Skip to main content
Regenerative Biomaterials logoLink to Regenerative Biomaterials
. 2016 Mar 23;3(2):79–86. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbw003

Opportunities and challenges for the biodegradable magnesium alloys as next-generation biomaterials

Wenjiang Ding 1,*
PMCID: PMC4817317  PMID: 27047673

Abstract

In recent years, biodegradable magnesium alloys emerge as a new class of biomaterials for tissue engineering and medical devices. Deploying biodegradable magnesium-based materials not only avoids a second surgical intervention for implant removal but also circumvents the long-term foreign body effect of permanent implants. However, these materials are often subjected to an uncontrolled and fast degradation, acute toxic responses and rapid structural failure presumably due to a localized, too rapid corrosion process. The patented Mg–Nd–Zn–based alloys (JiaoDa BioMg [JDBM]) have been developed in Shanghai Jiao Tong University in recent years. The alloy series exhibit lower biodegradation rate and homogeneous nanophasic degradation patterns as compared with other biodegradable Mg alloys. The in vitro cytotoxicity tests using various types of cells indicate excellent biocompatibility of JDBM. Finally, bone implants using JDBM-1 alloy and cardiovascular stents using JDBM-2 alloy have been successfully fabricated and in vivo long-term assessment via implantation in animal model have been performed. The results confirmed the reduced degradation rate in vivo, excellent tissue compatibility and long-term structural and mechanical durability. Thus, this novel Mg-alloy series with highly uniform nanophasic biodegradation represent a major breakthrough in the field and a promising candidate for manufacturing the next generation biodegradable implants.

Keywords: biodegradable material, magnesium alloys, uniform corrosion, orthopaedic implants, cardiovascular stents

Opportunities for the biodegradable Mg alloys as next-generation biomaterials

In the last few decades, non-degradable metals, namely titanium and titanium alloys and stainless steels, have been the most widely used biomaterials for orthopaedic implants. However, the major limitations of these currently applied metals lie in their undesirable mechanical properties, leading to the serious stress-shielding problem [1], and the non-degradability of these permanent materials, thus requiring a second surgery for implant removal, as well as the release of toxic ions through corrosion or wear process, such as titanium particles, which could even cause inflammatory osteolysis [2, 3]. Therefore, an urgent necessity for the development of next-generation implant biomaterials arises.

Recently, biodegradable metallic materials have gained growing interest and are intensively investigated, among which magnesium (Mg) and magnesium alloys emerge as a new class of promising candidate [4, 5]. Magnesium exhibits several key advantages with respect to biomedical applications, especially for load-bearing orthopaedic and cardiovascular implants:

i) Most importantly, it owns a natural ability to biodegrade due to corrosion within aqueous substances especially that contain chloride ions. The overall corrosion reaction that magnesium undergoes in aqueous solutions is given below:

Mg + 2H2  Mg(OH)2+ H2 (1)
Mg(OH)2ClMg2+ + 2OH (2)

Thus, it provides a theoretical basis for Mg and Mg alloys as temporary implants to support tissue regeneration and healing by material dissolution/degradation and concurrent implant resorption/replacement with the surrounding tissue.

For orthopaedic internal fixation application, as the mechanical properties of healing bones gradually increase with the fracture recovery, correspondingly, ideal bone implants should possess a decreasing strength change adapted to the healing process. Deploying biodegradable magnesium and magnesium alloys thus offers a great opportunity to achieve synchronized strength change, whereas the mechanical properties of permanent implants (titanium and stainless steels) remain almost constant during the whole healing process, causing stress shielding problem (Fig. 1). Additionally, the biodegradability of magnesium also obviates the need for a second operation to remove implant once the healing process completes, reducing the cost and pain for patients.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mechanical property matching between new bones and implants

In the field of cardiovascular implants, stenting is the mainstay of surgical treatments to rescue the function of diseased coronary arteries [6]. The use of conventional permanent materials, including stainless steel, nickel–titanium alloys, tantalum and nitinol, due to the non-degradability of the materials, results in possible issues such as late restenosis (∼20%), chronic inflammation, mechanical blockages of the ostia of side branches, late development of malapposition leading to ectatic or aneurismal formation [7]. This pushes the development of fully reabsorbable stent as the future trend. Biodegradable Mg and Mg alloys can be used as a short-term structural support and allows for recovery of arteries without leaving behind foreign materials, offering the possibility of enhanced wound healing and reconstruction of vascular compliance while minimizing chronic inflammatory response and reducing the rate of late restenosis.

ii) It exhibits good biosafety and biocompatibility profile. Magnesium is an essential trace element in human body, namely the fourth most abundant mineral, and is necessary as a cofactor in more than 325 different enzymatic reactions, playing an important role in energy metabolism. It is required for the proper functioning of the heart, muscles, nerves, bones and kidneys. Recommended by the WHO, adults need an amount of 280–300 mg daily intake, while 250 mg for children and 80 mg for infants, respectively. Serum magnesium levels can be maintained normal due to the dynamic absorption and excretion equilibrium of magnesium in human body, through gastrointestinal absorption and renal excretion (Fig. 2) [8].

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Distribution of dynamic absorption and excretion equilibrium of Mg in human body [8]

Additionally, the other degradation products H2 is also reported to be beneficial to health, as it has an antioxidant effect, identified as a selective scavenger of hydroxyl radical and peroxynitrite. The degradation products of magnesium can all be metabolized and absorbed by the body, and thus a solid foundation laid for Mg and Mg alloys as biodegradable implant materials regarding biosafety issues.

iii) It possesses superior mechanical properties required to meet loading requirements as for orthopaedic implants. The density, elastic modulus and compressive yield strength of magnesium are quite close to those of natural bones compared with titanium alloys or stainless steels (see Table 1) [9], and thus minimize the level of stress shielding. In the aspect of stent application, magnesium has similar mechanical strength to stainless steel and other stenting metallic materials to provide sufficient radial support, whereas biodegradable polymeric stenting materials (e.g. polylactic acid (PLA)) own much lower radial strength so that thicker stent struts are required. Thanks to these desirable physical and mechanical properties, Mg and Mg alloys are endowed with great potential as ideal temporary implant materials.

Table 1.

Summary of physical and mechanical properties of various implant materials in comparison with natural bone [10]

Characteristics Cortical bone Mg alloy Ti alloy 316L stainless steel
Density (g/cm3) 1.8–2.1 1.74–2.1 4.4–4.5 7.9–8.1
Elastic modulus (GPa) 7–30 44–45 110–117 189–205
Compressive yield strength (MPa) 130–180 130–380 750––1200 170–310

Moreover, magnesium would not interfere with common radiological examinations for post-operative care, such as CT and MRI. These aforementioned desirable properties have led to worldwide attention on Mg-based biomaterials, known as the ‘revolutionizing metallic biomaterial’[10, 11], for tissue engineering and medical devices.

Challenges for the bio-Mg clinical applications

Currently, there still exist several technical challenges impeding the clinical applications of biodegradable Mg and Mg alloys. First, pure magnesium and some magnesium alloys can corrode too quickly under physiological conditions, resulting in early loosening or disintegration of the implants before the tissue has sufficiently healed, as well as the rapid release of hydrogen gas in a short period of time in the corrosion process that is too fast to be dealt with by the host tissue. Secondly, Mg and Mg alloys are highly susceptible to localized and inhomogeneous degradation, leading to local stress concentration and decrease of mechanical strength, consequently subjecting the implants to unexpected fracture way before the anticipated lifetime. Last, the strength and ductility of Mg and Mg alloys are still required to be improved for specific applications so as to achieve optimal in vivo performance. Hence, to develop novel Bio-Mg alloys for medical applications is essential to the ultimate realization of clinical use.

Regarding principles of material design, the following key scientific issues need to be borne in mind:

  1. Biocompatibility and biosafety. Elements such as Al, which are not suitable for biomedical applications in consideration of toxicity, should be avoid for alloying.

  2. Compatible strength and ductility. As for orthopaedic implants, material is required to possess yield strength >200 MPa, elongation >10% and a degradation rate <0.5 mm/a in simulated fluids at 37°C, to ensure an effective lifetime of 90–180 days. While for cardiovascular stents, higher ductility and moderate strength is desirable, namely elongation >20% [12].

  3. Controllable degradation. Most reported Mg alloys are easily subjected to localized corrosion. Nevertheless, uniform and controllable degradation behaviours are crucial for accurate predictions of implant serving lifetime.

These three aspects are highly interrelated with respect to the design and engineering of Mg alloys. Thus, how to choose biocompatible alloying elements to achieve compatible mechanical properties, meanwhile to ensure controllable degradation through alloy composition design and microstructure design and control, has posed a great challenge in the development of novel Bio-Mg.

Research progress in bone implants and cardiovascular stents in situ

Development of novel JDBM Mg alloys

Recently, a new type of patented Mg–Nd–Zn-based Bio-Mg alloys (Jiaoda BioMg, denoted as JDBM) alloy has been developed in Shanghai Jiao Tong University [13–15], using first principal calculations and molecular dynamics simulation, combined with experimentation. In this Bio-Mg alloy series, neodymium was selected as the main alloying element, accompanied with the microalloyed Zn and Zr. Nd is one of light rare earth elements barely shown cytotoxicity, the addition of whom has already exhibited significant strengthening effect in Mg-Nd binary alloys [16], and could greatly slow down galvanic corrosion of matrix. Zn is one of the abundant nutritionally essential elements in the human body, which enhances the ductility and deformability of Mg alloy. Zr is an effective grain-refining agent in Al-free magnesium alloys that contributes to strengthening, with verified biocompatibility in a magnesium alloy [17]. Other than the contribution of the above alloying elements, thermo-mechanical processing, namely hot extrusion, is employed to achieve grain refining, improving mechanical properties and generating residual compressive stresses in the subsurface of Mg alloys to reduce the corrosion rate [18, 19].

As a result, our novel JDBM materials have been proven to be a type of biocompatible magnesium alloys of tunable mechanical properties for different specific applications, with a massive superiority in nanophasic uniform and slow degradation over many commercial available Mg alloys, such as AZ 31 and WE43 (Fig. 3) [13, 14]. So far, mainly two series of JDBM have been developed: (i) JDBM-1 with high strength and moderate ductility for orthopaedic implants. Tensile strength and yield strength = 320–380 MPa, and elongation =8–18%, as shown in Figure 4a. A variety of bone implants have been generated with JDBM-1 material, including bone plates, screws and even porous bone tissue scaffolds (Fig. 5); (ii) JDBM-2 with high ductility and moderate strength for cardiovascular stents (Fig. 6). Tensile strength and yield strength = 180–280 MPa, and elongation =20–32%, as shown in Figure 4b.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Surface morphology and the schematic diagram of the corresponding degradation mechanism of JDBM (a and b), WE43 (c and d) and AZ31 (e and f) alloys. The surface of the new JDBM alloy upon exposure to artificial plasma displays a highly uniformarray of nanopits with typical size <500 nm. In contrast, both WE43 and AZ31 alloys show macroscopic pitting or delamination that dominates the degradation process and results in a fast degradation rate and ultimately structural failure [22]

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Mechanical properties of (a) JDBM-1 with high strength and moderate ductility; and (b) JDBM-2 with high ductility and moderate strength

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Various bone implants fabricated using JDBM-1 alloy, including bone plates, screws and porous bone tissue scaffold

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Cardiovascular stents fabricated using JDBM-2 alloys

JDBM-1 alloy for orthopaedic implants application

Previous studies have shown that JDBM-1 has much lower degradation rate, homogeneous corrosion property and slightly higher cytocompatibility, compared with clinical trial WE 43 (Fig. 7) [13]. Additionally, a bioactive Ca–P coating (brushite, CaHPO4·2H2O) with high bonding strength with substrate over 10 MPa was developed successfully on JDBM-1 alloy through chemical reaction deposition (Fig. 8, further improving the biocorrosion resistance and biocompatibility [20]. Both in vitro and in vivo results confirmed that brushite-coated JDBM-1 revealed adequate biosafety and biocompatibility and presented advantages in osteoconductivity and osteogenesis as bone repair substitutes [20, 21].

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

In vitro corrosion rate measured with immersion test showing a much lower rate of JDBM compared with that of WE43 [23]

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

(a) Macroscopic picture of a brushite-coated JDBM sample, (b) scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the brushite coating on JDBM substrate and (c) cross-section view of the brushite coating [24]

The in vivo experiments with bone plates in New Zealand rabbits up to 18 weeks showed effective biocorrosion resistance of JDBM-1 in the early stage post implantation. At 18 weeks, both JDBM and coated-JDBM plates revealed homogeneous corrosion profile and retained most part of the original strength (52 and 70%, respectively) whereas WE43 and AZ31 exhibited serious localized corrosion with much lower strength left (37%) (Fig. 9).

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

In vivo degradation morphology of bone plates fabricated with (a) JDBM, (b) JDBM covered with brushite coating, (c) AZ31 and (d) WE43, at 18 weeks post-implantation into rabbits

Currently, in vivo implantation in big animal model of goat has being carried out with JDBM-1 bone fixation screws, using commercially available PLA screws as control group. Preliminary results showed a good recovery of the wound by appearance after 40 days post implantation with JDBM-1 screws. CT results at 8 weeks post-implantation verified better biocompatibility and faster bone recovery with JDBM-1, along with hard tissue section evaluations further confirming higher new bone formation ability, compared with those with PLA screws. These promising results indicate that the JDBM-1 alloy possesses great potential for clinical application as orthopaedic implant materials.

JDBM-2 alloy for cardiovascular stents application

Along with the development of JDBM-2 alloy with high ductility and moderate strength, mini-tube processing techniques and surface electropolishing conditions have also been established for the generation of prototype JDBM-2 cardiovascular stents.

A systematic study on the in vitro biocompatibility test of JDBM-2 in comparison with two conventional degradable alloys (WE43 and AZ31) used for vascular stents verifies that JDBM-2 has a minimal negative effect on the HUVEC viability (Fig. 10), growth and proliferation and the JDBM-2 substrate offers a much more favourable surface for endothelial cell adhesion and spreading (Fig. 11) [14]. Furthermore, in vivo experiment with a rabbit model for long-term suggests that the JDBM-2 alloy stent has significantly improved mechanical durability and long-term biocompatibility with no sign of the development of occlusion and neointimal formation in the stent-supported vessel (Fig. 12) [14]. Preliminary results with big animal (pig) model further confirmed the superiority of JDBM-2 stents, showing good mechanical integrity and sufficient supporting function and no obvious degradation or displacement in the follows up of 2 weeks and 3 months with OCT examination, thus is a promising material for future biodegradable vascular stent applications.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Statistical results of cytotoxicity assays using Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) incubated with JDBM, WE43, AZ31 extracts, respectively [25]

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

HUVEC morphology after incubated for 24 h with the extracts of (a) negative control, (b) JDBM-2 and (c) WE43 [25]

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

The as-implanted (a and c) and 16-week follow-up (b and d) angiographic and the corresponding longitudinal reconstruction Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) images of the abdominal aorta after JDBM stent implantation. Note the increased plaque volume and vessel size (arrow heads) at 16 weeks with the nearly complete absence of neointimal hyperplasia [26]

Concluding remarks

Biodegradable Mg-based material is a new research field of both great academic and marketing importance. Though it has shown good application prospect, the following three key scientific issues strength and ductility, controllable degradation and biosafety, are urgently required to be solved. In the middle of the difficulty lies opportunity!

A novel patented Mg-Nd-Zn-Zr alloy series, JDBM, with unique uniform and slow degradation characteristics, has been developed and researched in Shanghai Jiao Tong University, as a potential biodegradable implant material. Both in vitro and in vivo evaluations have verified the superiority of JDBM with respect to degradation rate and mode, biocompatibility and bioactivity, for orthopaedic implants and cardiovascular stents. Our research achievements are expected to be applied to clinic application in the near future of 3–5 years.

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges Prof. G.Y. Yuan, Dr P.H. Fu, Dr Y.X. Wang, Dr X.B. Zhang for the development of Mg alloys, the students J.L. Niu, L. Mao, J. Zhang, Y.J. Shi, H.L. Chen, H.L. Xu, Y. Zong for their contributions, and the clinical collaborators from Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital (Prof. Y. Jiang, Prof. Y.H. He, Dr. Y. Liao and Dr. Y.P. Wang) and Zhongshang Hospital FuDan University (Prof. J.B. Ge and Dr. L. Shen).

Funding

This work is financially supported by Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (11DJ1400300, 14DZ1940800) and Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2012BAI18B01, 2015AA033603).

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

References

  • 1.Kannan MB, Raman RK. In vitro degradation and mechanical integrity of calcium containing magnesium alloy in modified simulated body fluid. Biomaterials 2008;29:2306–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jacobs JJ, Hallab NJ, Skipor AK. et al. Metal degradation products—A cause for concern in metal-metal bearings? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;139–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Puleo DA, Huh WW. Acute toxicity of metal ions in cultures of osteogenic cells derived from bone-marrow stromal cells. J Appl Biomater 1995;6:109–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Witte F, Kaese V, Haferkamp H. et al. In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response. Biomaterials 2005;26:3557–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Witte F, Hort N, Vogt C. et al. Degradable biomaterials based on magnesium corrosion. Current Opin Solid State MaterSci 2008;12:63–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zilberman M, Eberhart RC. Drug-eluting bioresorbable stents for various applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2006;8:153–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Di Mario C, Griffiths H, Goktekin O. Drug-eluting bioabsorbable magnesium stent. J Int Cardiol 2005;17:391–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Akiko Y. Biomedical application of magnesium alloys. J Japan Inst Light Met 2008;58:570–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J. et al. Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review. Biomaterials 2006;27:1728–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Farraro KF, Kim KE, Woo SLY, et al. Revolutionizing orthopaedic biomaterials: the potential of biodegradable and bioresorbable magnesium-based materials for functional tissue engineering. J Biomech 2014;47:1979–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gu XN, Li SS, Li XM, et al. Magnesium based degradable biomaterials: A review. Front Mater Sci 2014;8:200–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ering M, Sillekens WH, Mannens G. et al. Applicability of existing magnesium alloys as biomedical implant materials Magnesium Technology. New York: TMS, 2009, 209–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mao L, Yuan G, Wang S. et al. A novel biodegradable Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy with uniform corrosion behavior in artificial plasma. Mates Lett 2012;88:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mao L, Shen L, Niu J. et al. Nanophasic biodegradation enhances the durability and biocompatibility of magnesium alloys for the next-generation vascular stents. Nanoscale 2013;5:9517–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang XB, Yuan GY, Mao L. et al. Biocorrosion properties of as-extruded Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy compared with commercial AZ31 and WE43 alloys. Mates Lett 2012;66:209–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Feyerabend F, Fischer J, Holtz J. et al. Evaluation of short term effects of rare earth and other elements used in magnesium alloys on primary cells and cell lines. Acta Biomaterialia 2010;6:1834–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ye XY, Chen MF, Yang M. et al. In vitro corrosion resistance and cytocompatibility of nano hydroxyapatite reinforced MgZnZr composites. J Mater Sci 2010;21:1321–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang XB, Yuan GY, Mao L. et al. Effects of extrusion and heat treatment on the mechanical properties and biocorrosion behaviors of a Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012;7:77–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang XB, Yuan GY, Mao L. et al. Microstructure, mechanical properties, biocorrosion behavior, and cytotoxicity of as-extruded Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy with different extrusion ratios. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012;9:153–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Niu JL, Yuan GY, Liao Y. et al. Enhanced biocorrosion resistance and biocompatibility of degradable Mg–Nd–Zn–Zr alloy by brushite coating. Mater Sci Eng C 2013;33:4833–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guan XM, Xiong MP, Zeng FY. et al. Enhancement of Osteogenesis and Biodegradation Control by Brushite Coating on Mg−Nd−Zn−Zr Alloy for Mandibular Bone Repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2014;6:21525–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Regenerative Biomaterials are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES