Abstract
A mixture-based combinatorial library of five Ugi adducts (4–8) incorporating known antitubercular and antimalarial pharmacophores was successfully synthesized, starting from the naturally occurring diisocyanide 3, via parallel Ugi four-center three-component reactions (U-4C-3CR). The novel α-acylamino amides obtained were evaluated for their antiinfective potential against laboratory strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and chloroquine-susceptible 3D7 Plasmodium falciparum. Interestingly, compounds 4–8 displayed potent in vitro antiparasitic activity with higher cytotoxicity in comparison to their diisocyanide precursor 3, with the best compound exhibiting an IC50 value of 3.6 nM. Additionally, these natural product inspired hybrids potently inhibited in vitro thromboxane B2 (TXB2) and superoxide anion (O2−) generation from Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated rat neonatal microglia, with concomitant low short-term toxicity.
Keywords: Tuberculosis, Malaria, Anti-neuroinflammatory activity, Ugi multicomponent reaction, Isocyanide, Natural product hybridization
During the course of our investigations of new biologically active compounds from Caribbean marine invertebrates, we have focused our attention to discover new drugs for the treatment of tropical diseases (TDs), which affect billions of people worldwide.1 Tuberculosis and malaria are two of the major TDs with the highest rates of death.2 Current first-line drugs for the treatment of these diseases include isoniazid (1) and chloroquine (2), respectively. Owing to the emergence of microbes that are resistant to currently available antiinfective drugs, there exist an urgent need for new, effective and affordable backup drugs.3 As part of our strategy to the discovery of novel drugs to combat TDs, we have paid particular attention to determine the antiinfective action of marine isocyanides, since it was previously established that a number of secondary metabolites belonging to this class of compounds possess putative antitubercular and antiplasmodial activity.4 Moreover, recent investigations appear to support the hypothesis that marine isocyanides and derivatives could become lead compounds for the development of novel agents to modulate excessive release of TXB2 by activated microglia cells in neuroinflammatory disorders.5
While a number of amphilectane-based diterpene isocyanides with interesting bioactivity profiles have been reported, effective methods for their synthesis or for generating analogues are limited.6 This is not only due to the lack of compound supply, but equally important, the limited availability of general methods based on mild reaction conditions required for further functional group manipulations. For instance, the synthesis of complex natural products like 8,15-diisocyano-11(20)-amphilectene [(–)-DINCA] (3)7 and analogues required for structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies, poses a difficult challenge, often involving rather lengthy syntheses with introduction of the isocyanide functionality late in the synthesis.8 An alternative approach to drug discovery, which we have explored previously, is to use an abundant natural product as a scaffold or building block and to convert it into a small focused library of analogues.9 Our intended target was 3, which is accessible in milligram amounts and contains both the amphilectane framework and two isocyanide moieties, one of which could serve as a “handle” with potential for further synthetic elaboration. A mounting body of evidence, which suggest that both the isocyanide functional groups and the diterpene skeleton are responsible for the antituberculosis and antiplasmodial activity of (–)-DINCA (3), provides further support for this approach.10
An ideal tool for accessing a small library of isocyanide analogues of increased structural diversity, both quickly and in a synthetically inexpensive way, is the use of isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions (IMCRs).11 Over the past two decades the field of IMCR research has experienced a steadfast growth with the discovery and development of new variations of the classical Passerini and Ugi IMCRs.12 Multicomponent reactions are defined as reactions in which more than two starting compounds react to form a product that incorporates essentially all of the carbon atoms. In particular, the multicomponent isocyanide condensation discovered by Ivar Ugi is a versatile four-component reaction involving a carboxylic acid, an aldehyde, a primary or secondary amine, and an isocyanide.12 Thus, the Ugi isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions (Ugi IMCRs) are a powerful tool with which libraries of new compounds that are potentially effective against infectious diseases can be constructed in a single-stage reaction. Furthermore, Ugi IMCRs are typically easy to perform, tolerate a wide range of group functionalities, and provide quick access to structurally complex compounds that otherwise would require lengthy syntheses.13 An example of this approach to drug discovery using the Ugi IMCR is outlined below (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.
Coupling of the four components utilized in the U-4CC reactions.
In our ongoing investigations to discover novel compounds for screening against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the most common and deadly human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum (malaria tropica), we initially sought to design Ugi four-component condensation (U-4CC) reaction adducts (α-acylamino amides) that incorporate known pharmacophores found in two existing antitubercular and antimalarial drugs, namely, isoniazid (1) and chloroquine (2).14 Combining these pharmacophores through the U-4CC method has many attractive features, including the opportunity to rationally design novel drugs aimed at multiple targets within the tuberculosis bacterium and malaria parasite. These substructures would be incorporated as part of our amine or carboxylic acid component of the U-4CC reactions (Table 1).15 Our selection of formaldehyde as the aldehyde component was driven by our desire to synthesize low-molecular-weight adducts while avoiding the formation of epimeric mixtures at C-23, thus simplifying the purification process. Our choice for the isocyanide component was limited to (–)-DINCA (3) because of its remarkable potency against M. tuberculosis and chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum strains and preponderance to react preferentially through its C-15 isocyanide group.5,10 We expected that our natural product inspired molecular hybridization approach would lead us to the expeditious development of new hybrid molecules with noteworthy antiinfective properties. Table 1 summarizes our selection of carboxylic acid, amine, and aldehyde building blocks for the Ugi multicomponent-based library.
Table 1.
Building blocks for the Ugi multicomponent based library and isolated yields
| Product | Carboxylic acid (r1) | Amine (r2) | Aldehyde (r3) | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 |
|
|
|
61 |
| 5 |
|
|
|
53 |
| 6 |
|
|
|
71 |
| 7 |
|
|
|
67 |
| 8 |
|
NH3 |
|
42 |
To synthesize the quinoline-containing amine required for the U-4CC, we reacted commercially available 4,7-dichloroquinoline (9) with excess ethylenediamine in the absence of solvents at 80 °C for 1 h and at 135–140 °C for 3 h to afford 10 in 90% yield (Scheme 2).13a The condensation of stoichiometric amounts of the amine, aldehyde, carboxylic acid and diisocyanide 3 in anhydrous EtOH at 20 °C furnished the desired Ugi adducts. A summary of the synthesized target compounds 4–8 is provided in Figure 1. Following solvent removal under reduced pressure, purification of the crude reaction mixtures was easy achieved by flash silica-gel chromatography to afford the products in modest to good isolated yields (Table 1).
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of quinoline-containing amine 10.
Fig. 1.
Structural formulas of congeners 4–8 synthesized by U-4CC reactions with (–)-DINCA (3).
Compounds 4–8 were structurally analyzed on the basis of conventional spectroscopic data (IR, UV, HRESI-MS, and 1D and 2D NMR). For adducts 4 and 8, molecular characterization was swift and straightforward because each compound was obtained as a homogeneous stable entity. In the case of compounds 6 and 7, the initial characterization by 1H and 13C NMR was complicated because of the duplication of many of the proton and carbon signals. Rotation around the tertiary amide bond in these Ugi adducts gave rise to two quickly interchanging rotational isomers with notably different chemical shift values in a ratio of approximately 1:1. We confirmed this phenomenon by running the experiments in DMSO-d6 and briefly observed the coalescence of the duplicating peaks. The two sets of signals reappeared shortly thereafter (~2 h), indicating that the two rotamers had reached equilibrium. Rotational isomerization was observed only in the two latter adducts, which is reasonable given the inherent conformational flexibility introduced by the ethylenediamine bridge of 6 and 7 relative to that of 4, 5, and 8. As we predicted, the Ugi adduct 5 was obtained as a diastereomeric mixture (dr 67:33) that could not be easily separated by flash silica-gel chromatography and was therefore characterized as such without further optimization (the isomer ratio was determined via the integration of selected signals in the 1H NMR spectra of the reaction products).
Compounds 3–8 were tested against M. tuberculosis H37Rv with the results as shown in Table 2. From the modest library, compound 3 with an MIC of 3.2 μg/mL exhibited the best activity, being nearly as potent in this strain as the powerful mycobactericide isoniazid (1) (MIC = 0.44 μg/mL). On the other hand, the MIC values for the Ugi adducts obtained from 3, compounds 4–8, were between 14.9 and 101.8 μg/mL. Based on a comparison of the MIC results obtained for these compounds, it appears that manipulation of the isocyanide group at the C-15 position in 3 to an α-acylamino amide function, as in 4–8, results in a marked decrease in activity. In general, it can be seen from the Table 3 that the antitubercular activity decreases for all of the Ugi adducts whether based on isonicotinic acid (e.g. 4, 5, 7, and 8) or aminoquinoline (e.g. 6) pharmacophores.
Table 2.
In vitro antimycobacterial and antiplasmodial activities of compounds 3–8
| Compound | MABA MIC (μg/mL)a | 3D7 IC50 ± SE (nM)b | Cytotoxicity IC50 (nM) | Selectivity Indexc (SI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3.2 | 1.2 ± 0.00004 | 99735 | 83112 |
| 4 | 14.9 | 11.5 ± 0.0027 | 19788 | 1721 |
| 5 d | 56.4 | 13.0 ± 0.0034 | 49173 | 3782 |
| 6 | 17.9 | 11.1 ± 0.0006 | 28560 | 2573 |
| 7 | 52.0 | 3.6 ± 0.0003 | 25753 | 7154 |
| 8 | 101.8 | 6.3 ± 0.0005 | NT | – |
| CQ | – | 6.6 ± 0.0008 | 234470e | 35526 |
| INH | 0.44 | – | – | – |
Values are means of three experiments. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in μg/mL.
The IC50 values are reported as means ± standard errors.
Selectivity index (SI) defined by the ratio: IC50 (in mammalian Vero cell lines)/IC50 values of antiparasitic activity against 3D7 cell line.
Tested as a mixture of diastereomers.
Value obtained from reference 16. NT indicates that the compound was not tested due to insufficient material. CQ = chloroquine and INH = isoniazid (+Ctrls).
Table 3.
Antineuroinflammatory activity of compounds 3–8a
| Compound | O2– IC50 [μM] | TXB2 IC50 [μM] | LDH50b [μM] |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | > 10 | 0.23 | > 10 |
| 4 | > 10 | 3.0 | > 10 |
| 5 c | > 10 | 0.1 | > 10 |
| 6 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| 7 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 5.0 |
| 8 | > 10 | 1.1 | > 10 |
Effect of compounds 3–8 on LPS-primed rat microglia PMA [1 μM]-stimulated release of TBX2 [control release: 2,555 ± 718 pg/mL/70 min] and O2– [control release: 12.6 ± 2.4 nanomoles/70 min] and LDH. The antineuroinflammatory assay is described in the Supplementary data. Data correspond to 1–4 independent experiments.
LDH50 represents the concentration of the compound that caused 50% release of the total LDH content of microglia cells. LDH was measured as described in the Supplementary data.
Tested as a mixture of diastereomers.
As derivatives based on an antiparasitic natural product scaffold, compounds 4–8 were also screened against a chloroquine (CQ) non-resistant Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 strain to ascertain their potentials as effective antimalarial agents. The antiplasmodial activities were determined as the inhibitory concentrations at 50% parasite survival (IC50) in the strain; the results are tabulated in Table 2. The antiplasmodial activity and selectivity index (SI) of CQ (2) are also shown for comparative purposes. Interestingly, all of the α-acylamino amides obtained from the U-4CC reactions displayed potent antiplasmodial activity (IC50 values ≤ 13.0 nM) against this strain. Compound 7, which was based on isonicotinic acid and aminoquinoline pharmacophores, was observed to be the most active (IC50 = 3.6 nM) of the investigated compounds, although 8, which was based only on isonicotinic acid, was nearly as active (IC50 = 6.3 nM) as 7. Compound 5, the only adduct with a bulky group at C-23 that was analyzed to be a mixture of diastereomers, was the least active against the 3D7 strain (IC50 = 13.0 nM). However, we speculate that the separation and testing of each diastereomer may result in a marked increase in activity of one of the compounds. Inasmuch as hybrids 4–8 showed excellent in vitro inhibitory activity (IC50 values in the range of 3.6–13.0 nM) when compared to the standard drug CQ (IC50 = 6.6 nM), they showed more toxicity (SI values in the range 19788–49173) than the CQ (SI = 35526). Interestingly, our starting scaffold 3 proved to be the most promising compound of the series (IC50 = 1.2 nM, SI = 83112), which was 5.5 times more active and significantly less toxic than the standard drug. When compared to 3, the observation that the antiplasmodial activity of the new compounds is comparable to that of the parent compound raises the question as to whether the isocyanide group at C-15 in the natural product is responsible for the observed activity.
Derivatives 4–8 along with scaffold 3 were screened further in order to determine the effect of these compounds on E. coli LPS-activated microglia TXB2 and O2− generation in vitro. O2− and TXB2 release, as well as short term cell viability, were assessed as described in the Supplementary data. As shown in Table 3, α-acylamino amides 4, 5 and 8 (based on the isonicotinic acid pharmacophore only) inhibited TXB2 generation with IC50’s = 3.0, 0.1 and 1.1 μM, respectively, demonstrating minimal effect on O2− release (IC50 > 10 μM) and minimal short-term toxicity (LDH50 > 10 μM). In contrast, 6 and 7, the only derivatives prepared based on the aminoquinoline pharmacophore, potently inhibited TXB2 generation (IC50 = 0.8 and 0.9 μM, respectively) and O2− release (IC50 = 1.7 and 5.0 μM, respectively), but with evidence of short-term toxicity (LDH50 = 5.0 μM). Thus, in our in vitro experimental conditions, it appeared that inhibition of microglia TXB2 generation by Ugi adducts 4, 5 and 8 resulted from a pharmacologic effect, in contrast with that of analogs 6 and 7 that were toxic to the microglia cells. To summarize, comparison of the IC50's of starting diisocyanide 3 (IC50 ~ 0.23 μM) and α-acylamino amides 4–8 supports the observation that the observed bioactivity is mainly associated with the presence of an amphilectane diterpenoid core bearing a C-8 isocyanide functionality. Within the series of semi-synthetic products 4–8, analog 5 displayed the highest antineuroinflammatory activity (IC50 = 0.1 μM), and when compared to 4, the least active congener bearing the isonicotinic acid pharmacophore (IC50 = 3.0 μM), the presence in 5 of a phenyl residue at C-23 seems to further potentiate its biological activity. On the other hand, substitution of R2 (Scheme 1) with bulkier functional groups, as observed in compound 7, appears to lower the activity. Moreover, comparison of the IC50's of 4 and 8 suggests that the presence of an isopentyl group (R2) also seems to play a role in lowering the observed pharmacological activity. Lack of O2− inhibition in compounds 3–5 and 8 would appear to suggest that they inhibit TXB2 synthesis through a cyclooxygenase-dependent mechanism.
To summarize, Ugi IMCRs were used to accomplish four-component couplings of amines, aldehydes, acids, and diisocyanide 3, allowing for the design and construction of a small library of α-acetylamino amides (4–8) that, while less active than isoniazid (1), are as potent as the antimalarial drug chloroquine (2) against the 3D7 strain of P. falciparum. All of the compounds in our modest library exhibited IC50 values in the low nanomolar range, with adduct 7 exhibiting the highest antiplasmodial activity (IC50 = 3.6 nM, SI = 7154). To our delight, this hybrid was twice as potent as chloroquine against the 3D7 strain (Table 2), however, it showed the most toxicity. Although some general trends related to the activities of the compounds are evident, further exploration, including the synthesis and testing of additional compounds against multiple parasite strains with various degrees of sensitivity and resistance, will be needed before definite conclusions can be drawn. Notwithstanding, the results presented herein clearly underscore the importance of isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions in antimalarial drug discovery, particularly when combined with a rational choice of inputs based on known antimalarial pharmacophores. Thus, hybrid approaches inspired by natural products can lead to the rapid generation of novel chemotypes for the development of diverse, biologically rich SAR libraries.16 The development of new treatment strategies is of great importance because parasitic resistance to existing antimalarial agents is spreading rapidly. In time, this seemingly inevitable predicament will diminish the effectiveness of the artemisinins, the current mainstay of treatment against drug-resistant parasites.3 Finally, in addition to their pharmacologic effects on enhanced TXB2 generation and their reduced cytotoxic effects, it is perhaps of interest to note that derivatives 4–8 are more potent inhibitors of rat microglia TXB2 generation than acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) (IC50 = 3.12–10.0 μM)17,18 and flurbiprofen (apparent IC50 = 100 nM),19 which are two clinically used NSAIDS.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. J. Marrero for the initial characterization of (–)-DINCA (3) and L. Gómez for technical assistance during the Ugi reactions. Mass spectral determinations were provided by the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory of the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. Financial support to E. Avilés was provided by the PRLSAMP-BDP, UPR-RISE, GK-12, and Eli Lilly del Caribe Foundation fellowships. A.M.S.M. thanks the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at Midwestern University for a CCOM Student Summer Research Award to support K.C. and Mary L. Hall for expert technical assistance with the O2−, TXB2 and LDH assays. This research was supported by the NIH Grant 1SC1GM086271-01A1 awarded to A. D. Rodríguez.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental details for the synthesis, molecular structure characterization, and biological evaluation of new compounds) associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/.......
References and notes
- 1. http://www.who.int/
- 2.a Murray CJL, Ortblad KF, Guinovart C, Lim SS, Wolock TM, Roberts DA, Dansereau EA, Graetz N, Barber RM, Brown JC, Wang H, Duber HC, Naghavi M, Dicker D, Dandona L, Salomon JA, Heuton KR, Foreman K, Phillips DE, Fleming TD, Flaxman AD, Phillips BK, Johnson EK. Lancet. 2014;384:1005. [Google Scholar]; b Kappe SHI, Vaughan AM, Boddey JA, Cowman AF. Science. 2010;328:862. doi: 10.1126/science.1184785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Wells TNC, Alonso PL, Gutterifge WE. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2009;8:879. doi: 10.1038/nrd2972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.a Marris E. Nature. 2006;443:131. doi: 10.1038/443131b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Cohen J. Science. 2006;313:1554. doi: 10.1126/science.313.5793.1554a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Gelb MH. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2007;11:440. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.05.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.a Mayer AMS, Rodríguez AD, Taglialatela-Scafati O, Fusetani N. Mar. Drugs. 2013;11:2510. doi: 10.3390/md11072510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Fattorusso E, Taglialatela-Scafati O. Mar. Drugs. 2009;7:130. doi: 10.3390/md7020130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mayer AMS, Avilés E, Rodríguez AD. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012;20:279. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.10.086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Garson MJ, Simpson JS. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2004;21:164. doi: 10.1039/b302359c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.a Wratten SJ, Faulkner DJ, Hirotsu K, Clardy J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978:4345. [Google Scholar]; b Ciavatta ML, Fontana A, Puliti R, Scognamiglio G, Cimino G. Tetrahedron. 1999;55:12629. [Google Scholar]; c Ciavatta ML, Gavagnin M, Manzo E, Puliti R, Mattia CA, Mazzarella L, Cimino G, Simpson JS, Garson MJ. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:8049. [Google Scholar]
- 8.a Schnermann MJ, Shenvi RA. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015;32:543. doi: 10.1039/c4np00109e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Piers E, Llinas-Brunet M. J. Org. Chem. 1989;54:1483. [Google Scholar]; c Piers E, Llinas-Brunet M, Oballa RM. Can. J. Chem. 1993;71:1484. [Google Scholar]; d Miyaoka H, Abe Y, Kawashima E. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2012;60:1224. doi: 10.1248/cpb.c12-00485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Miyaoka H, Okubo Y. Synlett. 2011:547. [Google Scholar]; f Corey EJ, Magriotis PA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:287. [Google Scholar]; g Piers E, Romero MA. Tetrahedron. 1993;49:5791. [Google Scholar]; h Schtndeler TW. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of British Columbia; Jan, 1998. Total Synthesis of (+)-8-Isocyano-10-Cycloamphilectene. [Google Scholar]
- 9.a Rodríguez AD, Piña IC, Acosta AL, Ramírez C, Soto JJ. J. Org. Chem. 2001;66:648. doi: 10.1021/jo001025j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Rodríguez AD, Piña IC, Acosta AL, Barnes CL. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:93. [Google Scholar]; c Rodríguez AD, Soto JJ, Barnes CL. J. Org. Chem. 2000;65:7700. doi: 10.1021/jo000996w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.a Avilés E, Rodríguez AD. Org. Lett. 2010;12:5290. doi: 10.1021/ol102351z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Avilés E, Rodríguez AD, Vicente J. J. Org. Chem. 2013;78:11294. doi: 10.1021/jo401846m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Avilés E, Prudhomme J, Le Roch KG, Rodríguez AD. Tetrahedron. 2015;71:487. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2014.11.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d König GM, Wright AD, Angerhofer CK. J. Org. Chem. 1996;61:3259. [Google Scholar]; e Wright AD, Wang H, Gurrath M, König GM, Kocak G, Neumann G, Loria P, Foley M, Tilley L. J. Med. Chem. 2001;44:873. doi: 10.1021/jm0010724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Wright AD, McCluskey A, Robertson MJ, MacGregor KA, Gordon CP, Guenther J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:400. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00326c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Sandoval IT, Manos EJ, Van Wagoner RM, Delacruz RGC, Edes K, Winge DR, Ireland CM, Jones DA. Chem. Biol. 2013;20:753. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.a Dömling A, Ugi I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000;39:3168–3210. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20000915)39:18<3168::aid-anie3168>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Dömling A. Chem. Rev. 2006;106:17. doi: 10.1021/cr0505728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.a Zhu J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003:1133. [Google Scholar]; b Akritopoulou-Zanze I. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008;12:324. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Rotstein BH, Zaretsky S, Rai V, Yudin AK. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:8323. doi: 10.1021/cr400615v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.a Musonda CC, Taylor D, Lehman J, Gut J, Rosentahl PJ, Chibale K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004;14:3901. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Musonda CC, Gut J, Rosenthal PJ, Yardley V, Carvalho de Souza RC, Chibale K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006;14:5605. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.a Dascombe MJ, Drew MG, Morris H, Wilairat P, Auparakkitanon S, Moule WA, Alizadeh-Shekalgourabi S, Evans PG, Lloyd M, Dyas AM, Carr P, Ismail FM. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:5423. doi: 10.1021/jm0408013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Dömling A, Achatz S, Beck B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007;17:5483. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.04.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Vandekerckhove S, D'hooghe M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015;23:5098. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.a Dömling A, Kehagia K, Ugi I. Tetrahedron. 1995;51:9519. [Google Scholar]; b Gedey S, Van der Eycken J, Fülöp F. Org. Lett. 2002;4:1967. doi: 10.1021/ol025986r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tyagi V, Khan S, Shivahare R, Srivastava K, Gupta S, Kidwai S, Srivastava K, Puri SK, Chauhan PMS. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013;23:291. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.10.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Greco A, Ajmone-Cat MA, Nicolini A, Sciulli MG, Minghetti L. J. Neurosci. Res. 2003;71:844. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ajmone-Cat MA, Nicolini A, Minghetti L. J. Neurosci. Res. 2001;66:715. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fiebich BL, Lieb K, Hull M, Aicher B, van Ryn J, Pairet M, Engelhardt G. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:2205. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(00)00045-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




