STP10 encodes a high-affinity monosaccharide transporter and is induced under low-glucose conditions in pollen tubes of Arabidopsis

Highlight

STP10 is part of a high-affinity monosaccharide uptake system in the plasma membrane of pollen tubes of Arabidopsis. It is down-regulated under high-glucose conditions, possibly through the hexokinase pathway.

Abstract

Pollen tubes are fast growing, photosynthetically inactive cells. Their energy demand is covered by specific transport proteins in the plasma membrane that mediate the uptake of sugars. Here we report on the functional characterization of AtSTP10, a previously uncharacterized member of the SUGAR TRANSPORT PROTEIN family. Heterologous expression of STP10 cDNA in yeast revealed that the encoded protein catalyses the high-affinity uptake of glucose, galactose and mannose. The transporter is sensitive to uncouplers of transmembrane proton gradients, indicating that the protein acts as a hexose–H⁺ symporter. Analyses of STP10 mRNA and STP10 promoter–reporter gene studies revealed a sink-specific expression pattern of STP10 in primordia of lateral roots and in pollen tubes. This restriction to sink organs is mediated by intragenic regions of STP10. qPCR analyses with cDNA of in vitro grown pollen tubes showed that STP10 expression was down-regulated in the presence of 50mM glucose. However, in pollen tubes of glucose-insensitive plants, which lack the glucose sensor hexokinase1 (HXK1), no glucose-induced down-regulation of STP10 expression was detected. A stp10 T-DNA insertion line developed normally, which may point towards functional redundancy. The data presented in this paper indicate that a high-affinity glucose uptake system is induced in growing pollen tubes under low glucose conditions and that this regulation may occur through the hexokinase pathway.

Introduction

In Arabidopsis and many other herbaceous plants, photosynthetically fixed carbon is used to synthesize sucrose, which is distributed within the plant body via the phloem. Young leaves, roots, meristems and reproductive tissues are so-called sink organs that depend on a supply of nutrients. In such sink tissues, plasmodesmata connect sieve elements of the phloem and adjacent cells. Hence, sucrose can move from the phloem through plasmodesmata into the cells of these sink tissues without leaving the cytosol (Patrick, 1997; Imlau et al., 1999; Turgeon and Wolf, 2009). However, there are some tissues or cell types that are symplastically isolated, for example the inner integument of the seed coat, the endosperm and the embryo (Stadler et al., 2005) as well as egg cells (Werner et al., 2011) and pollen grains (Scott et al., 1991). Here, the energy supply involves an apoplasmic step in which sucrose is first exported into the apoplast and subsequently imported into the sink cells by specific transport proteins. The export step is mediated by SWEET proteins (SUGARS WILL EVENTUALLY BE EXPORTED TRANSPORTERS), which are localized in the plasma membrane and transport sucrose or glucose along an existing concentration gradient (Chen et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2012). Sucrose transporting SWEETs have been localized in the seed coat and in the endosperm (Chen et al., 2015). SWEET8/RUPTURED POLLEN GRAIN1 (RPG1) exports glucose out of the tapetum cells that surround the developing pollen grains in the anthers (Guan et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2013). Sugar uptake from the apoplast into sink cells is catalysed by sucrose transporters, or, if extracellular invertases are present, by monosaccharide transporters (Sauer, 2007). In Arabidopsis a family of nine SUCROSE TRANSPORT proteins (AtSUC1–9; Sauer et al., 2004) exists and a family of 14 homologous monosaccharide transporters (SUGAR TRANSPORT PROTEIN, AtSTP1-14; Büttner et al., 2000) has been identified. STPs are members of the Arabidopsis MONOSACCHARIDE TRANSPORTER MST(-like) superfamily. The MST(-like) family includes 53 monosaccharide transporters, subdivided into seven individual families (Büttner, 2007). Amongst them, the AtSTPs constitute the best-characterized group. Nine STP genes have been characterized in detail so far. Their expression is restricted to sink tissues or symplastically isolated cells like guard cells with the exception of STP3 and STP14 (Büttner et al., 2000; Poschet et al., 2010). These large sugar transporter families allow a fine-tuned regulation of sugar supply adjusted to the type of sink tissue, developmental stage, metabolic state and environmental conditions. Especially for pollen tubes an adapted energy supply from the surrounding maternal apoplast seems to be essential as their tip growth is one of the fastest plant growth processes and efficient tube elongation is crucial to the reproductive success of the plant. The need for sugar uptake into the male gametophyte is underlined by the identification of sucrose transport proteins and invertases in pollen tubes of several plant species (Stadler et al., 1999; Ylstra et al., 1998; Lemoine et al., 1999; Maddison et al., 1999; Meyer et al., 2004). Different analyses revealed that additionally at least five STPs are expressed specifically or preferentially in pollen: STP2 mRNA and protein could be detected only during the first stages of pollen development (Truernit et al., 1999) whereas STP4, STP6, STP9, and STP11 are expressed mainly in the later stages of the microgametogenesis and/or in growing pollen tubes (Truernit et al., 1996; Scholz-Starke et al., 2003; Schneidereit et al., 2003; Schneidereit et al., 2005; Büttner, 2010). Microarray data suggest that STP11 is the most strongly expressed STP in growing pollen tubes (Wang et al., 2008; Qin et al., 2009). The same microarray data furthermore indicate a rather high expression of the so far uncharacterized STP10 (At3g19940) in pollen tubes.

In the present paper, we describe the detailed characterization of the Arabidopsis monosaccharide transporter gene STP10, which is expressed in pollen tubes and also in emerging side roots. The transport properties of the encoded STP10 protein were analysed in baker’s yeast. A T-DNA insertion line for STP10 did not show any phenotypical difference compared with the wild type (WT). The potential physiological role of STP10 for pollen tubes is discussed.

Materials and methods

Strains, growth conditions and genotyping

Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (ecotype Col-0) was grown under long day conditions (16h light–8h dark) at 22 °C and 60% relative humidity or in the greenhouse in potting soil. Plants used for the generation of protoplasts were grown under a short day regime (8h light–16h dark). For the analysis of seedlings or roots, seeds were cultivated on MS plates (Murashige and Skoog, 1962). The T-DNA insertion lines stp10-1 (SALK_207063; Alonso et al., 2003) and SALK_070739 (Alonso et al., 2003; Aki et al., 2007; Hsu et al., 2014) were obtained from the Nottingham Stock Centre (http://arabidopsis.info/). The primers STP10g+1762r (5′-ATTGGTATTGTTGTCATCATGTCCACC-3′) and SALK_LBb1.3 (5′-ATTTTGCCGATTTCGGAAC-3′) were used in a PCR to detect the mutant allele, STP10g+661f (5′-GGAACATCAAAGATGGCTCAACATG-3′) and STP10g+1762r to detect the WT allele. Segregation analysis of the stp10-1 allele was performed by PCR-based genotyping with the same primer pairs. The position of the T-DNA insertion was determined by sequencing a PCR product obtained from stp10-1 genomic DNA with the primer pair STP10g+1762r/SALK_LBb1.3. The glucose insensitive2-1 (gin2-1) mutant line (Moore et al., 2003) was kindly provided by Jen Sheen (Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital). Arabidopsis was transformed via floral dip with Agrobacterium tumefaciens Smith & Townsend strain GV3101 (Holsters et al., 1980; Clough and Bent, 1998). Escherichia coli (Migula) Castellani & Chalmers strain DH5α (Hanahan, 1983) was used for all cloning steps. Heterologous expression analysis was performed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen ex E.C. Hansen strain CSY4 000 (see below).

RNA isolation, RT–PCR and qPCR

Total RNA was isolated using the InviTrap® Spin Plant RNA Mini Kit 0711 (STRATEC). For RNA isolation from pollen tubes, pollen of about 30 flowers was germinated in vitro or semi-in vivo (see below) for at least 5h. Pollen tubes were collected by vortex-mixing the cellulosic membrane in 100 µl extraction buffer of the PicoPure^TM RNA Isolation Kit (Arcturus). RNA isolation was carried out according to the PicoPure^TM manual. The QuantiTect® Reverse Transkription Kit (Qiagen) was used for the reverse transcription reaction of about 300ng RNA each. PCR was carried out with primer pair STP10g+661f (5′-GGAACATCAAAGATGGCTCAACATG-3′) and STP10g+1762r (5′-ATTGGTATTGTTGTCATCATGTCC ACC-3′) to detect the STP10 transcript or with primers AtACT2g+846f (5′-ATTCAGATGCCCAGAAGTCTTGTT-3′) and AtACT2g+1295r (5′-GAAACATTTTCTGTGAACGATTCCT-3′) to detect the Actin2 transcript. Relative expression of STP10 and STP4 in pollen tubes was measured via qRT-PCR using the SYBR® Green Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the Rotor-Gene Q Cycler (Qiagen). Primers STP10c+1057f (5′-ATGTTCATTTGTCAGCTTCTTGTTGGT TCTT-3′) and STP10c+1305r (5′-TTGTCAAAAAGAATTGACC AATGAGAAAAGTGAAG-3′) were used for the detection of STP10 transcripts, STP4c+1071f (5′-GCTTGTCTCTCAGA TCGCTATTGGA-3′) and STP4c+1247r (5′-GAGCTG CTGATCGGATCTCTAGTG-3′) for STP4. Relative STP expression levels were normalized by comparison with UBI10 which was amplified with primer pair UBQ10+1066f (5′-GATGGTCGTACTT TGGCGGATTAC-3′) and UBQ10+1130r (5′-AGACGCAACA CCAAGTGAAGGG-3′) and calculated according to the 2^–ΔΔCT (Livak) method.

Cloning of Gateway® destination vectors

For convenient selection of transgenic promotor–gene-reporter lines, Gateway®-compatible destination vectors carrying the glufosinate resistance gene (bar) were generated. To create pBASTA-GFP the Gateway® cassette and GFP gene from pMDC107 (Curtis and Grossniklaus, 2003) were amplified with the primers Gateway+GFPf+SbfI (5′-CCTGCAGGATTCCCG ATCTAGTAACATAGATGACACCG-3′) and Gateway+GFPr+PacI (5′-TTAATTAAGTACCGAGCTCGAATTATCACAAGTTTG-3′). This resulting 2796bp fragment and all other PCR fragments of the present work were confirmed by sequencing. The fragment was cloned via SbfI/PacI into the binary plant expression vector AKK1472 (Collier et al., 2005). For pBASTA-GUS, the Gateway® cassette and GUS gene from pMDC163 (Curtis and Grossniklaus, 2003) were amplified with the primers Gateway+GUSf+XhoI (5′-CTCGAGTGTGG AATTGTGAGCGGATA-3′) and Gateway+GUSr+XhoI (5′-CTCGAG GTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTT-3′). The resulting 4041bp fragment was cleaved with XhoI and ligated into AKK1472. In order to obtain a glufosinate resistance gene containing Gateway® destination vector that allows the integration of a construct in front of a Nos terminator, the vector pMDC123 (Curtis and Grossniklaus, 2003) was modified as follows: The Nos terminator of pMDC43 (Curtis and Grossniklaus, 2003) was amplified with the primers NosT_f+SpeI+CACC (5′-CACCACTAGTAGTAACATAGATGACAC-3′) and NosT_r+SpeI (5′-ACTAGTGAATTTCCCCGATCG-3′). The resulting 274bp fragment was ligated into the plant expression vector pMDC123 via SpeI yielding the new vector pMDC123_nosT.

Cloning of reporter gene constructs for STP10

For the pSTP10:STP10g-reporter plants a 2830bp fragment was amplified with the primer pair STP10g-1064f+CACC (5′-CACCCGCTTT ATGCAAGAAACAAGAATAGTCA-3′) and STP10c+1542r (5′-ATTGGTATT GTTGTCATCA TGTCCACC-3′), cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO (Invitrogen) and inserted upstream of the GUS- or GFP::nos terminator box by the LR reaction in pBASTA-GUS or pBASTA-GFP yielding pTR92 and pTR93, respectively. For reporter plants expressing GUS without the genomic sequence of STP10 under the control of the STP10 promoter, the 1064bp promoter sequence was amplified with primers STP10g-1064f+HindIII (5′-TAAAGCTTCGCTTTATGCAAGAAACAAGA ATAGTCA-3′) and STP10g-1r+AscI (5′-ATGGCGCGCCC TTTTTTTTTCTTGCCT TTGGTCTTAGA-3′) and inserted into the Gateway® vector pMDC123_nosT in front of the attachment site AttR1 via the added HindIII/AscI sites. The coding sequence for GUS was then inserted via the LR reaction from pENTR-GUS yielding plasmid pTR112.

For the subcellular localization of STP10, fusion constructs with GFP under the control of the 35S promoter were generated. For the STP10c-GFP fusion (pTR148), the coding sequence (CDS) of STP10 was amplified from cDNA obtained from semi-in vivo grown pollen tubes as template with the primer pair STP10c+1f+CACC (5′-CACCATGGCAGGA GGAGCTTTTGTATCAG-3′) and STP10c+1542r (5′-ATTGGTA TTGTTGTCATCAT GTCCACC-3′). For the GFP-STP10c fusion (pTR147) the reverse primer STP10c+1545rev (5′-TTAATTGGT ATTGTTGTCATCATGTCCAC-3′) was used to include the STOP codon. Both PCR fragments were cloned into TOPO/pENTR (Invitrogen) and then inserted into pMDC43 (Curtis and Grossniklaus, 2003) for GFP-STP10c or pMDC83 (Curtis and Grossniklaus, 2003) for STP10c-GFP.

Isolation and transformation of protoplasts

Leaf mesophyll protoplasts were generated from Col-0 plants as described by Drechsel et al. (2011) and transformed via the polyethylene glycol method (Abel and Theologis, 1994). Transformed protoplasts were incubated for 40–72h in the dark at 22 °C prior to confocal analysis.

Microscopy

GUS plants were analysed under a stereomicroscope (Leica MZFLIII; Leica Microsystems) or a microscope (Zeiss Axioskop; Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH). Images were processed using the analySIS Doku 3.2 software (Soft Imaging System, Münster, Germany).

Images of protoplasts and GFP-reporter plants were taken on a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica TCS SPII; Leica Microsystems) using a 488nm argon laser for excitation and processed with Leica Confocal Software 2.5. Detection windows ranged from 497 to 526nm for GFP and from 682 to 730nm for chlorophyll autofluorescence.

Functional characterization of STP10 by heterologous expression

In order to generate a heterologous expression system that can be used for the analysis of both sucrose and monosaccharides transporters, the hexose-transport- and invertase-deficient S. cerevisiae strain CSY4 000 was constructed. To this end the deletion cassette of pUG73 (Gueldener et al., 2002) was amplified with the primer pair SUC2delta5 (5′-AAATAGATATGTATTATTCTTCAAAACATTCTCTT GTTCTTGTGCGCATAGGCCACTAGTGGATCTG-3′) and SUC2delta3 (5′-GTTTTACATTCGTCACTCGTTAGCTAAAGC CCTTTAGAATGGCTTCAGCTGAAGCTTCGT ACGC-3′). The primers were designed to attach the 3′ and 5′ flanking sequences of the yeast invertase gene ScSUC2 to the amplified deletion cassette. After direct transformation (Soni et al., 1993) of the PCR product into the hexose-transport-deficient strain EBY.VW4 000 (Wieczorke et al., 1999), these sequences led to the substitution of the ScSUC2 gene by the LEU2 gene of the deletion cassette via homologous recombination. Positive clones were identified by PCR with primer pair ScSUC2g-165f (5′-GATCCTATAATCCTTCCTCCTGAAAAG AAACA-3′) and LEU2MX5′out (5′-CAGAACCGGTGACC TTGGTGG-3′). Primers ScSUC2g-165f and ScSUC2g-5′out (5′-TTGGGTTGTATTGAAAGTACAGATGCCATTTG-3′) were used as a control for remaining WT alleles.

The CDS of STP10 was amplified from pTR147 with the primers STP10c+1f+NotI+YES (5′-TAGCGGCCGCAAGCTTGTAAAA GAAATGGCAGGAGGAGCTTTTGTATCAG-3′) and STP10c+ 1545r+NotI (5′-TAGCGGCCGCTTAATTGGTATTGTTGTCAT CATGTCCAC-3′) that introduced a NotI site on both sites of the PCR product as well as the sequence 5′-AAGCTTGTAAAAGAA-3′ (part of the STP1 5′UTR) (Stadler et al., 1995) upstream of the start codon. The STP10 CDS fragment was ligated into the NotI site of the vector NEV-N (Sauer and Stolz, 1994), in both sense and antisense orientation, yielding constructs pTR91 and pTR94, respectively. Both constructs were then used to transform CSY4 000, yielding strains TRY1004 (sense) and TRY1005 (antisense). For uptake experiments with ¹⁴C-labelled sugars, yeast strains were precultured in maltose–casamino acids medium [0.67% (w/v) yeast nitrogen base, 1% (w/v) casamino acids, 0.01% (w/v) Trp and 2% (w/v) maltose] to an A ₆₀₀ of 1, and transport tests were performed as described by Sauer and Stadler (1993).

Pollen germination assays

In vitro pollen germination for RNA extraction and growth analysis was done as described (Rodriguez-Enriquez et al., 2012), but only 200mM sucrose was added to the medium. The same medium was used for semi-in vivo pollen germination, which was performed by pollinating stigmata, cutting them off and placing them horizontally onto the cellulosic membrane of the growth medium to allow the outgrowth of the pollen tubes from the cut surface (Palanivelu and Preuss, 2006). Pollen tube length was measured with a self-written half automatic program in Python (Python Software Foundation, Beaverton, OR, USA) and plotted with Matplotlib (Hunter, 2007), which was also used for all other graphs. Pollen germination rate was counted using ImageJ 1.47 (Schneider et al., 2012).

Results

Sequence analysis of STP10

The STP10 CDS was amplified from total mRNA of pollen tubes. Comparison with the genomic sequence confirmed the predicted exon/intron structure with three exons separated by two introns (Fig. 7A). Five possible intron positions are known in the STP gene family, of which positions 1, 2 and 5 are highly conserved (Büttner et al., 2000). The introns of STP10 correspond to positions 2 and 5, and hence STP10 is the only member of the family not having an intron at position 1. The protein encoded by STP10 comprises 514 amino acids and has a calculated molecular mass of 56.2kDa and an estimated isoelectric point of 8.0 (http://isoelectric.ovh.org/). The STP10 protein is predicted to have 12 transmembrane domains like all other members of the STP family. The sequence includes three Asn–X–Ser consensus sequences for N-glycosylation, but two of them are localized within transmembrane domains and are, therefore, most likely not glycosylated. Although STP10 and STP4 evolved by tandem gene duplication (Johnson and Thomas, 2007) and are direct neighbours on chromosome 3, their encoded proteins only display 64% identical and 79% similar amino acids. The closest relative of STP10 is STP9 on chromosome 1, with 85% identical and 95% similar positions, followed by STP11 and STP4.

Fig. 7.

Characterization of the stp10-1 T-DNA insertion line (SALK_207063). (A) Genomic organization of STP10. Exon regions containing coding sequences (grey bars) are numbered; introns and untranslated regions are shown as black lines. Arrows indicate the primers used in (B) and (C) and their orientation. The position of the T-DNA insertion with the orientation of the left border (LB) at the beginning of the second intron is marked. (B) PCR products obtained from genomic DNA preparations of a Col-0 and a homozygous stp10-1 plant with the primer combinations STP10g+661fw/STP10g+1762r for the detection of the WT allele (WT) and LBb1.3/STP10g+1762r for the mutant allele (m). (C) PCR analyses of STP10 cDNAs derived from pollen tube RNA of a homozygous stp10-1 mutant plant and of a WT plant with primers amplifying the STP10 sequence either traversing (STP10g+661f/STP10g+1762r) or upstream of (STP10g+661f/STP10g+1089r) or downstream of the insertion (STP10g+1343f/STP10g+1762r). WT genomic DNA was used as a control for genomic contaminations. PCR with Actin2-specific primers confirmed the presence of cDNA. (D– F) Phenotypic analyses of stp10-1 mutant plants. (D) Number of side roots of 14-day-old stp10-1 and WT seedlings on MS medium without sugars (MS-0), with 2% (w/v) glucose (MS-Gluc) or with 2% (w/v) sucrose (MS-Suc); n>20 for each sample. (E) Lengths of stp10-1 and WT pollen tubes germinated in vitro for 6h. Mean values (±SE) of three biological replicates are shown (n>250 for each genotype in each experiment). (F) Genotypes regarding STP10 in the F1 descendants of a cross-pollination experiment with WT pistils and pollen from a heterozygous stp10-1/STP10 plant. Bars represent mean values (±SE) of the percentage of each genotype in the F1 generation of four independent crossings (n=100 in total). There were no statistical differences according to Student’s t-test.

Analysis of STP10 expression in flowers

To investigate the predicted expression of STP10 in pollen tubes and to screen for STP10 expression in other floral tissues, RT-PCRs were performed on RNA preparations isolated from whole open flowers, in vitro grown pollen tubes, virgin stigmata, pollinated pistils, semi-in vivo grown pollen tubes including the stigmata, anthers and receptacles with the nectaries. A PCR reaction with Actin2-specific primers served as a control for the presence of intact cDNA in each sample. As shown in Fig. 1, a PCR product could be amplified from whole flowers with STP10-specific primers. After 36 PCR cycles no product could be obtained from virgin stigmata, anthers or the receptacle indicating that there is no expression of STP10 in these parts of the flower. From pollinated pistils and pollen tubes grown in vitro or semi-in vivo, the STP10-specific fragment could be amplified. As virgin stigmata showed no STP10 expression, the PCR product in pollinated pistils and semi-in vivo grown pollen tubes probably did not originate from maternal tissues, but from the pollen tubes in these RNA preparations.

Fig. 1.

RT-PCR analysis of STP10 expression in different floral tissues. Total RNA preparations from whole flowers, in vitro germinated pollen tubes, virgin stigmata, pollinated pistils, semi-in vivo grown pollen tubes (pollinated stigmata), anthers and receptacles with nectaries were tested for STP10 expression with primers specific for STP10. Arrows indicate the size of PCR products derived from reverse-transcribed mRNA (white) and genomic DNA (black). The presence of RNA in each sample was confirmed with Actin2-specific primers.

Reporter gene analysis of STP10 expression

To examine the STP10 expression in detail, transgenic Arabidopsis plants were generated. pSTP10:STP10g-GFP and pSTP10:STP10g-GUS plants driving reporter gene expression from a 1064bp promoter fragment were obtained by agrobacteria-mediated transformation of Col-0 WT plants with the vector pTR92 (GUS) or pTR93 (GFP). Of the transformants obtained, nine pSTP10:STP10g-GFP lines and six pSTP10:STP10g-GUS lines were analysed. In non-floral tissues GUS staining could be observed only in roots (Fig. 2A), where it was restricted to the adventitious root meristem and emerging lateral roots (Fig. 2B). Older roots showed no GUS activity (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 2.

STP10 promoter activity in pSTP10:STP10g-GUS reporter plants. Histochemical detection of β-glucuronidase activity in Arabidopsis Col-0 expressing a pSTP10:STP10g-GUS fusion construct. (A) Seven-day-old seedling with GUS staining in an emerging side root (arrowhead) and the adventitious root meristem (arrow). (B) Side root bud at a higher magnification. (C) Pollinated flower. The arrowhead indicates pollen tubes growing through the ovary. (D) Non-pollinated flower. (E) Peeled ovaries with GUS-positive pollen tubes in the transmitting tract and the funiculi. (F, G) Pollen tubes grown semi-in vivo (F) or in vitro (G). Scale bars: 1mm in (A); 500 µm in (C, D); 50 µm in (B, E, F, G).

Fig. 3.

Comparison of GUS expression in pSTP10:STP10g-GUS and pSTP10:GUS reporter plants. Detection of β-glucuronidase activity in Arabidopsis Col-0 expressing a pSTP10:STP10g-GUS fusion construct (A–E) or merely pSTP10:GUS (F–I) in flowers (A, F), rosette leaves (B, G), stems (C, H), roots (D, I) and semi-in vivo grown pollen tubes (E, J). Inset in (E, J): higher magnification of pollen tubes. All tissues were stained for the same time for both reporter plant types. Scale bars: 500 µm in (A, C, D, F, H, I); 2.5mm in (B, G); 100 µm in (E, J).

All other vegetative tissues showed no GUS staining. In flowers a blue staining could be detected in pollinated pistils (Fig. 2C) and the staining was even more intense when the pistil was opened prior to staining (Fig. 2E). Strong GUS activity was detectable in pollen tubes grown in vitro (Fig. 2G) or semi-in vivo (Fig. 2F). The intense GUS activity in pollen tubes led to the hypothesis that the GUS staining in pistils (Fig. 2C/E) originated from the pollen tubes growing through and not from the maternal tissue itself. This hypothesis was confirmed by the absence of GUS staining in unpollinated flowers (Fig. 2D) and the analysis of plants expressing GFP as a reporter gene (Fig. 4). GFP fluorescence in the pistil originated only from pollen tubes growing through the transmitting tract (Fig. 4A) and along the funiculi (Fig 4B).

Fig. 4.

STP10 promoter activity and subcellular localization of STP10. (A–D) Detection of GFP fluorescence (green) in pSTP10:STP10-GFP reporter plants. (A) Partially opened style with pollen tubes growing in the transmitting tract. (B) Pollen tubes growing along the funiculus towards an ovule. (C) Semi-in vivo germinated pollen tubes. (D) Optical section through pollen tubes. (E, F) Single optical section (E) and maximum projection (F) of a mesophyll protoplast expressing GFP-STP10c under the control of the 35S promoter. Chlorophyll autofluorescence is shown in red. Scale bars: 100 µm in (A); 150 µm in (B); 50 µm in (C); 10 µm in (D, E, F).

This finding is consistent with the absence of STP10 mRNA in virgin stigmata and its presence in pollinated stigmata shown by RT-PCR. The absence of STP10 expression in anthers confirmed both by RT-PCR and reporter gene analysis indicated that STP10 expression is induced during pollen germination and that the STP10 protein is localized exclusively in growing pollen tubes.

Interestingly, in reporter plants expressing GUS directly under the control of the STP10 promoter (pSTP10:GUS), GUS staining was not restricted to pollen tubes and side root meristems (Fig. 3). Plants expressing GUS without the genomic sequence of STP10 showed a strong GUS activity also in whole roots, leaves, stems, sepals, anthers, and stigmata (Fig. 3F–I). However, the GUS staining of pollen tubes (Fig. 3J) in all 12 analysed plants was weaker compared with all tested pSTP10:STP10g-GUS plants. The presence of the genomic STP10 sequence therefore seems to be necessary for both restricting the GUS expression to pollen tubes and side root buds and enhancing its expression in pollen tubes.

Optical sections of pollen tubes (Fig. 4C) suggested that STP10-GFP is localized at the plasma membrane of the pollen tubes (Fig. 4D). To further analyse the subcellular localization, STP10-GFP and GFP-STP10 fusion constructs were expressed in Arabidopsis protoplasts under the control of the 35S promoter. In single optical sections (Fig. 4E) and maximum projections (Fig. 4F) the GFP-STP10 fusion protein labelled the plasma membrane. STP10-GFP showed the same subcellular localization (Supplementary Fig. S1 at JXB online), characterizing STP10 as a plasma membrane protein.

Functional characterization of STP10 by heterologous expression in yeast

To investigate the transport properties of the encoded protein, STP10 was expressed in a hexose-transport- and invertase-deficient yeast mutant. This novel yeast strain was generated from the hexose-transport-deficient strain EBY.VW4000 (Wieczorke et al., 1999) by deleting the invertase gene (Δsuc2) and inserting the LEU2 gene from Klyveromyces lactis that complemented the leu2 mutation of EBY.VW4 000. The resulting strain CSY4 000 constitutes a useful heterologous expression system for sugar transporters and allows testing of their uptake properties for both sucrose and monosaccharides in one yeast strain. To analyse this for STP10 its CDS was amplified by PCR and cloned into the yeast expression vector NEV-N (Sauer and Stolz, 1994). The forward primer extended the N-terminal sequence for a part of the STP1 5′UTR in front of the start codon. This sequence is reported to optimize the expression of plant genes in baker’s yeast (Stadler et al., 1995). As shown in Fig. 5A, the yeast strain expressing STP10 in sense orientation (TRY1004) regained the ability to accumulate [¹⁴C]glucose, while expression of the STP10 gene in antisense orientation (TRY1005) did not restore the uptake. TRY1004 was used to determine the K _M value, pH optimum and substrate specificity of STP10. The K _M of STP10 for glucose was measured to be 7.6±1.7 µM (Fig. 5B), which is the lowest value of all STPs characterized so far (Sauer et al., 1990; Truernit et al., 1996; Truernit et al., 1999; Büttner et al., 2000; Scholz-Starke et al., 2003). The maximum uptake rate (V _max) for glucose was 149±24 µmol h⁻¹ gFW⁻¹. The pH optimum for glucose uptake was rather broad with a peak at pH 5.5 (Fig. 5C), which is consistent with pH optima reported for other STP family members. It was directly shown by uptake measurements with the respective radioactive labelled sugars that STP10 transports glucose and galactose at similar rates, but almost no uptake of [¹⁴C]fructose could be detected (Fig. 5D). Possible uptake of other sugars was tested by measuring the uptake of [¹⁴C]glucose in the presence of an excess of non-radioactive sugars. The pentoses xylose and ribose as well as the disaccharide sucrose did not interfere with glucose uptake (Fig. 5D). Mannose reduced the uptake rate of [¹⁴C]glucose to 64%, indicating that it is transported, but at a lower rate than glucose and galactose, which led to a reduction of [¹⁴C]glucose uptake to 15% and 41%, respectively, when added in the non-radioactive form. Non-radioactive fructose did not interfere with glucose uptake. Furthermore, glucose uptake decreased significantly in the presence of carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl-hydrazone (CCCP), an uncoupler of transmembrane proton gradients, suggesting that sugar uptake via STP10 is driven by a proton gradient across the plasma membrane, as has been shown for other STPs (Sauer et al., 1990; Truernit et al., 1996; Truernit et al., 1999; Büttner et al., 2000; Scholz-Starke et al., 2003; Schneidereit et al., 2005). Taken together, these results indicate that STP10 is an energy-dependent, high affinity hexose–H⁺ symporter.

Fig. 5.

Characterization of STP10 transport activity in transgenic baker′s yeast. (A) Uptake of [¹⁴C]glucose into yeast strains TRY1004 (expressing STP10 in sense orientation, circles) and TRY1005 (control strain expressing STP10 in antisense orientation; triangles) per gram fresh weight (FW) at an initial outside concentration of 100 µM glucose at pH 5.5. (B) Uptake rates for increasing concentrations of [¹⁴C]glucose were determined for the calculation of the K _M value for D-glucose uptake of the STP10-expressing yeast strain TRY1004 according to Lineweaver–Burk. The plot represents mean values of at least three biological replicates for each sugar concentration including standard deviations. (C) Uptake rate of [¹⁴C]glucose into TRY1004 at different pH values at an initial outside concentration of 20 µM glucose. (D) Determination of the substrate specificity and sensitivity to uncouplers of STP10. Relative uptake rates of [¹⁴C]galactose and [¹⁴C]fructose were measured at an initial outside concentration of 100 µM at pH 5.5. Transport activity of STP10 for other sugars was determined by competitive inhibition of glucose uptake (10 µM initial outside concentration) in the presence of non-radioactive sugars in 10-fold excess. The addition of 100 µM cold glucose was used as a control. The uncoupler CCCP was added to a final concentration of 50 µM. Data represent means and standard errors (SE) of three independent biological replicates.*P≤0.05, ***P≤0.001 by Student’s t-test.

Glucose-mediated regulation of STP10 expression in pollen tubes

It has been reported that the expression of several STPs (STP1, STP4, STP13 and STP14) is strongly repressed by glucose (Büttner et al., 2000; Price et al., 2004; Cordoba et al., 2014). In order to analyse whether this transcriptional regulation applies also for STP10, pollen of Col-0 plants was germinated in vitro on media containing only 200mM sucrose or 200mM sucrose and glucose. Pollen tubes grown on a higher sucrose concentration or on medium supplemented with mannitol instead of glucose were used as controls. The relative expression rate of STP10 was determined by qPCR (Fig. 6A). No significant difference between STP10 expression in pollen tubes grown either on 200mM sucrose (black bars in Fig. 6), or 250mM sucrose (dark grey) or 200mM sucrose + 50mM mannitol (light grey) was observed. Though the expression was slightly reduced when the medium contained mannitol, this difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, addition of glucose to the medium (mid-grey) led to a significant decrease of STP10 expression (only 12% compared with the medium containing 200mM sucrose). As the addition of another 50mM sucrose or of 50mM mannitol to the 200mM sucrose reference medium did not significantly alter STP10 expression, the observed decrease of expression in the glucose sample is most likely not caused by osmotic effects but is a specific reaction to the presence of glucose. Fructose also did not lead to an STP10 down-regulation in pollen tubes of WT plants, which emphasizes the specificity of the observed effect. However, the addition of both glucose and fructose abolished the glucose-mediated STP10 repression (Fig. 6A). It has been demonstrated that the hexokinase1 (HXK1) complex acts as a glucose sensor and mediates glucose-dependent changes in gene expression in Arabidopsis (Cho et al., 2006). To study a possible function of HXK1 in STP10 repression, we isolated mRNA from pollen tubes of two independent hxk mutant lines grown on media with or without glucose. gin2-1 (glucose insensitive2-1) contains a nonsense mutation and SALK_070739 carries a T-DNA insertion in the HXK1 gene. In both lines, the mutation leads to the disruption of many glucose responses (Moore et al., 2003; Aki et al., 2007; Hsu et al., 2014). qPCR analyses revealed no glucose-induced down-regulation of STP10 in gin2-1 (Fig. 6B) and in SALK_070739 pollen tubes (Fig. 6C). This indicates that the glucose-dependent regulation of STP10 could be mediated via the HXK1 complex. It has been reported that another gene of the same gene family, STP4, is repressed by glucose (Price et al., 2004; Cordoba et al., 2014) and is also transcribed in pollen tubes (Wang et al., 2008; Qin et al., 2009). To study the role of HXK1 in the regulation of STP4, we furthermore determined the expression rates of STP4. As shown in Fig. 6A, the pattern obtained is very similar to STP10 with almost no differences in expression between the sucrose, fructose and mannitol controls and a strong reduction of expression in the presence of glucose. Also for STP4 the down-regulation by glucose disappeared in the gin2-1 as well as in the SALK_070739 mutant, suggesting a shared molecular mechanism of transcriptional regulation.

Fig. 6.

Analysis of STP10 and STP4 transcript levels in Col-0 and glucose insensitive pollen tubes germinated in vitro on media containing different carbohydrates. STP10 and STP4 transcripts were quantified by qPCR using total RNA extracted from Col-0, gin2-1 or SALK_070739 pollen tubes grown in vitro for 5h on media containing either 200mM sucrose only or 200mM sucrose supplemented with 50mM of sucrose, glucose, mannitol, fructose or glucose+fructose. The diagram depicts expression ratios relative to UBI10 under each growth condition. Means of three biological replicates±SE are shown. *P≤0.05 by Student’s t-test.

Characterization of a stp10-1 T-DNA insertion line

To further analyse the physiological role of STP10 in pollen tubes and lateral root buds, an Arabidopsis line with a T-DNA insertion in the STP10 gene (SALK_207063; Alonso et al., 2003) was characterized. Sequencing of the mutant allele identified the exact position of the insertion to be 1175bp after the start codon at the beginning of the second intron (Fig. 7A). As no other mutant line for STP10 has been described so far, we refer to this line as stp10-1. Plants homozygous for the stp10-1 mutant allele were identified by PCR (Fig. 7B) and the complete loss of full-length STP10 mRNA was confirmed by comparative RT-PCR analyses of pollen tube-derived total RNA from homozygous mutants and WT plants (Fig. 7C). As expected, truncated STP10 mRNAs from the region upstream of the insertion could be detected also in the mutants. A possible translation of this partial mRNA would lead to truncated proteins lacking the predicted transmembrane helices IX–XII, which are therefore unlikely to form functionally active hexose transporters. Downstream of the insertion no mRNA fragment could be amplified by RT-PCR (Fig. 7C). Plants of the homozygous stp10-1 line were analysed with respect to roots and pollen tubes, which are the identified expression sites of STP10. No differences compared with the WT could be detected concerning the number of lateral roots (Fig. 7D) and the length of the main root (Supplementary Fig. S2) on growth media containing sucrose, glucose or no sugar. The analysis of stp10-1 pollen tubes also did not reveal any distinction in comparison with the WT: in vitro pollen growth assays revealed no significant difference in pollen germination rate (WT: 48%, stp10-1: 47%) or tube length (Fig. 7F). The stp10-1 mutants were self-fertile and produced viable seeds; to compare the fertility of WT and mutant plants, a cross-pollination assay was performed. Pollen from a heterozygous STP10/stp10-1 plant was used to pollinate WT pistils. The descendant generation showed a 50:50 segregation ratio of heterozygous and WT plants (Fig. 7E), indicating that WT and mutant allele are inherited equally. Hence, pollen tubes containing only the mutant allele in their haploid genome show the same fertility as WT pollen tubes expressing STP10. This confirms that the mutation of STP10 seems not to interfere significantly with pollen viability, tube growth or fertility.

Discussion

The present paper describes the functional analysis and in planta localization of STP10, a previously uncharacterized member of the Arabidopsis MST(-like) superfamily.

Expression of STP10 in the heterologous yeast system characterized the encoded protein as a high-affinity, energy-dependent H⁺–monosaccharide symporter that accepts glucose, galactose, and mannose as substrates. This group of substrates is shared by most other STPs with the exception of STP9, which is specific for glucose (Schneidereit et al., 2003). In contrast to many other STPs like for example STP1–4 and STP11 (Büttner, 2010), STP10 did not mediate the uptake of xylose. The K _M value for glucose lies within the micromolar range (7.6±1.7 µM) and thus is in line with the values measured for all other STPs characterized so far (Sauer et al., 1990; Truernit et al., 1996; Truernit et al., 1999; Büttner et al., 2000; Scholz-Starke et al., 2003) with the exception of STP3, which has a lower affinity to glucose (Büttner et al., 2000).

Expression of STP10-GFP in Arabidopsis protoplasts showed a clear localization of the fusion protein at the plasma membrane, which is the reported subcellular localization of all characterized STPs (Büttner, 2010). The tonoplast obviously is no target membrane for STPs.

Promoter–reporter gene analyses demonstrated STP10 expression predominantly in pollen tubes, and, weaker, also in emerging side roots and in the adventitious root meristem. Both the male gametophyte and roots are sink cells or sink organs, which rely on carbon supply. Hence, STP10 expression is sink specific, which is again a common feature of the STP gene family (Büttner, 2010) with the exception of STP3 (Büttner et al., 2000) and STP14 (Poschet et al., 2010), which are additionally expressed in leaves. A comparison of pSTP10:GUS and pSTP10:STP10g-GUS plants indicated that the restriction of STP10 expression to sink tissues is mediated by intragenic regions, most likely the introns. Whereas staining of pSTP10:STP10g-GUS plants only marked pollen tubes, emerging side roots and the adventitious root meristem, the reporter plants lacking the genomic sequence showed also a strong staining in other tissues, but only a weak staining of pollen tubes. In general, a promotor:GUS construct reflects gene expression driven by the promoter while a construct that includes the genomic sequence of the gene of interest provides a read-out of the presence of the protein as well. Our data strongly suggest that the STP10 gene may be expressed in more cells than those in which the protein is actually made. The genomic sequence of STP10 obviously has two regulatory effects. It is both inhibiting the expression of the gene in all tissues but pollen tubes and roots and enhancing its expression in pollen tubes. A non-linear correlation between promoter activity and protein synthesis and the contribution of introns to a strong expression have been reported for many genes of Arabidopsis and other plants (Fiume et al., 2004; Rose, 2004). For most genes the presence of the introns leads to an expression in more tissues (Jeong et al., 2007). In contrast, an intron-mediated decrease of expression in certain tissues as observed for STP10 has only been described for the AGAMOUS gene (Sieburth and Meyerowitz, 1997).

Besides STP10, STP1, STP4, STP7, and STP13 are also predicted to be significantly expressed in root tissues (Büttner, 2010), but only for STP1 and STP4 has this expression been confirmed by further analyses (Truernit et al., 1996; Sherson et al., 2000). STP1 can mediate the uptake of external hexoses (Sherson et al., 2000) and microarray data indicate expression in the whole root (Büttner, 2010). STP4 is only expressed in root tips and older side roots (Truernit et al., 1996), and not in emerging buds of lateral roots or the adventitious root meristem. The expression of STP10 in tissues not covered by STP4 expression indicates that STP10 might take over the function of STP4 in these regions. But most likely the STPs expressed in roots have at least partially redundant functions. As non-photosynthetic but fast growing tissues, the root tips, lateral roots and adventitious root meristem all rely on sugar supply from the phloem, especially as roots are reported to store almost no starch (Tsai et al., 2009). It was shown that the unloading of sucrose from the phloem in roots occurs mainly via the symplast (Oparka et al., 1994). However, the high expression of the cell wall invertase gene cwINV1 (Büttner, 2010) in parallel with at least three STPs indicates that the distribution of photoassimilates in the root could be mediated by a combination of symplastic and apoplastic transport. The transport of sugars via both the apoplastic and the symplastic routes could increase the total amount of sugar delivered to rapidly growing root parts. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that symplastic diffusion of sugars from the phloem cannot cover all the carbon requirements of the root meristem in maize (Bret-Harte and Silk, 1994). Furthermore, cell wall invertases and STPs could also have some kind of retrieval function: sucrose lost from the cells could be cleaved and re-imported via monosaccharide transporters.

The STP10 promoter activity in roots was visible only in transgenic plants that synthesized the reporter protein GUS, which also allows detection of weak promoter activity. In pollen tubes, however, both GUS and GFP were detectable. This indicates a stronger expression of STP10 in pollen tubes compared with roots.

In contrast to roots, pollen tubes are symplastically isolated. Although the pollen grains are preloaded with nutrients during their development, the rapid elongation of growing pollen tubes is an energy-dependent process and probably requires the uptake of additional carbohydrates from the surrounding tissue. The callose in the cell wall of pollen tubes is synthesized from UDP-glucose (Chen and Kim, 2009), which requires additional energy. The necessity of sugar uptake into germinating pollen and growing pollen tubes is underlined by the presence of several sugar transporters in pollen tubes.

In addition to STP10, four other monosaccharide transporter genes, STP4, STP6, STP9, and STP11, are expressed in pollen tubes, which indicates a high functional redundancy (Schneidereit et al., 2005; Büttner, 2010). This redundancy also explains the absence of an obvious phenotype in the stp10-1 knockout plants. STP11 was proposed to be one of the highest expressed genes in pollen tubes (Schneidereit et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2008; Qin et al., 2009; Büttner, 2010). Strong expression levels were also predicted for STP10 and STP4 in pollen tube transcriptome data (Wang et al., 2008; Qin et al., 2009). All encoded STP proteins were found in germinating pollen tubes, even if mRNAs of STP4, STP6, STP9, and STP11 accumulate already in mature pollen prior to pollen germination (Truernit et al., 1996; Scholz-Starke et al., 2003; Schneidereit et al., 2003; Schneidereit et al., 2005; Büttner, 2010). In contrast, our RT-PCR and reporter gene data suggest that STP10 mRNA is very weakly expressed or even absent in dry pollen and strongly induced during pollen tube growth. This is consistent with pollen tube transcriptome data, which showed a strong increase of STP10 mRNA in pollen tubes after germination (Qin et al., 2009; Leydon et al., 2013). In addition, in vitro grown pollen tubes showed strong GUS and GFP labelling indicating that STP10 gene induction did not depend on signals from the stigma, which again coincides with transcriptome data from in vitro or semi-in vivo grown pollen tubes (Qin et al., 2009; Leydon et al., 2013). Interestingly, mutants in three MYB transcription factors fail to induce STP10 expression in pollen tubes, which indicates a function of these factors in STP10 induction during pollen germination (Leydon et al., 2013). The analysis of STP4 and STP10 transcript levels has shown that both genes are down-regulated by glucose. A glucose-dependent down-regulation has been suggested for several STPs. It was recently analysed in more detail for STP1 (Cordoba et al., 2014). The glucose-dependent down-regulation of STP4 and STP10 is missing in two independent hexokinase1 mutant lines, indicating that these two genes could be regulated on the transcriptional level via the glucose sensor HXK1. However, for STP1 it was reported that its sugar-dependent regulation is independent of HXK1 (Cordoba et al., 2014), suggesting that there are different pathways for sugar-dependent regulation of STPs. Additionally we showed that the supply of fructose instead of glucose in the pollen tube growth medium did not induce STP10 down-regulation. This is consistent with recent data, which showed that HXK1 is not involved in fructose signalling in Arabidopsis, although this enzyme carries out metabolic activities for both glucose and fructose. The authors suggested that this is due to the fact that HXK1 has an approximately 100-fold higher affinity for glucose compared with fructose (Gonzali et al., 2002; Cho and Yoo, 2011). Fructose signalling responses in Arabidopsis are instead mediated by FRUCTOSE INSENSITIVE1 (FINS1/FBP), a putative FRUCTOSE-1,6-BISPHOSPHATASE (Cho and Yoo, 2011). Interestingly, we observed that the glucose-mediated down-regulation of STP10 was abolished when both sugars, fructose and glucose, were present in the medium. The latter observation could explain why no glucose-mediated STP10 down-regulation was detectable in medium containing only sucrose, which could be cleaved by cell wall invertases into glucose and fructose (Hirsche et al., 2009). A crosstalk between fructose signalling mediated by FINS1/FBP and glucose signalling mediated by HXK1 has been postulated for early seedling establishment in Arabidopsis (Cho and Yoo, 2011). Possible interactions between both sugar signalling pathways during pollen tube growth will require additional analyses of fins1/fbp pollen tubes in future research.

So far it cannot be concluded that the observed regulation of STP10 is directly mediated by the HXK1 complex, since it could also occur through a more indirect pathway. However, the observation that the glucose sensor HXK1 could have a regulatory function in the highly energy-consuming growth of pollen tubes is an interesting aspect for the general question of pollen tube energy supply. Therefore, detailed studies of HXK1 in pollen tubes should be the focus of future research interests.

In addition to monosaccharide transporter genes at least five sucrose transporter genes, SUC1, SUC3, SUC7, SUC8, and SUC9, are expressed in pollen grains or tubes (Stadler et al., 1999; Meyer et al., 2004; Qin et al., 2009; Leydon et al., 2013; Leydon et al., 2014). The sucrose transporter SUC1 was reported to be necessary for efficient pollen germination both in vivo and in vitro. suc1 knockout pollen displayed a reduced fertility in segregation analyses, even if the number of seeds in homozygous suc1 knockout plants was reported not to be reduced compared with wild type (Sivitz et al., 2008).

Apart from STPs and SUCs, Arabidopsis pollen additionally expresses the cell wall invertase gene cwINV2 (Hirsche et al., 2009). It has not been studied in detail whether cwINV2 is active only in developing pollen or also in growing pollen tubes. However, pollen tubes show better in vitro germination on medium containing sucrose. Hence, if sucrose is provided by the transmitting tissue, the disaccharide could be cleaved by invertases, transported into the pollen tube via plasma membrane located STPs and used as an energy source. The overlapping expression of at least five STPs and five SUCs in pollen tubes indicates that they have at least partially redundant functions to ensure that the male gametophyte is in any case provided with enough nutrients to complete its journey and fertilize the egg cell. The cleavage of sucrose by invertases and the following uptake of monosaccharides could contribute to a quick reduction of the sucrose concentration in the transmitting tract. This would increase the concentration gradient between source and sink and thereby promote the long-distance transport of sucrose from the source leaves to the transmitting tract.

The parallel expression of low-affinity but highly efficient SUCs and high-affinity but low-capacity STPs, some of which are induced under low glucose conditions, could be explained by the following hypothesis: under normal conditions, the pollen tube mainly subsists on sucrose; a low glucose concentration in the apoplast of the transmitting tract could be a starvation signal and lead to the induction of high-affinity STPs to gather as much sugar as possible. Alternatively, glucose could be a general signal molecule for pollen tube growth and guidance rather than a nutrient. Decreasing glucose concentrations require a higher expression of the glucose uptake system to ensure the uptake of this signal.

The presented data shed light on the important question of how pollen tubes regulate sugar uptake in response to external signals and how they make sure that their carbon demand is covered. However, it has not been analysed so far whether monosaccharides and sucrose are indeed present in the apoplast of the ovary, and if the uptake of either sucrose or glucose or both is essential for pollen tube growth in vivo. The analysis of double/multiple stp and suc knockout plants will be necessary to elucidate the physiological role of both transporter types and their respective sugar substrates for pollen development, germination and tube growth.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Figure S1. Confocal images of the subcellular localization of STP10-GFP in Arabidopsis protoplasts

Figure S2. Length of main roots of the stp10-1 T-DNA insertion line