Abstract
Aim:
The present study was conducted to see the effect of feeding different levels of Azolla meal on blood biochemicals, hematology and immunocompetence traits of Chabro chicken.
Materials and Methods:
The study was conducted on 160 Chabro chicks, which were randomly divided into four treatment groups each with four replicates of 10 birds. The first treatment (T1) served as a control in which basal diets was offered without Azolla supplementation while in T2, T3, and T4 groups, basal diet was replaced with Azolla meal at 5%, 7.5%, and 10% levels, respectively. A feeding trial was conducted upto 8 weeks. At the last week of trial, blood samples were collected randomly from one bird of each replicate and plasma was separated to estimate certain biochemical parameters, some blood metabolites, minerals and enzymes like alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Hematological parameters such as hemoglobin, packed cell volume, total leukocytes count and differential leukocytes count were estimated in fresh blood just after collection. The humoral immune response was measured against sheep red blood cells,and cell-mediated immune response was measured against phyto hemagglutinin lectin from Phaseolus vulgaris (PHA-P).
Results:
The study showed that hematological profile of the Chabro bird was not affected by any treatment except heterophil and lymphocyte which was found higher in T2 and T3 groups and eosinophil was found higher in a T3 group than control. Blood glucose, creatinine, cholesterol, total protein, albumin, uric acid, and triglycerides were found similar in all the groups and within the normal values for broiler chicken. Liver enzymes and macro mineral content in blood were found similar in all the treatment groups and within normal physiological range. Although AST was found higher in 10% replacement group than control, the value was within normal range for broiler chicken. Although antibody titer was found similar in all the experimental groups in the present study, cell-mediate immune response (response to PHA-P) was found higher in 5%, 7.5%, and 10% replacement groups than control(p<0.05).
Conclusion:
Similar blood biochemical parameters and higher cell-mediated immune response in Azolla replacement group indicated immune-modulatory effect of Azolla meal without any toxicity.
Keywords: Azolla pinnata, blood biochemicals, hematology, immunocompetence traits
Introduction
In recent years, there has been a steep rise in poultry production throughout the world. As a result, it is gradually becoming a major thrust in the world economy, especially in the livestock sector. This increase has resulted in competition with the conventional human food ingredients leading to shortage and increased the cost of conventional feed ingredients [1]. Hence, some serious attempts were made by nutritionists in the past few years to substitute the conventional feed ingredients with animal wastes, slaughterhouse wastes, different non-conventional feed resources, etc.
Azolla is a small aquatic fern which flows on the water surface. The name is referred to conjugation of two Greek words, azo (to dry) and allyo (to kill) because the fern is killed by drought. Use of Azolla was initially limited as green manure but its use as mosquito inhibitor [2], herbicide, water saver, water purifier, nitrogen fertilizer saver [2], as drug, for reclaiming saline soils [3] and as bioremediation [4,5] are also been investigated. Azolla hosts symbiotic blue-green algae, Anabaena azollae, which is responsible for the fixation and assimilation of atmospheric nitrogen. Azolla, in turn, provides the carbon source and favorable environment for the growth and development of the algae. It is this unique symbiotic relationship that makes Azolla, a wonderful plant with high protein content.
Considering its nutrient content [6,7], Azolla was started to be used as feed ingredients for poultry, pig and livestock species. Though variable results were observed, most of the researches suggested improvement on production and reproduction parameters in poultry bird when birds were fed with Azolla meal replacing basal diets upto a certain level. Backyard poultry farming is now-a-day's promoted in India considering socio-economic condition of Indian farmers. Different central Government agencies are developing several strains of poultry birds for backyard farming. Chabro is one of them. This is developed by Central Poultry Development Organization (CPDO). Considering the potential of using Azolla meal as a partial replacement of commercial broiler feed in Chabro bird, current study was designed to observe effect of feeding different levels of Azolla pinnata on blood biochemicals, hematology and immunocompetence traits of Chabro chicken.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
Experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the institute Animal Ethics Committee for the use of poultry birds.
Experimental design, housing and management
In the experiment, there were four treatments groups each with four replicates of ten birds. The first treatment (T1) served as control in which basal diets was offered without Azolla supplementation while in T2, T3 and T4 groups basal diet was replaced with Azolla meal at 5%, 7.5%, and 10% levels, respectively. For experimental feeding trial, 160 days old Chabro broiler chicks were procured from poultry farm, U. P. Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura and reared for 8 weeks. Chicks were kept on deep litter system in brooder house under standard managemental and hygienic conditions for 1 week. They were provided standard broiler starter ration on newspaper spread on the floor. After 1 week, chicks were individually weighed and randomly divided into four groups of 40 chicks each, on the basis of average uniform body weights, discarding the extreme ranges of body weights. The chicks were transferred replicate wise (10 birds in each replicate groups) in the pens of similar dimensions. The chicks were housed in deep litter system. All the housing and manage mental conditions were similar for different treatment groups. Fresh and clean water was provided ad libitum to the chicks of different treatment groups. Throughout the experimental period, the chicks were provided artificial light by electric bulbs of sufficient intensity.
Feeds and feeding schedule
Standard broiler feeds for starter (0-4 weeks) and finisher (4-8 weeks) periods as per BIS specifications [8] were formulated and prepared in Feed Unit at ILFC, DUVASU, Mathura. Feed was prepared for feeding of experimental Chabro birds was consisted of maize, rice police, soybean meal, fish meal, dicalcium phosphate, lime stone, premix, salt, and metheonine in basal diet. The composition of feeds for the starter and finisher periods are presented in Table-1. In the treatment group, calculated amount of Azolla replaced basal diets at different levels. Azolla was collected from “Azolla Demonstration Unit” of the university and then it was dried under the sun. After drying, it was grounded and stored in the plastic bags until used for feeding. Feed was offered daily to the birds at 8.00 A.M. Representative samples of Azolla pinnata powder and experimental feed of starter (T1, T2, T3 and T4 groups) and finisher (T1, T2, T3, T4 groups) was analyzed for their nutrient composition viz. dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), total ash, crude fiber (CF), Ca and P as per AOAC [9]. Fiber fractions of feed samples were determined as per the method of Van Soest and Robertson [10].
Table-1.
Attributes | Experimental basal diet | |
---|---|---|
Starter | Finisher | |
Ingredients (g/kg) as feed | ||
Maize | 515.5 | 575.5 |
Rice police | 70 | 100 |
SBM | 300 | 250 |
FM | 80 | 40 |
DCP | 10 | 11 |
LS | 12 | 12 |
Premix | 05 | 05 |
Salt | 06 | 06 |
Meth | 1.5 | 0.5 |
Total | 1000 | 1000 |
1 kg premix contains vitamin A - 10,000,000 IU, vitamin D3 – 2,000,000 IU, vitamin B2 – 4g, vitamin E -1500 unit, vitamin K-2g, Pantothenate -5 g, nicotinamide-20 g, vitamin B 12-12 g, cholinchloride- 300 g, Ca- 1500 g, Mn -55 g, I -2g, Fe -15 g, Zn -30 g, Cu - 4 g, Co- 0.9 g, DCP=Dicalcium phosphate, SBM=Soybean meal, FM=Fish meal, LS=Limestone, DM=Dry matter
Blood sampling, hematology and biochemical analysis
At the last week of trial, blood samples were collected randomly from one bird of each replicate in heparinized vial. A part of blood sample was used for hematological parameters. Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min for plasma separation. Separated plasma samples were used for biochemical and enzyme analysis. Glucose and enzymes estimation were done within 24 h of the collection while for other estimations plasma was stored in refrigerator until the analysis. Hemoglobin, packed cell volume, total leukocyte count and differential leukocyte count were done by standard laboratory procedure. Blood biochemicals, liver enzymes activities and macro-minerals were estimated by using kit (Span Diagnostics Ltd.).
Humoral immune response against sheep red blood cells (SRBC)
Blood from jugular vein of healthy sheep was collected in Alsever's solution. The red blood cells were washed thrice in phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.2). Finally 1% suspension of SRBC in PBS (V/V) was prepared and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C until its use.
Immunization and harvesting of immune serum
1 ml of 1% (V/V) of SRBC suspension was injected to the birds. At 5 days post immunization about 2 ml of blood was collected from jugular vein. The antibody titer was determined by hemagglutination assay (HA) methods [11]. The titers were expressed as log 2 value. The response titer was the result of the difference between HA titer before and after SRBC immunization.
2-Mercaptoethanol resistant and sensitive antibodies (MER and MES) against SRBC
Antibodies were determined by means of a mercapto ethanol (ME) HA test as per the method described by Martin et al. [12] and the titer was recorded as 2-ME resistant antibody and expressed as log 2 values. The reduction of total titer due to 2-ME treatment was called 2-ME sensitive antibody, and the titer was expressed as log 2 value (Total HA titer-MER=MES). MER was denoted as immunoglobulin (Ig) G and MES was denoted as IgM.
In vivo cell mediated immune response
The cellular immune response was assessed by cutaneous basophilic hypersensitivity test in vivo by using phyto hemagglutinin lectin from Phaseolus vulgaris (PHA-P). Birds were injected intra dermally between 3rd and 4th toe of the right foot or on the wattle with 0.1 mg PHA-P in 0.1 ml of PBS (1 mg PHA-P/ml of PBS). The left foot received 0.1 ml of PBS and served as control. The thickness of inter-digital skin or wattle was measured using micrometer (AMES) at 0 and 24 h after injection. The skin swelling was calculated by substracting the skin thickness at 0 h from that of after 24 h of injection. The foot web index (FI) or wattle index was determined as the difference between inter-digital or wattle swelling values of PHA-P injected and control foot or wattle.
FI or Wattle index (in mm) = (thickness after 24 hinjection of PHA-P of right foot or wattle-thickness before injection of the same foot or wattle) - (thickness after 24 h of injection of PBS of left foot or wattle - thickness before 24 h of injection of PBS of the same foot or wattle).
Statistical analysis
Data obtained were subjected to analysis completely randomized design with the simple analysis of variance technique [13] using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences [14]. Homogenous subsets were separated using Duncan's multiple range test described by Duncan [15]. Differences among treatments were considered to be significant when p≤0.05.
Results and Discussion
Chemical composition of experimental diet
The chemical composition of Azolla meal and experimental diet is given in Table-2. The proximate principles, i.e., DM, organic matter, total ash, CP, EE, CF and nitrogen free extract (NFE) of Azolla meal were found to be 9.88%, 78.33%, 21.67%, 25.64%, 3.15%, 17.29% and 32.25%, respectively. The cell wall constituents, i.e. neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber and Ca and P contents of Azolla meal were found to be 51.15%, 43.38% and 11.12%, 5.91%, respectively. The chemical composition of Azolla was comparable with the previous observations of different scientists [16-22]. The experimental diet fulfilled all the nutrient requirement of broiler birds according to BIS [8] CF content of Azolla replaced diet was found higher than control as Azolla contained more fiber. The mineral content and CPincreased gradually with increasing replacement of basal diet with Azolla meal. This was due to more mineral and protein content of Azolla meal than the basal diet, whereas the EE decreased slightly in Azolla replaced diet. Similar to our findings, the CP content of Azolla meal was reported in the range of 21.4-25.78% [16-18]. In contrary to this, Ali and Leeson [23] obtained lower CP content of 16.5-17.67% in Azolla meal. The 17.29% crude fiber obtained in the present study is slightly higher than the findings of Parthasarathy et al. [24] who reported the CF content of Azolla in the range of 13.19-16.54%. The EE content of Azolla in the present study (3.15%) is almost similar to the earlier observations of Bolka and Kumar et al. [16,17], who reported an EE content of 3.0-3.5%. Total ash content of Azolla obtained in this experiment was 21.67%. Ali and Leeson [23] reported a very high value of 36.12% ash in Azolla. However, other workers [6] recorded values almost similar to the present study. The NFE content of 32.25% recorded in this study was lower than the value reported by Parthasarathy et al. [24] as 38.85 to 44.06% NFE in Azolla. Parthasarathy et al. [24] also indicated that Azolla microphylla contained 2.11% calcium. Whereas, Ali and Leeson [23] found 0.31% phosphorus in Azolla. Both values are comparable to our findings. The variations in the nutrient composition of Azolla meal in different studies could be attributed to differences in the response of Azolla strains to environmental conditions such as temperature, light intensity, and soil nutrients which consequently affect their growth morphology and composition. Moreover, species difference of Azolla could alter their nutrient composition. Furthermore, contamination with epiphytic algae could also be important to such a degree as to affect the results of chemical composition.
Table-2.
Attributes | Experimental diet | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Starter | Finisher | Azolla | |||||||
C | T1 | T2 | T3 | C | T1 | T2 | T3 | ||
DM | 886.5 | 891.0 | 873.8 | 881.8 | 864.5 | 881.9 | 883.4 | 891.4 | 98.8 |
ASH | 151.8 | 173.5 | 179.4 | 191.1 | 153.6 | 169.2 | 183.0 | 190.5 | 216.7 |
CP | 231.6 | 233.4 | 237.9 | 240.0 | 196.8 | 199.9 | 202.2 | 206.9 | 256.4 |
EE | 43.2 | 33.3 | 38.7 | 32.9 | 56.2 | 44.3 | 44.9 | 43.8 | 31.5 |
CF | 40.1 | 40.9 | 41.2 | 43.0 | 43.9 | 44.2 | 44.9 | 45.8 | 172.9 |
NFE | 533.3 | 518.9 | 502.8 | 493.0 | 549.5 | 542.4 | 525.2 | 508.5 | 322.5 |
NDF | 303.0 | 311.9 | 335.0 | 310.0 | 356.7 | 339.9 | 330.1 | 345.1 | 511.5 |
ADF | 112.7 | 92.2 | 100.7 | 109.3 | 122.2 | 114.5 | 119.8 | 129.1 | 433.8 |
Ca | 13.8 | 16.0 | 16.9 | 17.2 | 10.2 | 13.4 | 14.0 | 14.6 | 111.2 |
P | 9.7 | 10.5 | 10.9 | 11.4 | 9.0 | 9.8 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 59.1 |
DM=Dry matter, CP=Crude protein, EE=Ether extract, CF=Crude fiber, NFE=Nitrogen free extract, ADF=Acid detergent fiber, NDF=Neutral detergent fiber
Blood biochemical parameters
All blood biochemical viz. glucose, creatinine, cholesterol, total protein, albumin, uric acid and triglycerides were found similar to control (Table-3) and within the normal reported values for broiler chicken [25]. The results showed that the treatment did not affect the plasma glucose concentration as the obtained values being in normal range [26]. Furthermore, indicated that carbohydrate metabolism was not affected by the diet [27]. It is known that triglycerides are important energetic products particularly used by chicks for growth performance [28,29]. But our study reflected no change in triglyceride content of blood. Total plasma proteins are a common parameter utilized to estimate the avian body condition. Moreover, albumin, one of the main serum proteins, serves as the most favorable source of amino acids for synthesis of tissue proteins [30]. Similar total protein and albumin content in the blood of all the treatment groups in our study represented normal body condition of all the experimental groups. Creatinine is another important indicator of protein metabolism, a by-product of phosphocreatine breakdown in skeletal muscle. Its concentration is directly proportional to muscle mass, related to age, physical activity and like the majority of blood chemistry constituents, is influenced by diet [31]. In our study, the plasma levels of albumin and creatinine were not affected by treatment and was found within physiological normal values [32].
Table-3.
Treatment | Glucose (mg/dl) | Creatinine (mg/dl) | Cholesterol (mg/dl) | Total protein (g/dl) | Albumin (g/dl) | Uric acid (mg/dl) | Tryglycerides (mg/dl) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 265.75 | 0.32 | 131.00 | 3.42 | 1.71 | 4.51 | 55.25 |
T2 | 261.25 | 0.34 | 131.75 | 3.40 | 1.73 | 4.64 | 56.75 |
T3 | 270.00 | 0.33 | 134.00 | 3.68 | 1.73 | 4.66 | 56.75 |
T4 | 265.00 | 0.34 | 135.00 | 3.52 | 1.67 | 4.47 | 56.25 |
SEM | 4.02 | 0.02 | 3.66 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 1.20 |
p value | 0.24 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.79 |
SEM=Standard error of mean
Hematological parameter
All the hematological values were found similar between treatment groups except heterophil and lymphocyte which were found higher in T2 and T3 groups and eosinophil was found higher in T3 group than control (Table-4). The values of hematological indices obtained in this study were within the normal ranges reported by Anon [25] indicating that the birds were adequately nourished and thus not anemic or showing any sign of disease infection or parasitic problems. The heretophil: Lymphocyte (H:L) ratio quantifies the balance between the non-specific, fast acting defenses of heterophils and the antigen specific, slower-acting defenses of lymphocytes [33]. Therefore, H:L ratio is considered as a sensitive hematological indicator of stress response among chickens’ populations [34] and as a general biomarker relevant to immune function [33] in poultry. In the present study, similar H:L ratio in control and Azolla fed birds represented similar immune response and no stress due to Azolla supplementation.
Table-4.
Treatment | Hb (g/dl) | PCV (%) | TLC (count/μL)×103 | DLC % | H:L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heterophil | Eosinophil | Lymphocyte | Monocyte | |||||
T1 | 11.13 | 34.71 | 18.17 | 24.66a | 1.93a | 55.38a | 6.89 | 0.44 |
T2 | 11.75 | 37.36 | 20.69 | 29.72b | 2.10a | 65.02b | 8.82 | 0.46 |
T3 | 12.00 | 34.67 | 21.26 | 29.75b | 2.72b | 63.86b | 8.79 | 0.47 |
T4 | 11.50 | 34.89 | 19.37 | 27.21ab | 1.88a | 60.19ab | 7.90 | 0.45 |
SEM | 0.25 | 1.40 | 1.13 | 1.09 | 0.08 | 2.11 | 0.65 | 0.01 |
p value | 0.13 | 0.49 | 0.26 | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.63 |
Means bearing different superscript in a column differ significantly (p<0.05). SEM=Standard error of mean, Hb=Hemoglobin, PCV=Packed cell volume, TLC=Total leukocytes count, DLC=Differential leukocytes count, H:L=Heretophil:lymphocyte
Liver enzyme and macro mineral status
Liver enzymes and macro mineral content in blood were found similar in all the treatment groups except aspartate aminotransferase (AST) which was found higher in T4 group than control (Table-5). Enzyme activities in birds are variable and originate from different organs. In poultry, AST and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are synthesized in muscle, skeletal and cardiac, and in the second order in the liver [35]. No significant differences between the dietary treatments were noticed for ALT enzymes (p>0.05), the plasma concentration of ALT was within physiological normal values [36,37]. For the differences in AST values, Armand [38] has asserted that fluctuations in the serum levels of AST values are usually very difficult to interpret because of the wide distribution of this enzyme in avian tissues. The AST values obtained in this study, however, fall within the range of 105-143.5 IU/L reported by Anon [25]. Minerals are essential for broiler growth, and they are involved in many digestive, physiological and biosynthetic processes within the body. In the present study, the plasma Ca, P and Mg concentration was in normal range [26,32,36] and not affected by the treatment (p>0.05).
Table-5.
Treatment | AST (IU/L) | ALT (IU/L) | ALP (IU/L) | Ca (mg/dl) | P (mg/dl) | Mg (mg/dl) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 115.22a | 10.33 | 261.00 | 8.28 | 6.43 | 1.75 |
T2 | 118.03a | 10.23 | 257.25 | 8.68 | 6.53 | 2.00 |
T3 | 128.37ab | 10.15 | 255.00 | 8.48 | 6.65 | 1.95 |
T4 | 137.23b | 10.18 | 257.25 | 8.20 | 6.48 | 1.78 |
SEM | 6.46 | 0.31 | 5.06 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
p value | 0.02 | 0.98 | 0.86 | 0.15 | 0.58 | 0.09 |
Means bearing different superscript in a column differ significantly (p<0.05). SEM=Standard error of mean, ALT=Alanine aminotransferase, AST=Aspartate aminotransferase, ALP=Alkaline phosphatase
Immunocompetence traits
The humoral immune responses were found similar in all experimental groups (Table-6). This finding may be supported by similar H:L ratio in control and Azolla fed birds representing similar immune response. The H:L ratio quantifies the balance between the non-specific, fast acting defenses of heterophils and the antigen specific, slower-acting defenses of lymphocytes [33] thus acting as an indicator of stress response among chickens’ populations [34] and as a general biomarker relevant to immune function [33] in poultry. In contrary, Prabinaand Kumar [39] reported higher antibody tire value against Ranikhet virus in birds that were administered with dried Azolla at 10% level in comparison to the birds which took dried Azolla at 7.5% level. Similarly, Dhumal et al. [40] reported feeding Azolla meal in broiler improved the antibody titer values as compared to control group at 35th days of age in commercial broilers. Although antibody titer was found similar in all the experimental groups in the present study, cell-mediate immune response (response to PHA-P) was found higher in T2, T3 and T4 than control(p<0.05) (Table-6). Similar observation was reported by Bhattacharya et al. [41] who fed commercial broiler with 4.5% and 5.5% Azolla meal and found 5.5% replacement group showed higher FI than control.
Table-6.
Treatment | HA | IgG | IgM | Foot web index |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 7.33 | 2.83 | 4.50 | 0.50a |
T2 | 7.50 | 3.50 | 4.00 | 0.65b |
T3 | 8.00 | 3.33 | 4.66 | 0.86c |
T4 | 7.50 | 3.00 | 4.50 | 0.68b |
SEM | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.50 | 0.02 |
p value | 0.62 | 0.43 | 0.80 | <0.01 |
Means bearing different superscript in a column differ significantly (p<0.05). SEM=Standard error of mean, HA=Hemagglutination assay, Ig=Immunoglobulin
Conclusion
It has been observed that Azolla meal can replace commercial broiler feed upto 7.5% level without causing any adverse effect in blood biochemical parameters and hematological parameters. Moreover, higher cell-mediated immune response in Azolla replacement group indicated immune-modulatory effect of Azolla meal. In future, Azolla meal may be used as unconventional feed ingredient in poultry feed to reduce feed cost, especially in backyard poultry farming.
Authors’ Contributions
DBM planned and carried out research work for his MVSc thesis program in collaboration with guide DR and advisory members AB and MK. VK, RK and SV helped DBM in analyzing blood samples for hematological and biochemical parameters. All authors participated in draft and revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We thankfully acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the DUVASU, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh for carrying out this research work.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST) Ames, Iowa: Issue Paper, 53. CAST; 2013. Animal Feed vs. Human Food: Challenges and Opportunities in Sustaining Animal Agriculture toward 2050. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Van Hove C, Lejeune A. Does Azolla have any future in agriculture? In: Rahman M, Podder A.K, Van Hove C, Znt B, Heulin T, Hartmann A, editors. Biological Nitrogen Fixation Associated with Rice Production. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. pp. 83–94. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Raja W, Rathaur P, Suchit A.J, Ramteke P.R. Azolla: An aquatic pteridophyte with great potential. Int. J. Res. Biol. Sci. 2012;2(2):68–72. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sood A, Uniyal P.L, Prasanna R, Ahluwalia A.S. Phytoremediation potential of aquatic macrophyte, Azolla. Ambio. 2012;41(2):122–137. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0159-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yadav R.K.G, Abraham Y, Singh V, Singh P.K. Advancements in the utilization of Azolla anabaena system in relation to sustainable agricultural practices. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 2014;80(2):301–316. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alalade O.A, Iyayi E.A. Chemical composition and the feeding value of Azolla (Azollapinnata) meal for egg-type chicks. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006;5(2):137–141. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Balaji K, Jalaludeen A, Churchil R.R, Peethambaran P.A, Senthil K.S. Effect of dietary inclusion of Azolla (Azollapinnata) on production performance of broiler chicken. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 2009;44(2):195–198. [Google Scholar]
- 8.BIS. Bureau of Indian Standards. 4th Review. New Delhi, India: ManakBhawan, 9, Bahadur Shah ZafarMarg; 1992. Indian Standard, Poultry Feeds Specifications. [Google Scholar]
- 9.AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Washington D.C: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Van Soest P.J, Robertson J.B. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human food. In: James W.P.T, Theander O, editors. The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Foods. New York: Marcel, Dekker; 1981. pp. 123–158. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Siegel P.B, Gross W.B. Production and persistency of antibodies in chickens to sheep erythrocytes. 1. Directional selection. Poult. Sci. 1980;59:1–5. doi: 10.3382/ps.0590205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Martin A, Gross W.B, Siegel P.B. IgG and IgM responses in high and low antibody selected lines of chickens. J. Hered. 1989;80:249–252. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Snedecor G.W, Cochran W.G. Statistical Methods. 9th ed. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa, State University Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 14.SPSS. USA: IBM SPSS Inc; 2011. Statistics Version 20.0. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Duncan D.B. Multiple range and F-test. Biometrics. 1955;11:1–42. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bolka P.C. Ph.D Thesis. Bidar: Karnataka Veterinary Animal and Fisheries Sciences University; 2011. Nutritional evaluation of azolla (Azollapinnata) in broilers and layers. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kumar D.S, Prasad R.M.V, Kishore K.R, Rao E.R. Effect of azolla (Azollapinnata) based concentrate mixture on nutrient utilization in buffalo bulls. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2012;46:268–271. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kumarasinghe K.S, Eskew D.L. Isotopic Studies of Azolla and Nitrogen Fertilization of Rice. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science &Business Media; 2012. pp. 24–31. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cherryl D.M, Prasad R.M.V, JagadeeswaraRao S, Jayalaxmi P, Srinivas Kumar D. A study on the nutritive value of Azollapinnata. Livest. Res. Int. 2014;2(1):13–15. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Veerabahu C, Radhika D, Mohaideen A, Indrani S, Priya R. Phytochemical and biochemical profiles of Azollamicrophylla cultured with organic manure. Int. J. Curr. Agric. Res. 2015;4(8):131–133. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bhaskaran S.K, Kannapan P. Nutritional composition of four different species of Azolla. Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 2015;5(3):6–12. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Parashuramulu S, Swain P.S, Nagalakshmi D. Protein fractionation and in vitro digestibility of Azolla in ruminants. Online J. Anim. Feed Res. 2013;3(3):129–132. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ali M.A, Leeson S. Nutritional value and aquatic weeds in the diet of poultry. World Poult. Sci. J. 1995;50:239–251. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Parthasarathy R, Kadirvel R, Kathaperumal V. Chemical evaluation of Azolla as poultry feed ingredient. Cheiron. 2001;30:35–37. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Anon. Vol. 1. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Council of Animal Care; 1980. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals; pp. 85–90. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Clinical Diagnostic Division. Veterinary Reference Guide. Rochester, New York: Eastman Kodak Company; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gonzalez-Barranco J, Rios-Torres J.M. Early malnutrition and metabolic abnormalities later in dietary protein levels on growth and muscle protein life. Nutr. Rev. 2004;62:134–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhan X.A, Wang M, Ren H, Zhao R.Q, Li J.X, Tan Z.L. Effect of early feed restriction on metabolic programming and compensatory growth in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2007;86:654–660. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.4.654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Obikaonu H.O, Okoli I.C, Opara M.N, Okoro V.M.O, Ogbuewu I.P, Etuk E.B, Udedibie A.B.I. Haematological and serum biochemical indices of starter broilers fed leaf meal of neem (Azadirachtaindica) J. Agric. Technol. 2012;8(1):71–79. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yaman M.A, Kita K, Okumura J. Different responses of protein synthesis to refeeding in various muscles of fasted chicks. Br. Poult. Sci. 2000;41:224–228. doi: 10.1080/00071660050022317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Szabo A, Mézes M, Horn P, Sütö Z, Bázár G.Y, Romvári R. Developmental dynamics of some blood biochemical parameters in the growing turkey (Meleagrisgallopavo) Acta Vet. Hung. 2005;53:397–409. doi: 10.1556/AVet.53.2005.4.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ritchie B.W, Harrison G.J, Harrison L.R. Avian Medicine: Principles and Application. Florida: Wingers Publishing, Inc; 1994. p. 1341. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shaniko S. Physiological responses of laying hens to the alternative housing systems. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2003;2:357–360. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Graczyk S, Pliszczak-Krol A, Kotonski B, Wilczek J, Chmielak Z. Examinations of haematological and metabolic changes mechanisms of acute stress in turkeys. Electron. J. Pol. Agric. Univ, Vet. Med. 2003;6:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brugere-Picoux J, Brugere H, Basset I, Sayad N, Vaast J, Michaux J.M. Clinical biochemistry in avian pathology. Value and limitations of enzyme assays in the laying hen. Rec. Méd. Vét. 1987;163:1091–1099. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Abdi-Hachesoo B, Talebi A, Asri-Rezaei S. Comparative study on blood profiles of indigenous and Ross-308 broiler breeders. Glob. Vet. 2011;7(3):238–241. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kudair I.M, Al-Hussary N.A.J. Effect of vaccination on some biochemical parameters in broiler chickens. Iraq. J. Vet. Sci. 2010;24(2):59–64. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Armand W.B. Avian Clinical Haematology and Blood Chemistry. 2nd ed. Philedelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders; 1986. pp. 264–276. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Prabina B.J, Kumar K. Dried Azolla as a nutritionally rich cost effective and immune-modulatory feed supplement for broilers. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 2010;5(1):20–22. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dhumal M.V, Siddiqui M.V, Siddiqui M.B.A, Avai P.E. Performance of broilers fed on different levels of Azolla meal. Indian. J. Poult. Sci. 2009;44(1):65–68. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bhattacharya A, Shukla P.K, Roy D, Shukla M. Effect of feeding Azolla (Azollapinnata) on growth and immunocompetence of commercial broilers. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Proceeding of 9th International Poultry Show and Seminar Organized by World's Poultry Science Association; 2015. p. 16. [Google Scholar]