Skip to main content
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 2015 Sep 24;24(12):2090–2094. doi: 10.1002/pro.2805

Atypical effect of temperature tuning on the insertion of the catalytic iron−sulfur center in a recombinant [FeFe]‐hydrogenase

Simone Morra 1, Alessandro Cordara 1, Gianfranco Gilardi 1, Francesca Valetti 1,
PMCID: PMC4815232  PMID: 26362685

Abstract

The expression of recombinant [FeFe]‐hydrogenases is an important step for the production of large amount of these enzymes for their exploitation in biotechnology and for the characterization of the protein‐metal cofactor interactions. The correct assembly of the organometallic catalytic site, named H‐cluster, requires a dedicated set of maturases that must be coexpressed in the microbial hosts or used for in vitro assembly of the active enzymes. In this work, the effect of the post‐induction temperature on the recombinant expression of CaHydA [FeFe]‐hydrogenase in E. coli is investigated. The results show a peculiar behavior: the enzyme expression is maximum at lower temperatures (20°C), while the specific activity of the purified CaHydA is higher at higher temperature (30°C), as a consequence of improved protein folding and active site incorporation.

Keywords: [FeFe]‐hydrogenases, recombinant expression, bio‐hydrogen, metalloenzyme

Introduction

[FeFe]‐hydrogenases are the enzymes that reversibly catalyze the production of molecular hydrogen, following the reaction 2H+ + 2e ⇄ H2.1 They are widely distributed among prokaryotes and eukaryotes (both heterotrophic and photosynthetic) and are essential in the energy metabolism of such organisms, being usually involved in the dissipation of excess of reducing equivalents in the cell. A significant biotechnological interest has been directed to their exploitation in new, clean and efficient industrial processes for the production of H2, to be used as a valuable fuel and industrial intermediate.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

The production of [FeFe]‐hydrogenases by recombinant techniques has become relevant for several reasons. First of all, the recombinant techniques allow the manipulation of the protein: (1) by inserting tag sequences that facilitate purification,8, 9, 10 which is highly desirable given the need to work under anaerobic conditions; (2) by inserting single mutations for the study of target residues;11, 12, 13, 14 (3) by generating random mutations for the study of complex features.15, 16, 17, 18, 19 Moreover, recombinant expression usually grants the availability of large amount of enzyme that are required for the characterisation9, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and for the development of possible future applications.5, 6, 25 Recombinant expression has also paved the way to study the mechanisms of the insertion of the catalytic center H‐cluster in the enzyme [FeFe]‐hydrogenases, the so‐called maturation.8, 21, 26, 27, 28, 29

The recombinant systems that have been developed so far are either cell‐hosted or cell‐free. The systems that are cell‐hosted are carried out in three different hosts: Escherichia coli,8, 10, 20, 30 Clostridium acetobutylicum 9, 31 and Shewanella oneidensis.32 The cell‐free systems are based on the in vitro insertion of the H‐cluster into an apo‐[FeFe]‐hydrogenase: in some cases the maturases are added,33, 34, 35, 36 while in others the H‐cluster is inserted as a chemically synthesized complex.37, 38

Given the simplicity and the technological availability of all the components, the expression system for E. coli has been widely developed and used. In previous reports, the effect of several parameters has been optimized, but the temperature was never analyzed in details, as most authors carried out the experiments at room temperature.8, 10, 20

In this work, we report on the effect of the post‐induction temperature on the recombinant expression of Clostridium acetobutylicum CaHydA [FeFe]‐hydrogenase in E. coli with a C‐terminal Strep‐tagII.

Results and Discussion

The effect of the post‐induction temperature was assayed by SDS‐PAGE [Fig. 1(A)] that allows to observe the levels of expression of the maturases CaHydF and CaHydG, as well as western blot stain against Strep‐TagII [Fig. 1(B)] that specifically discriminates the level of CaHydA. From the functional point of view, the total H2 evolution activity was assayed on whole cells by gas chromatography [Fig. 2(A)].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of the post‐induction temperature on the expression levels of CaHydA and its maturases. A: Coomassie stained SDS‐PAGE of whole cells lisates; bands at the molecular weight of CaHydF (46 kDa) and CaHydG (53 kDa) are marked. NI, not induced. B: Western blot against Strep‐tagII; a band at the molecular weight of CaHydA (65 kDa) can be identified.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of the post‐induction temperature on CaHydA hydrogenase activity. A: Total hydrogenase activity of whole cells. B: Specific activity of purified CaHydA (continuous line, filled squares) and yield of pure protein (dashed line, open squares).

These results [Figs. 1(A,B) and 2(A)] clearly show that the amount of the maturases, the amount of CaHydA and the total hydrogenase activity in whole cells reach a maximum at 20°C, suggesting this temperature as the best condition.

To confirm the results observed in whole cells, the enzyme was anaerobically purified by Strep‐tagII affinity chromatography and the yield of pure protein and specific hydrogenase activity were measured as previously described.18

The characterization of the purified enzyme showed that lowering the temperature results in a significant increase of the pure protein yield, similarly to the observation in whole cells, but also a relevant decrease in specific activity [Fig. 2(B)]. The fact that in whole cells the total activity reached a maximum at 20°C is reasonably given by the combination of a very large amount of protein with low activity; on the contrary, at 30°C the amount of protein is much lower, but the specific activity is higher, reaching 1880 ± 108 µmol H2/min/mg protein.

Also, it is important to consider that the purified enzyme obtained by expression at 20°C formed aggregates when the concentration was increased, while the enzyme expressed either at 25°C or 30°C was readily soluble and could be concentrated by ultra‐filtration up to the millimolar range.

The increase in specific activity and solubility at higher expression temperature is probably a result of improved protein folding, iron sulfur clusters incorporation and maturation (i.e., incorporation of the H‐cluster catalytic center). Even if the amount of the maturases CaHydF and CaHydG is lower at 30°C, this might represent the best molar ratios between the proteins, leading to optimal kinetics of the process of the metal center assembly, and availability of the cellular substrates, such as iron and tyrosine, resulting in a high proportion of holo‐CaHydA.

Lowering the post‐induction temperature is a common procedure in recombinant expression of proteins in E. coli, as it usually leads to slower kinetics hence avoiding the formation of inclusion bodies and improving recovery of the target protein.39, 40 Indeed in our case this effect was observed: the protein amount was larger at lower temperatures, but it did not correlate with specific activity, as this is the result of a more complex process, as discussed above. Another possible tuning effect of the temperature might involve endogenous E. coli scaffold proteins for iron‐sulfur cluster biosynthesis, which must be recruited for hydrogenase assembly, either affecting the H‐cluster or the other FeS clusters inserted in this enzyme.41, 42 For example, it was shown that the scaffold protein IscU from Escherichia coli has a tight temperature control with a narrow range of activity.43

The protocol described here, with the expression at 30°C, resulted in the highest specific activity reported so far for the recombinant CaHydA. The H2 evolution rate of 1880 ± 108 µmol H2/min/mg protein, assayed by gas chromatography with 10 mM reduced methyl viologen as artificial electron donor, is in line with the specific activity of other recombinant [FeFe]‐hydrogenases (Table 1) and it is close to the order of magnitude of other native [FeFe]‐hydrogenases from Clostridia.44, 45, 46

Table 1.

Comparison of the Specific Activity and Yield of CaHydA with Other Recombinant [FeFe]‐Hydrogenases

Type Host Maturases Enzyme Specific activity (µmol H2/min/mg) Yield (mg/L) Ref.
Cell‐
Hosted
E. coli Rosetta2(DE3) Ca CaHydA 1880 ± 108 GC 10 mM MV pH 8.0 1.2 This work
E. coli Rosetta2(DE3) Ca Fd‐CrHydA1 1000 GC 10 mM MV pH 8.0 5 [10]
E. coli BL21(DE3) ΔiscR So CrHydA1 641 ± 88 GC 5 mM MV pH 6.8 30 ± 11 [20]
S. oneidensis endog. CrHydA1 740 ± 56 Electrode 5 mM MV pH 6.7 0.5 [32]
C. acetobutylicum endog. CaHydA 1750* GC MV pH 6.8 0.8 [9]
endog. CrHydA1 625* GC MV pH 6.8 1
E. coli BL21(DE3) Ca CaHydA 75.2 GC 5 mM MV pH 7‐8 NR [8]
Ca CrHydA1 150 GC 5 mM MV pH 7‐8 0.8‐1.0
Cell‐ Free CpI 2037 ± 616 GC 10 mM MV pH 6.8 NR [38]
Ca CrHydA1 700 − 800 GC 10 mM MV pH 6.8 NR [37]
So CpI ∼700** Spect. MV NR [36]
Ca CsHydA ∼2.5 GC 10 mM MV pH 7.5 NR [33]

Ca, Clostridium acetobutylicum; Cr, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; So, Shewanella oneidensis; Cs, Clostridium saccharobutylicum; endog, endogenous maturases; Fd, ferredoxin. Without other specification, specific activity is reported as H2 evolution rate. *) V max. **) H2 oxidation rate. The methodology used is also indicated: GC, gas chromatography. Spect, spectrophotometric assay. MV, methyl viologen as artificial redox partner. The pH of the assay is also specified. Protein yield is reported as mg pure protein obtained per liter of culture. NR, not reported.

These results may be very useful in the future to standardise the process and to simplify comparison between different enzyme preparations from different laboratories. Also, the effect of the temperature on specific activity of purified enzymes can contribute to explain the apparent incongruences previously reported in recent mutagenesis studies.11, 12, 13, 14, 18

In conclusion, the results presented here show that the post‐induction temperature has a relevant effect on the pure protein yield of CaHydA [FeFe]‐hydrogenase and on the specific activity of a properly assembled H‐cluster in the purified enzyme, with reverse proportionality. The maximum specific activity was observed when the post‐induction temperature was 30°C. Despite the lower yield of pure protein, it is clear that the solubility and the higher specific activity, given by a higher proportion of holo‐enzyme, are important factors for the characterisation of [FeFe]‐hydrogenases and for their effective exploitation in future applications in biotechnology.

Materials and Methods

Recombinant expression

The plasmids pCaE2 and pCaFG encoding for CaHydA and the maturases CaHydE, CaHydF and CaHydG8 were cotransformed into E. coli Rosetta2(DE3). As previously described,10 bacteria were aerobically grown in baffled flasks (VWR) at 37°C in terrific broth (12 g/L tryptone, 24 g/L yeast extract, 4 mL/L glycerol, 2.2 g/L KH2PO4, 9.4 g/L K2HPO4) supplemented with 200 µg/mL carbenicillin, 50 µg/mL streptomycin, 34 µg/mL chloramphenicol and 2 mM ammonium ferric citrate. When the OD600 reached ∼0.4, the culture was supplemented with 2 mM cysteine, 25 mM fumarate, 0.5% w/v glucose and induced with 1.5 mM IPTG.

Immediately after induction, the culture was split in sterile glass vials (100 mL each), sealed and purged with pure argon to remove trace oxygen, allowing the expression of the active enzymes. The vials were then incubated 22 h at different temperatures ranging from 4°C to 37°C.

Protein expression analysis

Total cell lisates were separated by SDS‐PAGE on 10% polyacrylamide gels and stained with Coomassie R350 (GE Healthcare). Western blot against Strep‐TagII was performed on PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare) with the Strep‐Tactin HRP conjugate (IBA) and stained with 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (Sigma‐Aldrich).

Enzyme purification

All the manipulations were carried out under strict anaerobic conditions in a glove box (Plas Labs) under a hydrogen‐nitrogen atmosphere. All solutions were equilibrated with the glove box atmosphere and supplemented with 2 − 20 mM sodium dithionite before use.

CaHydA was purified by affinity chromatography by Strep‐Tactin Superflow high capacity cartridges (IBA, Goettingen, Germany) as previously described.18

Purified protein yield was determined with the Bradford assay using bovine serum albumin as standard (Sigma‐Aldrich).

Activity assays

Hydrogenase activity (H2 evolution) was determined at 37°C as previously described.18 Briefly, reactions were set up in anaerobic 100 mM TrisHCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 8.0 with 10 mM methyl viologen, and 20 mM sodium dithionite. For the determination of the whole cells activity 0.1% v/v Triton X‐100 was also added and the reaction was started by the addition of the culture. For the determination of the specific activity, the reactions were started by the addition of the purified enzyme.

H2 evolution was quantified by gas chromatography, using an Agilent Technologies 7890A instrument equipped with purged packed inlet, Molesieve 5A column (30 m, ID 0.53 mm, film 25 mm) and thermal conductivity detector; argon was used as carrier gas.

References

  • 1. Vignais PM, Billoud P (2007) Occurrence, classification, and biological function of hydrogenases: an overview. Chem Rev 107:4206–4272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Levin DB Pitt L, Love M (2004) Biohydrogen production: prospects and limitations to practical application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29:173–185. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hallenbeck PC (2009) Fermentative hydrogen production: Principles, progress, and prognosis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:7379–7389. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. McKinlay JB, Harwood CS (2010) Photobiological production of hydrogen gas as a biofuel. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21:244–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Morra S, Valetti F, Sadeghi SJ, King PW, Meyer T, Gilardi G (2011) Direct electrochemistry of an [FeFe]‐hydrogenase on a TiO2 Electrode. Chem Commun 47:10566–10568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Woolerton TW, Sheard S, Chaudhary YS, Armstrong FA (2012) Enzymes and bio‐inspired electrocatalysts in solar fuel devices. Energy Environ Sci 5:7470–7490. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. King PW (2013) Designing interfaces of hydrogenase–nanomaterial hybrids for efficient solar conversion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1827:949–957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. King PW, Posewitz MC, Ghirardi ML, Seibert M (2006) Functional studies of [FeFe] hydrogenase maturation in an Escherichia coli biosynthetic system. J Bacteriol 188:2163–2172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. von Abendroth G, Stripp S, Silakov A, Croux C, Soucaille P, Girbal L, Happe T (2008) Optimized overexpression of [FeFe] hydrogenases with high specific activity in Clostridium acetobutylicum . Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:6076–6081. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Yacoby I, Tegler LT, Pochekailov S, Zhang S, King PW (2012) Optimised expression and purification for high‐activity preparations of algal [FeFe]‐hydrogenase. PloS ONE 7:e35886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lautier T, Ezanno P, Baffert C, Fourmond V, Cournac L, Fontecilla‐Camps JC, Soucaille P, Bertrand P, Meynial‐Salles I, Léger C (2011) The quest for a functional substrate access tunnel in FeFe hydrogenase. Faraday Discuss 148:385–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Knörzer P, Silakov A, Foster CE, Armstrong FA, Lubitz W, Happe T (2012) Importance of the protein framework for catalytic activity of [FeFe]‐hydrogenases. J Biol Chem 286:38341–38347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Cornish J, Gärtner K, Yang H, Peters JW, Hegg WL (2011) Mechanism of proton transfer in [FeFe]‐hydrogenase from Clostridium pasteurianum . J Biol Chem 286:38341–38347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Mulder DW, Ratzloff MW, Bruschi M, Greco C, Koonce E, Peters JW, King PW (2014) Investigations on the role of proton‐coupled electron transfer in hydrogen activation by [FeFe]‐gydrogenase. J Am Chem Soc 136:15394–15402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Nagy LE, Meuser JE, Plummer S, Seibert M, Ghirardi ML, King PW, Ahmann D, Posewitz MC (2007) Application of gene‐shuffling for the rapid generation of novel [FeFe]‐hydrogenase libraries. Biotechnol Lett 29:421–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Stapleton JA, Swartz JR (2010) A cell‐free microtiter plate screen for improved [FeFe] hydrogenases. PLoS ONE 5:e10554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Stapleton JA, Swartz JR (2010) Development of an in vitro compartmentalization screen for high‐throughput directed evolution of [FeFe] hydrogenases. PLoS ONE 5:e15275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Morra S, Giraudo A, Di Nardo G, King PW, Gilardi G, Valetti F (2012) Site saturation mutagenesis demonstrates a central role for cysteine 298 as proton donor to the catalytic site in CaHydA [FeFe]‐hydrogenase. PLoS ONE 7:e48400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bingham S, Smith PR, Swartz JR (2012) Evolution of an [FeFe] hydrogenase with decreased oxygen sensitivity. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:2965–2976. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kuchenreuther JM, Grady‐Smith CS, Bingham AS, Gorge SJ, Cramer SP, Swartz JR (2010) High‐yield expression of heterologous [FeFe] hydrogenases in Escherichia coli . PloS ONE 5:e15491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mulder DW, Boyd ES, Sarma R, Lange RK, Endrizzi JA, Broderick JB, Peters JW (2010) Stepwise [FeFe]‐hydrogenase H‐cluster assembly revealed in the structure of HydAΔEFG. Nature 465:248–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mulder DW, Ratzloff MW, Shepard EM, Byer AS, Noone SM, Peters JW, Broderick JB, King PW (2013) EPR and FTIR analysis on the mechanism of H2 activation by [FeFe]‐hydrogenase HydA1 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii . J Am Chem Soc 135:6921–6929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Myers WK, Stich TA, Suess DLM, Kuchenreuther JM, Swartz JR, Britt RD (2014) The cyanide ligands of [FeFe] hydrogenase: Pulse EPR studies of 13C and 15N‐labeled H‐cluster. J Am Chem Soc 136:12237–12240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Adamska A, Silakov A, Lambertz C, Rüdiger O, Happe T, Reijerse E, Lubitz W (2012) Identification and characterization of the “super‐reduced” state of the H‐cluster in [FeFe] hydrogenase: a new building block for the catalytic cycle? Angew Chem Int Ed 51:11458–11462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kim S, Lu D, Park S, Wang G (2012) Production of hydrogenases as biocatalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:15833–15840. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Posewitz MC, King PW, Smolinski SL, Zhang Z, Seibert M, Ghirardi ML (2004) Discovery of two novel radical S‐adenosylmethionine proteins required for the assembly of an active [Fe] hydrogenase. J Biol Chem 279:25711–25720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kuchenreuther JM, George SJ, Grady‐Smith CS, Cramer SP, Swartz JR (2011) Cell‐free H‐cluster synthesis and [FeFe] hydrogenase activation: all five CO and CN ligands derive from tyrosine. PloS ONE 6:e20346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cendron L, Berto P, D'Adamo S, Vallese F, Covoni C, Posewitz MC, Giacometti GM, Costantini P, Zanotti G (2011) Crystal structure of HydF scaffold protein provides insights into [FeFe]‐hydrogenase maturation. J Biol Chem 286:43944–43950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Shepard EM, Mus F, Betz JN, Byer AS, Duffus BR, Peters JW, Broderick JB (2014) [FeFe]‐Hydrogenase maturation. Biochemistry 53:4090–4104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Yacoby I, Pochekailov S, Toporik H, Ghirardi M, King P, Zhang S (2011) Photosynthetic electron partitioning between [FeFe]‐hydrogenase and ferredoxin:NADP+‐oxidoreductase (FNR) enzymes in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:9396–9401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Girbal L, von Abendroth G, Winkler M, Benton PMC, Meynial‐Salles I, Croux C, Peters JW, Happe T, Soucaille P (2005) Homologous and heterologous overexpression in Clostridium acetobutylicum and characterization of purified clostridial and algal Fe‐only hydrogenases with high specific activities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2777–2781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sybirna K, Antoine T, Lindberg P, Fourmond V, Rousset M, Mèjean V, Bottin H (2008) Shewanella oneidensis: a new and efficient system for expression and maturation of heterologous [Fe‐Fe] hydrogenase from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii . BMC Biotechnol 8:73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. McGlynn SE, Ruebush SS, Naumov A, Nagy LE, Dubini A, King PW, Broderick JB, Posewitz MC, Peters JW (2007) In vitro activation of [FeFe] hydrogenase: new insights into hydrogenase maturation. J Biol Inorg Chem 12:443–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Boyer ME, Stapleton JA, Kuchenreuther JM, Wang CW, Swartz JR (2008) Cell‐free synthesis and maturation of [FeFe] hydrogenases. Biotechnol Bioeng 99:59–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kuchenreuther JM, Stapleton JA, Swartz JR (2009) Tyrosine, cysteine and S‐Adenosyl methionine stimulate in vitro [FeFe] hydrogenase activation. PloS ONE 4:e7565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kuchenreuther JM, Britt RD, Swartz JR (2012) New insights into [FeFe] hydrogenase activation and maturase function. PloS ONE 7:e45850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Berggren G, Adamska A, Lambertz C, Simmons TR, Esselborn J, Atta M, Gambarelli S, Mouesca JM, Reijerse E, Lubitz W, Happe T, Artero V, Fontecave M (2013) Biomimetic assembly and activation of [FeFe]‐hydrogenases. Nature 499:66–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Esselborn J, Lambertz C, Adamska‐Venkatesh A, Simmons T, Berggren G, Noth J, Siebel J, Hemschemeier A, Artero V, Reijerse E, Fontecave M, Lubitz W, Happe T (2013) Spontaneous activation of [FeFe]‐hydrogenases by an inorganic [2Fe] active site mimic. Nat Chem Biol 9:607–609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Sørensen HP, Mortensen KK (2005) Soluble expression of recombinant proteins in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli . Microb Cell Fact 4:1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Tolia NH, Joshua‐Tor L (2006) Soluble expression of recombinant proteins in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli . Nat Methods 3:55–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Bandyopadhyay S, Chandramouli K, Johnson MK (2010) Iron‐sulphur cluster biosynthesis. Biochem Soc Trans 36:1112–1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Roche B, Aussel L, Ezraty B, Mandin P, Py B, Barras F (2013) Iron/sulfur proteins biogenesis in prokaryotes: Formation, regulation and diversity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1827:455–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Markley JL, Kim JH, Dai Z, Bothe JR, Cai K, Frederick RO, Tonelli M (2013) Metamorphic protein IscU alternates conformations in the course of its role as the scaffold protein for iron–sulfur cluster biosynthesis and delivery. FEBS Lett 587:1172–1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chen JS, Mortenson LE (1974) Purification and properties of hydrogenase from Clostridium pasteurianum W5. Biochim Biophys Acta 371:283–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Adams MWW (1990) The structure and mechanism of iron‐hydrogenases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1020:115–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Peters JW, Lanzilotta WN, Lemon BJ, Seefeldt LC (1998) X‐ray crystal structure of the Fe‐only hydrogenase (CpI) from Clostridium pasteurianum to 1.8 Angstrom resolution. Science 282:1853–1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES