Over-expression of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) in some cancer cells is a primary cause of multidrug resistance (MDR) that results in chemotherapy failure. As a consequence, Pgp has been a long-sought target for drug development in the hope of circumventing MDR in clinical oncology.[1,2] More than three decades of biochemical studies have indicated that Pgp might possess several distinct substrate-binding sites within a large, flexible region located between the two transmembrane domains; these sites recognize hundreds of chemically unrelated compounds, including a majority of traditional anti-cancer drugs.[3–6] These compounds can be exported from cells by Pgp using energy released by self-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis in conjunction with substantial conformational changes. Our groups recently determined a structure of mouse Pgp at 3.8 Å resolution by X-ray diffraction.[7] We also solved the cocrystal structures of Pgp with a pair of enantiomeric cyclic peptides, QZ59Se-RRR and QZ59Se-SSS (Scheme 1), in which the two enantiomers bind to Pgp with different stoichiometries and at distinct sites within a transmembrane portal open to the cytoplasmic side. These structures provided the first glimpse of the polyspecific drug-binding site of Pgp in atomic detail.
Scheme 1.

Constraining the conformation of cyclic peptide ligands to facilitate cocrystallization with Pgp. Structures of macrocyclic peptides cyclosporin A and PSC 833 are shown on the left. In the middle are natural products dendroamide A and patellamide C, wherein the presence of heterocycles further constrains the flexibility of these smaller cyclopeptides. On the right are enantiomeric cyclic peptides QZ59Se-SSS and QZ59Se-RRR in which three selenium atoms (in dark circles) were decorated as X-ray-anomalous scattering markers to facilitate the identification and modeling of bound ligands.
Scheme 1 outlines our strategies for the design and synthesis of selenium (Se)-labeled cyclic peptides that were crucial to the successful cocrystallization with Pgp for X-ray structure determination. Our early attempts to cocrystallize Pgp with several well-studied modulators, including cyclosporin A[8,9] and the cyclosporin derivative PSC 833[10] were unsuccessful. Cyclosporin A and PSC 833 are both macrocyclic undecamer peptides the solution-phase conformations of which are flexible.[11,12] We assume that this conformational flexibility disfavored cocrystallization of these bound ligands within the flexible binding region of the highly dynamic Pgp molecule. Several smaller cyclic peptides such as dendroamide A[13] and patellamide C[14] isolated from marine cyanobacteria have been reported to have MDR reversal activity, although with less potency than cyclosporin peptides. Structurally, these natural products feature the presence of amino acid derived heterocycles, such as thiazoles, oxazoles, thiazolines, and oxazolines. These five-membered heterocycles can be regarded as constraining rings that further restrict the rotational freedom of bonds in the cyclopeptide backbone. We supposed that optimization of these rigid cyclopeptides might yield compounds more readily co-crystallizable with Pgp by reducing entropy cost for binding.
As with many other membrane proteins, highly diffracting crystals of Pgp had not been grown, which presented another significant challenge to ligand-binding site identification and accurate modeling of ligand position once cocrystals were obtained. Decorating the ligands with X-ray-anomalous scattering markers will provide fiducials useful for structure determination. Thus, we designed novel selenazole-containing peptide ligands for Pgp in which Se atoms replaced sulfur or oxygen atoms in the original thiazole or oxazole rings (Scheme 1). The identification of anomalous Fourier peaks in the density map corresponding to the three Se atoms in QZ59Se-SSS and QZ59Se-RRR enabled more accurate positioning of the bound ligands.
Although methodologies for oxazole[15] and thiazole[16–19] synthesis are well documented, reports of selenazole synthesis appear relatively rarely, and most have employed procedures analogous to the Hantzsch synthesis of thiazoles starting from selenamides.[20,21] In our earlier report, we had synthesized racemic selenazole-containing amino acid ±3c by refluxing selenamides with ethyl bromopyruvate (EBP) in the presence of pyridine in ethanol. Accordingly, QZ59Se-RRR and QZ59Se-SSS were isolated from a mixture of racemic products by a combination of reversed-phase and chiral HPLC purification.[7] This purification procedure was time-consuming and yielded only small amounts of the final products. To expand our capacity to synthesize diverse Se-labeled peptides for ongoing structural studies directed at mapping the flexible binding sites of Pgp, developing a more efficient procedure for the preparation of optically pure selenazole-containing peptides was highly desirable.
We have found that synthesis of selenazole-containing peptides was hindered by low yield and irreproducibility even by using optimized Hantzsch-thiazole synthesis procedures.[19,22,23] We overcame these problems by making several important modifications. Compared to thioamides, which can be readily prepared and isolated from the reaction of primary amides with Lawesson’s reagent, aliphatic selenamides were unstable during purification[24] after being prepared by refluxing the mixture of P2Se5 and the amino acid derived nitriles 1a–t in ethanol–H2O. The isolated yield was typically lower than 50% in our trials. Therefore, simple filtration and rapid concentration were carried out upon completion of the transformation. The crude selenamides 2a–t were subsequently reacted with EBP for 5 min in the presence of excess KHCO3 in DMF at −20°C. Dehydration was followed by addition of trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) to the reaction mixtures to yield the aromatized selenazoles (Table 1). A major modification here, compared to literature procedures for thiazole synthesis,[19,22,23] is the omission of an organic base (typically 2,6-lutidine) during the dehydration step. This modification appeared to be important for suppressing racemization of the final products. For example, including 2,6-lutidine as a second base led to the synthesis of (S)-alanine-selenazole 3a in enantiomeric excess (ee) of only 87%, whereas 97% ee was achieved under our optimized conditions (Table 1, entry 1). Most recently we have found that room temperature reactions in steps 2 and 3 gave similar results without compromising enantioselectivity (Table 1, entries 1 and 3), which is distinct from the previously reported thiazole synthesis in which it was critical to maintain the reaction of thioamides and EBP at low temperature (< −15 °C).[22,23]
Table 1.
Synthesis of optically pure selenazole-containing amino acids.
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | Product | Yield [%][a] | ee[b] | R | Product | Yield [%][a] | ee[b] | ||
| 1 | Me | 3a | 51 46 |
97 96[c] |
11 |
|
3k | 53 | 97 |
| 2 | H | 3b | 52 | – | 12 |
|
3l | 51 | 99 |
| 3 | iPr | 3c | 73 68 |
>99 >99[c] |
13 |
|
3m | 49 | >99 |
| 4 | iBu | 3d | 72 | 99 | 14 |
|
3n | 71 | >99 |
| 5 |
|
3e | 71 | >99[d,e] | 15 |
|
3o | 32 | >99[d] |
| 6 |
|
3f | 71 | >99 | 16 |
|
3p | 39 | 99 |
| 7 |
|
3g | 72 | 98 | 17 |
|
3q | 32 | 99 |
| 8 |
|
3h | 67 | 99 | 18 |
|
3r | 74 | 99 |
| 9 |
|
3i | 72 | 100[f] | 19 |
|
3s R′=H |
48 | 79[d,g] |
| 10 |
|
|
74 | >99 | 20 |
|
3t[e] |
47 | 98 |
Isolated yield for three steps.
ee values were determined by using a ChiralPak AD-H column unless otherwise noted. The eluent was 1:9 iPrOH/hexane with a flow rate of 1 mL/min, unless otherwise noted.
Steps 2 and 3 were carried out at RT.
Optical purity was determined by ChiralPak OD-H column.
By using an eluent of 4% iPrOH in hexane.
Very minor diastereomer was removed by silica gel chromatography.
Gradient elution from 4% to 10% of iPrOH in hexane.
EtOH, overnight.
We have applied the above procedure to the synthesis of all 20 natural amino acid derived selenazoles 3a–t (Table 1). To confirm the ee value of each product (except for glycine derivative, entry 2), the corresponding racemic (or partially racemized) selenazoles were prepared according to a previously published procedure.[7] Overall yields for the three-step and two-pot reactions were generally satisfactory for aliphatic and aromatic amino acid derivatives, but the yield was lower for several polar amino acid derivatives. Most importantly, little or no racemization occurred in the final products except for histidine-derived selenazole (79% ee, entry 19). It is notable that this procedure tolerated amino acid side chains with common protecting groups. In entry 19, the tert-butyloxycarbonyl (t-Boc) protective group on the imidazole ring was found to be eliminated under conditions of selenation (the first step). Changing the t-Boc group to tosyl (Ts) also produced a deprotected product. The starting nitrile 1s was enantiomerically pure according to chiral HPLC analysis (Supporting Information). Partial racemization in this case likely occurred during the dehydration step, which can be explained by the promotion of intramolecular deprotonation at the adjacent chiral α-carbon by the basic imidazole moiety. For arginine-derived substrate (entry 20), trifluoroacetylation of the guanidino group was observed in the final product, but this modification could be easily removed by dissolving the product in ethanol and allowing it to stand overnight.
Having used the above procedures to prepare optically pure (S)- and (R)-valine-selenazoles, we synthesized the cyclic tripeptides QZ59Se-SSS and QZ59Se-RRR, together with two other stereoisomers QZ59Se-RRS and QZ59Se-SSR, as well as two homochiral tetrameric cyclic peptides QZ60Se-RRRR and QZ60Se-SSSS (Scheme 2 and Figure 1A). Corresponding thiazole analogues were also prepared by similar means.[25,26] The homochiral tri- and tetrapeptides were synthesized by one-step cyclization of the respective amino acid units. Other trimeric peptide stereoisomers were synthesized by recursive coupling of corresponding monomeric units and final macrocyclization (Scheme 2). By comparing with the individually prepared molecules from optically pure selenazole amino acids in this study, we further verified the identity and the absolute stereochemistry of QZ59Se-RRR and QZ59Se-SSS previously isolated from racemic mixtures for cocrystallization studies.[7]
Scheme 2.

Synthesis of trimeric and tetrameric cyclic peptides from optically pure selenazole amino acids in the solution phase. Synthetic routes were illustrated for QZ59Se-RRS (bottom) and the homochiral cyclic peptides QZ59Se-SSS and QZ60Se-SSSS (top). The synthesis of QZ59Se-SSR, QZ59Se-RRR, and QZ60Se-RRRR was similar to that of QZ59Se-RRS, QZ59Se-SSS and QZ60Se-SSSS, respectively. d) HOBt, HBTU, DIEA, DMF, 84%; e) PyBop, DMAP, 78%.a) NaOH, THF/MeOH/H2O; b) TFA/CH2Cl2; c) FDPP, DIEA, CH3CN; d) +HOBt, HBTU, DIEA, DMF (84%); e) PyBop, DMAP (78 %).
Figure 1.

A) Stereospecific chemical structures of trimeric and tetrameric cyclic peptides comprised of valine-selenazole/thiazole units. B) Inhibition of Pgp-mediated calcein-AM transport by selenium-labeled cyclopeptides, or C) by their sulfur analogues, occurred with similar IC50 values. The means and standard deviations obtained from two independent, quadruplet experiments are shown, and each line represents a fit to the Hill equation.
Next, we evaluated the inhibitory activity of Pgp for each of these selenazole/thiazole-containing cyclic peptides in Figure 1A by using a commonly used calcein acetoxymethyl ester (calcein-AM) transport assay in Pgp-overexpressing CR1R12 cells.[7,27] The resulting IC50 values determined for the selenazole-containing peptides were 2.1±0.1 μm (QZ59Se-SSS), 7.0±0.1 μM (QZ59Se-RRR), 13.1±2.9 μM (QZ59Se-RRS), 20.2±2.3 μM (QZ59Se-SSR), 32.9±7.0 μM (QZ60Se-RRRR), and 67.8±8.8 μM (QZ60Se-SSSS; Figure 1B). For the thiazole peptides, the IC50 values were 2.7±0.2 μM (QZ59S-SSS), 8.4±0.8 μM (QZ59S-RRR), 15.9±0.9 μM (QZ59S-RRS), 13.8±0.7 μM (QZ59S-SSR), 19.7±3.6 μM (QZ60S-RRRR) and 26.7±3.9 μM (QZ60S-SSSS; Figure 1C). Overall, the potency of the selenazole and thiazole analogues followed a trend according to the ring size and stereochemistry, with the cyclic tripeptides QZ59Se/S-SSS being the most potent and tetrapeptides QZ60Se/S-SSSS being the least potent. However, there are noteworthy differences in IC50 values between S- and Se-cyclopeptides having the same stereoconfiguration. For instance, in the selenazole series, the SSR isomer is somewhat less potent than its RRS-counterpart, whereas in the thiazole series the SSR-isomer is slightly more potent than the RRS-isomer. With regards to the tetrapeptides, QZ60Se-RRRR is doubly as potent as its SSSS enantiomer, whereas the corresponding thiazole analogues show similar IC50 values. We currently do not have a clear explanation for the observed differences in the above IC50 measurements between S and Se analogues, which will be the subject of future studies. But overall, substituting Se for S in our cyclic peptides does not change the IC50 pattern very much, which indicated that this replacement could be an effective strategy for designing natural product analogues for X-ray structural studies.
The work described here is directed toward the development of compounds with which to study the polyspecific binding sites of Pgp by X-ray crystallography. By using the methodology that we have established for the synthesis of optically pure selenazoles, a large number of structurally diverse Se-labeled cyclopeptides including natural product mimetics could potentially be assembled. Structural and functional studies of these new compounds might help to further elucidate the molecular basis for polyspecific substrate binding and transport function of Pgp. Of note, this structure-based approach is clearly distinct from the majority of efforts to design new drug candidates that tend to emphasize criteria such as specificity and toxicity. On the other hand, studying Pgp–ligand interactions will facilitate the development of more potent and Pgp-specific modulators and ultimately more effective therapies to overcome devastating MDR. Because thiazole or oxazole structures are abundant in natural products that are leads for many drug development programs,[28] the synthesis of unnatural selenazole analogues might also have direct applications in drug discovery.
Experimental Section
General procedure for the synthesis of selenazoles (3a–t)
H2O (0.2 mL) was added dropwise to a refluxing solution of nitrile 1 (2.0 mmol) and powdered P2Se5 (460 mg, 1.0 mmol) in EtOH (10 mL). The mixture was stirred under N2 for 2 h. To drive the transformation to completion, more P2Se5 (2×1.0 mmol) was usually added at 1 h intervals, followed by slow addition of H2O (2×0.1 mL). CAUTION! H2Se is produced in situ;[20] this is highly toxic and can decompose into explosive H2 and elemental Se. For safety concerns, we recommend wearing safety goggles and masks with respirator, and running the reactions in small scales (<5 mmol) in a well-ventilated fume hood. After cooling to RT, the reaction mixture was quickly filtered through a patch of silica gel and washed with EtOAc. The filtrate was then concentrated in vacuo. The residue 2 was redissolved in dry DMF (12 mL), and the solution was cooled to −20°C, and KHCO3 (4.6 g, 46 mmol) was added. The resulting suspension was stirred vigorously for 5 min, then ethyl bromopyruvate (90%, 0.5 mL, 3.2 mmol) was added. After an additional 5 min stirring, TFAA (2.8 mL, 20 mmol) was added in one portion (CAUTION! large amounts of CO2 are released). The reaction was quenched by addition of H2O (50 mL). The mixture was extracted with EtOAc (100 mL). The organic phase was washed with brine (50 mL), dried over Na2SO4 and filtered. After removal of solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified by silica gel chromatography to afford the product 3.
Synthesis of cyclic peptides QZ59Se-RRS and QZ59Se-SSR
Treatment of 3c ((S)-Val-selenazole, 188 mg, 0.5 mmol) with TFA (3 mL) in CH2Cl2 (9 mL) removed the N-t-Boc protective group to give the amine (3c-amine). The ethyl ester of ent-3c ((R)-Val-selenazole, 376 mg, 1.0 mmol) was hydrolyzed in a solution of NaOH (320 mg, 8 mmol) in THF/MeOH/H2O (10:2:3) [Eq. (2)]. The resulted acid (ent-3c acid) was dissolved in anhyd DMF (10 mL). Half of this solution (ent-3c acid in 5 mL DMF) was mixed with HOBt (0.21 g, 1.5 mmol), HBTU (0.51 g, 1.5 mmol), and 3c-amine (dissolved in DMF). To this mixture was added iPr2EtN (0.42 mL, 2.4 mmol) with stirring at RT under N2. The reaction was monitored by TLC. Upon completion, the reaction was quenched with aq HCl. The solution was diluted with EtOAc (50 mL), washed with sat. NaHCO3 (50 mL) and brine (50 mL), dried over Na2SO4 and filtered. The solvent was then removed in vacuo, and the residue was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel to provide the dimer 4 (245 mg, 81% yield). ; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=8.76 (s, 1H), 8.73 (s, 1H), 7.98 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 1H), 5.39 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.18 (dd, J=8.6, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (brs, 1H), 4.31 (q, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.72–2.50 (m, 1H), 2.32 (brm, 1H), 1.37 (s, 9H), 1.30 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.01–0.91 (m, 9H), 0.88 ppm (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ=181.7, 179.5, 161.6, 161.5, 155.7, 149.9, 148.2, 134.7, 130.8, 61.4, 60.6, 59.5, 36.7, 32.9, 32.6, 28.3 (3C), 19.9, 19.5, 17.7, 17.3, 14.4 ppm; MS (ESI): m/z: calcd for C23H34N4O5Se2Na: 629.1 [M+Na]+, found: 629.1.
The reaction of 4 (0.25 mmol) with TFA (5 mL) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) afforded an amine in quantitative yield. The amine was then coupled with the remaining half of ent-3c acid under the same conditions used to synthesize 4, which gave the linear trimeric peptide 5 (175 mg, 0.21 mmol). ; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=8.80 (s, 1H), 8.78 (s, 1H), 8.76 (s, 1H), 8.01 (d, J=9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 1H), 5.28–5.21 (m, 3H), 4.78 (brm, 1H), 4.36 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.73–2.60 (m, 1H), 2.62–2.49 (m, 1H), 2.35–2.28 (m, 1H), 1.41 (s, 9H), 1.35 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.06–0.91 (m, 15H), 0.92 ppm (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ=182.2, 180.1, 179.8, 161.8, 161.61 (2C), 161.58, 155.7, 150.3, 148.5, 134.9, 131.2, 131.0, 61.6, 60.8, 59.7, 59.2, 36.9, 33.0, 32.8, 28.5 (3C), 24.9, 20.2, 19.9, 19.7, 17.9, 17.8, 17.6, 14.6 ppm; MS (ESI): m/z: calcd for C31H44N6O6Se3Na: 859.1. [M+Na]+, found: 859.1
Peptide 5 was treated with NaOH to hydrolyze the ethyl ester, then with TFA to remove the N-t-Boc protective group. The residue was dissolved in mixed solvent (DMF/CH2Cl2=2/1, 30 mL), and a solution of PyBop (260 mg, 0.5 mmol) and DMAP (122 mg, 1.0 mmol) in DMF/CH2Cl2 (2:1, 44 mL) was added slowly by using a syringe pump. The reaction mixture was washed successively with aq HCl (1n, 15 mL), sat. NaHCO3 (50 mL) and brine (50 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and filtered. The solvent was then removed in vacuo, and the residue was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel to give QZ59Se-RRS (113 mg, 78%). ; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ=8.91 (s, 1H), 8.82 (s, 1H), 8.81 (s, 1H), 8.39 (d, J=9.6 Hz, 1H), 8.33 (m, 2H), 5.67 (dd, J=9.7, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (dd, J=8.5, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (dd, J=7.1, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.49 (m, 1H), 2.37–2.27 (m, 1H), 2.22 (m, 1H), 1.11 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.08 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.90 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.83 ppm (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ=178.0, 174.9, 173.6, 160.8, 160.7, 160.6, 150.4, 149.8, 149.5, 132.1, 130.7, 130.5, 59.6, 58.9, 58.4, 38.2, 36.1, 33.6, 20.1, 19.7, 18.7, 18.1, 17.7, 15.9 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z: calcd for C24H31N6Se3O3: 690.9948 [M+H]+, found: 690.9959.
Synthesis of QZ59Se-SSR was similar to that of QZ59Se-RRS. QZ59Se-SSR: . The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of QZ59Se-SSR were identical to those of QZ59Se-RRS.
Synthesis of homochiral cyclic peptides QZ59Se-SSS and QZ60Se-SSSS
The ethyl ester of 3c (800 mg, 2.13 mmol) was hydrolyzed in a solution of NaOH (800 mg, 20.0 mmol) in THF/MeOH/H2O (10:2:3). The N-t-Boc protective group was subsequently removed by treatment with TFA (15 mL) in CH2Cl2 (45 mL). After removal of the solvent, the amino acid was directly dissolved in anhydrous MeCN (20 mL), and iPr2EtN(1.4 mL, 8.5 mmol) and pentafluorophenol diphenylphosphinate (FDPP; 1.64 g, 4.3 mmol) were added to the solution at RT under N2. The reaction was monitored by TLC. Upon completion of the reaction, the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was partitioned between CH2Cl2 (45 mL) and H2O (30 mL). The organic phase was washed successively with aq HCl (2 M, 50 mL), aq NaOH (1 M, 2 × 50 mL), H2O (50 mL), and brine (50 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and filtered. The solvent was then removed in vacuo, and the residue was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel to give QZ59Se-SSS (290 mg, 60% yield) and QZ60Se-SSSS (60 mg, 12% yield).
Data for the characterization of QZ59Se-SSS and QZ59Se-RRR have been reported.[7] QZ60Se-SSSS: ; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=8.81 (s, 4H), 7.87 (d, J=9.3 Hz, 4H), 5.31 (dd, J=9.3, 7.0 Hz, 4H), 2.63–2.40 (m, 4H), 1.122 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 12H), 1.119 ppm (d, J=6.6 Hz, 12H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ=176.4, 160.9, 149.1, 132.1, 58.1, 32.9, 20.2, 18.5 ppm; HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z: calcd for C32H41N8Se4O4: 920.9906 [M+H]+, found: 920.9917.
QZ59Se-RRR and QZ60Se-RRRR were synthesized by analogous procedures. QZ60Se-RRRR: . The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of QZ60Se-RRRR are identical to those of QZ60Se-SSSS.
Calcein-AM transport assay
Calcein acetoxymethyl ester (Calcein-AM) is a substrate for export activity of Pgp, and Calcein-AM transport is a commonly used fluorescence-based functional assay. Chinese hamster ovary cells CR1R12 that over-express high levels of Pgp, which accounts for ~20% of the total plasma membrane protein were previously selected in colchicine. CR1R12 and their parental control cells AuxB1 were cultured as described.[27] Briefly, 5×105 CR1R12 cells were pre-incubated with increasing concentrations of cyclopeptide inhibitors for 15 min at RT in culture medium (100 μL). Non-fluorescent calcein-AM (0.25 mm) was added, and the fluorescence intensity of calcein (λex=494 nm, λem=517 nm), the hydrolysis product of calcein-AM in the cytosol, was monitored after 30 min incubation at RT in a FluoroLog-3 fluorimeter (Jobin Yvon Horiba, Edison, USA) equipped with a 96-well plate reader. 100% was the maximum fluorescence seen upon full inhibition of Pgp in CR1R12 cells. The means and standard deviations obtained from two independent, quadruplet experiments were shown in Figure 1, and each line represented a fit to the Hill equation. The compounds had no effect on calcein-AM accumulation in the parental AuxB1 control cells and the relative fluorescence intensities remained constant (100%) over the entire concentration range assayed (data not shown).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank P. Dawson for comment and E. Hildebrandt for editorial assistance.
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201100048.
References
- 1.Szakacs G, Paterson JK, Ludwig JA, Booth-Genthe C, Gottesman MM. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2006;5:219. doi: 10.1038/nrd1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Eckford PD, Sharom FJ. Chem Rev. 2009;109:2989. doi: 10.1021/cr9000226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shapiro AB, Ling V. Eur J Biochem. 1997;250:130. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Loo TW, Bartlett MC, Clarke DM. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:39706. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308559200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Loo TW, Clarke DM. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329:419. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.01.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martin C, Berridge G, Higgins CF, Mistry P, Charlton P, Callaghan R. Mol Pharmacol. 2000;58:624. doi: 10.1124/mol.58.3.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Aller SG, Yu J, Ward A, Weng Y, Chittaboina S, Zhuo R, Harrell PM, Trinh YT, Zhang Q, Urbatsch IL, Chang G. Science. 2009;323:1718. doi: 10.1126/science.1168750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Twentyman PR, Fox NE, White DJG. Br J Cancer. 1987;56:55. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Slater LM, Sweet P, Stupecky M, Gupta S. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:1405. doi: 10.1172/JCI112450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Loor F. Expert Opin Invest Drugs. 1999;8:807. doi: 10.1517/13543784.8.6.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ko SY, Dalvit C. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1992;40:380. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1992.tb00314.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.O’Donohue MF, Burgess AW, Walkinshaw MD, Treutlein HR. Protein Sci. 1995;4:2191. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560041025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ogino J, Moore RE, Patterson GML, Smith CD. J Nat Prod. 1996;59:581. doi: 10.1021/np960178s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fu X, Do T, Schmitz FJ, Andrusevich V, Engel MH. J Nat Prod. 1998;61:1547. doi: 10.1021/np9802872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yeh VSC. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:11995. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wipf P. Chem Rev. 1995;95:2115. [Google Scholar]
- 17.You SL, Razavi H, Kelly JW. Angew Chem. 2003;115:87. doi: 10.1002/anie.200390059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42:83. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Riedrich M, Harkal S, Arndt HD. Angew Chem. 2007;119:2755. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:2701. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Boden CDJ, Pattenden G, Ye T. Synlett. 1995;417 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Geisler K, Pfeiffer WD, Kunzler A, Below H, Bulka E, Langer P. Synthesis. 2004;875 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hennen WJ, Hinshaw BC, Riley TA, Wood SG, Robins RK. J Org Chem. 1985;50:1741. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Merritt EA, Bagley MC. Synthesis. 2007;3535 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Aguilar E, Meyers AI. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:2473. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ogawa A, Miyake J, Karasaki Y, Murai S, Sonoda N. J Org Chem. 1985;50:384. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bertram A, Hannam JS, Jolliffe KA, de Turiso FGL, Pattenden G. Synlett. 1999;11:1723. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bertram A, Maulucci N, New OM, Nor SMM, Pattenden G. Org Biomol Chem. 2007;5:1541. doi: 10.1039/b701999h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.al-Shawi MK, Senior AE. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:4197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bagley MC, Dale JW, Merritt EA, Xiong X. Chem Rev. 2005;105:685. doi: 10.1021/cr0300441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
