Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2016 Mar 28;11(3):e0152205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152205

Movement Behavior and Host Location Ability of Corythucha ciliata

Haiwei Wu 1,*, Huanxiu Liu 1
Editor: Baohong Zhang2
PMCID: PMC4809530  PMID: 27018584

Abstract

Insect movement behavior is highly important in entomological population ecology, behavioral ecology and conservation, and in invasion ecology. In this study, we used an exotic lace bug (Corythucha ciliata) as a model organism to address the hypothesis that an insect species invading a new area has a high host location ability and rapid mobility by which it can be successfully carried to a new habitat. To test this hypothesis, three movement parameters (speed, duration and distance) of C. ciliata were assessed using laboratory and field observations. We found that 5th-instar nymphs of C. ciliata could move as far as 750 cm throughout their lifespan and that they moved an average of 0.038 m/min during the first 15 minutes after release, which was significantly farther than that of other instars. Of the tested nymphs, 21.85% could locate their host trees; of adults released 20 m from hosts, 11% reached the host trees on the first day, with an average flight distance of 22.14 m and a maximum flight distance of 27 m. The results of this study partly explain the mechanism of rapid diffusion. These results are also important for predicting population spread, improving eradication surveys, and managing future introductions of C. ciliata.

Introduction

Dispersal (i.e., the spatial redistribution of populations) is one of the most significant components of entomological population ecology, behavioral ecology and conservation [14]. Because dispersal is (in part) random movement of individuals, which underlies the redistribution in space of a population [58], there is a close relationship between movement (i.e., the spatial behavior of individuals) and dispersal. Movement of insects is of central importance for them to avoid natural enemies [9], search for food [10,11], secure mates [12], and find suitable habitats [12,13].

In insect population management, movement of individuals strongly influences the area over which management practices should be applied either to increase (conservation) or decrease (pest control) the abundance of a species of interest [14]. Information on movement parameters (speed, duration, and orientation) of insect pests is essential for their control. Meanwhile, understanding the movement behavior of natural enemies is also helpful for developing effective release techniques and for predicting the efficacy of releases [1517].

Flying (by adults) and crawling (by larvae) are the two main methods of active movement of insects throughout their life history. Studies on the dispersal ability of adult insects abound in the literature [5,1526]. In contrast, few studies have measured or modeled the parameters of insect movement in larval populations for most insects, partly due to the absence of effective attractants for larvae [27].

We focus on movement behavior in the sycamore lace bug, Corythucha ciliata (Say) (Hemiptera: Tingidae). This pest is native to North America but has successfully invaded many countries in Europe [28], Australia [29], and Asia [3032]. In China, C. ciliata was initially discovered in 2006 in Wuhan, Hubei Province [33]. To date, infestations have been reported in Shanghai, Zhejiang, Anhui, Jiangsu, Guizhou, Sichuan, Chongqing, Hunan, Hubei, Henan, Shandong and Beijing [34]. C. ciliata is a specialist herbivore with a narrow host range within the genus Platanus. It has five generations per year in the above-mentioned distribution areas in China, with five immature instars per generation [35]. There are many other bioecological characteristics supporting the rapid spread of C. ciliata, such as high fecundity [36], high thermal tolerance [37,38], robust cold tolerance [39] and strong starvation resistance [40]. We hypothesize that this species may also have a high movement speed and a high capacity for host location, both of which play important roles in its rapid spread.

In the present study, we conducted laboratory and field observations to assess three movement parameters (speed, duration and distance) and the capacity of host location of C. ciliata under conditions of no food and no water. The study addressed the following specific questions: (1) How fast could C. ciliata nymphs move? (2) How far could nymphs at different ages move before they died? (3) What is the rate of colonization of new hosts by C. ciliata nymphs? (4) Could C. ciliata adults find their hosts within a certain distance? The findings of this study improve the understanding of the dispersal capacity of this new pest, which is important for predicting population spread, improving eradication surveys, and managing future introductions.

Materials and Methods

Insects

Tested C. ciliata adults and nymphs were collected from London plane trees (Platanus acerifolia (Ait.) Willd.) at a nursery of Zhongjihuajing Garden Co., Ltd, in an experimental field of the Shandong Academy of Forestry and in the Licheng District of Ji'nan City (36.846°N, 117.32°E), which has had an infestation of C. ciliata for two years. All the P. acerifolia trees and insects were kept pesticide-free in the field.

Test of movement speed of C. ciliata nymphs

Based on the test methods of Bach [41], experiments on nymphal movement speed were carried out in flat soil ground devoid of vegetation from 1 August to 15 August, 2015. Each experiment was started at 8:00 a.m and involved drawing a circle on the ground to create an observation arena 0.8 m in diameter (The diameter of the circle was determined based on a prepared test of crawling distance of first-instar nymphs of C. ciliata on paper). Five nymphs, one of each instar, was placed in the center of the arena and observed until it crossed the circumference of the circle. When this occurred, their crawling time from center to the circumference of the circle was recorded. Any nymph that did not cross the circumference of the circle after 3 hours was discarded. Thirty individuals of each instar were tested for the treatment. Each experiment was conducted under sunny and warm weather conditions. The average maximum temperature was 28.03°C and minimum temperature 26.69°C. The average relative humidity was 81.79%. Wind was also mild during the experiments, averaging 2.28 m/s (Weather data were recorded by a weather station at Xinglong Town). A new observation arena was used for each experiment to avoid possible chemical cues from previous nymphs. Fig 1 showed a schematic view of the above experimental design.

Fig 1. Model for testing the movement speed of C. ciliata nymphs.

Fig 1

The radius of the circle is 0.4m, Solid dot represents release point of nymphs.

Determination of crawling distance of C. ciliata nymphs

Experiments were carried out on square pieces of white paper (4 m×4 m) in the laboratory from 5 July to 15 July, 2015. Five nymphs, one of each instar, were placed in the center of the paper, and their respective movement tracks were drawn with marker throughout the experiment. Observation continued until the nymphs were dead. When each nymph died, the time was recorded, and the crawling distance was measured with a measuring tape. A nymph was considered dead if none of its appendages moved after all appendages were touched with a brush [33]. Thirty individuals of each instar were tested for the treatment. Each experiment was conducted on a new paper to avoid possible chemical cues from previous nymphs. The temperature was maintained in the laboratory at 26 ± 0.5°C and the relative humidity was 70 ± 5%. Fig 2 showed a schematic view of the above experimental design.

Fig 2. Model for testing the crawling distance of C. ciliata nymphs.

Fig 2

Side length of the square is 4m, Solid dot represents release point of nymphs.

Test of host location of C. ciliata nymphs

Experiments were carried out in a flat soil ground devoid of vegetation in Xinglong Town, Linyi County, Dezhou City (37.116°N, 116.745°E) from 16 August to 19 August, 2015. Before each experiment, four water-filled bottles were buried upright underground at 0.4 m north, south, east, and west from a central point. Then, four P. acerifolia branches with 3–5 leaves each were inserted into each bottle; each branch reached approximately 0.5 m above the ground, and there were no gaps in the surrounding soil. Thirty nymphs of each instar were placed in the center of the arena every morning at 8:00 a.m. The number of different ages of C. ciliata nymphs climbing up the branches was recorded over 24 hours, which was the longest lifespan for C. ciliata nymphs without food and water [35]. Populus canadensis branches of the same thickness and height were used as controls. Three replicates were evaluated for each treatment. During all the experiments the maximum temperature was 32.80°C and minimum temperature 23.20°C. The average relative humidity was 78.26%. The average wind speed was 2.11 m/s (Weather data were recorded by a weather station at Xinglong Town). Fig 3 showed a schematic view of the above experimental design.

Fig 3. Model for testing the host location of C. ciliata nymphs.

Fig 3

Solid dot represents release point of nymphs; triangles represent position of the host. The distance from solid dot to the four triangles was all 40cm.

Test of host location of C. ciliata adults

The experiments were performed in Xinglong Town, Linyi County, Dezhou City (37.116°N, 116.745°E); the collected P. acerifolia trees (height 1.0–1.5 m) were planted in a 30 m×50 m field parcel (11 tree rows×26 trees) in November 2014. There were no Platanus trees or C. ciliata insects nearby, only small numbers of jujube, poplar and elm trees. On 19 August 2015, 3–5 leaves bearing approximately 100 adults (regardless of sex) were placed at a release point that was 2 m away from the middle tree of the southern edge of the forest plot. All Platanus trees were visually surveyed at the second day after the initial release; the number of C. ciliata in each tree was enumerated, and the distance from the release point was measured with a measuring tape. The same process was conducted on 29 August 2015 and 8 September, with release distances of 10 m and 20 m, respectively. All of the adults that were found in Platanus trees were killed before additional insects were released. The interval of 10 days also ensured that there would be no living adults on Platanus trees because adult C. ciliata have a lifespan of 4–10 days in the field [42]. The release distances of 10 m and 20 m were based on the previous tests. Weather data were recorded by a weather station at Xinglong Town; weather during all experiments was sunny and warm, with an average temperature of 24.97±0.68°C. Wind was also mild during the experiments, averaging <4.80±0.12 m/s, and wind direction was predominantly from the southwest. Given the C. ciliata was not new invasive pest in Xinglong town and our test field was relatively closed and isolated, no host plants exist around. We signed a cooperation agreement with Xinglong Town People's government to kill all the C. ciliata in our test field after trial. A map of the study area is shown in Fig 4.

Fig 4. Map of study area.

Fig 4

Circles represent sycamores, triangles represent poplars, squares represent elms, seven horns stars represent jujubes, and pentagram represent release points.

Statistical analyses

The results are presented as the mean values ± SE, and all the means of movement parameters were compared among the different ages of nymphs using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The difference in the rate at which nymphs climbed up the branches (RNCB) for host trees and non-host trees was analyzed using the t-test for independent samples. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (version 15.0, 2006, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Prior to ANOVA, all data were checked for normality and equal variance. When treatment effects were significant (P <0.05), the means were compared using Tukey's test. Moving speed, distance, times and RNCB were log-transformed, and the distance per time was sine-transformed prior to statistical analysis.

Results

Moving speed, distance and times of C. ciliata nymphs

The different ages of C. ciliata nymphs tested showed large differences in moving speeds (moving speed: F3,83 = 39.15, P<0.001; crawling distance: F4,99 = 21.93, P<0.001; crawling times: F4,99 = 5.25, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences in crawling distance per unit time (F4,99 = 1.62, P>0.1). Both the moving speed and the crawling distance increased with the increase of the age of the C. ciliata nymphs. The 5th-instar nymphs moved significantly faster than other instars, and 2nd-instar nymphs moved significantly more slowly than 3rd-instar and 4th-instar nymphs, between which there was no significant difference. The moving speeds of nymphs from the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th instars were as shown in Table 1; 1st-instar nymphs was too small to be surveyed in this test. The crawling distance of the 1st-instar nymphs was significantly shorter than those of the other four instars throughout the life of each stage, averaging 41 cm. The mean crawling distance of 90.24 cm for 2nd-instar nymphs was also significantly shorter than those of the 3rd-instar, 4th-instar and 5th-instar nymphs, but there was no significant difference between these three instars (3rd instar: 165.21 cm; 4th instar: 174.72 cm; and 5th instar: 291.35 cm). One 5th-instar nymph moved 750 cm, which was the longest distance of all the tested nymphs. The tested 1st-instar nymphs crawled for approximately 8.75 minutes throughout their lifespan, which was significantly less than for the other four instars. The crawling times of 2nd to 5th instar nymphs were not significantly different at 16.89, 19.20, 18.78, and 22.70 minutes, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. Moving Speed, Distance and Times of C. ciliata Nymphs.

Instars Number of nymphs Moving speed (m/min) Distance (cm) Time (min) Distance/time
1st 24 - - 41.00±6.79 c 8.75±1.27 b 5.42±0.94 a
2nd 28 0.008±0.001 c 90.24±11.03 b 16.89±2.22 a 5.92±0.56 a
3rd 20 0.017±0.001 b 165.21±19.44 a 19.20±3.37 a 10.28±0.97 a
4th 26 0.020±0.001 b 174.72±19.57 a 18.78±2.49 a 10.92±0.76 a
5th 23 0.038±0.003 a 291.35±43.26 a 22.70±3.56 a 13.79±1.26 a

* Means within the same column followed by different letters(a, b and c) are significantly different (Tukey’s test: P < 0.05).

Host location of C. ciliata nymphs

The t-test for independent samples showed that C. ciliata nymphs had significantly different location capabilities for host and non-host trees (t = 5.82, P<0.01). Approximately 21.85% of the tested nymphs climbed up the P. acerifolia branches with 3–5 leaves in four directions within 24 hours. By contrast, only 1.85% of the tested nymphs climbed the control (non-host: Populus canadensis) branches (Fig 5). Multiple comparisons revealed that there were no significant differences between the different instars in their ability to locate host trees. The rates at which the tested nymphs climbed up the branches of host trees during the 3rd, 4th, and 5th instars were 20.00%, 24.44% and 21.11%, respectively (Fig 6).

Fig 5. Rates of Nymphs Climbing Branches of Different Tree Species.

Fig 5

Fig 6. Rates of Different Nymph Instars Climbing Branches of P. acerifolia.

Fig 6

Host location of C. ciliata adults

At the second day after their release 2 m away from the forest edge, 20 adults were captured in the forest plot, accounting for 20% of the total released adults. Their average flight distance was 3.55 m, and the maximum distance was 6 m. When they were released 10 m away from the forest edge, 13% of the released adults could fly to the forest within one day. They flew an average of 12.96 m, with the longest distance being 19 m. Eleven adults were found in the forest at one day after the release at 20 m away from the forest edge; their average flight distance was 22.14 m, and one was captured 27 m away from the release point, which was the longest distance in that group. No adults were captured in the jujube, poplar and elm trees that were 2–8 m away from the release points (Table 2).

Table 2. Flying Distance of Captured Adults from Three Release Points.

Release points CAP CAO
Number Flying distance (m, Mean±SE) Maximum flight distance (m) Number
2 m 20 3.55±0.26 6 0
10 m 13 12.96±0.78 19 0
20 m 11 22.14±0.95 27 0

CAP, Captured adults in P. acerifolia forest; CAO, Captured adults in jujube, poplar and elm trees.

Discussion

The speed and distance of insect movement have been the focus in the vast majority of studies, whether of pests or natural enemies [20,21,4347], and they are affected by both intrinsic (age, life cycle stage, gender, and physical condition) factors and extrinsic (conditions, resources, interactions with other organisms, and barriers to movement) factors [47]. Results from this study indicate that the moving speed increased with the age of C. ciliata nymphs, and similar results were obtained for the crawling distance as tested in the laboratory (Table 1). Fifth-instar nymphs moved an average of 0.038 m/min during the first 15 minutes after release, which was much faster than the average moving speed of the larvae of Altica subplicata LeC. (43 cm/day, which is equivalent to 0.0003 m/min) [41]. C. ciliata nymphs could move as far as 750 cm throughout their own lifespan, demonstrating that the nymphs also had strong diffusion potential in the forest. Although there were marked differences in crawling time between the different ages of C. ciliata nymphs tested (Table 1), the difference in crawling distance per unit time was not significant. This indicates that the older nymphs may have greater endurance than younger nymph, but the mechanism underlying this phenomenon requires further explanation.

Insects must try their best to search for, identify and locate new hosts as soon as possible to obtain essential nutrients for their growth and development once they are forced to leave their original hosts. Many studies have shown that plant volatiles are the main cues used by phytophagous insects in orientation to their host plants [4854], and the visual cues such as plant shape and color also played an important role in the process [5559]. The current study shows that 21.85% of the tested nymphs climbed the four P. acerifolia branches within 24 hours, whereas only 1.85% of the nymphs climbed the control branches (non-host: Populus canadensis) (Fig 5), which means that there may be not visual but chemical orientation toward host plants for C. ciliata nymphs. Some studies suggested that lavae ages also had influence on host location ability [5961]. But this article showed different results that the tropism is not different between different instars of nymphs based on their rate of climbing the branches of host trees (3rd instar: 20.00%; 4th instar: 24.44%; 5th instar: 21.11%) for C. ciliata (Fig 6). The mechanism needs further study.

The flying wings of adults of C. ciliata are very delicate, and these insects therefore rarely fly very far [62]; however, Maceljski [63] writes that adults "are very mobile and are good fliers". Actual measurements of flying distance have been made in this paper and their maximum flying distance tested in one day was 27 m (Table 2). Due to limited space, adults of C. ciliata were not released at a further distance, and they may fly longer distances. However, the longest flying distance in one day (27 m) showed that the opinion from Maceljski [63] is correct. Not only that, C. ciliata adults could fly faster than many insect species that are larger or smaller than them, such as Lygus hesperus Knight (4.6 m/d), Anoplophora glabripennis Motchulsky (20 m/d) and Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (5.8 m/d) [21,44,64].

Mark-release-recapture methods are a very common method of estimating insect movement in many experiments [5,6571]. The advantage of these methods is that they allow accurate characterization of dispersal behavior in the natural environment [72], but several key technical problems need to be solved. First, a long-term non-invasive marker should be selected for each insect species. The need to mark individual insects limits the size of the population that can be marked, reducing the likelihood of detecting rare long-distance dispersal events [73]. Second, the appropriate number of released insects to enable adequate recapture frequencies for statistical analyses [74] may result in density-dependent movement, leading to biased estimates of movement rate [5]. In addition, another critical problem may be the recapture method. For example, highly efficient attractants are often used in the re-identification of released adult populations. The observed dispersal distance would become shorter because the attractant shortens the dispersal distance by intercepting individuals who should have dispersed for longer distances [27]. Even if the problem above is solved, mark-release-recapture experiments have been limited by being conducted at relatively small scales [73], and predictions of movement only indicate how populations will respond in similar circumstances [75]. It must be clearly recognized that obtaining unbiased estimates of the distribution of animal dispersal distances in natural unbounded populations has long been known to be problematic [4]. Although following movement in the field is very difficult for small insects [76], some behaviors of both nymphs and adults of C. ciliata in this article were visually observed throughout the process of the release-recapture method, without disturbance from marking and luring that may affect movement behavior.

In short, results from this study indicated that both the nymphs and adults of the sycamore lace bug, C. ciliata, have some active diffusion capacity, which may very helpful in the practice of prevention of C. ciliata. For instance, based on the maximum distance that the nymphs crawl all the host need spraying at a distance of 750cm where the leaves are infesting by nymphs. Similarly, the scope of prevention needs to expand to at least 27m if the harm was caused by adults.

Acknowledgments

We greatly thank Naomi T. and Lauren L. at American Journal Experts Company for improving the English language in this manuscript and three anonymous reviewers for providing constructive comments that greatly improved the quality of our paper. We thank Xinan WANG and Xianchen LI for helpful advice and comments. In addition, many thanks to Lijun XIN, Fengqi LIU, Xingxing HUO, Min LIU, Tianxing ZHOU and Zhen LIU for assistance in the laboratory and field.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was financially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 31440033] and the Projects of Shandong Science and Technology Plans [grant number 2013GGB22002]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Doak DF, Mills LS. A useful role for theory in conservation. Ecology. 1994;75: 615–626. 10.2307/1941720 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lidicker WZ Jr, Stenseth NC. To disperse or not to disperse: who does it and why? In: Stenseth NC, Lidicker WZ Jr, editors. Animal dispersal: small mammals as a model. London: Chapman and Hall; 1992. pp. 21–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hedin J, Ranius T. Using radio telemetry to study dispersal of the beetle Osmoderma eremita, an inhabitant of tree hollows. Comput Electron Agric. 2002;35: 171–180. 10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00017-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koenig WD, Van Vuren D, Hooge PN. Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11: 514–517. 10.1016/S0169-5347(96)20074-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Turchin P. Quantitative analysis of movement Measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D, et al. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Nalt Acad Sci. 2008;105: 19052–19059. 10.1073/pnas.0800375105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schellhorn NA, Bianchi FJ, Hsu CL. Movement of entomophagous arthropods in agricultural landscapes: links to pest suppression. Annu Rev Entomol. 2014;59: 559–581. 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-161952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Allema AB, van der Werf W, Groot JC, Hemerik L, Gort G, Rossing WA, et al. Quantification of motility of carabid beetles in farmland. Bull Entomol Res. 2015;105: 234–244. 10.1017/S0007485315000012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Turchin P, Kareiva P. Aggregation in aphis varians: an effective strategy for reducing predation risk. Ecology. 1989;70: 1008–1016. 10.2307/1941369 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kareiva P, Odell G. Swarms of predators exhibit “preytaxis” if individual predators use area-restricted search. American Naturalist. 1987;130: 233–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Morris W, Kareiva P. How insect herbivores find suitable host plants: the interplay between random and nonrandom movement. Insect-Plant Interactions. 1991;3: 175–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lawrence WS. Effects of sex ratio on milkweed beetle emigration from host plant patches. Ecology. 1987;68: 539–546. 10.2307/1938459 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Johnson AR, Milne BT, Wiens JA. Diffusion in Fractcal landscapes: simulations and experimental studies of tenebrionid beetle movements. Ecology. 1992;73: 1968–1983. 10.2307/1941448 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moerkens R, Leirs H, Peusens G, Gobin B. Dispersal of single- and double-brood populations of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia: a mark-recapture experiment. Entomol Exp Applicata. 2010;137: 19–27. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.01031.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Smith SM. Biological control with Trichogramma: advances, successes, and potential of their use. Annu Rev Entomol. 1996;41: 375–406. 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.002111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Orr DB, Garcia-Salazar C, Landis DA. Trichogramma nontarget impacts: a method for biological control risk assessment In: Follett PA, Duan JJ, editors. Nontarget effects of biological control. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. pp. 111–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wright MG, Hoffmann MP, Chenus SA, Gardner J. Dispersal behavior of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in sweet corn fields: implications for augmentative releases against Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Biol Contr. 2001;22: 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rykken JJ, Jepson PC, Moldenke AR. Ground-dwelling arthropod distribution and movement across a fragmented riparian forest. Northwest Sci. 2011;85: 527–541. 10.3955/046.085.0403 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gordon PL, McKinlay RG. Dispersal of ground beetles in a potato crop; a mark-release study. Entomol Exp Applicata. 1986;40: 104–105. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1986.tb02163.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chapman AV, Kuhar TP, Schultz PB, Brewster CC. Dispersal of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in potato fields. Environ Entomol. 2009;38: 677–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bancroft JS. Dispersal and abundance of Lygus hesperus in field crops. Environ Entomol. 2005;34: 1517–1523. 10.1603/0046-225X-34.6.1517 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wright MG, Hoffmann MP, Chenus SA, Gardner J. Dispersal behavior of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in sweet corn fields: implications for augmentative releases against Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Biological Control, 2001; 1: 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tuda M, Shima K. Relative importance of weather and density dependence on the dispersal and on-plant activity of the predator Orius minutus. Population Ecology, 2002; 44: 251–257. 10.1007/s101440200028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Langhof M, Meyhöfer R, Poehling HM, Gathmann A. Measuring the field dispersal of Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2005; 107: 137–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Doukas D, Payne CC. Effects of UV-blocking films on the dispersal behavior of Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Journal of economic entomology, 2007;1: 110–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Petit JN, Hoddle MS, Grandgirard J, Roderick GK, Davies N. Short-distance dispersal behavior and establishment of the parasitoid Gonatocerus ashmeadi (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in Tahiti: Implications for its use as a biological control agent against Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Biological control, 2008; 45: 344–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arakaki N, Hokama Y, Yamamura K. Estimation of the dispersal ability of Melanotus okinawensis (Coleoptera: Elateridae) larvae in soil. Appl Entomol Zool. 2010;45: 297–302. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rabitsch W. Alien true bugs of Europe (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Zootaxa. 2008;1827: 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dominiak B, Gillespie P, Worsley P, Löcker H. Survey for sycamore lace bug Corythucha ciliata (Say)(Hemiptera: Tingidae) in New South Wales during 2007. Gen Appl Entomol. 2008;37: 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chung Y, Kwon T, Yeo W, Park C. Occurrence of the sycamore lace bug, Corythucha ciliata (Say)(Hemiptera: Tingidae) in Korea. Korean J Appl Entomol. 1996;35: 137–139. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tokihiro G, Tanaka K, Kondo K. Occurrence of the sycamore lace bug, Corythucha ciliata (Say)(Heteroptera: Tingidae) in Japan. Res Bull Plant Protect Serv, Jpn. 2003;39: 85–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ju R, Li Y, Wang F, Du Y. Spread of and damage by an exotic Lacebug,Corythuca ciliata(Say, 1832) (Hemiptera: Tingidae), in China. Entomol News. 2009;120: 409–414. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li C-R, Xia W-S, Wang F-L. First records of Corythucha ciliata (Say) in China (Hemiptera,Tingidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica. 2007;32: 944–946. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wu H, Li D, Wang X, Wang L, Li X, Liu H. Debelopment situation and control measures for Corythucha ciliata in Shandong. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology. 2013;43: 108–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ju R, Wang F, Li B. Effects of temperature on the development and population growth of the sycamore lace bug, Corythucha ciliata. J Insect Sci. 2011;11: 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.D'Aguilar J, Pralavorio R, Rabasse J. Introduction into France of the plane tree lace bug: Corythucha ciliata (Say)(Heteroptera, Tingidae). Bull Soc Entomol Fr. 1977;82: 2–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ju R, Chen G, Wang F, Li B. Effects of heat shock, heat exposure pattern, and heat hardening on survival of the sycamore lace bug, Corythucha ciliata. Entomol Exp Applicata. 2011;141: 168–177. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01180.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ju RT, Gao L, Zhou XH, Li B. Tolerance to high temperature extremes in an invasive lace bug, Corythucha ciliata (Hemiptera: Tingidae), in subtropical China. PLOS ONE. 2013;8: e54372 10.1371/journal.pone.0054372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Halbert SE, Meeker JR. The Sycamore lace Bug, Corythucha ciliata (Say):(Hemiptera: Tingidae). Gainesville, FL: Fla. Dept. Agric. & Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wu H, Li X, Liu H. Starvation resistance of invasive lace Bug Corythucha ciliata (Hemiptera: Tingidae) in China. Entomol Fenn. 2016;27: In Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bach CE. Movement behavior of Altica subplicata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): larval orientation and movement. J Kans Entomol Soc. 1993;66: 86–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kim C, Jeong J. Ecological studies on the sycamore lace bug, Corythucha ciliata (Hemiptera: Tingidae). I. Developmental characteristics, adult behavior and sex ratio. Journal of Research Forests of Kangwon National University. 1999;19: 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gui H-Y, Ge F. Diffusion of Bemisia tabaci in early spring in Beijing and Hebei regions. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology. 2011;48: 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kobori Y, Nakata T, Ohto Y, Takasu F. Dispersal of adult Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Homoptera: Psyllidae), the vector of citrus greening disease, in artificial release experiments. Appl Entomol Zool. 2011;46: 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schneider JC. Dispersal of a highly vagile insect in a heterogeneous environment. Ecology. 1999;80: 2740–2749. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Taylor DB, Moon RD, Campbell JB, Berkebile DR, Scholl PJ, Broce AB, et al. Dispersal of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from larval development sites in a Nebraska landscape. Environ Entomol. 2010;39: 1101–1110. 10.1603/EN10057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rudd NT, McEvoy PB. Local dispersal by the cinnabar moth Tyria jacobaeae. Ecol Appl. 1996;6: 285–297. 10.2307/2269572 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fein BL, Reissig WH, Roelofs WL. Identification of apple volatiles attractive to the apple maggot Rhagoletis pomouella. J Chem Ecol,1982; 8:1473–1487. 10.1007/BF00989104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ascoli A, Albert PJ. Orientation behavior of second-instar larvae of eastern spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem) (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) in a Y-type olfactometer. J Chem Ecol. 1985; 11:837–845. 10.1007/BF01012072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Huang XP, Mack TP, Berger RS. Olfactory responses of lesser cornstalk borer(Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae to peanut plant parts. Entomol Soc Am, 1990; 19:1289–1295. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tokro PG, Saxena KN. Effect of olfactory and visual stimuli on the orientation of the 4th instar larvae of the stem borer Chilo partellus Swinhoe (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae). Acta Biol Hung, 1991; 42:397–406. [PubMed—indexed for MEDLINE] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ruther S, Thiemann K. Response of the pollen beetle Meligethes aeneus to volatiles emitted by intact plants and conspecifics. Ent Exp & Appl, 1997; 84:183–188. 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00213.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mondy N, Pracros P, Fermaud M, Corio Costet MF. Olfactory and gustatory behavior by larvae of Lobesia botrana in response to Botrytis cinerea. Entomol Experi Appl, 1998; 88:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kalinová B., Stránský K., Harmatha J., Čtvrtečka R., Žd'árek J. Can chemical cues from blossom buds influence cultivar preference in the apple blossom weevil (Anthonomus pomorum)?. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2000; 1: 47–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.WyATT TD, Vastiau K, Birch MC. Orientation of flying male Anobium punctatum (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) to sex pheromone: separating effects of visual stimuli and physical barriers to wind. Physiological Entomology, 1997; 2: 191–196. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Prokopy RJ, Owens ED. Visual detection of plants by hebivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol, 1983; 28:337–364. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cornelius ML, Duan JJ, Messing RH. Visual stimuli and the response of female oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to fruit-mimicking traps. J Econ Entomol,1999; 1:121–129. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.De Groot P, Nott R. Evaluation of traps of six different designs to capture pine sawyer beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2001; 2: 107–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.McIntosh RL, Katinic PJ, Allison JD, Borden JH, Downey DL. Comparative efficacy of five types of trap for woodborers in the Cerambycidae, Buprestidae and Siricidae. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2001; 2: 113–120. 10.1046/j.1461-9563.2001.00095.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fan J, Zhang L, Wang G, Ma S, Shao H. Host plant selection and nutrient utilization of beet armyworm larvae. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011; 30:233–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wei J, Luo Y, Shi J, Wang D, Shen S. Larval instar impact on host selection suitability of asian gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar asiatica, AGM). Plant Quarantine, 2012;4:6–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wade O. The sycamore lace-bug:(Corythucha ciliata, Say). Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College, Agricultural Experiment Station; 1917. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Maceljski M. Current status of Corythuca ciliata in Europe. EPPO Bull. 1986;16: 621–624. 10.1111/j.1365-2338.1986.tb00332.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bancroft JS, Smith MT. Dispersal and influences on movement for Anoplophora glabripennis calculated from individual mark-recapture. Entomol Exp Applicata. 2005;116: 83–92. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00320.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Okubo A, Levin SA. Diffusion and ecological problems: modern perspectives. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kareiva PM. Local movement in herbivorous insects: applying a passive diffusion model to mark-recapture field experiments. Oecologia. 1983;57: 322–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hanski I, Kuussaari M, Nieminen M. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Ecology. 1994;75: 747–762. 10.2307/1941732 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kuussaari M, Nieminen M, Hanski I. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. J Anim Ecol. 1996;65: 791–801. 10.2307/5677 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ginzel MD, Hanks LM. Evaluation of synthetic hydrocarbons for mark—recapture studies on the red milkweed beetle. J Chem Ecol. 2002;28: 1037–1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wang R, Wang Y, Chen J, Lei G, Xu R. Contrasting movement patterns in two species of chequerspot butterflies, Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe, in the same patch network. Ecol Entomol. 2004;29: 367–374. 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00610.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wang X, Chen H, Ma C, Li Z. Chinese White pine beetle, Dendroctonus armandi (Coleoptera: Scolytinae), population density and dispersal estimated by mark-release-recapture in Qinling Mountains, Shaanxi, China. Appl Entomol Zool. 2010;45: 557–567. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wang R, Ovaskainen O, Cao Y, Chen H, Zhou Y, Xu C, et al. Dispersal in the Glanville fritillary butterfly in fragmented versus continuous landscapes: comparison between three methods. Ecol Entomol. 2011;36: 251–260. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01267.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sivakoff FS, Rosenheim JA, Hagler JR. Relative dispersal ability of a key agricultural pest and its predators in an annual agroecosystem. Biol Contr. 2012;63: 296–303. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.09.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cronin JT, Hyland K, Abrahamson WG. The pattern, rate, and range of within-patch movement of a stem-galling fly. Ecol Entomol. 2001;26: 16–24. 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2001.00294.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Schwarz CJ, Arnason AN. A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics. 1996;52: 860–873. 10.2307/2533048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mascanzoni D, Wallin H. The harmonic radar: a new method of tracing insects in the field. Ecol Entomol. 1986;11: 387–390. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1986.tb00317.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES