Skip to main content
Molecular and Clinical Oncology logoLink to Molecular and Clinical Oncology
. 2016 Jan 26;4(4):587–590. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.742

Combined detection of liver stiffness and C-reactive protein in patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis, with and without hepatocellular carcinoma

XIAO-YAN LIU 1,*, LI-NA MA 1,*, TING-TING YAN 2,*, ZHEN-HUI LU 3,*, YUAN-YUAN TANG 1,*, XIA LUO 1,*, XIANG-CHUN DING 1,
PMCID: PMC4812173  PMID: 27073669

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of combined detection of liver stiffness (LS) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver cirrhosis (LC). A total of 156 cases of previously untreated patients with HBV-related LC were classified into the LC group [LC without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)] and the HCC group (LC with HCC). Comparative analyses of LS and serum CRP level were conducted between these two groups. LS values and serum CRP levels were found to be significantly higher in the HCC group compared with those in the LC group (P<0.01). The LS values and serum CRP levels were not significantly different between α-fetoprotein (AFP)-positive and -negative patients. A high LS value was a high-risk factor for HCC in patients with chronic hepatitis B. The CRP-positive rate was significantly higher in the HCC group compared with that in LC group in a subset of patients with high LS values (P<0.01). In conclusion, the combined detection of LS and serum CRP may complement the measurement of AFP in the diagnosis of HBV-related HCC, improve the identification of patients with AFP-negative HCC and help distinguish HCC from LC.

Keywords: chronic hepatitis B, liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, FibroScan, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary malignancy of the liver (1) and a prevalent malignancy with poor outcome. Approximately 600,000 new cases are diagnosed annually, among which 55% in China (2). The majority of HCC cases (~80%) are associated with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection-related liver cirrhosis (LC) (3,4). The main treatment used for primary liver cancer is surgery. Asian series have reported a 5-year survival rate of ~70% following resection of HCCs sized <2 cm, while the current 5-year survival rate of advanced liver cancer is ~10%, only marginally better compared with that of pancreatic cancer (5). Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial for improving the survival rate of patients with primary liver cancer. However, due to the lack of effective methods for early diagnosis, only 30–40% of patients with primary liver cancer are timely diagnosed and treated at an early stage. The measurement of α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels is widely used as a surveillance test for HCC (6). Several studies of AFP in HCC surveillance revealed that its sensitivity is estimated at 39–64%, its specificity at 76–91%, its positive predictive value at 9–32% and its negative value at ≤30% (6). The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of ultrasound for HCC have been reported to be 71–78, 90–93 and 14–73%, respectively. Adding ultrasound to AFP measurement in the screening of individuals at higher risk of liver cancer may significantly increase the early diagnosis rate; approximately one-third of the patients may be diagnosed and treated at an early stage. Despite the large number of studies on the immunohistochemistry of HCC, such as AFP-L3, α1,6-fucosyltransferase, glypican-3, Dickkopf-1 and heat shock protein 70 (7), absolute positive and negative markers for HCC are still lacking, and even those characterized by very high sensitivity and specificity do not exhibit universal diagnostic usefulness. Therefore, the diagnosis of HCC at an early stage remains a prerequisite for favorable prognosis.

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography (TE FibroScan®; Echosens, Paris, France) has been shown to be correlated with liver fibrosis in various chronic liver diseases (811). LSM correlates well with the stage of liver fibrosis and may serve as a predictor of HCC development among patients with chronic hepatitis (1216). It remains questionable whether LSM alone may be applied as a predictive marker of primary liver cancer at the clinical setting. Therefore, it is necessary to identify markers that may be combined with liver stiffness (LS) to improve the prediction of HCC.

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase protein synthesized by the liver. Rapid, marked increases in CRP levels occur with inflammation, infection, trauma and tissue necrosis (1721). Several studies have been performed on the association of CRP with the severity of inflammation in liver disease, such as fatty liver and chronic hepatitis C (2225). A persistently elevated CRP level following initial treatment is an independent marker of a poor prognosis, and normalization of the CRP level after initial treatment is associated with improved outcome in HCC patients (2628). As regards the ability of CRP to predict HBV-related HCC, it remains unknown. A total of 156 LC cases with and without HCC were compared in terms of LS and high-sensitivity CPR (hs-CRP), to investigate the potential of combined detection of LS and serum CRP level in the diagnosis of HCC in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Patients and methods

Patients

A total of 156 patients with HBV-related LC in our hospital were included in this study. The patients were divided into the LC group (LC without HCC) and the HCC group (LC with HCC). These cases were confirmed by clinical presentation, diagnostic ultrasound imaging and laboratory diagnosis. LC was diagnosed according to the guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B, 2010 version (29); HCC was diagnosed according to the criteria formulated by the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association. All the included patients had not been treated with any hepatoprotective, antifibrotic or antiviral drugs. In addition, 50 healthy individuals, without autoimmune or metabolic diseases, without a history of drug or alcohol abuse or other factors that may cause liver damage, and without hematological diseases, were used as the control group. Patients with conditions likely to affect the serum CRP level, such as acute infections, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, asthma, chronic lung disease, myocardial infarction and stroke, were excluded.

Parameters

LSM

Scanning was performed using transient elastography FibroScan® (Echosens) according to the method described in the manufacturer's instructions. The LS grading criteria were as follows: >17.5 kPa cirrhosis; patients were subgrouped with a 5-kPa interval into 17.5–22.5, 22.6–27.5 and >27.6 kPa groups.

Serum CRP levels

Measurement was performed using the latex enhanced turbidimetric method with the reagent purchased from Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Mannheim, Germany) using the Roche Modular P800 analyzer. The serum CRP normal reference range was 0–2.87 mg/l, with serum hs-CRP >2.87 mg/l considered as positive.

AFP. The plasma levels of AFP were measured using a commercial ELISA kit (Abbott Laboratories Company, Chicago, IL, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The HCC group was divided into AFP-positive (>20 ng/ml) and -negative (≤20 ng/ml).

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS v.17.0 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative data were analyzed using the independent-samples t-test and expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The count data were analyzed using the χ2 test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Correlation analyses were conducted using the Pearson's and Spearman's correlation tests.

Results

Clinical data

A total of 156 cases of previously untreated patients with LC were included, 125 of whom were men and 31 were women (mean age, 38±17.1 years). The patients were divided into the LC group (LC without HCC, n=89) and the HCC group (LC with HCC, n=67). Of the 50 healthy controls, 41 were men and 9 were women (mean age, 38±9.4 years). The LSM values and serum CRP levels were found to be significantly higher in the HCC group compared with those in the LC group (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively; Table I).

Table I.

LSM values and serum hs-CRP levels (mean ± SD).

Groups No. hs-CRP (mg/l) LSM values (kPa)
Healthy 50 0.78±1.07 4.25±0.74
LC 89 9.47±19.56 27.81±18.46
HCC 67 30.78±15.17 39.72±29.05
t-test −0.964 −1.735
P-value     0.0337     0.0093

LSM, liver stiffness measurement; LC, liver cirrhosis; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

Comparisons of LSM values and serum CRP levels in AFP-positive and -negative patients

The HCC group was subdivided into the AFP-positive (AFP >20 ng/ml) and AFP-negative (AFP ≤20 ng/ml) groups. The LSM values and serum CRP levels were not significantly different between AFP-positive and -negative patients (P>0.05, Table II).

Table II.

LSM values and serum hs-CRP levels in AFP-positive and -negative patients (mean ± SD).

AFP status No. hs-CRP (mg/ml) LSM values (kPa)
Positive 35 13.58±27.16 48.95±28.59
Negative 32 8.66±17.72 28.64±26.83
t-test 0.815 1.706
P-value 0.419 1.104

LSM, liver stiffness measurement; AFP, α-fetoprotein; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Association of LSM values and serum CRP levels with HCC

The proportional analysis of HCC and CRP positivity rate among 3 stratifications of LSM revealed that a high LSM value was a high-risk factor for HCC. In a subset of patients with LSM values >27.6 kPa, the CRP positivity rate was significantly higher in the HCC group (64.15%) compared with that in the LC group (37.97%) (P<0.01, Table III).

Table III.

Proportion analysis of HCC, LSM grade and serum hs-CRP positivity rate.

LC group HCC group


LSM grade (kPa) Case (no.) CRP+, no. (%) CRP, no. (%) CRP+, no. (%) CRP, no. (%)
17.5–22.5 0 0/0 (0.0) 0/0 (0.0) 0/0 (0.0) 0/0 (0.0)
22.6–27.5 24 0/10 (0.0) 10/10 (100.0) 0/14 (0.0) 14/14 (100.0)
>27.6 132 30/79 (37.97) 49/79 (62.03) 34/53 (64.15) 19/53 (35.85)
χ2 test 8.847 24.89
P-value 0.003     0.000

LSM, liver stiffness measurement; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

Discussion

The diagnosis of HCC at an early stage is a prerequisite for improved prognosis. LSM using FibroScan transient elastography has been shown to be correlated with liver fibrosis in various chronic liver diseases. The LSM cut-off value of 17.5 kPa is considered optimal for diagnosing LC (811) and the LSM value is useful in predicting HCC (1216). Among a total of 156 patients with HBV-related cirrhosis, the LSM values were significantly higher in the HCC group (39.72±29.05 kPa) compared with those in the LC group (27.81± 8.46 kPa) (P<0.05). The LSM values were not significantly different between AFP-positive and -negative patients (P>0.05). The cut-off value was set at 17.5 kPa, and patients were subgrouped with a 5-kPa interval into the 17.5–22.5, 22.6–27.5 and >27.6 kPa groups. This subgroup analysis revealed that a high LSM value (>27.6 kPa) was a high-risk factor for HCC, which was consistent with earlier findings, indicating the usefulness of LSM in predicting HCC. Furthermore, it was observed that 59.85% of patients with LSM values of >27.6 kPa did not have HCC. This positive predictive value was significantly lower compared with that of ultrasound combined with AFP. Therefore, it is necessary to identify markers to combine with LS in order to improve the prediction of HCC.

The majority of the cases of HCC are associated with cirrhosis related to chronic hepatitis (1,3,9). CRP is an acute-phase protein synthesized by the liver. Several studies have been performed to determine the association of CRP with the severity of inflammation in liver diseases, such as fatty liver and chronic hepatitis C. A persistently elevated CRP level following initial treatment is an independent marker of a poor prognosis, and normalization of the CRP level after initial treatment is associated with an improved outcome in HCC patients (1729). We observed that serum CRP levels were significantly higher in the HCC group (30.78±15.17 mg/l) compared with those in the LC group (9.47±19.56 mg/l) (P<0.01), whereas they were not significantly different between AFP-positive and -negative patients (P>0.05). These results may be explained by the fact that AFP-positive HCC patients may have larger tumors and exhibit more severe inflammation due to the invasion of the portal system. The cut-off value for LSM was set at 17.5 kPa, and patients were subgrouped with a 5-kPa interval into 17.5–22.5, 22.6–27.5 and >27.6 kPa groups. Patients with serum CRP levels >2.87 mg/l were defined as positive, whereas those with serum CRP levels <2.87 mg/l were defined as negative. A proportion analysis was performed of HCC and serum CRP positivity rate among the 3 LSM grades. It was demonstrated that a high LSM value was a high-risk factor for HCC. In a subset of patients with LSM values >27.6 kPa, the CRP positivity rate was significantly higher in the HCC group (64.15%) compared with that in the LC group (37.97%) (P<0.01). These results demonstrate the association of HCC with combined detection of LS and serum CRP.

In conclusion, the combined detection of LS and serum CRP may complement the measurement of AFP level in the diagnosis of HBV-related HCC, facilitate the identification of patients with AFP-negative HCC, and help distinguish HCC from LC.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81460301), the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia (grant nos. NZ09115 and NZ11199), and the Scientific and Technological Foundation of Ningxia and Chinese Foundation for Hepatitis Wang Bao-En Liver Fibrosis Fund (grant no. xjs).

Glossary

Abbreviations

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

HBV

hepatitis B virus

CRP

C-reactive protein

LSM

liver stiffness measure

CHB

chronic hepatitis B

References

  • 1.El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1264–1273. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Luk JM, Liu AM. Proteomics of hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese patients. OMICS. 2011;15:261–266. doi: 10.1089/omi.2010.0099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lin CL, Kao JH. Risk Stratification for hepatitis B virus related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:10–17. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gao Y, Jiang Q, Zhou X, Ding B, Wang R, Zhao G, Chen Y. HBV infection and familial aggregation of liver cancer: An analysis of case-control family study. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15:845–850. doi: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000043435.59195.3c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cabrera R, Fitian AI, Ararat M, Xu Y, Brusko T, Wasserfall C, Atkinson MA, Liu C, Nelson DR. Serum levels of soluble CD25 as a marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2012;4:840–846. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Masuzaki R, Karp SJ, Omata M. New serum markers of hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Oncol. 2012;39:434–439. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2012.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marcellin P, Ziol M, Bedossa P, Douvin C, Poupon R, de Lédinghen V, Beaugrand M. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis by stiffness measurement in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int. 2009;29:242–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01802.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.do Kim Y, Kim SU, Ahn SH, Park JY, Lee JM, Park YN, Yoon KT, Paik YH, Lee KS, Chon CY, et al. Usefulness of FibroScan for detection of early compensated liver cirrhosisin chronic hepatitis B. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:1758–1763. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0541-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chan HL, Wong GL, Choi PC, Chan AW, Chim AM, Yiu KK, Chan FK, Sung JJ, Wong VW. Alanine aminotransferase-based algorithms of liver stiffness measurement by transient elastography (Fibroscan) for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2009;16:36–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.01037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vizzutti FI, Arena U, Romanelli RG, Rega L, Foschi M, Colagrande S, Petrarca A, Moscarella S, Belli G, Zignego AL, et al. Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. Hepatolog. 2007;45:1290–1297. doi: 10.1002/hep.21665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cescon M, Colecchia A, Cucchetti A, Peri E, Montrone L, Ercolani G, Festi D, Pinna AD. Value of transient elastography measured with FibroScan in predicting the outcome of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2012;256:706–712. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182724ce8. discussion 712–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Masuzaki R, Tateishi R, Yoshida H, Goto E, Sato T, Ohki T, Imamura J, Goto T, Kanai F, Kato N, et al. Prospective risk assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis C by transient elastography. Hepatology. 2009;49:1954–1961. doi: 10.1002/hep.22870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jung KS, Kim SU, Ahn SH, Park YN, do Kim Y, Park JY, Chon CY, Choi EH, Han KH. Risk assessment of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma development using liver stiffness measurement (FibroScan) Hepatology. 2011;53:885–894. doi: 10.1002/hep.24121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fung J, Lai CL, Seto WK, Wong DK, Yuen MF. Prognostic significance of liver stiffness for hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18:738–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01355.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chon YE, Jung ES, Park JY, do Kim Y, Ahn SH, Han KH, Chon CY, Jung KS, Kim SU. The accuracy of noninvasive methods in predicting the development of hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic decompensation in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:518–525. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31825079f1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shameem M, Bhargava R, Ahmad Z, Saad T, Fatima N, Malik A. Association between serum C-reactive protein levels and other important predictive markers of outcome in COPD. Acta Med Iran. 2011;49:18–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tasxi C, Balkan A, Karadurmus N, Inal S, Kilic S, Ozkan M, Bilgic H, Ekiz K. The importance of serum procalcitonin levels in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Turk J Med Sci. 2008;38:139–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Garcia-Rio F, Miravitlles M, Soriano JB, Muñoz L, Duran-Tauleria E, Sánchez G, Sobradillo V, Ancochea J. EPI-SCAN Steering Committee: Systemic inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A population-based study. Respir Res. 2008;11:63. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Peisajovich A, Marnell L, Mold C, Du Clos TW. C-reactive protein at the interface between innate immunity and inflammation. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2008;4:379–390. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.4.3.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dinarello CA. The acute phase response. In: Bennett JC, Plum F, editors. Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 20th. WB Saunders Co.; 1996. pp. 1535–1537. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Andreozzi P, Viscogliosi G, Colella F, Subic M, Cipriani E, Marigliano B, Verrusio W, Servello A, Ettorre E, Marigliano V. Predictors of liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The role of metabolic syndrome, insulin-resistance and inflammation. Recenti Prog Med. 2012;103:570–574. doi: 10.1701/1206.13358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ma LN, Liu XY, Luo X, Hu YC, Liu SW, Tang YY, Pan JL, Ding XC. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein are associated with HBV replication, liver damage and fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatogastroenterology. 2015;62:368–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Atta M, Cabral M, Santos G, Paraná R, Atta A. Inflammation biomarkers in chronic hepatitis C: Association with liver histopathology, HCV genotype and cryoglobulinemia. Inflamm Res. 2012;61:1101–1106. doi: 10.1007/s00011-012-0502-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sjöwall CI, Cardell K, Boström EA, Bokarewa MI, Enocsson H, Ekstedt M, Lindvall L, Frydén A, Almer S. High prevalence of autoantibodies to C-reactive protein in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection: association with liver fibrosis and portal inflammation. Hum Immunol. 2012;73:382–388. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2012.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nishikawa H, Arimoto A, Wakasa T, Kita R, Kimura T, Osaki Y. Pre-treatment C-reactive protein as a prognostic factor for recurrence after surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer research. 2013;33:1181–1188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen W, Wang JB, Abnet CC, Dawsey SM, Fan JH, Yin LY, Yin J, Taylor PR, Qiao YL, Freedman ND. Association between C-reactive protein, incident liver cancer, and chronic liver disease mortality in the Linxian Nutrition Intervention Trials: A nested case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015;24:386–392. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhao X, Luo J, Li B, Liu S, Li D. The association between preoperative serum C-reactive protein and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection-a retrospective study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chinese Society of Hepatology and Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association: The guideline of prevention and treatment for chronic hepatitis B (2010 version) Chin J Hepatol. 2011;19:13–24. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2011.01.007. (In Chinese) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES