Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Infect. 2015 Jun 14;71(4):447–457. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.06.005

Clinical MRSA isolates from skin and soft tissue infections show increased in vitro production of phenol soluble modulins

Nicholas R Berlon a, Robert Qi a, Batu K Sharma-Kuinkel a, Hwang-Soo Joo b, Lawrence P Park a, Dennis George a, Joshua T Thaden a, Julia A Messina a, Stacey A Maskarinec a, Manica Mueller-Premru c, Eugene Athan d, Pierre Tattevin e, Juan M Pericas f, Christopher W Woods a, Michael Otto b, Vance G Fowler Jr a,*
PMCID: PMC4816458  NIHMSID: NIHMS767691  PMID: 26079275

Summary

Background

Phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) are amphipathic, pro-inflammatory proteins secreted by most Staphylococcus aureus isolates. This study tested the hypothesis that in vitro PSM production levels are associated with specific clinical phenotypes.

Methods

177 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates from infective endocarditis (IE), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI), and hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP) were matched by geographic origin, then genotyped using spa-typing. In vitro PSM production was measured by high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared or Kruskal–Wallis tests as appropriate.

Results

Spa type 1 was significantly more common in SSTI isolates (62.7% SSTI; 1.7% IE; 16.9% HAP; p < 0.0001) while HAP and IE isolates were more commonly spa type 2 (0% SSTI; 37.3% IE; 40.7% HAP; p < 0.0001). USA300 isolates produced the highest levels of PSMs in vitro. SSTI isolates produced significantly higher quantities of PSMα1-4, PSMβ1, and δ-toxin than other isolates (p < 0.001). These findings persisted when USA300 isolates were excluded from analysis.

Keywords: Phenol soluble modulin, MRSA, Skin and soft tissue infection, Pneumonia, Endocarditis

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus causes a diverse array of human infections including infective endocarditis (IE),1 skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI),2 and hospital-acquired/ventilator-acquired pneumonia (HAP).3 Although the repertoire of virulence factors produced by a particular clone of S. aureus is thought to influence the type of infection that it causes, this association is poorly understood.

Phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs) are small, amphipathic proteins that contribute to bacterial pathogenesis4,5 and are widely present in S. aureus.6 Eight such proteins have been identified in S. aureus: six are 20–25 amino acid long α-types (PSMα1-4, δ-toxin, PSM-mec) and two are 44 amino acid long β-types (PSMβ1, PSMβ2).5 PSMα peptides are co-transcribed from the psmα and PSMβ peptides from the psmβ locus.32 The δ-toxin (gene hld) is encoded within RNAIII, the regulatory molecule of the accessory gene regulator (agr) locus. All PSMs are under strict and direct regulation by agr.32 PSM peptides are produced by all S. aureus strains (except naturally occurring agr mutants) due to location of the encoding genes on the core genome or on widely distributed pathogenicity islands.6 The SCCmec-encoded PSM-mec is found on specific SCCmec elements (types II, III, and VIII) and is also agr-regulated, although the precise mechanism of agr regulation of psm-mec expression is unknown.36,37 Owing to co-transcription, the values of different PSMα peptides, as well as those of the PSMβ peptides, are closely linked to each other, although differential proteolytic processing or export may theoretically lead to differences of concentration of secreted peptide. Furthermore, regulation of all PSMs by agr is usually reflected by a relatively constant shift of concentrations of all PSM peptides under different conditions.

A growing body of evidence from both in vitro and in vivo studies suggests that PSMs are important in the development of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). PSMs and their proteolytic products facilitate S. aureus colonization7 and dispersion8 on skin. In animal studies, PSM deletion strains of S. aureus cause smaller SSTI lesions in both mice9 and rabbits10 relative to isogenic wild type strains. PSM production is also significantly higher in USA300, a community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) strain strongly associated with SSTI in the United States,11 than other variants of MRSA.9,12

Based on these observations, we hypothesized that MRSA isolates obtained from SSTIs produce higher levels of PSMs than isolates associated with other infection types. To test this hypothesis, we utilized a unique resource of well-characterized international MRSA isolates from multiple infection sites including SSTI,13,14 HAP,15 and IE.16,17

Materials and methods

S. aureus isolates

IE isolates were obtained from the Microbiologic Repository of the International Collaboration on Endocarditis – Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS).16 The repository contains >1600 isolates collected prospectively between June 2000 and September 2006 from patients with definite or possible IE at 24 sites in 12 countries.18 Patients met all of the following inclusion criteria: prospective identification at a center with a minimum of 12 cases per year and access to cardiac surgery, adequate records to complete a 275 item standard case report form, and evaluation at time of initial presentation.17 Bacterial specimens were collected from all patients through blood cultures.

SSTI isolates were obtained from a repository created as part of the Assessment of Telavancin in cSSSI (ATLAS) trials, two methodologically identical, randomized, multinational, parallel-group active-controlled phase III clinical trials including 2079 patients from 129 centers in 21 countries.13 Patients met all of the following inclusion criteria: male or non-pregnant female aged ≥18 years old, diagnosis of complicated SSTI caused by a suspected or confirmed gram-positive organism, and need for ≥7 days of parenteral antibiotic therapy. Bacterial specimens were collected from all patients through needle aspiration or, if necessary, surgical procedures.13,14

HAP isolates were obtained from a repository created as part of the Assessment of Telavancin for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (ATTAIN) trials,15 two methodologically identical, randomized, multinational, parallel-group double-blinded phase III clinical trials including 1532 patients from 274 centers in 38 countries. Patients met both of the following inclusion criteria: male or non-pregnant female aged ≥18 years old, and diagnosis of pneumonia acquired after 48 h in an inpatient, acute, or chronic care facility or which developed within 1 week of discharge from one of these facilities. Bacterial specimens were collected from all patients through blood cultures and respiratory samples.

Definitions

IE was defined according to the modified Duke criteria.18 SSTI was defined by the presence of at least one of the following: cellulitis, abscess requiring surgical drainage, infected wound or ulcer, or infected burn. In addition, purulent drainage, fluid collection, or ≥3 of the following signs and symptoms were required: erythema; heat and/or localized warmth, fluctuance, swelling and/or induration, pain and/or tenderness to palpation, fever with temperature >38 °C, or WBC count >10,000 cells/mm3 or >15% bands.13 HAP was defined as identification of an organism consistent with a respiratory pathogen in respiratory tract or blood, or as the presence of ≥2 of the following: cough, purulent sputum, auscultatory findings, dyspnea, tachypnea, or hypoxemia. Patients were additionally required to have ≥2 of the following: temperature >38 °C or <35 °C, respiratory rate >30 breaths/min, pulse ≥120 beats/min, altered mental status, need for mechanical ventilation, or white blood cell count >10,000 cells/mm3, <4500 cells/mm3, or >15% bands. All patients were required to have new or progressive infiltrates, consolidation, and an adequate respiratory specimen for Gram stain and culture.15 All MRSA isolates meeting these definitions were considered for inclusion in this study.

USA300 strains were defined by the presence of all of the following: 1) spa type 1 or inferred genotype, 2) presence of the genetic elements for both Panton Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) and Arginine Catabolic Mobile Element (ACME) by PCR, and 3) confirmatory USA300 genotype by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) in all SSTI isolates.19

Matching methods

Each clinical group (IE, HAP, and SSTI) was sorted and matched 1:1:1 by continent with the total number included from each being dictated by the clinical group with the fewest isolates arising from that continent. In the event that one or both remaining studies had isolates in excess of this amount, inclusion was determined by taking every X’th isolate such that the totals selected for each continent were all equivalent, with X being defined as (number of isolates in larger study)/(number of isolates in smallest study).

Growth and supernatant collection

Trypticase soy agar (TSA) plates were prepared, inoculated with specimens frozen in tryptic soy broth (TSB)/glycerol stock, and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Approximately 1 μL of this bacteria was inoculated into 10 mL TSB in 50 mL conical tubes and grown overnight at 37 °C and 200 RPM. The OD600 of each sample was then measured, and an amount of bacteria necessary to reach a calculated starting OD600 of 0.1 was added to new 50 mL conical tubes containing 10 mL TSB. These were grown for precisely 8 h at 37 °C and 200 RPM, then immediately placed on ice to arrest growth. Samples were centrifuged at 4 °C and 4000 RPM for 10 min at which time 9 mL of supernatant were collected from each and stored at −80 °C until further use.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)/Mass spectrometry

Quantitation of PSMs in the supernatant was performed using reversed phase HPLC/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (RP-HPLC/ESI-MS) as described previously9 by investigators who were blinded to the clinical source of the isolate. Analysis of the same supernatant was repeated and the two runs averaged to obtain final data for each isolate and PSM subtype.

Spa genotyping

TSA plates were inoculated with specimens frozen in TSB/glycerol stock and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Bacteria was harvested from the plates and then resuspended in 300 μL of Microbead solution containing 20 μL of lysostaphin. DNA was then extracted using the MoBio Ultraclean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was performed using TIGR-F and TIGR-R primers as described previously20 before submission to the Duke University DNA sequencing facility to obtain forward and reverse sequences. Approximately 10% of isolates selected at random underwent additional confirmatory spa typing for quality control purposes, with >90% of these matching in one run, and all matching after two confirmatory runs. In the event of poor sequences or discrepancies, isolates were re-cultured and the process repeated until a consensus was reached.

Spa type nomenclature

Spa types were assigned using the eGenomics online platform (http://tools.egenomics.com). Genotypes defined by the Ridom platform (http://www.ridom.de/), an alternative spa genotyping schema, were also provided for the most common identified strains encountered in the study.

Detection of ACME and PVL

Uniplex PCR was used to identify presence of arcA for ACME and lukS/F for PVL in all possible CC8 isolates with S. aureus genus-specific 16S rRNA serving as an internal control. S. aureus genomic DNA was extracted as described above. Two microliters of DNA from each isolate was PCR amplified under the following conditions using Platinum® Taq DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) and 0.2 μM of each forward and reverse primers [arcA-F 5′-GCAGCAGAATCTATTACTGAGCC-3′ and arcA-R 5′-TGCTAACTTTTCTATTGCTTGAGC-3′21; luk-PV-1 5′-ATCATTAGGTAAAATGTCTGGACATGATCCA-3′ and luk-PV-2 5′-GCATCAAGTGTATTGGATAGCAAAAGC-3′22; and 16S rRNA-F 5′-AACTCTGTTATTAGGGAAGAACA-3′ and 16S rRNA-R 5′-CCACCTTCCTCCGGTTTGTCACC-3′23]: an initial denaturation step of 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 60 s, 55 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 60 s followed by 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR amplicons (10 μl) were visualized using UV light after electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide.

PFGE

PFGE was performed on all SSTI isolates.24 PFGE banding patterns were analyzed with appropriate controls using Bio-Numerics software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) and defined as USA300 using standard definitions.19

Statistical methods

Simple descriptive statistics were used for bacterial production profiles with means presented for continuous variables. Differences in spa type distribution were measured with χ2 analysis. PSM production was quantitated and averaged across two runs of the same samples. Statistical differences in mean PSM production between groups were evaluated via separate Kruskal–Wallis tests for each peptide. In all cases a p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

This study was approved by the Duke University Medical Center Institutional Review Board.

Results

A total of 177 MRSA IE, SSTI, and HAP isolates forming 59 geographically-matched triplets were included in the analysis. Of the 59 triplets, 37 (62.7%) came from the United States, 16 (27.1%) came from Europe, and 6 (10.2%) came from Australia.

Patient characteristics

Patients with SSTI tended to be younger on average (45.2 years (SSTI) vs 63.2 years (IE) vs 65.4 years (HAP); p < 0.0001), but there was no significant difference in gender among clinical groups. Other illness-specific parameters for SSTI, HAP, and IE are presented in Tables 13, respectively.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of 59 patients with MRSA skin and soft tissue infection.

Parameter Value (n)
Demographic characteristics
 Mean age (yr) ± SD 45.2 ± 17.1
 Male sex 67.8% (40)
 White race 83.1% (49)
Source of infection
 Deep/extensive cellulitis 13.6% (8)
 Infected burn 6.8% (4)
 Infected ulcer 5.1% (3)
 Major abscess 54.2% (32)
 Wound 20.3% (12)
Geographical location
 North America 62.7% (37)
 Europe 27.1% (16)
 Australia 10.2% (6)
Prior antibiotic use
 ≤24 h of therapy 33.9% (20)
 >24 h of therapy 35.6% (21)
 No prior therapy 30.5% (18)
MRSA risk factors
 Hospitalization in previous 6 months 25.4% (15)
 Antibiotic treatment within previous 3 months 54.2% (32)
 Chronic illness 62.7% (37)
 Prior MRSA infection 20.3% (12)
 Admission from nursing home 1.7% (1)
 Surgical procedure during current stay 17.0% (10)
 Residence in area of MRSA endemicitiy 59.3% (35)
History of diabetes 13.6% (8)
Infection characteristics
 Fever (temp of >38 °C) 8.5% (5)
 WBC count of >10 × 109 cells/L) 39.0% (23)
 Baseline infection area >100 cm2 54.2% (32)
Clinical response at point of care
 Cure 89.8% (53)
 Not cured 10.2% (6)

Table 3.

Baseline characteristics of 59 patients with MRSA infective endocarditis.

Parameter Value (n)
Demographic characteristics
 Mean age (yr) ± SD 63.2 ± 15.6
 Male sex 52.5% (31)
Geographical location
 North America 62.7% (37)
 Europe 27.1% (16)
 Australia 10.2% (6)
Predisposing conditions
 Diabetes mellitus 44.8% (32)a
 Hemodialysis dependent 25.4% (15)
 History of cancer 15.3% (9)
Presumed place of acquisition
 Nosocomial 44.1% (26)
 Non-nosocomial healthcare-associated 39.0% (23)
 Community acquired 17.0% (10)
Type of endocarditis
 Native valve 61.4% (35)
 Prosthetic valve 24.6% (14)
 Other 14.0% (8)
 Not recorded 3.4% (2)
Clinical findings
 Fever (temp of >38 °C) 92.7% (51)c
 Conjunctival hemorrhage 10.3% (6)a
 Janeway lesions 3.5% (2)a
 Osler’s nodes 3.5% (2)a
 Roth spots 1.7% (1)a
 Rheumatoid factor elevation 1.8% (1)b
Echocardiographic findings
 New regurgitation 44.1% (26)
 Intracardiac vegetation 88.1% (52)
 Perivalvular abscess 5.1% (3)
Complications
 Stroke 20.3% (12)
 Congestive heart failure 27.1% (16)
 Intracardiac abscess 10.1% (6)
 Persistent bacteremia 47.5% (28)
In-hospital death 35.6% (21)
a

Data not recorded for one patient.

b

Data not recorded for three patients.

c

Data not recorded for four patients.

Spa genotyping

A total of 38 known and 5 new spa types were identified among the 177 isolates. Of these, the 5 most common spa types (1, 2, 3, 16, and 388 [Ridom nomenclature t008, t002, t037, t018, and t041, respectively]) accounted for 67.8% of the total collection (Fig. 1). The distribution of spa types differed significantly in the three clinical groups. Spa type 1 (Ridom t008) was significantly more common in the SSTI group (SSTI 38/59 [62.7%] vs HAP 10/59 [16.9%] vs IE 1/59 [1.7%]; p < 0.0001), while spa type 2 (Ridom t002) was more common in the HAP and IE groups (SSTI 0/59 [0%] vs HAP 24/59 [37.3%] vs IE 22/59 [40.7%], p < 0.0001).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Spa Type Distribution Among MRSA Isolates from Skin/Soft Tissue Infection (SSTI), Infective Endocarditis (IE), and Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP). 177 MRSA isolates from SSTI, IE, and HAP underwent spa typing, with the most common 5 spa types overall plotted above (n = 125; 71% of cohort). Using Chi-squared analysis, there is a significant difference in spa type distribution among clinical groups, with isolates from SSTI being significantly more likely to be spa type 1 (Ridom t008) and significantly less likely to be spa type 2 (Ridom t002; p < 0.0001).

Levels of in vitro PSM production

Levels of PSMα1, PSMα2, PSMα3, PSMα4, PSMβ1, and δ-toxin were significantly higher among SSTI isolates than either IE or HAP isolates (p values < 0.0001 for all; Fig. 2). By contrast, levels of PSM-mec were significantly lower among SSTI isolates than the other two clinical groups (p < 0.0001). Finally, levels of PSMβ2 were significantly lower in HAP isolates with relatively similar production in both IE and SSTI isolates (p = 0.0008). Aggregate analysis of spa types 1 and 2 revealed a strikingly similar pattern, with levels of PSMα1, PSMα2, PSMα3, PSMα4, PSMβ1, and δ-toxin being higher among spa type 1 isolates, and levels of PSM-mec being higher among spa type 2 isolates (p values < 0.0001 for all).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mean Levels of In Vitro Phenol Soluble Modulin Production According to Infection Type of the Source MRSA Isolates. Production of PSM peptides in culture supernatant from infective endocarditis (IE), skin and soft tissue (SSTI), and hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) isolates was quantitated and averaged over two measurements (n = 59 for each clinical group). Differences in average production between groups were calculated using separate Kruskal–Wallis tests for each peptide. Error bars correspond to the SEM. *Indicates lower production among SSTI isolates. **Indicates lower production among HAP isolates. Quantitation of all other peptides was highest among SSTI isolates.

Levels of in vitro PSM production for USA300 isolates

USA300 isolates were associated with significantly higher levels of PSMα1, PSMα2, PSMα3, PSMα4, PSMβ1, PSMβ2, and δ-toxin than non USA300 isolates (p < 0.002 for all) and lower production of PSM-mec than non USA300 isolates (p = 0.0024) (Fig. 3). Even within the SSTI isolates, USA300 isolates exhibited significantly higher mean levels of PSMα2, PSMα3, PSMα4, and δ-toxin (p values < 0.02; data not shown).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mean Levels of In Vitro Phenol Soluble Modulin Production among USA300 Isolates vs All Other Isolates. Average production of PSM peptides in culture supernatant from USA300 MRSA isolates (n = 44) was compared to non-USA300 MRSA isolates (n = 133). Differences in average production between groups were calculated using separate Kruskal–Wallis tests for each peptide. Error bars correspond to the SEM. *Indicates lower production among SSTI isolates. Quantitation of all other peptides was highest among SSTI isolates.

To ensure that the association between SSTI infection and higher PSM levels was not due to confounding introduced by a higher prevalence of USA300 in the SSTI group, we excluded USA300 isolates and repeated the analysis to compare mean levels of in vitro PSM production in the three clinical groups. Even after exclusion of USA300 isolates, SSTI isolates continued to be associated with significantly higher levels of PSMα3, PSMα4, PSMβ1 and δ-toxin and lower production of PSM-mec than IE or HAP isolates (p ≤.05 for all) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mean Levels of In Vitro Phenol Soluble Modulin Production According to Infection Type of the Source MRSA Isolates Excluding USA300. Analysis of average PSM peptide production was repeated for each clinical group after excluding USA300 isolates (IE n = 58; SSTI n = 24; HAP n = 51). Differences in average production between groups were calculated using separate Kruskal–Wallis tests for each peptide. Error bars correspond to the SEM. *Indicates lower production among SSTI isolates. **Indicates lower production among HAP isolates.

Associations with clinical outcome of infection and levels of in vitro PSM production

No significant associations were identified between in vitro PSM levels and clinical outcomes (Supplemental Table 1; data not shown).

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated associations between in vitro PSM production and specific types of infection. Our results were striking: in vitro PSM levels were significantly higher in MRSA isolates obtained from patients with SSTI than MRSA isolates from patients with either HAP or IE. This finding persisted even after USA300 isolates were removed from the analysis. These results provide strong evidence for an association between level of PSM production and the type of infection caused by MRSA, which is of particular interest clinically because intracellular PSM accumulation disrupts S. aureus cellular division and plasma membrane integrity resulting in cell death.44 As such, the targeting of individual PSMs or the PSM transporter Pmt have been proposed as novel avenues for anti-staphylococcal drug development.

The association between PSM production and SSTI is consistent with our understanding of SSTI pathophysiology. In previous studies, PSM subtypes α1-4 and δ-toxin promote the ability of S. aureus to spread across skin,8 reduce microbial competition,7 recruit, activate, and lyse neutrophils,9 and disrupt detection by the adaptive immune system by interfering with dendritic cell function.25 Taken together, these findings provide potential biological plausibility for the higher levels of PSM that we observed in strains of S. aureus causing SSTI.

USA300 isolates in this study exhibited high levels of PSM, a finding that is consistent with previous reports.9,12 USA300 is now the predominant strain of S. aureus in the United States.26 Although USA300 has been described in Europe,27 Asia28 and Australia,29 it remains uncommon in those regions. Using a cohort of isolates from Europe, Australia, and the United States, we show that the relationship between PSM production and SSTI persists in the absence of USA300. This finding suggests that some or all of the currently identified PSM peptides are important components in the pathogenesis of staphylococcal SSTI.

Overall, HAP and IE isolates in this study produced significantly less PSMα1-4 and δ-toxin. Although the role of PSMs in HAP and IE is still largely unknown, one potential explanation involves their role in biofilm homeostasis. Reduced production of PSMs leads to excessive biofilm formation with decreased capacity for systemic dissemination.4 Because biofilm is thought to play a key role in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia30 and IE,31 it is possible that reduced production of PSMs contributes to the pathogenesis of patients with these particular infection types. On the other hand, PSMs are strictly regulated by quorum-sensing32 and serum lipoproteins found in human plasma have been shown to cause this mechanism to fail through ApoB1 sequestration of AIP.33 Furthermore, PSM proteins themselves are neutralized by high low density lipoproteins at physiologic concentrations.34 Thus, the endovascular nature of IE may ultimately reduce the importance of PSMs in the pathogenesis of this type of infection. In general, the role of PSMs in bloodstream infections awaits clarification. While production of a PSMα3 variant with reduced cytolytic and pro-inflammatory potential is linked to more severe hematogenous seeding,35 PSM knockout strains were associated with decreased mortality in a mouse septicemia model.9

Of note, HAP and IE isolates in this study produced significantly higher levels of PSM-mec. In contrast to the other PSM peptides, whose genes are generally found in all S. aureus isolates, this PSM peptide is encoded on SCCmec elements of types II, III, and VIII.36,37 Production of PSM-mec has been associated with increased virulence,36 but it is also embedded in a regulatory RNA whose impact on virulence is opposite to that of the PSM-mec peptide.38 The inverse relationship between the production of PSMα1-4/δ-toxin and PSM-mec in our study is interesting, particularly given its status as the only known PSM contained on a mobile genetic element36 and the reported negative impact that the psm-mec regulatory RNA has on virulence in a murine skin infection model.38 Virtually all S. aureus toxins including PSMs are under the control of the global accessory gene regulator (agr) locus.39 agr is recognized as a quorum-sensing gene cluster that generally up-regulates production of secreted virulence factors and down-regulates production of cell-associated virulence factors in a growth phase dependent manner. Recently, it has been also suggested that agr plays the critical role in cellular metabolism.40 The importance of agr locus has been well established in a variety of animal models of infection.41 Mechanistically, previous studies have demonstrated that the psm-mec RNA influences virulence, at least in part, by inhibiting the translation of agrA, a key positive regulator of all other PSM subtypes.32,38 Thus, high PSM-mec production should result in lower production of other PSMs, although it has been shown that this effect and the overall impact on virulence of the psm-mec locus is highly strain-dependent.37,42 Our results support such an inverse relationship between PSM-mec and other forms of PSMs. Although the regulatory pathways governing PSM production are incompletely understood, it is possible that regulatory mechanisms designed to influence PSM-mec production may contribute to the likelihood that an isolate will cause SSTI or HAP/IE through differential expression of all other PSM subtypes.

The role of PSMβ peptides in the pathogenesis of S. aureus infection is less clear, and the majority of knockout studies to date have shown their absence to have little effect on observed metrics: PSMβ peptides are barely cytolytic,9 and in vitro production of PSMβ peptides in S. aureus is very low in contrast to several other staphylococci such as Staphylococcus epidermidis.43 In our study, levels of PSMβ1 were highest in SSTI isolates while levels of PSMβ2 were significantly lower in HAP isolates. These results suggest that more work remains to be done to define the role of the PSMβ peptides in the pathogenesis of S. aureus infection.

Our study has limitations. First, our comparisons were susceptible to confounding by bacterial genotype, and it is possible that the association we found is due to another factor entirely. To address this, we matched isolates on the basis of geographic origin and repeated our analyses after excluding the primary confounding clone, USA300. The fact that we reached the same conclusions both with and without USA300 isolates in the analysis supports the generalizability of these results. From the opposite perspective, the fact that nearly all of the genotypes found within SSTI are either known to be high PSM producers or had relatively higher production compared to IE/HAP may indicate that increased PSM production is responsible for the skewed genotype distribution we observed. Further studies are necessary to distinguish between these two possibilities. Second, our adjustment for geographic variation was based on the continent of origin, which may be imprecise. Third, PSM levels were quantitated using in vitro assays. Thus, PSM levels produced by these isolates in a clinical infection may differ. Fourth, our analysis was limited to MRSA; current studies in methicillin susceptible S. aureus isolates are planned. Finally, our results only identify an association between in vitro PSM levels and clinical infection type. The biological basis of this finding needs to be established in vivo.

Despite these limitations, however, our study demonstrates that MRSA isolates from patients with SSTI produce significantly higher levels of PSM in vitro than geographically matched MRSA isolates from patients with either HAP or IE, even when USA300 was excluded from the analysis. This association may represent a fundamental role for PSMs in the pathogenesis of SSTI that is not present in other types of infection caused by MRSA. Further in vivo studies using SSTI models from globally diverse clonal backgrounds involving PSM knockout models are necessary to establish the importance of PSMs in the initial pathogenesis of infections caused by S. aureus.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Table 1

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of 59 patients with MRSA hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Parameter Value (n)
Demographic characteristics
 Mean age (yr) SD 65.4 ± 19.3
 Male sex 61.0% (36)
Geographical location
 North America 62.7% (37)
 Europe 27.1% (16)
 Australia 10.2% (6)
MRSA risk factors
 Hospitalization in previous 6 months 61.0% (36)
 Antibiotic treatment within previous 3 months 50.9% (30)
 Chronic illness 84.8% (50)
 Prior MRSA infection 13.6% (8)
 Admission from nursing home 35.6% (21)
 Surgical procedure during current stay 18.6% (11)
 Residence in area of MRSA endemicitiy 35.6% (21)
Smoking status
 Current smoker 22.0% (13)
 Ex-smoker 40.7% (24)
 Nonsmoker 35.6% (21)
 Not recorded 1.7% (1)
Mean body mass index ± SD (kg/m2)
On hemodialysis 3.4% (2)
In acute renal failure 6.8% (4)
Immunocompromised/severe organ dysfunction 6.8% (4)
Cardiac comorbidities 67.8% (40)
Operative status
 Nonoperative 81.4% (48)
 Emergency post-operative 17.0% (10)
 Elective post-operative 1.7% (1)
On ventilator support at randomization 32.2% (19)
In the ICU at baseline 49.2% (29)
Mean total APACHE II score ± SD 15.8 ± 6.0
Baseline S.aureus bacteremia 15.3% (9)
Outcomes at 28 days
 Alive or censored 71.2% (42)
 Deceased 28.9% (17)

Key point.

  • In vitro production of most phenol soluble modulin proteins is significantly higher among MRSA isolates obtained from skin and soft tissue infection when compared to MRSA isolates obtained from patients with hospital acquired pneumonia or infective endocarditis.

Acknowledgments

Funding: This work was supported by the Infectious Disease Society of America’s Medical Scholars Program [to NRB], grants provided by the National Institute of Health [R01-AI068804 and K24-AI093969 to VGF], and the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [to MO].

ICE Micro Investigator Index 2012: Australia: Eugene Athan MD, Owen Harris MBBS (Barwon Health); Tony M. Korman, MD (Monash Medical Centre), Despina Kotsanas, BS (Southern Health); Phillip Jones MD, Porl Reinbott, Suzanne Ryan, MHS (The University of New South Wales); Brazil: Claudio Querido Fortes, MD (Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho/UFRJ); Chile: Patricia Garcia, MD, Sandra Braun Jones, MD (Hosp. Clínico Pont. Universidad Católicade Chile); Croatia Bruno Barsic, MD, PhD, Suzana Bukovski, MD (Univ. Hospital for Infectious Diseases); France: Christine Selton-Suty, MD, Neijla Aissa, MD, Thanh Doco-Lecompte, MD (CHU Nancy-Brabois); Francois Delahaye, MD, PhD, Francois Vandenesch, MD (Hopital Louis Pradel); Pierre Tattevin, MD, PhD (Pontchaillou University); Bruno Hoen, MD, PhD, Patrick Plesiat, MD (University Medical Center of Besançon); Greece: Helen Giamarellou MD PhD, Efthymia Giannitsioti, MD, Ekaterini Tarpatzi, MD (Attikon University General Hospital); Italy: Marie Françoise Tripodi, MD, (Università degli Studi di Salerno), Emanuele Durante-Mangoni, MD, PhD, Riccardo Utili MD, PhD, Roberta Casillo, MD, PhD, Susanna Cuccurullo, MSc (II Università di Napoli), Pierre Yves Donnio, PhD, Annibale Raglio, MD, Fredy Suter, MD (Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo); Lebanon: Tania Baban, MD, Zeina Kanafani, MD, MS, Souha S.Kanj, MD, Jad Sfeir, MD, Mohamad Yasmine, MD (American University of Beirut Medical Center); New Zealand: Arthur Morris, MD (Diagnostic Medlab), David R. Murdoch, MD MSc, DTM&H (University of Otago); Slovienia: Manica Mueller Premru, MD, PhD, Tatjana Lejko-Zupanc, MD, PhD (Medical Center Ljubljana); Spain: Manuel Almela, MD, Yolanda Armero, MD, Manuel Azqueta, MD, Ximena Castañeda, MD, Carlos Cervera, MD, Carlos Falces, MD, Cristina Garcia-de- la- Maria, PhD, Jose M. Gatell, MD, PhD, Jaume Llopis, MD, PhD, Francesc Marco, MD, PhD, Carlos A. Mestres, MD, PhD, José M. Miró, MD, PhD, Asuncion Moreno, MD, PhD, Salvador Ninot, MD, Carlos Paré, MD, PhD, Juan M Pericas, MD, Eduard Quintana, MD, Jose Ramirez, MD, PhD, Marta Sitges, MD (Hospital ClinicIDIBAPS. University of Barcelona), Emilio Bouza, MD, PhD, Marta Rodríguez-Créixems, MD PhD, Victor Ramallo, MD, (Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón); USA: Suzanne Bradley, MD (Ann Arbor VA Medical Center); Dannah Wray, MD, Lisa Steed, PhD, MHS, Robert Cantey, MD, (Medical University of South Carolina); Gail Peterson MD, Amy Stancoven, MD (UT-Southwestern Medical Center); Christopher Woods, MD, MPH, G. Ralph Corey, MD, L. Barth Reller, MD, Vance G. Fowler Jr., MD, MHS, Vivian H Chu, MD, MHS, (Duke University Medical Center).

ICE Coordinating Center: Khaula Baloch, MPH, Vivian H. Chu, MD, MHS, G. Ralph Corey, MD, Christy C. Dixon, Vance G. Fowler, Jr., MD, MHS, Tina Harding, RN, BSN, Marian Jones-Richmond, Paul Pappas, MS, Lawrence P. Park, PhD, Thomas Redick, MPH, Judy Stafford, MS.

ICE Publications Committee: Kevin Anstrom, PhD, Eugene Athan, MD, Arnold S. Bayer, MD, Christopher H. Cabell, MD, MHS, Vivian H. Chu, MD, MHS, G. Ralph Corey, MD, Vance G. Fowler, Jr., MD, MHS, Bruno Hoen, MD, PhD, A.W. Karchmer, MD, José M. Miró, MD, PhD, David R. Murdoch, MD, MSc, DTM&H, Daniel J. Sexton MD, Andrew Wang, MD.

ICE Steering Committee: Arnold S. Bayer, MD, Christopher H Cabell, MD, MHS, Vivian Chu MD, MHS, G. Ralph Corey, MD, David T. Durack, MD, D Phil, Susannah Eykyn, MD, Vance G. Fowler, Jr., MD, MHS, Bruno Hoen, MD, PhD, José M. Miró, MD, PhD, Phillipe Moreillon, MD, PhD, Lars Olaison, MD, PhD, Didier Raoult, MD, PhD, Ethan Rubinstein MD, LLB, Daniel J, Sexton, MD.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2015.06.005.

Footnotes

Conferences where the work was presented

Abstract and Poster presentation: 46th Annual Alpha Omega Alpha Research Symposium in Durham, NC August 2014.

Abstract and Slide Presentation: Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Annual Conference in Washington, DC September 2014.

Conflicts of interest

Mr. Berlon reports grants from IDSA Medical Scholars Program, grants from Duke Travel Grant, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Woods reports other from bio-Merieux, non-financial support and other from Becton Dickinson, grants from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr. Otto reports grants from NIAID, during the conduct of the study; in addition, Dr. Otto has a patent 8,211,445 issued. Dr. Fowler reports grants from National Institutes of Health (K24-AI093969 and R01-AI068804), during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Board Membership Merck, personal fees from Consultancy from Pfizer, Novartis, Galderma, Novadigm, Durata, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, Medicines Co., Cerexa, Tetraphase, Trius, MedImmune, Bayer, Theravance, Cubist, Basilea, Affinergy; personal fees from Duke University Medical Center, grants from Institutional Grants/grants pending NIH, MedImmune, Forest/Cerexa, Pfizer, Merck, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, and Cubist, personal fees from Royalties (UpTo-Date), personal fees from Payment for development of educational presentations (Green Cross, Cubist, Cerexa, Durata, Theravance), outside the submitted work; In addition, Dr. Fowler has a patent NCGR pending.

References

  • 1.Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miro JM, Fowler VG, Jr, Bayer AS, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Archives Intern Med. 2009;169(5):463–73. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Doern GV, Jones RN, Pfaller MA, Kugler KC, Beach ML. Bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 1997). SENTRY Study Group (North America) Diagnostic Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;34(1):65–72. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(98)00162-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weber DJ, Rutala WA, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Samsa GP, Brown V, Niederman MS. Microbiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia compared with that of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28(7):825–31. doi: 10.1086/518460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Periasamy S, Joo HS, Duong AC, Bach TH, Tan VY, Chatterjee SS, et al. How Staphylococcus aureus biofilms develop their characteristic structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(4):1281–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115006109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Otto M. Phenol-soluble modulins. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014;304(2):164–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cheung GY, Joo HS, Chatterjee SS, Otto M. Phenol-soluble modulins – critical determinants of staphylococcal virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014 Jul;38(4):698–719. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Joo HS, Cheung GY, Otto M. Antimicrobial activity of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is caused by phenol-soluble modulin derivatives. J Biological Chem. 2011;286(11):8933–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.221382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tsompanidou E, Denham EL, Becher D, de Jong A, Buist G, van Oosten M, et al. Distinct roles of phenol-soluble modulins in spreading of Staphylococcus aureus on wet surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(3):886–95. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03157-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang R, Braughton KR, Kretschmer D, Bach TH, Queck SY, Li M, et al. Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA. Nat Med. 2007;13(12):1510–4. doi: 10.1038/nm1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kobayashi SD, Malachowa N, Whitney AR, Braughton KR, Gardner DJ, Long D, et al. Comparative analysis of USA300 virulence determinants in a rabbit model of skin and soft tissue infection. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(6):937–41. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, et al. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(7):666–74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li M, Diep BA, Villaruz AE, Braughton KR, Jiang X, DeLeo FR, et al. Evolution of virulence in epidemic community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(14):5883–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900743106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stryjewski ME, Graham DR, Wilson SE, O’Riordan W, Young D, Lentnek A, et al. Telavancin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections caused by gram-positive organisms. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(11):1683–93. doi: 10.1086/587896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bae IG, Tonthat GT, Stryjewski ME, Rude TH, Reilly LF, Barriere SL, et al. Presence of genes encoding the panton-valentine leukocidin exotoxin is not the primary determinant of outcome in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: results of a multinational trial. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(12):3952–7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01643-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rubinstein E, Lalani T, Corey GR, Kanafani ZA, Nannini EC, Rocha MG, et al. Telavancin versus vancomycin for hospital-acquired pneumonia due to gram-positive pathogens. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(1):31–40. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bae IG, Federspiel JJ, Miro JM, Woods CW, Park L, Rybak MJ, et al. Heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate susceptibility phenotype in bloodstream methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from an international cohort of patients with infective endocarditis: prevalence, genotype, and clinical significance. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(9):1355–66. doi: 10.1086/606027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fowler VG, Jr, Miro JM, Hoen B, Cabell CH, Abrutyn E, Rubinstein E, et al. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress. JAMA. 2005;293(24):3012–21. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.24.3012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler VG, Jr, Ryan T, et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(4):633–8. doi: 10.1086/313753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McDougal LK, Steward CD, Killgore GE, Chaitram JM, McAllister SK, Tenover FC. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(11):5113–20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5113-5120.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mathema B, Mediavilla J, Kreiswirth BN. Sequence analysis of the variable number tandem repeat in Staphylococcus aureus protein A gene: spa typing. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;431:285–305. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-032-8_22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM. Novel multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous identification of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains USA300 and USA400 and detection of mecA and Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes, with discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(3):1118–22. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01309-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lina G, Piemont Y, Godail-Gamot F, Bes M, Peter MO, Gauduchon V, et al. Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29(5):1128–32. doi: 10.1086/313461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang K, Sparling J, Chow BL, Elsayed S, Hussain Z, Church DL, et al. New quadriplex PCR assay for detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance and simultaneous discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(11):4947–55. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4947-4955.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Campbell SJ, Deshmukh HS, Nelson CL, Bae IG, Stryjewski ME, Federspiel JJ, et al. Genotypic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a multinational trial of complicated skin and skin structure infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(2):678–84. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01822-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schreiner J, Kretschmer D, Klenk J, Otto M, Bühring HJ, Stevanovic S, et al. Staphylococcus aureus phenol-soluble modulin peptides modulate dendritic cell functions and increase in vitro priming of regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2013;190(7):3417–26. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Diekema DJ, Richter SS, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, Riahi F, Tendolkar S, et al. Continued emergence of USA300 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States: results from a nationwide surveillance study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(3):285–92. doi: 10.1086/675283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rolo J, Miragaia M, Turlej-Rogacka A, Empel J, Bouchami O, Faria NA, et al. High genetic diversity among community-associated Staphylococcus aureus in Europe: results from a multicenter study. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chuang YY, Huang YC. Molecular epidemiology of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Asia. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(8):698–708. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70136-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chua KY, Seemann T, Harrison PF, Monagle S, Korman TM, Johnson PD, et al. The dominant Australian community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone ST93-IV [2B] is highly virulent and genetically distinct. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vandecandelaere I, Matthijs N, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Deforce D, Vosters P, De Bus L, et al. Assessment of microbial diversity in biofilms recovered from endotracheal tubes using culture dependent and independent approaches. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.LaPlante KL, Woodmansee S. Activities of daptomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin and gentamicin against biofilm-forming methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an experimental model of endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(9):3880–6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00134-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Queck SY, Jameson-Lee M, Villaruz AE, Bach TH, Khan BA, Sturdevant DE, et al. RNAIII-independent target gene control by the agr quorum-sensing system: insight into the evolution of virulence regulation in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Cell. 2008;32(1):150–8. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Peterson MM, Mack JL, Hall PR, Alsup AA, Alexander SM, Sully EK, et al. Apolipoprotein B Is an innate barrier against invasive Staphylococcus aureus infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;4(6):555–66. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Surewaard BG, Nijland R, Spaan AN, Kruijtzer JA, de Haas CJ, van Strijp JA. Inactivation of staphylococcal phenol soluble modulins by serum lipoprotein particles. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(3):e1002606. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cheung GY, Kretschmer D, Duong AC, Yeh AJ, Ho TV, Chen Y, et al. Production of an attenuated phenol-soluble modulin variant unique to the MRSA clonal complex 30 increases severity of bloodstream infection. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(8):e1004298. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Queck SY, Khan BA, Wang R, Bach TH, Kretschmer D, Chen L, et al. Mobile genetic element-encoded cytolysin connects virulence to methicillin resistance in MRSA. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(7):e1000533. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chatterjee SS, Chen L, Joo HS, Cheung GY, Kreiswirth BN, Otto M. Distribution and regulation of the mobile genetic element-encoded phenol-soluble modulin PSM-mec in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kaito C, Saito Y, Ikuo M, Omae Y, Mao H, Nagano G, et al. Mobile genetic element SCCmec-encoded psm-mec RNA suppresses translation of agrA and attenuates MRSA virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(4):e1003269. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cheung GY, Wang R, Khan BA, Sturdevant DE, Otto M. Role of the accessory gene regulator agr in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis. Infect Immun. 2011;79(5):1927–35. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00046-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC, Jr, Novick RP, Venkataraman L, Wennersten C, et al. Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) group II: is there a relationship to the development of intermediate-level glycopeptide resistance? J Infect Dis. 2003;187(6):929–38. doi: 10.1086/368128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Rude TH, Fowler VG., Jr Pulse field gel electrophoresis. Methods Mol Biol. 2015 doi: 10.1007/7651_2014_191. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cheung GY, Villaruz AE, Joo HS, Duong AC, Yeh AJ, Nguyen TH, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the regulatory function mediated by the small regulatory psm-mec RNA of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014;304(5–6):637–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cheung GY, Rigby K, Wang R, Queck SY, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis strategies to avoid killing by human neutrophils. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(10):e1001133. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chatterjee SS, Joo HS, Duong AC, Dieringer TD, Tan VY, Song Y, et al. Essential Staphylococcus aureus toxin export system. Nat Med. 2013;19(3):364–7. doi: 10.1038/nm.3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Table 1

RESOURCES