Skip to main content
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1985 Aug;54(2):179–183. doi: 10.1136/hrt.54.2.179

Prevalence and clinical significance of aortic valve prolapse.

L M Shapiro, B Thwaites, C Westgate, R Donaldson
PMCID: PMC481875  PMID: 4015927

Abstract

The prevalence and clinical significance of aortic valve prolapse were determined prospectively in 2000 consecutive patients undergoing routine clinical cross sectional echocardiography. Two hundred and twelve patients were excluded because the aortic cusps were not adequately visualised. Aortic valve prolapse was defined as downward displacement of cuspal material below a line joining the points of attachment of the aortic valve leaflets. Twenty four cases of aortic valve prolapse (1.2%) were identified. The patients were aged 12-64 years and nine were women. All had underlying valvar heart disease and the commonest lesion (in 11 cases) was prolapse of the larger cusp in bicuspid valves. Aortic valve prolapse was seen in four patients with mitral valve prolapse (two with severe regurgitation), one of whom had marfanoid aortic root dilatation. The remaining examples of aortic prolapse were seen in patients with various disorders including one with pulmonary atresia, two with aortic root disease (one with dissection and one with idiopathic dilatation), and one case of severe mitral regurgitation. Valves destroyed by infective endocarditis were seen in two cases. Aortic valve prolapse may be detected in various cardiac disorders and does not imply the presence of aortic regurgitation, but when bicuspid aortic valves are present it may well be important in producing such regurgitation. Although aortic valve prolapse may be associated with severe forms of mitral valve prolapse, these patients rarely have aortic regurgitation.

Full text

PDF
179

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Becher H., Hanrath P., Bleifeld W., Bleese N. Correlation of echocardiographic and surgical findings in acute bacterial endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 1984 Oct;5 (Suppl 100):67–70. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/5.suppl_c.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carter J. B., Sethi S., Lee G. B., Edwards J. E. Prolapse of semilunar cusps as causes of aortic insufficiency. Circulation. 1971 Jun;43(6):922–932. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.43.6.922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fenoglio J. J., Jr, McAllister H. A., Jr, DeCastro C. M., Davia J. E., Cheitlin M. D. Congenital bicuspid aortic valve after age 20. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Feb;39(2):164–169. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(77)80186-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Leech G., Mills P., Leatham A. The diagnosis of a non-stenotic bicuspid aortic valve. Br Heart J. 1978 Sep;40(9):941–950. doi: 10.1136/hrt.40.9.941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morganroth J., Jones R. H., Chen C. C., Naito M. Two dimensional echocardiography in mitral, aortic and tricuspid valve prolapse. The clinical problem, cardiac nuclear imaging considerations and a proposed standard for diagnosis. Am J Cardiol. 1980 Dec 18;46(7):1164–1177. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90287-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ogawa S., Hayashi J., Sasaki H., Tani M., Akaishi M., Mitamura H., Sano M., Hoshino T., Handa S., Nakamura Y. Evaluation of combined valvular prolapse syndrome by two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1982 Jan;65(1):174–180. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.65.1.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Perloff J. K. Evolving concepts of mitral-valve prolapse. N Engl J Med. 1982 Aug 5;307(6):369–370. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198208053070609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Read R. C., Thal A. P., Wendt V. E. Symptomatic valvular myxomatous transformation (the floppy valve syndrome). A possible forme fruste of the Marfan syndrome. Circulation. 1965 Dec;32(6):897–910. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.32.6.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rippe J. M., Angoff G., Sloss L. J., Wynne J., Alpert J. S. Multiple floppy valves: an echocardiographic syndrome. Am J Med. 1979 May;66(5):817–824. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(79)91122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roberts W. C., Morrow A. G., McIntosh C. L., Jones M., Epstein S. E. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valve causing severe, pure aortic regurgitation without superimposed infective endocarditis. Analysis of 13 patients requiring aortic valve replacement. Am J Cardiol. 1981 Feb;47(2):206–209. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90385-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rodger J. C., Morley P. Abnormal aortic valve echoes in mitral prolapse. Echocardiographic features of floppy aortic valve. Br Heart J. 1982 Apr;47(4):337–343. doi: 10.1136/hrt.47.4.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sahn D. J., Allen H. D., Goldberg S. J., Friedman W. F. Mitral valve prolapse in children: a problem defined by real-time cross-sectional echocardiography. Circulation. 1976 Apr;53(4):651–657. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.53.4.651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stewart W. J., King M. E., Gillam L. D., Guyer D. E., Weyman A. E. Prevalence of aortic valve prolapse with bicuspid aortic valve and its relation to aortic regurgitation: a cross-sectional echocardiographic study. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Dec 1;54(10):1277–1282. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80080-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES