Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2001 May;APPENDIX 3:Appendix–3F. doi: 10.1002/0471140864.psa03fs13

Protein Precipitation Using Ammonium Sulfate

Paul T Wingfield 1
PMCID: PMC4817497  NIHMSID: NIHMS773093  PMID: 18429073

Abstract

The basic theory of protein precipitation by addition of ammonium sulfate is presented and the most common applications are listed, Tables are provided for calculating the appropriate amount of ammonium sulfate to add to a particular protein solution.

Key terms for indexing: Ammonium sulfate, ammonium sulfate tables, protein concentration, protein purification

BASIC THEORY

The solubility of globular proteins increases upon the addition of salt (<0.15 M), an effect termed salting-in. At higher salt concentrations, protein solubility usually decreases, leading to precipitation; this effect is termed salting-out ((Green and Hughes, 1955). Salts that reduce the solubility of proteins also tend to enhance the stability of the native conformation. In contrast, salting-in ions are usually denaturants.

The mechanism of salting-out is based on preferential solvation due to exclusion of the cosolvent (salt) from the layer of water closely associated with the surface of the protein (hydration layer). The hydration layer, typically 0.3 to 0.4 g water per gram protein (Rupley et al., 1983), plays a critical role in maintaining solubility and the correctly folded native conformation. There are three main protein-water interactions: ion hydration between charged side chains (e.g., Asp, Glu, Lys), hydrogen bonding between polar groups and water (e.g., Ser, Thr, Tyr, and the main chain of all residues), and hydrophobic hydration (Val, Ile, Leu, Phe). In hydrophobic hydration, the configurational freedom of water molecules is reduced in the proximity of apolar residues. This ordering of water molecules results in a loss of entropy and is thus energetically unfavorable. When salt is added to the solution, the surface tension of the water increases, resulting in increased hydrophobic interaction between protein and water. The protein responds to this situation by decreasing its surface area in an attempt to minimize contact with the solvent—as manifested by folding (the folded conformation is more compact than the unfolded one) and then self-association leading to precipitation. Both folding and precipitation free up bound water, increasing the entropy of the system and making these processes energetically favorable. Timasheff and his colleagues provide a detailed discussion of these complex effects (e.g., Kita et al., 1994; Timasheff and Arakawa, 1997).

It should be mentioned that the increase in surface tension of water by salt follows the well-known Hofmeister series, shown below (see Parsegian, 1995, and references therein). Hence, as an approximation, those salts that favor salting-out raise the surface tension of water the highest. As (NH4)2SO4 has much a higher solubility than any of the phosphate salts, it is the reagent of choice for salting-out.

graphic file with name nihms773093f1.jpg

TIPS AND GUIDELINES

  • With solid ammonium sulfate, a mortar and pestle can be used to break up any lumps.

  • Use analytical grade as lower grade material is often contaminated with heavy metals.

  • Addition of ammonium sulfate acidifies the solution so use at least a 50 mM HEPES or Tris buffer etc., 5mM EDTA can also be included.

  • Add solid ammonium sulfate slowly with gentle stirring; allow to dissolve before adding more solid, try to prevent foaming.

  • On-line calculators can be accessed to conveniently determine the amounts of solid ammonium sulfate required to reach a given saturation. For example, EnCor Biotechnology Inc., has an on-line calculator based on the equations given in this appendix: http://www.encorbio.com/protocols/AM-SO4.htm.

  • Ammonium sulfate solution, 4.1M saturated at 25 °C can be purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and other suppliers.

  • Note: In the literature sulfate is often referred to by UK spelling: sulphate.

COMMON APPLICATION

Concentration of Proteins

Because precipitation is due to reduced solubility and not denaturation, pelleted protein can be readily resolubilized using standard buffers. After concentration, the protein is well suited for gel filtration (unit 8.3) whereby the buffer can be exchanged and the remaining ammonium sulfate removed. Alternately, the protein can be dissolved in a nonprecipitating concentration of (NH4)2SO4 (e.g., 1 M) and then applied to a hydrophobic interaction matrix (unit 8.4).

Protein Purification

Practical details of selective precipitation are presented in unit 4.5, and an example in the purification of interleukin 1β is given in unit 6.2 where the protein is fractionated between ~50 – 77% saturation. Low molecular weight proteins, like interleukin-1β, as a rule require higher salt concentration for precipitation than larger molecular proteins, for example, large multiprotein complexes can often be salted out with < 20% saturation. Another example (classic) is the precipitation of IgG from blood sera. The addition of 40 – 45% ammounium sulfate precipitates IgG which can be further purified by anion exchange chromatography. Salt precipitation has been widely used to fractionate membrane proteins (Schagger, 1994). Due to bound lipid and/or detergents, ammonium sulfate precipitates have lower density than protein-only precipitates. During centrifugation, these precipitates will often float to the top of tube rather than pelleting; the use of swing-out rotors is recommended. Crystallization is a traditional method of protein purification. Jakoby (1971) describes a general method that involves extracting (NH4)2SO4-precipitated protein with successively dilute (NH4)2SO4 solutions at low temperature. Although there are several methods for removing contaminating nucleic acids from protein solutions including, for example, addition of 0.1% (w.v) polyethyleneimine, a simple and effective approach is to apply the protein to a small anion exchange column equilibriated with 0.4M ammonium sulfate, where the nucleic acids binds to the column and the protein is collected in the flow-through.

Folding and Stabilization of Protein Structure

As mentioned above, (NH4)2SO4 and other neutral salts stabilize proteins by preferential solvation (Timasheff and Arakawa, 1997). Proteins are often stored in (NH4)2SO4, which inhibits bacterial growth and contaminating protease activities. Protein unfolded by denaturants such as urea can be pushed into native conformations by the addition of (NH4)2SO4 (Mitchinson and Pain, 1986). A practical application is the folding of recombinant proteins. For example, HIV-1 Rev expressed in E. coli was solubilized using urea, purified by ion-exchange chromatography in the presence of urea, then folded by the addition of 0.5 to 1.0 M (NH4)2SO4 (Wingfield et al., 1991).

Basic Calculations

Basic definitions

Percentage (%) saturation concentration of (NH4)2SO4 in solution as % of maximum solubility at the given temperature. For example, at 0°C, a 100% saturated solution is 3.9 M.

Specific volume (sp. vol.) volume occupied by 1 g of (NH4)2SO4 (ml/g) = inverse of density. At 0°C, if 706.8 g of (NH4)2SO4 is added to 1 L of water the volume = 1000 ml + volume occupied by the salt (706.8 × 0.5281 ml) = total volume of 1373.26 ml. The molarity = 3.9 M.

Calculating quantities of (NH4)2SO4 to be added

By weight. The following equation is used to calculate the weight of solid (NH4)2SO4 to be added to 1 liter of solution of initial concentration S1 to produce final saturation S2:

weight(g)=Gsat(S2S1)1(PS2)

where:

Gsat = grams of (NH4)2SO4 contained in 1 liter of saturated solution. For example, at 0°C, Gsat = 515.35 (see Table A.3F.1).

Table A.3F.1.

Density and Molarity of Ammonium Sulfate Solutionsa,b

Temperature (°C) 0 10 20 25
(NH4)2SO4 (g) added to 1 liter of water to give saturated solution 706.8 730.5 755.8 766.8
(NH4)2SO4 (g) per liter saturated solution 515.35 524.60 536.49 541.80
Molarity of saturated solution 3.90 3.97 4.06 4.10
Density (g/ml) 1.2428 1.2436 1.2447 1.2450
Specific volume in saturated solution (ml/g) 0.5281 0.5357 0.5414 0.5435
a

Molecular weight of (NH4)2SO4 = 132.14.

b

Adapted from Dawson et al. (1986).

S1 and S2 are fractions of complete saturation; for example, a 20% saturation is expressed as 0.2.

P=(sp. vol.×Gsat)/1000

For example, P = 0.2722 and 0.2945 at 0°C and 25°C, respectively.

By volume. The following equation is used to calculate volume of saturated (NH4)2SO4 solution to be added to 100 ml of solution to increase saturation from S1 to S2:

volume(ml)=100(S2S1)1S2

For example, to raise 100 ml of 0.2 saturated solution to 0.70 saturation:

100ml(0.2)+xml(1.0)=(100+xml)0.70
20+x=70+0.7x
x=166.66ml

Hence, 166.66 ml of saturated solution is added to 100 ml of 20% saturated solution to give 266.66 ml of 70% saturated solution.

AMMONIUM SULFATE TABLES

The tables shown are taken from Wood (1976). Table A.3F.2 gives the weight of (NH4)2SO4 to be added to a solution to obtain the desired concentration. Table A.3F.3 gives the volume of a 3.8 M solution to add to obtain a desired concentration. Tables A.3F.4 and A.3F.5 give the final volumes after the addition of the solid salt or a 3.8 M solution, respectively. The concentration of (NH4)2SO4 is expressed in molarity (corresponding % saturation is indicated in Table A.3F.2). The data is valid for solutions at 0°C, and the variation of specific volume with concentration is taken into account. For a table referring to solutions at 25°C, see Green and Hughes (1955).

Table A.3F.2.

Grams of Ammonium Sulfate to Add to 1 Liter of Solution at 0°C

Percent
saturation
Initial
molarity
Final molarity
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60 3.80 3.90
0.0 0.00 0.00 26.7 54.0 81.9 111 140 170 202 234 267 302 338 375 413 453 495 539 585 632 682 707
5.1 0.20 0.00 27.0 54.7 83.0 112 142 173 205 238 272 308 344 383 422 464 507 552 599 649 673
10.3 0.40 0.00 27.4 55.4 84.2 114 144 176 209 243 278 314 352 391 432 475 519 566 615 639
15.4 0.60 0.00 27.7 56.2 85.5 116 147 179 213 247 283 321 359 400 442 486 533 581 605
20.5 0.80 0.00 28.1 57.1 87.0 118 150 183 217 252 289 328 368 409 453 499 546 570
25.7 1.00 0.00 28.6 58.1 88.5 120 153 186 221 258 296 335 376 420 465 512 535
30.8 1.20 0.00 29.1 59.1 90.2 122 156 190 226 264 303 343 386 430 477 499
35.9 1.40 0.00 29.6 60.2 91.9 125 159 194 231 270 310 351 395 441 464
41.1 1.60 0.00 30.2 61.4 93.7 127 162 199 236 276 317 360 405 428
46.2 1.80 0.00 30.7 62.6 95.7 130 166 203 242 282 325 369 391
51.3 2.00 0.00 31.3 63.9 97.7 133 170 208 248 290 333 355
56.5 2.20 0.00 32.0 65.2 99.8 136 174 213 254 297 318
61.6 2.40 0.00 32.7 66.7 102 139 178 218 260 281
66.8 2.60 0.00 33.4 68.2 104 142 182 224 244
71.9 2.80 0.00 34.2 69.8 107 146 187 207
77.0 3.00 0.00 35.0 71.5 110 150 169
82.2 3.20 0.00 35.8 73.2 112 132
87.3 3.40 0.00 36.7 75.0 94.0
92.4 3.60 0.00 37.6 56.1
97.6 3.80 0.00 18.1
100.0 3.90 0.00

Table A.3.F.3.

Milliliters of a 3.8 M Ammonium Sulfate Solution to Add to 1 Liter of Solution at 0°C

Initial
molarity
Final molarity
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40
0.00 0.00 55.3 117 185 263 351 452 570 709 875 1077 1330 1655 2088 2693 3600 5111 8134
0.20 0.00 58.4 124 197 281 377 489 621 779 972 1213 1522 1933 2508 3371 4809 7684
0.40 0.00 61.9 132 211 302 408 534 683 866 1094 1387 1777 2322 3140 4503 7228
0.60 0.00 65.9 141 227 327 446 587 760 975 1252 1620 2135 2907 4194 6768
0.80 0.00 70.5 152 246 357 490 652 855 1115 1462 1946 2673 3884 6305
1.00 0.00 75.9 164 268 393 545 735 978 1303 1756 2437 3570 5837
1.20 0.00 82.3 179 295 437 613 840 1143 1565 2199 3255 5366
1.40 0.00 89.7 197 328 492 702 981 1372 1959 2936 4891
1.60 0.00 98.7 219 369 562 819 1179 1718 2616 4412
1.80 0.00 110 247 423 657 984 1475 2294 3931
2.00 0.00 124 282 494 789 1232 1971 3447
2.20 0.00 141 330 593 988 1645 2961
2.40 0.00 165 396 742 1319 2472
2.60 0.00 198 496 991 1981
2.80 0.00 248 662 1489
3.00 0.00 332 994
3.20 0.00 498
3.40 0.00

Table A.3.F.4.

Final Volume in Millimeters After Addition of Solid Ammonium Sulfate to 1 Liter of Solution at 0°C

Initial
molarity
Final molarity
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60 3.80 3.90
0.00 1000 1010 1023 1033 1046 1060 1074 1090 1106 1123 1142 1161 1181 1203 1225 1249 1275 1301 1329 1359 1373
0.20 1000 1011 1023 1035 1049 1063 1079 1095 1112 1130 1149 1169 1191 1213 1237 1262 1288 1316 1345 1359
0.40 1000 1012 1024 1037 1052 1067 1083 1100 1118 1137 1157 1178 1200 1223 1248 1274 1301 1330 1344
0.60 1000 1012 1025 1039 1054 1070 1087 1105 1124 1143 1164 1186 1209 1233 1259 1286 1315 1329
0.80 1000 1013 1027 1042 1057 1074 1091 1110 1129 1150 1172 1194 1218 1244 1271 1299 1313
1.00 1000 1014 1028 1044 1060 1077 1096 1115 1135 1156 1179 1203 1228 1254 1282 1296
1.20 1000 1014 1030 1046 1063 1081 1100 1120 1141 1163 1187 1211 1237 1265 1278
1.40 1000 1015 1031 1048 1065 1084 1104 1125 1147 1170 1194 1220 1247 1260
1.60 1000 1016 1032 1050 1068 1088 1108 1130 1152 1176 1202 1228 1242
1.80 1000 1016 1033 1052 1071 1091 1112 1135 1158 1183 1209 1222
2.00 1000 1017 1035 1054 1073 1094 1116 1140 1164 1190 1203
2.20 1000 1018 1036 1056 1076 1098 1121 1145 1170 1183
2.40 1000 1018 1037 1058 1079 1101 1125 1150 1162
2.60 1000 1019 1039 1060 1082 1105 1129 1142
2.80 1000 1019 1040 1062 1085 1109 1121
3.00 1000 1020 1041 1064 1087 1099
3.20 1000 1021 1043 1066 1077
3.40 1000 1022 1044 1055
3.60 1000 1022 1033
3.80 1000 1011
3.90 1000

Table A.3.F.5.

Final Volume in Millimeters After Addition of 3.8 M Ammonium Sulfate Solution to 1 Liter of Solution at 0°C

Initial
Molarity
Final molarity
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40
0.00 1000 1051 1109 1174 1248 1333 1432 1547 1683 1847 2047 2298 2621 3051 3654 4560 6070 9091
0.20 1000 1055 1117 1187 1268 1362 1471 1601 1757 1947 2186 2493 2902 3476 4337 5773 8646
0.40 1000 1059 1126 1202 1291 1394 1517 1665 1846 2072 2363 2751 3294 4111 5472 8196
0.60 1000 1063 1135 1219 1317 1433 1573 1743 1957 2232 2598 3112 3883 5168 7741
0.80 1000 1068 1147 1239 1348 1479 1640 1841 2099 2444 2927 3652 4862 7282
1.00 1000 1074 1160 1262 1385 1535 1723 1966 2289 2741 3420 4552 6818
1.20 1000 1080 1176 1290 1430 1605 1831 2131 2553 3185 4240 6350
1.40 1000 1088 1194 1324 1486 1694 1973 2363 2948 3924 5878
1.60 1000 1097 1216 1365 1557 1813 2171 2709 3606 5402
1.80 1000 1108 1244 1419 1652 1979 2469 3287 4922
2.00 1000 1122 1280 1491 1785 2227 2965 4441
2.20 1000 1141 1328 1590 1984 2642 3956
2.40 1000 1164 1394 1740 2316 3469
2.60 1000 1198 1494 1989 2979
2.80 1000 1248 1661 2488
3.00 1000 1331 1994
3.20 1000 1498
3.40 1000

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Dawson RMC, Elliot DC, Elliot WH, Jones KM. Data for Biochemical Research. 3rd. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press; 1986. p. 537. [Google Scholar]
  2. Green AA, Hughes WL. Protein solubility on the basis of solubility in aqueous solutions of salts and organic solvents. Methods Enzymol. 1955;1:67–90. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jakoby WB. Crystallization as a purification technique. Methods Enzymol. 1971;22:248–252. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kita Y, Arakawa T, Lin T-Y, Timasheff S. Contribution of the surface free energy perturbations to protein-solvent interactions. Biochemistry. 1994;33:1517–1589. doi: 10.1021/bi00254a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mitchinson C, Pain RH. The effect of sulphate and urea on the stability and reversible unfolding of β-lactamase from Staphylococcus aureus. J. Mol. Biol. 1986;184:331–342. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90384-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Parsegian VA. Hopes for Hofmeister. Nature. 1995;378:335–336. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rupley JA, Gratton E, Careri G. Water and globular proteins. Trend Biochem. Sci. 1983;8:18–22. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schagger H. Chromatographic techniques and basic operations in membrane protein purification. In: von Jagow G, Schagger H, editors. A Practical Guide to Membrane Protein Purification. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994. pp. 23–57. [Google Scholar]
  9. Timasheff SN, Arakawa T. membrane protein purification Stabilization of protein structure by solvents. In: Creighton TE, editor. Protein Structure: A Practical Approach. 2nd. Oxford: IRL Press at Oxford University Press; 1997. pp. 349–364. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wingfield PT, Stahl SJ, Payton MA, Vankatesan S, Misra M, Steven AC. HIV-1 Rev expressed in recombinant Escherichia coli: Purification, polymerization and conformational properties. Biochemistry. 1991;30:7527–7534. doi: 10.1021/bi00244a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wood WI. Tables for the preparation of ammonium sulfate solutions. Anal. Biochem. 1976;73:250–257. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90165-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

KEY REFERENCE

  1. Wood 1976. See above.

RESOURCES