Abstract
Background
During Trypanosoma cruzi infection, macrophages produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in a process called respiratory burst. Several works have aimed to elucidate the role of ROS during T. cruzi infection and the results obtained are sometimes contradictory. T. cruzi has a highly efficiently regulated antioxidant machinery to deal with the oxidative burst, but the parasite macromolecules, particularly DNA, may still suffer oxidative damage. Guanine (G) is the most vulnerable base and its oxidation results in formation of 8-oxoG, a cellular marker of oxidative stress.
Methodology/Principal Findings
In order to investigate the contribution of ROS in T. cruzi survival and infection, we utilized mice deficient in the gp91phox (Phox KO) subunit of NADPH oxidase and parasites that overexpress the enzyme EcMutT (from Escherichia coli) or TcMTH (from T. cruzi), which is responsible for removing 8-oxo-dGTP from the nucleotide pool. The modified parasites presented enhanced replication inside murine inflammatory macrophages from C57BL/6 WT mice when compared with control parasites. Interestingly, when Phox KO macrophages were infected with these parasites, we observed a decreased number of all parasites when compared with macrophages from C57BL/6 WT. Scavengers for ROS also decreased parasite growth in WT macrophages. In addition, treatment of macrophages or parasites with hydrogen peroxide increased parasite replication in Phox KO mice and in vivo.
Conclusions
Our results indicate a paradoxical role for ROS since modified parasites multiply better inside macrophages, but proliferation is significantly reduced when ROS is removed from the host cell. Our findings suggest that ROS can work like a signaling molecule, contributing to T. cruzi growth inside the cells.
Author Summary
The parasite Trypanosoma cruzi is the causative agent of Chagas’ disease, which affects 10 million people, mainly in Latin American. Macrophages are one of the first cellular actors facing the invasion of pathogens and during T. cruzi infection, produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). To deal with oxidative stress, T. cruzi has an antioxidant machinery and, to repair DNA damage triggered by ROS, this parasite possesses enzymes of the oxidized guanine DNA repair system. The understanding of the role of ROS in the infection by T. cruzi can provide us with good insights on T. cruzi biology and virulence. While some studies suggest that ROS is related to parasite control, others have demonstrated that ROS is important for proliferation of this parasite. To investigate the contribution of ROS in T. cruzi infection, we utilized mice deficient in the production of ROS (Phox KO) and parasites that overexpress the enzymes related to DNA repair. Our results show that ROS is not only important for the battle against pathogens, but suggest that ROS can also work as a signal that contributes to the growth of this parasite.
Introduction
Macrophages are one of the first lines of defense against intracellular pathogens [1]. During Trypanosoma cruzi infection, these cells are activated to produce ROS, a process called respiratory burst [2–4]. The detection of infectious agents leads to activation of the membrane bound NADPH oxidase, a multi-subunit complex that utilizes NAD(P)H as an electron donor to reduce oxygen (O2) to superoxide (O2●−) within the phagosome. The anionic nature of O2●− restricts its diffusion through membranes, confining its actions to the site of formation. Superoxide radicals can spontaneously or enzymatically dismutate into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), an oxidant with higher diffusional capacity. Metal transition ions in the presence of H2O2 can generate hydroxyl radical (●OH), an oxidant that, owing to its high reactivity, encloses poor selectivity against cellular targets and may not be highly toxic [5,6]. Alternatively, O2●− may react with iNOS-derived nitric oxide (●NO) in a diffusion-controlled reaction, to produce peroxynitrite (ONOO−), a cytotoxic effector molecule against T. cruzi [4,7,8].
T. cruzi has a highly efficiently regulated antioxidant machinery to deal with the oxidative burst and adapts to the conditions imposed by their digenetic life cycle [9,10]. There are different pathways to detoxify hydroperoxides, within different substrate specificities and in different compartments such as mitochondria, glycosome, endoplasmic reticulum and cytosol [11]. In this intricate network, reducing equivalents from NADPH, produced by the pentose phosphate pathway, are delivered to a variety of detoxification enzymes. This reducing equivalents are delivered from trypanothione (T(SH)2) to tryparedoxin (TXN) and glutathione (GSH), which transfers them to the several peroxidases. T(SH)2 is maintained in its reduced state by the NADPH-dependent trypanothine reductase (TcTR) [12]. Several peroxidases have been characterized: two cysteine-dependent glutathione peroxidases, one ascorbate-dependent hemoperoxidase (TcAPX) and two tryparedoxin peroxidases [13–17]. The tryparedoxin peroxidases differ in their subcellular location: a cytosolic and a mitochondrial form (TcCPX and TcMPX, respectively) and catalyze the reduction of H2O2, small-chain organic hydroperoxides and ONOO− [11,18]. In the endoplasmic reticulum, TcAPX and glutathione-dependent peroxidase II (GPX-II) metabolize H2O2 and lipid hydroperoxides respectively [16,19]. There is growing evidence that this antioxidant network may play an important role in parasite virulence and success of infection [4,11,20–22].
Despite this efficient antioxidant system, the parasite macromolecules, particularly DNA, may still suffer oxidative damage that may be deleterious if not repaired. Due to its low redox potential, guanine (G) is the most vulnerable base. The oxidation of guanine results in formation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG), a cellular marker of oxidative stress [23]. When 8-oxoG assumes syn configuration, it is particularly mutagenic because it functionally mimics thymine. When 8-oxoG is inserted during DNA replication, it can generate double-strand breaks, making this lesion deleterious [24,25]. To repair lesions caused by 8-oxoG, most organisms possess the oxidized guanine (GO) DNA repair system (GO system). This repair pathway is composed by the enzymes MutT, MutY and MutM in bacteria [26] and by corresponding enzymes MTH1, MUTYH and OGG1 in humans [27]. Studies on T. cruzi genome have demonstrated that this parasite has homologs to the enzymes OGG1, MUTYH [28] and MutT [29]. MutM excises the oxidized base from 8-oxoG:C base pairs and the MutY excises adenine where it has been erroneously incorporated opposite to unrepaired 8-oxoG during replication [27]. The MutT enzyme catalyzes the hydrolysis of 8-oxo-dGTP in the nucleotide pool, by substitution at the rarely attacked beta-P, to yield monophosphate nucleotide and pyrophosphate. This prevents errors in DNA replication, since the monophosphate form cannot be incorporated into nascent DNA [30,31].
Although ROS is clearly involved in control of several infections, increasing evidences point to a role of ROS as promoters of infection [32]. Several works have aimed at elucidating the role of reactive oxygen species during T. cruzi infection and the results obtained are sometimes contradictory. Although some studies have suggested that ROS produced during the respiratory burst have an important role in T. cruzi control [2,4,10,33], other authors have demonstrated that ROS is important to cellular signaling and proliferation of this parasite [11,34–36]. Studies performed with bacteria [37,38], fungus [39], viruses [40–42] and Leishmania [43] also associated ROS and parasite proliferation. In order to investigate the contribution of ROS in T. cruzi infection, we utilized mice deficient in the gp91phox (Phox KO) subunit of NADPH oxidase [44] and parasites that overexpress the enzyme EcMutT or TcMTH and are more resistant to DNA damage caused by ROS (parasites with the E. coli mutT gene and parasites that overexpresses TcMTH gene, a T. cruzi MutT homolog) [29]. We found that modified parasites multiply better inside macrophages than wild type, but their proliferation is significantly reduced when ROS production is inhibited in host cell. Our results suggest that low concentration of ROS may work like a signaling molecule, contributing to growth of T. cruzi inside the cells in vitro and increasing the levels of parasitemia in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
This study was conducted in strict accordance with the recommendations in Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Brazilian National Council of Animal Experimentation (http://www.cobea.org.br/) and the Federal Law 11.794 (October 8, 2008). All animals were handled in strict accordance with good animal practice as defined by the Internal Ethics Committee in Animal Experimentation (CETEA) of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The protocol number 214/11 was approved by CETEA.
Parasites
T. cruzi epimastigotes (CLBrener, wild-type) were cultured at 28°C in BHI (brain heart infusion) medium. Parasites overexpressing EcMutT, TcMTH and parasites transfected with the empty vector pROCK (TcROCK) were obtained as described previously [29,45]. Transformed cells were cultured in BHI medium containing 250 μg·ml−1 of hygromycin (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). T. cruzi trypomastigotes were obtained from the supernatant of infected mono layers of LLC-MK2 cell cultures (grown in 2% FBS, 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 2 mM glutamine supplemented DMEM (Dulbecco´s Modified Eagle´s Medium, Sigma Aldrich) and purified by incubation of the pellet for 2 hours at 37°C, followed by collection of motile infective trypomastigotes in the supernatant. This project was approved by National Technical Biosafety Commission (CTNBio) under the process number: 01200.003883/97-02.
Animals
Four- to 8-week-old male and female C57BL/6 mice were obtained from CEBIO (Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil). Phox KO [44] and IFN-γ KO [46] mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Glenville, NJ, USA). Mice were kept in conventional conditions with barriers, controlled light cycle and controlled temperature. Animals were fed a commercial diet for rodents (Labina, Purina, SP, Brazil) ad libitum.
In vitro assays for parasite burden
The macrophages used in this study were isolated from the peritoneal cavity of mice 4 days after injection of 2 mL of 3% thioglycollate medium (BD, Le Pont de Claix, France) into the peritoneal cavity. After this time, mice were euthanized and the peritoneum cells were harvested by repeated cycles of aspiration and re-injection with 10 ml of cold PBS in 10ml syringe with a 24G needle. More than 80% of the cells harvested were macrophages. The cells were centrifuged at 4°C, 1,500 g for 10 minutes and re-suspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Cultilab, Campinas, SP, Brazil), 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 2mM glutamine. Macrophages were counted in a hemocytometer prior to seeding 5x105 or 1x106 cells into each well of a 24-well or 72-well plate respectively and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 2 hours. The parasites were purified, counted and diluted in DMEM medium, and infection was performed for 2 hours, at a five-parasite-to-one-macrophage ratio. Immediately after macrophage infection, the cells were washed four times with phosphate-buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.3) to remove extracellular parasites. The cells were fixed or reincubated with medium for 48 and 72 hours before fixation with methanol. Coverslips with attached macrophages were stained with Panótico (Laborclin, Pinhais, PR, Brazil) and a minimum of 300 macrophages per coverslip were counted. The results were expressed as an infection index ([percentage of infected macrophages x number of amastigotes]/total number of macrophage). Cells from 96 well plates were used to count released parasites in the supernatant (3–7 days after infection). The following drugs were used in these assays: apocynin (APO) (300μM; Sigma-Aldrich); N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) (1mM; Sigma-Aldrich); H2O2 (100 μM); superoxide dismutase–polyethylene glycol (SOD) (25 U/well, Sigma-Aldrich) and catalase–polyethylene glycol (CAT) (40 U/well, Sigma-Aldrich). Drugs were added to the cells 30 minutes (H2O2) or 2 hours (apocynin, catalase, NAC, SOD-PEG) before and immediately after infection. Parasites were treated with 100μM H2O2 for 30 minutes before the infection.
ROS detection
Luminometry assays were performed to evaluate the production of ROS by macrophages. The cells, obtained as described before, were centrifuged at 4°C, 1,500 g for 10 minutes, and resuspended in complete RPMI without phenol red. Macrophages (1 x 106 cells/well) were plated in 96 well opaque plates (NUNC, Rochester, NY, USA) and pre-incubated with 300μM of APO, 1mM of NAC, 25u of SOD or 40u of CAT for 2 hours. After this time, 0.05 mM luminol (5-Amino-2,3-dihydro-1,4-phthalazinedione; Sigma-Aldrich) and T. cruzi trypomastigotes (Y strain) in the proportion of 10 parasites to 1 macrophage were added in each well. Measurements were taken for 120 minutes with two-minute interval between measurements. Production of ROS was assayed by the light intensity generated by the reaction between ROS and luminol and expressed as relative light units.
●NO production by macrophages
Macrophage iNOS was induced by pre-incubating the cells with 100 units/mL of IFN-γ (BD, San Diego, CA, USA) and 10μg/mL of LPS (Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA) for 2 hours. Then, control and IFN-γ/LPS-activated macrophages were infected with T. cruzi trypomastigotes (5 parasites: 1 host cell) for 2 hours and washed with phosphate-buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.3) to remove extracellular parasites. Following incubation (for 48 h), supernatants were collected and the concentration of nitrite was determined spectrophotometrically (Microplate Spectrophotometer System, model SPECTRAmax 340, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at 540nm using the Griess method with NaNO2 as the standard [47].
DHR (dihydrorhodamine) oxidation
T. cruzi epimastigotes (TcWT, EcMutT and TcMTH) were treated with 200μM of H2O2 for 30 minutes. After incubation, cells were centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min at 25°C and washed twice in DPBS (Dulbecco’s PBS, pH 7.3; Sigma-Aldrich). Parasites (1 × 109 cells/mL) were incubated for 30 min at 28°C in DPBS containing 50 μM DHR (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA). After incubation, cells were centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min at 25°C and washed twice in DPBS in order to eliminate non-incorporated DHR. Detection of intracellular Rhodamine 123 (RH 123), the oxidation product of DHR, was performed after exposure to the 0.1mM peroxynitrite donor 3-morpholinosydnonimine hydrochloride (SIN-1, Sigma-Aldrich). The detection of intracellular RH 123 was performed using a FACS-Calibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ, USA).
Detection of antioxidants enzymes in parasites
Epimastigotes (3x108 cells) were replicated 3 days consecutively to maintain parasites in the logarithmic phase of growth and after this process were incubated with 50μM H2O2 for 30 minutes, washed twice and prepared for determination of antioxidant enzyme contents. Parasites (3x108 cells) were centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min at 25°C, washed three times in DPBS pH 7.3, re-suspended in 250 μL lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA and 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100) and incubated on ice for 15 min. Cell extracts were clarified (13,000 g for 30 min at 4°C) and supernatants supplemented with loading buffer (30 mM Tris–HCl, pH 6.6, 1% (w/v) SDS and 5% (v/v) glycerol) were stored at -80°C until use. Protein extracts (50 μg), were resolved by 15% SDS–PAGE and then blotted into nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-C extra, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA). After transfer, proteins were stained with Ponceau-S solution (Aplichem, Daermstadt, Germany) and blocked using 3% dry milk in PBS for 1 h at 25°C. Membranes were then probed with anti-TcCPX (1:2000) diluted in PBS 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 for 1 h at 25°C following 1 h incubation with anti-rabbit IRE-800 (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) diluted 1:10.000 in PBS 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20. Membranes were imaged with the LI-COR Odyssey Infrared Imaging System. Protein content relative to total protein loaded (Ponceau-S staining [48]) in the different extracts analyzed was determined by densitometric techniques using ImageJ (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Results are expressed as relative enzyme content respect to total protein content [20]. To determinate the quantity of TcMPX and TcSODB, the parasites were fixed in paraformaldehyde (4% v/v in PBS) and incubated with anti-TcMPX, anti-SODB, and anti-cruzipain (1:2000) for 1 hour at 37°C. The parasites were washed and incubated for 1 h with Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA) diluted 1:10,000, washed again and analyzed by flow cytometer (FACS-Calibur).
8-oxoG assay
Streptavidin has previously been shown to bind with high specificity to 8-oxoG [49,50] and was therefore used for the 8-oxoG measurements. Epimastigotes and amastigotes parasites were treated with H2O2 for 30 minutes, fixed in paraformaldehyde (2% v/v in PBS) at 25°C for 15 min and thereafter incubated for 15 min in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 v/v. Cells were then incubated with Alexa488-conjugated streptavidin (Invitrogen) (1:100) in PBS for 1 h at 37°C and evaluated by flow cytometer (FACS-Calibur).
In vivo infection experiments
T. cruzi trypomastigotes were maintained by blood passage in IFN-γ KO (TcWT and TcMTH strain) or Swiss (Y strain) mice every 7 or 9 days respectively. Trypomastigotes were obtained from heparinized blood, counted and used to infection. In some experiments, blood parasites (Y strain) were treated with 100μM H2O2 for 30 minutes before the infection. Experimental infection was performed in C57BL/6 WT and Phox KO mice by intraperitoneal injection of 106 TcWT, TcMTH or Y strain blood trypomastigotes. Parasitemia was assessed by counting trypomastigotes in 5 μL of tail vein blood, every day from the 3rd day post-infection until the time at which the parasites became undetectable. The number of parasites per mL was calculated as previously described [51]. Mortality of infected mice was monitored daily.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis in this work was performed using the GraphPad Prism 5.0 program (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and all experiments were repeated at least three times. Data were analyzed for significant differences using ANOVA, and differences between groups were assessed with Bonferroni post-test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
T. cruzi triggers ROS production by macrophages
Internalization of T. cruzi trypomastigotes by macrophages triggers the assembly of the NADPH oxidase complex to yield O2●− [4]. To establish that infection promotes respiratory burst in our conditions, we performed chemiluminescence experiments using luminol which can serve as a probe for O2●− and ONOO− [4]. Infection-increased chemiluminescence triggered by parasites was almost twice that observed with non-infected cells (Fig 1). Luminol chemiluminescence increase was not detected when we performed these experiments in Phox KO macrophages, due to the lack of phagocyte NADPH oxidase (phox) activation and thus O2●− production (Fig 1A and 1C). As expected, pretreatment of macrophages with the phox inhibitor apocynin, a compound that prevents p47phox subunit translocation and therefore assembly of the enzyme complex, prevented the increase in ROS induced by infection, and brought chemiluminescence values down, similarly to Phox KO macrophages (Fig 1A and 1B). Addition of the antioxidants NAC, SOD and CAT also reduced chemiluminescence intensity (Fig 1B and 1D). Once determined in our experimental setup that T. cruzi could stimulate ROS production by macrophages, we proceeded to investigate if oxidative stress would affect the course of infection.
Parasites with enhanced 8-oxo-dGTP pyrophosphohydrolase activity presented improved growth in macrophage cultures
To investigate the importance of oxidative stress on the success of infection of macrophages with T. cruzi, we used parasites that over-express EcMutT enzyme and are more resistant to DNA damage by the oxidation of guanine [29]. To investigate the influence of over-expression of MutT/MTH on T. cruzi invasion process in host cells, macrophages were exposed to parasites for two hours, washed to eliminate extracellular parasites, and fixed. EcMutT heterologous expression does not affect the invasion process (Fig 2A, 2B and 2C). The number of internalized trypomastigotes (Fig 2A) and the number of infected macrophages (Fig 2B) was similar between the two populations of parasites. However, after 48 hours, the number of infected macrophages (Fig 2B) and the number of amastigotes per macrophage (Fig 2A) was elevated for EcMutT parasites in comparison with TcWT parasites. To better express the obtained data the infection index was determined, considering simultaneously the number of infected macrophages and the number of amastigotes in relation to total macrophages. The infection index shows that EcMutT presented increased replication inside murine inflammatory macrophages when compared with wild-type parasites (Fig 2C). This enhanced replication of EcMutT parasites inside macrophages was corroborated by counting the number of trypomastigotes released at the supernatant of infected cells (Fig 2D). Hence, removal of 8-oxo-dGTP from the nucleotide pool increased the success of T. cruzi inside murine macrophages. A replicate of this experiment is presented in S1 Fig.
TcMTH and EcMutT parasites effectively decreased peroxynitrite-dependent intracellular DHR oxidation and show increase in antioxidant enzyme expression
EcMutT parasites express E. coli MutT enzyme, whereas TcMTH parasites overexpress a T. cruzi MutT homolog [29]. Both parasites multiply better in macrophages than wild-type (TcWT) and the wild-type parasite transfected with the empty vector pROCK (TcROCK) (Fig 2 and [29]). To determine if EcMutT and TcMTH are resistant to oxidative stress and what would be the mechanism for this resistance, we evaluated DHR oxidation by flow cytometry in parasites exposed to peroxynitrite donor, SIN-1. Oxidation of the DHR loaded into epimastigotes into fluorescent rhodamine 123 indicates that SIN-1 reaches the parasite cytosol (Fig 3A). The highest intracellular DHR oxidation yield was obtained when TcWT epimastigotes were pre-incubated with H2O2. DHR oxidation was not increased in TcMTH and EcMutT pre-incubated with hydrogen peroxide and further challenged with peroxynitrite (Fig 3A). We observed that pre-conditioning with H2O2 did not promote increase in expression of cytosolic tryparedoxin peroxidase (Fig 3B and S2 Fig gel), but increases expression of mitochondrial tryparedoxin peroxidase (Fig 3C and [29]) in both TcWT and TcMTH. Interestingly, EcMutT over-expressed cytosolic tryparedoxin peroxidase. Superoxide dismutase B (Fig 3D) was similar among parasites and after pre-treatment with H2O2. Cruzipain expression was used as control (Fig 3E). Treatment with H2O2 did not alter parasite viability (S3 Fig).
MTH prevents 8-oxo-dGTP incorporation into DNA
We had already demonstrated that MutT/MTH-expressing cells contained fewer nuclear DNA lesions [29]. We now evaluated the accumulation of 8-oxoG in DNA after parasite exposure to H2O2. The modified base was detected using streptavidin conjugated with Alexa-488 by flow cytometer. We observed an increase of 8-oxoG in DNA after H2O2 treatment in TcWT epimastigotes. On the other hand, TcMTH epimastigotes did not show increased 8-oxoG in DNA after H2O2 treatment, demonstrating the functional activity of the MTH enzyme in the T. cruzi over-expressers (Fig 4).
Phox KO macrophages display reduced parasitism
Our results so far indicate that the over-expression of genes related to repair of oxidative damage favors the growth of parasites inside macrophages. To understand better the role of ROS in T. cruzi infection, we infected macrophages from Phox KO mice. Macrophages from these mice produced less ROS than cells from C57BL/6 WT mice upon infection (Fig 1A and 1C). Phox KO macrophages showed reduced parasitism, when infected with Y (Fig 5A and 5B) and CL Brenner (Fig 5C and 5D) strains of T. cruzi, as compared to C57BL/6 WT macrophages. After 48 hours of infection with Y strain, the number of parasites was increased in C57BL/6 WT macrophages, but was reduced in Phox KO macrophages (Fig 5A). In addition, the number of trypomastigotes released in the supernatant of C57BL/6 WT infected macrophages was greater than in Phox KO macrophages after infection with the Y strain (Fig 5B). The same result was obtained with the CL Brenner strain of T. cruzi (Fig 5C and 5D). We did not observe significant differences in ●NO production between Phox KO and C57BL/6 WT macrophages. In both cells, infection with T. cruzi did not induce the production of ●NO, which was similar to basal levels obtained by non-infected cells. The treatment with IFN-γ/LPS induced significant amounts of ●NO both in Phox KO and C57BL/6 WT macrophages. ●NO production was not different between Phox KO and C57BL/6 WT submitted to the same treatment. Additionally, ●NO production by previously stimulated cells was increased by T. cruzi infection (Fig 6).
The inhibition of ROS production by macrophages also impairs T. cruzi proliferation
Phox KO macrophages showed reduced parasitism when compared with C57BL/6 WT macrophages. Our next step was to investigate if ROS were responsible for the lack of growth in Phox KO macrophages. Thus, we inhibited ROS production by C57BL/6 WT macrophages using different antioxidants. Pre-treatment with anti-oxidants was performed in order to ensure the status of the macrophage at the time of infection. The antioxidants SOD-PEG, CAT-PEG, NAC, and apocynin all reduced parasitism in C57BL/6 WT macrophages. This inhibition was more striking when we infected macrophages with TcMTH, since the levels of infection obtained with this parasite were greater and easily visualized after 48 hours (Fig 7A and 7B). When we observe the number of trypomastigotes released in the supernatant, the differences in infection are still more striking, for both TcWT and TcMTH. The number of trypomastigotes released in the supernatant of infected macrophages is reduced after treatment with apocynin (Fig 7E). The treatment of macrophages with NAC and apocynin also reduced the parasitism of the cells after infection with Y strain (Fig 7C and 7D).
T. cruzi needs a signal provided by ROS to replicate efficiently
Our results suggest that exposure to ROS promotes parasite replication. Some works have demonstrated that ROS could act as signal molecules to cells [11,36]. We propose that T. cruzi needs a signal provided by ROS produced by macrophages to thrive in this host cell. To test this hypothesis, we treated Phox KO macrophages with H2O2 before and after infection, and evaluated the infection index. We also treated NAC-treated C57BL/6 WT macrophages with H2O2. In both cases, the infection index was increased after treatment with H2O2 (Fig 8A). To clarify further this issue, we treated T. cruzi with H2O2 30 minutes before infection. Our results show that parasites treated with H2O2 can infect Phox KO macrophages similarly to C57BL/6 WT macrophages (Fig 8B). In addition, treatment of parasites with H2O2 did not affect infection of C57BL/6 WT macrophages (Fig 8B). The results displayed in Fig 8A differ slightly from the ones presented in Fig 7, in that TcMTH parasites grew better in Phox KO macrophages than TcWT. This result was not repetitive, that is, in some experiments we observed this difference and in others we did not. The reason for the discrepancy is not clear to us at this point, but may be due to differences among parasite cultures obtained in different days. However, consistently parasites grew better in WT macrophages than in Phox KO macrophages, and TcMTH grew better than TcWT in WT machrophages.
Lower concentrations of ROS promote parasite increase in macrophages and mice
So far, our results seem paradoxical: oxidative-stress-resistant parasites multiplied better inside macrophages, but cells deficient in ROS production did not sustained T. cruzi infection. There is a broad response to oxidants in cells: after exposure to a relatively high concentration of ROS, oxidative stress damage generally occurs, while lower concentrations can exert important physiological roles in cellular signaling and proliferation [11]. Thus, we treated parasites with different concentrations of H2O2 and used these parasites to infect macrophages and mice. We found no differences in infection index of C57BL/6 macrophages using up to 200μM H2O2 (Fig 9A). However, in a higher concentration (300 μM) H2O2 was toxic to parasites. Lower concentrations of H2O2 (50μM and 100μM) promoted replication of parasites in Phox KO macrophages, while 200μM H2O2 brought the parasitism back down, and 300 μM H2O2 was also toxic to parasites in Phox KO macrophages. Our next step was to evaluate if the treatment of the parasite with H2O2 could affect T. cruzi capacity to infect mice. We treated blood trypomastigotes of the Y strain of T. cruzi with 100μM of H2O2 for 30 minutes, infected C57BL/6 WT mice by intraperitoneal injection of 103 blood trypomastigotes and followed the course of infection. Our results indicate that C57BL/6 WT mice infected with treated parasites presented significantly higher parasitemia eight days after infection, compared with animals infected with control non treated parasites (Fig 9B). Our results suggest that the lower concentrations of ROS used contribute to growth of the parasite inside the cells, working like signaling molecules to the parasite.
In vivo infections with genetically modified parasites
To investigate whether the increase in the intracellular growth rate observed for the EcMutT parasites would also affect the course of infection in vivo, C57BL/6 WT and Phox KO mice were infected with one million TcWT or TcMTH, and parasitemia was evaluated from day 3 post-infection. The data obtained revealed that TcMTH-infected mice presented significantly higher parasitemia compared with animals infected with TcWT parasites and this difference was more prominent at 5 days post-infection (Fig 10A). This result corroborates the result obtained when the infection was performed in Swiss mice [29]. In addition, no difference in parasitemia was found between mouse strains. C57BL/6 WT and Phox KO mice displayed similar parasitemia, which peaked around 5 days post-infection (Fig 10A) and was subsequently controlled. However, mice deficient in functional NADPH oxidase do not survive infection (Fig 10B). While C57BL/6 WT mice presented 100% of survival after day 40 of infection, Phox KO animals exhibited high mortality when compared to C57BL/6 WT, starting at day 9 and reaching 100% mortality by 12 days of infection (Fig 10B and as previously published for the Y strain, [52]).
Discussion
Oxidative stress, resultant from a deregulated ROS production, has been involved in pathogenesis of several diseases [53,53–55]. On the other hand, in higher eukaryotic cells, reactive oxygen species (ROS) recently emerged as important players in cellular signaling involved in cell growth and differentiation [56]. The regulated increase in free radicals in a temporary imbalance represents the physiological basis for redox regulation [57] and, in this case, ROS can act as secondary messengers in the intracellular signal transduction pathways [56,58,59]. In this paper, we show dual role for reactive oxygen species during infection with T. cruzi.
ROS: Friend or foe?
In agreement with earlier observations in higher eukaryotes [60,61] some authors have pointed evidences for a role of ROS in growth and signaling events of pathogens [11,38,40–42]. In Leishmania, iron uptake controls H2O2 generation, which can act as a signaling molecule, initiating differentiation of promastigotes into infective amastigotes [43]. Sub-lethal doses of the superoxide-generating drug menadione and H2O2 results in increased resistance to H2O2 toxicity and increased virulence of L. chagasi promastigotes [62]. Corroborating these findings, the inhibition of ROS production by treatment with NAC reduced parasite burden in BALB/c mice infected with Leishmania amazonensis [63]. The exposure of T. cruzi to sub-lethal doses of H2O2 caused an increase in the level of antioxidant enzymes, and confers resistance to this oxidant [11,29]. Moreover, some authors have demonstrated different ROS-independent mechanisms used by cells to kill T. cruzi, contesting the necessity of these molecules in killing of parasites [64,65].
However, other studies relate ROS with the killing of parasites. Macrophages treated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), which triggers respiratory burst, are incapable of releasing ROS upon subsequent re-stimulation. In these cells, PMA pre-treatment contributes to growth of T. cruzi, pointing to the importance of a respiratory burst mechanism in killing of intracellular parasites [66]. In another work, the ability to release H2O2 and the ability to kill trypanosomes were correlated in macrophages [67] and strong evidence for peroxynitrite as a mediator of T. cruzi killing was also found [4]. Using a variant clone derived from the cloned macrophage cell line J774, which lacked the capacity of producing ROS, Tanaka et al. demonstrated that T. cruzi grew better in this variant cell line [33] and that H2O2 is associated with the killing of parasites [68].
Hence, from the exposed above, ROS may be friend to the parasite or foe.
ROS: Foe
T. cruzi is exposed to oxidative stress conditions in its life cycle [2,10,69] and this may generate oxidized nucleotides, causing DNA damage. We had already demonstrated that parasites with enhanced 8-oxo-dGTPase activity multiply better than wild type parasites in Swiss mice [29]. In the present work, we show that, although both wild-type and recombinant parasites had the same capacity of invading macrophages, modified parasites presented improved growth in macrophage cultures and confirm that these parasites multiply better in vivo, using C57BL6/WT mice, a different animal model. Hence, protection of DNA against oxidative stress is beneficial to the parasite performance both in vivo and in vitro. The reason for this better performance may be as simple as the quicker replication when there is less necessity of DNA repair, or a more complex mechanism involving increased expression of protective enzymes, as discussed below, and which exact cause is currently unknown.
The hydrolysis of 8-oxo-dGTP could prevent DNA lesions and this could explain the greater replicative capacity of parasites with enhanced 8-oxo-dGTPase activity. Indeed, we demonstrated that modified parasites prevent 8-oxo-dGTP incorporation into DNA when exposed to H2O2. Furthermore, TcMTH and EcMutT parasites expressed more TcCPx and TcMPx after exposure to H2O2 than WT parasites [29] and, importantly, incorporate less peroxynitrite (Fig 3). The enzymes TcCPX and TcMPX have the capacity to detoxify ONOO−, H2O2 and small-chain organic hydroperoxidases [18,21], which would explain the smaller concentrations of peroxynitrite inside TcMTH parasites compared to TcWT. Thus, these latter set of data speak for a more complex reason for higher proliferation of TcMTH parasites, which could involve increased expression of antioxidant enzymes.
T. cruzi contains four iron superoxide dismutases (FeSODs) that eliminate superoxide radicals by dismutation into H2O2 and molecular oxygen [70]. The levels of cytosolic SODB did not increase after oxidative treatment with H2O2, possibly because this enzyme is not involved with H2O2 detoxification. Furthermore, there are no differences in the levels of SODB between modified and wild type parasites. T. cruzi cytosolic FeSODB is particularly resistant to peroxinitrite inactivation, suggesting it participates mainly as an antioxidant defense enzyme, while mitochondrial FeSODA may act as an oxidative stress sensor participating in O2●−-mediated redox process of cell signaling [21,71]. Some works show that levels of TcCPX, TcMPX and mitochondrial SODA are up-regulated in infective forms of the parasite [20,72,73]. The relationship of these enzymes with the infective capacity of the parasite further helps to explain why modified parasites replicate more successfully in vitro and in vivo.
Thus, the results obtained here reinforce the idea that ROS are deleterious to T. cruzi, since modified parasites grow better, probably because they are better able to deal with oxidative stress conditions.
ROS: Friend
Phox KO macrophages infected with CL Brenner strain of T. cruzi had decreased parasitism compared to C57BL/6 WT macrophages. This difference is not related to the uptake of parasites, since our results demonstrate that both macrophages presented the same parasite uptake. Similarly, knockout mice to p47 subunit of NADPH oxidase (p47Phox KO) were not compromised in parasite uptake capacity [74]. We also show that the treatment with antioxidants reduce parasite replication. These results indicate that the parasite needs a signal provided by macrophages to replicate efficiently within these cells. These data are in agreement with a work published by Paiva et al [35] using Y strain of T. cruzi, but are in contrast with work published by Dhiman and Garg [74] using Sylvio X10/4 strain and p47Phox KO mice. This latter work shows no differences in the number of trypomastigotes released in the supernatants of infected macrophages from p47Phox KO and WT mice [74]. This difference could be related to the type of strain used or to levels of ROS detected in macrophages after parasite infection. Our results show that T. cruzi infection did not induce alterations in ROS levels detected in Phox KO macrophages, which are similar to levels observed in resting cells. The same result was obtained when we used zymosan as a stimulus (S4 Fig). Dhiman and Garg, however, showed that ROS levels detected in p47Phox KO cells are reduced when compared to levels produced by WT cells, but are significantly higher when compared to basal levels of production in non-infected cells [74].
Our results suggest that the parasite needs a signal given by ROS in order to grow inside the cells. It is unlikely that O2●− is the reactive oxygen species responsible for signaling in T. cruzi, because of the anionic nature and restricted capacity of this molecule in to cross membranes. So, the exposure of parasites in the cytosol to this radical would be unlikely. On the other hand, H2O2 is an oxidant with higher diffusional capacity. Although H2O2 is known for its cytotoxic effects, recently it has emerged as an important regulator of signal transduction in eukaryotic cells. This positive (signaling) or negative (damage) effect is dependent of the level of H2O2 and of the cell type under investigation [75]. We show here that parasite growth in Phox KO macrophages could be triggered if we treated Phox KO macrophages or antioxidant treated-WT macrophages with H2O2 before infection. Treatment of parasites with H2O2 before infection also induced the recovery of replicative capacity in Phox KO macrophages. In addition, treatment of blood-derived parasites with H2O2 used for in vivo infection increased parasitemia levels in C57BL/6 WT mice. Although the mechanism by which ROS promotes parasite proliferation remains to be elucidated, our data suggest that this signal is given to the parasite instead the macrophage, since pre-treatment of parasites is sufficient to promote growth in Phox KO macrophages and in vivo.
Further evidence that H2O2 is the signal for parasite replication is that treatment of macrophages with catalase, an enzyme that promotes H2O2 detoxification, also reduced parasitism. This signal could be provide by a direct or an indirect effect of H2O2. Removal of H2O2 by antioxidant enzymes prevents H2O2 signaling, but recent studies have identified several peroxide-signaling mechanisms in which antioxidant enzymes act as H2O2 sensors. The high affinity of some peroxidases for H2O2 makes them suited for hydrogen peroxide-sensing [75]. The peroxidase class of H2O2-scavenging enzymes has conserved cysteine residues in their catalytic sites, which are targets for oxidation by H2O2 [76]. The initial H2O2 sensing event would be the oxidation of an antioxidant enzyme, which then leads to changes in the activity of associated components of the signaling pathway [75]. A recent work shows that H2O2 signaling could be sensed by cysteine-containing proteins, such as thiol peroxidase peroxiredoxin-2 (PRX-2), which would become oxidized and would transmit oxidative equivalents to the redox-regulated transcription factor STAT3. Prx2 catalyzes the formation of disulfide-linked STAT3 oligomers, which compromises its capacity to promote transcription [77]. This could influence the cellular response, activating or inhibiting different cell pathways related with pathogen invasion.
Some studies have suggested that oxidative stress is important for T. cruzi proliferation [35,36]. One evidence for the role of ROS in signaling events is that ROS or heme-induced ROS activate a CaM Kinase II-like pathway muttriggering the proliferation of the epimastigote forms of T. cruzi [36]. In addition, the oxidative stress generated in response to Y strain of T. cruzi contributes to the maintenance of high parasite burdens in macrophages [35]. The treatment with antioxidants inhibited epimastigote proliferation in vitro [36] and reduced T. cruzi parasitemia [78].
Once in the vertebrate host, trypomastigotes invade cells at the inoculation site (e.g., fibroblasts, macrophages, and epithelial cells) [79,80]. T. cruzi multiplies inside resident macrophages and disrupts these cells, which release infective trypomastigote forms that reach blood circulation and disseminates to other cells, like myocardium and autonomic nervous system ganglion cells that innervate esophagus and intestine walls. We found no differences in parasitemia in Phox KO and C57BL/6 WT mice. This could be because ROS are important to signaling events in macrophages, but not in other host cells, like for example fibroblasts [35]. These data are in contrast with the reported increased parasite burden in apocynin-treated mice and in p47Phox KO mice infected with strain Sylvio X10/4 [74,81] and also in contrast with the reported reduced parasitemia in Phox KO mice infected with Y strain [35]. Data with p47Phox KO mice show that these mice succumbed to infection with SylvioX10/4 strain probably because of a compromised CD8+T cell response, leading to increased parasite burden and pathogenesis [74]. Our results on in vivo infection with CL Brenner strain are in agreement with the previously published work by our group with Y strain [52]. In that paper, we showed that infected Phox KO mice succumb to infection probably due to low blood pressure caused by excess ●NO, which was not quenched by superoxide. Apocynin treatment increased parasitemia in C3H/HeN mice infected with the SylvioX10/4 strain. The reason for the discrepancy between data obtained in Phox KO mice in our hands and apocynin-treated mice described earlier [74,81] may be several, including mouse strain and parasite strain. The SylvioX10/4 strain grows more slowly in mice [74,81], and it is not clear if parasitemia in apocynin-treated mice was determined in the acute or in the chronic phase of infection. In addition, it is possible that apocynin inhibits other oxidative mechanisms independent of NOX2. In vitro, apocynin has been shown to have an oxidative effect [82]. In our hands, apocynin effects were consistent with the inhibition of NOX2 in macrophages.
The exact mechanism by which low oxidant production enhances T. cruzi infection remains to be elucidated. One possibility is that ROS could generate the oxidation of 8-oxoG, resulting in the monophosphate form, 8-oxodGMP, which could be acting as a second messenger to the cell, indicating the presence of oxidative stress and preparing the parasite to be more resistant. This is currently under investigation.
Conclusion
In the present study we attempted to clarify the importance of ROS in T. cruzi infections. We found that modified parasites, more resistant to DNA damage by ROS, multiply better inside macrophages, but their proliferation, as well as the proliferation of wild-type parasites, is significantly reduced when ROS production is inhibited in the host cell. A possible explanation is that parasites need minimal levels of ROS, which would work as a signal for replication. However, high levels of ROS are deleterious to the parasite, inducing, for example, DNA damage. In this way, parasites over-expressing 8-oxo-GTPase could be more fit (since less DNA repair is necessary, for instance) and escape from the negative effects induced by ROS, by decreasing double-strand breaks and thus lethal lesions, increasing their replicative capacity.
Supporting Information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
GRG, PSR, PHNA, CRM and LQV are CNPq fellows. This work was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, CDS - RED-00013-14, APQ-01993-12 and APQ-02308-13), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) e Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/Udelar proc 053/2013). The authors are members of the INCT de Processos Redox em Biomedicina-Redoxoma (FAPESP/CNPq/CAPES, proc 573530/2008-4). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Kierszenbaum F, Knecht E, Budzko DB, Pizzimenti MC. Phagocytosis: a defense mechanism against infection with Trypanosoma cruzi. J Immunol. 1974; 112: 1839–1844 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cardoni RL, Antunez MI, Morales C, Nantes IR. Release of reactive oxygen species by phagocytic cells in response to live parasites in mice infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997; 56: 329–334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Melo RC, Fabrino DL, D'Avila H, Teixeira HC, Ferreira AP. Production of hydrogen peroxide by peripheral blood monocytes and specific macrophages during experimental infection with Trypanosoma cruzi in vivo. Cell Biol Int. 2003; 27: 853–861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Alvarez MN, Peluffo G, Piacenza L, Radi R. Intraphagosomal peroxynitrite as a macrophage-derived cytotoxin against internalized Trypanosoma cruzi: consequences for oxidative killing and role of microbial peroxiredoxins in infectivity. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286: 6627–6640 10.1074/jbc.M110.167247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Babior BM. The respiratory burst of phagocytes. J Clin Invest. 1984; 73: 599–601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Groemping Y, Rittinger K. Activation and assembly of the NADPH oxidase: a structural perspective. Biochem J. 2005; 386: 401–416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alvarez MN, Piacenza L, Irigoin F, Peluffo G, Radi R. Macrophage-derived peroxynitrite diffusion and toxicity to Trypanosoma cruzi. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004; 432: 222–232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Piacenza L, Peluffo G, Alvarez MN, Kelly JM, Wilkinson SR, Radi R. Peroxiredoxins play a major role in protecting Trypanosoma cruzi against macrophage- and endogenously-derived peroxynitrite. Biochem J. 2008; 410: 359–368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Krauth-Siegel RL, Comini MA. Redox control in trypanosomatids, parasitic protozoa with trypanothione-based thiol metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008; 1780: 1236–1248 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Piacenza L, Alvarez MN, Peluffo G, Radi R. Fighting the oxidative assault: the Trypanosoma cruzi journey to infection. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009; 12: 415–421 10.1016/j.mib.2009.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Finzi JK, Chiavegatto CW, Corat KF, Lopez JA, Cabrera OG, Mielniczki-Pereira AA, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi response to the oxidative stress generated by hydrogen peroxide. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004; 133: 37–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shames SL, Fairlamb AH, Cerami A, Walsh CT. Purification and characterization of trypanothione reductase from Crithidia fasciculata, a newly discovered member of the family of disulfide-containing flavoprotein reductases. Biochemistry. 1986; 25: 3519–3526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wilkinson SR, Meyer DJ, Kelly JM. Biochemical characterization of a trypanosome enzyme with glutathione-dependent peroxidase activity. Biochem J. 2000; 352 Pt 3: 755–761 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wilkinson SR, Temperton NJ, Mondragon A, Kelly JM. Distinct mitochondrial and cytosolic enzymes mediate trypanothione-dependent peroxide metabolism in Trypanosoma cruzi. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 8220–8225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wilkinson SR, Taylor MC, Touitha S, Mauricio IL, Meyer DJ, Kelly JM. TcGPXII, a glutathione-dependent Trypanosoma cruzi peroxidase with substrate specificity restricted to fatty acid and phospholipid hydroperoxides, is localized to the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochem J. 2002; 364: 787–794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wilkinson SR, Meyer DJ, Taylor MC, Bromley EV, Miles MA, Kelly JM. The Trypanosoma cruzi enzyme TcGPXI is a glycosomal peroxidase and can be linked to trypanothione reduction by glutathione or tryparedoxin. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 17062–17071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wilkinson SR, Obado SO, Mauricio IL, Kelly JM. Trypanosoma cruzi expresses a plant-like ascorbate-dependent hemoperoxidase localized to the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 13453–13458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Trujillo M, Budde H, Pineyro MD, Stehr M, Robello C, Flohe L, et al. Trypanosoma brucei and Trypanosoma cruzi tryparedoxin peroxidases catalytically detoxify peroxynitrite via oxidation of fast reacting thiols. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 34175–34182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wilkinson SR, Obado SO, Mauricio IL, Kelly JM. Trypanosoma cruzi expresses a plant-like ascorbate-dependent hemoperoxidase localized to the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 13453–13458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Piacenza L, Zago MP, Peluffo G, Alvarez MN, Basombrio MA, Radi R. Enzymes of the antioxidant network as novel determiners of Trypanosoma cruzi virulence. Int J Parasitol. 2009; 39: 1455–1464 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.05.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Piacenza L, Peluffo G, Alvarez MN, Martinez A, Radi R. Trypanosoma cruzi antioxidant enzymes as virulence factors in Chagas disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013; 19: 723–734 10.1089/ars.2012.4618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Peloso EF, Vitor SC, Ribeiro LH, Pineyro MD, Robello C, Gadelha FR. Role of Trypanosoma cruzi peroxiredoxins in mitochondrial bioenergetics. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2011; 43: 419–424 10.1007/s10863-011-9365-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Neeley WL, Essigmann JM. Mechanisms of formation, genotoxicity, and mutation of guanine oxidation products. Chem Res Toxicol. 2006; 19: 491–505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cheng KC, Cahill DS, Kasai H, Nishimura S, Loeb LA. 8-Hydroxyguanine, an abundant form of oxidative DNA damage, causes G——T and A——C substitutions. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267: 166–172 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hsu GW, Ober M, Carell T, Beese LS. Error-prone replication of oxidatively damaged DNA by a high-fidelity DNA polymerase. Nature. 2004; 431: 217–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Michaels ML, Miller JH. The GO system protects organisms from the mutagenic effect of the spontaneous lesion 8-hydroxyguanine (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine). J Bacteriol. 1992; 174: 6321–6325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Barnes DE, Lindahl T. Repair and genetic consequences of endogenous DNA base damage in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Genet. 2004; 38: 445–476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.El-Sayed NM, Myler PJ, Bartholomeu DC, Nilsson D, Aggarwal G, Tran AN, et al. The genome sequence of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas disease. Science. 2005; 309: 409–415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aguiar PH, Furtado C, Repoles BM, Ribeiro GA, Mendes IC, Peloso EF, et al. Oxidative stress and DNA lesions: the role of 8-oxoguanine lesions in Trypanosoma cruzi cell viability. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013; 7: e2279 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mildvan AS, Weber DJ, Abeygunawardana C. Solution structure and mechanism of the MutT pyrophosphohydrolase. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1999; 73: 183–207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Abeygunawardana C, Weber DJ, Gittis AG, Frick DN, Lin J, Miller AF, et al. Solution structure of the MutT enzyme, a nucleoside triphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase. Biochemistry. 1995; 34: 14997–15005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Paiva CN, Bozza MT. Are reactive oxygen species always detrimental to pathogens? Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014; 20: 1000–1037 10.1089/ars.2013.5447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tanaka Y, Tanowitz H, Bloom BR. Growth of Trypanosoma cruzi in a cloned macrophage cell line and in a variant defective in oxygen metabolism. Infect Immun. 1983; 41: 1322–1331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Andrews NW. Oxidative stress and intracellular infections: more iron to the fire. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122: 2352–2354 10.1172/JCI64239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Paiva CN, Feijo DF, Dutra FF, Carneiro VC, Freitas GB, Alves LS, et al. Oxidative stress fuels Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122: 2531–2542 10.1172/JCI58525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nogueira NP, de Souza CF, Saraiva FM, Sultano PE, Dalmau SR, Bruno RE, et al. Heme-induced ROS in Trypanosoma cruzi activates CaMKII-like that triggers epimastigote proliferation. One helpful effect of ROS. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e25935 10.1371/journal.pone.0025935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jung JY, Madan-Lala R, Georgieva M, Rengarajan J, Sohaskey CD, Bange FC, et al. The intracellular environment of human macrophages that produce nitric oxide promotes growth of mycobacteria. Infect Immun. 2013; 81: 3198–3209 10.1128/IAI.00611-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Oberley-Deegan RE, Rebits BW, Weaver MR, Tollefson AK, Bai X, McGibney M, et al. An oxidative environment promotes growth of Mycobacterium abscessus. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010; 49: 1666–1673 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.08.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jimenez-Lopez C, Collette JR, Brothers KM, Shepardson KM, Cramer RA, Wheeler RT, et al. Candida albicans induces arginine biosynthetic genes in response to host-derived reactive oxygen species. Eukaryot Cell. 2013; 12: 91–100 10.1128/EC.00290-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fraternale A, Paoletti MF, Casabianca A, Nencioni L, Garaci E, Palamara AT, et al. GSH and analogs in antiviral therapy. Mol Aspects Med. 2009; 30: 99–110 10.1016/j.mam.2008.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tung WH, Hsieh HL, Yang CM. Enterovirus 71 induces COX-2 expression via MAPKs, NF-kappaB, and AP-1 in SK-N-SH cells: Role of PGE(2) in viral replication. Cell Signal. 2010; 22: 234–246 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Vlahos R, Stambas J, Bozinovski S, Broughton BR, Drummond GR, Selemidis S. Inhibition of Nox2 oxidase activity ameliorates influenza A virus-induced lung inflammation. PLoS Pathog. 2011; 7: e1001271 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mittra B, Cortez M, Haydock A, Ramasamy G, Myler PJ, Andrews NW. Iron uptake controls the generation of Leishmania infective forms through regulation of ROS levels. J Exp Med. 2013; 210: 401–416 10.1084/jem.20121368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pollock JD, Williams DA, Gifford MA, Li LL, Du X, Fisherman J, et al. Mouse model of X-linked chronic granulomatous disease, an inherited defect in phagocyte superoxide production. Nat Genet. 1995; 9: 202–209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.DaRocha WD, Silva RA, Bartholomeu DC, Pires SF, Freitas JM, Macedo AM, et al. Expression of exogenous genes in Trypanosoma cruzi: improving vectors and electroporation protocols. Parasitol Res. 2004; 92: 113–120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dalton DK, Pitts-Meek S, Keshav S, Figari IS, Bradley A, Stewart TA. Multiple defects of immune cell function in mice with disrupted interferon-gamma genes. Science. 1993; 259: 1739–1742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J, Skipper PL, Wishnok JS, Tannenbaum SR. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N]nitrate in biological fluids. Anal Biochem. 1982; 126: 131–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Moore MK, Viselli SM. Staining and quantification of proteins transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Anal Biochem. 2000; 279: 241–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Struthers L, Patel R, Clark J, Thomas S. Direct detection of 8-oxodeoxyguanosine and 8-oxoguanine by avidin and its analogues. Anal Biochem. 1998; 255: 20–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gad H, Koolmeister T, Jemth AS, Eshtad S, Jacques SA, Strom CE, et al. MTH1 inhibition eradicates cancer by preventing sanitation of the dNTP pool. Nature. 2014; 508: 215–221 10.1038/nature13181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.BRENER Z. Therapeutic activity and criterion of cure on mice experimentally infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1962; 4: 389–396 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Santiago HC, Gonzalez Lombana CZ, Macedo JP, Utsch L, Tafuri WL, Campagnole-Santos MJ, et al. NADPH phagocyte oxidase knockout mice control Trypanosoma cruzi proliferation, but develop circulatory collapse and succumb to infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012; 6: e1492 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dreher D, Junod AF. Role of oxygen free radicals in cancer development. Eur J Cancer. 1996; 32A: 30–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Houstis N, Rosen ED, Lander ES. Reactive oxygen species have a causal role in multiple forms of insulin resistance. Nature. 2006; 440: 944–948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Singal PK, Khaper N, Farahmand F, Bello-Klein A. Oxidative stress in congestive heart failure. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2000; 2: 206–211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Droge W. Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiol Rev. 2002; 82: 47–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Frein D, Schildknecht S, Bachschmid M, Ullrich V. Redox regulation: a new challenge for pharmacology. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005; 70: 811–823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rudolph TK, Freeman BA. Transduction of redox signaling by electrophile-protein reactions. Sci Signal. 2009; 2: re7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Trachootham D, Lu W, Ogasawara MA, Nilsa RD, Huang P. Redox regulation of cell survival. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2008; 10: 1343–1374 10.1089/ars.2007.1957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rhee SG. Cell signaling. H2O2, a necessary evil for cell signaling. Science. 2006; 312: 1882–1883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sarsour EH, Kumar MG, Chaudhuri L, Kalen AL, Goswami PC. Redox control of the cell cycle in health and disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009; 11: 2985–3011 10.1089/ARS.2009.2513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wilson ME, Andersen KA, Britigan BE. Response of Leishmania chagasi promastigotes to oxidant stress. Infect Immun. 1994; 62: 5133–5141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Monteiro MC, Marques FC, Blazius RD, Santos da SO, de Queiroz CF, Bento DB, et al. N-acetyl-L: -cysteine reduces the parasitism of BALB/c mice infected with Leishmania amazonensis. Parasitol Res. 2008; 102: 801–803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.McCabe RE, Mullins BT. Failure of Trypanosoma cruzi to trigger the respiratory burst of activated macrophages. Mechanism for immune evasion and importance of oxygen-independent killing. J Immunol. 1990; 144: 2384–2388 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Munoz-Fernandez MA, Fernandez MA, Fresno M. Activation of human macrophages for the killing of intracellular Trypanosoma cruzi by TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma through a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism. Immunol Lett. 1992; 33: 35–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Murray HW. Pretreatment with phorbol myristate acetate inhibits macrophage activity against intracellular protozoa. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1982; 31: 479–487 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Nathan C, Nogueira N, Juangbhanich C, Ellis J, Cohn Z. Activation of macrophages in vivo and in vitro. Correlation between hydrogen peroxide release and killing of Trypanosoma cruzi. J Exp Med. 1979; 149: 1056–1068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tanaka Y, Kiyotaki C, Tanowitz H, Bloom BR. Reconstitution of a variant macrophage cell line defective in oxygen metabolism with a H2O2-generating system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79: 2584–2588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Paes MC, Oliveira MB, Oliveira PL. Hydrogen peroxide detoxification in the midgut of the blood-sucking insect, Rhodnius prolixus. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2001; 48: 63–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Mateo H, Marin C, Perez-Cordon G, Sanchez-Moreno M. Purification and biochemical characterization of four iron superoxide dismutases in Trypanosoma cruzi. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2008; 103: 271–276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Prolo C, Alvarez MN, Radi R. Peroxynitrite, a potent macrophage-derived oxidizing cytotoxin to combat invading pathogens. Biofactors. 2014; 40: 215–225 10.1002/biof.1150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Atwood JA III, Weatherly DB, Minning TA, Bundy B, Cavola C, Opperdoes FR, et al. The Trypanosoma cruzi proteome. Science. 2005; 309: 473–476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Parodi-Talice A, Monteiro-Goes V, Arrambide N, Avila AR, Duran R, Correa A, et al. Proteomic analysis of metacyclic trypomastigotes undergoing Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclogenesis. J Mass Spectrom. 2007; 42: 1422–1432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Dhiman M, Garg NJ. P47phox-/- mice are compromised in expansion and activation of CD8+ T cells and susceptible to Trypanosoma cruzi infection. PLoS Pathog. 2014; 10: e1004516 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Veal EA, Day AM, Morgan BA. Hydrogen peroxide sensing and signaling. Mol Cell. 2007; 26: 1–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.D'Autreaux B, Toledano MB. ROS as signalling molecules: mechanisms that generate specificity in ROS homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 8: 813–824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sobotta MC, Liou W, Stocker S, Talwar D, Oehler M, Ruppert T, et al. Peroxiredoxin-2 and STAT3 form a redox relay for H2O2 signaling. Nat Chem Biol. 2015; 11: 64–70 10.1038/nchembio.1695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Guevara AG, Guilvard E, Borges MM, Cordeiro da SA, Ouaissi A. N-Acetylcysteine and glutathione modulate the behaviour of Trypanosoma cruzi experimental infection. Immunol Lett. 2000; 71: 79–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Burleigh BA, Andrews NW. The mechanisms of Trypanosoma cruzi invasion of mammalian cells. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995; 49: 175–200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.de SW, de Carvalho TM, Barrias ES. Review on Trypanosoma cruzi: Host Cell Interaction. Int J Cell Biol. 2010; 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Dhiman M, Garg NJ. NADPH oxidase inhibition ameliorates Trypanosoma cruzi-induced myocarditis during Chagas disease. J Pathol. 2011; 225: 583–596 10.1002/path.2975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Castor LR, Locatelli KA, Ximenes VF. Pro-oxidant activity of apocynin radical. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010; 48: 1636–1643 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.