Abstract
Bacillus niameyensis sp. nov. strain SIT3T (= CSUR P1266 = DSM 29725) is the type strain of B. niameyensis sp. nov. This Gram-positive strain was isolated from the digestive flora of a child with kwashiorkor and is a facultative anaerobic rod and a member of the Bacillaceae family. This organism is hereby described alongside its complete genome sequence and annotation. The 4 286 116 bp long genome (one chromosome but no plasmid) contains 4130 protein-coding and 66 RNA genes including five rRNA genes.
Keywords: Bacillus niameyensis, culturomics, genome, malnutrition, taxonogenomics
Introduction
Bacillus niameyensis strain SIT3T (= CSUR P1266 = DSM 29725) is the type strain of B. niameyensis sp. nov. This bacterium is a Gram-positive bacillus, spore-forming, facultative anaerobic, and motile. It was isolated from the stool of a child living in Niamey, Niger, afflicted with kwashiorkor. This isolation was part of a culturomics study of the gut microbiota of children with severe acute malnutrition aiming to characterize their microbiota. Culturomics aims to explore as exhaustively as possible a microbial ecosystem using multiple culture conditions [1], [2].
Phylogenetic relationships based on the 16S ribosomal RNA gene are currently used for bacterial classification alongside phenotypic and genotypic characteristics [3], [4], [5]. However, with the development of genomic sequencing and its decreasing cost, a new concept of bacterial description has been used in our laboratory [2], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] combining a proteomics description with the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) profile [12] associated with a biochemical and genomic description of the new bacterial species.
The genus Bacillus was established in 1872 by Cohn and encompasses over 200 described species and subspecies belonging to the Firmicutes phylum. Bacillus species are strictly aerobic and facultative anaerobic rod-shaped bacteria that form heat-resisting endospores [12], [13], [14], [15]. They are often found in the environment (water, soil, air), food, plants and human clinical samples [16]. Some Bacillus species, such as Bacillus thuringiensis, are known to be pathogenic for insects and are used as biological control agents for crops [14].
Materials and methods
Organism information: classification and features
A stool sample was collected from a 2-year-old boy living in Niamey, Niger, with kwashiorkor, a form of severe acute malnutrition. Consent was obtained from the child's parents at the National Hospital of Niamey and the study was approved by the Institut Fédératif de Recherche 48, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France, under agreement 09-022. The patient did not receive antibiotics at the time of sample collection, and the fecal sample was stored at −80°C.
Strain identification
The stool sample was cultured using the culturomics concept [2]. MALDI-TOF was used for colony identification as described below. In case of a failed identification using this technique, the 16S ribosomal RNA was sequenced. Stackebrandt and Ebers [17] suggested that a similarity level lower than 98.7% defined a new species (Fig. 1) without performing DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH). This similarity value is below the 16S rRNA threshold of 98.7% set by Stackebrandt and Ebers to delineate a new species without carrying out DDH.
Fig. 1.
Phylogenetic tree highlighting position of Bacillus niameyensis sp. nov. strain SIT3 (= CSUR P1266 = DSM 29725) relative to other type strains within Bacillus genus. Strains and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA genes are Bacillus amyloliquefaciensAB006920, Bacillus bataviensisAJ542508, Bacillus drentensisAJ542506, Bacillus endophyticusvAF295302, Bacillus galactosidilyticusAJ535638, Bacillus idriensisAY904033, Bacillus mojavensisAB021191, Bacillus infantisAY904032, Bacillus niaciniAB021194, Bacillus novalisAJ542512, Bacillus pseudomycoides AF13121, Bacillus pocheonensisAB245377, Bacillus thuringiensisD16281, Bacillus thermoamylovoransL27478. Sequences were aligned using Clustal W (http://www.clustal.org/clustal2/), and phylogenetic inferences were obtained using maximum-likelihood method within MEGA 6 (http://www.megasoftware.net/mega.php). Numbers at nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating analysis 1000 times to generate majority consensus tree. Clostridium butyricumAJ458420 was used as outgroup. Scale bar = 1% nucleotide sequence divergence.
Phenotypic characteristics
Phenotypic characteristics like Gram staining (Fig. 2), sporulation, motility, catalase and oxidase were highlighted as previously described [18]. Biochemical features of our strain were investigated using API 20NE, ZYM and 50 CH strips according to the manufacturer's instructions (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France). Various growth temperatures (25, 30, 37, 45 and 56°C) and atmospheres were tested. Growth under anaerobic and microaerophilic conditions occurrence was tested using GENbag Anaer and GENbag miroaer systems, respectively (bioMérieux). Aerobic growth was achieved with or without 5% CO2.
Fig. 2.
Gram staining of B. niameyensis strain SIT3T.
In order to perform the electronic microscopy to observe our strain (Fig. 3), detection Formvar-coated grids were deposited on a 40 μL bacterial suspension drop and incubated during 30 minutes at 37°C. The grids were incubated for 10 seconds on ammonium molybdate 1%, dried on blotting paper and then observed with a Morgani 268D transmission electron microscope (Philips/FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) at an operating voltage of 60 kV.
Fig. 3.
Transmission electron microscopy of B. niameyensis strain SIT3, using Morgani 268D transmission electron microscope (Philips/FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) at operating voltage of 60 kV. Scale bar = 500 nm.
MALDI-TOF protein analysis was carried out as previously described [12], [19] using a Microflex spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany). Twelve individual colonies were deposited on a MTP 96 MALDI-TOF target plate (Bruker). The 12 spectra were imported into the MALDI BioTyper software (version 2.0, Bruker) and analysed by standard pattern matching (with default parameter settings) against the main spectra of 6.252 bacteria, including 199 spectra from 104 validly named Bacillus species used as reference data in the BioTyper database. A score enabled the presumptive identification and discrimination of the tested species from those in a database: a score of >2 with a validated species enabled the identification at the species level, and a score of <1.7 did not enable any identification. No significant score was obtained for strain SIT3T, thus suggesting that our isolate was not a member of any known species. The reference spectrum for strain SIT3T (Fig. 4) was incremented in our database and then compared to other known species of the Bacillus genus. The differences are shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 4.
Reference mass spectrum from B. niameyensis strain SIT3T. Spectra from 12 individual colonies were compared and reference spectrum generated.
Fig. 5.
Gel view comparing B. niameyensis (= CSUR P1266 = DSM 29725) to other species within genus Bacillus. Gel view displays raw spectra of loaded spectrum files arranged in pseudo-gel-like look. X-axis records m/z value. Left y-axis displays running spectrum number originating from subsequent spectra loading. Peak intensity expressed by greyscale scheme code. Color bar and right y-axis indicate relation between color peak, with peak intensity in arbitrary units. Displayed species are indicated at left.
Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation
B. niameyensis strain SIT3T (= CSUR P1266 = DSM 29725) was grown on 5% sheep's blood–enriched Columbia agar (bioMérieux) at 37°C in aerobic atmosphere. Bacteria grown on three petri dishes were collected and resuspended in 4 × 100 μL of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer. Then 200 μL of this suspension was diluted in 1 mL TE buffer for lysis treatment that included a 30-minute incubation with 2.5 μg/μL lysozyme at 37°C, followed by an overnight incubation with 20 μg/μL proteinase K at 37°C. Extracted DNA was then purified using three successive phenol–chloroform extractions and ethanol precipitations at −20°C overnight. After centrifugation, the DNA was resuspended in 160 μL TE buffer.
Genome sequencing and assembly
Genomic DNA of Bacillus niameyensis was sequenced on the MiSeq Technology (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with the mate pair strategy. The gDNA was bar coded in order to be mixed with 11 other projects with the Nextera Mate Pair sample prep kit (Illumina). gDNA was quantified by a Qubit assay with a high-sensitivity kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to 66.2 ng/μL. The mate pair library was prepared with 1 μg of genomic DNA using the Nextera mate pair Illumina guide. The genomic DNA sample was simultaneously fragmented and tagged with a mate pair junction adapter. The pattern of the fragmentation was validated on an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a DNA 7500 lab chip. The DNA fragments ranged in size from 1 to 11 kb, with an optimal size at 3.927 kb. No size selection was performed, and 505 ng of tagmented fragments were circularized. The circularized DNA was mechanically sheared to small fragments with an optimal at 597 bp on a Covaris device S2 (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) in microtubes. The library profile was visualized on a High Sensitivity Bioanalyzer LabChip (Agilent Technologies), and the final concentration library was measured at 59.2 nmol/L.
The libraries were normalized at 2 nM and pooled. After a denaturation step and dilution at 15 pM, the pool of libraries was loaded onto the reagent cartridge and then onto the instrument along with the flow cell. An automated cluster generation and sequencing run was performed in a single 39-hour run in a 2 × 251 bp.
Genome annotation and genome analysis
Open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal with default parameters, but the predicted ORFs were excluded if they were spanning a sequencing gap region (containing N). The predicted bacterial protein sequences were searched against the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) database using BLASTP (E value 1e−03, coverage 0.7 and identity percentage 30%). If no hit was found, it was searched against the NR database using BLASTP with an E value of 1e−03, coverage 0.7 and identity percentage 30%. If the sequence length was smaller than 80 aa, we used an E value of 1e−05. The tRNAScanSE tool [20] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using RNAmmer [21]. Lipoprotein signal peptides and the number of transmembrane helices were predicted using Phobius [22]. ORFans were identified if all the BLASTP analyses performed did not provide positive results (E value smaller than 1e−03 for ORFs with sequence size larger than 80 aa or E value smaller than 1e−05 for ORFs with sequence length smaller than 80 aa). Such parameter thresholds have already been used in previous studies to define ORFans.
Genomes were automatically retrieved from the 16S RNA tree using Xegen software (Phylopattern) [23]. For each selected genome, complete genome sequence, proteome genome sequence and Orfeome genome sequence were retrieved via File Transfer Protocol (FTP) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information. All proteomes were analysed with proteinOrtho [24]. Then for each couple of genomes, a similarity score was computed. This score is the mean value of nucleotide similarity between all couple of orthologues between the two genomes studied (average genomic identity of orthologous gene sequences, AGIOS) [25]. An annotation of the entire proteome was performed to define the distribution of functional classes of predicted genes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (using the same method than for the genome annotation). To evaluate the genomic similarity among studied Bacillus strains, we determined two parameters, dDDH – digital DDH (DNA-DNA Hybridization), which exhibits a high correlation with DDH [24], [25], and AGIOS [23], which was designed to be independent from DDH.
Results
Phenotypic description
Strain SIT3T (Table 1) was first isolated in May 2014 by a 15-day preincubation in blood culture with sheep blood and cultivation on 5% sheep blood–enriched Colombia agar (bioMérieux) in aerobic atmosphere at 37°C. This strain showed a 95.1% nucleotide sequence similarity with Bacillus lentus, the phylogenetically closest Bacillus species with a valid published name (Fig. 1).
Table 1.
Classification and general features of Bacillus niameyensis strain SIT3T
| Property | Term |
|---|---|
| Current classification | Domain: Bacteria |
| Phylum: Firmicutes | |
| Class: Bacilli | |
| Order: Bacillales | |
| Family: Bacillaceae | |
| Genus: Bacillus | |
| Species: Bacillus niameyensis | |
| Type strain: SIT3 | |
| Gram stain | Positive |
| Cell shape | Rod |
| Motility | Motile |
| Sporulation | sporulating |
| Temperature range | Mesophilic |
| Optimum temperature | 37°C |
Growth occurred between 28 and 45°C on blood-enriched Columbia agar (bioMérieux), with the optimal growth being obtained at 37°C after 48 hours of incubation. Optimal growth was achieved aerobically. Weak cell growth was observed under microaerophilic and anaerobic conditions. The motility test was positive, and the cells were sporulating. Colonies were translucent and 1 to 2 mm in diameter on sheep's blood–enriched Columbia agar. Cells were Gram-positive rods (Fig. 2). Under electron microscopy, the bacteria grown on agar had a mean diameter and length of 0.87 μm and 2.6 μm, respectively (Fig. 3).
Strain SIT3T exhibited catalase activity but was negative for oxidase.
Using an API ZYM strip (bioMérieux), positive reactions were observed for esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, naphtol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, β-galactosidase and N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase. Negative reactions were observed for acid phosphatase, lipase (C14), valine arylamidase, cysteine arylamidase, trypsin, alkaline phosphatase, α-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-fucosidase and α-mannosidase.
Using an API 20 NE strip, positive reactions were obtained for nitrate reduction, β-glucosidase and β-galactosidase. All other reactions were negative.
Using an API 50 CH strip (bioMérieux), positive reactions were recorded for methyl-αd-glucopyranoside, N-acetylglucosamine, esculin ferric citrate, d-maltose, d-trehalose and starch. Negative reactions were recorded for glycerol, erythritol, d-arabinose, l-arabinose, d-ribose, d-xylose, l-xylose, d-adonitol, methyl-βd-xylopranoside, d-galactose, d-glucose, d-fructose, d-mannose, l-sorbose, l-rhamnose, dulcitol, inositol, d-mannitol, d-sorbitol, methyl-αd-mannopyranoside, amygdaline, arbutin, salicin, d-cellobiose, d-lactose, d-melibiose, d-saccharose, inulin, d-raffinose, d-melezitose, glycogen, xylitol, gentiobiose, d-turanose, d-lyxose, d-tagatose, d-fucose, l-fucose, d-arabitol, l-arabitol, potassium gluconate, potassium 2-ketogluconate and potassium 5-ketogluconate.
Cells are susceptible to imipenem, metronidazole, doxycycline, rifampicin, vancomycin, amoxicillin, ceftriaxone and gentamicin (500 μg) and are resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin (15 μg).
The differences exhibited by the comparison with other representatives of the genus Bacillus are detailed in Table 2.
Table 2.
Differential characteristics of Bacillus niameyensis strain SIT3T, Bacillus hackensackii, Bacillus galactosidilyticus DSM 15595, Bacillus fordii DSM 16014, Bacillus fortis DSM 16012, Bacillus oceanisediminis JCM 16506, Bacillus sporothermodurans DSM 10599, Bacills infantis JCM 13438, Bacillus horneckiae MTCC 9535, Bacillus lentus ATCC 10840 [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]
| Property | B. niameyensis | B. hackensackii |
B. galactosi dilyticus |
B. fordii | B. fortis | B. oceanisediminis |
B. sporothermo durans |
B. infantis | B. horneckiae |
Bacillus lentus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell diameter (μm) | 0.7–1.0 | 2.0–8.0 | 0.7–0.9 | 0.6–0.8 | 0.6–0.8 | 0.6–0.8 | 0.7 | NA | 1.0–1.5 | 0.7–1.2 |
| Oxygen requirement | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Gram stain | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| Salt requirement | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | − | − |
| Motility | + | + | + | + | + | NA | + | NA | + | + |
| Endospore formation | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NA | + | + |
| Indole | − | − | − | − | − | + | NA | NA | − | NA |
| Production of | ||||||||||
| Alkaline phosphatase | − | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | + | NA |
| Catalase | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Oxidase | − | − | NA | + | + | + | + | − | − | NA |
| Nitrate reductase | + | − | + | NA | NA | + | − | NA | + | − |
| Urease | − | + | +/− | NA | NA | − | − | NA | − | + |
| β-Galactosidase | + | NA | + | NA | NA | + | NA | NA | − | NA |
| N-acetyl-glucosamine | + | NA | + | +/− | + | NA | NA | + | + | NA |
| Acid from: | ||||||||||
| l-Arabinose | − | − | +/− | w | − | − | NA | NA | + | + |
| Ribose | − | − | +/− | w | + | − | NA | + | − | NA |
| Mannose | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| Mannitol | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | + | + | + |
| Sucrose | − | − | +/− | − | − | + | NA | + | − | + |
| d-Glucose | − | − | w | − | + | + | − | + | − | + |
| d-Fructose | − | − | w | − | − | − | − | + | − | NA |
| d-Maltose | + | − | w | − | − | − | NA | + | + | NA |
| d-Lactose | − | +/− | − | − | − | − | + | − | NA | |
| Habitat | Human gut | Blood | Raw milk | Raw milk | Milking apparatus | Marine sediment | Milk | Blood | Spacecraft assembly | soil |
NA, data not available; w, weak reaction.
Genome properties
The genome of B. niameyensis strain SIT3T is 4 286 116 bp long with a 37.40% G + C content (Fig. 6, Table 3) and 46 generated contigs. Of the 4196 predicted genes, 4130 were protein-coding genes and 66 were RNAs. Of these 66 rRNA genes, one is a 16S rRNA gene, three are 5S RNA genes, one is a 23S rRNA and 61 predicted tRNA genes were identified in the genome. A total of 3068 genes (73.11%) were assigned a putative function. A total of 230 genes were identified as ORFans (5.42%). Using ARG-ANNOT [26], no resistance genes were found. Nevertheless, ten genes associated to polyketide synthase (PKS) or nonribosomal peptide synthase (NRPS) were discovered in the analysis of the genome. The remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The properties and statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Fig. 6.
Graphical circular map of chromosome. From outside to center: genes on forward strain colored by COGs categories (only gene assigned to COGs), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red), GC content and GC skew. COGs, Clusters of Orthologous Groups database.
Table 3.
Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome
| Attribute | Genome (total) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Value | % of totala | |
| Size (bp) | 4 286 116 | 100 |
| G + C content (bp) | 1 603 007 | 37.4 |
| Coding region (bp) | 3 665 154 | 85.51 |
| Total genes | 4196 | 100 |
| RNA genes | 66 | 1.57 |
| Protein-coding genes | 4130 | 98.42 |
| Genes with function prediction | 3058 | 72.88 |
| CRISPRs | 7 | 0.16 |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 2694 | 64.20 |
| Genes with peptide signals | 294 | 7.0 |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 1180 | 28.12 |
| Genes associated to PKS or NRPS | 10 | 0.23 |
| Genes associated to mobilome | 2198 | 51.80 |
| Genes associated to toxin/antitoxin | 111 | 2.61 |
| Genes associated to resistance genes | 0 | 0 |
| Genes with paralogues (E value 1e−10) | 1317 | 31.03 |
| Genes larger than 5000 nt | 2 | 0.05 |
COGs, Clusters of Orthologous Groups database; CRISPR, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat; NRPS, nonribosomal peptide synthase; PKS, polyketide synthase.
Total is based on either size of genome (bp) or total number of protein coding genes in annotated genome.
Table 4.
Number of genes associated with the 25 general COGs functional categories
| Code | Value | % of totala | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| J | 180 | 4.36 | Translation |
| A | 0 | 0.00 | RNA processing and modification |
| K | 297 | 7.19 | Transcription |
| L | 185 | 4.48 | Replication, recombination and repair |
| B | 1 | 0.02 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| D | 36 | 0.87 | Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis |
| Y | 0 | 0.00 | Nuclear structure |
| V | 111 | 2.69 | Defense mechanisms |
| T | 186 | 4.50 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| M | 173 | 4.19 | Cell wall/membrane biogenesis |
| N | 64 | 1.55 | Cell motility |
| Z | 0 | 0.00 | Cytoskeleton |
| W | 0 | 0.00 | Extracellular structures |
| U | 44 | 1.07 | Intracellular trafficking and secretion |
| O | 99 | 2.40 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| C | 156 | 3.78 | Energy production and conversion |
| G | 351 | 8.50 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| E | 279 | 6.76 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| F | 86 | 2.08 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| H | 97 | 2.35 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| I | 85 | 2.06 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| P | 218 | 5.28 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| Q | 73 | 1.77 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
| R | 520 | 12.59 | General function prediction only |
| S | 326 | 7.89 | Function unknown |
| — | 374 | 8.91 | Not in COGs |
COGs, Clusters of Orthologous Groups database.
Total is based on either size of genome (bp) or total number of protein coding genes in annotated genome.
Genome comparison
Bacillus oceanideminis, Bacillus nealsonii, Bacillus firmus, Bacillus infantis and Bacillus fordii are closely related species to B. niameyensis with available genomes (Table 5) and were thus chosen for this comparative analysis. The draft genome sequence of Bacillus niameyensis is smaller than those of Bacillus oceanisediminis, Bacillus nealsonii, Bacillus firmus, Bacillus infantis and Bacillus fordii (5.76, 4.98, 4.97, 4.88, 4.62 and 4.51 MB, respectively) but larger than those of Bacillus badius (4.04 MB). It should be noted that the size of our genome is an estimation because 46 contigs were obtained in the sequencing of the genome.
Table 5.
Closely related species with Bacillus niameyensis
| Name of species | Similarity (%) | Accession No. |
|---|---|---|
| Bacillus niameyensis | 100 | LK985389 |
| Bacillus oceanisediminis | 94.88 | KP120947.1 |
| Bacillus nealsonii | 94.45 | KC433938.1 |
| Bacillus firmus | 93.50 | KF478238.1 |
| Bacillus infantis | 94.60 | KP696715.1 |
| Bacillus fordii | 95.56 | NR_025786.1 |
The G + C content of Bacillus niameyensis is smaller than those of Bacillus infantis, Bacillus badius, Bacillus firmus, Bacillus fordii and Bacillus oceanisediminis (46.0, 43.90, 41.40, 41.20 and 40.8%, respectively) but larger than those of Bacillus nealsonii and Clostridium butyricum (35.1 and 28.8%).
The gene content of Bacillus niameyensis is smaller than those of Bacillus oceanisediminis Bacillus nealsonii, Bacillus infantis, Bacillus badius, Bacillus fordii, Bacillus firmus and Clostridium butyricum (5722, 4864, 4837, 4486, 4229, 4229 and 4231, respectively). However the distribution of genes into COGs categories was similar in all compared genomes (Table 6, Fig. 7). In addition, Bacillus niameyensis shared 4130, 4486, 4142, 4688, 4142, 4789, 5578 and 4152 orthologous genes with Bacillus badius, Bacillus firmus, Bacillus fordii, Bacillus infantis, Bacillus nealsonii, Bacillus oceanisediminis and Clostridium butyricum (Table 7). Among species with standing in nomenclature, AGIOS values ranged from 61.24 between Bacillus niameyensis and Bacillus badius to 63.04% between Bacillus oceanisediminis and Bacillus nealsonii.
Table 6.
Number of orthologous proteins shared between genomes (upper right)a
| Bacillus niameyensis | Bacillus badius | Bacillus firmus | Bacillus fordii | Bacillus infantis | Bacillus nealsonii | Bacillus oceanisediminis |
Clostridium butyricum |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacillus niameyensis | 4,130 | 1,511 | 1,769 | 1,648 | 1,800 | 1,658 | 1,846 | 832 |
| Bacillus badius | 61.24 | 4,486 | 1,940 | 1,730 | 1,886 | 1,601 | 2,040 | 838 |
| Bacillus firmus | 61.8 | 62.60 | 4,142 | 1,956 | 2,634 | 2,062 | 3,039 | 971 |
| Bacillus fordii | 65.06 | 61.82 | 62.01 | 4,688 | 1,842 | 1,608 | 2,069 | 824 |
| Bacillus infantis | 59.99 | 62.25 | 67.18 | 61.3 | 4,142 | 2,074 | 2,728 | 946 |
| Bacillus nealsonii | 61.44 | 60.15 | 62.84 | 59.95 | 61.08 | 4,789 | 2,149 | 957 |
| Bacillus oceanisediminis | 61.82 | 62.67 | 88.49 | 62.03 | 67.17 | 63.04 | 5,578 | 1,012 |
| Clostridium butyricum | 54.21 | 51.46 | 52.78 | 52.44 | 50.8 | 54.49 | 52.8 | 4,152 |
Average percentage similarity of nucleotides corresponding to orthologous proteins shared between genomes (lower left) and numbers of proteins per genome.
Fig. 7.
Distribution of functional classes of predicted genes according to clusters of orthologous groups of proteins.
Table 7.
Pairwise comparison of Bacillus niameyensis with eight other species using GGDC, formula 2 (DDH estimates based on identities/HSP length)a[27], [28]
| Bacillus niameyensis | Bacillus badius | Bacillus firmus | Bacillus fordii | Bacillus infantis | Bacillus nealsonii | Bacillus oceanisediminis | Clostridium butyricum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacillus niameyensis | 100% ± 00 | 2.53% ± 0.18 | 2.53% ± 0.20 | 2.54% ± 0.22 | 2.54% ± 0.13 | 2.54% ± 0.20 | 2.53% ± 0.22 | 2.53% ± 0.17 |
| Bacillus badius | 100% ± 00 | 2.54% ± 0.19 | 2.53% ± 0.17 | 2.55% ± 0.18 | 2.53% ± 0.17 | 2.54% ± 0.21 | 2.53% ± 0.19 | |
| Bacillus firmus | 100% ± 00 | 2.53% ± 0.19 | 2.60% ± 0.22 | 2.55% ± 0.20 | 3.04% ± 0.11 | 2.53% ± 0.18 | ||
| Bacillus fordii | 100% ± 00 | 2.53% ± 0.18 | 2.53% ± 0.17 | 2.53% ± 0.19 | 2.52% ± 0.18 | |||
| Bacillus infantis | 100% ± 00 | 2.54% ± 0.15 | 2.60% ± 0.21 | 2.53% ± 0.18 | ||||
| Bacillus nealsonii | 100% ± 00 | 2.56% ± 0.16 | 2.53% ± 0.18 | |||||
| Bacillus. oceanisediminis | 100% ± 00 | 2.53% ± 0.18 | ||||||
| Clostridium butyricum | 100% ± 00 |
DDH, DNA-DNA hybridization; GGDC, genome-to-genome distance; HSP, high-scoring pair.
Confidence intervals indicate inherent uncertainty in estimating DDH values from intergenomic distances based on models derived from empirical test data sets (which are always limited in size). These results are in accordance with the 16S rRNA (Fig. 1) and phylogenetic analyses as well as GGDC results.
Conclusion
On the basis of phenotypic, phylogenetic and genomic analyses, we formally propose the creation of Bacillus niameyensis sp. nov. that contains the strain SIT3T. This bacterial strain was isolated from the fecal flora of a 2-year-old boy from Niamey, Niger, with kwashiorkor.
Taxonomic and nomenclatural proposals
Description of Bacillus niameyensis strain SIT3T sp. nov.
Cells are Gram-positive, sporulating, rod-shaped bacilli with a diameter of 0.1 μm. Colonies are translucent and 1 to 2 mm in diameter on 5% sheep's blood–enriched Columbia agar (bioMérieux). Cells are catalase positive and oxidase negative. Positive reactions were observed for esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, α-chymotrypsin, naphtol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, β-galactosidase and N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase. Negative reactions were observed for acid phosphatase, lipase (C14), valine arylamidase, cysteine arylamidase, trypsin, alkaline phosphatase, α-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, α-fucosidase and α-mannosidase.
Cells are susceptible to imipenem, metronidazole, doxycycline, rifampicin, vancomycin, amoxicillin, ceftriaxone and gentamycin (500 μg) and are resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin (15 μg).
The G + C content of the genome is 37.40%. The 16S rRNA gene sequence and whole-genome shotgun sequence of B. niameyensis strain SIT3T are deposited in GenBank under accession numbers LK955389 and CTDY01000000, respectively. The type strain SIT3T (= CSUR P1266 = DSM 29725) was isolated from the stool of a child living in Niamey, Niger, with kwashiorkor.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Xegen Company (http://www.xegen.fr/) for automating the genomic annotation process. This study was funded by the Méditerranée Infection Foundation. We thank Karolina Griffiths for English-language review.
References
- 1.Dubourg G., Lagier J.C., Armougom F. The gut microbiota of a patient with resistant tuberculosis is more comprehensively studied by culturomics than by metagenomics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;32:637–645. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1787-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lagier J.C., Armougom F., Million M. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:1185–1193. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Viale A.M., Arakaki A.K., Soncini F.C. Evolutionnary relationships among eubacterial groups as inferred from GroEL (Chaperonin) sequences comparison. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1944;44:527–533. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-3-527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Woese C.R., Kandler O., Wheelis M.L. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposals for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:4576–4579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wolf M., Muller T., Dandekar T. Phylogeny of firmicutes with special reference to Mycoplasma (Mollicutes) as inferred from phosphoglycerate kinase amino acid sequence data. Inst J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54(pt 3):871–875. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02868-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hugon P., Mishra A.K., Lagier J.C. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Brevibacillus massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;8:1–14. doi: 10.4056/sigs.3466975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kokcha S., Ramasamy D., Lagier J.C. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Brevibacterium senegalense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2012;7:233–245. doi: 10.4056/sigs.3256677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lagier J.C., El Karkouri K., Nguyen T.T. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Anaerococcus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2012;6:116–125. doi: 10.4056/sigs.2415480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lagier J.C., Armougom F., Mishra A.K. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2012;6:315–324. doi: 10.4056/sigs.2685971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lagier J.C., Elkarkouri K., Rivet R. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Senegalemassilia anaerobia gen. nov., sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;7:343–356. doi: 10.4056/sigs.3246665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lagier J.C., El Karkouri K., Mishra A.K. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Enterobacter massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;7:399–412. doi: 10.4056/sigs.3396830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seng P., Drancourt M., Gouriet F. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:543–551. doi: 10.1086/600885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fritze D. Taxonomy of the genus Bacillus and related genera: the aerobic endospore-forming bacteria. Physiopathology. 2004;94:1245–1248. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gordon R.E., Haynes W.C., Pang C.H. The genus Bacillus. US Dep Agric Handh. 1973;427 [Google Scholar]
- 15.Priest F.G., Goodfellow M., Todd C. A numerical classification of the genus Bacillus. J Gen Microbiol. 1988;134:1847–1882. doi: 10.1099/00221287-134-7-1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goto K., Omura T., Hara Y., Sadaie Y. Application of the 16S rDNA sequence as an index for rapid identification of species in the genus Bacillus. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2000;46:1–8. doi: 10.2323/jgam.46.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stackebrandt E., Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today. 2006;33:152–155. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lagier J.C., Edouard S., Pagnier I., Mediannikov O., Drancourt M., Raoult D. Current and past strategies for bacterial culture in clinical microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:208–236. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00110-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Seng P., Abat C., Rolain J.M. Identification of rare pathogenic bacteria in a clinical microbiology laboratory: impact of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2182–2194. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00492-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bendtsen J.D., Nielsen H., von Heijne G. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004;340:783–795. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lowe T.M., Eddy S.R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Käll L., Krogh A., Sonnhammer E.L. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J Mol Biol. 2004;338:1027–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gouret P., Thompson J.D., Pontarotti P. PhyloPattern: regular expressions to identify complex patterns in phylogenetic trees. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10:298. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lechner M., Findeib S., Steiner L. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ramasamy D., Mishra A.K., Lagier J.C. A polyphasic strategy incorporating genomic data for the taxonomic description of new bacterial species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:384–391. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.057091-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gupka S.K., Padmanabhan B.R., Diene S.M. ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatics tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:212–220. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01310-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Auch A.F., Von Jan M., Klenk H.P. DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010;2:117–134. doi: 10.4056/sigs.531120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meier-Kolthoff J.P., Auch A.F., Klenk H.P., Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hong T., Heibler N., Tang Y. “Bacillus hackensackii” sp. nov., a novel carbone dioxide sensitive bacterium isolated from blood culture. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;45:143–147. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00502-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Heyndrickx M., Logan N.A., Lebbe L. Bacillus galactosidilyticus sp. nov., an alkali-tolerant beta-galactosidase producer. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:617–621. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02816-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Scheldeman P., Rodriguez-Diaz M., Goris J. Heyndrickx M. Bacillus farraginis sp. nov., Bacillus fortis sp. nov., Bacillus fordii sp. nov., isolated from dairy farms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:1355–1364. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63095-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang J., Wang J., Fang C. Bacillus oceanisediminis sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:2924–2929. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.019851-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pettersson B., Lembke F., Hammer P. Bacillus sporothermodurans, a new species producing highly heat-resistant endospores. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1996;46:759–763. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-3-759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ko K.S., Oh W.S., Lee M.Y., Lee Bacillus infantis sp. nov. and Bacillus idriensis sp. nov., isolated from a patient with a neonatal sepsis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:2541–2544. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64213-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vaishampayan P., Probst A., Krishnamurthi S. Bacillus horneckiae sp. nov., isolated from a spacecraft-assembly clean room. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:1031–1037. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.008979-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gordon R.E., Hyde J.L., Moore J.A., Jr. Bacillus firmus–Bacillus lentus: a series or one species? Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1977;27:256–262. [Google Scholar]







