Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epilepsia. 2015 Apr 3;56(8):1321. doi: 10.1111/epi.12979

Epilepsy surgery trends in the United States: Differences between children and adults

Dario J Englot 1,2
PMCID: PMC4809352  NIHMSID: NIHMS770502  PMID: 25847541

To the Editors

I was very pleased to read the recent study by Pestana Knight et al. entitled “Increasing utilization of pediatric epilepsy surgery in the United States between 1997 and 2009,” published in Epilepsia.1 As the authors discuss, their observation of increased utilization of pediatric epilepsy surgery in the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) is in stark contrast with our recent study utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to examine adult epilepsy surgery rates during a similar time frame.2 In our study, although there was a progressive increase in the number of hospitalizations for intractable focal epilepsy in adults from 1990 to 2008, the number of resective procedures remained constant during these years, leading to an overall reduced rate of epilepsy surgery. Specifically, we did not observe a change in surgery rates after publication of the first randomized-controlled trial demonstrating the efficacy of epilepsy surgery in 2001,3 which was followed by joint guidelines recommending referral of patients with intractable seizures to a comprehensive epilepsy center.4,5 Furthermore, our group has reported a drop in epilepsy surgeries at high-volume epilepsy centers during this time that appears to coincide with increased referrals to lower-volume hospitals that may have higher rates of perioperative complications.6

It would be interesting to know whether Pestana Knight and colleagues observed a similar discrepancy between surgery trends at high-volume epilepsy centers and low-volume hospitals in the pediatric population. Furthermore, their findings raise the important question of whether increasing rates of pediatric epilepsy surgery might actually contribute to the diminished number of procedures performed in adults, in that patients with childhood-onset epilepsy are receiving treatment earlier, and thus no longer need surgery by the time they reach adulthood. However, I am skeptical whether this is the case, given our own observation of increasing hospital admissions for focal epilepsy in adults,2 and it would be interesting to know whether the authors similarly examined epilepsy hospitalization trends in the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID).

There is reason for optimism given the findings of Pestana Knight and colleagues, the publication of a second randomized-controlled trial demonstrating the efficacy of early resection in epilepsy,7 and a recent report by Haneef and colleagues demonstrating a slight trend towards earlier surgical referrals.8 However, surgical referrals remain significantly underutilized in both children and adults, as Pestana Knight et al. observed that the number of surgical cases was only one third of what would be expected. Furthermore, both the present study and our previous investigation found reduced utilization of surgery in racial minority patients or those without private insurance.2 We must continue to educate practitioners about the increased morbidity and mortality associated with intractable epilepsy, and that focal epilepsy patients who have failed to respond to two or more antiepileptic drug regimens should be referred to an epilepsy center for comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation.

Acknowledgments

None.

Footnotes

Disclosure I have no conflicts of interest to disclose. I confirm that I have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

References

  • 1.Pestana Knight EM, Schiltz NK, Bakaki PM, et al. Increasing utilization of pediatric epilepsy surgery in the United States between 1997 and 2009. Epilepsia. 2015;56:375–381. doi: 10.1111/epi.12912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Englot DJ, Ouyang D, Garcia PA, et al. Epilepsy surgery trends in the United States, 1990–2008. Neurology. 2012;78:1200–1206. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318250d7ea. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:311–318. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200108023450501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Engel J, Jr, Wiebe S, French J, et al. Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurology. 2003;60:538–547. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000055086.35806.2d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Labiner DM, Bagic AI, Herman ST, et al. Essential services, personnel, and facilities in specialized epilepsy centers–revised 2010 guidelines. Epilepsia. 2010;51:2322–2333. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Englot DJ, Ouyang D, Wang DD, et al. Relationship between hospital surgical volume, lobectomy rates, and adverse perioperative events at US epilepsy centers. J Neurosurg. 2013;118:169–174. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Engel J, Jr, McDermott MP, Wiebe S, et al. Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:922–930. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Haneef Z, Stern J, Dewar S, et al. Referral pattern for epilepsy surgery after evidence-based recommendations: a retrospective study. Neurology. 2010;75:699–704. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181eee457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES