Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology logoLink to Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology
. 2014 Mar 12;40(1):75–80. doi: 10.1007/s12639-014-0449-z

The anti-giardial effectiveness of fungal and commercial chitosan against Giardia intestinalis cysts in vitro

Mohammad Yarahmadi 1, Mahdi Fakhar 2, Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh 3, Aroona Chabra 4,✉, Bahman Rahimi-esboei 5
PMCID: PMC4815863  PMID: 27065602

Abstract

Chitosan with poly-N-acetylglucosamine sequences is a deacetylated derivative of chitin that can be found in the exoskeletons of crabs, shrimp and lobsters, the cuticles of insects and the cell walls of fungi. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of fungal chitosan (FC) prepared from the cell walls of Penicillium viridicatum and Penicillium aurantiogriseum with commercially available chitosan (CC) against Giardia intestinalis cysts in vitro. The giardia cysts were isolated using a sucrose method. Four concentrations (50, 100, 200 and 400 μg/ml) of each type of prepared chitosan were applied for 10, 30, 60 and 180 min. The viability of the cysts was checked via 0.1 % eosin staining. Our results indicate that P. viridicatum (with a 47.5 % DD) and P. aurantiogriseum (with a 47.3 % DD) at different concentrations after 180 min precipitated, respectively, 56, 69, 81 and 100 %, and 63, 75, 86 and 100 % mortality rates. CC (with a 54 % DD) showed 79, 84, 93 and 100 % mortality rates. In conclusion, both FC and CC at 400 μg/ml concentrations after 180 min of exposure showed the most potent effect against G. intestinalis cysts. Accordingly, chitosan could be suggested as a new natural nanoform agent for future research in the safe and effective treatment of Giardia infections.

Keywords: Giardia intestinalis, Giardiasis, Chitosan, Fungi, Penicillium spp.

Introduction

Parasitic infections are the primary causes of gastrointestinal syndromes in developing countries. Among the parasitic gastrointestinal infections, Giardia intestinalis is the most common (Faubert 2000). Giardia intestinalis is a flagellate protozoan that has a simple life cycle that is composed of two stages: the trophozoite stage and the cyst stage (infective form). The cyst is essential for the survival of the parasite outside of the host; new infections occur through the transmission of the cyst from host to host through fecal contamination (Svard et al. 2003; Adam 2001; Craun 1996; Guy et al. 2004). The clinical manifestations of this parasite are divided into asymptomatic giardiasis (carriers) or symptomatic giardiasis syndrome (diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, malabsorbtion and chronic giardiasis (a smaller number of cases, also resistant to treatment)) (Hill 2005; Ford 2005). Current chemical drugs, such as metronidazole, tinidazole and furazolidon, are frequently prescribed by clinicians for the treatment of giardiasis. These drugs have several side effects and a limited utility due to drug resistance; thus, it is necessary to pursue natural and safe drugs that have strong therapeutic effects, low costs and minimal side effects (Wright et al. 2003). Chitosan is a partially or fully deacetylated chitin (Fig. 1) that exists in crustacean shells, insect cuticles and fungi cell walls. Chitosan has extensive applications in agriculture, food, biotechnology, cosmeticology and pharmaceutical industries. It has a very safe toxicity profile and is a promising excipient for the pharmaceutical industry (Qi et al. 2004).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Structures of chitin and chitosan

Due to its potential widespread availability, chitosan from fungal cell walls could significantly decrease the cost of medication. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on fungal chitosan (FC) in use against Giardia cysts. In this investigation, we determined the effect of chitosan isolated from the cell wall of Penicillium viridicatum and Penicillium aurantiogriseum on the viability of Giardia cysts.

Materials and methods

Collection of G. intestinalis cysts

G. lamblia cysts were isolated from the stool samples of giardiasis patients. All samples were administered directly after arrival. A highly purified cyst suspension was achieved by combining the sucrose flotation method with a simplified sucrose gradient method (Sheffield and Bjorvatn 1977). The stools were broken up in normal saline and filtered through a 300 urn filter. A total of 3 ml of the stool suspension was layered on top of 3 ml of 0.85 M sucrose and centrifuged at 600×g for 10 min at 4 °C. The cysts were aspirated with a Pasteur pipette at the sucrose-water interface and washed 3 times with normal saline. The washed cysts were carefully added to the top of a discontinuous density gradient consisting of two 3-ml lavers of 0.85 M and 0.4 M sucrose. After centrifugation, the cysts concentrated at the 0.85–0.4 M sucrose interface were collected and washed again. The purified cysts were suspended in normal saline and stored at 4 °C for a maximum of 3 days prior to use.

Detection of the FC and CC antigiardial activities

The chitosan extracted from two Penicillium species (P. viridicatum and P. aurantiogriseum) in our previous study (Ebrahimzadeh et al. 2013) was prepared in four concentrations (50, 100, 200 and 400 μg/ml). For each concentration, incubation times of 10, 30, 60 and 180 min, respectively, were tested. A total of 2 ml of each solution was placed in test tubes, to which 10,000 washed cysts were added. The contents of the tubes were gently mixed. The tubes were then incubated at 37 °C for 10, 30, 60 and 180 min. At the end of each incubation period, the upper phase was carefully removed. A total of 2 ml of 0.1 % eosin stain was then added to the remaining settled cysts, which were then gently mixed. The cysts were then smeared on a glass slide, covered with a cover glass and examined under a light microscope. The percentages of the dead cysts were determined by counting 1,000 cysts per slide. Untreated cysts were used as a control group in each experiment. The tests were performed in triplicate.

Viability test

Eosin 0.1 % stain was used to determine the viability of the cysts. Fifteen minutes after exposure to the stain, the cysts with no absorbed dye were recorded as being potentially viable; otherwise, the cysts were recorded as dead.

Statistical analysis

The results were performed using SPSS software version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Differences between the untreated and treated samples were tested for significance using a T test (a P value <0.05 was considered significant).

Results

The antiprotozoal activity of the isolated chitosan from P. aurantiogriseum, P.viridicatum and commercially available chitosan are shown in Tables 1, 2 and 3. Our data indicate a significant difference between the untreated group and the group treated with chitosan for certain durations (30, 60 and 180 min) (P < 0.05). Time as an effective parameter influenced the mortality rate of G. intestinalis cysts; increasing the duration of contact also increased the mortality rate (P < 0.05). The difference between the groups treated with FC and the group treated with commercial chitosan was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the treated and untreated groups at 10 min of exposure (P > 0.05). A high mortality rate was observed at all concentrations after 180 min of contact. The mortality rate of the cysts treated with commercial chitosan, P.viridicatum or P. aurantiogriseum after 180 min of exposure at a concentration of 50 μ/ml was 56, 65 and 79 %, at 100 μ/ml was 69, 75 and 84 %, at 200 μ/ml was 81, 86 and 93 % and at 400 μ/ml was 100, 100 and 100 %, respectively. The mortality rate of the control group at 10, 30, 60 and 180 min was 6, 7, 7 and 9 %, respectively. As shown in Table 1, the commercial chitosan with a 54 % deacetylation rate shows the highest antigiardial action at all concentrations with a mortality rate of 79–100 % after 180 min. As shown in Fig. 2, when the rate of the deacetylation of CC was 54 %, the antigiardial activity of chitosan was at its highest point, while the P. viridicatum and P. aurantiogriseum (with 47.5 and 47.3 % DD) chitosan showed a weakened effect compared with the commercial chitosan. However, this difference was not significant.

Table 1.

The mortality rate of G. intestinalis cysts in the presence of different concentrations of commercially available chitosan and given different exposure times

Exposure time/concentration 50 μg/ml 100 μg/ml 200 μg/ml 400 μg/ml P value Control group
10 min 7 9 13 19 0.155 7
30 min 29 31 47 53 0.011 9
60 min 57 63 69 76 0.001 9
180 min 79 84 93 100 0.0001 8
P value 0.081 0.056 0.027 0.013 – –
Open in a new tab

Table 2.

The mortality rate of G. intestinalis cysts in the presence of different concentrations of P. Viridicatum chitosan and given different exposure times

Exposure time/concentration 50 μg/ml 100 μg/ml 200 μg/ml 400 μg/ml P value Control group
10 min 6 9 15 19 0.175 7
30 min 23 29 39 49 0.016 9
60 min 38 49 61 69 0.005 9
180 min 56 69 81 100 0.006 8
P value 0.108 0.053 0.02 0.012 – –
Open in a new tab

Table 3.

The mortality rate of G. intestinalis cysts in the presence of different concentrations of P. aurantiogriseum chitosan and given different exposure times

Exposure time/concentration 50 μg/ml 100 μg/ml 200 μg/ml 400 μg/ml P value Control group
10 min 6 7 16 21 0.223 7
30 min 13 19 37 41 0.057 9
60 min 43 50 62 69 0.004 9
180 min 63 75 86 100 0.003 8
P value 0.155 0.101 0.018 0.012 – –
Open in a new tab

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Effect of the degree of deacetylation (DD) on the mortality rate of Giardia intestinalis cysts

Discussion

The present study demonstrated the chitosan prepared from two fungal species and its antigiardial activity against G. intestinalis cysts in vitro. Giardiasis is an important health issue that has a worldwide distribution and is particularly present in Iran. At present, chemotherapy remains a common treatment for giardiasis. However, resistance to chemotherapy is the primary problem in giardiasis treatment. Therefore, there is a pressing need for a low-cost drug with rapid and efficacious antigiardial action that has no toxicity or side effects (Kumar et al. 2007). FC appears to be an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of resistant infections. Several experiments demonstrated the use of herbal extracts as antigiardial agents. Rahimi-Esboei et al. (2012) reported that 100 mg/ml of hydroalcoholic extract of Artemisia annua had the highest cytotoxicity effect against G. intestinalis cysts after 24 h in vitro. In another study, they established that a concentration of 100 mg/ml of Sambucus ebulus had the highest antigiardial activity after 60 min (78 ± 4 %) (Rahimi-Esboei et al. 2013a, b). Said et al. (2012) investigated the antiparasitic potential of chitosan isolated from the larvae of Musca domestica against G. intestinalis cysts in vivo. They also reported that the antiparasitic activity of curcumin (a natural polyphenolic compound extracted from turmeric root) is not acceptable. Finally, they suggested that a combination therapy using the nanoforms of chitosan, silver and curcumin led to complete (100 %) trophozoite eradication. A number of synthetic and natural components have been noted for their intrinsic antigiardial action. However, many complications may occur due to their toxicities and carcinogenicities (Clark 1996). Chitosan (given its non-toxic, non-carcinogenic, non-allergen profiles) could be used in several applications such as anticoagulation, wound healing, microbiology, drug delivery, oral vaccine carrier, film coating, mouthwash, food and nutrition, agriculture, cosmetics, etc. Many in vivo and in vitro studies have confirmed the non-toxicity of chitosan to normal human cell lines, and the FDA has approved chitosan for clinical applications (Ariani et al. 2009). Chitosan is a well-known biopolymer that is widely used as an antimicrobial agent in pharmaceutical industries. Previous literature has focused on the antibacterial activity of chitosan from shrimp, crabs and fungi, and little information is available on the antiparasitic potential of FC. Tayel et al. (2011) investigated the antibacterial and antifungal activity of the derivatives of isolated chitosan from the biomass of Aspergillus niger. They considered chitosan-treated fabrics to be appropriate for medical use. Martinez et al. (2010) demonstrated the potential of isolated chitosan from crustacean exoskeletons for killing the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans, which causes infections by forming a biofilm on indwelling medical devices. They also established that the chitosan concentration needed for the treatment of fungal biofilms shows no toxicity to human cells. In our previous investigations, we revealed that the FC prepared from Penicillium waksmanii, Penicillium citrinum, P. viridicatum and P. aurantiogriseum at concentrations of 400 μg/ml killed all Echinococcus granulosus cysts after 180 min (Fakhar et al. 2013; Rahimi-Esboei et al. 2013a, b). Many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of chitosan at different concentrations and exposure times for reducing the viability of different families of bacteria (Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi, Salmonella paratyphi-A, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Lactobacillusplantarum, Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, etc.) (No et al. 2002; Tin et al. 2009), fungi (A. niger, Alternaria alternata, Alternaria solani, Phomopsis asparagi, Rhizopus stolonifer, Rhizopus oryzae, Phytophthora capsici, Phytophthora parasítica, Verticillium dahlia, Colletotrichum orbiculare, Exserohilum turcicum, Pyricularia oryzae, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium sulphureum, Fusarium solani, Candida albicans, Neurospora crassa, Penicillium expansum, Penicillum digitatum, etc.) (Reddy et al. 1998; Guerra-S′anchez et al. 2009; Zhong et al. 2007; Ziani et al. 2009; Falcón et al. 2008; Kong et al. 2010; Yong-cai et al. 2009; Lafontaine and Benhamou 1996; Lauzardo 2009; Rane and Hoover 1993; Ting et al. 2007; Xu et al. 2007; Palma-Guerrero et al. 2009; Pacheco et al. 2008) and parasites (Trichomonas gallinae, E. granulosus, Cryptosporidium parvum, Philasterides dicentrarchi, etc.) (Tavassoli et al. 2012; Fakhar et al. 2013; Brown and Emelko 2008; Parama et al. 2005).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the capability of chitosan prepared from P. viridicatum and P.aurantiogriseum isolated from agricultural soils in Iran to inactivate G. intestinalis cysts. The maximal action was observed with a 400 μg/ml concentration after 180 min (100 % reduction in cyst viability). Commercially available chitosan was more effective than FC against G. intestinalis cysts. The viability of G. intestinalis cysts decreased by increasing the chitosan concentration and exposure time. The use of the degree of deacetylation (DD) as a main parameter could reduce the exposure time. Further experiments are required to evaluate other natural products, particularly in their nanoform, as alternative therapies against giardia infections.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks the American Experts Journal scientists for their appropriate English language editing. This study was supported by a Grant from the Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

References

  1. Adam D. Biology of Giardia lamblia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14:447–475. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.3.447-475.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ariani MD, Yuliati A, Adiarto T. Toxicity testing of chitosan from tiger prawn shell waste on cell culture. Dent J. 2009;42(1):16. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown TJ, Emelko MB. Chitosan and metal salt coagulant impacts on Cryptosporidium and microsphere removal by filtration. Water Res. 2008;43(2):331–338. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark AM. Natural products as a resource for new drugs. Pharm Res. 1996;13(8):1133–1144. doi: 10.1023/A:1016091631721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Craun GF. Wasterborne outbreaks of giardiasis: current status. In: Erlandsen SL, Meyer EA, editors. Giardia and giardiasis: biology, pathogenesis, and epidemiology. New York: Plenum Press; 1996. pp. 243–261. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ebrahimzadeh MA, Chabra A, Gharaei-Fathabad E, Pourmorad F. Preparation of chitosan from Penicillium spp. and determination of their degree of deacetylation. Indian J Biotech. 2013;12:231–235. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fakhar M, Chabra A, Rahimi-Esboei B, Rezaei F. In vitro protoscolicidal effects of fungal chitosan isolated from Penicillium waksmanii and Penicillium citrinum. J Parasit Dis. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0300-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Falcón AB, Cabrera JC, Costales D, Ramírez MA, Cabrera G, et al. The effect of size and acetylation degree of chitosan derivatives on tobacco plant protection against Phytophthora parasitica nicotianae. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24(1):103–112. doi: 10.1007/s11274-007-9445-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Faubert G. Immune response to Giardia duodenalis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:35–54. doi: 10.1128/CMR.13.1.35-54.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ford BJ. The Discovery of Giardia. Microscope. 2005;53:147–153. [Google Scholar]
  11. Guerra-S′anchez M G, Vega-P′erez J, Vel′azquez-del VMG, Hern′andez (2009)
  12. Guy RA, Xiao C, Paul A, Horgen A. Real-time PCR assay for detection and genotype differentiation of Giardia lamblia in stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(1):3310–3317. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3317-3320.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hill DR. Giardia lamblia. Princ Pract Infect Dis. 2005;6:3198–3205. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ing LY, Mohamad Zin N, Sarwar A, Katas H. Antifungal activity of chitosan nanoparticles and correlation with their physical properties. Int J Biomater. 2012;2012:9. doi: 10.1155/2012/632698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kong M, Guang Chen X, Xing K, Park HJ. Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;144:51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kumar R, Mishra AK, Dubey NK, Tripathi YB. Evaluation of Chenopodium ambrosioides oil as a potential source of antifungal activity, antiaflatoxigenic and antioxidant activity. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;2:159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lafontaine PJ, Benhamou N. Chitosan treatment: an emerging strategy for enhancing resistance of greenhouse tomato plants to infection by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 1996;6:111–124. doi: 10.1080/09583159650039575. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lauzardo AN. Antifungal activity and release of compounds on Rhizopus stolonifer (Ehrenb.:Fr.) Vuill. by effect of chitosan with different molecular weights. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2009;93(1):18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2008.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Martinez LR, Mihu MR, Han G, Frases S, Cordero JB, et al. The use of chitosan to damage Cryptococcus neoformans biofilms. Biomaterials. 2010;31:669–679. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. No HK, Park NY, Lee SH, Meyers SP. Antibacterial activity of chitosans and chitosan oligomers with different molecular weights. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;74:65–72. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00717-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pacheco N, Larralde-Corona CP, Sepulveda J, Trombotto S, Domard A, et al. Evaluation of chitosans and Pichia guillermondii as growth inhibitors of Penicillium digitatum. Int J Biol Macromol. 2008;43(1):20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2007.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Palma-Guerrero J, Huang IC, Jansson HB, Salinas J, Lopez-Llorca LV, et al. Chitosan permeabilizes the plasma membrane and kills cells of Neurospora crassa in an energy dependent manner. Fungal Genet Biol. 2009;46:585–594. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Parama A, Luzardo A, Blanco-Méndez J, Sanmartín ML, Leiro J. In vitro efficacy of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked chitosan microspheres against the fish-pathogenic ciliate Philasterides dicentrarchi. Dis Aquat Organ. 2005;64:151–158. doi: 10.3354/dao064151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Qi LF, Xu ZR, Jiang X, Hu CH, Zou XF. Preparation and antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles. Carbohydr Res. 2004;16:2693–2697. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2004.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rahimi-Esboei B, Gholami SH, Azadbakht M, Ziaei H. Effect of hydroalcholic extract of Artemisia annua on cysts of Giardia lamblia in in vitro. J Mazand Univ Med Sci. 2012;22(90):72–80. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rahimi-Esboei B, Ebrahimzadeh MA, Gholami SH, Falah Omrani V. Anti-giardial activity of Sambucus ebulus. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17:2047–2050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rahimi-Esboei B, Fakhar M, Chabra A, Hosseini M. In vitro treatments of Echinococcus granulosus with fungal chitosan, as a novel biomolecule. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013;3(10):930–934. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60160-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rane KD, Hoover DG. An evaluation of alkali and acid treatments for chitosan extraction from fungi. Process Biochem. 1993;28:115–118. doi: 10.1016/0032-9592(93)80016-A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Reddy MVB, Arul J, Ait-Barka E, Angers P, Richard C, et al. Effect of chitosan on growth and toxin production by Alternaria alternate f.sp. lycopersici. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 1998;8:33–43. doi: 10.1080/09583159830414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Said DE, ElSamad LM, Gohar YM. Validity of silver, chitosan, and curcumin nanoparticles as anti-Giardia agents. Parasitol Res. 2012;111(5):545–554. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-2866-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sheffield HG, Bjorvatn B. Ultrastructure of the cyst of Giardia lamblia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1977;26:23–30. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1977.26.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Svard SG, Hagblom P, Palm JE. Giardia lambia- a model organism for eukaryotic cell differentiation. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;281(1):3–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2003.tb11490.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tavassoli M, Imani A, Tajik H, Moradi M, Pourseyed SH. Novel in vitro efficiency of chitosan biomolecule against Trichomonas gallinae. Iran J Parasitol. 2012;7:92–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tayel AA, Moussa SH, El-Tras WF, Elguindy NM, Opwis K. Antimicrobial textile treated with chitosan from Aspergillus niger mycelial waste. Int J Biol Macromol. 2011;49:241–245. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tin S, Sakharkar KR, Lim CS, Sakharkar MK. Activity of chitosans in combination with antibiotics in Pseudomonasaeruginosa. Int J Biol Sci. 2009;5(2):153–160. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ting Y, Hong YL, Xiao DZ. Synergistic effect of chitosan and Cryptococcus laurentii on inhibition of Penicillium expansum infections. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;114:261–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wright JM, Dunn LA, Upcroft P, Upcroft JA. Efficacy of antigiardial drugs. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2003;2(6):529–541. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2.6.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xu J, Zhao X, Han X, Du Y. Antifungal activity of oligochitosan against Phytophthora capsici and other plant pathogenic fungi in vitro. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2007;87:220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2006.07.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yong-cai LI, Xiao-juan SUN, Yang BI, Yong-hong GE, Yi W. Antifungal activity of chitosan on Fusarium sulphureum in relation to dry rot of potato tuber. Agric Sci China. 2009;8:597–604. doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60251-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhong Z, Chen R, Xing R, Chen X, Liu S, et al. Synthesis and antifungal properties of sulfanilamide derivatives of chitosan. Carbohydr Res. 2007;342(16):2390–2395. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2007.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ziani K, Fern′andez-Pan I, Royo M, Mate JI. Antifungal activity of films and solutions based on chitosan against typical seed fungi. Food Hydrocoll. 2009;23(8):2309–2314. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES