Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2009 Aug 19;302(7):758–766. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1163

Antibiotic prescriptions rates for acute respiratory tract infections in the United States ambulatory settings, 1995–2006

Carlos G Grijalva 1, J Pekka Nuorti 1, Marie R Griffin 1
PMCID: PMC4818952  NIHMSID: NIHMS771434  PMID: 19690308

Abstract

Context

During the 1990s, antibiotic prescriptions for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTI) declined in the United States. The sustainability of those changes is unknown.

Objective

To assess trends in antibiotic prescriptions for ARTI

Design, Setting and Participants

National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data (1995–2006) were used to examine trends in antibiotic prescription rates by antibiotic indication and class. Annual survey data and census denominators were combined in 2-year intervals for rate calculations.

Main outcome

National annual visit and antibiotic prescription rates for ARTI including otitis media (OM) and for non-ARTI.

Results

Among children aged <5 years, annual ARTI visit rates declined 17% (95% CI: 9–24) from 1883 per 1000 population in 1995–1996 to 1560 per 1000 in 2005–2006, primarily due to a 33% (95% CI: 22–43) decline in OM visit rates (from 950 to 634 per 1000, respectively). This decline was accompanied by a 36% (95% CI: 26–45) decline in ARTI-associated antibiotic prescriptions (from 1216 to 779 per 1000). Among persons aged ≥5 years, ARTI visit rates remained stable but associated antibiotic prescription rates declined by 18% (95% CI: 6–29), from 178 to 146 per 1000. Antibiotic prescription rates for non-OM ARTI for which antibiotics are rarely indicated declined by 41% (95% CI: 22–55) and 24% (95% CI: 10–37) among persons aged <5 and ≥5 years, respectively. Overall, ARTI-associated prescription rates for penicillin, cephalosporins, sulfonamides and tetracyclines declined. Prescription rates for azithromycin increased and it became the most commonly prescribed macrolide for ARTI and OM (10% of OM visits). Among adults, quinolone prescriptions increased.

Conclusion

Overall antibiotic prescription rates for ARTI declined, associated with fewer OM visits in children aged <5 years and with fewer prescriptions for ARTI for which antibiotics are rarely indicated. However, prescription rates for broad spectrum antibiotics increased significantly.

INTRODUCTION

Infections caused by antibiotic-resistant microorganisms are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and a substantial economic burden.1 Antibiotic use creates selective pressure for the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.24 During the past decade, initiatives in the United States promoted the judicious use of antibiotics,5, 6 particularly for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTI). ARTI are a common cause of healthcare encounters and antibiotic prescriptions, especially in young children. In the late 1990s, antibiotic prescription rates in both children and adults declined.710 Notably, these declines were initially accompanied by increased prescription of broad spectrum antibiotics.911

Other interventions may also have reduced antibiotic prescriptions and limited the spread of antibiotic resistance. Routine infant immunization with a seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in the United States resulted in declines in rates of invasive disease due to antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.12 Data from CDC’s laboratory and population-based surveillance, indicates that declines in pneumococcal isolates resistant to penicillin, sulfonamides and selected cephalosporins has been sustained, but the proportion of erythromycin-resistant pneumococcus increased after the initial declines.13 In the late 1990s, increasing rates of macrolide-resistant invasive pneumococcal disease were temporally associated with increasing use of macrolides, especially azithromycin.14

Recent measurements of antibiotic prescription patterns in the United States are unavailable. This article assesses national trends in antibiotic prescriptions for ARTI in ambulatory settings.

METHODS

Sources of information

We analyzed annual data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 1995 to 2006. NAMCS gathers data on a nationally representative sample of visits to office-based physicians engaged in direct patient care, whereas NHAMCS collects data on a representative sample of visits to hospital-based emergency departments and outpatient clinics. These surveys record patient demographics, symptoms, procedures, diagnoses, and prescribed medications for a systematic sample of visits. During the study period, physician participation rates in NAMCS ranged from 59%–73%, and the un-weighted item non-response rates were typically ≤5%.15 Rates of hospital participation in NHAMCS ranged from 90%–98% and the un-weighted item non-response rates were typically ≤5%.16

Up to three diagnoses per visit are recorded in NAMCS and NHAMCS, using ICD9-CM codes. ARTI visits included those with any listed diagnosis of otitis media (OM), bronchitis, bronchiolitis, pneumonia, sinusitis, pharyngitis, tonsillitis, laryngitis, tracheitis, nasopharyngitis and mastoiditis (ICD9-CM: 381.*–383.*, 460.*–466.*, 480.*–487.*, 490.*). Rates were also calculated for OM, the most common reason for physician visits and antibiotic prescriptions in young children8 (ICD9-CM: 381.*–382.*). For specific analyses, we also defined mutually exclusive groups: 1) ARTI for which antibiotics are often indicated (OM, mastoiditis, sinusitis, pharyngitis, tonsillitis and non-viral pneumonia);1719 and, 2) ARTI for which antibiotics are rarely indicated (acute nasopharyngitis, laryngitis, unspecified upper respiratory infection, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, viral pneumonia and influenza).1719 We also explored the concurrent presence of common non-ARTI diseases that could result in an antibiotic prescription such as urinary tract infections (ICD9-CM: 599.0, 595.0, 595.9) and soft tissue infections (ICD9-CM: 680.*–682.*).8, 20

Antibiotic classes included in the study were penicillins, cephalosporins, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, macrolides (including azalides), lincosamides and quinolones. Antibiotic prescriptions were identified using the National Drug Code directory, generic names, drug names, and the Multum classification of therapeutic classes.15, 16 Visits that resulted in the prescription of ≥2 antibiotic classes contributed one observation to each class and rates of specific antibiotic prescriptions during ARTI visits were estimated. Since use of some antibiotics was rare, estimates for sulfonamides and tetracyclines, and lincosamides and macrolides were analyzed together. Quinolone exposures were too rare to estimate rates for children. Separate estimates were obtained for azithromycin, amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Azithromycin exposures were too rare to estimate prescription rates for OM for children <5 years until 1997.

Statistical analysis

For a comprehensive assessment of United States ambulatory settings, NAMCS and NHAMCS data were combined, and to obtain robust estimates, annual survey data were combined in 2-year intervals.8 All reported estimates were based on ≥30 un-weighted observations and relative standard errors <30%.15, 16

Since children aged <5 years had the highest visit rates for ARTI and antibiotic prescriptions8 and early activities promoting judicious use of antibiotics were primarily focused on them,21 our analyses were stratified as children aged <5 years and older persons. To assess differential effects of age and the aging of the United States population22, persons aged ≥5 years were further stratified into 5–17, 18–39, 40–64, 65–79 and 80 or more years.

Survey data were weighted to produce national estimates, with weights accounting for selection probabilities, adjustment for non response, population ratio adjustments, and weight smoothing.15, 16 Weighted observations represented rate numerators and denominators were obtained from the Census Bureau. For each two-year period, the population was calculated by averaging the two year population estimates. To estimate average annual rates and rate ratios, we fitted Poisson regression models to the survey data. Census population estimates for each time period and age groups provided an approximation to the person-time for each period and were distributed according to the aggregated weight factor of the national surveys, representing the offset term in the models.22, 23

Our models included terms for age, time and an age-time interaction term and accounted for the complex survey sampling design. Per our planned analyses, we compared the first (1995–1996) with the most recent (2005–2006) observation period, using rate ratios (RR). RR were estimated using linear predictors from the regression models. Rate differences (RD), and their 95% confidence intervals were also calculated.

We also assessed changes in prescribing practices by calculating the proportion of visits that resulted in antibiotic prescriptions.8 Proportions were estimated accounting for the survey design and trends in proportions were tested using weighted least square regressions.8 All reported p values were two-tailed and accounted for the complex survey design. A p value of <0.05 or the exclusion of 1 from the RR 95% confidence intervals indicated statistical significance. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.1 and Stata 10.0 survey packages. This study was considered exempt from review by the Institutional Review Boards of Vanderbilt University and CDC.

RESULTS

Visit characteristics

During the 12-year study period, the surveys estimated 6.2 billion ambulatory visits in the United States. Overall, 59% of patients were female and 84% were white. Approximately 82% of visits were to physician practices, 8% to hospital-based clinics, and 10% to emergency departments. Overall, antibiotics were prescribed in 13% of all ambulatory visits. ARTI visits accounted for 10% of all visits and for 44% of all antibiotic prescribing.

Children aged <5 years accounted for 9% of all visits and 34% of their visits were ARTI-associated. In this group, antibiotics were prescribed in 26% of all visits and in 56% of ARTI visits. Persons aged ≥5 years accounted for 91% of all visits and ARTI represented 8% of their visits. In this group, antibiotics were prescribed in 12% of all visits and in 58% of ARTI visits.

Children aged <5 years

ARTI visits

Overall annual visit rates were 4773 per 1000 population in 1995–1996 and remained stable during the study period. While ARTI-associated visit rates declined from by 17% (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76–0.91), non-ARTI visit rates increased by 25% (RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.19–1.31) (Table 1 and Figure 1). Concomitant conditions as a possible reason for antibiotic prescriptions associated with ARTI visits such as urinary tract infections (0.26% of ARTI visits) or soft tissue infections (0.06%) were uncommon.

Table 1. Rates and rate ratios of ambulatory visits and antibiotic prescriptions, United States 1995–2006.

Rates (per 1,000 population) and rate ratios of Ambulatory visit and antibiotic prescriptions, United States 1995–2006

All visits 1995–1996 2005–2006 RD 95% CI RR 95% CI
  <5 years 4773 5174 402 (−149 − 1017) 1.08 (0.97 − 1.21)
  5 to 17 years 2085 2436 351 (174 − 541) 1.17 (1.08 − 1.26)
  18 to 49 years 2689 2977 287 (129 − 455) 1.11 (1.05 − 1.17)
  50 to 64 years 3793 4627 834 (615 − 1065) 1.22 (1.16 − 1.28)
  65 to 79 years 5746 7166 1420 (1022 − 1841) 1.25 (1.18 − 1.32)
  80 or more years 6103 7705 1602 (1086 − 2156) 1.26 (1.18 − 1.35)

ARTI visits

  <5 years 1883 1560 −322 (−461 − −171) 0.83 (0.76 − 0.91)
  5 to 17 years 490 459 −31 (−84 − 29) 0.94 (0.83 − 1.06)
  18 to 49 years 220 206 −14 (−40 − 14) 0.93 (0.82 − 1.07)
  50 to 64 years 207 246 39 (2 − 83) 1.19 (1.01 − 1.4)
  65 to 79 years 282 266 −15 (−66 − 46) 0.95 (0.77 − 1.16)
  80 or more years 286 232 −54 (−111 − 22) 0.81 (0.61 − 1.08)

Non ARTI visits

  <5 years 2890 3614 724 (547 − 910) 1.25 (1.19 − 1.31)
  5 to 17 years 1595 1977 382 (317 − 449) 1.24 (1.2 − 1.28)
  18 to 49 years 2469 2771 302 (273 − 331) 1.12 (1.11 − 1.13)
  50 to 64 years 3586 4381 795 (755 − 836) 1.22 (1.21 − 1.23)
  65 to 79 years 5464 6899 1435 (1373 − 1498) 1.26 (1.25 − 1.27)
  80 or more years 5817 7473 1656 (1570 − 1743) 1.28 (1.27 − 1.3)

ATB in all visits

  <5 years 1552 1128 −424 (−551 − −281) 0.73 (0.64 − 0.82)
  5 to 17 years 552 495 −57 (−112 − 5) 0.9 (0.8 − 1.01)
  18 to 49 years 385 396 10 (−25 − 49) 1.03 (0.93 − 1.13)
  50 to 64 years 362 445 82 (30 − 141) 1.23 (1.08 − 1.39)
  65 to 79 years 461 635 174 (87 − 274) 1.38 (1.19 − 1.59)
  80 or more years 543 696 153 (27 − 307) 1.28 (1.05 − 1.57)

ATB in ARTI visits

  <5 years 1216 779 −437 (−542 − −315) 0.64 (0.55 − 0.74)
  5 to 17 years 314 219 −95 (−127 − −58) 0.7 (0.6 − 0.82)
  18 to 49 years 149 124 −25 (−45 − −1) 0.83 (0.7 − 0.99)
  50 to 64 years 120 141 21 (−6 − 54) 1.17 (0.95 − 1.45)
  65 to 79 years 145 134 −11 (−42 − 30) 0.93 (0.71 − 1.21)
  80 or more years 154 110 −44 (−77 − 4) 0.71 (0.5 − 1.02)

ATB in non ARTI visits

  <5 years 336 349 13 (−47 − 84) 1.04 (0.86 − 1.25)
  5 to 17 years 238 276 38 (2 − 80) 1.16 (1.01 − 1.34)
  18 to 49 years 236 271 35 (12 − 61) 1.15 (1.05 − 1.26)
  50 to 64 years 243 304 62 (22 − 106) 1.25 (1.09 − 1.44)
  65 to 79 years 316 501 185 (105 − 279) 1.58 (1.33 − 1.88)
  80 or more years 389 586 197 (77 − 347) 1.51 (1.2 − 1.89)
*

ARTI, acute respiratory tract infections; ATB, antibiotics; RD, Rate difference; RR, rate ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Data are from NAMCS and NHAMCS. Rates are average annual rates for each time period.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

National rates of ambulatory visits and antibiotic prescriptions, United States, 1995–2006

Footnote: ARTI, acute respiratory tract infections, ATB, antibiotics. White markers represent children aged <5 years, black markers represent persons aged ≥5 years. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Data are from NAMCS and NHAMCS. Rates are average annual rates for each time period.

ARTI-associated antibiotic prescriptions

Annual antibiotic prescription rates declined by 27% or 424 per 1000 children (95% CI: 281–551). This decline was due to a 36% (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55–0.74) reduction in ARTI-associated antibiotic prescriptions. Antibiotic prescription rates for non-ARTI visits remained stable (Table 1). The overall proportion of visits resulting in antibiotic prescriptions declined from 33% in 1995–1996 to 22% in 2005–2006 (p=0.008), due to reductions from 65% to 50% (p=0.011) in the proportion of ARTI visits resulting in antibiotics. The proportion of non-ARTI visits resulting in antibiotic prescriptions remained stable (p=0.157).

In physician practices, the proportion of ARTI visits that resulted in antibiotics declined from 65% to 48% (p=0.009); no significant declines were observed in emergency department visits (from 63% to 55%, p=0.115) or in outpatient clinics (from 60% to 54%, p=0.124).

Rates of ARTI visits resulting in penicillin prescriptions declined by 31% (Table 2). Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid prescription rates remained stable whereas amoxicillin prescription rates declined by 37%. Cephalosporin and sulfonamide/tetracycline prescription rates declined by 47% and 91%, respectively. Azithromycin prescription rates for ARTI increased 9-fold from 1995–1996 to 2005–2006 but overall prescription rates for macrolides/lincosamides remained stable (Table 2) mainly due to declines in erythromycin use (data not shown because of unreliable estimates during last periods).

Table 2. Rates, rate differences and rate ratios of antibiotic prescriptions during ARTI visits, United States, 1995–2006.

Rates (per 1,000 population), rate differences and rate ratios of antibiotic prescriptions during ARTI visits, United States 1995–2006

<5 years 1995–
1996
2005–
2006
RD 95% CI RR 95% CI

Penicillins 653 448 −204 (−274 – −121) 0.69 (0.58 – 0.81)
  Amoxicillin 556 351 −205 (−260 – −139) 0.63 (0.53 – 0.75)
  Amoxicillin / Clavulanic Acid 81 92 11 (−19 – 55) 1.13 (0.76 – 1.68)
Cephalosporins 315 167 −148 (−192 – −88) 0.53 (0.39 – 0.72)
Lyncosamides/macrolides 160 161 1 (−41 – 57) 1 (0.74 – 1.36)
  Azithromycin 16 140 124 (64 – 230) 8.78 (4.99 – 15.44)
Sulfonamides/tetracyclins 204 18 −186 (−193 – −174) 0.09 (0.05 – 0.15)

≥5 years 1995–
1996
2005–
2006
RD 95% CI RR 95% CI

Penicillins 82 47 −34 (−42 – −25) 0.58 (0.48 – 0.69)
  Amoxicillin 64 33 −31 (−37 – −24) 0.51 (0.42 – 0.63)
  Amoxicillin / Clavulanic Acid 8 11 3 (1 – 7) 1.44 (1.08 – 1.93)
Cephalosporins 38 22 −15 (−20 – −10) 0.59 (0.47 – 0.74)
Lyncosamides/macrolides 47 58 10 (0 – 23) 1.22 (1.01 – 1.48)
  Azithromycin 6 37 31 (22 – 44) 6.2 (4.63 – 8.3)
Sulfonamides/tetracyclins 15 8 −7 (−9 – −3) 0.53 (0.35 – 0.81)
Quinolones 4 21 17 (11 – 24) 5.39 (3.95 – 7.36)
*

ARTI, acute respiratory tract infections; RD, Rate difference; RR, rate ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Data are from NAMCS and NHAMCS. Rates are average annual rates for each time period.

OM in children aged <5 years

Annual OM rates declined by 33% from 950 to 634 per 1000 children from 1995–1996 to 2005–2006 (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57–0.78). Similarly, rates of antibiotic prescriptions for OM declined by 36% from 760 to 484 per 1000 (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.54–0.75). The proportion of OM visits that resulted in antibiotic prescriptions remained about 80% throughout the study years (p=0.142) (Figure 2A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

National rates of otitis media and non-otitis media ARTI visits, antibiotic prescriptions and proportion of visits resulting in antibiotic prescriptions, United States, 1995–2006

Footnote: ARTI, acute respiratory tract infections, ATB, antibiotics. White markers represent children aged <5 years, black markers represent persons aged ≥5 years. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. ARTI for which antibiotics are often indicated (Column B) included mastoiditis, sinusitis, pharyngitis, tonsillitis and non-viral pneumonia. ARTI for which antibiotics are rarely indicated (Column C) included acute nasopharyngitis, laryngitis, unspecified upper respiratory infection, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, viral pneumonia and influenza. Data are from NAMCS and NHAMCS. Rates are average annual rates for each time period.

Penicillin prescriptions rates for OM declined from 390 to 307 per 1000 6 (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65–0.96; amoxicillin rates declined from 326 to 233 per 1000 (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.58–0.88); and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid prescription rates remained stable. Cephalosporin prescription rates declined from 211 to 103 per 1000 in 2005–2006 (RR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35–0.67). Sulfonamide/tetracycline prescription rates declined from 143 to 11 per 1000 (RR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04–0.15), whereas macrolide/lincosamide prescription rates remained stable. Azithromycin prescription rates remained stable from 1997–1998 to 2005–2006 (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.70–1.73); in 2005–2006 it was the most commonly prescribed macrolide for OM with 65 (95% CI: 46–90) prescriptions per 1000 children (approximately 10% of OM visits).

Non-OM ARTI

Overall, rates of antibiotic prescriptions associated with non-OM ARTI visits declined by 35% (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52–0.81). Rates of non-OM ARTI for which antibiotics are often indicated; rates of antibiotic prescription associated with these visits; and the proportion of these visits resulting in an antibiotic prescription did not change significantly throughout the study years. (Figure 2B). Rates of ARTI visits for which antibiotics are rarely indicated remained stable, whereas associated antibiotic prescription rates declined by 41% (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.45–0.78). The proportion of these non-OM ARTI visits resulting in antibiotic prescription also declined from 41% in 1995–1996 to 23% in 2005–2006 (p=0.038) (Figure 2C).

Persons aged ≥5 years

ARTI visits

Overall annual visit rates increased by 19% from 3154 to 3758 per 1000 population (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.15–1.23). This was primarily due to a 21% increase in non-ARTI visit rates (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.20–1.23). ARTI rates remained stable and similar changes were observed in the age-stratified analyses (Table 1 and Figure 1). Although declines in rates of otitis media and related antibiotic prescriptions in this age group were similar to those among children aged <5 years, these rates were substantially lower (Figure 2A). As with children, concomitant conditions during an ARTI visit that could result in antibiotic prescriptions such as urinary tract infections (0.66%) or soft tissue infections (0.15%) were uncommon.

ARTI-associated antibiotic prescriptions

Although overall antibiotic prescription rates remained stable among subjects aged ≥5 years, the stratified analysis showed significant increases among persons aged 50 years or older. Overall antibiotic prescriptions associated with ARTI visits declined by 18% (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71–0.94) but significant declines occurred only among persons aged <50 years. Non-ARTI visit associated antibiotic prescriptions increased in all groups aged ≥5 years (Table 1). Overall, about 12% of all visits for persons aged ≥5 years consistently resulted in antibiotic prescriptions. The proportion of ARTI visits that resulted in antibiotic prescriptions was 63% in 1995–1996 and 54% in 2005–2006 (p=0.072). The proportion of non-ARTI visits resulting in antibiotic prescriptions remained stable (p=0.795).

In physician practices, the proportion of ARTI visits that resulted in antibiotic prescriptions among persons aged ≥5 years declined from 63% to 52% (p=0.025), whereas no significant changes were observed in emergency department visits (from 63% to 64%, p=0.510) or in outpatient clinics (from 61% to 60%, p=0.885).

Overall rates of ARTI visits resulting in penicillin prescriptions declined by 42% (Table 2). Amoxicillin prescription rates declined by 49% whereas amoxicillin/clavulanic acid prescription rates increased by 44%. Cephalosporin prescription rates declined by 41% and sulfonamide/tetracycline prescription rates declined by 47%. Macrolide/lincosamide prescription rates increased by 22%, mainly due to a 6-fold increase in azithromycin prescription rates. Quinolone prescription rates increased 5-fold. Similar changes in prescriptions of antibiotic classes were observed across age-groups (Table 3).

Table 3. Rates, rate differences and rate ratios of antibiotic prescriptions during ARTI visits, United States 1995–2006.

Rates (per 1,000 population), rate differences and rate ratios of antibiotic prescriptions during ARTI visits, United States 1995–2006

Penicillins 1995–1996 2005–2006 RD 95% CI RR 95% CI
  <5 years 653 448 −204 (−274 – −121) 0.69 (0.58 – 0.81)
  5 to 17 years 190 122 −68 (−91 – −39) 0.64 (0.52 – 0.8)
  18 to 49 years 62 33 −29 (−36 – −21) 0.53 (0.43 – 0.66)
  50 to 64 years 38 26 −12 (−21 – 4) 0.7 (0.44 – 1.1)
  65 to 79 years 44 22 −21 (−32 – −3) 0.51 (0.28 – 0.94)
  80 or more years 33 18 −16 (−25 – 5) 0.53 (0.24 – 1.16)

Cephalosporins

  <5 years 315 167 −148 (−192 – −88) 0.53 (0.39 – 0.72)
  5 to 17 years 65 39 −26 (−36 – −12) 0.6 (0.44 – 0.82)
  18 to 49 years 29 17 −12 (−17 – −5) 0.59 (0.43 – 0.82)
  50 to 64 years 28 16 −12 (−18 – −2) 0.59 (0.37 – 0.94)
  65 to 79 years 38 25 −13 (−22 – 0) 0.65 (0.42 – 1.01)
  80 or more years 48 24 −24 (−34 – −4) 0.5 (0.28 – 0.91)

Lyncosamides/macrolides

  <5 years 160 161 1 (−41 – 57) 1 (0.74 – 1.36)
  5 to 17 years 53 54 1 (−12 – 18) 1.02 (0.78 – 1.33)
  18 to 49 years 47 58 12 (−1 – 28) 1.25 (0.99 – 1.59)
  50 to 64 years 42 63 21 (4 – 45) 1.51 (1.09 – 2.08)
  65 to 79 years 46 54 8 (−13 – 41) 1.17 (0.73 – 1.88)
  80 or more years 46 46 0 (−23 – 44) 0.99 (0.5 – 1.95)

Sulfonamides/tetracyclines

  <5 years 204 18 −186 (−193 – −174) 0.09 (0.05 – 0.15)
  5 to 17 years 21 8 −13 (−17 – −1) 0.37 (0.15 – 0.93)
  18 to 49 years 13 7 −6 (−9 – −1) 0.53 (0.3 – 0.93)
  50 to 64 years 9 12 3 (−2 – 12) 1.34 (0.75 – 2.4)
  65 to 79 years 15 5 −10 (−13 – −1) 0.36 (0.14 – 0.9)
  80 or more years 23 5 −18 (−22 – −3) 0.23 (0.06 – 0.86)

Quinolones

  18 to 49 years 4 16 13 (7 – 23) 4.63 (2.88 – 7.43)
  50 to 64 years 7 30 24 (10 – 49) 4.56 (2.49 – 8.36)
  65 to 79 years 6 36 31 (13 – 65) 6.41 (3.28 – 12.52)
  80 or more years 8 37 29 (10 – 70) 4.58 (2.18 – 9.65)
*

ARTI, acute respiratory tract infections; RD, Rate difference; RR, rate ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Data are from NAMCS and NHAMCS. Rates are average annual rates for each time period.

Non-OM ARTI

Overall antibiotic prescription rates for non-OM ARTI among subjects aged ≥5 years declined by 15% (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73–0.98), due primarily to declines in antibiotic prescriptions for ARTI for which antibiotics are rarely indicated. Rates of non-OM ARTI visits for which antibiotics are often indicated showed a non-significant increase (RR: 1.12%, 95% CI: 0.97–1.30) and rates of antibiotic prescription associated with these visits remained stable. The proportion of these visits resulting in antibiotic prescriptions declined by 13% (p=0.004) and was 59% in 2005–2006 (Figure 2B). Rates of non-OM ARTI visits for which antibiotics are rarely indicated had a non-significant decline of 9% (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80–1.04) whereas antibiotic prescription rates associated with these visits declined by 24% (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63–0.90). The proportion of non-OM ARTI visits that resulted in an antibiotic prescription did not change significantly, and was 48% in 2005–2006 (Figure 2C).

DISCUSSION

Our analysis of 12 years of national ambulatory survey data showed sustained declines in ARTI-associated antibiotic prescription rates. These declines were primarily observed in physician practices and were associated with a decline in OM visits (children aged <5 years) and antibiotic prescriptions associated with ARTI for which antibiotics are rarely indicated (all age groups). Although these observations are encouraging, the prescription of broad spectrum antibiotics, namely azithromycin and quinolones, increased substantially during the study period.

The declines observed in antibiotic prescriptions in children aged <5 years were largely related to declines in OM visit rates. However, the proportion of OM visits that resulted in antibiotic prescriptions remained stable, suggesting that clinician’s practices for antibiotic prescribing given a diagnosis of OM did not change. Although the American Academy of Pediatrics practice guidelines for the management of OM were updated in early 2004 to encourage the initial observation of non-severe OM cases in selected children (i.e. “watchful waiting”),24, 25 the largest observed declines preceded these recommendations. Moreover, recent evidence suggests low adherence to the updated guidelines.26

Although visit rates for non-OM ARTI for which antibiotics are rarely indicated remained stable in children aged <5 years, rates of antibiotic prescriptions associated with these visits declined. Furthermore, the proportion of visits that resulted in antibiotic prescriptions declined. Similarly, among persons aged ≥5 years, visit rates for ARTI for which antibiotics are rarely indicated remained stable and there was a significant reduction in antibiotic prescriptions associated with these visits. These findings suggest improvements in antibiotic prescribing practices and also that previous observed declines in antibiotic prescriptions for these conditions were sustained through 2006.9, 10, 27, 28

Starting in the mid-1990’s, the CDC and several State and local health departments and other organizations launched interventions to promote appropriate antibiotic prescriptions.6 In 1995, the CDC launched the Campaign for Appropriate Antibiotic use in the Community and working with the American Academy of Pediatrics and members of the American Academy of Family Physicians, this initiative led to the publication of The Principles for appropriate use of antibiotic for pediatric upper respiratory tract infections.6 Furthermore, a number of projects launched at local or State levels have shown significant improvements in antibiotic prescribing, including controlled interventions in Denver (1997–1998), Boston/Seattle (1997–1998), Tennessee (1997–1998), Wisconsin (1997), and Alaska (1998–2000) among others.6 The CDC also launched the media campaign “Get Smart: Know when antibiotics work” in 2003.

Although the specific reasons for decreasing ARTI visit rates cannot be established by this study, several explanations could be hypothesized. First, the application of stricter diagnostic criteria for specific ARTI, a central component of the campaigns promoting the judicious use of antibiotics, could have increased the threshold to diagnose these conditions21 resulting in subsequent reductions in antibiotic prescriptions.29 Second, parents might be less likely to bring their children to a clinician for mild ARTI.30 Healthcare encounters can be prevented by educating parents to identify and relieve ear pain in their children.25, 31 Moreover, the CDC Get Smart campaign was associated with declines in ARTI visits and related antibiotic prescriptions in Colorado.32 Third, routine childhood immunization with PCV7 since 2000 reduced the incidence of both OM and pneumonia during the study period. The declines in OM visits we report here are consistent with other estimates of the effect of this intervention3337 Influenza vaccines, recommended for use among young children since 2004 and among all children aged ≥6 months since 2008, could further reduce the incidence of ARTI and associated antibiotic prescriptions.

Although ARTI-associated prescriptions for most antibiotic classes declined, prescription of selected macrolides and quinolones increased substantially. In the early 1990s, the recognition of the role of atypical microorganisms in ARTI and the emergence of penicillin-resistant bacteria led to the recommendation of macrolides as a first line empiric treatment for community-acquired pneumonia.3, 38 Macrolides have since been used widely to treat ARTI3, 39 and although declines in invasive pneumococcal disease due to non-susceptible pneumococci were documented after PCV7 introduction, concerns remain about the increasing use of azithromycin in the United States.7, 9, 12 Young children are commonly colonized with pneumococcus. Azithromycin is a bacteriostatic antibiotic and the least potent macrolide against pneumococcus. Its long half-life of approximately 3 days may result in prolonged exposure of bacteria to relatively inactive concentrations of the antibiotic and selection of resistant strains.40, 41 Although the ease of administration is an advantage, a recent meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials showed that azithromycin efficacy against bronchitis or pneumonia was not superior to amoxicillin or amoxicillin/clavulanate.42 Recent guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia in ambulatory adults suggest that macrolide monotherapy should be restricted to selected patients (i.e. previously healthy and without risk factors for drug-resistant S. pneumoniae).43

After introduction of PCV7 in the United States, the incidence of pneumococcal disease due to non-vaccine serotypes increased. These increases have been most notable for serotype 19A, a type that frequently is resistant to multiple antibiotics.44 Increasing use of antibiotics, in particular selected macrolides, may contribute to the emergence of these antibiotic-resistant non-vaccine serotypes. Increases in disease due to antibiotic-resistant serotype 19A were reported among Alaskan Native, Bedouin45 and South Korean children, populations where azithromycin is widely used, even though the latter two groups were not routinely immunized with PCV7. Interestingly, no increases in disease due to serotype 19A have been described among White Mountain Apache,46 a population exposed to PCV7 and in which azithromycin use is approved only for the treatment of sexually transmitted diseases and for children with documented penicillin allergy.47 Our findings indicate that azithromycin prescriptions rates increased substantially during recent years. The effects of these increases on the emergence of antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal serotypes not covered by PCV7 remain to be determined.

We also observed increasing prescription rates for quinolones for ARTI in persons aged ≥5 years. Increases in quinolone prescriptions and disease caused by quinolone-resistant bacteria have been reported in the United States and abroad.4850 Although the reported proportion of pneumococcal disease that is quinolone-resistant is still small (i.e. <1.8%)49, the increasing trends observed are of concern and warrant close monitoring.48, 49

Our study results must be interpreted in light of a number of limitations. First, we used ICD9-CM codes to identify ARTI and could not confirm diagnoses or appropriateness of antibiotics prescribed. Second, although our study evaluated antibiotic prescriptions, the adherence to these regimens is unknown. Moreover, additional antibiotic prescriptions or changes made over the telephone were not captured by the surveys. Third, available information did not allow the distinction between initial and follow-up visits throughout the study years. The inclusion of follow-up visits when no new antibiotic was prescribed would result in an underestimation of the proportion of ARTI that resulted in an antibiotic prescription. Fourth, survey participation rates have declined and required adjustments in weighting strategies over time. Nevertheless, national survey data provided consistent information to assess changes in antibiotic prescription patterns. Fifth, federal institutions such as the Veteran Affairs ambulatory services are not included in the national surveys.

There is little doubt that antibiotic use leads to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.2 Even though prescriptions for most classes of antibiotics declined, the prescription of quinolones and azithromycin increased. The potential role of these increases on the emergence of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms, in particular S. pneumoniae, has been described.2, 3, 14, 51 Our results indicate that overall antibiotic prescription rates have declined significantly. These changes coincided with efforts to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing and the initiation of routine infant immunization with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Further efforts to improve antibiotic selection are urgently needed.

Acknowledgments

Drs. Grijalva and Griffin received lecture fees from Wyeth. Dr. Griffin received grant support from MedImmune and Pfizer.

Funding/Support

This study was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through Cooperative Agreements with the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research (TS-1392 and TS-1454). Dr. Grijalva is supported by a CDC career development award (K01 CI000163).

Role of the sponsor

An investigator from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention participated in the design and conduct of the study; analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review and approval of the manuscript.

Additional Contributions

We gratefully acknowledge CDC investigators: Cynthia G. Whitney, MD, MPH and Lauri A. Hicks, DO, MPH, for critical, non-compensated review of the manuscript

Footnotes

Author Contributions

Dr. Grijalva had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Financial Disclosures

No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Spellberg B, Guidos R, Gilbert D, et al. The epidemic of antibiotic-resistant infections: a call to action for the medical community from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 15;46(2):155–164. doi: 10.1086/524891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Besser RE. Antimicrobial prescribing in the United States: good news, bad news. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Apr 1;138(7):605–606. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-7-200304010-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Klugman KP, Lonks JR. Hidden epidemic of macrolide-resistant pneumococci. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Jun;11(6):802–807. doi: 10.3201/eid1106.050147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lieberman JM. Appropriate antibiotic use and why it is important: the challenges of bacterial resistance. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 Dec;22(12):1143–1151. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000101851.57263.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Get Smart: Campaign Information Know When Antibiotics Work [Internet site] [Accessed December 4th 2008]; Available from http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/community/campaign-info.htm.
  • 6.Weissman J, Besser RE. Promoting appropriate antibiotic use for pediatric patients: a social ecological framework. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2004 Jan;15(1):41–51. doi: 10.1053/j.spid.2004.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Finkelstein JA, Stille C, Nordin J, et al. Reduction in antibiotic use among US children, 1996–2000. Pediatrics. 2003;112(3 Pt 1):620–627. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McCaig LF, Besser RE, Hughes JM. Trends in antimicrobial prescribing rates for children and adolescents. JAMA. 2002;287(23):3096–3102. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.23.3096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Steinman MA, Gonzales R, Linder JA, Landefeld CS. Changing use of antibiotics in community-based outpatient practice, 1991–1999. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Apr 1;138(7):525–533. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-7-200304010-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roumie CL, Halasa NB, Grijalva CG, et al. Trends in antibiotic prescribing for adults in the United States-1995 to 2002. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Aug;20(8):697–702. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0148.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McCaig LF, Besser RE, Hughes JM. Antimicrobial drug prescription in ambulatory care settings, United States, 1992–2000. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Apr;9(4):432–437. doi: 10.3201/eid0904.020268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kyaw MH, Lynfield R, Schaffner W, et al. Effect of introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 6;354(14):1455–1463. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs). Surveillance reports [internet site] [Accessed June 30th, 2008]; Available from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/abcs/survreports.htm.
  • 14.Hyde TB, Gay K, Stephens DS, et al. Macrolide resistance among invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. JAMA. 2001 Oct 17;286(15):1857–1862. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.15.1857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Ambulatory Health Care Data. NAMCS description [internet site] [Accessed June 2nd; 2008]; Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/ahcd/namcsdes.htm.
  • 16.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Ambulatory Health Care Data. NHAMCS description [internet site] [Accessed June 2nd 2008]; Available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/ahcd/nhamcsds.htm.
  • 17.Jacobs RF. Judicious use of antibiotics for common pediatric respiratory infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19(9):938–943. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200009000-00038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dowell SF, Schwartz B, Phillips WR. Appropriate use of antibiotics for URIs in children: Part I. Otitis media and acute sinusitis. The Pediatric URI Consensus Team. Am Fam Physician. 1998;58(5):1113–1118. 1123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dowell SF, Schwartz B, Phillips WR. Appropriate use of antibiotics for URIs in children: Part II. Cough, pharyngitis and the common cold. The Pediatric URI Consensus Team. AmFamPhysician. 1998;58(6):1335–1342. 1345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Steinman MA, Landefeld CS, Gonzales R. Predictors of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in adult primary care. JAMA. 2003 Feb 12;289(6):719–725. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.6.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dowell SF, Marcy SM, Phillips WR, Gerber MA, Schwartz B. Principles of Judicious Use of Antimicrobial Agents for Pediatric Upper Respiratory Tract Infections. Pediatrics. 1998;101(1):163–165. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.United States Census Bureau: Population Estimates Datasets [internet site] [Accessed January 5th 2009]; Available from http://www.census.gov/popest/datasets.html.
  • 23.Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, et al. Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. JAMA. 2004;292(11):1333–1340. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.11.1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Subcommittee on Management of Acute Otitis M. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Otitis Media. Pediatrics. 2004;113(5):1451–1465. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.5.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Finkelstein JA, Stille CJ, Rifas-Shiman SL, Goldmann D. Watchful waiting for acute otitis media: are parents and physicians ready? Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1466–1473. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vernacchio L, Vezina RM, Mitchell AA. Management of acute otitis media by primary care physicians: trends since the release of the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics/American Academy of Family Physicians clinical practice guideline. Pediatrics. 2007 Aug;120(2):281–287. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Halasa NB, Griffin MR, Zhu Y, Edwards KM. Decreased number of antibiotic prescriptions in office-based settings from 1993 to 1999 in children less than five years of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21(11):1023–1028. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200211000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Linder JA, Bates DW, Platt R. Antivirals and antibiotics for influenza in the United States, 1995–2002. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug;14(8):531–536. doi: 10.1002/pds.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Finkelstein JA, Huang SS, Kleinman K, et al. Impact of a 16-community trial to promote judicious antibiotic use in Massachusetts. Pediatrics. 2008 Jan;121(1):e15–e23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cosby JL, Francis N, Butler CC. The role of evidence in the decline of antibiotic use for common respiratory infections in primary care. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Nov;7(11):749–756. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70263-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McWilliams DB, Jacobson RM, Van Houten HK, Naessens JM, Ytterberg KL. A program of anticipatory guidance for the prevention of emergency department visits for ear pain. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Feb;162(2):151–156. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gonzales R, Corbett KK, Wong S, et al. "Get smart Colorado": impact of a mass media campaign to improve community antibiotic use. Med Care. 2008 Jun;46(6):597–605. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181653d2e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grijalva CG, Poehling KA, Nuorti JP, et al. National impact of universal childhood immunization with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on outpatient medical care visits in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):865–873. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Poehling KA, Szilagyi PG, Grijalva CG, et al. Reduction of frequent otitis media and pressure-equalizing tube insertions in children after introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Pediatrics. 2007 Apr;119(4):707–715. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhou F, Kyaw MH, Shefer A, Winston CA, Nuorti JP. Health care utilization for pneumonia in young children after routine pneumococcal conjugate vaccine use in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Dec;161(12):1162–1168. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.12.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhou F, Shefer A, Kong Y, Nuorti JP. Trends in acute otitis media-related health care utilization by privately insured young children in the United States, 1997–2004. Pediatrics. 2008 Feb;121(2):253–260. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Arbogast PG, Martin SW, Edwards KM, Griffin MR. Decline in pneumonia admissions after routine childhood immunisation with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the USA: a time-series analysis. Lancet. 2007 Apr 7;369(9568):1179–1186. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60564-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Niederman MS, Bass JB, Jr, Campbell GD, et al. Guidelines for the initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: diagnosis, assessment of severity, and initial antimicrobial therapy. American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Nov;148(5):1418–1426. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.5.1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Felmingham D, Reinert RR, Hirakata Y, Rodloff A. Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from the PROTEKT surveillance study, and compatative in vitro activity of the ketolide, telithromycin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Sep;50(Suppl S1):25–37. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Doern GV. Macrolide and ketolide resistance with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Med Clin North Am. 2006 Nov;90(6):1109–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2006.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.McKenna S, Evans G. Macrolides: A Canadian Infectious Disease Society position paper. Can J Infect Dis. 2001 Jul;12(4):218–231. doi: 10.1155/2001/657353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Panpanich R, Lerttrakarnnon P, Laopaiboon M. Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD001954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001954.pub3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44(Suppl 2):S27–S72. doi: 10.1086/511159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Moore MR, Gertz RE, Jr, Woodbury RL, et al. Population snapshot of emergent Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 19A in the United States, 2005. J Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 1;197(7):1016–1027. doi: 10.1086/528996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dagan R, Givon-Lavi N, Leibovitz E, Greenberg D, Porat N. Introduction and Proliferation of Multidrug-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Serotype 19A Clones That Cause Acute Otitis Media in an Unvaccinated Population. J Infect Dis. 2009 Feb 1; doi: 10.1086/597044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lacapa R, Bliss SJ, Larzelere-Hinton F, et al. Changing epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease among White Mountain Apache persons in the era of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Aug 15;47(4):476–484. doi: 10.1086/590001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Black S. Changing epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease: a complicated story. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Aug 15;47(4):485–486. doi: 10.1086/590002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Linder JA, Huang ES, Steinman MA, Gonzales R, Stafford RS. Fluoroquinolone prescribing in the United States, 1995 to 2002. Am J Med. 2005 Mar;118(3):259–268. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Karchmer AW. Increased antibiotic resistance in respiratory tract pathogens: PROTEKT US--an update. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Sep 1;39(Suppl 3):S142–S150. doi: 10.1086/421352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.von Gottberg A, Klugman KP, Cohen C, et al. Emergence of levofloxacin-non-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae and treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in children in South Africa: a cohort observational surveillance study. Lancet. 2008 Mar 29;371(9618):1108–1113. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60350-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chancey S, Zhou X, Stephens D. Macrolide Efflux System Encoded by mefE/mel(msrA) in Streptococcus pneumoniae is induced by 14- and 15- membered, but not 16-membered Macrolides. Poster P2-053. Presented to the Sixth International Symposium on Pneumococci and Pneumococcal Diseases (ISPPD6); 2008; Reykjavik, Iceland. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES