To the Editor—We thank Sachdev et al for their interest in and evaluation of our article [1]. The respondents present data from a survey of providers in metropolitan areas with the highest human immunodeficiency virus incidence, and their results complement and support our findings. Unlike our article, which specifically surveyed infectious disease physicians, the respondents captured responses from primary care providers. Their results demonstrate that provider self-efficacy and normative beliefs about preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) were associated with intention to prescribe PrEP. These data build on our findings that complex and multiple barriers exist to the provision of PrEP among both infectious disease specialists and primary care providers. In addition, their work supports our conclusion that multifaceted approaches will likely be necessary to the successful provision of real-world PrEP.
Notes
Financial support. P. M. P. has received institutional grant support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts.
All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Reference
- 1.Karris MY, Beekmann SE, Mehta SR, Anderson CM, Polgreen PM. Are we prepped for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP)? Provider opinions on the real-world use of PrEP in the United States and Canada. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:704–12. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]