological functions (22). In humans, there are three major CEACAMs on epithelial tissues: one transmembrane type (CEACAM1) and two GPI-anchored types (CEACAM5 and CEACAM6) (23). Because Ceacam1 KO mice have no gross abnormalities, epithelial CEACAMs seem to contribute to the fine-tuning of cellular events (24). CEACAMs may be more important under pathological conditions, as they are bound by various pathogens (22). CEACAM5 is released by GPLD1-mediated GPI-anchor cleavage (25); it is overexpressed in many cancers and is a widely used tumor biomarker (20, 21). The analysis of Ceacam5 KO mice has not been reported yet.

PRSS8/PROSTASIN

Protease serine (PRSS)8 (also known as prostasin) is a trypsin-like serine peptidase encoded by the PRSS8 gene. It was purified as a soluble enzyme from human seminal fluid and is highly expressed in kidney, lung, pancreas, and prostate in mice and humans (26, 27). As a GPI-AP, PRSS8 can be removed from the cell membrane by treatment with PI-PLC (28). Under physiological conditions, PRSS8 secretion from the membrane-bound form depends on GPI-anchor cleavage by endogenous GPLD1 in epithelial cells (29). PRSS8 and the type II transmembrane serine protease, matriptase/ST14, are generally recognized to interact with serine protease inhibitors (SPINT1 and SPINT2) and are indispensable for epithelial development and homeostasis (30). PRSS8 is required for terminal epidermal differentiation and postnatal survival in mice (31), but its enzymatic activity is not required for development and postnatal homeostasis (32). Thus, the nonenzymatic activity of PRSS8 is essential for in vivo development. The role of GPLD1-mediated release of PRSS8 in vivo has not been determined.

TERATOCARCINOMA-DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR 1

Teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor 1 (TDGF1) is a GPI-AP and a member of the epidermal growth factor-CFC (CRIPTO-1/FRL-1/cryptic) family. TDGF1 interacts with various components of multiple signal pathways to enhance stem cell renewal, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, proliferation, and oncogenesis (33). TDGF1 acts as both a ligand and coreceptor in the nodal signaling pathway that involves Smad 2, 3, and 4 (34, 35). GPI-anchored TDGF1 is required for paracrine activity as a nodal coreceptor (36). In its soluble form, TDGF1 functions as a ligand in tumor progression. Because the shedding of TDGF1 is mediated by GPLD1 activity at the GPI-anchor site, soluble TDGF1 may stimulate endothelial cell migration and tumor angiogenesis (37). TDGF1 is essential for embryogenesis and cellular transformation in mice (38), but the physiological functions regulated by the membrane-bound and soluble forms have not been determined (34).

NOTUM-MEDIATED GPI-ANCHOR CLEAVAGE IN DEVELOPMENT

Glypicans (GPCs) are heparin sulfate proteoglycans that are bound to the cell surface of the plasma membrane by a GPI anchor (39). Two GPCs, division abnormally delayed (DALLY) and Dally-like protein (DLP), have been identified in Drosophila (40, 41). The six GPC family proteins (GPC1–6) have been conserved in mice and humans (39, 4244). GPCs regulate signaling pathways triggered by Hedgehogs, Wnts, bone morphogenetic proteins, and fibroblast growth factors, and function in axon guidance and excitatory synapses (45). GPI-anchored GPCs interact directly with Wnt family proteins and can stimulate Wnt signaling by facilitating or stabilizing the interaction between Wnts and their receptors (4650). GPCs may also inhibit Wnt signaling (47). Moreover, in Drosophila, secreted GPCs have been reported to play a role in the transport of Wnts in the imaginal wing discs for regulation of morphogen gradient formation during development (5154).

NOTUM, a member of the α/β-hydrolase superfamily, regulates Wnt activity by modifying the heparin sulfate chains of GPCs, DALLY, and DLP (55). NOTUM was reported to induce shedding of DLP from the cell surface by cleaving its GPI anchor (8) (Table 1). However, the idea that NOTUM mediates release of GPCs was called into question by a report that recombinant Drosophila NOTUM cannot cleave DLP and instead functions as a carboxylesterase that removes an essential palmitoleate moiety from Wnt proteins (56). Xenopus NOTUM is also a Wnt deacylase and is required for brain development (57). Mammalian NOTUM was reported to cleave not only GPCs (GPC3, GPC5, and GPC6), but also other GPI-APs (PLAUR and T-cadherin) (58). Further study is needed to resolve questions about the function of NOTUM and its enzymatic activities.

GPI-ANCHOR CLEAVAGE OF RECK BY GLYCEROPHOSPHODIESTERASE 2 IN NEUROGENESIS

Glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterases (GDPDs) are periplasmic and cytosolic proteins that are critical for the hydrolysis of deacylated glycerophospholipids to glycerol phosphate and alcohol, which are then utilized as a major source of carbon and phosphate (59). Though GDPDs are highly conserved from bacteria to mammals, they differ in their enzymatic activities and biological functions. The mammalian glycerophosphodiesterases (GDEs) have substrate specificities that do not need glycerophosphodiester. Seven homologs (GDE1–7) are conserved in mice and humans. The physiological roles of the GDE family were recently reviewed (60).

GDE2 (also known as GDPD5) has six transmembrane domains and an extracellular GDPD domain (61). GDE2 is an osmoregulated enzyme (62) and a key regulator of motor neuron differentiation (63). GDE2 is expressed in undifferentiated progenitors, but not in mature motor neurons, and its GDPD activity induces non-cell-autonomous motor neuron generation by inhibiting Notch signaling (64). Though the mechanism used by GDE2 to inhibit Notch signaling cannot be explained by conventional GDPD activity, the GPI-AP-releasing (GPIase) activity of GDE2 promotes this process during neural differentiation (5).

Reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with kazal motifs (RECK) is a GPI-AP that activates Notch signaling in cortical progenitors by directly inhibiting ADAM10, a disintegrin, and metallopeptidase 10, which removes the Notch ligand Delta-like 1 (DLL1) (6567). GDE2’s GPIase activity is derived from the GDPD activity domain, which sheds the GPI anchor of RECK in a manner different from that of GPI-PLD (5) (Table 1). Thus, GDE2-mediated RECK release controls the timing of Dll1-Notch signal-mediated neurogenesis (Fig. 1). GDE3 and GDE6 may have similar GPIase activities (59). Their physiological functions remain to be determined in vivo.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

GDE2 GDPD activity-dependent cleavage of RECK during neurogenesis. A: RECK inhibits ADAM10-mediated DLL1 cleavage (65, 66). Dll1-Notch signaling maintains the undifferentiated state of neuronal progenitor cells. B: GDE2 with its GPIase activity residing in a GDPD domain releases RECK from the cell surface (5). C: The release of RECK enables ADAM10 to access and cleave DLL1 (107). The subsequent discontinuation of Notch signaling non-cell-autonomously induces neural differentiation of progenitor cells.

ROLE OF GPI-APS IN FERTILIZATION

Fertilization is a complicated multi-step event. In mammals, sperm ejaculated into the female reproductive tract must migrate through the utero-tubal junction to the ampulla, where fertilization takes place. Oocytes released from the ovary are surrounded by an extracellular matrix, the zona pellucida (ZP), and cumulus cell layers filled with hyaluronic acid. At the ampulla, spermatozoa must cross the cumulus cell layer, penetrate the ZP, interact with the oocyte membrane, and finally fuse with the egg. Experiments in KO mice have been undertaken to classify the various factors that are essential for fertilization (68, 69). GPI-APs and their removal play key roles during fertilization. Below, we will discuss the current understanding of the functions of GPI-APs in mammalian fertilization.

GPI-APs and sperm migration in the female reproductive tract

GPI-APs on the surface of spermatozoa originate primarily from de novo synthesis by spermatogenic cells and by transfer from epididymal luminal fluids, likely mediated by exosomes (70). Three surface-bound GPI-APs, CD52, CD55, and CD59, are thought to protect spermatozoa from immunological attack in the female reproductive tract (71). Removal of these GPI-APs was thought to regulate sperm capacitation, which readies sperm for the acrosome reaction (72). However, studies in KO mice showed that the fertilization ability of sperm does not require CD52, CD55, CD59a, and CD59b (7376). In spermatogenesis, CD59b has a critical role that is independent from complement regulatory function (74). Recently, Cd55b was identified in mice, but its physiological function remains to be determined.

During the migration of sperm through the female reproductive tract, the utero-tubal junction is a critical barrier. GPI-APs are directly or indirectly involved in this step. Post-GPI attachment to proteins 1 (PGAP1) is GPI inositol-deacylase that resides in the endoplasmic reticulum and contributes to the maturation of GPI-APs (77). Pgap1 KO mice have otocephaly and growth retardation, and often die right after birth. Males that survive to sexual maturity are severely subfertile, probably because they have three “footed” GPI anchors that are resistant to cleavage of sperm GPI-APs (78). The mutant spermatozoa are impaired in their ability to migrate from the uterus into the oviduct in vivo and bind to the ZP in vitro. The same phenotype has been reported in KO mice lacking a disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 3 (ADAM3), a cysteine-rich glycosylated sperm membrane protein (79, 80). However, the link between GPI-APs and ADAM3 has not been elucidated.

More than 10 molecules have been reported to be indispensable for ADAM3 maturation and the fertilizing ability of spermatozoa (68). Male mice lacking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), a zinc peptidase that regulates blood pressure (81), were subfertile and had low blood pressure because of the lack of somatic and testicular ACE isoforms (82, 83). Ace KO spermatozoa were deficient in their ability to migrate into the oviduct and bind ZP in vitro, leading to the aberrant distribution of ADAM3 (84). Using sperm-adhesion molecule 1 (SPAM1/PH20) and PRSS21 (PRSS21/TESP5) as substrates, ACE also has GPIase activity in spermatozoa (7); however, the GPIase activity was mild and was not confirmed by other groups (85, 86).

Testis-expressed gene 101 (TEX101) and the TEX101-interacting protein, lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus K (LY6K), are germ-cell-specific GPI-APs found in the testis, but not on epididymal spermatozoa (87, 88). The GPI-AP complex consisting of TEX101 and LY6K interacts with testicular ADAM3 and is required for sperm-fertilizing ability in mice (6, 89). ADAM3 is absent from the Triton X-114 detergent-enriched phase of Ace KO spermatozoa (84). These findings raised the possibility that removal of the TEX101/LY6K complex is mediated by ACE’s GPIase activity, which could reasonably explain the link between GPI-APs and ADAM3. In vitro analysis in a HEK293T culture system showed that TEX101, not LY6K, is the specific substrate for ACE and that dipeptidase-defective ACE retains its GPIase activity (6, 7, 89) (Table 1). These findings are consistent with the aberrant persistence of the TEX101/LY6K complex on spermatozoa in Ace KO mice. Thus, ACE’s GPIase activity in the formation of fertile spermatozoa is independent of its well-known dipeptidase activity (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fate of GPI-AP complex, TEX101/LY6K, ADAM3, and ACE during spermatogenesis. A: In round spermatids, a GPI-AP complex consisting of TEX101 and LY6K and an immature form of ADAM3 were both localized on the plasma membrane (6, 89). The association with TEX101 is essential for ADAM3 (pale orange to dark orange) to be spliced properly to form mature ADAM3 (red) in spermatozoa. B: Without TEX101, LY6K disappeared from testicular germ cells. ADAM3 (gray) on epididymal spermatozoa was degraded during epididymal maturation, and TEX101 KO male mice were infertile (6). C: Without LY6K, TEX101 and ADAM3 seemed to be processed normally during spermatogenesis. LY6K KO male mice were sterile, even though ADAM3 localized normally in LY6K KO spermatozoa (89). This implies the existence of a key factor (Protein X) in mammalian spermatozoa other than ADAM3. D: The removal of the TEX101/LY6K complex was mediated by ACE. Without ACE, TEX101/LY6K remained on spermatozoa, and the localization of ADAM3 on epididymal spermatozoa became aberrant. ACE KO mice became infertile, possibly because of nonfunctional ADAM3 (6, 84).

GPI-APs and sperm-oocyte extracellular matrix interaction

When spermatozoa arrive in the oviduct, they encounter ovulated eggs surrounded by a layer of cumulus cells. SPAM1 was identified as a sperm GPI-anchored receptor for the ZP in guinea pigs and was later reported to have hyaluronidase activity that enables spermatozoa to pass through the cumulus-cell oocyte complex in mice (9092). Spam1 KO mice are fertile, and Spam1-deficient spermatozoa bind to the ZP, although they have a reduced ability to disperse cumulus cells via hyaluronidase activity in vitro (93). PRSS21, another surface GPI-AP, helps spermatozoa penetrate the ZP (94). However, Prss21 KO mice are fertile, and their spermatozoa can penetrate the ZP despite the absence of PRSS21 (95). While they may play a role in fertilization, these GPI-APs did not affect in vivo fertilization in the KO experiments.

GPI-APs and sperm-egg fusion

Sperm-egg fusion is one of the last steps of fertilization. After acrosome reaction and ZP penetration, spermatozoa fuse with egg. Until recently, only two factors were known to be essential for fusion: the transmembrane protein CD9 in the egg and IZUMO1 (named after a Japanese shrine dedicated to marriage) in spermatozoa (9699). However, recombinant IZUMO1 can bind to Cd9 KO oocytes, suggesting the existence of IZUMO1-specific ligands rather than CD9 on the egg surface (100).

Besides these transmembrane proteins, there is evidence that GPI-APs on the egg plasma membrane have an essential role in fusion. When mouse oocytes are treated with PI-PLC, GPI-AP clusters are released from the egg surface and spermatozoa fail to fuse with the eggs (101). In addition, oocyte-specific depletion of GPI-AP phosphatidylinositol glycan class A, which is essential for GPI-AP synthesis (102), resulted in female infertility due to an impaired ability to fuse with spermatozoa (103). The GPI-AP responsible for fusion was not known until 2014, when Gavin J. Wright’s group, using pentamerized IZUMO1 as bait, identified the GPI-anchored folate receptor 4 as the IZUMO1 receptor (IZUMO1R), which was named JUNO after the Roman goddess of fertility and marriage (104) (Table 1). They also showed that Izumo1r KO females are infertile and that Izumo1r-deficient eggs cannot fuse with spermatozoa. The interaction between IZUMO1 in spermatozoa and IZUMO1R in eggs is essential for sperm-egg fusion during fertilization (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Molecular mechanism of sperm-egg fusion. A: IZUMO1 and CD9 have been identified as essential factors for sperm-egg fusion (9699). IZUMO1 is an acrosomal membrane protein that is exposed after the acrosome reaction. Fusion-competent spermatozoa exhibit the equatorial segment pattern of IZUMO1 in acrosome-reacted spermatozoa (108). Except at the metaphase plate, CD9 is localized on the cilia, distributed across the surface of unfertilized eggs. CD9-containing vesicles released from the egg surface interact with the sperm surface (109) and may enhance sperm-egg fusion. However, interaction between the two factors has not been observed. Recently, the egg binding partner for IZUMO1 on the egg surface, IZUMO1R/JUNO, was identified as a GPI-AP (104). B: After fertilization, IZUMO1R is rapidly shed from the egg membrane through an unknown mechanism, possibly mediated by vesiculation or by an unidentified GPIase activity. These events may be a possible mechanism for the polyspermy block at the plasma membrane in eggs.

Fertilized oocytes need to prevent fusion with other spermatozoa. Although highly expressed on the surface of unfertilized eggs, IZUMIO1R is undetectable on the egg membrane within 40 min after fertilization. IZUMO1R is redistributed into vesicles, presumably derived from the microvillus-rich oolemma, within the perivitelline space (104). This postfertilization disappearance of IZUMO1R prevents polyspermy. These findings demonstrate the importance of IZUMO1R for sperm-egg fusion and shed light on the novel mechanism and physiological function of the removal of GPI-APs from the egg surface (Fig. 3B).

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Cell-surface GPI-APs are released by GPIase activity in many important biological events, including cellular proliferation, development, neurogenesis, and reproduction. However, it has been challenging to identify the responsible enzymes and mechanisms because GPI-APs can be released from the membrane by many mechanisms, such as vesiculation and cleavages at the peptide or GPI-anchor domains. In this review, we focused on the well-characterized GPIases (GPI-PLD, NOTUM, GDE2, and ACE), but some questions remain to be addressed. Although other groups have questioned the GPIase activity of ACE, we recently showed that ACE has substrate-specific GPIase activity that is independent of its dipeptidase activity. The catalytic domains and the cleaving mechanism involved need to be clarified. On the other hand, surprisingly, NOTUM acts as an extracellular protein deacylase rather than a GPIase (56, 57). Further experiments are required to establish that NOTUM does not have any GPIase activity.

Most of the GPIases and their substrates have been identified and analyzed in vitro, and their physiological functions have not been investigated in vivo. In vivo studies will be facilitated by using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 system, a genome-manipulation technology that will enable us to generate gene-disrupted mice within a few months (105, 106). With this system, enzymes and substrates can be tagged, so their fates can be traced and the proteins they interact with in vivo can be identified. In addition, point mutations can be introduced to identify the catalytic domains and substrate recognition sites.

The release of GPI-APs is also important from the clinical point of view. Like CEACAM5 and TDGF1, some circulating GPI-APs can be used as clinical biomarkers of disease (22, 33). Because GPIase has substrate specificity, it could also be a potential target for drug development. Given their location and function in the extracellular space, GPI-APs are also good therapeutic targets. Small-molecule screening will help decipher the mechanism of release of GPI-APs and will also open new avenues for the development of drugs to treat GPI-associated diseases.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ferheen Abbasi and Stephen Ordway for editorial support.

Footnotes

Abbreviations:

ACE
angiotensin-converting enzyme
ADAM3
a disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 3
CEA
carcinoembryonic antigen
CEACAM
carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell-adhesion molecule
DALLY
division abnormally delayed
DLL1
Delta-like 1
DLP
division abnormally delayed-like protein
GDE
glycerophosphodiesterase
GDPD
glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase
GPC
glypican
GPI
glycosylphosphatidylinositol
GPI-AP
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein
GPIase
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein-releasing
GPI-PLC
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C
GPI-PLD
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase D
IZUMO1R
IZUMO1 receptor
LY6K
lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus K
PGAP1
post-GPI attachment to proteins 1
PI-PLC
phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C
PLAU
plasminogen activator urokinase
PLAUR
PLAU receptor
PRSS
protease serine
RECK
reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with kazal motifs
SPAM1
sperm-adhesion molecule 1
TDGF1
teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor 1
TEX101
testis-expressed gene 101
ZP
zona pellucida

This work was partly supported by Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)/Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (15K14366 and 15H05573 for Y.F., 25112007 and 25250014 for M.I.) and Takeda Science Foundation.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ferguson M. A. J., Kinoshita T., and Hart G. W.. 2009. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors. In Essentials of Glycobiology. A. Varki, R. D. Cummings, J. D. Esko, et al., editors. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kinoshita T. 2014. Biosynthesis and deficiencies of glycosylphosphatidylinositol. Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B, Phys. Biol. Sci. 90: 130–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ikezawa H. 2002. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 25: 409–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tsai Y. H., Liu X., and Seeberger P. H.. 2012. Chemical biology of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51: 11438–11456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Park S., Lee C., Sabharwal P., Zhang M., Meyers C. L., and Sockanathan S.. 2013. GDE2 promotes neurogenesis by glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor cleavage of RECK. Science. 339: 324–328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fujihara Y., Tokuhiro K., Muro Y., Kondoh G., Araki Y., Ikawa M., and Okabe M.. 2013. Expression of TEX101, regulated by ACE, is essential for the production of fertile mouse spermatozoa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110: 8111–8116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kondoh G., Tojo H., Nakatani Y., Komazawa N., Murata C., Yamagata K., Maeda Y., Kinoshita T., Okabe M., Taguchi R., et al. 2005. Angiotensin-converting enzyme is a GPI-anchored protein releasing factor crucial for fertilization. Nat. Med. 11: 160–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kreuger J., Perez L., Giraldez A. J., and Cohen S. M.. 2004. Opposing activities of Dally-like glypican at high and low levels of Wingless morphogen activity. Dev. Cell. 7: 503–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Metz C. N., Brunner G., Choi-Muira N. H., Nguyen H., Gabrilove J., Caras I. W., Altszuler N., Rifkin D. B., Wilson E. L., and Davitz M. A.. 1994. Release of GPI-anchored membrane proteins by a cell-associated GPI-specific phospholipase D. EMBO J. 13: 1741–1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Low M. G., and Prasad A. R.. 1988. A phospholipase D specific for the phosphatidylinositol anchor of cell-surface proteins is abundant in plasma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85: 980–984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Davitz M. A., Hereld D., Shak S., Krakow J., Englund P. T., and Nussenzweig V.. 1987. A glycan-phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase D in human serum. Science. 238: 81–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heller M., Butikofer P., and Brodbeck U.. 1994. Generation by limited proteolysis of a catalytically active 39-kDa protein from the 115-kDa form of phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific phospholipase D from bovine serum. Eur. J. Biochem. 224: 823–833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Springer T. A. 1997. Folding of the N-terminal, ligand-binding region of integrin alpha-subunits into a beta-propeller domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94: 65–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Raikwar N. S., Bowen R. F., and Deeg M. A.. 2005. Mutating His29, His125, His133 or His158 abolishes glycosylphosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase D catalytic activity. Biochem. J. 391: 285–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Blasi F., and Carmeliet P.. 2002. uPAR: a versatile signalling orchestrator. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3: 932–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ragno P. 2006. The urokinase receptor: a ligand or a receptor? Story of a sociable molecule. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63: 1028–1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blasi F., and Sidenius N.. 2010. The urokinase receptor: focused cell surface proteolysis, cell adhesion and signaling. FEBS Lett. 584: 1923–1930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wilhelm O. G., Wilhelm S., Escott G. M., Lutz V., Magdolen V., Schmitt M., Rifkin D. B., Wilson E. L., Graeff H., and Brunner G.. 1999. Cellular glycosylphosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase D regulates urokinase receptor shedding and cell surface expression. J. Cell. Physiol. 180: 225–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bugge T. H., Suh T. T., Flick M. J., Daugherty C. C., Romer J., Solberg H., Ellis V., Dano K., and Degen J. L.. 1995. The receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator is not essential for mouse development or fertility. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 16886–16894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goldenberg D. M., Sharkey R. M., and Primus F. J.. 1976. Carcinoembryonic antigen in histopathology: immunoperoxidase staining of conventional tissue sections. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 57: 11–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gold P., and Freedman S. O.. 1965. Specific carcinoembryonic antigens of the human digestive system. J. Exp. Med. 122: 467–481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tchoupa A. K., Schuhmacher T., and Hauck C. R.. 2014. Signaling by epithelial members of the CEACAM family - mucosal docking sites for pathogenic bacteria. Cell Commun. Signal. 12: 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kuespert K., Pils S., and Hauck C. R.. 2006. CEACAMs: their role in physiology and pathophysiology. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18: 565–571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Leung N., Turbide C., Olson M., Marcus V., Jothy S., and Beauchemin N.. 2006. Deletion of the carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1 (Ceacam1) gene contributes to colon tumor progression in a murine model of carcinogenesis. Oncogene. 25: 5527–5536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yamamoto Y., Hirakawa E., Mori S., Hamada Y., Kawaguchi N., and Matsuura N.. 2005. Cleavage of carcinoembryonic antigen induces metastatic potential in colorectal carcinoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 333: 223–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Verghese G. M., Tong Z. Y., Bhagwandin V., and Caughey G. H.. 2004. Mouse prostasin gene structure, promoter analysis, and restricted expression in lung and kidney. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 30: 519–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yu J. X., Chao L., and Chao J.. 1994. Prostasin is a novel human serine proteinase from seminal fluid. Purification, tissue distribution, and localization in prostate gland. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 18843–18848. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen L. M., Skinner M. L., Kauffman S. W., Chao J., Chao L., Thaler C. D., and Chai K. X.. 2001. Prostasin is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored active serine protease. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 21434–21442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Verghese G. M., Gutknecht M. F., and Caughey G. H.. 2006. Prostasin regulates epithelial monolayer function: cell-specific Gpld1-mediated secretion and functional role for GPI anchor. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 291: C1258–C1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Szabo R., and Bugge T. H.. 2011. Membrane-anchored serine proteases in vertebrate cell and developmental biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27: 213–235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hummler E., Dousse A., Rieder A., Stehle J. C., Rubera I., Osterheld M. C., Beermann F., Frateschi S., and Charles R. P.. 2013. The channel-activating protease CAP1/Prss8 is required for placental labyrinth maturation. PLoS One. 8: e55796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Peters D. E., Szabo R., Friis S., Shylo N. A., Uzzun Sales K., Holmbeck K., and Bugge T. H.. 2014. The membrane-anchored serine protease prostasin (CAP1/PRSS8) supports epidermal development and postnatal homeostasis independent of its enzymatic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 289: 14740–14749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Klauzinska M., Castro N. P., Rangel M. C., Spike B. T., Gray P. C., Bertolette D., Cuttitta F., and Salomon D.. 2014. The multifaceted role of the embryonic gene Cripto-1 in cancer, stem cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Semin. Cancer Biol. 29: 51–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yan Y. T., Liu J. J., Luo Y., E C., Haltiwanger R. S., Abate-Shen C., and Shen M. M.. 2002. Dual roles of Cripto as a ligand and coreceptor in the nodal signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 4439–4449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Whitman M. 2001. Nodal signaling in early vertebrate embryos: themes and variations. Dev. Cell. 1: 605–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Watanabe K., Hamada S., Bianco C., Mancino M., Nagaoka T., Gonzales M., Bailly V., Strizzi L., and Salomon D. S.. 2007. Requirement of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor of Cripto-1 for trans activity as a Nodal co-receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 35772–35786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Watanabe K., Bianco C., Strizzi L., Hamada S., Mancino M., Bailly V., Mo W., Wen D., Miatkowski K., Gonzales M., et al. 2007. Growth factor induction of Cripto-1 shedding by glycosylphosphatidylinositol-phospholipase D and enhancement of endothelial cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 31643–31655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ding J., Yang L., Yan Y. T., Chen A., Desai N., Wynshaw-Boris A., and Shen M. M.. 1998. Cripto is required for correct orientation of the anterior-posterior axis in the mouse embryo. Nature. 395: 702–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Filmus J., Capurro M., and Rast J.. 2008. Glypicans. Genome Biol. 9: 224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Baeg G. H., Lin X., Khare N., Baumgartner S., and Perrimon N.. 2001. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans are critical for the organization of the extracellular distribution of Wingless. Development. 128: 87–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nakato H., Futch T. A., and Selleck S. B.. 1995. The division abnormally delayed (dally) gene: a putative integral membrane proteoglycan required for cell division patterning during postembryonic development of the nervous system in Drosophila. Development. 121: 3687–3702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jen Y. H., Musacchio M., and Lander A. D.. 2009. Glypican-1 controls brain size through regulation of fibroblast growth factor signaling in early neurogenesis. Neural Dev. 4: 33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aikawa T., Whipple C. A., Lopez M. E., Gunn J., Young A., Lander A. D., and Korc M.. 2008. Glypican-1 modulates the angiogenic and metastatic potential of human and mouse cancer cells. J. Clin. Invest. 118: 89–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cano-Gauci D. F., Song H. H., Yang H., McKerlie C., Choo B., Shi W., Pullano R., Piscione T. D., Grisaru S., Soon S., et al. 1999. Glypican-3-deficient mice exhibit developmental overgrowth and some of the abnormalities typical of Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome. J. Cell Biol. 146: 255–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Filmus J., and Capurro M.. 2014. The role of glypicans in Hedgehog signaling. Matrix Biol. 35: 248–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Song H. H., Shi W., Xiang Y. Y., and Filmus J.. 2005. The loss of glypican-3 induces alterations in Wnt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 2116–2125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Capurro M. I., Xiang Y. Y., Lobe C., and Filmus J.. 2005. Glypican-3 promotes the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma by stimulating canonical Wnt signaling. Cancer Res. 65: 6245–6254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ohkawara B., Yamamoto T. S., Tada M., and Ueno N.. 2003. Role of glypican 4 in the regulation of convergent extension movements during gastrulation in Xenopus laevis. Development. 130: 2129–2138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.De Cat B., Muyldermans S. Y., Coomans C., Degeest G., Vanderschueren B., Creemers J., Biemar F., Peers B., and David G.. 2003. Processing by proprotein convertases is required for glypican-3 modulation of cell survival, Wnt signaling, and gastrulation movements. J. Cell Biol. 163: 625–635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ai X., Do A. T., Lozynska O., Kusche-Gullberg M., Lindahl U., and Emerson C. P. Jr. 2003. QSulf1 remodels the 6-O sulfation states of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans to promote Wnt signaling. J. Cell Biol. 162: 341–351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yan D., and Lin X.. 2009. Shaping morphogen gradients by proteoglycans. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1: a002493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Han C., Yan D., Belenkaya T. Y., and Lin X.. 2005. Drosophila glypicans Dally and Dally-like shape the extracellular Wingless morphogen gradient in the wing disc. Development. 132: 667–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Franch-Marro X., Marchand O., Piddini E., Ricardo S., Alexandre C., and Vincent J. P.. 2005. Glypicans shunt the Wingless signal between local signalling and further transport. Development. 132: 659–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kirkpatrick C. A., Dimitroff B. D., Rawson J. M., and Selleck S. B.. 2004. Spatial regulation of Wingless morphogen distribution and signaling by Dally-like protein. Dev. Cell. 7: 513–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Giráldez A. J., Copley R. R., and Cohen S. M.. 2002. HSPG modification by the secreted enzyme Notum shapes the Wingless morphogen gradient. Dev. Cell. 2: 667–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kakugawa S., Langton P. F., Zebisch M., Howell S. A., Chang T. H., Liu Y., Feizi T., Bineva G., O’Reilly N., Snijders A. P., et al. 2015. Notum deacylates Wnt proteins to suppress signalling activity. Nature. 519: 187–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang X., Cheong S. M., Amado N. G., Reis A. H., MacDonald B. T., Zebisch M., Jones E. Y., Abreu J. G., and He X.. 2015. Notum is required for neural and head induction via Wnt deacylation, oxidation, and inactivation. Dev. Cell. 32: 719–730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Traister A., Shi W., and Filmus J.. 2008. Mammalian Notum induces the release of glypicans and other GPI-anchored proteins from the cell surface. Biochem. J. 410: 503–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yanaka N. 2007. Mammalian glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterases. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71: 1811–1818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Corda D., Mosca M. G., Ohshima N., Grauso L., Yanaka N., and Mariggio S.. 2014. The emerging physiological roles of the glycerophosphodiesterase family. FEBS J. 281: 998–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nogusa Y., Fujioka Y., Komatsu R., Kato N., and Yanaka N.. 2004. Isolation and characterization of two serpentine membrane proteins containing glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase, GDE2 and GDE6. Gene. 337: 173–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gallazzini M., Ferraris J. D., and Burg M. B.. 2008. GDPD5 is a glycerophosphocholine phosphodiesterase that osmotically regulates the osmoprotective organic osmolyte GPC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105: 11026–11031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rao M., and Sockanathan S.. 2005. Transmembrane protein GDE2 induces motor neuron differentiation in vivo. Science. 309: 2212–2215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sabharwal P., Lee C., Park S., Rao M., and Sockanathan S.. 2011. GDE2 regulates subtype-specific motor neuron generation through inhibition of Notch signaling. Neuron. 71: 1058–1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Muraguchi T., Takegami Y., Ohtsuka T., Kitajima S., Chandana E. P., Omura A., Miki T., Takahashi R., Matsumoto N., Ludwig A., et al. 2007. RECK modulates Notch signaling during cortical neurogenesis by regulating ADAM10 activity. Nat. Neurosci. 10: 838–845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rhee J. S., and Coussens L. M.. 2002. RECKing MMP function: implications for cancer development. Trends Cell Biol. 12: 209–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Oh J., Takahashi R., Kondo S., Mizoguchi A., Adachi E., Sasahara R. M., Nishimura S., Imamura Y., Kitayama H., Alexander D. B., et al. 2001. The membrane-anchored MMP inhibitor RECK is a key regulator of extracellular matrix integrity and angiogenesis. Cell. 107: 789–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Okabe M. 2015. Mechanisms of fertilization elucidated by gene-manipulated animals. Asian J. Androl. 17: 646–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ikawa M., Inoue N., Benham A. M., and Okabe M.. 2010. Fertilization: a sperm’s journey to and interaction with the oocyte. J. Clin. Invest. 120: 984–994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sullivan R., Frenette G., and Girouard J.. 2007. Epididymosomes are involved in the acquisition of new sperm proteins during epididymal transit. Asian J. Androl. 9: 483–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kirchhoff C., and Hale G.. 1996. Cell-to-cell transfer of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins during sperm maturation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2: 177–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Boerke A., van der Lit J., Lolicato F., Stout T. A., Helms J. B., and Gadella B. M.. 2014. Removal of GPI-anchored membrane proteins causes clustering of lipid microdomains in the apical head area of porcine sperm. Theriogenology. 81: 613–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yamaguchi R., Yamagata K., Hasuwa H., Inano E., Ikawa M., and Okabe M.. 2008. Cd52, known as a major maturation-associated sperm membrane antigen secreted from the epididymis, is not required for fertilization in the mouse. Genes Cells. 13: 851–861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Qin X., Krumrei N., Grubissich L., Dobarro M., Aktas H., Perez G., and Halperin J. A.. 2003. Deficiency of the mouse complement regulatory protein mCd59b results in spontaneous hemolytic anemia with platelet activation and progressive male infertility. Immunity. 18: 217–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Holt D. S., Botto M., Bygrave A. E., Hanna S. M., Walport M. J., and Morgan B. P.. 2001. Targeted deletion of the CD59 gene causes spontaneous intravascular hemolysis and hemoglobinuria. Blood. 98: 442–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sun X., Funk C. D., Deng C., Sahu A., Lambris J. D., and Song W. C.. 1999. Role of decay-accelerating factor in regulating complement activation on the erythrocyte surface as revealed by gene targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96: 628–633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tanaka S., Maeda Y., Tashima Y., and Kinoshita T.. 2004. Inositol deacylation of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins is mediated by mammalian PGAP1 and yeast Bst1p. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 14256–14263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ueda Y., Yamaguchi R., Ikawa M., Okabe M., Morii E., Maeda Y., and Kinoshita T.. 2007. PGAP1 knock-out mice show otocephaly and male infertility. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 30373–30380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Shamsadin R., Adham I. M., Nayernia K., Heinlein U. A., Oberwinkler H., and Engel W.. 1999. Male mice deficient for germ-cell cyritestin are infertile. Biol. Reprod. 61: 1445–1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yamaguchi R., Muro Y., Isotani A., Tokuhiro K., Takumi K., Adham I., Ikawa M., and Okabe M.. 2009. Disruption of ADAM3 impairs the migration of sperm into oviduct in mouse. Biol. Reprod. 81: 142–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Erdös E. G. 1990. Angiotensin I converting enzyme and the changes in our concepts through the years. Lewis K. Dahl memorial lecture. Hypertension. 16: 363–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Krege J. H., John S. W., Langenbach L. L., Hodgin J. B., Hagaman J. R., Bachman E. S., Jennette J. C., O’Brien D. A., and Smithies O.. 1995. Male-female differences in fertility and blood pressure in ACE-deficient mice. Nature. 375: 146–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hagaman J. R., Moyer J. S., Bachman E. S., Sibony M., Magyar P. L., Welch J. E., Smithies O., Krege J. H., and O’Brien D. A.. 1998. Angiotensin-converting enzyme and male fertility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95: 2552–2557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yamaguchi R., Yamagata K., Ikawa M., Moss S. B., and Okabe M.. 2006. Aberrant distribution of ADAM3 in sperm from both angiotensin-converting enzyme (Ace)- and calmegin (Clgn)-deficient mice. Biol. Reprod. 75: 760–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Leisle L., Parkin E. T., Turner A. J., and Hooper N. M.. 2005. Angiotensin-converting enzyme as a GPIase: a critical reevaluation. Nat. Med. 11: 1139–1140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fuchs S., Frenzel K., Hubert C., Lyng R., Muller L., Michaud A., Xiao H. D., Adams J. W., Capecchi M. R., Corvol P., et al. 2005. Male fertility is dependent on dipeptidase activity of testis ACE. Nat. Med. 11: 1140–1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Yoshitake H., Tsukamoto H., Maruyama-Fukushima M., Takamori K., Ogawa H., and Araki Y.. 2008. TEX101, a germ cell-marker glycoprotein, is associated with lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus k within the mouse testis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 372: 277–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kurita A., Takizawa T., Takayama T., Totsukawa K., Matsubara S., Shibahara H., Orgebin-Crist M. C., Sendo F., Shinkai Y., and Araki Y.. 2001. Identification, cloning, and initial characterization of a novel mouse testicular germ cell-specific antigen. Biol. Reprod. 64: 935–945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Fujihara Y., Okabe M., and Ikawa M.. 2014. GPI-anchored protein complex, LY6K/TEX101, is required for sperm migration into the oviduct and male fertility in mice. Biol. Reprod. 90: 60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lin Y., Mahan K., Lathrop W. F., Myles D. G., and Primakoff P.. 1994. A hyaluronidase activity of the sperm plasma membrane protein PH-20 enables sperm to penetrate the cumulus cell layer surrounding the egg. J. Cell Biol. 125: 1157–1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Primakoff P., Lathrop W., Woolman L., Cowan A., and Myles D.. 1988. Fully effective contraception in male and female guinea pigs immunized with the sperm protein PH-20. Nature. 335: 543–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Phelps B. M., Primakoff P., Koppel D. E., Low M. G., and Myles D. G.. 1988. Restricted lateral diffusion of PH-20, a PI-anchored sperm membrane protein. Science. 240: 1780–1782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Baba D., Kashiwabara S., Honda A., Yamagata K., Wu Q., Ikawa M., Okabe M., and Baba T.. 2002. Mouse sperm lacking cell surface hyaluronidase PH-20 can pass through the layer of cumulus cells and fertilize the egg. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 30310–30314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Honda A., Yamagata K., Sugiura S., Watanabe K., and Baba T.. 2002. A mouse serine protease TESP5 is selectively included into lipid rafts of sperm membrane presumably as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 16976–16984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yamashita M., Honda A., Ogura A., Kashiwabara S., Fukami K., and Baba T.. 2008. Reduced fertility of mouse epididymal sperm lacking Prss21/Tesp5 is rescued by sperm exposure to uterine microenvironment. Genes Cells. 13: 1001–1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Inoue N., Ikawa M., Isotani A., and Okabe M.. 2005. The immunoglobulin superfamily protein Izumo is required for sperm to fuse with eggs. Nature. 434: 234–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Miyado K., Yamada G., Yamada S., Hasuwa H., Nakamura Y., Ryu F., Suzuki K., Kosai K., Inoue K., Ogura A., et al. 2000. Requirement of CD9 on the egg plasma membrane for fertilization. Science. 287: 321–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Le Naour F., Rubinstein E., Jasmin C., Prenant M., and Boucheix C.. 2000. Severely reduced female fertility in CD9-deficient mice. Science. 287: 319–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kaji K., Oda S., Shikano T., Ohnuki T., Uematsu Y., Sakagami J., Tada N., Miyazaki S., and Kudo A.. 2000. The gamete fusion process is defective in eggs of Cd9-deficient mice. Nat. Genet. 24: 279–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Inoue N., Hamada D., Kamikubo H., Hirata K., Kataoka M., Yamamoto M., Ikawa M., Okabe M., and Hagihara Y.. 2013. Molecular dissection of IZUMO1, a sperm protein essential for sperm-egg fusion. Development. 140: 3221–3229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Coonrod S. A., Naaby-Hansen S., Shetty J., Shibahara H., Chen M., White J. M., and Herr J. C.. 1999. Treatment of mouse oocytes with PI-PLC releases 70-kDa (pI 5) and 35- to 45-kDa (pI 5.5) protein clusters from the egg surface and inhibits sperm-oolemma binding and fusion. Dev. Biol. 207: 334–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kawagoe K., Kitamura D., Okabe M., Taniuchi I., Ikawa M., Watanabe T., Kinoshita T., and Takeda J.. 1996. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor-deficient mice: implications for clonal dominance of mutant cells in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Blood. 87: 3600–3606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Alfieri J. A., Martin A. D., Takeda J., Kondoh G., Myles D. G., and Primakoff P.. 2003. Infertility in female mice with an oocyte-specific knockout of GPI-anchored proteins. J. Cell Sci. 116: 2149–2155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Bianchi E., Doe B., Goulding D., and Wright G. J.. 2014. Juno is the egg Izumo receptor and is essential for mammalian fertilization. Nature. 508: 483–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Mashiko D., Fujihara Y., Satouh Y., Miyata H., Isotani A., and Ikawa M.. 2013. Generation of mutant mice by pronuclear injection of circular plasmid expressing Cas9 and single guided RNA. Sci. Rep. 3: 3355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Wang H., Yang H., Shivalila C. S., Dawlaty M. M., Cheng A. W., Zhang F., and Jaenisch R.. 2013. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell. 153: 910–918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Six E., Ndiaye D., Laabi Y., Brou C., Gupta-Rossi N., Israel A., and Logeat F.. 2003. The Notch ligand Delta1 is sequentially cleaved by an ADAM protease and gamma-secretase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100: 7638–7643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Satouh Y., Inoue N., Ikawa M., and Okabe M.. 2012. Visualization of the moment of mouse sperm-egg fusion and dynamic localization of IZUMO1. J. Cell Sci. 125: 4985–4990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Miyado K., Yoshida K., Yamagata K., Sakakibara K., Okabe M., Wang X., Miyamoto K., Akutsu H., Kondo T., Takahashi Y., et al. 2008. The fusing ability of sperm is bestowed by CD9-containing vesicles released from eggs in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105: 12921–12926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Lipid Research are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES