Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2016 Feb 9;291(14):7774–7785. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.715110

Organophosphate Hydrolase Is a Lipoprotein and Interacts with Pi-specific Transport System to Facilitate Growth of Brevundimonas diminuta Using OP Insecticide as Source of Phosphate*

Sunil Parthasarathy ‡,1, Hari Parapatla , Aparna Nandavaram , Tracy Palmer §, Dayananda Siddavattam ‡,2
PMCID: PMC4817201  PMID: 26861877

Abstract

Organophosphate hydrolase (OPH), encoded by the organophosphate degradation (opd) island, hydrolyzes the triester bond found in a variety of organophosphate insecticides and nerve agents. OPH is targeted to the inner membrane of Brevundimonas diminuta in a pre-folded conformation by the twin arginine transport (Tat) pathway. The OPH signal peptide contains an invariant cysteine residue at the junction of the signal peptidase (Spase) cleavage site along with a well conserved lipobox motif. Treatment of cells producing native OPH with the signal peptidase II inhibitor globomycin resulted in accumulation of most of the pre-OPH in the cytoplasm with negligible processed OPH detected in the membrane. Substitution of the conserved lipobox cysteine to serine resulted in release of OPH into the periplasm, confirming that OPH is a lipoprotein. Analysis of purified OPH revealed that it was modified with the fatty acids palmitate and stearate. Membrane-bound OPH was shown to interact with the outer membrane efflux protein TolC and with PstS, the periplasmic component of the ABC transporter complex (PstSACB) involved in phosphate transport. Interaction of OPH with PstS appears to facilitate transport of Pi generated from organophosphates due to the combined action of OPH and periplasmically located phosphatases. Consistent with this model, opd null mutants of B. diminuta failed to grow using the organophosphate insecticide methyl parathion as sole source of phosphate.

Keywords: biodegradation, lipoprotein secretion, multidrug transporter, protein complex, protein-protein interaction

Introduction

Membrane-associated organophosphate hydrolase (OPH)3 hydrolyzes the triester bond found in a variety of organophosphate insecticides and nerve agents (1, 2). The 39-kDa monomer requires Zn+ ions as cofactor (3). OPH is encoded by the opd (organophosphate degrading) gene found on dissimilar plasmids and the opd gene has recently been shown to be a part of an integrative mobilizable element (IME) (4). Due to the mobile nature of the opd island, identical opd genes are found among bacterial strains isolated from different geographical regions (4, 5). Although its physiological substrate is unknown, OPH hydrolyzes paraoxon at a rate approaching the diffusion limit (kcat/Km 108 m−1 s−1) (6). Considering its catalytic efficiency and broad substrate range, it has been assumed that OPH has evolved to degrade organophosphate (OP) insecticides accumulated in agricultural soils (7). Structural analysis shows that OPH contains a TIM barrel-fold as seen in most of the members of amidohydrolase superfamily proteins (8).

OPH associates with cell membranes and membrane-associated OPH has been purified from a number of sources (3, 913). Analysis of the amino acid sequences of OPH proteins indicates that all of them contain a predicted signal peptide harboring a well defined twin-arginine (Tat) motif. Twin-arginine signal peptides serve to target proteins to the twin-arginine protein transport (Tat) pathway, which translocates folded proteins across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane (14). Proteinase K treatment confirmed that OPH is exported to the periplasmic side of the inner membrane in Brevundimonas diminuta and dependence on the Tat pathway was demonstrated because substitution of the invariant arginine residues of the Tat signal peptide affected both processing and localization of OPH (15). However, the mechanism by which OPH is anchored to the inner membrane and the physiological role of OPH are currently unclear. In this report we demonstrate that OPH is a lipoprotein and that it plays an essential role in the acquisition of phosphate from OP insecticides.

Experimental Procedures

Media, Strains, and Plasmids

Strains and plasmids used in the present work are shown in Table 1. Primers used for PCR amplification and site-directed mutagenesis are listed in Table 2. B. diminuta cultures were grown either in LB medium or in HEPES minimal medium. HEPES minimal medium was prepared by dissolving 0.2 g of KCl, 0.2 g of MgSO4·7H20, 40 mg of CaNO3·4H2O, 80 mg of (NH4)2HPO4, and 1 mg of Fe2SO4 in 1 liter of 50 mm HEPES, pH 7.4. The medium also contained an essential amino acid mixture (0.07 mm), pantothenate (0.5 mg), vitamin B-12 (0.001 mg), and biotin (0.001 mg) along with sodium acetate (2%) as carbon source. The (NH4)2HPO4 was omitted when methyl parathion (0.6 mm) was used as sole phosphate source. When required, polymyxin (10 μg/ml), chloroamphenicol (30 μg/ml), or tetracycline (20 μg/ml) were supplemented to the growth medium. All chemicals used in this study were procured from Sigma, unless otherwise specified all restriction and other enzymes used in DNA manipulations were from ThermoScientific. Routine DNA manipulations were performed following standard procedures (16).

TABLE 1.

Strains and plasmids used in the study

Description Reference
Strains
    E. coli DH5α λsupE44 ΔlacU169 (Δ80 lacZΔM15) 50
hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi1 relA1
    E. coli BL21 hsdS gal (ΔcIts857 ind1 Sam7 nin5) lacUV5 T7 gene1 51
    E. coli S17–1 thi pro hsd Rhsd MrecA RP4 2-Tc::Mu-Kmr::Tn7 (Tpr, Spr, Smr) 52
    BTH101 F cya-99 araD139 galE15 galK16 rpsL1 (Strr ) hsdR2 mcrA1 mcrB1 53
    ArcticExpress E. coli B F ompT hsdS (rB mB) dcm+ Tetr gal endA Hte (cpn10 cpn60 Gentr) Agilent Technologies
    B. diminuta Smr, PmBr, opd+ 11
    B. diminuta DS010 Smr, Tcr, PmBr, opd (opd::tet) 15

Plasmids
    pMMB206 Cmr, broad host range, low copy number, expression vector 54
    pGEMT-Easy Ampr, TA cloning vector Promega
    pTZ57 R/T Ampr, TA cloning vector Fermentas
    pET23b Ampr, T7 promoter and a C-terminal His6 tag Novagen
    pETduet1 Ampr, contains two multiple cloning sites downstream of T7 promoter. Novagen
    pRSETA Ampr, T7 promoter and a N-terminal His6 tag Thermo Scientific
    pSM5 Cmr, complete opd gene encoding preOPH, cloned in pMMB206 as EcoRI and HindIII fragment 13, 46
    pKNT25 Plasmid for the expression of C-terminal T25-fusion proteins (Kanr) 31
    pUT18C pUT18C Plasmid for the expression of N-terminal T18-fusion proteins (Ampr) 31
    pCSOPH Cmr, derivative of pSM5 encoding OPHC24S This work
    pOPH141HIS Cmr, derivative of pSM5 encoding OPH with 10 histidine residues between 141–142 residues. This work
    pUT18COPH Ampr, complete opd gene cloned inframe to code for C-terminal T18 fragment. This work
    pUT18CPstS Ampr, complete pstS gene cloned inframe to code for C-terminal T18 fragment. This work
    pKNT25OPH Kmr, complete opd gene cloned inframe to code for N-terminal T25 fragment. This work
    pKNT25PstS Kmr, complete pstS gene cloned inframe to code for N-terminal T25 fragment. This work
    pOPHV400 Cmr, Avi tag coding sequence inserted as XhoI and HindIII fragment in pSM5, codes for OPHCAviTag This work
    pAVB400 Ampr, opd variant coding OPHCAviTag taken as EcoRI and HindIII fragment from pOPHV400 and cloned into one of the two multiple cloning sites of pETduet1. The birA gene amplified from E. coli as NdeI and XhoI fragment was cloned in the second multiple cloning site. Codes for OPHCAviTag, and BirA ligase. This work
    pPST300 Ampr, the pstS amplified from B. diminuta as NdeI and XhoI fragment was cloned in pET23b. Codes for PstSN6His This work
    pLPST300 Cmr, pstS amplified from pPST300 as BglII and HindIII fragment cloned in pMMB206 digested with BamHI and HindIII. This work
    pTOLC400 Ampr, The tolC gene amplified from B. diminuta cloned as BglII and EcoRI fragment in pRSETA. Codes for TolCN6His This work
    pTLOPH Cmr, the opd gene amplified as EcoRI and HindIII fragment cloned in pMMB206. Codes for untagged OPH under control of the tac promoter. This work
TABLE 2.

Primers used in the study

The bold case indicates respective restriction sites.

Primer name Sequence Appending sites
C24S FP GGCCTGGCTGGGTCCCGCGAGCGTGGCTG Forward primer used to introduce serine in place of cysteine at 24th position
C24S RP CAGCCACGCTCGCGGGATCCCAGCCAGGCC Reverse primer used to introduce serine in place of cysteine at 24th position
140bamHI FP TCGATGCGATTGGGATCCGTAGAGGAACTCA Forward primer used to create BamHI site at 426th nucleotide position
140bamHI RP TGAGTTCCTCTACGGATCCCAATCGCATCGA Reverse primer used to create BamHI site at 426th nucleotide position
10x HIS FP bglII GCGCAGATCTCACCACCACCACCACCACCACCACCACCACAGATCTGCGC Forward primer coding for 10 histidine residues with BglII site
10x HIS RP bglII GCGCAGATCTGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGAGATCTGCGC Reverse primer coding for 10 histidine residues with BglII site
PDSIII GGGTGCGCGGAGCGTGCATATGTCGATCGGCACAGGC Forward primer used to amplify opd gene with NdeI site
PDSIV GGATCCAGATGCTCGAGTGACGCCCGCAAGG Reverse primer used to amplify opd gene with XhoI site
POPD-F GGGAATTCTGCGCGGAGCGTGCATATGTCGATCGGCACAGGC Forward primer used to amplify opd gene with EcoRI site
POPD-R AACCGAAGCTTCAGATGGCGTGAGGGCGG Reverse primer used to amplify opd gene with HindIII site
PstS-F TGCCTGCAGAATGTTCAAGACATTCGCTCCCAAG Forward primer used to amplify pstS with a PstI site
PstS-R CTGAATTCTTTCAGCTCGCTGCCATCCAG Reverse primer used to amplify pstS with a EcoRI site
PstSPET-F GCGCCATATGGCCAAGACATTTGCCCTT Forward primer used to amplify pstS with a NdeI site
PstSPET-R GCGACTCGAGTTTCAGCACCGACCCGTC Reverse primer used to amplify pstS with a XhoI site
PstSPMB-F CCCAGATCTAGAAATAATTTT Forward primer used to amplify pstS from pPST300 with a BglII site
PstSPMB-R CCTTAAGCTTCTAGTTATTGCTCAGCGGTGGC Reverse primer used to amplify pstS from pPST300 with a HindIII site
AviTag-F GCTATCCTCGAGGGCCTGAACCGCATCTTCGAGGCTCAGAAAATCGAA Forward primer coding AviTag with a XhoI site
AviTag-R GCAGCTAAGCTTGCGGCCGCTTAGTGCCATTCGATTTTCTGAGCCTCG Reverse primer coding AviTag with a HindIII site
BirA-F GCACACATATGAAGGATAACACCGTGCCACTG Forward primer used to amplify birA from E. coli with a NdeI site
BirA-R CTCCCCTCTCGAGTTTTTCTGCAC Reverse primer used to amplify birA from E. coli with a XhoI site.
TolCPRT-F AAAAGATCTACATGAAACCCGTTCGCCG Forward primer used to amplify tolC from B. diminuta with a BglII site
TolCPRT-R AAAGAATTCCTATTGGTGCGGCAGGTTGCT Reverse primer used to amplify tolC from B. diminuta with a EcoRI site
Carbonate and Urea Extraction

Total membrane preparations were made from B. diminuta following standard procedures (17). The cytoplasmic membrane was isolated by following the discontinuous sucrose gradient method described elsewhere (18) and equal amounts of membrane was resuspended in buffer containing different concentrations of sodium carbonate, pH 11.5, or urea (2–8 m as indicated). After a 1-h incubation at room temperature the samples were centrifuged at 227,226 × g using a TLA 120.2 rotor (Beckman coulter) for 45 min to pellet the washed membranes. Detection of OPH in the wash supernatant and membrane fractions was achieved by Western blots using anti-OPH antibodies (15). The quantity of OPH in membrane and supernatant fractions were densitometrically determined by comparing with the OPH signal obtained with untreated membrane.

Globomycin Treatment

The opd null mutant, B. dimimuta DS010 containing the plasmid pSM5 was grown in LB medium to mid-log phase (0.6 OD at 600 nm) and 50 μg/ml of globomycin (Sigma) was added to the culture medium 1 h before the expression of OPH was induced by addition of 3 mm isopropyl β-d-galactopyranoside (IPTG) (19, 20). After 6 h of induction, the culture was harvested, washed in SET buffer (500 mm sucrose, 5 mm EDTA, and 20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0), and used to prepare periplasmic, cytosolic, and total membrane fractions as described previously (21, 22). OPH-specific signals in the subcellular fractions were detected by performing Western blot analysis.

Generation of OPHC24S

The invariant cysteine residue in the lipobox motif of the OPH signal peptide was modified to serine by performing QuikChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene). Plasmid pSM5 was used as template and the cysteine to serine codon substitution was confirmed by sequencing. The resulting plasmid coding for OPHC24S was designated pCSOPH. The B. diminuta DS010 (pCSOPH) cultures were grown to mid-log phase and the expression of OPHC24S was induced overnight by supplementation with 3 mm IPTG. The cells expressing OPHC24S were subsequently harvested, washed, and fractionated into periplasm, cytoplasm, and total membrane for the detection of OPH. A similar fractionation procedure was undertaken with B. diminuta DS010 (pSM5) to assess membrane anchorage of OPH in wild type cells.

Solubilization of OPH from the Inner Membrane

Inner membrane preparations were isolated from a 10-liter overnight culture of B. diminuta following procedures described elsewhere (18). The isolated inner membrane was resuspended in minimal amounts of buffer (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mm NaCl, 2% glycerol) and after estimating the protein concentration the buffer volume was adjusted to give a final protein concentration of 5 mg/ml. Triton X-100 (2 g/g of protein), Triton X-114 (2 g/g of protein), n-dodecyl β-d-maltoside (DDM) (1 g/g of protein), and digitonin (8 g/g of protein) were separately added to aliquots of the membrane suspension and samples were incubated with gentle rotation (10 rpm) for 1 h at 4 °C. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to ultracentrifugation (117,000 × g) and the clarified supernatants, containing solubilized protein, were removed into prechilled tubes. The detergent-insoluble fraction was resuspended in an equal volume of buffer and the OPH activity was estimated in both detergent-soluble and detergent-insoluble fractions (3). The percent of OPH released from the membrane was calculated by comparing the total OPH activity associated with the untreated membrane. Subsequently, for identification of fatty acids attached to OPH, the protein was solubilized using 1.5% Triton X-100 as it disrupts interactions of OPH with other proteins and facilitates purification of OPH without interacting partners.

Affinity Purification of OPH and Identification of Fatty Acids

For purification of OPH-specific antibodies, 10 mg of pure OPH, purified as described elsewhere (23), was coupled to 400 μl of CNBr-activated SepharoseTM 4B (GE Healthcare) following the manufacturer's protocol. Aliquots of OPH antisera (15) were passed through the OPH-coupled Sepharose column at a flow rate of 0.5 ml per min. The flow-through was collected carefully and reloaded onto the column to ensure complete binding of OPH-specific antibodies to the column. The unbound antibodies and serum proteins were removed by washing the column with 3 column volumes of wash buffer (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6). The bound anti-OPH antibodies were eluted (0.1 m glycine-HCl, pH 2.5) as 1-ml fractions into pre-chilled tubes containing 100 μl of 1 m Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, to ensure quick neutralization of the eluate. The antibody fractions were then pooled and dialyzed against coupling buffer (10 mm sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, 150 mm NaCl).

For coupling to protein A/G beads, approximately 1 mg of purified anti-OPH antibodies were mixed with 500 μl of protein A/G-agarose plus beads (ThermoScientific) equilibrated with coupling buffer and kept for 1 h at 4 °C with gentle shaking. The contents were loaded onto a column and the excess unbound antibodies were removed by washing the column with 3 column volumes of coupling buffer. The anti-OPH antibodies bound to protein A/G-agarose beads were covalently linked by adding one column void volume of cross-linking buffer (10 mm sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, 150 mm NaCl), 2.5 mm disuccinimidyl suberate to the column. The column was left for 1 h at room temperature to complete cross-reaction and excess disuccinimidyl suberate was quenched by washing the column with 25 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6. The OPH-antibody cross-linked protein A/G-agarose beads were then taken into a clean tube and suspended in 1 ml of prechilled binding buffer (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mm NaCl, 2% glycerol). Immediately, Triton X-100-solubilized membrane proteins of B. diminuta were added to the beads and left overnight at 4 °C with head to head rotation. After incubation the contents were loaded onto a column, washed thoroughly with wash buffer, and the bound proteins were then eluted with glycine-HCl, pH 2.5, prior to neutralization with 100 mm Tris-HCl, pH 9.0. About 100 μg of immuno-purified OPH was esterified using methanolic-HCl (24). The fatty acid methyl esters generated from OPH were then analyzed using Agilent GC/MS equipped with a quadrupole mass selective detector. Control samples were prepared from the periplasmic fraction of B. diminuta DS010 (pCSOPH) and treated identically to identify the fatty acid methyl esters.

Identification of the OPH Interactome

To identify interacting proteins, OPH was affinity purified using two different approaches. Before proceeding with the purification of OPH, the cell pellet collected from wild type B. diminuta was resuspended in PBS buffer (1 g/10 ml) before treatment with 25 mm formaldehyde (25, 26). The formaldehyde cross-linked cell pellet was sonicated (10 cycles of 20-s ON and 40-s OFF) and the membrane fraction was isolated following established procedures (27). The membrane pellet was extracted three times with 5 ml of chloroform:methanol (1:3) and the precipitated proteins were resolubilized in phosphate buffer (0.1 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.6, 350 mm NaCl, 5% glycerol, 1% DDM, and 50 mm imidazole). The first approach involved immunopurification using anti-OPH antibody cross-linked protein A/G-agarose beads. The resolubilized cross-linked OPH complex was passed through the column containing the antibody-linked beads at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. The flow-through was repeatedly passed through the column until negligible amounts of OPH was detected in the flow-through sample. After washing the column with 3 column volumes of wash buffer (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mm NaCl, 2% glycerol, 0.1% DDM), the bound cross-linked OPH complex was eluted as described above, and subsequently analyzed both under native and denaturing conditions. Blue native-PAGE (28) and gel filtration (Superose 6, 10/300 GL, GE Healthcare) were performed to assess the molecular mass of the OPH complex. Tricine-PAGE (29) was performed to visualize polypeptides coeluting with OPH.

In an alternative approach, a deca-histidine-tagged OPH variant (OPH10xHis) was generated. To achieve this, a DNA fragment encoding 10 histidine residues was introduced into the opd gene, between nucleotide positions 420 and 426 that encodes amino acids in a loop region of OPH. First, a BamHI restriction site was introduced into opd by performing QuikChange mutagenesis between nucleotide positions 420 and 426 using plasmid pSM5 as template. Next, the synthetic DNA fragment encoding the 10 histidine residues was prepared as a BglII fragment and inserted in-frame into the opd gene at the generated BamHI site. The resultant plasmid was designated pOPH141HIS. Plasmid pOPH141HIS was mobilized into B. diminuta DS010, and B. diminuta DS010 (pOPH141HIS) cells were then induced to express OPH10xHis by addition of IPTG at a final concentration of 3 mm. After incubation with IPTG for 5 h the cells were harvested and the cell pellet was resuspended in PBS buffer (1 g/10 ml) and treated with 25 mm formaldehyde to cross-link OPH. The formaldehyde cross-linked cell pellet was processed as described earlier to obtain total membrane pellet. The pellet was then extracted three times with 5 ml of chloroform:methanol (1:3) and the precipitated proteins were resolubilized before loading the soluble proteins onto a nickel-charged immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). Following washing with phosphate buffer, bound protein was eluted with 500 mm imidazole in phosphate buffer and analyzed both on blue native and Tricine-PAGE. The affinity purified OPH complexes were subjected to tryptic digestion and mass spectrometry (LTQ-Orbitrap XL ETD mass spectrometer) as described elsewhere (30) to establish the identity of OPH interacting proteins.

Bacterial Two-hybrid System

Protein-protein interactions were studied by the bacterial two-hybrid system (BACTH, Euromedex) following protocols described elsewhere (31). The T25 and T18 domains were separately fused to the N or C termini of the target proteins (OPH and PstS). The fusions were produced independently by cloning the opd and pstS genes in either pKNT25 or pUT18C. Cells of Escherichia coli strain BTH101 (Euromedex) were transformed with different combinations of fusion plasmids i.e. pUT18CPstS-pKNT25OPH and pUT18COPH-pKNT25PstS. The combinations pUT18CPstS-pKNT25 and pUT18COPH-pKNT25 served as controls. β-Galactosidase assay was performed as described elsewhere (32).

Pulldown Assay of Coexpressed Proteins

Interaction of OPH with a phosphate-binding protein, PstS, and a efflux pump component, TolC, was determined by performing coexpression pulldown assays (33). Initially, an opd gene variant engineered to code for OPH with C-terminal AviTag was generated. Two complementary oligos specifying the AviTag sequence (AviTag-F and AviTag-R; Table 2) were annealed, digested with XhoI and HindIII, and cloned into similarly digested plasmid pSM5 to give plasmid pOPHV400, this procedure results in insertion of the AviTag coding sequence in-frame with opd. Next, the opd gene from plasmid pOPHV400 was excised as an EcoRI and HindIII fragment and cloned into one of the multiple cloning sites of pETduet1 vector that had been similarly digested. Subsequently, the birA gene was cloned as an NdeI and XhoI fragment into the second multiple cloning site of this construct. The cloning strategy places birA under control of the T7 promoter, allowing for regulatable expression of biotin ligase, the enzyme required to ligate biotin at the conserved lysine residue of the AviTag. The resulting pETduet1 derivative, designated pAVB400, codes for both OPHCAviTag and the biotin ligase. The pstS gene was amplified from B. diminuta and cloned initially in pET23b as an NdeI-XhoI fragment. The generated recombinant plasmid, pPST300, codes PstSC6His. After confirming expression of PstSC6His, pstS was amplified from pPST300 using primers PstSPMB-F and PstSPMB-R, respectively, and cloned into similarly digested pMMB206 to give plasmid pLPST300, which encodes PstSC6His controlled by the tac promoter of the vector. E. coli ArcticExpress cells harboring pAVB400 were transformed with pLPST300 and the expression of OPHCAviTag and PstSC6His was induced following standard procedures. The total cell lysate was prepared and the clear lysate was used to isolate OPHCAviTag and any interacting partners using streptavidin magnetic beads (Dynabeads M-280 Streptavidin, Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocols. The proteins bound to magnetic beads were analyzed by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and probed either with anti-OPH or anti-His antibodies to detect OPHCaviTag and PstSC6His. Cell lysates prepared either from ArcticExpress (pAVB400) or ArcticExpress (pLPST300) cells treated in a similar manner served as controls.

OPH-TolC Interactions

The tolC gene was amplified from B. diminuta and cloned as a BglII-EcoRI fragment into similarly digested pRSETA. As the cloning strategy facilitates in-frame fusion of the vector-specified His tag to tolC, the resulting recombinant plasmid, pTOLC400, codes for TolCN6His. Similarly, the opd gene was amplified from B. diminuta as an EcoRI-HindIII fragment and cloned into similarly digested pMMB206. The resulting recombinant plasmid, pTLOPH, codes for OPH without any affinity tag, expressed under control of the tac promoter. The TolCN6His and OPH were coexpressed by adding 1 mm IPTG to the mid-log phase cultures of ArcticExpress (pTLOPH400 + pTOLC400). Similarly, the expression of TolCN6His and OPH were induced from ArcticExpress (pTLOPH400) and ArcticExpress (pTLOPH400) cells before preparing clear lysate (4 ml) from 50 ml of culture. The lysate was then incubated overnight with 20 μl of MagneHis beads (Promega) at 4 °C with constant mixing. After incubation, the beads were collected and washed following the manufacturer's protocol and the presence of TolCN6His and OPH were detected by performing immunoblots probed either with anti-OPH or anti-His antibodies.

Results

OPH Is Tightly Bound to the B. diminuta Inner Membrane

It has previously been demonstrated that OPH is associated with the inner membrane of B. diminuta (15). To probe the nature of the interaction of OPH with the membrane, we first determined whether the protein could be released from membrane fractions following washing under alkaline conditions using sodium carbonate (Fig. 1A), or under strong denaturing conditions in the presence of urea (Fig. 1B). At concentrations of sodium carbonate normally used to extract peripheral membrane proteins (0.1–0.5 m) (34), very little OPH was released from the membrane, suggesting a relatively tight association with the bilayer. However, at higher concentrations of carbonate, significant levels of OPH were released (Fig. 1A). Likewise the protein was also relatively refractory to extraction by urea, with most of the protein remaining associated with the membrane fraction even in the presence of 8 m urea (Fig. 1B). This behavior is consistent with OPH being an integral protein of the inner membrane rather than associating with the membrane by electrostatic interaction or through binding to other inner membrane proteins.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

OPH remains membrane-associated in the presence of sodium carbonate or urea. Inner membranes isolated from B. diminuta cells were washed with increasing concentrations of either sodium carbonate (panel A) or urea (panel B), as indicated. The pellet (P) and supernatant (S) fractions after washing were separated by SDS-PAGE (12.5% acrylamide), and either stained with Coomassie Blue (upper panels) or blotted and probed with an OPH antibody (lower panels). The untreated membrane (C) is loaded along with the treated samples as a control. M, molecular weight marker.

OPH Is a Lipoprotein

The Tat system is known to assemble some membrane-anchored proteins (20, 35, 36). In bacteria these usually have either a single transmembrane domain at the C terminus (35) or an N-terminal non-cleaved twin-arginine signal anchor sequence (37). However, bioinformatic analysis supported by structural studies show that OPH has no C-terminal hydrophobic helical domain (38) and the N-terminal signal peptide of OPH is cleaved off during biosynthesis and therefore cannot serve as a signal anchor (15).

A third class of bacterial membrane proteins that are known to be assembled by the Tat pathway is lipoproteins (20, 39, 40). In silico analysis of the OPH signal peptide, shown in Fig. 2A, predicts the existence of both signal peptidase II (SpaseII) and multiple signal peptidase I (SpaseI) cleavage sites in pre-OPH, with the SpaseII cleavage site predicted with the highest level of confidence. In addition to the predicted SpaseII cleavage site, a well conserved lipobox containing a cysteine residue was found in the c-region of the signal peptide (Fig. 2A). To determine whether OPH was a substrate of SpaseII, we treated cells of B. diminuta DS010 (pSM5) with globomycin, which inhibits processing of the prolipoprotein by binding irreversibly to the peptidase (20, 41). In support of the in silico prediction, in the globomycin-treated cultures most of the OPH accumulated in the cytoplasmic fraction in an unprocessed form (Fig. 2B, lane 1). This is in contrast with the untreated cells where very little precursor was detectable (Fig. 2B, lane 2). Moreover, there was substantially less mature OPH detectable in the membrane fraction following globomycin treatment (Fig. 2B, lane 3).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

OPH is a lipoprotein. A, bioinformatic analysis of the OPH signal peptide. The predicted SPaseII cleavage site (green bar), lipo-box (green font), and the invariant cysteine residue (red font) found at the junction of the SPaseII cleavage site are shown. Potential SPaseI cleavage sites are indicated with red bars. The twin arginines of the Tat signal peptide are underlined. B, SDS-PAGE analysis (12.5% acrylamide; upper panel, shown as a loading control) and anti-OPH Western blot (lower panel) of membrane (M) and cytoplasmic (C) proteins extracted from globomycin-treated (+) and untreated (−) cells of B. diminuta DS010 (pSM5). Lanes 5 and 6 show pure mOPH (5) and pre-OPH (6) used as molecular size markers. C and D, SDS-PAGE (12.5% acrylamide; upper panel) and corresponding Western blot (lower panel) of proteins extracted from periplasmic, cytoplasmic, and membrane fractions of B. diminuta DS010 containing (C) plasmid pSM5 that produces wild type OPH or (D) plasmid pCSOPH producing OPHC24S. Lanes 4 and 5 indicate mOPH (4) and pre-OPH (5) used as molecular size markers.

To provide additional evidence that OPH is a lipoprotein, we generated a serine substitution of the essential cysteine in the OPH signal sequence lipobox (OPHC24S) and compared the subcellular location of this variant to that of the wild type protein (Fig. 2, C and D). Unlike the wild type protein where the mature form is found in the membrane fraction (Fig. 2C), most of the processed form of OPHC24S was found in periplasm, with very little seen in the membrane (Fig. 2D). Because SpaseII acts only on acylated prolipoproteins to generate S-lipidated cysteine at the N terminus of the mature protein (42), it is assumed that the mature-sized form of OPHC24S found in the periplasmic fraction results from processing by SpaseI (Fig. 2A), which is predicted bioinformatically to recognize this signal peptide (Fig. 2A). Taken together these results demonstrate that OPH is a membrane-anchored lipoprotein.

Mature OPH Is Linked to Myristic and Oleic Fatty Acids

Previous findings have shown that generally diacyl glycerol serves as a lipid anchor for membrane-associated lipoproteins (43). To confirm the nature of the lipid anchor on membrane-bound OPH and to identify the fatty acid modifications, we extracted fatty acids from affinity purified OPH and OPHC24S (as a negative control) using methanolic HCl extraction (24). The fatty acid methyl esters generated due to transesterification were extracted and analyzed using GC-MS. As shown in Fig. 3, A and B, two novel peaks were identified arising from the mOPH purified from B. diminuta membranes, which were not observed in the control sample derived from OPHC24S. These two peaks corresponded to methyl myristate (C14:0) and methyl oleic acid (C18:1) with 97 and 99% identities (Fig. 3, C–F). These results demonstrate that OPH is anchored to the membrane through diacylglycerol, which is linked with myristic and oleic groups.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Fatty acids associated with the invariant cysteine residue of OPH. Gas chromatograms of the fatty acid methyl esters extracted from OPHC24S (A) and wild type OPH (B). The novel fatty acid peaks found in the wild type OPH sample are highlighted with boxes. The MS pattern of novel peaks obtained at retention times of 17.01 (C) and 20.83 (D) and corresponding library search results are shown in E for the 17.01 peak and F for the 20.83 peak.

OPH Interacts with Phosphate ABC Transporter

To gain further clues about the physiological role of OPH, we next sought to identify whether it interacted with other cellular proteins. First we developed a strategy to purify OPH in its native state by dispersing the membrane fraction with the non-ionic detergents Triton X-114, DDM, and digitonin. Of the three detergents, DDM facilitated the best release of OPH (liberating ∼70% of total OPH; data not shown).

Next, we developed a strategy to purify DDM-solubilized OPH. In the crystal structure of OPH the C-terminal region is exposed (38), and we therefore constructed a strain of B. diminuta producing OPH with a C-terminal His6 tag. However, the DDM-solubilized OPHC6His failed to bind the nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid column, suggesting that the C terminus of OPH is not able to interact with the affinity matrix, possibly due to masking of this region by a partner protein subunit. To resolve this problem, we again used the crystal structure of OPH as a reference to introduce an internal His10 tag internally into a loop region of OPH. This variant, designated OPH10xHis, bound well to the nickel-affinity matrix following solubilization from the membrane. The affinity-purified OPH10xHis sample was further analyzed both by BN-PAGE and gel filtration. These two independent experiments both suggested that OPH10xHis was present in a complex of around 294 kDa (Fig. 4, A and B). Assuming that the detergent used to solubilize OPH from the membrane may interfere with the determination of an accurate molecular mass for the OPH complex, the isolated membranes from the formaldehyde-treated B. diminuta DS010 (pOPH141HIS) cells were extracted with chloroform:methanol (1:3) to delipidate the sample and the resulting membrane protein precipitate was resolubilized before proceeding with affinity purification of the cross-linked OPH complex. BN-PAGE analysis of the OPH complex isolated in this way coincided with the mass of the OPH complex purified from detergent-solubilized membranes (compare Fig. 4, B with C, lane 3).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Purification of an OPH complex. A and B, molecular mass determination of the nickel affinity purified OPH complex from detergent-extracted membranes by (A) gel filtration and (B) BN-PAGE. A, the bold inverted arrows indicate elution volumes of thyroglobulin (669 kDa), ferritin (440 kDa), aldolase (158 kDa), ovalbumin (44 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa), and ribonuclease (13 kDa) used to calibrate the column. B, BN-PAGE analysis (4–16% acrylamide) of IMAC purified OPH complex (lane 2). Panels C and D show BN-PAGE analysis of IMAC purified OPH complex (C) and Tricine-SDS-PAGE (D) analysis of the formaldehyde cross-linked OPH complex purified after delipidation by the extracting the membrane proteins with chloroform:methanol (1:3). C, the immunopurified OPH complex is shown in lane 1 and the IMAC purified complex in lane 3. Molecular weight markers are in lane 2. D, Tricine-SDS-PAGE (4–16%) profile (left) and corresponding Western blots probed using anti-OPH antibodies (right) for immunopurified OPH complex (lane 2) and IMAC purified complex (lane 3). Molecular weight markers are in lane 1.

To validate these findings we employed a second, independent approach to purify untagged OPH. The membranes isolated from the formaldehyde cross-linked B. diminuta wild type cells were extracted with chloroform:methanol (1:3) and the resolubilized membrane proteins were passed through a protein A column that had been cross-linked with OPH-specific antibodies. The size of the OPH complex obtained following this purification process coincided with the BN-PAGE profile of the OPH complex purified following nickel-affinity column (IMAC) (Fig. 4C, lane 3). We therefore conclude that OPH is present in an ∼293 kDa complex.

The delipidated OPH complexes purified by immunoaffinity and IMAC were analyzed by Tricine-SDS-PAGE. It can be seen (Fig. 4D) that several protein bands with similar sizes are common between the two samples, although bands with apparent masses of 38, 35, and 15 kDa are more intense in the immunopurified OPH complex. The 35-kDa protein coincided with the size of OPH and its identity was also established by performing a Western immunoblot with anti-OPH antibodies (Fig. 4D).

After establishing that OPH is a multiprotein complex, we performed mass spectrometry to obtain unique peptide sequences from proteins copurifying with OPH following IMAC. The obtained peptide sequences were identified using either x!tandem or Mascot web servers. Proteins that matched with more than two peptide sequences are listed in Table 3. From the list of proteins, subunits of the F1Fo-ATP synthase (α, β, γ), the phosphate ABC transporter substrate-binding protein (PstS) and efflux pump components AcrB and TolC were identified as candidate OPH interacting partners (Table 3). It is interesting to note that the identified peptides matched with proteins involved either in phosphate uptake (44) or in effluxing of xenobiotics (45), as organophosphates are xenobiotics that also contain a potential source of phosphate.

TABLE 3.

Unique peptide sequences identified in OPH complex

Unique peptides Peptide sequences % Coverage Mr Accession Description Function Subcellular localization
4 TIVDVSTFDIGR/ASLATGVPVTTHTAASQR/VNPDGMAFIPLR/GVPQE TLAGITVTNPAR/ 17 35.7 gi 13786716 Phosphotriesterase (B. diminuta) Unusual substrate specificity for synthetic organophosphate triesters Plasma membrane
4 SDLPDGILEPQVVR/VILDPAR/IATLGDIDQNAAK/AYNDVNQAVQQIR 4.3 123.3 gi 103485965 AcrB, acriflavin resistance protein (S. alaskensis RB2256) Transporter activity Integral component of membrane
3 LEGVVASLASK/GLAGAFNSNIVK/ LTIQYNR 7.2 31 gi 103487768 F0F1 ATP synthase subunitγ (S. alaskensis RB2256) Proton-transporting ATP synthase activity, rotational mechanism Plasma membrane
2 FTQAGSEVSALLGR/ VIDLLAPYAR 2.5 53.9 gi 103487769 F0F1 ATP synthase subunitβ (S. alaskensis RB2256) Proton-transporting ATP synthase activity, rotational mechanism Plasma membrane
2 LELAQYR/LSVGDGIA 1.2 54.4 gi 103487767 F0F1 ATP synthase subunitα (S. alaskensis RB2256) Proton-transporting ATP synthase activity, rotational mechanism Plasma membrane
2 LALAEGDLR/VADPSFGVR 1.6 52.6 gi 103487743 Type I secretion outer membrane protein, TolC (S. alaskensis RB2256) Outer membrane channel, required for several efflux systems such as AcrAB-TolC, AcrEF-TolC, EmrAB-TolC, and MacAB-TolC Cell outer membrane
2 FDAAGVPNLK/VIGSPGYPAEEER 3 32.2 gi 103487703 α/β Hydrolase (S. alaskensis RB2256) Hydrolase activity/ aromatic compounds Unknown
2 LPAVAISVFG/ISAVGSSTV 3 34.2 gi 159795674 Phosphate preplasmic binding protein Psts (Y. pestis) Phosphate binding periplamsic component Periplasm
OPH Interacts with Phosphate-specific Transport Component PstS

As PstS is a periplasmic protein that binds specifically to inorganic phosphate, we chose to further probe potential interaction of OPH with PstS. Initially we undertook bacterial two-hybrid analysis to assess OPH-PstS interactions. When PstS was fused to the C terminus of the adenylate cyclase T18 fragment and OPH to the N terminus of the T25 fragment, adenylate cyclase activity was reconstituted, and strong β-galactosidase activity could be measured (Fig. 5A). A similar strong interaction was also seen when OPH was fused to the C terminus of the adenylate cyclase T18 fragment and PstS to the N terminus of the T25 fragment. To confirm that OPH and PstS directly interact, we performed coexpression pulldown assays. To this end we generated compatible plasmids coding forOPHCAviTag (pAVB400) and PstSN6His (pPST300). In addition, plasmid pAVB400 also codes for the biotin ligase, BirA, to facilitate ligation of biotin at the conserved lysine residue of AviTag found at the C terminus of OPHCAviTag. After inducing the production of OPHCAviTag, PstSN6His, and biotin ligase in the heterologous host E. coli, streptavidin-linked beads were used to isolate biotinylated OPHCAviTag. As shown in Fig. 5B, PstSN6His copurified with the biotinylated OPHCAviTag (Fig. 5B, lane 4), but was not purified by the streptavidin-linked beads in the absence of OPHCAviTag (Fig. 5B, lane 6), providing conclusive proof that OPH and PstS are interaction partners.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

OPH directly interacts with PstS and TolC. A, interactions between the indicated variants of OPH and PstS fused to either the T18 or T25 fragments of Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase, as indicated. Error bars represent the mean ± S.E. (n = 3). Also shown are controls performed with either OPH or PstS fused to the T18 fragment tested against the unfused T25 fragment. Significance was assessed using Student's t test, where * signifies p < 0.0001 and ** signifies p < 0.0001 relative to the value for T18-PstS + T25 and T18-OPH + T25, respectively. B, tagged variants of OPH and PstS copurify. The Western blotting for SDS-PAGE (12.5% acrylamide), probed with anti-OPH (top panel) or anti-His antibodies (bottom panel) show cell lysate (CL) of E. coli strain ArcticExpress producing OPHCaviTag, BirA, and PstSC6His (lane 1), incubated with streptavidin magnetic beads. FT, flow-through (lane 2); W, wash fraction (lane 3); and E, eluted bound protein from the beads (lane 4). Lanes 5–8 represent control lanes showing elution (E) of bound protein when the streptavidin magnetic beads were incubated with the ArcticExpress cell lysates prepared from the cultures induced to express OPHCaviTag, BirA only (lane 5), or PstSC6His (lane 6). The total cell lysates expressing PstSC6His (lane 7) and OPHCaviTag (lane 8) were loaded as positive controls. C, OPH copurifies with His-tagged TolC. Lysates of ArcticExpress producing OPH and TolCN6His (lane 1) were incubated with nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid magnetic beads. FT, flow-through (lane 2); W, wash fraction (lane 3); and E, eluted bound protein from the beads (lane 4) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (12.5% acrylamide). Lanes 5 and 6 are controls showing eluted proteins bound to the nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid magnetic beads incubated with the lysates prepared from the ArcticExpress cells expressing OPH and TolCN6His. Total cell lysates having OPH (lane 7) and TolCN6His (lane 8) are loaded as positive controls.

Efflux Pump Component TolC Interacts with OPH

Analysis of the OPH interactome indicated that efflux pump components AcrA, AcrB, and TolC also copurified with OPH isolated from B. diminuta (Table 3). We next sought to assess whether there was a direct interaction between OPH and any of these three proteins by heterologous expression and pairwise copurification studies. Unfortunately, we were unable to express B. diminuta AcrA and AcrB in E. coli. However, TolC with an N-terminal His tag was successfully produced in the E. coli ArcticExpress strain. We therefore coexpressed untagged OPH along with TolCN6His and isolated TolCN6His from total cell lysates using MagneHis beads. Fig. 5C shows that when TolCN6His was affinity purified, the mature form of OPH was also copurified (Fig. 5C, lane 4). Because OPH produced in the absence of TolCN6His was unable to interact with the beads (Fig. 5C, lane 6), it can be concluded that OPH and TolC can directly interact with each other.

OPH Supports B. diminuta Growth with Methyl Parathion as Sole Phosphate Source

The enzymatic action of OPH generates alkyl phosphates from a variety of organophosphate insecticides due to its triesterase activity (3). These diesters, like diethyl phosphate, may serve as substrates for periplasmically located phosphatases/diesterases, ultimately generating inorganic phosphate (Pi), raising the possibility that interaction of OPH with PstS facilitates the transport of generated inorganic phosphate into the cell. To examine this further, we investigated the ability of B. diminuta to grow in minimal medium using the OP insecticide methyl parathion as sole source of phosphate. As shown in Fig. 6, B. diminuta DS010 alone was unable to grow using methyl parathion as phosphate source, but when carrying plasmid pSM5, encoding OPH, good growth was seen. These results show that OPH is required to support growth using organophosphates as a source of phosphate.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

OPH supports growth of B. diminuta using the organophosphate methyl parathion as sole phosphate source. Panels A and B show growth of B. diminuta wild type (■), DS010 (▴), and DS010 (pSM5) (●) in minimal medium having either (NH4)2HPO4 (panel A) or methyl parathion as sole phosphate source (panel B).

Discussion

In this study we have investigated the interaction of the organophosphate hydrolase, OPH, from B. diminuta, with the cytoplasmic membrane and with other cellular proteins. Our work has clearly shown that OPH is a lipoprotein, and adds to a growing list of Tat-dependent lipoproteins in bacteria and archaea (20, 44, 47, 48). Interestingly, OPH contains an alanine residue at the +2 position and according to the sorting rules for E. coli lipoproteins (42) should be translocated to the outer membrane by the Lol machinery (the genes for which are found in the genome of B. diminuta). However, a number of exceptions to these sorting “rules” have been seen in other Gram-negative bacteria, for example, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa where lipoproteins having lysine, glycine, and glutamine at the +2 position remain attached to the inner membrane (49). It appears for B. diminuta an alanine at the +2 position also permits inner membrane retention.

Copurification studies using two independent approaches showed that OPH was present as a large multiprotein complex that includes other inner membrane proteins such as a predicted PhoR-like histidine kinase, periplasmic proteins such as PstS, and outer membrane proteins TolC and AcrA. Further support for an OPH complex was provided by demonstrating a direct interaction between OPH and PstS, and between OPH and TolC. Growth studies showed that the indirect liberation of organic phosphates from methyl parathion mediated by OPH can support growth with this compound as the sole phosphate source. These findings point to a potential model whereby the triesterase activity of OPH generates phosphodiesters from a variety of OP insecticides, which are converted to inorganic phosphates by periplasmically located phosphatases (Fig. 7). The PstS protein, identified here as an interacting partner of OPH, is a known component of an established phosphotransfer system (44), and it binds to inorganic phosphate, facilitating its transport across the inner membrane. During OPH-mediated hydrolysis of OP insecticides, in addition to alkyl phosphates, aromatic compounds like p-nitrophenol are also generated. Products such as p-nitrophenol are more toxic than the parent compounds and if they are not quickly metabolized they need to be effluxed for the survival of the organism. In this context, OPH interactions with efflux pumps may serve to quickly eliminate toxic degradation products from the intracellular environment.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

Model for OPH-mediated phosphate acquisition in B. diminuta. The model includes OPH and its interacting partners TolC, AcrA, PstS, and PhoR. The other components of the ABC-type phosphate acquisition system (PstA, PstB, and PstC) for which PstS is the periplasmic binding protein are also shown. Entry of the model OP compound to periplasm (1) and its OPH-mediated hydrolysis (2) generate alkyl phosphate and p-nitrophenol. Pi is generated through the action of periplasmically located phosphatases/diesterases (3), which binds to PstS (4) and is transported into the cytoplasm by the phosphate-specific transport system (5). OM, outer membrane; P, periplasm; IM, inner membrane.

Author Contributions

S. P., H. P., and A. N. performed the experiments. T. P. and D. S. conceived the idea and drafted the manuscript.

Acknowledgment

We thank Prof. P. S. Sastry for critical inputs.

*

This work was supported in part by the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India (to D. S. Laboratory). Department of Animal Biology was supported by the DST-FIST (Department of Science and Technology–Fund for Improvement of S&T Infrastructure), and the School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad is supported by DBT-CREBB/BUILDER (Department of Biotechnology–Centre for Research and Education in Biology and Biotechnology/Boost to University Interdisciplinary Life Science Departments for Education and Research). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

3
The abbreviations used are:
OPH
organophosphate hydrolase
OP
organophosphate insecticides
Tat
Twin arginine transport
SPase
signal peptidase
DDM
n-dodecyl β-d-maltoside
Tricine
N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine
IMAC
immobilized-metal affinity chromatography
BN-PAGE
blue native-PAGE.

References

  • 1. Cho C. M., Mulchandani A., and Chen W. (2002) Bacterial cell surface display of organophosphorus hydrolase for selective screening of improved hydrolysis of organophosphate nerve agents. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 2026–2030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Efrmenko E. N., and Sergeeva V. S. (2001) Organophosphate hydrolase: an enzyme catalyzing degradation of phosphorus-containing toxins and pesticides. Russ. Chem. Bull. (Int. Ed). 50, 1826–1832 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Dumas D. P., Caldwell S. R., Wild J. R., and Raushel F. M. (1989) Purification and Properties of the Phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 19659–19665 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pandeeti E. V. P., Longkumer T., Chakka D., Muthyala V. R., Parthasarathy S., Madugundu A. K., Ghanta S., Medipally S. R., Pantula S. C., Yekkala H., and Siddavattam D. (2012) Multiple mechanisms contribute to lateral transfer of an organophosphate degradation (opd) island in Sphingobium fuliginis ATCC 27551. G3 (Bethesda) 2, 1541–1554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pandeeti E. V., Chakka D., Pandey J. P., and Siddavattam D. (2011) Indigenous organophosphate-degrading (opd) plasmid pCMS1 of Brevundimonas diminuta is self-transmissible and plays a key role in horizontal mobility of the opd gene. Plasmid 65, 226–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Omburo G. A., Kuo J. M., Mullins L. S., and Raushel F. M. (1992) Characterization of the zinc binding site of bacterial phosphotriesterase. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13278–13283 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Walker C. H. (1993) The classification of esterases which hydrolyse organophosphates: Recent developments. Chem. Biol. Interact. 87, 17–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bigley A. N., and Raushel F. M. (2013) Catalytic mechanisms for phosphotriesterases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1834, 443–453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Brown K. A. (1980) Phosphotriesterases of Flavobacterium sp. Soil Biol. Biochem. 12, 105–112 [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Chaudhry G. R., Ali A. N., and Wheeler W. B. (1988) Isolation of a methyl parathion-degrading Pseudomonas sp. that possesses DNA homologous to the opd gene from a Flavobacterium sp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54, 288–293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Serdar C. M., Gibson D. T., Munnecke D. M., and Lancaster J. H. (1982) Plasmid involvement in parathion hydrolysis by Pseudomonas diminuta. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44, 246–249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Mulbry W. W., and Karns J. S. (1989) Purification and characterization of three parathion hydrolases from Gram-negative bacterial strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 289–293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Siddavattam D., Khajamohiddin S., Manavathi B., Pakala S. B., and Merrick M. (2003) Transposon-like organization of the plasmid-borne organophosphate degradation (opd) gene cluster found in Flavobacterium sp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 2533–2539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Palmer T., and Berks B. C. (2012) The twin-arginine translocation (Tat) protein export pathway. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 483–496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gorla P., Pandey J. P., Parthasarathy S., Merrick M., and Siddavattam D. (2009) Organophosphate hydrolase in Brevundimonas diminuta is targeted to the periplasmic face of the inner membrane by the twin arginine translocation pathway. J. Bacteriol. 191, 6292–6299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sambrook, and Russell D. W. (eds) (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 1st Ed, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kaback H. R. (1971) Bacterial membranes. Methods Enzymol. 22, 99–120 [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Schnaitmann C. A. (1970) Protein composition of the cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 104, 890–901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zwiebel L. J., Inukai M., Nakamura K., and Inouye M. (1981) Preferential selection of deletion mutations of the outer membrane lipoprotein gene of Escherichia coli by globomycin. J. Bacteriol. 145, 654–656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Giménez M. I., Dilks K., and Pohlschröder M. (2007) Haloferax volcanii twin-arginine translocation substates include secreted soluble, C-terminally anchored and lipoproteins. Mol. Microbiol. 66, 1597–1606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. van Geest M., and Lolkema J. S. (1996) Membrane topology of the sodium ion-dependent citrate carrier of Klebsiella pneumonia: evidence for a new structural class of secondary transporters. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25582–25589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Weiner J. H., Bilous P. T., Shaw G. M., Lubitz S. P., Frost L., Thomas G. H., Cole J. A., and Turner R. J. (1998) A novel and ubiquitous system for membrane targeting and secretion of cofactor-containing proteins. Cell 93, 93–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kanugula A. K., Repalle E. R., Pandey J. P., Sripad G., Mitra C. K., Dubey D. K., and Siddavattam D. (2011) Immobilization of organophosphate hydrolase on biocompatible gelatine pads and its use in removal of organophosphate compounds and nerve agents. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 48, 29–34 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ichihara K., and Fukubayashi Y. (2010) Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for gas-liquid chromatography. J. Lipid Res. 51, 635–640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Nadeau O. W., and Carlson G. M. (2007) Protein interactions captured by chemical cross-linking: one-step cross-linking with formaldehyde. CSH Protoc. 2007, pdb.prot4634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Sutherland B. W., Toews J., and Kast J. (2008) Utility of formaldehyde cross-linking and mass spectrometry in the study of protein-protein interactions. J. Mass. Spectrom. 43, 699–715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Poole R. K. (1993) The isolation of membranes from bacteria: biomembrane protocols. Methods Mol. Biol. 19, 109–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Schägger H., and von Jagow G. (1991) Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form. Anal. Biochem. 199, 223–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Schägger H. (2006) Tricine–SDS-PAGE. Nat. Protoc. 1, 16–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kim M. S., Kandasamy K., Chaerkady R., and Pandey A. (2010) Assessment of resolution parameters for CID-based shotgun proteomic experiments on the LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 21, 1606–1611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Karimova G., Pidoux J., Ullmann A., and Ladant D. (1998) A bacterial two-hybrid system based on a reconstituted signal transduction pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 5752–5756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Zhang X., and Bremer H. (1995) Control of the Escherichia coli rrnB P1 promoter strength by ppGpp. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11181–11189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Müllerová D., Krajčíková D., and Barák I. (2009) Interactions between Bacillus subtilis early spore coat morphogenetic proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 299, 74–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Molloy M. P., Herbert B. R., Slade M. B., Rabilloud T., Nouwens A. S., Williams K. L., and Gooley A. A. (2000) Proteomic analysis of the Escherichia coli outer membrane. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 2871–2881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hatzixanthis K., Palmer T., and Sargent F. (2003) A subset of bacterial inner membrane proteins integrated by the twin-arginine translocase. Mol. Microbiol. 49, 1377–1390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Keller R., de Keyzer J., Driessen A. J., and Palmer T. (2012) Co-operation between different targeting pathways during integration of a membrane protein. J. Cell Biol. 199, 303–315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Bachmann J., Bauer B., Zwicker K., Ludwig B., and Anderka O. (2006) The Rieske protein from Paracoccus denitrificans is inserted into the cytoplasmic membrane by the twin-arginine translocase. FEBS J. 273, 4817–4830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Benning M. M., Shim H., Raushel F. M., and Holden H. M. (2001) High resolution x-ray structures of different metal-substituted forms of phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta. Biochemistry 40, 2712–2722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Thompson B. J., Widdick D. A., Hicks M. G., Chandra G., Sutcliffe I. C., Palmer T., and Hutchings M. I. (2010) Investigating lipoprotein biogenesis and function in the model Gram-positive bacterium Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol. Microbiol. 77, 943–957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Widdick D. A., Hicks M. G., Thompson B. J., Tschumi A., Chandra G., Sutcliffe I. C., Brülle J. K., Sander P., Palmer T., and Hutchings M. I. (2011) Dissecting the complete lipoprotein biogenesis pathway in Streptomyces scabies. Mol. Microbiol. 80, 1395–1412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Béven L., Le Hénaff M., Fontenelle C., and Wróblewski H. (1996) Inhibition of spiralin processing by the lipopeptide antibiotic globomycin. Curr. Microbiol. 33, 317–322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Narita S., and Tokuda H. (2006) An ABC transporter mediating the membrane detachment of bacterial lipoproteins depending on their sorting signals. FEBS Lett. 580, 1164–1170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sankaran K., and Wu H. C. (1994) Lipid modification of bacterial prolipoprotein: transfer of diacylglyceryl moiety from phosphatidylglycerol. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19701–19706 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Rao N. N., and Torriani A. (1990) Molecular aspects of phosphate transport in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 4, 1083–1090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Hobbs E. C., Yin X., Paul B. J., Astarita J. L., and Storz G. (2012) Conserved small protein associates with the multidrug efflux pump AcrB and differentially affects antibiotic resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A. 109, 16696–16701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Siddavattam D., Raju E. R., Paul P. V., and Merrick M. (2006) Overexpression of parathion hydrolase in Escherichia coli stimulates the synthesis of outer membrane porin OmpF. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 86, 146–150 [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Widdick D. A., Dilks K., Chandra G., Bottrill A., Naldrett M., Pohlschröder M., and Palmer T. (2006) The twin-arginine translocation pathway is a major route of protein export in Streptomyces coelicolor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 17927–17932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Valente F. M., Pereira P. M., Venceslau S. S., Regalla M., Coelho A. V., and Pereira I. A. (2007) The [NiFeSe] hydrogenase from Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough is a bacterial lipoprotein lacking a typical lipoprotein signal peptide. FEBS Lett. 581, 3341–3344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Tanaka S. Y., Narita S., and Tokuda H. (2007) Characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lol system as a lipoprotein sorting mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 13379–13384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hanahan D. (1983) Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J. Mol. Biol. 166, 557–580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Studier F. W., and Moffatt B. A. (1986) Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes. J. Mol. Biol. 189, 113–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Simon R., Priefer U., and Pühler A. (1983)A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram negative bacteria. Nat. Biotechnol. 1, 784–791 [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Karimova G., Dautin N., and Ladant D. (2005) Interaction network among Escherichia coli membrane proteins involved in cell division as revealed by bacterial two-hybrid analysis. J. Bacteriol. 187, 2233–2243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Morales V. M., Bäckman A., and Bagdasarian M. (1991) A series of wide-host-range low-copy number vectors that allow direct screening for recombinants. Gene 97, 39–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES