Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2015 Nov 29;7(2):1500–1515. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6430

The oncolytic virus dl922-947 reduces IL-8/CXCL8 and MCP-1/CCL2 expression and impairs angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma

Carmela Passaro 1,#, Francesco Borriello 1,2,#, Viviana Vastolo 1, Sarah Di Somma 1, Eloise Scamardella 1, Vincenzo Gigantino 3, Renato Franco 4, Gianni Marone 1,2,3, Giuseppe Portella 1
PMCID: PMC4811476  PMID: 26625205

Abstract

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is one of the most aggressive human solid tumor and current treatments are ineffective in increasing patients' survival. Thus, the development of new therapeutic approaches for ATC is needed. We have previously shown that the oncolytic adenovirus dl922-947 induces ATC cell death in vitro and tumor regression in vivo. However, the impact of dl922-947 on the pro-tumorigenic ATC microenvironment is still unknown. Since viruses are able to regulate cytokine and chemokine production from infected cells, we sought to investigate whether dl922-947 virotherapy has such effect on ATC cells, thereby modulating ATC microenvironment. dl922-947 decreased IL-8/CXCL8 and MCP-1/CCL2 production by the ATC cell lines 8505-c and BHT101-5. These results correlated with dl922-947-mediated reduction of NF-κB p65 binding to IL8 promoter in 8505-c and BHT101-5 cells and CCL2 promoter in 8505-c cells. IL-8 stimulates cancer cell proliferation, survival and invasion, and also angiogenesis. dl922-947-mediated reduction of IL-8 impaired ATC cell motility in vitro and ATC-induced angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. We also show that dl922-947-mediated reduction of the monocyte-attracting chemokine CCL2 decreased monocyte chemotaxis in vitro and tumor macrophage density in vivo. Interestingly, dl922-947 treatment induced the switch of tumor macrophages toward a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, likely by increasing the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interferon-γ. Altogether, we demonstrate that dl922-947 treatment re-shape the pro-tumorigenic ATC microenvironment by modulating cancer-cell intrinsic factors and the immune response. An in-depth knowledge of dl922-947-mediated effects on ATC microenvironment may help to refine ATC virotherapy in the context of cancer immunotherapy.

Keywords: virotherapy, tumor vasculature, innate immunity, tumor-associated macrophages, chemokine

INTRODUCTION

Tumorigenesis is a multistep process that involves cancer cell-intrinsic alterations and complex interactions with tumor stroma and infiltrating immune cells [1, 2]. Although therapeutic strategies aimed to target specific features of this process have proved to be effective for cancer treatment, their curative potential is often hampered by the development of a variety of resistance mechanisms. These involve acquisition of alternative strategies to restore the feature targeted by the treatment or reliance on other mechanisms. Indeed, cancer cell-extrinsic factors provided by the tumor microenvironment may mediate resistance to cytotoxic therapies. Thus, it is conceivable that strategies aimed at co-targeting several tumor-promoting mechanisms (e.g. cancer cell-intrinsic features and the tumor microenvironment) could optimize effectiveness and reduce therapeutic escape [3].

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are non-pathogenic viral strains or viral mutants that selectively replicate in and kill tumor cells without causing harm to normal cells [4]. The efficacy and safety of OVs has been demonstrated in clinical studies with encouraging results [5]. Recently, The FDA has approved the first oncolytic viral therapy, Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), to treat surgically unresectable skin and lymph node lesions in patients with advanced melanoma [6].

The mechanism of action of OVs has long been thought to be solely dependent on direct tumor cell killing. A growing body of evidence points to the immune system as having a critical role in determining the efficacy of virotherapy [7-9]. Indeed, OVs may break the tolerogenic tumor microenvironment and induce a long-lasting CD8 T cell-mediated anti-tumor response, thereby acting as vaccines [7]. In certain cases, a robust immune-dependent anti-tumor response was also elicited independently of viral oncolysis and replication [10]. Based on this evidence, several viral strains have been engineered to express factors (e.g. cytokines, chemokines and membrane receptors) that boost the anti-tumor immune response of which several have already shown promising results in clinical trials [11-16]. Taken together, evidence obtained so far suggests that a complex interaction between OV replication and the response of both tumor and immune cells to OV infection eventually determines the outcome of virotherapy.

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is one of the deadliest human solid tumors: although it accounts for less than 3% of all thyroid cancers, ATC is responsible for up to 50% of the annual mortality associated with thyroid tumors [17]. ATC treatment consists of surgery combined with radiation and chemotherapy. However, this treatment is often palliative as death usually occurs within 6 months from diagnosis, commonly caused by tracheal obstruction [18]. Several novel approaches have been tested for the treatment of ATC, including gene therapy [19, 20] and oncolytic virotherapy [21]. Our group has extensively evaluated the oncolytic adenovirus dl922-947 for the treatment of ATC. dl922-947 is a second generation adenoviral mutant bearing a 24-bp deletion in E1A-Conserved Region 2 [21]. This region binds to and inactivates pRb, dissociating the pRb-E2F complex and driving S phase entry and viral replication. The mutant E1A protein encoded by dl922-947 is unable to bind pRb, thereby the virus cannot induce S phase entry in normal cells. Nonetheless, dl922-947 replicates in cells with an aberrant G1-S checkpoint, which is a feature of almost 90% of human cancers [22]. In several experimental neoplastic models, including ATC, dl922-947 treatment, alone or in combination with molecularly-targeted drugs or ionizing radiations, can induce cancer cell death and tumor regression [23-30]. Although these studies were aimed to demonstrate synergistic effects of the combined treatments, we also observed an anti-angiogenic effect of the virus [29]. It is still unclear whether and how dl922-947 virotherapy modulates ATC microenvironment. Understanding the modulation of ATC microenvironment by dl922-947 treatment and the contribution to the anti-tumoral activity will be instrumental to develop more effective therapies.

ATC is markedly infiltrated by immune cells, namely macrophages [31, 32], which are likely to play a role in ATC development and progression. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) may differentiate from peripheral blood monocytes recruited in a MCP-1/CCL2-dependent manner (hereafter CCL2) [33]. ATC cells express high levels of the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) that catalyzes the conversion of amino acid tryptophan to the immunosuppressive molecule kynureine [34]. In addition, ATC cells produce the chemokine IL-8/CXCL8 (hereafter IL-8) that is involved in several aspects of tumor biology, namely cell proliferation, cell survival, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, stemness, and also angiogenesis [35-38].

Virus-infected cells activate an antiviral response aimed at blocking viral replication. The cellular antiviral response involves the production of type I and type III interferons (IFNs) and the modulation of cytokine and chemokine production. On the other hand, viruses have evolved several mechanisms to counteract the cellular antiviral mechanisms, e.g. by modulating the activity of transcription factors involved in the production of cytokine and chemokines [39, 40]. We hypothesized that dl922-947 virotherapy of ATC cells modulate the production of cytokines and chemokines, leading to modification of the tumor microenvironment.

In the present study we show that dl922-947 treatment reduces IL-8 and CCL2 production by ATC cell lines via displacement of the transcription factor NF-κB p65 from IL8 and CCL2 promoters. Furthermore, we provide evidence that dl922-947-induced reduction of IL-8 and CCL2 production correlates with impaired tumor angiogenesis and decreased macrophage density in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

dl922-947 reduces IL-8 and CCL2 production by ATC cell lines

The cellular response to viral infections involves the production of IFNs and the modulation of cytokines and chemokines release. Therefore, we analyzed by ELISA whether dl922-947 treatment of the ATC cell lines 8505-c and BHT101-5 modulates the expression of cytokines, chemokines and angiogenic factors. We could not detect TNF or IL-10 secretion in any of the tested conditions (data not shown), while VEGF-A production was not significantly modified by dl922-947 compared to the replication-defective adenovirus AdGFP (Supplementary Figure 1). Interestingly, both cell lines produced high levels of IL-8 and CCL2, which were reduced upon treatment with dl922-947 but not AdGFP (Figure 1, left panels). The latter results were confirmed by Real-Time PCR analysis of mRNA levels (Figure 1, right panels). In addition, we observed the same pattern of IL-8 and CCL2 secretion when the concentrations of these chemokines were normalized on the total cellular protein content to account for dl922-947-induced cell death (Supplementary Figure 2A).

Figure 1. IL-8 and CCL2 secretion and expression upon dl922-947 treatment.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

8505-c and BHT101-5 cells were treated with dl922-947 or the non-replicating adenovirus AdGFP (5 an 1 pfu/cell for both viruses, respectively). 48 hours after infection IL-8 and CCL2 secretion (left panels) and expression (right panels) were assessed by ELISA on cell-free supernatants and Real-Time PCR, respectively. The results are the mean of three independent experiments ±SEM. One-way ANOVA and Tuckey post-test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

In several cell types, the constitutive- or stimuli (e.g. PMA or TNF)-induced expression of IL-8 is negatively regulated by IFNβ at the transcriptional level [41-43]. Furthermore, virus-infected cells produce IFNβ as part of their antiviral response program [40]. Thus, we investigated whether IFNβ was involved in the dl922-947-dependent reduction of IL-8 production by acting in an autocrine/paracrine manner. IFNβ treatment did not reduce IL-8 production (Supplementary Figure 2B), nor IFNβ secretion could be detected by dl922-947-infected ATC cell lines (data not shown).

IL-8 and CCL2 reduction is associated with NF-κB p65 displacement from IL8 and CCL2 promoters

The expression of IL8 and CCL2 genes is regulated by NF-κB p65 (hereafter p65) nuclear localization and binding to cis-regulatory elements in IL8 and CCL2 promoters [44-46]. dl922-947 reduced p65 binding to IL8 (in BHT101-5 and 8505-c cells) and CCL2 (in 8505-c) promoters, as assessed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay (Figure 2A), without affecting total p65 protein levels (Supplementary Figure 3A). Cellular fractionation showed that dl922-947 treatment reduced p65 nuclear localization in BHT101-5 (Figure 2B). This effect was not observed in 8505-c cells (Figure 2B), indicating an alternative mechanism of p65 modulation.

Figure 2. p65 localization and binding to IL8 and CCL2 promoters after dl922-947 treatment.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

A. 8505-c and BHT101-5 cells were treated with dl922-947 (5 or 1 pfu/mL, respectively). After 24 hours, p65 binding to IL8 (upper panels) and CCL2 (lower panels) promoters was assessed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. For each experimental condition, p65 binding is expressed as fold enrichment over the non-specific binding (IgG) control. The results are the mean of three independent experiments ±SEM. One-way ANOVA and Tuckey post-test: ***p<0.001. B. 8505-c and BHT101-5 cells were treated for 24 hours with dl922-947 (5 and 1 pfu/cell, respectively). Cellular fractionation was performed to isolate nuclear and cytosolic fraction. Lysates were probed with p65 antibody, as well as Lamin A/C and GAPDH antibodies to verify the purity of the preparations. The blots are representative of three independent experiments.

Adenoviral proteins (e.g. E1A, E1B19K, E3) are known to interact with p65, impairing its activity [47-49]. In addition, p65 binds to E3 promoter and induces the expression of E3 proteins [50]. dl922-947 is completely deleted in E310.4K, E314.5K and E314.7K genes, whereas it has only a 24 bp deletion in the pRb-interacting region of E1A gene (E1AΔ24) [51]. To assess which adenoviral protein mediates the effects of dl922-947, we treated both cell lines with the E1B19K-deleted adenovirus Δ19K that express an intact form of E1A. The mutant Δ19K reduced IL8 mRNA expression (Supplementary Figure 3B), excluding E1B19K involvement in p65 modulation. Then, ATC cell lines were transfected with plasmids expressing E1A wild type (E1Awt) or a CR2-deleted form of E1A (E1AΔ24). The efficiency of transfection was confirmed by assessing E1A mRNA levels in transfected cells (data not shown). Transfection of E1Awt and E1AΔ24 reduced IL8 expression in 8505-c but not in BHT101-5 cells (Figure 3A). To evaluate a direct interaction between E1A and p65, protein extracts were immunoprecipitated using an anti-E1A antibody and the binding to p65 was assessed using an anti-p65 antibody. The interaction of E1Awt and E1AΔ24 with p65 was only observed in 8505-c cells (Figure 3B). Taken together, our data indicate that dl922-947 reduces p65 binding to IL8 promoter through an E1A-dependent mechanism in 8505-c cells or E1A-independent mechanisms that leads to reduced p65 nuclear localization in BHT101-5 cells.

Figure 3. E1A-dependent and -independent modulation of IL8 and CCL2 gene expression.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A. 8505-c and BHT101-5 cells were transfected with wild type (E1Awt) or a mutated form (E1AΔ24) of the adenoviral protein E1A. 32 hours after transfection IL8 and CCL2 mRNA expression was evaluated by Real-Time PCR. The results are the mean of three independent experiments ±SEM. One-way ANOVA and Tuckey post-test: ***p<0.001. B. 8505-c and BHT101-5 cells were transfected with E1Awt or E1AΔ24 alone or co-transfected with p65. 32 hours after transfection E1A was immunoprecipitated and its binding to p65 was assessed by western blotting using an anti-p65 antibody. The levels of p65, E1A and α-tubulin in total cell lysates were included as input controls. A BHT101-5 cells only transfected with p65 was used as positive control (p65 +ve control). The blots are representative of three independent experiments.

We also evaluated p65 binding to CCL2 promoter upon dl922-947 treatment. In 8505-c cells dl922-947 displaced p65 from the CCL2 promoter (Figure 2A). BHT101-5 did not show any constitutive binding of p65 to the CCL2 promoter (Figure 2A), likely due to an alternative regulation of CCL2 gene expression. In accordance with IL8 expression data, Δ19K treatment reduced CCL2 expression in both cell lines (Supplementary Figure 3B), while transfection of E1Awt and E1AΔ24 reduced CCL2 expression in 8505-c but not in BHT101-5 cells (Figure 3A).

To further validate our results we investigated the effects of dl922-947 treatment on IL-8 and CCL2 production by the papillary thyroid carcinoma cell line TPC1. dl922-947 and Δ19K treatments reduced IL-8 and CCL2 production at mRNA and protein levels (Supplementary Figure 4A). In addition, Δ19K significantly reduceds both IL8 and CCL2 expression (Supplementary Figure 4B). These results correlated with p65 displacement from IL8 and CCL2 promoters upon dl922-947 treatment (Supplementary Figure 5A). Similar to the results obtained with 8505-c cells, transfection of TPC1 cells with E1Awt or E1AΔ24 was sufficient to reduce IL8 and CCL2 mRNA expression (Supplementary Figure 5B).

dl922-947 impairs ATC-induced angiogenesis and monocyte chemotaxis in vitro via reduction of IL-8 and CCL2

The remarkable reduction of IL-8 and CCL2 secretion upon dl922-947 treatment prompted us to investigate its impact on the outcome of ATC virotherapy. IL-8 stimulates cancer cell proliferation, survival and invasion, and angiogenesis [38]. Treatment of ATC cells with IL-8 did not affect cell cycle progression (Supplementary Figure 6A), nor it increased cell survival of dl922-947-treated cells (Supplementary Figure 6B). Then, we analyzed the effects of dl922-947 on cell motility and angiogenesis using conditioned media (CM) of untreated and dl922-947-treated ATC cells. dl922-947 CM reduced cell motility in an in vitro wound-healing assay (Figure 4A). The effect was reverted by the addition of recombinant IL-8 (Figure 4A). ATC-CM also had a significant pro-angiogenic activity that was impaired by the addition of an anti-IL-8 blocking antibody, as assessed by an in vitro angiogenesis assay (Figure 4B). Conversely, dl922-947-CM exhibited a reduced pro-angiogenic activity compared to CM of untreated cells (Figure 4B). The addition of recombinant IL-8 completely reverted this effect (Figure 4B).

Figure 4. dl922-947 modulation of ATC cell motility and angiogenesis in vitro.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

A. In vitro wound-healing assay was used to assess ATC cell motility in two dimensions. 8505-c and BHT101-5 cell monolayers were scraped in a straight line to create a “scratch”. Cells were then incubated with conditioned media (CM) obtained from 8505-c and BHT101-5 cells treated or not (CTRL) with dl922-947 (5 and 1 pfu/cell, respectively). Recombinant IL-8 (10 ng/mL) was also added to CM obtained from dl922-947-treated cells. The distance traveled by the cells was determined by measuring the wound width at time 9 hours (for 8505-c cells) and time 6 (for BHT101-5 cells) and subtracting it from the wound width at time 0. The values obtained were then expressed as % migration, setting the gap width at time 0 as 100%. One-way ANOVA and Tuckey post-test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01. B. HUVEC cells were incubated with CM obtained as indicated above. Tube formation was evaluated after 16 hours. Graphs display three different parameters: n° of meshes (n° of tubes), total area of meshes and n° of branching points. The results are the mean of three independent experiments ±SEM. One-way ANOVA and Tuckey post-test: *p<0.05; **p<0.01.

Finally, we investigated whether ATC-CM induce monocyte chemotaxis by producing the monocyte-attracting chemokine CCL2. CM of untreated ATC cells induced monocyte chemotaxis in vitro (Figure 5). In accordance with dl922-947-mediated reduction of CCL2, dl922-947-CM exhibited a reduced chemotactic activity on monocytes (Figure 5). The effect was reverted by the addition of recombinant CCL2 (Figure 5).

Figure 5. dl922-947 modulation of monocyte chemotaxis in vitro.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Monocytes onto the filters in the top compartment of the Boyden chamber. Conditioned media (CM) obtained from 8505-c and BHT101-5 cells treated or not (CTRL) with dl922-947 (5 and 1 pfu/cell, respectively) were added into the lower chamber. Recombinant CCL-2 (10 ng/mL) was also added to CM obtained from dl922-947-treated cells. After 2 hours filters cells that migrated through the filter were counted. The results are the mean of three independent experiments ±SEM. One-way ANOVA and Tuckey post-test: ***p<0.001.

dl922-947 treatment reduces angiogenesis and TAM density in an in vivo model of ATC

To validate our results in vivo, we established tumor xenografts in athymic mice using the ATC cell line 8505-c. This cell line was chosen because of its higher resistance to dl922-947 treatment. Mice were intratumorally injected with dl922-947 (5*107 pfu) twice per week for a total of 3 weeks. All animals were sacrificed after 6 weeks from the beginning of treatment. dl922-947 treatment significantly reduced tumor volume already at 8 days and completely eradicated the tumors in 40% of mice after 2 weeks (Figure 6A and Supplementary Figure 7). These animals remained tumor-free until the end of the experiment. In previous studies performed with a different ATC cell line we did not observe a significant effect of the virus within 8 days of treatment [26, 28, 29], and a complete tumor regression rarely occurred (Portella G., personal observations). These discrepancies can be explained by taking into account the higher viral dose used in the present study.

Figure 6. In vivo effects of dl922-947 on IL-8 expression and angiogenesis.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

A. 6 week-old female CD1 athymic mice (15/group) were injected into the right flank with 8505-c cells (1*107 cells/0.2 mL). Two weeks after tumor injection, mice were treated intratumorally with dl922-947 (5*107 pfu) or its vehicle (CTRL) at day 0, 4, 8, 11 and 14 (day 0 = first injection of the virus). Tumor diameters were measured with calipers at day 0, 4, 8, 11, 14, 18 and 22 and tumor volume was calculated. Differences in the rate of tumor growth were assessed for each time point. Student's t test: *p<0.05. B. Real-Time PCR analysis of IL8 mRNA levels in tumors excised at day 8 (5/group) treated as described above. Student's t test: *p<0.05. C. Representative histological analysis of IL-8 expression in tumor samples excised at day 8 treated as described above. D. Real-Time PCR analysis of Cd31 mRNA levels in tumors excised at day 22 (3/group) treated as described above. Student's t test: **p<0.01. E. Representative histological analysis of CD31 expression in tumor samples excised at day 22 treated as described above. F. Quantification of tumor microvessel density (TMD) in tumor samples excised at day 22 treated as described above. TMD was determined as the percentage of CD31-positive area on total tumor area per field. Three randomly selected areas from three different tumors for each group were analyzed. Student's t test: ***p<0.001.

After 1 week of treatment, we observed decreased levels of IL-8 (Figure 6B-6C) that correlated with reduced expression of Cd31 mRNA (an endothelial cell marker) (Figure 6D) and tumor microvessel density (TMD) (Figure 6E-6F) after 3 weeks of treatment. CCL2 mRNA expression was also reduced after 1 week of treatment (Figure 7A). This effect was paralleled by a decrease in TAM density as shown by immunohistochemistry (Figure 7B). Interestingly, dl922-947 treatment also induced a switch of TAM polarization toward a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, as assessed by increased expression of the M1 marker Nos2 (Figure 7C). Accordingly, we also observed increased Ifng mRNA levels (Figure 7D), a cytokine that induces Nos2 expression in macrophages [52]. No significant modulation of the M2-associated genes Ym1 and Arg1 was detected (Figure 7C).

Figure 7. In vivo effects of dl922-947 on tumor macrophage density and polarization.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

A. Real-Time PCR analysis of CCL2 mRNA levels in tumors excised at day 8 (5/group) treated as described in Figure 6A. Student's t test: **p<0.01. B. Representative histological analysis of F4/80 expression in tumor samples excised at day 8 treated as described in Figure 6A. Red arrows indicate illustrative F4/80-positive cells (macrophages). C. Real-Time PCR analysis of mRNA levels of the M2 (Ym1, Arg1) and M1 (Nos2) markers in tumors excised at day 8 (5/group) treated as described in Figure 6A. Student's t test: *p<0.05. D. Real-Time PCR analysis of Ifng mRNA levels in tumors excised at day 8 (5/group) treated as described in Figure 6A. Student's t test: *p<0.05.

DISCUSSION

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is one of the deadliest human malignancies, rapidly leading to trachea obstruction and death [17]. ATC is resistant to current available treatments and novel therapeutic strategies are needed. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the oncolytic virus dl922-947 holds potential for the treatment of ATC. The main focus of these studies has been the direct cell killing activity of the virus and its ability to potentiate other treatments. Here, we demonstrate that dl922-947 treatment also affects tumor angiogenesis and macrophage density, two hallmarks of the pro-tumorigenic ATC microenvironment.

The development of a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment is a complex process, which also involves cytokine and chemokine production by cancer cells [53]. In particular, the production of IL-8 by ATC cells is involved in several aspects of tumorigenesis, namely induction of angiogenesis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stemness [35, 37]. Therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting IL-8 could represent a promising approach for ATC management. Our results demonstrate that the treatment with the oncolytic virus dl922-947 reduces IL-8 production by ATC cells in vitro and in vivo. In addition, we show that ATC cells produce the monocyte-attracting chemokine CCL2, which is likewise reduced by dl922-947 treatment. We confirmed these results in the papillary thyroid cancer cell line TPC1. The production of IL-8 and CCL2 has been demonstrated for several cancer cell types [54]. Whether the modulation of these chemokines represents a general feature of dl922-947 treatment or a thyroid-specific effect is unclear at present.

The expression of IL8 and CCL2 genes is induced by the binding of NF-κB p65 to cis-regulatory elements in their promoters [44-46]. We demonstrate that dl922-947 treatment decreases p65 binding to IL8 promoter in both ATC cell lines and TPC1 as well. We also show that dl922-947 reduces p65 binding to CCL2 promoter in 8505-c and TPC1 cells, while no constitutive p65 binding was observed in BHT101-5 cells. Several additional transcription factors (e.g. AP-1 and Sp1) [45, 46] not assessed in our study have been involved in modulating CCL2 gene expression and likely compensate for the absence of p65 binding in BHT101-5 cells. Nevertheless, CCL2 reduction in BHT101-5 cells upon dl922-947 treatment suggests a broad impact of the virus on several transcription factors.

The modulation of NF-κB activity by dl922-947 may involve several and not mutually exclusive mechanisms. There are five NF-κB family members in mammals (RelA/p65, RelB, c-Rel, p50 and p52) that may combine in homodimers or heterodimers [55]. p65 is usually retained in the cytoplasm as a p65:p50 heterodimer due to its interaction with IκBα that masks the p65 nuclear localization signal while exposing a nuclear export signal. Phosphorylation and proteasomal degradation of IκBα induces the translocation of NF-κB dimers to the nucleus [55]. We demonstrate a direct interaction of the adenoviral protein E1A and its mutated form E1AΔ24 with p65 in 8505-c cells, a mechanism reported to inhibit the NF-κB pathway in several adenovirus-infected cell lines [48]. Transfection of both E1A and E1AΔ24 reduces IL8 and CCL2 mRNA expression in 8505-c cells. These results were confirmed in TPC1 cells but were not observed in BHT101-5 cells. Accordingly, we could not demonstrate the binding of E1A and E1AΔ24 to p65 in the latter cell line. dl922-947 treatment reduces p65 nuclear localization in BHT101-5 cells, which likely accounts for the reduced p65 binding to IL8 promoter. Thus, it is likely that in this cell line dl922-947 interferes with one or more steps of p65 nuclear translocation/localization through a still uncovered mechanism. Taken together, our results indicate that dl922-947 interferes with the NF-κB pathway, which plays a prominent role in ATC pathogenesis [56]. Again, it will be relevant to assess whether this effect is specific for thyroid cancers or it is shared by other tumors that display an enhanced NF-κB activity (e.g. breast cancer, colorectal cancer) [57, 58].

In an effort to identify the functional significance of dl922-947-mediated IL-8 and CCL2 reduction, we found that dl922-947 treatment of ATC cells impairs IL-8-induced angiogenesis and CCL2-induced monocyte chemotaxis in vitro. These findings were substantiated by in vivo results. Indeed, dl922-947 treatment of tumor xenografts established in athymic mice reduces IL8 mRNA level after 1 week and Cd31 mRNA level and TMD after 3 weeks of treatment. These observations are in line with the anti-angiogenic effect of dl922-947 observed in ATC xenografts established with FRO cells [29]. Although our results strongly suggest that the anti-angiogenic activity of dl922-947 relies on the decreased production of IL-8 by ATC cells, we cannot exclude that the in vivo effects of dl922-947 treatment on TMD are triggered by additional mechanisms. Indeed, in unrelated tumor models, oncolytic adenoviruses exert an anti-vascular activity through different mechanisms [59]. A replication-competent oncolytic adenovirus lacking E1B suppresses the production of the pro-angiogenic factor VEGF-A in pancreatic cancer cells by disrupting the interaction between the transcription factor HIF-1α and the transcriptional co-activator p300 [60]. Our data demonstrate that dl922-947 does not modulate VEGF-A secretion in ATC cells. The vasculature-disrupting activity of oncolytic adenoviruses may also rely on the production of anti-angiogenic cytokines by immune cells, namely IFNγ [61].

The prominent role of TAMs in cancer progression and modulation of therapeutic responsiveness has been established in several models [62-64]. Therapeutic strategies aimed at depleting TAMs or modulating their activity are being developed and tested in clinical trials. These approaches would be suitable for treating ATC since this tumor is markedly infiltrated by TAMs [31, 32]. Treatment with wild type or E1A- or E3-deleted adenoviruses modulates macrophage infiltration in several tumor models [65]. Here we demonstrate that dl922-947 treatment reduces the production of the monocyte-attracting chemokine CCL2, human monocyte chemotaxis in vitro and TAM density in vivo. It is not possible to exclude that the reduced tumor vasculature in dl922-947-treated tumors may contribute to decrease TAM density by reducing the recruitment of peripheral blood monocytes. Thus, dl922-947-mediated reduction of CCL2 and IL-8 may have a synergistic effect on TAM depletion by reducing chemokine-induced monocyte recruitment and tumor vasculature.

TAM depletion in dl922-947-treated tumors is associated with increased expression of Nos2, a marker of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages. Accordingly, we observed increased expression of Ifng mRNA (encoding the protein IFNγ) that may be responsible for the switch toward a macrophage M1 phenotype [52]. Several lymphocyte populations, namely NK cells, CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes produce IFNγ. Preliminary results suggest that dl922-947 treatment induces intratumoral recruitment of activated NK cells (Passaro C. and Borriello F., unpublished observations). However, our results were obtained using ATC xenografts established in athymic mice. This model lacks in T cell-mediated immunity and therefore does not completely recapitulate the lymphocyte-mediated anti-tumor response elicited by virotherapy. Recently, mouse ATC cell lines have been established [66] that will allow the development of ATC allograft models in immunocompetent mice. It will be interesting to assess the effects of dl922-947 treatment in the context of a fully competent immune system since there is evidence that virotherapy induces a robust and long-lasting T cell-mediated anti-tumor response [7-9].

In conclusion, we demonstrate that dl922-947 treatment, along with its known role in inducing cell death, impacts on ATC microenvironment by modulating cancer-cell intrinsic factors and the immune response. Our results may be helpful for refining ATC virotherapy in the context of cancer immunotherapy [67].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells, adenoviruses, recombinant cytokines and blocking antibodies

Human thyroid carcinoma cell lines 8505-c (anaplastic), BHT101-5 (anaplastic) and TPC1 (papillary) have been described and authenticated elsewhere [68]. dl922-947 (Δ24bpCR2E1A, ΔE3B) and the non-replicating reporter adenovirus AdGFP (ΔE1) were expanded in the human embryonic kidney cell line HEK-293, purified and stored as previously reported [69]. Δ19K was kindly provided by Dr Gunnel Halldén (Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK). Recombinant human IL-8, IFNβ and anti-IL-8 blocking antibody were purchased from PeproTech (London, UK).

ELISA assay

1*104 8505-c, BHT101-5 or TPC1 cells were plated in 12-multiwell plates and treated as indicated. After 48 hours of treatment, cytokine concentrations were measured in cell-free supernatants using commercially available ELISA kits for IL-8 (DY208, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and CCL2 (88-7399-22, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). IFNβ concentration was detected by sandwich ELISA using rabbit anti-human IFNβ (500-P32B, PeproTech, London, UK) and biotinylated rabbit anti-human IFNβ (500-P32BBt, PeproTech, London, UK). When indicated, cytokine concentrations were normalized on total cellular protein content. Standard curves were generated with a Four Parametric Logistic curve fit and data were analysed using MyAssays Analysis Software Solutions (www.myassays.com).

RNA isolation and Real-Time PCR

For in vitro experiments, 2*105 8505-c, BHT101-5 or TPC1 cells were plated in 60mm dishes. After 48 hours of treatment total, RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsberg, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For in vivo experiments, tumors were excised at day 8 (week 1 of treatment) and day 22 (week 3 of treatment), homogenized and total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsberg, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. 2 μg of total RNA were reverse-transcribed using Superscript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsberg, CA, USA). Real-Time PCR was carried out using a CFX96 Real-Time System (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA). Reactions were run in triplicate in three independent experiments. Specific primers were used to measure mRNA expression by Real-Time PCR. The list of primers is available as Supplementary Table 1. Expression data were normalized to the geometric mean of housekeeping gene GAPDH analyzed using the 2−ΔCT or 2−ΔΔCT methods [70].

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

2*106 cells were seeded in 100mm dish and 24 hours later treated with dl922-947 (5, 1 and 5 pfu/cell for 8505-c, BHT101-5 and TPC1 cells, respectively). At 24 hours post-infection (hpi) cells were washed with PBS and cross-linked using 1% formaldehyde for 15 min. The cross-linking reaction was stopped by the addition of 125 mM glycine. Cells were washed twice in cold PBS, lysed in SDS lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10mM EDTA, 50mM Tris-HCl pH8.1, 1X protease inhibitor mixture) and sonicated five to nine times for 30 sec each at 18% maximum setting of the sonicator (Branson Sonifier, model 250) to achieve chromatin fragments ranging between 300 and 800 bp in size. Immunoprecipitation was carried out overnight at 4°C with 2.5 μg of the appropriate antibody: p65 (sc-372X, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) or normal rabbit IgG (17-684, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) (as negative control). Chromatin-antibody complexes were isolated using protein G/salmon sperm DNA (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and sequentially washed for 5 min each in wash buffer I (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2mM EDTA, 150mM NaCl, 20mM Tris-HCl, pH8.1), wash buffer II (wash buffer I with 500mM NaCl), wash buffer III (0.25M LiCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% deoxycholate, 1mM EDTA, 10mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1) and twice with TE buffer (10mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1mM EDTA). Input DNA (one-tenth of total lysates separated before immunoprecipitation) and immunoprecipitates were eluted by freshly prepared buffer (1% SDS, 0.1M NaHCO3) and overnight heated at 65°C to reverse formaldehyde cross-linking. DNA fragments were recovered by phenol/chloroform extraction and analyzed by Real-Time PCR with primers listed in Supplementary Materials. Relative fold change was assessed using the 2−ΔΔCT method and normalized to input.

Protein extraction, cellular fractionation and western blot analysis

After the indicated treatments, attached and detached cells were harvested and protein lysates were prepared as previously described [24]. 20 μg of protein lysates were probed with the following antibodies: p65 (sc-372X, 1:1000, Dallas, TX, Santa Cruz), Lamin A/C (sc-20681, 1:500, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), α-tubulin (#T9026, 1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), Adenovirus 2/5 E1A (sc-430, 1:500, Dallas, TX, Santa Cruz, USA). Cellular fractionation was performed using NE-PER™ Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following manufacturer's instruction.

Cloning and transfection

The DNA sequences of wild type (E1Awt) and Δ24 form of E1A (E1AΔ24) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Long expand High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Roche, Basel, Swiss). The viral genomic DNA from wild type adenovirus type 5 and dl922-947 were respectively used as templates. The following oligonucleotide primers were used:

  • Forward: 5′- CGATAAGCTTGTAGAGTTTTCTCCTCCGAG -3′

  • Reverse: 5′- CGATCTCGAGCACACACGCAATCACAGG -3′

The underlined sequences in both primer sequences correspond, respectively, to the HindIII and XhoI restriction sites, which are compatible with the multiple cloning sites on pcDNA3 expression vector. The PCR fragment and the pcDNA3 vector were then digested with the same enzymes to generate the same sticky ends. The digestion products of both the PCR fragments and the expression vector were ligated at 16°C for 16 hours in the presence of the ligation buffer and T4 DNA ligase. Ligated mixture was transformed into an appropriate bacteria strain DH5α. Transformed cells were selected on a LB plate containing 100 mg/mL ampicillin at 37°C for 16 hours. Positive transformants were inoculated into LB broth containing 100 mg/mL ampicilin for plasmids propagation. Plasmids were isolated and the presence of the inserts was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction enzyme digestion. Inserts were sequenced before proceeding with transfection. pcDNA3 plasmid containing p65 coding sequence was kindly provided by Paola Ungaro (University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy). 8505-c, BHT101-5 and TPC1 cells were seeded in 60mm dish. When cells reached 80% of confluence, 1 μg of plasmidic DNA from p65, E1Awt and E1AΔ24 plasmids was transfected as indicated using Lipofectamine® 3000 following manufacturer's instruction. (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Co-immunoprecipitation

8505-c and BHT101-5 cells were transfected with E1Awt or E1AΔ24 alone or co-transfected with p65. 32 hours after transfection total proteins were extracted using Buffer X (50 mM Tris pH 8.8, 250 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 2 mM, EDTA, 2 mg/mL BSA) and 500 ng of total lysates were used for immunoprecipitation. Immunoprecipitation was carried out overnight at 4°C with 2 μg of the anti-Adenovirus 2/5 E1A antibody (sc-430, 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Protein-antibody complexes were isolated using protein A (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and sequentially washed with NETN buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM tris-HCl pH 8, 0.2 % NP-40). Buffers were supplemented with 1X proteases and phosphatases inhibitor mixture. The binding of E1Awt or E1AΔ24 to p65 was assessed by western blot using an anti-p65 antibody (sc-372X, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA).

In vitro wound healing assay

8505-c and BHT101-5 cells were plated overnight to achieve a subconfluent cell layer in 60mm plates. Cell monolayer was scraped in a straight line to create a “scratch” with a p10 pipet tip. Debris were removed and the edge of the scratch smoothed by washing the cells once with PBS. Cells were then incubated with 3 ml of conditioned media (CM) to perform the in vitro scratch assay. The distance traveled by the cells was determined by measuring the wound width at time 9 or 6 hours (for 8505-c and BHT101-5 cells, respectively) and subtracting it from the wound width at time 0. The values obtained were then expressed as % of migration, setting the gap width at time 0 as 100%. CM were collected from 8505-c and BHT101-5 cells treated or not (CTRL) for 48h with dl922-947 and UV irradiated (seven cycles of 125J UV light) to inactivate the virus [71].

Endothelial tube formation assay (in vitro angiogenesis)

1*104 8505-c or BHT101-5 cells were plated in 12-multiwell plates and treated as indicated. After 48 hours of treatment, conditioned media were collected as described above. The angiogenesis assay was performed using the Endothelial tube formation assay (in vitro angiogenesis) kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following manufacturer's instruction. Three different angiogenic parameters were evaluated (number of meshes, total area of meshes and number of branching point) as previously described [72].

In vitro chemotaxis assay

Peripheral blood from healthy donors was layered onto Histopaque-1077 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and centrifuged at 400g for 20 min. Mononuclear cells were collected at the interface and monocytes were further purified with CD14 Microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Chemotaxis was performed in a 48-microwell chemotaxis chamber (Costar-NucleporeTM, Milan, Italy), using a 5 μm pore-size polyvinylpyrrolidone-free polycarbonate filter (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) which divides each well into two compartments. 27 μl of CM obtained as described above were added to the lower compartment. DMEM with 0.1% BSA was used as negative control to evaluate background migration. The upper compartment was filled with 50 μl of monocyte suspension (2*106 cells/ml in DMEM with 0.1% BSA). The chamber was incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere for 120 min. The filter was then removed and cells were fixed with absolute ethanol and stained with Differential Quik Stain Kit (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). Cells that had not migrated were removed from the upper surface of the filter. Migrated cells were counted in nine microscopic fields per well.

Mice and ATC xenograft model

CD-1® athymic mice were obtained from Charles River (Wilmington, MA, USA) and maintained at the Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies Animal Facility (University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy). All experiments were carried out using 6-week-old females. To initiate tumor xenografts, 8505-c cells in exponential phase were prepared at a concentration of 1*107cells/ml in 0.2 ml of DMEM medium. Cell suspension was injected into the right flank of 30 animals. Tumor diameters were measured with calipers and tumor volume (V) was calculated by the formula for a rotational ellipsoid: V=A*B2/2 (A, axial diameter; B, rotational diameter). Mice weights were weekly monitored. Twenty days post-injection mice with similar tumor size were randomized into two groups (15 animals/group): untreated and treated with dl922–947. A high viral dose (5*107 pfu) was administered twice per week by intratumoral injection to avoid any first-pass effect for a total of three weeks [26, 69, 27]. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with accepted standards of animal care and the Italian regulations for the welfare of animals used in studies of experimental neoplasia. The study was approved by our institutional committee on animal care.

Immunohistochemistry, tumor microvessel and TAM density measurement

Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded 4 μm sections of tumors were processed as already described [73]. Antigen retrieval was performed in 1 mM EDTA buffer pH 8 and primary antibodies were left ON at 4°C. The following antibodies were used: CD31 (Ab28364, dilution 1:50, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), F4/80 (12506, dilution 1:50, Novus, Littleton, CO, USA) and IL-8 (Ab106350, dilution 1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). To calculate the tumor microvessel density (TMD), CD31-positive area and total tumor area per field from was measured using ImageJ software. TMD was then determined as a percentage of CD31-positive area per field. Three randomly selected areas from three different tumors were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with Prism 5 (GraphPad Software). p values were calculated with paired t test or repeated measure one-way ANOVA corrected for multiple comparisons unless otherwise indicated. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS AND METHODS, FIGURES AND TABLE

Acknowledgments

We thank Salvatore Sequino for his excellent technical assistance and Silvana Libertini for proofreading the manuscript.

Footnotes

FUNDING

This study was supported by the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) (G.P.), grants from the Ministero dell'Istruzione, Università e Ricerca (MIUR) and Regione Campania CISI-Lab Project, CRÈME Project and TIMING Project (G.M.).

C.P. is supported by an American-Italian Cancer Foundation Post-Doctoral Research Fellowship.

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

The authors of this study have nothing to disclose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1073–81. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hanahan D. Rethinking the war on cancer. Lancet. 2014;383:558–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62226-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Russell SJ, Peng KW, Bell JC. Oncolytic virotherapy. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:658–70. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sheridan C. First oncolytic virus edges towards approval in surprise vote. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:569–70. doi: 10.1038/nbt0615-569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.First Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Melanoma. Cancer Discov. 2015 doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2015-158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bartlett DL, Liu Z, Sathaiah M, Ravindranathan R, Guo Z, He Y, Guo ZS. Oncolytic viruses as therapeutic cancer vaccines. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:103. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chiocca EA, Rabkin SD. Oncolytic viruses and their application to cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:295–300. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tong AW, Senzer N, Cerullo V, Templeton NS, Hemminki A, Nemunaitis J. Oncolytic viruses for induction of anti-tumor immunity. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:1750–60. doi: 10.2174/138920112800958913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Prestwich RJ, Ilett EJ, Errington F, Diaz RM, Steele LP, Kottke T, Thompson J, Galivo F, Harrington KJ, Pandha HS, Selby PJ, Vile RG, Melcher AA. Immune-mediated antitumor activity of reovirus is required for therapy and is independent of direct viral oncolysis and replication. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:4374–81. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Andtbacka RH, Kaufman HL, Collichio F, Amatruda T, Senzer N, Chesney J, Delman KA, Spitler LE, Puzanov I, Agarwala SS, Milhem M, Cranmer L, Curti B, et al. Talimogene Laherparepvec Improves Durable Response Rate in Patients With Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burke JM, Lamm DL, Meng MV, Nemunaitis JJ, Stephenson JJ, Arseneau JC, Aimi J, Lerner S, Yeung AW, Kazarian T, Maslyar DJ, McKiernan JM. A first in human phase 1 study of CG0070, a GM-CSF expressing oncolytic adenovirus, for the treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol. 2012;188:2391–7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cripe TP, Ngo MC, Geller JI, Louis CU, Currier MA, Racadio JM, Towbin AJ, Rooney CM, Pelusio A, Moon A, Hwang TH, Burke JM, Bell JC, et al. Phase 1 study of intratumoral Pexa-Vec (JX-594), an oncolytic and immunotherapeutic vaccinia virus, in pediatric cancer patients. Mol Ther. 2015;23:602–8. doi: 10.1038/mt.2014.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hemminki O, Parviainen S, Juhila J, Turkki R, Linder N, Lundin J, Kankainen M, Ristimaki A, Koski A, Liikanen I, Oksanen M, Nettelbeck DM, Kairemo K, et al. Immunological data from cancer patients treated with Ad5/3-E2F-Delta24-GMCSF suggests utility for tumor immunotherapy. Oncotarget. 2015;6:4467–81. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heo J, Reid T, Ruo L, Breitbach CJ, Rose S, Bloomston M, Cho M, Lim HY, Chung HC, Kim CW, Burke J, Lencioni R, Hickman T, et al. Randomized dose-finding clinical trial of oncolytic immunotherapeutic vaccinia JX-594 in liver cancer. Nat Med. 2013;19:329–36. doi: 10.1038/nm.3089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hwang TH, Moon A, Burke J, Ribas A, Stephenson J, Breitbach CJ, Daneshmand M, De Silva N, Parato K, Diallo JS, Lee YS, Liu TC, Bell JC, et al. A mechanistic proof-of-concept clinical trial with JX-594, a targeted multi-mechanistic oncolytic poxvirus, in patients with metastatic melanoma. Mol Ther. 2011;19:1913–22. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nagaiah G, Hossain A, Mooney CJ, Parmentier J, Remick SC. Anaplastic thyroid cancer: a review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. J Oncol. 2011;2011:542358. doi: 10.1155/2011/542358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carling T, Udelsman R. Thyroid cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2014;65:125–37. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-061512-105739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elisei R, Vivaldi A, Ciampi R, Faviana P, Basolo F, Santini F, Traino C, Pacini F, Pinchera A. Treatment with drugs able to reduce iodine efflux significantly increases the intracellular retention time in thyroid cancer cells stably transfected with sodium iodide symporter complementary deoxyribonucleic acid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:2389–95. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-2480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gholami S, Haddad D, Chen CH, Chen NG, Zhang Q, Zanzonico PB, Szalay AA, Fong Y. Novel therapy for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells using an oncolytic vaccinia virus carrying the human sodium iodide symporter. Surgery. 2011;150:1040–7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hallden G, Portella G. Oncolytic virotherapy with modified adenoviruses and novel therapeutic targets. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2012;16:945–58. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2012.712962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Indovina P, Pentimalli F, Casini N, Vocca I, Giordano A. RB1 dual role in proliferation and apoptosis: cell fate control and implications for cancer therapy. Oncotarget. 2015;6:17873–90. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bhattacharyya M, Francis J, Eddouadi A, Lemoine NR, Hallden G. An oncolytic adenovirus defective in pRb-binding (dl922-947) can efficiently eliminate pancreatic cancer cells and tumors in vivo in combination with 5-FU or gemcitabine. Cancer Gene Ther. 2011;18:734–43. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2011.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Botta G, Passaro C, Libertini S, Abagnale A, Barbato S, Maione AS, Hallden G, Beguinot F, Formisano P, Portella G. Inhibition of autophagy enhances the effects of E1A-defective oncolytic adenovirus dl922-947 against glioma cells in vitro and in vivo. Hum Gene Ther. 2012;23:623–34. doi: 10.1089/hum.2011.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ingemarsdotter CK, Tookman LA, Browne A, Pirlo K, Cutts R, Chelela C, Khurrum KF, Leung EY, Dowson S, Webber L, Khan I, Ennis D, Syed N, et al. Paclitaxel resistance increases oncolytic adenovirus efficacy via upregulated CAR expression and dysfunctional cell cycle control. Mol Oncol. 2015;9:791–805. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Libertini S, Abagnale A, Passaro C, Botta G, Barbato S, Chieffi P, Portella G. AZD1152 negatively affects the growth of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells and enhances the effects of oncolytic virus dl922-947. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011;18:129–41. doi: 10.1677/ERC-10-0234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Libertini S, Iacuzzo I, Perruolo G, Scala S, Ierano C, Franco R, Hallden G, Portella G. Bevacizumab increases viral distribution in human anaplastic thyroid carcinoma xenografts and enhances the effects of E1A-defective adenovirus dl922-947. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:6505–14. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Passaro C, Abagnale A, Libertini S, Volpe M, Botta G, Cella L, Pacelli R, Hallden G, Gillespie D, Portella G. Ionizing radiation enhances dl922-947-mediated cell death of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:633–47. doi: 10.1530/ERC-13-0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Passaro C, Volpe M, Botta G, Scamardella E, Perruolo G, Gillespie D, Libertini S, Portella G. PARP inhibitor olaparib increases the oncolytic activity of dl922-947 in in vitro and in vivo model of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2015;9:78–92. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Radhakrishnan S, Miranda E, Ekblad M, Holford A, Pizarro MT, Lemoine NR, Hallden G. Efficacy of oncolytic mutants targeting pRb and p53 pathways is synergistically enhanced when combined with cytotoxic drugs in prostate cancer cells and tumor xenografts. Hum Gene Ther. 2010;21:1311–25. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Caillou B, Talbot M, Weyemi U, Pioche-Durieu C, Al Ghuzlan A, Bidart JM, Chouaib S, Schlumberger M, Dupuy C. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) form an interconnected cellular supportive network in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ryder M, Ghossein RA, Ricarte-Filho JC, Knauf JA, Fagin JA. Increased density of tumor-associated macrophages is associated with decreased survival in advanced thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008;15:1069–74. doi: 10.1677/ERC-08-0036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Richards DM, Hettinger J, Feuerer M. Monocytes and macrophages in cancer: development and functions. Cancer Microenviron. 2013;6:179–91. doi: 10.1007/s12307-012-0123-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moretti S, Menicali E, Voce P, Morelli S, Cantarelli S, Sponziello M, Colella R, Fallarino F, Orabona C, Alunno A, de Biase D, Bini V, Mameli MG, et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is up-regulated in thyroid carcinoma and drives the development of an immunosuppressant tumor microenvironment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E832–40. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bauerle KT, Schweppe RE, Lund G, Kotnis G, Deep G, Agarwal R, Pozdeyev N, Wood WM, Haugen BR. Nuclear factor kappaB-dependent regulation of angiogenesis, and metastasis in an in vivo model of thyroid cancer is associated with secreted interleukin-8. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E1436–44. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Palena C, Hamilton DH, Fernando RI. Influence of IL-8 on the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the tumor microenvironment. Future Oncol. 2012;8:713–22. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Visciano C, Liotti F, Prevete N, Cali G, Franco R, Collina F, de Paulis A, Marone G, Santoro M, Melillo RM. Mast cells induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell features in human thyroid cancer cells through an IL-8-Akt-Slug pathway. Oncogene. 2015 doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Waugh DJ, Wilson C. The interleukin-8 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:6735–41. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Iwasaki A. A virological view of innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:177–96. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schneider WM, Chevillotte MD, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes: a complex web of host defenses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:513–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lee TH, Lee GW, Ziff EB, Vilcek J. Isolation and characterization of eight tumor necrosis factor-induced gene sequences from human fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:1982–8. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nozell S, Laver T, Patel K, Benveniste EN. Mechanism of IFN-beta-mediated inhibition of IL-8 gene expression in astroglioma cells. J Immunol. 2006;177:822–30. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.2.822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Singh RK, Gutman M, Llansa N, Fidler IJ. Interferon-beta prevents the upregulation of interleukin-8 expression in human melanoma cells. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 1996;16:577–84. doi: 10.1089/jir.1996.16.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hoffmann E, Dittrich-Breiholz O, Holtmann H, Kracht M. Multiple control of interleukin-8 gene expression. J Leukoc Biol. 2002;72:847–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Martin T, Cardarelli PM, Parry GC, Felts KA, Cobb RR. Cytokine induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene expression in human endothelial cells depends on the cooperative action of NF-kappa B and AP-1. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27:1091–7. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830270508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ueda A, Okuda K, Ohno S, Shirai A, Igarashi T, Matsunaga K, Fukushima J, Kawamoto S, Ishigatsubo Y, Okubo T. NF-kappa B and Sp1 regulate transcription of the human monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene. J Immunol. 1994;153:2052–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Horwitz MS. Function of adenovirus E3 proteins and their interactions with immunoregulatory cell proteins. J Gene Med. 2004;6(Suppl 1):S172–83. doi: 10.1002/jgm.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lesokhin AM, Delgado-Lopez F, Horwitz MS. Inhibition of chemokine expression by adenovirus early region three (E3) genes. Journal of Virology. 2002;76:8236–8243. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.16.8236-8243.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schmitz ML, Indorf A, Limbourg FP, Stadtler H, Traenckner EB, Baeuerle PA. The dual effect of adenovirus type 5 E1A 13S protein on NF-kappaB activation is antagonized by E1B 19K. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:4052–63. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.8.4052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Deryckere F, Burgert HG. Tumor necrosis factor alpha induces the adenovirus early 3 promoter by activation of NF-kappaB. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:30249–55. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.47.30249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Heise C, Hermiston T, Johnson L, Brooks G, Sampson-Johannes A, Williams A, Hawkins L, Kirn D. An adenovirus E1A mutant that demonstrates potent and selective systemic anti-tumoral efficacy. Nat Med. 2000;6:1134–9. doi: 10.1038/80474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:787–95. doi: 10.1172/JCI59643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lin WW, Karin M. A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1175–83. doi: 10.1172/JCI31537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mantovani A, Savino B, Locati M, Zammataro L, Allavena P, Bonecchi R. The chemokine system in cancer biology and therapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21:27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hayden MS, Ghosh S. NF-kappaB, the first quarter-century: remarkable progress and outstanding questions. Genes Dev. 2012;26:203–34. doi: 10.1101/gad.183434.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pacifico F, Leonardi A. Role of NF-kappaB in thyroid cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;321:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sakamoto K, Maeda S. Targeting NF-kappaB for colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2010;14:593–601. doi: 10.1517/14728221003769903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shostak K, Chariot A. NF-kappaB, stem cells and breast cancer: the links get stronger. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:214. doi: 10.1186/bcr2886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Angarita FA, Acuna SA, Ottolino-Perry K, Zerhouni S, McCart JA. Mounting a strategic offense: fighting tumor vasculature with oncolytic viruses. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19:378–92. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Saito Y, Sunamura M, Motoi F, Abe H, Egawa S, Duda DG, Hoshida T, Fukuyama S, Hamada H, Matsuno S. Oncolytic replication-competent adenovirus suppresses tumor angiogenesis through preserved E1A region. Cancer Gene Ther. 2006;13:242–52. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ikeda Y, Kojima T, Kuroda S, Endo Y, Sakai R, Hioki M, Kishimoto H, Uno F, Kagawa S, Watanabe Y, Hashimoto Y, Urata Y, Tanaka N, et al. A novel antiangiogenic effect for telomerase-specific virotherapy through host immune system. J Immunol. 2009;182:1763–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.3.1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Allavena P, Mantovani A. Immunology in the clinic review series; focus on cancer: tumour-associated macrophages: undisputed stars of the inflammatory tumour microenvironment. Clin Exp Immunol. 2012;167:195–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04515.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Qian BZ, Pollard JW. Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell. 2010;141:39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ruffell B, Coussens LM. Macrophages and therapeutic resistance in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:462–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wang Y, Hallden G, Hill R, Anand A, Liu TC, Francis J, Brooks G, Lemoine N, Kirn D. E3 gene manipulations affect oncolytic adenovirus activity in immunocompetent tumor models. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:1328–35. doi: 10.1038/nbt887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dima M, Miller KA, Antico-Arciuch VG, Di Cristofano A. Establishment and characterization of cell lines from a novel mouse model of poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma: powerful tools for basic and preclinical research. Thyroid. 2011;21:1001–7. doi: 10.1089/thy.2011.0030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Galluzzi L, Vacchelli E, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Buque A, Senovilla L, Baracco EE, Bloy N, Castoldi F, Abastado JP, Agostinis P, Apte RN, Aranda F, Ayyoub M, et al. Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies. Oncotarget. 2014;5:12472–508. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Schweppe RE, Klopper JP, Korch C, Pugazhenthi U, Benezra M, Knauf JA, Fagin JA, Marlow LA, Copland JA, Smallridge RC, Haugen BR. Deoxyribonucleic acid profiling analysis of 40 human thyroid cancer cell lines reveals cross-contamination resulting in cell line redundancy and misidentification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4331–41. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Libertini S, Iacuzzo I, Ferraro A, Vitale M, Bifulco M, Fusco A, Portella G. Lovastatin enhances the replication of the oncolytic adenovirus dl1520 and its antineoplastic activity against anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells. Endocrinology. 2007;148:5186–94. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jiang H, Gomez-Manzano C, Alemany R, Medrano D, Alonso M, Bekele BN, Lin E, Conrad CC, Yung WK, Fueyo J. Comparative effect of oncolytic adenoviruses with E1A-55 kDa or E1B-55 kDa deletions in malignant gliomas. Neoplasia. 2005;7:48–56. doi: 10.1593/neo.04391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Guidolin D, Vacca A, Nussdorfer GG, Ribatti D. A new image analysis method based on topological and fractal parameters to evaluate the angiostatic activity of docetaxel by using the Matrigel assay in vitro. Microvasc Res. 2004;67:117–24. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2003.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Esposito F, Libertini S, Franco R, Abagnale A, Marra L, Portella G, Chieffi P. Aurora B expression in post-puberal testicular germ cell tumours. J Cell Physiol. 2009;221:435–9. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

oncotarget-07-1500-s001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES