Skip to main content
PhytoKeys logoLink to PhytoKeys
. 2016 Feb 25;(61):27–35. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.61.7420

Liparis aphylla (Malaxideae, Orchidaceae), a new leafless record from Peru

Alexander Damian 1, Paul Ormerod 2
PMCID: PMC4816979  PMID: 27081347

Abstract Abstract

Liparis aphylla G.A.Romero & Garay was previously known only from two herbarium specimens collected in 1945 and 1977 in Ecuador and Colombia, respectively. This little-known species is hereby reported for the first time for Peru. An updated description, line illustration, color photographs and distribution map of Liparis aphylla, as well as an identification key to the Peruvian species of Liparis are provided.

Keywords: Orchidaceae, Liparis aphylla, Cajamarca, Peru, Liparis section Aphylla

Palabras clave: Orchidaceae, Liparis aphylla, Cajamarca, Peru, Liparis section Aphylla

Introduction

Liparis Rich. s.l. is a large cosmopolitan genus of about 480 species, reported in tropical Asia, Malesia, eastern Australia, the Pacific Islands (including Hawaii and Tahiti), Madagascar, Africa, subtropical and tropical Americas, temperate Europe, Asia and North America. The genus is composed of both terrestrial and epiphytic species; with small to prominent pseudobulbs; one to several (rarely none) conduplicate to plicate leaves, a terminal inflorescence of one to many; flowers usually resupinate, small or medium-sized, yellow, green, orange, or purple; the sepals are similar, although the lateral ones are often wider and shorter than the dorsal one; the labellum is firmly attached to a footless, often arched column; the incumbent anther bears four pollinia grouped in two pairs, and lacking caudicles or stipe but with minute viscidium. According to a recent molecular phylogenetic study (Cameron 2005), Liparis contains four major clades, two of which include primarily Asiatic-Malesian epiphytic taxa with narrow conduplicate leaves, and the other two consist mostly of terrestrial plants with worldwide distribution and broader, conduplicate to plicate leaves. However, further studies are needed to better understand its evolutionary history and to clarify its delimitation and position within the tribe Malaxideae.

Schlechter (1921), compiled the first account of Liparis in Peru and reported three species, namely Liparis crispifolia Rchb.f, Liparis elegantula Kraenzl, and Liparis ramosa Poepp. & Endl. Later, Schweinfurth (1959) listed eight species, adding Liparis elata Lindl. [= Liparis nervosa (Thunb. ex A. Murray) Lindl.], Liparis laticuneata C. Schweinf., Liparis retusa Fawc. & Rendle, and Liparis vexillifera (Lex.) Cogn. Bracko & Zarucchi (1993) added two unvouchered records, namely Liparis luerii Dodson [= Liparis serpens Garay] and Liparis neuroglossa Rchb.f. to the list of Peruvian taxa (see Ormerod 2012). As far as we know, Liparis neuroglossa is only known from the Bolivian type collection. Taking into account the previous records and four additional Peruvian species described by Ormerod (2012), currently we recognize the following 11 species for this country: Liparis ecallosa Ormerod, Liparis elegantula, Liparis laticuneata, Liparis nervosa, Liparis ramosa, Liparis retusa, Liparis rusbyi Rolfe, Liparis schunkei Ormerod, Liparis serratiloba Ormerod, Liparis vargasii Ormerod, and Liparis vexillifera.

During field exploration conducted by the senior author in the montane rainforest of Cajamarca, Peru, in 2014, a small terrestrial individual plant of Liparis was collected and subsequently identified as Liparis aphylla. Because of the scarcity of information about this rare orchid, we provide an updated description and line illustration, we illustrate it with color photos for the first time and we provide additional information regarding its ecology and morphological variation.

Materials and methods

A live plant of Liparis aphylla was collected in May 2014 in Cajamarca, Peru (see detailed locality data under “Additional specimen examined” below). Specimen identification was made by comparing the plant with the original publication of the species in Garay and Romero (1999). A herbarium specimen was prepared, and two flowers were preserved in a solution consisting of 70% ethanol, 20% water, and 10% glycerol. An updated description was prepared based on all collections of Liparis aphylla available (either physical specimens or digital images).

Taxonomy

Liparis aphylla

G.A.Romero & Garay

Figs 1 , 2

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Liparis aphylla. A Habit B Flower C Dissected perianth D Detail of the labellum disk base E Column withouh the anter cap, ventral view F Column lateral view, and anther cap. Drawn from A. Damian 0100 (MOL!).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Liparis aphylla, A Habit B–C Two views of the of labellum. Arrows show the distinct elliptical concavity of the callus. Photographer: A. L. Damian.

  • Liparis aphylla G.A.Romero & Garay. Harvard Pap. Bot. 4(2): 483. 1999.

Type.

COLOMBIA. Boyacá: Sierra del Cocuy, 2800 m, “terrestre, entre musgos asociada con Masdevallia sp., aparentemente saprófita; tépalos blanco-verdosos, labelo púrpura lila” 20 July 1997, M. Ospina Hernández 1487 (Holotype: AMES!).

Description.

Herb, 4–10 cm tall, terrestrial. Rhizome and roots not seen. Pseudobulb subglobose, 2.5–5 × 2 mm, enveloped by a basal foliaceous green sheath 1.5 cm long. Leaves not seen. Inflorescence racemose, erect, successively (up to 6) flowered (usually two are open at a time), 7.8 cm. long; peduncle slender, 4 cm long; rachis weakly flexuous, distichous, 3.8 cm long; floral bracts lanceolate. acute, green, 5–7 × 3 mm. Flowers widely opening, resupinate, fragrance not detected, sepals and petals greenish, labellum rosy brown with a darker median stripe, column greenish suffused with rosy brown, pollinia yellow. Green, 4-6 long ovary with clavate, narrowly winged pedicel. Dorsal sepal oblong-lanceolate, obtuse, erect, 1–veined, 3–5.5 × 0.9–1.5 mm. Lateral sepals obliquely oblong-ovate, obtuse, midvein low carinate, parallell to each other under the labellum, 1-veined, 3–5 × 0.6–2 mm. Petals linear, obtuse, reflexed, 1–veined, 2.6–5 × 0.5–0.6 mm. Labellum subquadrate, distal margin serrate-denticulate, medially with a thickened glossy stripe, 3–5 × 3.5–5 mm; callus bilobed, each side with an erect, subquadrate lobe between which there is a distally thick-walled elliptical cavity. Column semiterete, thick basally but slender above, arcuate on its distal half, apex with small triangular wings on each side, 3 mm long; pollinia four in two pairs, waxy, triangular; anther cap ovoid. Capsule and seeds not seen.

Ecology and distribution.

Liparis aphylla is found in the Andes of Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, within an elevation range of 2600–3300 m. The distribution of this species, based on herbarium records, appears to be highly disjunct (Figure 3). However, this extreme patchiness may be an artifact of limited collecting, and we suspect that Liparis aphylla likely occurs throughout the Andean range, at climatically suitable locations ranging from the Cordillera Oriental/East Andes in Colombia to the northern Andes of Peru. Plants of Liparis aphylla grow terrestrially among loose moss in wet, cold montane cloud forest with abundant bryophytes. Flowering period: May–July.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Known distribution of Liparis aphylla.

Additional specimens examined.

ECUADOR. Prov. Azuay: East Cordillera, 4–6 km N. of Sevilla de Oro, 2745–3050 m, 16 August 1945, W.H. Camp E-4774 (AMES!, NY); PERU. Departamento Cajamarca, provincia Chota, Querocoto, entrance road to “La Granja”, 6°20'6.70"S, 79°9'24.49"W; terrestrial, montane rainforest, 2600 m, 01 May 2014, A. Damian 0100 (MOL!, ADP-spirit 3033).

Conservation status.

This species is presently know only from three location worldwide; according to the IUCN Red List (IUCN 2014) and Roque and Leon (2006) criteria, it should be listed as (CR) B1ab(iii).

Discussion.

Liparis aphylla was described from an individual plant collected in Sierra del Cocuy, Colombia, by Romero and Garay (1997) and from another record from Azuay, Ecuador, (1977). These two specimens, along with the Peruvian specimen reported in this paper, represent the only available material of this tiny rare orchid. The overall morphology observed in these three specimens, is quite uniform except for considerable variation in labellum shape, which ranges from quadrate in the specimen Camp E-4774 to subquadrate in Ospina Hernández 1487. Moreover, the elliptic concavity of the callus of our specimen did not appear to be present in other two specimens, although it is not clear if the absence of this concavity in the latter two specimens is an artifact of preservation.

Unlike any others members of Liparis, Liparis aphylla appears as a leafless orchid with poor-developed root system. However, these two conditions need to be studied carefully. Although we were unable to see any remnant roots or rhizome on the specimens examined, Ospina Hernandez sheet (1487) includes an interesting note cited as “Plant tubers covered by fungal hyphae (...)”. It is highly possible that “tubers” on this context actually refers to the pseudobulb and not to the presence of subterranean stems or shoots that resemble any kind of root-like system or rhizome as it occurs in many basal Epidendroids orchids (Pridgeon et al. 2005, Campbell 2014). A closest analysis of the original drawing of Liparis aphylla by Romero and Garay (1997) shows sort of filamentous structures emerging beneath the pseudobulb. Since the dimensions of these formations are indistinct (0.3 × 0.1 cm), is fairly accurate to attribute those filamentouse root-like structures to the “fungal hyphae” which Ospina was referring in the first place.

Another strikingly feature on Liparis aphylla is its leaflessness. As it happens with rhizome and roots, no remnants of withered or decomposed leaves were observed neither in the field nor in available herbarium specimens. As a result of this uncommon state within Liparis, Romero & Garay decided to establish Sect. Aphylla (Romero and Garay 1997) to include this single species, which outstands essentially for its leafless habit, well-developed pseudobulb, plants of small size and muscicolous habitat. However, additional observations whether this set of characters, especially those referring to leaves and roots, are continuous or not along specimens were missing.

Leaflessness is a feature that is present in many angiosperms (Vicent et al. 2013, Calswards et al. 2006) and Orchidaceae is not the exception. At least 235 orchid species and 43 genera are leafless, most of them found in Epidendroideae (Freudenstein and Barrett 2010). For instance, within tribe Malaxideae, two orchids have reported being leafless: Malaxis aphylla (King & Pantl.) T.Tang & F.T.Wang and Malaxis saprophyta (King & Pantl.) T.Tang & F.T.Wang (Vincent et al. 2013). Most of these leafless orchid display any of the following arrangements or life-forms: (1) well-developed shoot system which forms the main body (e.g. leafless Vanilla), (2) shoot system reduced, i.e. shootless orchids, roots forming the main body of the plant (e.g. Vandeae) (Carlsward et al. 2006), (3) roots fleshy, fasciculate, leaves basal but lacking at flowering time (e.g. Spiranthinae: Cranichideae) (Salazar 2003), and (4) myco-heterotrophic orchids, achlorophyllous, roots reduced or absent, rhizome fleshy, coralloid, tuberlike or cylindric (e.g. Aphyllorchis, Gastrodia) (Rasmussen 2000). A major question rise then among others, which life-form represents better to Liparis aphylla?. Although Romero and Garay (1997) suggested it could be referred to as a “saprophyte”, this term proved to be inaccurate (Leake 1994). We believed Liparis aphylla could represent a partially myco-heterotrophic (holo-mycotrophic) plant, i.e. clorophyllous plant that combines autotrophy and myco-heterotrophy to obtain carbon during at least one stage of its life cycle (Rasmussen 1995). The nonexistence of a well-developed root system, leaflessness (= myco-heterotrophic species) and retainment of chlorophyll on its basal sheath, stem and bracts seem to confirm this hypothesis. Nonetheless, it is important to keep in mind that the myco-heterotrophic status is “putative” on this species, and remains speculative until a careful physiological analysis has been carried out.

Identification key to Peruvian species of Liparis

1 Leaves absent Liparis aphylla
– Leaves present at flowering 2
2 Plants not decumbent; pseudobulbs or pseudobulb-like basal thickening present 3
– Plants decumbent, pseudobulbs absent 4
3 Leaf solitary, basal or near the base Liparis vexillifera
– Leaves several, spreading, basal or near the base Liparis nervosa
4 Leaves appearing singly on rhizome 5
– Leaves appearing in pairs on rhizome or subapproximate on erect stem 6
5 Labellum subquadrate, ca. 7.5 mm wide Liparis retusa
– Labellum papilioforme, ca. 10.2 mm wide Liparis vargasii
6 Labellum reniform Liparis serratiloba
– Labellum cuneate to pandurate or obovate 7
7 Labellum cuneate 8
– Labellum elliptic, pandurate to obovate 9
8 Labellum disc with central thickened band Liparis laticuneata
– Labellum disc with minute bilobed forcipate callus Liparis elegantula
9 Labellum lacking basal callus Liparis ecallosa
– Labellum with basal callus 10
10 Labellum elliptic-pandurate or narrowly obovate, to 6mm wide; basal callus V-shaped (edges apically convergent) Liparis schunkei
– Labellum suborbicular to broadly obovate, 9-12 mm wide; basal callus not V-shaped (edges parallel) Liparis rusbyi

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Liparis aphylla

Acknowledgments

We thank the herbarium and library staff at the Harvard University Herbaria (A, AMES, GH) for their help and hospitality; John Li Flores for his assistance with the distribution map; Brad Boyle, Camila Crifó and Nicole Mitidieri for his valuable observations; Gustavo Romero for assisting with literature, and to the reviewers for their valuable recommendations on the manuscript.

Citation

Damian A, Ormerod P (2016) Liparis aphylla (Malaxideae, Orchidaceae), a new leafless record from Peru. PhytoKeys 61: 27–35. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.61.7420

References

  1. Brako L, Zarucchi JL. (1993) Catalogue of the flowering plants and Gymnosperms of Peru. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 45: 1–1286. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron KM. (2005) Leave it to the leaves: A molecular phylogenetic study of Malaxideae (Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae). American J. Bot. 92(6): 1025–1032. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.6.1025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell FK. (2014) A summary of Holomycotrophic orchids. The MIOS Journal 15(4): 6–17. [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlsward BS, Whitten WM, Williams NH, Bytebier B. (2006) Molecular Phylogenetics of Vandeae (Orchidaceae) and the evolution of leaflessness. Am. J. Bot. 93: 770–786. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5209-6_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Freudenstein JV, Barrett CF. (2010) Mycoheterotrophy and diversity in Orchidaceae. In: Seberg O, Petersen G, Barfod AS, Davis JI. (Eds) Diversity, phylogeny, and evolution in the monocotyledons. Aarhus University Press, Arhus, 25–37. [Google Scholar]
  6. Garay LA, Romero-González GA. (1999) Schedulae Orchidum II. Harvard Pap. Bot. 4(2): 475–488. [Google Scholar]
  7. IUCN (2014) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 8.1 Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee; in March 2014. [Google Scholar]
  8. Leake JR. (1994) The biology of Myco-heterotrophic (‘saprophytic’) plants. New Phytologist 127: 171–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04272.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ormerod P. (2012) Notes on Liparis Section Ramosae (Orchidaceae: Malaxideae). Harvard Papers in Botany 17(1): 169–177. doi: 10.3100/025.017.0118 [Google Scholar]
  10. Pridgeon A, Cribb PJ, Chase MW, Rasmussen FN. (2005) Genera Orchidacearum, volume 4: Epidendroideae (Part One). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1–608. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rasmussen FN. (2000) Ins and Outs of Orchid Phylogeny. In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA. (Eds) Monocots: Systematics and Evolution. CSIRO Melbourne, 430–435.
  12. Rasmussen HN. (1995) Terrestrial Orchids: From Seeds to Myco-trophic Plant. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–448. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511525452 [Google Scholar]
  13. Roque J, Leon B. (2006) Orchidaceae endemicas del Peru. In: Leon B, Pitman N, Roque J. (Eds) El libro rojo de las plantas endemicas el Peru. Rev. peru. biol. Numero especial 13(2): 759–878.
  14. Salazar GA. (2003) Spiranthinae. In: Pridgeon AM, Cribb PJ, Chase MW, Rasmussen FN. (Eds) Genera orchidacearum 3: orchidoideae part 2, Vanilloideae. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 164−278. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schlechter R. (1921) Die Orchideenflora der suderamikanischen Kordillerenstaaten IV. Peru. Rep. Sp. Nov. Regni Veg., Beih. 9: 1–182. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schweinfurth C. (1959) Orchids of Peru. Fieldiana, Bot. 30(2): 373–38. [Google Scholar]
  17. Vincent SFT, Frendenstein JV, Kissling J, Christenhusz JM, Stotler ER, Crandal-Stotler B, Wickett N, Rudall JP, Maas-van de Kamer H, Maas JM. (2013) Taxonomy and Classification. In: Vincent SFT. (Ed.) Mycoheterotrophy: The Biology of Plants Living on Fungi. Springer Science+Business Media New York, 19–101. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Liparis aphylla

Articles from PhytoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES