Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with various factors, including immunological abnormalities and exposure to allergens. Astaxanthin (AST) is a xanthophyll carotenoid that has recently been demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory effects and to regulate the expression of inflammatory cytokines. Thus, we investigated whether AST could improve the dermatitis and pruritus in a murine model of AD using NC/Nga mice. In addition to a behavioral evaluation, the effects of AST on the AD were determined by the clinical skin severity score, serum IgE level, histological analyses of skin, and by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blotting analyses for the expression of inflammation-related factors. AST (100 mg/kg) or vehicle (olive oil) was orally administered once day and three times a week for 26 days. When compared with vehicle-treated group, the administration of AST significantly reduced the clinical skin severity score. In addition, the spontaneous scratching in AD model mice was reduced by AST administration. Moreover, the serum IgE level was markedly decreased by the oral administration of AST compared to that in vehicle-treated mice. The number of eosinophils, total and degranulated mast cells all significantly decreased in the skin of AST-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated mice. The mRNA and protein levels of eotaxin, MIF, IL-4, IL-5 and L-histidine decarboxylase were significantly decreased in the skin of AST-treated mice compared with vehicle-treated mice. These results suggest that AST improves the dermatitis and pruritus in AD via the regulation of the inflammatory effects and the expression of inflammatory cytokines.
Introduction
The skin is exposed to endogenous and environmental pro-oxidant agents, as a result, they cause the upregulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The resulting oxidative stress damages proteins, lipids and DNA. An imbalance between ROS and antioxidants can lead to an elevated oxidative stress level [1].
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with various factors, including immunological abnormalities and exposure to allergens that contribute to the pathogenesis and development of skin lesions. Some evidence indicates that oxidative stress is involved in the cutaneous damage in AD. Enhancement and attenuation of the antioxidant defenses have been shown to be associated with the amelioration and exacerbation of AD, respectively [2]. AD patients were more prone to damage caused by ROS or oxidants than controls. It was also reported that oxidative stress was involved in the pathophysiology of chronic AD without recent flare-ups [3]. Tsuboi et al. reported that adult patients with AD excreted significantly higher levels of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), an established marker of oxidative stress, in the urine compared with their corresponding controls [4]. High urinary levels of 8-OHdG in children with chronic AD were also reported [2]. The mean concentration of 8-OHdG was 1.6-fold higher in AD patients compared with healthy controls, and the use of anti-oxidants or nitric oxide (NO) pathway modulators have been considered as a potential therapeutic strategy [5]. Taken together, these findings indicate that enhanced oxidative stress can be particularly harmful for AD patients.
Astaxanthin (AST), 3,3’-dihydroxy-β-carotene-4,4’-dione, a carotenoid without vitamin A activity [6], has potential clinical applications due to its antioxidant activity, which is higher than that of β-carotene and α-tocopherol [6–8]. In addition, it has many highly potent pharmacological effects, including anti-tumor, anti-cancer, anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory activities [8–11]. AST has also been reported to inhibit the production of ROS, and protects bovine oviduct epithelial cells from NO-induced oxidative stress [12]. In addition, AST inhibits the production of inflammatory mediators by inhibiting the NF-kB signaling pathway [13, 14]. The topical administration of AST prevents ultraviolet (UV)-induced photokeratitis in mice by decreasing the oxidative stress in the irradiated corneas [15]. We also recently demonstrated that AST treatment decreases the iNOS expression and inhibits UV-induced apotosis in keratinocytes [16].
The present study was designed to investigate whether AST could be able to suppress the pruritus and decrease the skin severity of AD like lesions in a murine model of AD using NC/Nga mice.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
AST was provided by Fuji Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Toyama, Japan). The Isogen RNA extraction kit was obtained from Nippon Gene (Tokyo, Japan). M-MLV reverse transcriptase was purchased from GIBCO (Grand Island, NY). Ex-Taq DNATM polymerase was purchased from TaKaRa Bio (Shiga, Japan). The anti-MIF polyclonal antibody (pAb) was obtained from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN). The anti-eotaxin pAb and anti-IL-4 pAb were obtained from Abcam Ltd. (Cambridge, UK). The anti-L-histidine decarboxylase (HDC) pAb was obtained from Progen Biotechnik (Heidelberg, Germany). The anti-IL-5 pAb, anti-IFN-γ pAb and anti-β-actin pAb were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (CA). The Western blot detection system was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). The IgE ELISA kit was obtained from DS Pharma Biomedical Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). All other reagents were of analytical grade.
Mice
Male NC/Nga mice (eight weeks old at the start of the experiments: Japan SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) were used for the study. The induction of AD using mites was performed as described previously [17]. Mice were kept under controlled temperature (21–23°C) and humidity (45–65%) conditions. The room was lit from 07:00 to 19:00 hours. Food and water were provided ad libitum.
Ethics Statement
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Institute for animal experiments at University of Toyama. The protocol was approved by the committee on the ethics of animal experiments of University of Toyama.
Administration of AST
AST (100 mg/kg) or vehicle (olive oil) was orally administered three times a week for 26 days by gavage (oral zoned needle). Each group consisted of five mice.
Evaluation of the clinical skin severity score
Mice were observed and the skin conditions were scored. The total clinical severity for AD-like lesions was defined as the sum of the individual scores graded as 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe) for each of five signs and symptoms (itching, erythema, edema, excoriation/erosion and scaling/dryness) [17].
Behavioral evaluation
Scratching behavior was observed as described previously [18]. Briefly, the animals were placed individually in acrylic cages composed of four equal-sized cells (13×9×40 cm) for at least 1 hour for acclimation. Then, their behaviors were videotaped for 1 hour with personnel kept out of the observation room. Spontaneous scratching toward any rostral regions of the body by the hind paws was counted. As mice make several rapid scratching movements for periods of about 1 sec, a series of these movements was counted to be one bout of scratching [19].
Determination of the IgE level
Blood (20 μl) was collected from the hearts using a capillary glass tube under ether anesthesia, and was centrifuged at 4°C at 5,000 rpm for 20 min. The serum was kept at -80°C until it was assayed. The total IgE in the serum was determined with an ELISA kit.
Plasma sample preparation and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis
The AST content in the plasma and skin tissues was quantified using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Blood samples were treated with EDTA and citrate-theophylline-adenosine-dipyridamole (BD Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan) and centrifuged at 2,500×g for 30 minutes to obtain plasma and then stored at −80°C until HPLC measurement. Plasma treated with 5 mL of hexane/ether (8:2, v/v) was subjected to preparative HPLC, while the skin tissues were evaporated until dry and subsequently expressed with 3 mL of acetone and homogenized. The residue was filtered, and the solution was subjected to HPLC on a Shimadzu SPD-6AV spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) set at 470 nm. The column used was a Cosmosil 5SL-II column (4.6×250 nm, Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) with a mobile phase of acetone/hexane (2:8). A low rate was employed (1.0 ml/min). The AST content was quantified relative to calibration with that observed in a standard sample.
Histological analysis
Samples of the back skin of the mice (at 0 or 26 days) were fixed with 10% formalin in neutral buffered solution, torn into strips and embedded in paraffin. The sections of 2 μm thickness were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for eosinophils, or toluidine blue for mast cells. Sections were then observed to detect non-degranulated (S1A Fig) and degranulated (S1B Fig) status of mast cells. Cells were counted at a magnification of ×400 and were expressed as the total number of cells and degranulated mast cells in five fields in each mouse (five sections per mouse, five mice per group).
Reverse transcription-PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from each mouse skin sample. RNA reverse transcription was performed with M-MLV reverse transcriptase using random hexamer primers and subsequent amplification using Taq DNA polymerase. PCR was carried out for 35 cycles with denaturation at 98°C for 10 sec, annealing from 55°C for 30 sec and extension at 72°C for 1 min using a thermal cycler (PE Applied Biosystems Gene Amp PCR system 9700). The mouse MIF primers used in the present study were 5’-GTTTCTGTCGGAGCTCAC-3’ (55–72) (forward) and 5’-AGCGAAGGTGGAACC GTTCCA-3’ (215–236) (reverse). The eotaxin primers used were: 5’-CCAAGGACTTGGCTTCATGTAG-3’ (438–459) (forward) and 5’-ATTCTGGCTTGGCATGGTAGC-3’ (912–932) (reverse). The IL-4 primers used were: 5’-ACGGCACAGAGCTATTGATG-3’ (71–90) (forward) and 5’-ATGGTGGCTCAGTACTACGA-3’ (505–524) (reverse). The IL-5 primers used were: 5’-AGGATGCTTCTGCACTTGA-3’ (50–68) (forward), 5’-ACACCAAGGAACTCTTGCA-3’ (396–414) (reverse). The HDC primers used were: 5’-AGCACAAGCTGTCGTCCTTT-3’ (320–339) (forward) and 5’-GTGGATCACGAAGACCCTGT-3’ (514–533) (reverse). The IFN-γ primers used were: 5’-GCTCTG AGACAATGAACGCT-3’ (98–117) (forward) and 5’-AAAGAGATAATCTGGCTCTG C-3’ (306–326) (reverse). GAPDH was used as a positive control. The primers used to amplify GAPDH were: 5’-GAAGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG-3’ (6–28) (forward) and 5’-GTCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGC-3’ (949–971) (reverse). After PCR, the amplified products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Western blot analysis
The skin samples were lysed in RIPA buffer (1M Tris-HCA, 5M NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40 (v/v), 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.05% SDS, 1mM phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride) for 20 min. After brief sonication, the lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and the protein content in the supernatants was measured using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The protein lysates were denatured at 96°C for 5 min after mixing with 5 μL of sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) loading buffer, were applied on an SDS polyacrylamide gel for electrophoresis and were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. A Western blot analysis was carried out to detect the expression levels of eotaxin, MIF, IL-4, IL-5, IFN-γ and HDC using specific antibodies. Band signals were visualized on X-ray film using chemiluminescence ECL detection reagents (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). The relative amounts of proteins associated with specific antibodies were normalized according to the intensities of β-actin. The band density was quantified by a BIO-ID image analyzer, and the relative amounts of proteins associated with specific antibodies were normalized according to the intensities of β-actin.
Statistical analysis
The values are expressed as the means ± SD of the respective test or control group. The statistical significance of differences between the control and test groups was evaluated by either Student’s t-test, a two-way repeated measures ANOVA or Dunnett’s multiple comparison.
Results
AST treatment improved the AD symptoms in the NC/Nga mice
We first utilized the clinical severity scores to compare the AD-like skin lesions in the NC/Nga mice. On day 0, the skin severity scores of both groups of mice were similar. The skin severity scores of the AST-treated mice were significantly decreased at 26 days compared to the vehicle-treated mice (Vehicle: 9.0 ± 0.6, AST: 3.8 ± 0.7, *p<0.01) (Fig 1A).
AST treatment suppressed the scratching behavior and changed the plasma and skin concentrations of AST in the NC/Nga mice
We next investigated the effects of AST on the scratching behavior in NC mice. Fig 1B shows the number of spontaneous scratching bouts on the rostral part of the body with the hind paws in individual mice. A decrease in scratching behavior was observed after AST treatment, starting on day five and lasting until day 26, compared to that noted for vehicle treatment (*p<0.05, **p<0.01).
The concentration of AST in the plasma reached 49.0 ± 21.4 eight hours after the oral administration of AST and then decreased until 48 hours in a time-dependent manner. On the other hand, the concentrations of AST in the skin tissues remained elevated until 24 hours after the oral administration of AST (Fig 1C).
The effects of AST on the histological features of AD in the NC/Nga mice
The infiltration of inflammatory cells, including mast cells and eosinophils, are histopathological changes that occur in the skin lesions of NC/Nga mice [14]. Skin specimens from the lesions of AST- or vehicle-treated mice were collected on day 0 and after the completion of the 26-day observation period. The number of eosinophils was significantly decreased in the dermis of the AST-treated mice compared to the vehicle-treated mice (Vehicle: 3.1 ± 0.6, AST: 0.6 ± 0.5, *p<0.05) (Fig 2A and 2B). Moreover, we observed a significant decrease in the number of total and de-granulated mast cells in the dermis of the AST-treated mice compared with the skin in the vehicle-treated mice (total, Vehicle: 21.2 ± 3.1, AST: 7.9 ± 2.7, de-granulated, Vehicle: 11.3 ± 1.6, AST: 4.1 ± 1.7, *p<0.001) (Fig 2A and 2C).
AST treatment decreased the IgE level of NC/Nga mice
We investigated the effects of AST on the serum IgE levels of NC mice. The serum IgE levels were also significantly decreased in the mice treated with AST for 26 days compared to the vehicle-treated mice (*p<0.05) (Fig 2D).
Effects of AST on the expression and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and HDC in the skin of NC/Nga mice
We then examined the effects of AST on the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the HDC expression in the mouse skin. AST treatment decreased the mRNA expression levels of eotaxin, MIF, IL-4, IL-5 and HDC (Fig 3A). In addition, a Western blot analysis revealed that AST treatment decreased the production of these cytokines and HDC in the mouse skin (Fig 3B). However, the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β remain unchanged following AST treatment (S2 Fig).
Discussion
AD is a chronic or chronically relapsing inflammatory skin disease characterized by the presence of eczematous skin lesions with lichenification, pruritic excoriation, dry skin and susceptibility to skin infections [6]. Oxidative stress has been reported to play an important role in the pathophysiology and exacerbation of AD symptoms [2] and the use of antioxidants has been shown to be beneficial in protecting against the harmful effects of increased oxidative stress [16, 20].
AST is known to be a potent quencher of singlet oxygen and an efficient scavenger of superoxide anions. AST is expected to be a useful antioxidant for preventing oxidative stress, a causative factor in several diseases. Accordingly, in the present study, treatment with AST reduced the severity of skin irritation and improved the symptoms of dermatitis and pruritus in AD-model mice. In addition, AST has been reported to have beneficial effects (e.g. it inhibits the release of ROS) in the treatment of ischemic reperfusion injury [21] as well as neuroprotective effects in cases of Parkinson's disease [22] and preventive effects in cases of arteriosclerosis [23] and diabetic nephropathy [24]. Recently, our group demonstrated that the administration of AST induces a significant decrease in the protein content of inducible nitric oxide (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and inhibits the release of prostaglandin E2 from keratinocytes following ultraviolet irradation [16].
The skin inflammation observed in cases of AD is characterized histopathologically by the infiltration of T lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages, eosinophils and mast cells. Increased numbers of eosinophils are commonly seen in many allergic diseases, including AD. These cells infiltrate the dermis in response to allergens and subsequently secrete eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) [25], which mediates the migration of other immune cells into developing skin lesions [26]. Similarly, mast cells, which are activated due to allergen-crosslinked IgE, enhance the development of Th2 cells and induce the release of chemokines, cytokines and granular mediators that participate in the development of AD-like skin lesions [27, 28]. In the present study, AST treatment effectively decreased the number of eosinophils and suppressed the AD allergic response.
IgE production plays an important role in the pathogenesis of skin diseases, as high serum IgE levels mediate the critical clinical characteristics of AD. Specifically, IgE binds with mast cells, thus causing the release of inflammatory mediators, which correlates with the severity of AD [29]. In patients with AD, there is an increased number of IgE-bearing Langerhans cells in the epidermis, which appear to play a crucial role in presenting cutaneous allergens to Th2 cells and may promote a clinical situation in which scratching is a known prerequisite for the development of AD skin lesions [30]. Therefore, IgE is considered to be one of the most significant therapeutic targets in AD. The present results demonstrated that AST treatment significantly improves the itching behaviour in mice, possibly due to its suppressive effects on the serum IgE level, eosinophils numbers and mast cells degranulation. Moreover, pro-inflammatory cytokines are believed to be important contributors to the pathogenesis of skin inflammation in patients with AD, a process that may depend on the duration of the skin lesion. The onset of AD involves a systemic Th2 response associated with eosinophilia and marked infiltration of Th2 cells into the skin lesions. These infiltrating T cells predominantly express IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13. Recently, the roles of cytokines in the induction of migration and accumulation of eosinophils into inflamed tissues have been reported. Important eosinophil chemoattractant cytokines include IL-5 and eotaxin [31]. Eotaxin is reportedly related to the development of eosinophilia in patients with allergic diseases, including AD and asthma [32, 33]. IL-5 also has important roles in eosinophil production and differentiation [34]. In contrast, recently it has been reported that Th2-mediated immune response is not necessary for the development of AD-like skin disease in NC mice [35], however other cytokines and mediators might also play their role. Therefore, the detailed pathophysiological mechanisms of AD are not completely clear, the activation of inflammatory cells and dysregulation of cytokine production appears to be common and may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of AD [21]. Therefore, the targeted inhibition of inflammatory cytokine production has long been regarded to be a possible therapeutic strategy for improving the clinical outcomes of AD. Consistent with the reports discussed above, AST treatment decreased the expression levels of eotaxin, MIF, HDC and Th2-type cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-5, in a murine model of AD and protected against the development of AD symptoms by inhibiting the production of inflammatory cytokines in this study. Recently, our group also reported similar findings showing that treatment with AST results in a reduction in the UV-induced protein and mRNA expression levels of MIF, IL-1βand TNF-αin HaCaT keratinocytes. It was suggested that protects agains UV-induced inflammation by decreasing inflammatory cytokines, and thereby inhibiting the apoptosis of keratinocytes [16].
In conclusion, we herein demonstrated that the oral administration of AST improves the symptoms of dermatitis and pruritus in cases of AD via the regulation of inflammatory effects and expression of inflammatory cytokines.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 15K19681 and 15K09761) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and research aid from Fuji Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 15K19681 and 15K09761) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and research aid from Fuji Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Okayama Y (2005) Oxidative stress in allergic and inflammatory skin diseases. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy 4: 517–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tsukahara H, Shibata R, Ohshima Y, Todoroki Y, Sato S, Ohta N, et al. (2003) Oxidative stress and altered antioxidant defenses in children with acute exacerbation of atopic dermatitis. Life Sci 72: 2509–2516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sivaranjani N, Rao SV, Rajeev G. (2013) Role of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in atopic dermatitis. J Clin Diagn Res 7: 2683–2685. 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6635.3732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tsuboi H, Kouda K, Takeuchi H, Takigawa M, Masamoto Y, Takeuchi M, et al. (1998) 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in urine as an index of oxidative damage to DNA in the evaluation of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 138: 1033–1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Omata N, Tsukahara H, Ito S, Ohshima Y, Yasutomi M, Yamada A, et al. (2001) Increased oxidative stress in childhood atopic dermatitis. Life Sci 69: 223–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fassett RG, Coombes JS (2009) Astaxanthin, oxidative stress, inflammation and cardiovascular disease. Future Cardiol 5: 333–342. 10.2217/fca.09.19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jyonouchi H, Sun S, Tomita Y, Gross MD (1995) Astaxanthin, a carotenoid without vitamin A activity, augments antibody responses in cultures including T-helper cell clones and suboptimal doses of antigen. J Nutr 125: 2483–2492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kobayashi M (2000) In vivo antioxidant role of astaxanthin under oxidative stress in the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54: 550–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chew BP, Park JS, Wong MW, Wong TS (1999) A comparison of the anticancer activities of dietary beta-carotene, canthaxanthin and astaxanthin in mice in vivo. Anticancer Res 19: 1849–1853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ikeuchi M, Koyama T, Takahashi J, Yazawa K (2007) Effects of astaxanthin in obese mice fed a high-fat diet. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71: 893–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pashkow FJ, Watumull DG, Campbell CL (2008) Astaxanthin: a novel potential treatment for oxidative stress and inflammation in cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol 101: 58D–68D. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jang HY, Ji SJ, Kim YH, Lee HY, Shin JS, Cheong HT, et al. (2010) Antioxidative effects of astaxanthin against nitric oxide-induced oxidative stress on cell viability and gene expression in bovine oviduct epithelial cell and the developmental competence of bovine IVM/IVF embryos. Reprod Domest Anim 45: 967–974. 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01469.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee SJ, Bai SK, Lee KS, Namkoong S, Na HJ, Ha KS, et al. (2003) Astaxanthin inhibits nitric oxide production and inflammatory gene expression by suppressing I(kappa)B kinase-dependent NF-kappaB activation. Mol Cells 16: 97–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Suzuki Y, Ohgami K, Shiratori K, Jin XH, Ilieva I, Koyama Y, et al. (2006) Suppressive effects of astaxanthin against rat endotoxin-induced uveitis by inhibiting the NF-kB signaling pathway. Exp Eye Res 82: 275–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lennikov A, Kitaichi N, Fukase R, Murata M, Noda K, Ando R, et al. (2012) Amelioration of ultraviolet-induced photokeratitis in mice treated with astaxanthin eye drops. Mol Vis 18: 455–464. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yoshihisa Y, Rehman MU, Shimizu T (2014) Astaxanthin, a xanthophyll carotenoid, inhibits ultraviolet-induced apoptosis in keratinocytes. Exp Dermatol 23: 178–183. 10.1111/exd.12347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Matsuda H, Watanabe N, Geba GP, Sperl J, Tsudzuki M, Hiroi J, et al. (1997) Development of atopic dermatitis-like skin lesion with IgE hyperproduction in NC/Nga mice. Int Immunol 9: 461–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Andoh T, Haza S, Saito A, Kuraishi Y (2011) Involvement of leukotriene B4 in spontaneous itch-related behaviour in NC mice with atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions. Exp Dermatol 20: 894–898. 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01346.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kuraishi Y, Nagasawa T, Hayashi K, Satoh M (1995) Scratching behavior induced by pruritogenic but not algesiogenic agents in mice. Eur J Pharmacol 275: 229–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jawaid P, Rehman MU, Yoshihisa Y, Li P, Zhao Q, Hassan MA, et al. (2014) Effects of SOD/catalase mimetic platinum nanoparticles on radiation-induced apoptosis in human lymphoma U937 cells. Apoptosis 19: 1006–1016. 10.1007/s10495-014-0972-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Takizawa Y, Kitazato T, Kishimoto H, Tomita M, Hayashi M (2011) Effects of antioxidants on drug absorption in in vivo intestinal ischemia/reperfusion. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 35: 89–95. 10.1007/s13318-010-0020-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ye Q, Huang B, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Chen X (2012) Astaxanthin protects against MPP(+)-induced oxidative stress in PC12 cells via the HO-1/NOX2 axis. BMC Neurosci 13: 156 10.1186/1471-2202-13-156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Iwamoto T, Hosoda K, Hirano R, Kurata H, Matsumoto A, Miki W, et al. (2000) Inhibition of low-density lipoprotein oxidation by astaxanthin. J Atheroscler Thromb 7: 216–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Manabe E, Handa O, Naito Y, Mizushima K, Akagiri S, Adachi S, et al. (2008) Astaxanthin protects mesangial cells from hyperglycemia-induced oxidative signaling. J Cell Biochem 103: 1925–1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bystrom J, Amin K, Bishop-Bailey D (2011) Analysing the eosinophil cationic protein—a clue to the function of the eosinophil granulocyte. Respir Res 12: 10 10.1186/1465-9921-12-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Simon D, Braathen LR, Simon HU (2004) Eosinophils and atopic dermatitis. Allergy 59: 561–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Amon U, Menz U, Wolff HH (1994) Investigations on plasma levels of mast cell mediators in acute atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci 7: 63–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Harvima IT, Horsmanheimo L, Naukkarinen A, Horsmanheimo M (1994) Mast cell proteinases and cytokines in skin inflammation. Arch Dermatol Res 287: 61–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Leung DYM (2000) Atopic dermatitis: New insights and opportunities for therapeutic intervention. J Allergy Clin Immunol 105: 860–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Beck LA, Leung DY (2000) Allergen sensitization through the skin induces systemic allergic responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol 106: S258–S263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lampinen M, Carlson M, Håkansson LD, Venge P (2004) Cytokine-regulated accumulation of eosinophils in inflammatory disease. Allergy 59: 793–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ying S, Robinson DS, Meng Q, Rottman J, Kennedy R, Ringler DJ, et al. (1997) Enhanced expression of eotaxin and CCR3 mRNA and protein in atopic asthma. Association with airway hyperresponsiveness and predominant co-localization of eotaxin mRNA to bronchial epithelial and endothelial cells. Eur J Immunol 27: 3507–3516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yawalkar N, Uguccioni M, Schärer J, Braunwalder J, Karlen S, Dewald B, et al. (1999) Enhanced expression of eotaxin and CCR3 in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 113: 43–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sanderson CJ (1992) Pharmacological implications of interleukin-5 in the control of eosinophilia. Adv Pharmacol 23: 163–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yagi R, Nagai H, Iigo Y, Akimoto T, Arai T, Kubo M (2002) Development of atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in STAT6-deficient NC/Nga mice. J Immunol 168: 2020–2027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.