Abstract
Complicated Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (OWCL) and Old World mucosal leishmaniasis (OWML) constitute an indication for systemic treatment. To date, there no controlled clinical studies that compare treatment options for these diseases. We compiled a case series of 24 cases successfully treated with miltefosine. We conclude that oral miltefosine is an effective treatment option for both OWCL and OWML.
Keywords: complicated cutaneous leishmaniasis, miltefosine, mucosal leishmaniasis, Old World leishmaniasis, systemic treatment
Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (OWCL) varies widely in its cutaneous presentation, ranging from a single limited skin lesion that may heal spontaneously to large and multiple locally destructive forms, as well as rare cases presenting with mucosal involvement (Old World mucosal leishmaniasis [OWML]). The kind of treatment depends on the clinical aspect of the lesion and the infecting species [1]. Antiparasitic treatment may be omitted in uncomplicated cases of OWCL caused by Leishmania major, because these infections are usually characterized by a benign, self-limiting course with spontaneous healing. In most other cases, local treatments such as intralesional pentavalent antimonials in combination with cryotherapy, topical paromomycin, or thermotherapy are indicated.
Systemic treatment is recommended in patients with complicated OWCL (defined as more than 3 lesions; lesions with diameters >30 mm; lesions in anatomic locations unsuitable for local treatment; and/or lesions refractory to local therapy) and in patients with OWML [1, 2].
The available drugs for systemic treatment are parenterally administered pentavalent antimonials (ie, meglumine antimoniate and sodium stibogluconate), parenterally administered (preferentially liposomal) amphotericin B and oral fluconazole, and miltefosine. In the absence of controlled clinical studies comparing the efficacy of these 4 compounds, preference for a specific treatment regimen is currently mainly guided by personal experience of the treating physician and practical considerations, such as drug availability and costs.
Miltefosine is the newest of the 4 drugs and is distinguished by 4 characteristics: (1) the often prohibitive cost of the drug; (2) the advantage of oral administration; (3) the teratogenic potential of the drug, demanding contraceptive measures during treatment; and (4) due to the more recent market introduction, a limited amount of clinical data. We describe 7 cases of complicated OWCL and OWML successfully treated with miltefosine at our institution and 17 cases published in the literature.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched the internal medical records at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute for cases of complicated OWCL and OWML that were treated with miltefosine, and we performed a systematic PubMed (MEDLINE) literature search using the key words “cutaneous leishmaniasis”, “mucosal leishmaniasis”, and “miltefosine”, including articles in English, French, German, and Spanish published before July 2015. In addition, the references of the identified case reports were screened for similar cases that may have been missed by the applied search approach.
RESULTS
By reviewing the internal medical records at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute and systematically reviewing the available published literature, we identified 17 cases of OWCL and 7 cases of OWML that received miltefosine treatment. Table 1 depicts the parasitological and clinical characteristics of these 24 cases. Seven of the cases were treated at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute between 2007 and 2015 (including 3 cases that have been described previously [3–5]), and 17 cases were identified by the performed literature search.
Table 1.
Reference | Age/Sex | Species (Most Likely Place of Infection) | Description | Indication | Miltefosine Regimen | Outcome (Follow up) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient 1 | 15/F | Leishmania major (Morocco) | Lesions on face, arms, and right leg | Location and number | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (9 mo) |
Patient 2 | 25/F | L major (Turmenistan) | 5.5 × 6 cm lesion on the left thigh | Size | 50 mg TID for 26 d | Clinical cure (1 y) |
Patient 3 | 26/M | L major (Sudan) | Lesions on the penis, abdomen, and left elbow | Location and number | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (9 mo) |
Patient 4 | 24/M | Leishmania donovani (Spain/Italy) | 5 × 5 cm lesion on the forehead | Location | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (2 y) |
Patient 5 [3] | 64/F | Leishmania infantum (unknown) | Buccal lesions | ML | 50 mg TID for 30 d | Clinical cure (1 y) |
Patient 6 [5] | 50/M | Leishmania aethiopica (Egypt?) | Multiple lesions at both auricles, underlying ankylosing spondylitis treated with etanercept | Location | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (4 y) |
Patient 7 [4] | 76/M | L infantum (Italy) | Relapsing lesion on the tongue, underlying Good Syndrome | ML | 50 mg TID for 28 d | 5× clinical cure, 4× relapsea |
Schraner 2005 [11] | 43/M | L major (Burkina Faso) | Disseminated CL, underlying HIV-1 infection, CD4 cell count 10 cells/µL, HIV load 152 428 copies/mL | Number of lesions and failure to prior treatment | 50 mg BID for 18 mo | Clinical cure (2 y) |
Stojkovic 2007 [12] | 26/M | L major (Tunesia) | Seven lesions on both arms (5 cm) | Size and number | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (no data) |
Neub 2008 [13] | 1/F | L infantum (Mallorca) | Lesion on the nose | Location | 10 mg OD for 28 d | Clinical cure (6 mo) |
Mueller 2009 [14] | 31/M | L infantum (Mallorca) | 10 cm lesion on the right knee, underlying ankylosing spondylitis treated with infliximab | Size | 50 mg BID for 6 wk | Clinical cure, 1 relapse after 1 y |
Killingley 2009 [15] | 12/M | Leishmania tropica (Afghanistan) | 5 cm lesion, intolerance to local pentavalent antimony | Size | 50 mg BID for 28 d | Clinical cure (5 mo) |
Killingley 2009 [15] | 19/M | L tropica (Afghanistan) | Multiple lesions including ear | Location | 50 mg BID for 28 d | Clinical cure (3 mo) |
Faber 2009 [16] | 52/F | L donovani (Portugal) | Nodule on the left cheek with locoregional lymphadenopathy | Location | 50 mg TID for 32 d | Clinical cure (6 mo) |
Tappe 2010 [17] | ?/F | L tropica (Afghanistan) | No data | No data | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (4 mo) |
Dorlo 2011 [18] | 53/F | L major (Morocco) | 15 lesions on the face and trunk | Number and location | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (6 mo) |
Dorlo 2011 [18] | 54/M | L infantum (Spain) | Disfiguring lesion on the nose | Location | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (7 mo) |
Richter 2011 [19] | 67/F | L infantum (Mallorca) | Buccal lesion, underlying systemic lupus erythematosus | ML | 50 mg TID for 6 wk | Clinical cure (30 mo) |
Poeppl 2011 [20] | 59/F | L donovani/ infantum (Cyprus) | 5 × 7 cm swelling on the right cheek | Location and size | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (2 y) |
Ehlert 2013 [21] | 50/M | L donovani/ infantum (Spain) | Buccal lesion, underlying HIV infection, CD4 cell count 276 cells/μL, HIV load 300 copies/mL | ML | 50 mg TID for 21 d with AmphB | Clinical cure (no data) |
Kassam 2013 [22] | 66/M | L donovani (unknown) | Lingual lesion, use of corticosteroid inhaler for chronic obstructive airways disease | ML | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (10 mo) |
Salam 2013 [23] | 40/M | L donovani (India) | Post-kala azar dermal leishmaniasis with mucosal involvement | ML | 50 mg BID for 3 m | Clinical cure (no data) |
Neumayr 2013 [24] | 59/M | L infantum (Mallorca) | 4 cm lesion, psoriatic arthritis treated with methotrexate | Size | 50 mg BID for 28 d | Clinical cure (no data) |
Neumayr 2013 [24] | 53/M | L infantum (Mallorca) | Nasal lesion, psoriatic arthritis treated with adalimumab | ML | 50 mg TID for 28 d | Clinical cure (no data) |
Abbreviations: AmphB, amphotericin B; BID, twice a day; CL, cutaneous leishmaniasis; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ML, mucosal leishmaniasis; OD, once a day; TID, 3 times a day.
a The relapses in 2007, 2010, and 2012 were treated with miltefosine.
The indications for systemic treatment were either mucosal leishmaniasis (n = 7), an anatomic location unsuitable for local treatment (mostly in the face; n = 10), multiple lesions (n = 6), or large lesions (n = 5). The indication for systemic treatment remained unclear in 1 patient, and in 5 patients more than 1 indication for systemic treatment was present.
All 24 cases completed the treatment course and demonstrated healing on clinical evaluation. Follow-up data were available for 19 of 24 patients (see Table 1). In 2 patients with persisting immunosuppression relapses occurred.
DISCUSSION
Systemic treatment is indicated in clearly defined cases of Old World tegumentary leishmaniasis ([1,2]). The advantages and disadvantages of 4 possible drugs are as follows. (1) The first drug is pentavalent antimonials. In OWCL, the efficacy of systemic pentavalent antimony is poorly documented. Pentavalent antimonial (20 mg/kg for 10–14 days) achieved modest cure rates in L major cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) ranging from only 52% to 87% at 3 weeks, and in 1 study it was not superior to placebo [1]. For Leishmania tropica CL, the cure rates were even lower and ranged from 41% to 55% [1], but rates were not studied for Leishmania infantum/Leishmania donovani CL. Considering such low efficacy and high toxicity, pentavalent antimonials are no longer the first-line treatment for complicated OWCL and OWML. (2) The second drug, liposomal amphotericin B (3 mg/kg per day for 5 consecutive days and at day 10, with a total dose of 18 mg/kg), had a cure rate of 84% in 13 travelers and immigrants with L tropica CL [6]. Considering such good efficacy, although data are scare and the cost is high, it might be considered as a first-line treatment. (3) The third drug is fluconazole. Because previously described promising results of treatment with fluconazole (200 mg daily for 6 weeks) could not be reproduced, and higher doses of the drug led to significantly higher adverse events, fluconazole should only be considered as a third-line treatment of complicated OWCL [7]. (4) The fourth drug is miltefosine. In 3 treatment studies of L major that included a total of 81 patients, CL cure rates of miltefosine (150 mg daily for 28 days) had a mean of 93% (range, 87%–100%) [8–10]. For L tropica and L infantum/L donovani CL, experience with miltefosine is limited to a small number of case reports.
We compiled a case series of 24 cases of complicated OWCL (n = 17) and OWML that were treated with miltefosine. All 24 cases responded favorable to miltefosine treatment and showed clinical cure. The completion of the treatment course by all 24 patients reflects the overall good tolerability of miltefosine. Although relapses occurred in 2 patients with persistent immunosuppression, no relapses were observed among immunocompetent patients over a median follow-up time of 10 months (range, 3–48 months). Therefore, miltefosine seems to have excellent efficacy in immunocompetent patients suffering from complicated OWCL and OWML. Immunocompromised patients are at risk of sustaining relapse, irrespective of the specific treatment applied: 1 of the 2 relapsing patients suffered from “Good syndrome” (a rare cause of combined B- and T-cell immunodeficiency in adults) and even sustained multiple relapses irrespective of several rounds of treatment with different regimens. Because immunosuppression in this patient was persistent, the patient was finally put on indefinite secondary prophylaxis with monthly meglumine antimoniate and no further relapse was observed until his death, which was unrelated to leishmaniasis. In the other patient who relapsed, the infliximab therapy for ankylosing spondylitis had been resumed. The limitations of this study are its retrospective design, a possible publication bias of the reported cases, and the small number of patients included in the study.
CONCLUSIONS
Complicated Old World CL and OWML constitute an indication for systemic treatment. Systematic studies of systemic treatment of OWCL and OWML are scarce, and conclusions for practical decisions are based on case reports and case series. Because pentavalent antimonials are relatively toxic and show limited cure rates and fluconazole has questionable efficacy, liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine seem to be viable and promising treatment options for complicated OWCL and OWML. Because of easy oral administration, the overall good tolerability, and the promising results, miltefosine may be considered as a first-line treatment for complicated OWCL and OWML.
Acknowledgments
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.
References
- 1.Blum J, Buffet P, Visser L et al. . LeishMan recommendations for treatment of cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis in travelers, 2014. J Travel Med 2014; 21:116–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blum J, Lockwood DN, Visser L et al. . Local or systemic treatment for New World cutaneous leishmaniasis? Re-evaluating the evidence for the risk of mucosal leishmaniasis. Int Health 2012; 4:153–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Neumayr AL, Walter C, Stoeckle M et al. . Successful treatment of imported mucosal Leishmania infantum leishmaniasis with miltefosine after severe hypokalemia under meglumine antimoniate treatment. J Travel Med 2012; 19:124–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stoeckle M, Holbro A, Arnold A et al. . Treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (L. infantum) with miltefosine in a patient with Good syndrome. Acta Trop 2013; 128:168–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mosimann V, Neumayr A, Hatz C, Blum JA. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Switzerland: first experience with species-specific treatment. Infection 2013; 41:1177–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Solomon M, Pavlotsky F, Leshem E et al. . Liposomal amphotericin B treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania tropica. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011; 25:973–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Morizot G, Delgiudice P, Caumes E et al. . Healing of Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis in travelers treated with fluconazole: drug effect or spontaneous evolution? Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007; 76:48–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.van Thiel PP, Leenstra T, Kager PA, et al. Miltefosine treatment of Leishmania major infection: an observational study involving Dutch military personnel returning from northern Afghanistan. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50:80–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mohebali M, Fotouhi A, Hooshmand B et al. . Comparison of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) by a randomized clinical trial in Iran. Acta Trop 2007; 103:33–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rahman SB, ul Bari A, Mumtaz N. Miltefosine in cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2007; 17:132–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schraner C, Hasse B, Hasse U et al. . Successful treatment with miltefosine of disseminated cutaneous leishmaniasis in a severely immunocompromised patient infected with HIV-1. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:e120–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stojkovic M, Junghanss T, Krause E et al. . First case of typical Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis treated with miltefosine. Int J Dermatol 2007; 46:385–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Neub A, Krahl D, Stich A et al. . Cutaneous infection with Leishmania infantum in an infant treated successfully with miltefosine. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2008; 6:1061–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mueller MC, Fleischmann E, Grunke M et al. . Relapsing cutaneous leishmaniasis in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis treated with infliximab. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2009; 81:52–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Killingley B, Lamb LE, Davidson RN. Miltefosine to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania tropica. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2009; 103:171–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Faber WR, Wonders J, Jensema AJ et al. . Cutaneous leishmaniasis with lymphadenopathy due to Leishmania donovani. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009; 34:e196–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tappe D, Muller A, Stich A. Resolution of cutaneous old world and new world leishmaniasis after oral miltefosine treatment. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010; 82:1–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dorlo TP, van Thiel PP, Schoone GJ et al. . Dynamics of parasite clearance in cutaneous leishmaniasis patients treated with miltefosine. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011; 5:e1436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Richter J, Hanus I, Häussinger D et al. . Mucosal Leishmania infantum infection. Parasitol Res 2011; 109:959–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Poeppl W, Walochnik J, Pustelnik T et al. . Cutaneous leishmaniasis after travel to Cyprus and successful treatment with miltefosine. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2011; 84:562–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ehlert N, Seilmaier M, Guggemos W et al. . Severe oral mucositis in a patient with HIV infection. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2013; 138:1601–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kassam K, Davidson R, Tadrous PJ et al. . Lingual Leishmaniasis Presenting to Maxillofacial Surgery in UK with Successful Treatment with Miltefosine. Case Rep Med 2013; 2013:975131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Salam MA, Siddiqui MA, Nabi SG et al. . Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis with mucosal involvement: an unusual case presentation including successful treatment with miltefosine. J Health Popul Nutr 2013; 31:294–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Neumayr AL, Morizot G, Visser LG et al. . Clinical aspects and management of cutaneous leishmaniasis in rheumatoid patients treated with TNF-alpha antagonists. Travel Med Infect Dis 2013; 11:412–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]