Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunobiol. 2016 Feb 27;1(1):106.

Keep Eyes on Integrins

Zhichao Fan 1, Wei Liu 2
PMCID: PMC4819984  NIHMSID: NIHMS770375  PMID: 27054197

Integrins

Integrins are conformation-regulated adhesion molecules, which play essential roles in many biological processes, especially for immunity [1]. Structurally, integrins are a group of heterodimeric transmembrane receptors, which contain α subunit and β subunit.

In mammals, there are 18 kinds of α subunit and 8 kinds of β subunit were discovered, which form 24 combinations (Table 1) [2,3]. Overall, these 24 kinds of integrins can be divided to two groups by containing α-I domain (Table 1 and Figure 1A) or not (Table 1 and Figure 1B). Integrin can regulate its ligand-binding affinity by conformational changes [1]. The adaptor proteins and signal pathways were broadly studied, as discussed in ref 1 [1].

Table 1.

Type of integrins discovered,

α subunit (CD name) β subunit (CD name) Alternative name
α1 (CD49a)* β1 (CD29) VLA-1
α2 (CD49b)* β1 (CD29) VLA-2
α3 (CD49c) β1 (CD29) VLA-3
α4 (CD49d) β1 (CD29) VLA-4
α5 (CD49e) β1 (CD29) VLA-5
α6 β1 (CD29) VLA-6
α7 β1 (CD29) N.A.
α8 β1 (CD29) N.A.
α9 β1 (CD29) RLC
α10* β1 (CD29) N.A.
α11* β1 (CD29) N.A.
αL (CD11a)* β2 (CD18) LFA-1
αM (CD11b)* β2 (CD18) Mac-1
αX (CD11c)* β2 (CD18) p150, 95
αD (CD11d)* β2 (CD18) N.A.
αIIb (CD41) β3 (CD61) GPIIbIIIa
αV (CD51) β3 (CD61) vitronectin receptor
α6 β4 (CD104) N.A.
αV (CD51) β5 N.A.
αV (CD51) β6 N.A.
α4 (CD49d) β7 LPAM-1
αE (CD103)* β7 HML-1
αV (CD51) β8 N.A.
*

These α subunits have α I domain.

CD means cluster of differentiation; VLA means very late activation antigen; RLC means regulatory light chains; LFA means lymphocyte function-associated antigen; Mac means Macrophage antigen; GP means glycoprotein; LPAM means lymphocyte Peyer’s patch adhesion molecule; HML means Human intestinal lymphocyte; N.A. means not applicable.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structural schematic of the extended integrins. (A) Integrins with α I domain. α chain green, β chain purple; (B) Integrins without α I domain. α chain orange, β chain purple; Subdomains and headpiece/tailpiece portions labeled. TM means transmembrane domain.

Integrins are one of the most important adhesion molecules mediating cell-cell interactions and cell-extracellular matrix interactions. In immunity, integrins play critical roles in leukocyte adhesion from blood flow [1,46] cell migration [7], immunological synapse [8,9] and phagocytosis [10]. Thousands of scientific studies (PubMed: 63538 total, 18067 in immunology catalog; Web of Science: 236304 total, 52308 in immunology catalog) were presented up to data. When plotting the number of integrin studies by time (Figure 2), we can see the number of integrin-relevant studies was raised at 1980s, and become more popular in 1990s. In the last 15 years, integrin studies were continuously popular and got the most publications came out at 2012 (Figures 2A and B). When we see this statistics in immunology catalog, they presented similar trends (Figures 2C and D). Unfortunately, there’s a remarkable number decrease of the integrin-relevant paper in the field of immunology from 2015 to date. This indicates that integrin study reach a bottleneck after the boom when techniques of structure biology [11,12] and advanced microscopy [13,14] were introduced into the integrin field.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Statistics of the publications relevant to integrins. (A) Data showing the number of integrin-relevant publications per year pulling out from the PubMed; (B) Data showing the number of integrin-relevant publications per year pulling out from the Web of Science; (C) Data showing the number of integrin-relevant publications per year in the immunology catalog pulling out from the PubMed; (D) Data showing the number of integrin-relevant publications per year in the immunology catalog pulling out from the Web of Science.

When focusing on the number of integrin studies on top-ranked journals in the field of immunology (5 journals were selected here including Nature, Science, Cell, Immunity and Nature Immunology), it presented that integrin study became a cutting-edge at early 2000s, most hot in 2002–2004, and continuously being concerned after that (Figure 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Statistics of publications relevant to integrins on top immunology-relevant journals. (A) Data showing the number of integrin-relevant publications per year in Nature, Science, Cell, Immunity and Nature Immunology; (B) Data showing the number of integrin-relevant publications per year in Nature, Science, and Cell; (C) Data showing the number of integrin-relevant publications per year in Immunity and Nature Immunology.

When separating the integrin publication number from Nature, Science and Cell (representing the broad influences to the frontier scientific field, figure 3B) with that from Immunity and Nature Immunology (representing the influences to the frontier immunology field, figure 3C), it showed that integrins were quite popular in the frontier scientific field around 2003 (Figure 3B), and relatively lost concerns after 2010. One the other hand, integrin studies were popular from 2002 to 2014 in the frontier immunology field, whereas the manias seemed taking over after 2015.

In conclusion, integrin studies are keep concerned from late 1980s, and came to the forefront of the scientific community in early 2000s by introducing frontier techniques. Over the past decade, many studies about the regulation of integrin structure, pathway of integrin activation and integrin roles in immunity were emerged and made integrin as the most understood adhesion receptors. However, it seems that integrin enthusiasm was faded away since 2015. Actually, although integrins were vast investigated, there are many controversies, questions and holes remain. Immunologists, it is far away to see goodbye to integrins and please keep your eyes on them.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by funding from National Institutes of Health, USA (NIH, HL078784).

References

  • 1.Fan Z, Ley K. Leukocyte arrest: Biomechanics and molecular mechanisms of β2 integrin activation. Biorheology. 2015;52:353–377. doi: 10.3233/BIR-15085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Byron A, Humphries JD, Askari JA, Craig SE, Mould AP, et al. Anti-integrin monoclonal antibodies. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:4009–4011. doi: 10.1242/jcs.056770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Luo BH, Carman CV, Springer TA. Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:619–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lefort CT, Ley K. Neutrophil arrest by LFA-1 activation. Front Immunol. 2012;3:157. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alon R, Ley K. Cells on the run: shear-regulated integrin activation in leukocyte rolling and arrest on endothelial cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:525–532. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ley K, Laudanna C, Cybulsky MI, Nourshargh S. Getting to the site of inflammation: the leukocyte adhesion cascade updated. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:678–689. doi: 10.1038/nri2156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huttenlocher A, Horwitz AR. Integrins in cell migration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:a005074. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lin W, Suo Y, Deng Y, Fan Z, Zheng Y, et al. Morphological change of CD4(+) T cell during contact with DC modulates T-cell activation by accumulation of F-actin in the immunology synapse. BMC Immunol. 2015;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12865-015-0108-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin JX, Fan ZY, Lin Q, Wu DH, Wu XY, et al. A comparison of dioctahedral smectite and iodine glycerin cream with topical mouth rinse in treatment of chemotherapy induced oral mucositis: a pilot study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015;19:136–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Freeman SA, Goyette J, Furuya W, Woods EC, Bertozzi CR, et al. Integrins Form an Expanding Diffusional Barrier that Coordinates Phagocytosis. Cell. 2016;164:128–140. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xiong JP, Stehle T, Diefenbach B, Zhang R, Dunker R, et al. Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin alpha Vbeta3. Science. 2001;294:339–345. doi: 10.1126/science.1064535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Takagi J, Petre BM, Walz T, Springer TA. Global conformational rearrangements in integrin extracellular domains in outside-in and inside-out signaling. Cell. 2002;110:599–511. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00935-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim M, Carman CV, Springer TA. Bidirectional transmembrane signaling by cytoplasmic domain separation in integrins. Science. 2003;301:1720–1725. doi: 10.1126/science.1084174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dustin ML, Shaw AS. Costimulation: building an immunological synapse. Science. 1999;283:649–650. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5402.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES