Skip to main content
International Journal of Oncology logoLink to International Journal of Oncology
. 2016 Mar 4;48(5):1886–1894. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3418

Transcriptional profiling of breast cancer cells in response to mevinolin: Evidence of cell cycle arrest, DNA degradation and apoptosis

ALI M MAHMOUD 1,2, MOURAD AM ABOUL-SOUD 1,3,, JUNKYU HAN 4,5, YAZEED A AL-SHEIKH 3, AHMED M AL-ABD 6, HANY A EL-SHEMY 1,
PMCID: PMC4809649  PMID: 26983896

Abstract

The merging of high-throughput gene expression techniques, such as microarray, in the screening of natural products as anticancer agents, is considered the optimal solution for gaining a better understanding of the intervention mechanism. Red yeast rice (RYR), a Chinese dietary product, contains a mixture of hypocholesterolemia agents such as statins. Typically, statins have this effect via the inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase, the key enzyme in the biosynthesis of cholesterol. Recently, statins have been shown to exhibit various beneficial antineoplastic properties through the disruption of tumor angiogenesis and metastatic processes. Mevinolin (MVN) is a member of statins and is abundantly present in RYR. Early experimental trials suggested that the mixed apoptotic/necrotic cell death pathway is activated in response to MVN exposure. In the current study, the cytotoxic profile of MVN was evaluated against MCF-7, a breast cancer-derived cell line. The obtained results indicated that MVN-induced cytotoxicity is multi-factorial involving several regulatory pathways in the cytotoxic effects of MVN on breast cancer cell lines. In addition, MVN-induced transcript abundance profiles inferred from microarrays showed significant changes in some key cell processes. The changes were predicted to induce cell cycle arrest and reactive oxygen species generation but inhibit DNA repair and cell proliferation. This MVN-mediated multi-factorial stress triggered specific programmed cell death (apoptosis) and DNA degradation responses in breast cancer cells. Taken together, the observed MVN-induced effects underscore the potential of this ubiquitous natural compound as a selective anticancer activity, with broad safety margins and low cost compared to benchmarked traditional synthetic chemotherapeutic agents. Additionally, the data support further pre-clinical and clinical evaluations of MVN as a novel strategy to combat breast cancer and overcome drug resistance.

Keywords: mevinolin, microarray, MCF-7, natural products, p53

Introduction

Natural products of plants provide an abundant source of potentially active compounds for the treatments of different disorders (1,2). Far Eastern, Middle Eastern, Saharan, and tropical regions are among the richest sources of natural products in the world. The isolation and purification of active fractions and active ingredients among potentially active natural products has received increased scientific and industrial interest (2).

Red yeast rice (RYR), a Chinese dietary product made by fermenting ordinary rice with the mold Monascus purpureus, has been widely used as a food condiment and colorant in several Asian countries (3). RYR has been used for centuries without any reports of health hazards or long-term toxicity (4). Several medicinally active ingredients were isolated from RYR including monacholin-K, mevinolin (MVN; lovastatin), γ-aminobutyric acid, di-merumic acid, sterols (β-sitosterol, campesterol, stigmasterol and sapogenin), isoflavones and mono-unsaturated fatty acids (3,4).

MVN or lovastatin is a potent HMGCo-A reductase enzyme inhibitor that has been shown to interfere with de novo steroidogenesis (5). MVN was used clinically for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia with extremely good patient tolerance profiles (6,7). In the last decade, epidemiological studies (8) have drawn attention to the possible beneficial roles of HMGCo-A reductase inhibitors (statins), such as MVN, in neoplastic disorders. Some members of the statin group may reduce the recurrence of cancer after radical prostatectomy (9). Additionally, a marked reduction in the incidence of lipoma was observed for statin-treated patients (10). Of note, a negative association was reported between the use of HMGCo-A reductase inhibitors and cancer incidence in veteran populations (11). Investigators focused on the ability of MVN and other statins to sensitize tumor cells for conventional chemo-therapeutics (12).

Previous experimental reports manifested a potential anti-cancer activity of MVN and other HMGCo-A reductase inhibitors per se (13). However, the exact signaling mechanisms involved in MVN-induced cell death remain controversial. Few reports attribute the anti-cancer activity of MVN to the induction of apoptosis (14), while other studies negate any role of apoptosis in MVN-induced cell death (15). Thus, whether the apoptotic pathway is involved in MVN-induced cytotoxicity, or not, remained an open issue by 2012. The resolution of the mechanism of MVN may improve understanding of its anti-cancer effects and suggest the likelihood of the emergence of resistance among cancer cell lines.

MVN has been shown to inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis and necrosis in several experimental settings including that of breast cancer, thus making them potential anticancer agents. Multisignaling distortion effects have been observed by statin treatment. Klawitter et al suggested that the anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects of statins on breast cancer cells occurs due to the induction effect on reactive oxygen species (ROS). Additionally, statins increase the level of nitric oxide (NO) through the induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (14).

In the present study, the expression of markers of apoptosis was investigated in response to MVN treatment in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Microarrays tested the transcript abundances of thousands of genes. The involvement of several regulatory pathways in the cytotoxic effects of MVN on breast cancer cell lines was shown. A model for the plausible mode-of-action of MVN-mediated in vitro cytotoxicity against breast cancer was also described.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and drugs

Doxorubicin (DOX) is a cytotoxic anthracycline originally isolated from Streptomyces peucetius which has been used as a chemotherapeutic agent. DOX was used as a positive control in quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and caspase-3 (EC 3.4.22.56) experiments. DOX and MVN were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). RPMI-1640 media, fetal bovine serum and other cell culture materials were purchased from Fisher Scientific, Cell Culture (Houston, TX, USA). Other reagents were of the highest analytical grade available.

Cell culture

Human transformed cell lines, from the breast (MCF-7) line were obtained from Vacsera (Giza, Egypt). Vacsera identified the cell line prior to conducting these studies. The cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 100 μg/ml penicillin and 10% (w/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum in a humidified, 5% (v/v) CO2 atmosphere incubator at 37°C.

Cytotoxicity assays

The cytotoxicity of MVN was tested against MCF-7 cells using an MTT assay. Exponentially growing cells were collected using 0.25% (w/v) trypsin-EDTA and plated in 96-well plates at 2.0×103 cells/well. After 24 h incubation, the cells were exposed to each test compound for 72 h and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then, fresh 100 μl media with 10 μl MTT at 5 mg/ml in PBS were added. After overnight incubation the colored form of Heidenhain's Azan trichrome stain was dissolved in 100 μl of 10% (w/v) SDS and the absorbance at 570 nm was determined using a multi-detection microplate reader. The cell viability was presented as a percentage of the control.

Data analysis

The dose response curve of compounds was analyzed using the Emax model:

%Cell viability=(100-R)×(1-[D]mKdm+[D]m)+R

R was the residual unaffected fraction (the resistance fraction), [D] was the drug concentration used, Kd was the drug concentration that produces a 50% reduction of the maximum inhibition rate, and m was a Hill-type coefficient. The IC50 was defined as the drug concentration required to reduce absorbance to 50% of that of the control (i.e., Kd=IC50 when R was 0 and Emax was 100-R) (16).

Caspase-3 activity in MCF-7 treated cells with IC50 of DOX and MVN

Cells were harvested after treatment for 72 h with the pre-determined IC50 of DOX and MVN. Caspase-3 activity was determined using a Quantikine-immunoassay™ kit (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Plates were then read at 450 nm with wavelength correction at 540 nm using microwell-plate absorbance reader (ELx 808; Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). A standard curve was constructed and the amount of active caspase-3 in the treated samples was calculated.

Microarray analysis for MVN-treated MCF-7 cells RNA isolation

MCF-7 cells were resuspended at a concentration of 2.0×104 cells/ml after 24 h incubation. The cells were treated with or without MVN IC50 for 4 h. Total RNA was extracted from the cells using 1 ml of Isogen™ (Nippon Gene Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer's instructions. Isolated RNA was ethanol precipitated, quantified and quality assessed by a Nano-Drop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). Total RNA (500 ng) was used for reverse transcription when the OD260/OD280 ratio was 1.8–2.0. RNA samples were prepared as duplicates. The experiments were repeated.

cDNA synthesis, labeling and target preparation

cDNA was produced from total RNA using the GeneAtlas™ 3′ IVT Express kit (Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Second-strand cDNA synthesis, biotin-labeled aRNA synthesis (IVT Labeling) and RNA fragmentation were performed by Affymetrix GeneAtlas® kit reagents according to the procedure described in The GeneAtlas™ 3′ IVT Express kit User Manual.

Target hybridization and scanning

Biotin-labeled and fragmented target RNA samples were loaded into Affymetrix HG-U219 Array Strip® (Affymetrix, Inc.) together with poly-A control RNA and the oligomer B2. The hybridization procedure was conducted at 45°C for 16 h in the GeneAtlas™ Hybridization Station. The washing and staining procedure was performed in a GeneAtlas™ Fluidics Station with phycoerythrin-conjugated streptavidin (SAPE) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The GeneAtlas™ Imaging Station was used for scanning the arrays, exactly as described in the Affymetrix GeneAtlas® protocol.

Preliminary analysis of the scanned chips

Analysis was performed using Partek Express software (Ryoka Systems Inc., Tokyo, Japan) which estimates gene significance difference by ANOVA. The quality of gene expression data was checked according to quality control criteria. Pathway Studio® Explore, Affymetrix Edition Version 1.1 software (Affymetrix, Inc.) was used for further data analysis and evaluation. Pathway Studio® Explore is a powerful visualization and analysis solution designed for use with genomic expression data.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with LSD post-hoc test was used to test the significance using SPSS® for Windows, version 17.0.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For the cytotoxicity bar graph, a t-test was performed to compare the cytotoxicity of different concentrations to the control group and was described as the probability associated with a Student's paired t-test, with a two-tailed distribution. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results and Discussion

Evaluation of the anticancer effect of MVN against MCF-7

The MTT assay was used to assess the cytotoxicity of MVN against an MCF-7 solid tumor cell line. The treated MCF-7 cells showed an IC50 of 2.08 μg/ml after treatment with MVN (Fig. 1). This result indicated a promising cytotoxic effect relative to IC50 of the positive control DOX (0.42 μg/ml) reported previously by our laboratory (17).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The effect of mevinolin (MVN) on the MCF-7 cell line. (A and B) Cells were exposed to serial dilutions of MVN for 72 h. Cell viability was determined using an MTT assay. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (n=3). The t-test was used to analyze the results of different MVN concentrations compared to the control group, *P<0.5, **P<0.1

Caspase-3 activity in MCF-7 following treatment with IC50 of DOX and MVN

Concentrations of active caspase-3 were measured to determine whether the apoptotic cascade was activated. In MCF-7 cells, treatment with DOX significantly increased caspase-3 activity by 8-fold and MVN by 3-fold compared to its original activity (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of mevinolin (MVN) and doxorubicin (DOX) on the apoptosis effective phase (caspase-3 activity) in MCF-7 cells. Caspase-3 activity was assessed on MCF-7 cells following treatment with DOX and MVN. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (n=3).

Transcript abundance analysis of MVN-treated cells with microarrays

The aim of the experiment was to examine the gene expressions that are modulated using microarray in MVN-treated MCF-7 cells. To analyze the early stage of the pathway and network level, we treated MCF-7 cells with MVN for 4 h. The microarray analysis was performed to investigate genes associated with triggering apoptosis in the MVN-treated MCF-7 cells.

The quality of the microarray data were within good sample limits according to preliminary data analysis parameters, such as background and noise averages, percentage of present calls, presence of internal hybridization controls in increasing signals, presence of poly-A controls as decreasing signals and GAPDH to β-actin 30/50 signal ratios. Therefore, transcript abundance data were analyzed via the pathway following local normalization.

Cell-cycle arrest

Several gene transcripts present in MCF-7 cells that were involved in the regulation of cell-cycle activity were significantly altered when exposed to MVN. In addition, changes in the related cell-cycle regulatory proteins were detected. Regulation of the cell cycle including the decrease of Rb and E2F1 transcript abundance was observed. EF2 is required for cell-cycle progression. Rb is also involved in cell-cycle regulation and can inhibit E2F. GADD45 transcripts, which control the G2/M phase transition, were also reduced by MVN treatment. MVN-induced DNA damage also had an impact on damage repair regulating pathways. One member of DNA-mismatch repair systems, MSH2, was significantly reduced in transcript abundance. PCNA, a cell proliferation marker and a control point for DNA repair, was also reduced. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) determine cell progression through the cell cycle. Both CDK1 (regulating G2 to S and G2 to M) and CDK4/6 (important for cell-cycle G1 phase progression) exhibited increased transcript abundance (Table I).

Table I.

The gene list showing the fold-change of cell-cycle arrest-related genes.

Entrez code Gene symbol Gene name Fold change P-value
9821 RB1CC1 RB1-inducible coiled-coil 1 −1.6 0.00008
5925 RB1 Retinoblastoma 1 −1.6 0.00168
1869 E2F1 E2F transcription factor 1 1.4 0.00106
83990 BRIP1 BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1 −1.7 0.00073
580 BARD1 BRCA1-associated RING domain 1 −1.3 0.00097
890 CCNA2 Cyclin A2 −1.1 0.09285
9134 CCNE2 Cyclin E2 −1.9 0.00040
1029 CDKN2A Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (melanoma, p16, inhibits CDK4) −1.1 0.18641
1647 GADD45A Growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, α −1.3 0.00575
4616 GADD45B Growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, β −1 0.04625
4436 MSH2 MutS homolog 2, colon cancer, non-polyposis type 1 (E. coli) −1.8 0.00060
1019 CDK4 Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 1.1 0.00075

Cell proliferation

MVN-induced inhibition of cell proliferation was observed in MCF-7 cells. Specifically, MVN inhibited HMG-CoA reductase and farnesyl pyrophosphate transferase, which reduced the biosynthesis of isoprenoids such as FPP and GGPP, crucial intermediates in cell signaling, and differentiation and proliferation. These results provide evidence that statins may have beneficial effects by increasing NOS expression and activity during the atherosclerotic process. MVN altered the transcript abundance of the Rho and RAP family of small GTPases that function as signal transduction, actin skeleton and cell shape factors. Overexpression was associated with cell proliferation and metastasis (Table II).

Table II.

The gene list showing the fold-change of cell growth and proliferation-related genes.

Entrez code Gene symbol Gene name Fold-change P-value
5111 PCNA Proliferating cell nuclear antigen −1.1 0.13414
2099 ESR1 Estrogen receptor 1 −1 0.00008
3485 IGFBP2 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2, 36 kDa 1.1 0.00005
3488 IGFBP5 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 −1.1 0.02736
1956 EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor [erythroblastic leukemia viral (v-erb-b) oncogene] −1 0.04490
2260 FGFR1 Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 −1 0.80737
11116 FGFR1OP FGFR1 oncogene partner −1.3 0.00248
7048 TGFBR2 Transforming growth factor, β receptor II (70/80 kDa) −1.1 0.01276
54509 RHOF Ras homolog gene family, member F (in filopodia) 1.3 0.13142
391 RHOG Ras homolog gene family, member G (Rho G) 1.3 0.01589
29984 RHOD Ras homolog gene family, member D 1.3 0.00112
5911 RAP2A RAP2A, member of RAS oncogene family −1.6 0.00088
5912 RAP2B RAP2B, member of RAS oncogene family −1.2 0.03266
3156 HMGCR 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase −1 0.0259
2339 FNTA Farnesyltransferase, CAAX box, α −1.4 0.00179
2342 FNTB Farnesyltransferase, CAAX box, β 1.1 0.23093

Cellular metabolism

MVN treatment altered the transcript abundance-encoding proteins involved in the regulation of metabolic processes such as pentose-phosphate shunt; 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, 6-phosphogluconolactonase, phosphopentoseisomerase; glycolysis: phosphatetrioseisomerase, glyceratephosphomutase, dihydrolipyllysine residue acetyltransferase; fatty acid biosynthesis enzyme-encoding transcripts were reduced in transcript abundances including; hydrolase, lipoyl synthase, fatty acid synthase, acetyl Co-A carboxylase and acyl carrier protein. Transcripts encoding the tricarboxylic acid cycle; succinate dehydrogenase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, pyruvate carboxylase and ATP citrate lyase, responsible for the synthesis of cytosolic acetyl-CoA were also reduced (Table III).

Table III.

The gene list showing the fold-change of cellular metabolism-related genes.

Entrez code Gene symbol Gene name Fold-change P-value
5226 PGD Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase 1.5 0.00000
6120 RPE Ribulose-5-phosphate-3-epimerase −1.5 0.00002
22934 RPIA Ribose 5-phosphate isomerase A −1.2 0.00570
25796 PGLS 6-Phosphogluconolactonase 1.4 0.00000
192111 PGAM5 Phosphoglyceratemutase family member 5 1.4 0.48600
7167 TPI1 Triosephosphateisomerase 1 1.2 0.00091
1737 DLAT Dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase −1.3 0.00184
11019 LIAS Lipoic acid synthase −1.2 0.10000
2194 FASN Fatty acid synthase 1.2 0.00983
6389 SDHA Succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit A, flavoprotein (Fp) 1.2 0.04940
3418 IDH2 Isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (NADP+), mitochondrial 1.4 0.02310
3420 IDH3B Isocitrate dehydrogenase 3 (NAD+) β 1.2 0.00194

MVN-induced oxidative stress and ROS generation

The transcript abundances of NADPH oxidase, peroxidase, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase were increased, while the expression of superoxide dismutase was downregulated (an antioxidant enzyme) (Table IV).

Table IV.

The gene showing the fold change of ROS-related genes.

Entrez code Gene symbol Gene name Fold-change P-value
10811 NOXA1 NADPH oxidase activator 1 1.2 0.17500
2877 GPX2 Glutathione peroxidase 2 (gastrointestinal) 1.2 0.00675
2878 GPX3 Glutathione peroxidase 3 (plasma) 1.3 0.00412
2879 GPX4 Glutathione peroxidase 4 (phospholipid hydroperoxidase) 1.3 0.00001
2936 GSR Glutathione reductase 1.1 0.00961
6647 SOD1 Superoxide dismutase 1, soluble −1.1 0.00003
4842 NOS1 Nitric oxide synthase 1 (neuronal) 1.2 0.88300
51070 NOSIP Nitric oxide synthase interacting protein 1.1 0.26400

ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Apoptosis and cell death

MVN treatment was accompanied by the loss of cell viability. Functional clustering facilitated the identification and subsequent inclusion of a large group of proteins associated with apoptosis signaling. This group included tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family members, TNFR (fas), and TNFRAP (TRADD) activated by stress. In addition, the transcript abundance of p53 was increased. The p53 protein was involved in tumor suppression and was activated as a transcription factor in response to oncogene activation, hypoxia and DNA damage, resulting in growth arrest and/or apoptosis. Akt and MDM2 were decreased in abundance. Interaction of these proteins was central to p53 regulation. Several oncogenes were increased in transcript abundance including Chk2, ATM, Ras and Raf. MVN also altered the transcript abundance of pro-apoptotic genes (BAX, NOXA, BID, APAF-1), and the transcript abundance of antiapoptotic proteins, (Bcl-2, Bcl-XL and AIP or surviving). MVN increased the transcript abundance of cytochrome c. Transcript abundances of P38 and MAPK were increased likely due to the transduction of extra cellular signals and stress. CycD (regulator for CDK4 and CDK6) and Cyc, a transporter for organic ion, were increased in transcript abundance. Caspase-8 and -9 were increased in transcript abundance (Table V).

Table V.

The gene list showing the fold-change of apoptosis-related genes.

Entrez code Gene symbol Gene name Fold-change P-value
7157 TP53 Tumor protein p53 1.4 0.01360
596 BCL2 B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 −1.3 0.20900
9530 BAG4 BCL2-associated athanogene 4 −1.3 0.00322
7132 TNFRSF1A Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 1A 1.2 0.51300
51330 TNFRSF12A Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 12A 1.2 0.00040
8795 TNFRSF10B Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 10b 1.1 0.04220
4982 TNFRSF11B Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11b −1.3 0.00413
7128 TNFAIP3 Tumor necrosis factor, α-induced protein 3 −1.4 0.96500
84231 TRAF7 TNF receptor-associated factor 7 1.2 0.00033
9531 BAG3 BCL2-associated athanogene 3 1.1 0.00182
663 BNIP2 BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa interacting protein 2 −1.4 0.00448
1613 DAPK3 Death-associated protein kinase 3 1.1 0.24500
5134 PDCD2 Programmed cell death 2 −1 0.00509
11235 PDCD10 Programmed cell death 10 −1.7 0.00005
27250 PDCD4 Programmed cell death 4 (neoplastic transformation inhibitor) 1.3 0.00146
4791 NFKB2 Nuclear factor of κ light polypeptide gene
Enhancer in B-cells 2 (p49/p100)
1.1 0.04780
208 AKT2 V-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 2 1.2 0.01400
64400 AKTIP AKT-interacting protein −1 0.00130
4193 MDM2 Mdm2 p53 binding protein homolog (mouse) −1.1 0.04520
23300 ATMIN ATM interactor −1 0.00038
472 ATM Ataxia telangiectasia mutated 1 0.06510
22821 RASA3 RAS p21 protein activator 3 −1 0.72500
83593 RASSF5 Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 5 1.1 0.69500
51285 RASL12 RAS-like, family 12 −1 0.03010
158747 MOSPD2 Motile sperm domain containing 2 −1.8 0.00022
1111 CHEK1 CHK1 checkpoint homolog (S. pombe) 1.2 0.01450
5286 PIK3C2A Phosphoinositide-3-kinase, class 2, α polypeptide −1.8 0.04410
8649 MAPKSP1 MAPK scaffold protein 1 −1.2 0.03410
5594 MAPK1 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 −1.1 0.10000
5595 MAPK3 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 1.3 0.00031
5601 MAPK9 Mitogen-activated protein kinase 9 1.1 0.00438
5728 PTEN Phosphatase and tensin homolog −1.4 0.00057
638 BIK BCL2-interacting killer (apoptosis-inducing) 1.2 0.12700
53335 BCL11A B-cell CLL/lymphoma 11A (zinc finger protein) −1 0.31100
329 BIRC2 Baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 2 −1.4 0.00026
317 APAF1 Apoptotic peptidase activating factor 1 1.1 0.57200
1537 CYC1 Cytochrome c-1 1.3 0.00097
823 CAPN1 Calpain 1, (mu/I) large subunit 1.3 0.00552
841 CASP8 Caspase-8, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase 1.1 0.03120
837 CASP4 Caspase-4, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase 1 0.50200
836 CASP3 Caspase-3, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase −1.1 0.96700
835 CASP2 Caspase-2, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase 1.1 0.15100
2021 ENDOG Endonuclease G 1.4 0.00000
842 CASP9 Caspase-9, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase 1.2 0.00003
839 CASP6 Caspase-6, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase −1.1 0.01460

The significance of statins in preventing various types of cancer has been previously reported (18). Cholesterol and its draft is crucial for cell membrane stability and the synthesis of steroid hormones. Biomedical studies in the last two decades have demonstrated the influence of MVN and cholesterol metabolites on cell proliferation and growth. Increasingly, the geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, another important mevalonate pathway product, is affected by statins and its targets Rho and Rac (small guanosine 5′-triphosphate binding proteins associated with Ras statins). This mevalonate pathway appears to be an important key in tumor apoptosis (19,20).

Steroidogenesis and cholesterol transport were suggested to be essential for the growth and proliferation of tumor cells (21). Steroidogenesis inhibition and the disruption of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate-dependent survival pathways were attributed to the anti-proliferative effects of simvastatin, another HMGCo-A reductase inhibitor (22). Additionally, the association between the statins in general and the low incidence of carcinogenesis supported this hypothesis (11). Interference with the mevalonate pathway (prenylation) was known with its complexity to affect several apoptotic signaling pathways (19). Furthermore, MVN and other statins affect cell viability via mixed apoptotic and necrotic pathways at the same time (20). The efficacy of MVN against MCF-7 may be partly attributed to the multiplicity of its target signaling pathways (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Schematic diagram summarizing the effects of MVN on signaling pathways as found in the present study. Blue, significantly reduced transcript abundances. Red, increased transcript abundances. Red arrows, induction effects in protein expression or activity. Dotted arrows, inhibitory effects. MVN, mevinolin; TNFR, tumor necrosis factor receptor; TNFRAP, TNFR adaptor protein; P53, tumor suppressor protein p53; Casp7, 8 and 9, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidases 7, 8 and 9; MDM2, p53 binding protein homolog; BCL2, B-cell cell/lymphoma 2; Bim, BCL2-like 11 (apoptosis facilitator); ENDOG, endonuclease G; Cyt c, cytochrome c.

The safety profile of MVN in the experimental and clinical stages were encouraging for further clinical trials for the treatment of various types of tumors. The dose of MVN suggested for anti-cancer treatments was believed to be clinically safe (6,7). Therefore, extremely high doses of MVN administered every 4 h to patients are considered tolerable (19). Consequently, MVN and other natural statins may be an improved treatment option for cancer as compared to synthetic statins (23).

MVN treatments inhibited DNA repair machinery, mRNA processing, translation and DNA recombination and induced cell cycle arrest. An increase in transcript abundances of GST (glutathione S-transferase) was observed. Although GST-Pi showed no significant alteration, it was active in the detoxification of ROS-induced damage. Increased NO levels and NOS were involved in generating oxidative stress. Cancer cells were more sensitive than normal cells to the effects of MVN on the transcript abundance of HMG-CoA reductase. HMG CoA reductase is able to alter some key cellular processes, inducing the multi-factorial stress caused by MVN.

The microarray results, showed that the physiological activity of MVN on apoptosis induction can be ascribed, not only to the p53 pathway, but also to additional mechanisms. Therefore, we undertook gene expression analysis using microarray. Apoptosis has received attention as a major mechanism of cell death in normal as well as tumor cells. However, programmed cell death may be interrupted due to defective signaling pathways in tumor cells with higher rates of mutation (24). Defective apoptosis has been reflected in the cell resistance to apoptotic-inducing agents and, consequently, treatment failure. In addition, caspase-3 activity was measured and the results indicated that in the cancer cells treated with MVN the activity of caspase-3 was significantly increased. These findings were supported by transcript abundance analyses. Investigations from our group have previously shown that the apoptotic process in MVN-treated cells is mediated by differential transcript abundances, which is controlled by multi-factorial changes (17). In this context, we conducted qPCR analysis of apoptosis-related genes in MVN-treated MCF-7 cells. Notably, the transcript abundances of a pro-apoptotic gene (BAX), an anti-apoptotic gene (Bcl2) and the key gene of apoptosis (p53) were quantified using the qPCR technique in MCF-7 cells treated for 72 h with the IC50 of the cytotoxic drug DOX or MVN (17). It was found that there was increased BcL2 but decreased BAX transcript abundance. By contrast, MVN treatment did not change the transcript abundance of BAX, but decreased the BcL2 transcript abundance. Consequently, the p53 encoding transcript was increased in MVN-treated cells. In addition, MVN-treated cells were altered by oncogene expression, DNA damage, ROS generation or other forms of stress (16).

MVN has been suggested to induce cell death via multiple apoptotic (14), necrotic (20) and autophagic pathways (15). MCF-7 seemed to undergo apoptosis via the p53-dependent pathway. That finding is in concordance with that of a previous study by Lee and coworkers (25) who demonstrated ameliorated cytotoxic effects of simvastatin in p53 knockdown clones of HCT116 colon cancer cell lines (23). Similarly, the cytotoxic effects of MVN have been found in more than one cancer cell line and were p53-independent in nature (26,27). This may also explain the ability of MVN to overcome K-Ras mutation in human non-small lung cancer (16). Additionally, Freed-Pastor and colleagues (28) studied the effects of mutated p53 on breast cancer cells. They showed that depletion of the mutated form of p53 reverses the oncogenic potential of breast cancer cell lines by inducing a normal-like phenotype characterized by the formation of acini-like structures.

In conclusion, MVN-induced antineoplastic effects against breast cancer cells were identified to be multi-factorial, possibly involving several regulatory pathways. The findings of the present study clearly support the potential use of MVN as a natural, safe and cost-effective anticancer drug compared to other traditional benchmarked chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, pre-clinical trials are fundamentally important to further investigate the selectivity of MVN and whether side effects may be present in healthy neoplasm-free cells. Furthermore, MVN efficacy and therapeutic potential may be maximized if this potential could be specifically delivered to the tumor mass.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Alliance for Research on North Africa (ARENA) center at Tsukuba University for hosting Ali M. Mahmoud and we would like to thank Mr. Abdel-Hay G. Abu-Hussein, Cairo University Research Park, Cairo University, and Dr Sonya Tsolmon, ARENA Centre, University of Tsukuba, for their technical support. This study was financially supported by the Japan Society of Promotion of Science (JSPS) via the Asia-Africa Science-Platform Program and by King Saud University Vice Deanship of Research Chairs.

References

  • 1.El-Shemy HA, Aboul-Enein AM, Aboul-Enein KM, Fujita K. Willow leaves' extracts contain anti-tumor agents effective against three cell types. PLoS One. 2007;2:e178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nassr-Allah AA, Aboul-Enein AM, Aboul-Enein KM, Lightfoot DA, Cocchetto A, El-Shemy HA. Anti-cancer and anti-oxidant activity of some Egyptian medicinal plants. J Med Plants Res. 2009;3:799–808. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hong MY, Seeram NP, Zhang Y, Heber D. Anticancer effects of Chinese red yeast rice versus monacolin K alone on colon cancer cells. J Nutr Biochem. 2008;19:448–458. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2007.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kumari HPM, Naidu KA, Vishwanatha S, Narasimhamurthy K, Vijayalakshmi G. Safety evaluation of Monascus purpureus red mould rice in albino rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009;47:1739–1746. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.04.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Folkers K, Langsjoen P, Willis R, Richardson P, Xia LJ, Ye CQ, Tamagawa H. Lovastatin decreases coenzyme Q levels in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:8931–8934. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.22.8931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang L, Wang Y, Lv TJ, Zhou LQ, Jin J. Effects of clinically effective dose of lovastatin on prostate cancer PC3 cells. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010;42:391–395. (In Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yao CJ, Lai GM, Chan CF, Cheng AL, Yang YY, Chuang SE. Dramatic synergistic anticancer effect of clinically achievable doses of lovastatin and troglitazone. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:773–779. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shannon J, Tewoderos S, Garzotto M, Beer TM, Derenick R, Palma A, Farris PE. Statins and prostate cancer risk: a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:318–325. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hamilton RJ, Banez LL, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Platz EA, Kane CJ, Presti JC, Jr, Amling CL, Freedland SJ. Statin medication use and the risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) Database. Cancer. 2010;116:3389–3398. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Self TH, Akins D. Dramatic reduction in lipoma associated with statin therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(Suppl 2):S30–S31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.08.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Farwell WR, Scranton RE, Lawler EV, Lew RA, Brophy MT, Fiore LD, Gaziano JM. The association between statins and cancer incidence in a veterans population. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:134–139. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Riganti C, Doublier S, Costamagna C, Aldieri E, Pescarmona G, Ghigo D, Bosia A. Activation of nuclear factor-kappa B pathway by simvastatin and RhoA silencing increases doxorubicin cytotoxicity in human colon cancer HT29 cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74:476–484. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.045286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Perchellet JP, Perchellet EM, Crow KR, Buszek KR, Brown N, Ellappan S, Gao G, Luo D, Minatoya M, Lushington GH. Novel synthetic inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl- coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase activity that inhibit tumor cell proliferation and are structurally unrelated to existing statins. Int J Mol Med. 2009;24:633–643. doi: 10.3892/ijmm_00000274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Klawitter J, Shokati T, Moll V, Christians U, Klawitter J. Effects of lovastatin on breast cancer cells: A proteo-metabonomic study. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12:R16. doi: 10.1186/bcr2485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sane KM, Mynderse M, Lalonde DT, Dean IS, Wojtkowiak JW, Fouad F, Borch RF, Reiners JJ, Jr, Gibbs RA, Mattingly RR. A novel geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitor in combination with lovastatin inhibits proliferation and induces autophagy in STS-26T MPNST cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;333:23–33. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.160192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Park IH, Kim JY, Jung JI, Han JY. Lovastatin overcomes gefitinib resistance in human non-small cell lung cancer cells with K-Ras mutations. Invest New Drugs. 2010;28:791–799. doi: 10.1007/s10637-009-9319-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mahmoud AM, Al-Abd AM, Lightfoot DA, El-Shemy HA. Anti-cancer characteristics of mevinolin against three different solid tumor cell lines was not solely p53-dependent. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2012;27:673–679. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2011.607446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boudreau DM, Gardner JS, Malone KE, Heckbert SR, Blough DK, Daling JR. The association between 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl conenzyme A inhibitor use and breast carcinoma risk among postmenopausal women: A case-control study. Cancer. 2004;100:2308–2316. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mo H, Elson CE. Studies of the isoprenoid-mediated inhibition of mevalonate synthesis applied to cancer chemotherapy and chemoprevention. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2004;229:567–585. doi: 10.1177/153537020422900701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sánchez CA, Rodríguez E, Varela E, Zapata E, Páez A, Massó FA, Montaño LF, Lóopez-Marure R. Statin-induced inhibition of MCF-7 breast cancer cell proliferation is related to cell cycle arrest and apoptotic and necrotic cell death mediated by an enhanced oxidative stress. Cancer Invest. 2008;26:698–707. doi: 10.1080/07357900701874658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hong MY, Seeram NP, Zhang Y, Heber D. Chinese red yeast rice versus lovastatin effects on prostate cancer cells with and without androgen receptor overexpression. J Med Food. 2008;11:657–666. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2007.0702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fuchs D, Berges C, Opelz G, Daniel V, Naujokat C. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin overcomes bortezomib-induced apoptosis resistance by disrupting a geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate-dependent survival pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;374:309–314. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ahn KS, Sethi G, Aggarwal BB. Reversal of chemoresistance and enhancement of apoptosis by statins through down-regulation of the NF-kappaB pathway. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75:907–913. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tomiyama N, Matzno S, Kitada C, Nishiguchi E, Okamura N, Matsuyama K. The possibility of simvastatin as a chemotherapeutic agent for all-trans retinoic acid-resistant promyelocytic leukemia. Biol Pharm Bull. 2008;31:369–374. doi: 10.1248/bpb.31.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee SK, Kim YC, Song SB, Kim YS. Stabilization and translocation of p53 to mitochondria is linked to Bax translocation to mitochondria in simvastatin-induced apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;391:1592–1597. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.12.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Milkevitch M, Jeitner TM, Beardsley NJ, Delikatny EJ. Lovastatin enhances phenylbutyrate-induced MR-visible glycerophosphocholine but not apoptosis in DU145 prostate cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1771:1166–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2007.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Martirosyan A, Clendening JW, Goard CA, Penn LZ. Lovastatin induces apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells and synergizes with doxorubicin: Potential therapeutic relevance. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Freed-Pastor WA, Mizuno H, Zhao X, Langerød A, Moon SH, Rodriguez-Barrueco R, Barsotti A, Chicas A, Li W, Polotskaia A, et al. Mutant p53 disrupts mammary tissue architecture via the mevalonate pathway. Cell. 2012;148:244–258. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Oncology are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES