Abstract
Radiosynthesis and in vitro evaluation of [18F](S)-1-(4-((5-cyclopropyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)amino)pyrrolo[ 2,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-2-yl)-N-(6-fluoropyridin-3-yl)-2-methylpyrrolidine-2-carboxamide ([18F]BMS-754807 or [18F]1) a specific IGF-1R inhibitor was performed. [18F]1 demonstrated specific binding in vitro to human cancer tissues. Synthesis of reference standard 1 and corresponding bromo derivative (1a), the precursor for radiolabeling were achieved from 2,4-dichloropyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazine (4) in three steps with 50% overall yield. The radioproduct was obtained in 8% yield by reacting 1a with [18F]TBAF in DMSO at 170 °C at high radiochemical purity and specific activity (1–2 Ci/μmol, N = 10). The proof of concept of IGF-IR imaging with [18F]1 was demonstrated by in vitro autoradiography studies using pathologically identified surgically removed grade IV glioblastoma, breast cancer and pancreatic tumor tissues. These studies indicate that [18F]1 can be a potential PET tracer for monitoring IGF-1R.
Keywords: IGF-1R, Radiotracer, PET, Phosphor imaging
Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs or IGF-I and IGF-II) are growth hormones that have high sequence homology to insulin and function as regulators of cellular proliferation, apoptosis, energy metabolism and various organ-specific functions.1,2 The functions of IGFs are mediated through two tyrosine kinase receptors IGF-1R, IGF-2R and IGF binding proteins (IGF-BP).3,4 Overexpression of IGF-1R has been found in many cancers affecting multiple aspects of malignancy and metastases. These include mesenchymal, epithelial and hematopoietic classes of a wide variety of tumors/ cancers.5–12 In addition, a role in brain development and normal brain functions, alterations of IGF-1R are also found in Alzheimer’s Disease, traumatic brain injury, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Fredreich Ataxia and aging.13–18 IGF-1R overexpression has also been reported in brain tumors such as glioblastoma, neuroblastoma, astrocytomas, meningiomas and medulloblastoma.19–22 The biological roles of IGF-1R in malignancy have been demonstrated by preclinical, epidermological and clinical studies.6–8,23,24 IGF-IR is a potential therapeutic target and there are several active clinical trials evaluating anti IGF-1R effects in various diseases.6–8 These agents include antibodies for IGF-I, monoclonal antibodies for IGF-1R, small molecule targeting tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors (TKRIs) and ligand binding antibodies and antisense oligonucleotides. Although clinical trials with at least six monoclonal antibody based IGF-1R therapy are still under preclinical and phases I–III clinical evaluation, many clinical trials based on antibody based IGF-1R therapy reported negative results and safety concerns.25–30 There is a growing interest in the development of small molecule TKRIs inhibitors of IGF-1R.10,24 Several small molecules based on TKRIs are in various phases of clinical investigations (phases I–III).7–11 The identification of noninvasive biomarkers would enable detection and quantification of IGF-1R in vivo to monitor target occupancy and treatment responses and accelerate development of medications that target IGF.
To date, five major classes of ligands have been considered for IGF-1R imaging including proteins, antibodies, peptides, affibodies and small molecule TKRIs.23 SPECT ligands based on I125 analogues of IGF-I were not successful in in vivo imaging IGF-I due to high protein binding and in vivo deiodination.23 In vivo imaging of IGF-1R with 111In-IGF1(E3R) in a mouse breast cancer xenograft tumor model shows good tumor contrast, a strong linear correlation with in vitro and in vivo IGF-1R expression level and tracer uptake. 23 R1507, a monoclonal antibody in human was radiolabeled with PET and SPECT isotopes (111In, 89Zr and 125I) and tested in tumor model.31 Higher tumor uptake of 111In-R1507 and 89Zr-R1507 was observed in comparison to that of 125I-R1507.32 111In-R1507 SPECT has also been utilized to predict the response to anti-IGF-1R therapy in human bone sarcoma xenografts.33 Although antibody based imaging is successful in mice models, its translation to human study is not practical as the imaging probe requires days for equilibration, and offer poor target/nontarget contrast due to the expression of IGF-1R in normal tissues. There have been unsuccessful attempts to image IGF-1R antibodies with quantum dots using fluorescent techniques.23,34,35 IGF-1R based PNA has been recently radiolabeled with 64Cu and 99mTc and tested in IGF-1R overexpressing breast cancer xenografts in mice.36,37 A few radioligands based on IGF-1R selected antibody have been labeled with 111In and show modest tumor uptake and tumor to blood ratio. 38 Recently, [18F]FDG and [18F]FLT have been employed to access response to IGF-1R inhibitors in preclinical and human subjects.39–41
Some of the ligands listed above show promise for imaging IGF-1R, but do not cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) and hence are limited to use in imaging studies outside the brain. To quantify binding to IGF-1R in brain requires development of selective non-peptide PET ligands. High affinity, lipophilic TKRIs of IGF-1R are potential candidates for developing such imaging agents. We have screened a large number of TKRIs for this purpose and identified BMS-754807 as a small molecule dual inhibitor of IGF-1R/insulin receptor (IR), that has been clinical evaluation, as a lead ligand for imaging using PET.42–44 BMS-754807 (1) is an orally bioavailable, potent and reversible small molecule inhibitor of the IGF-1R/IR family kinases (Ki <2 nmol/L), which is currently in phase II clinical trial for the treatment of a variety of human cancers.42–46 The selectivity of compound 1 over other kinases, presence of metabolically stable fluorine in the 2-substituted pyridine ring, which is amenable for radiolabeling using nucleophilic displacement with [18F]fluoride47 and a calculated lipophilicity (clogP) 3.5, prompted us to choose it as a candidate radiotracer for imaging IGF-1R with PET.
BMS-754807 (1) and the corresponding bromo precursor (1a) for radiosynthesis, were prepared based on modification of a published procedure.45 Preferential displacement of the C-4 chloride in compound 4 with 5-cyclopropyl-1H-pyrazol-3-amine (5) followed by displacement at C-2 position with (S)-2-methylpyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid gave the corresponding carboxylic acid 7 in two steps with 65% yield. The carboxylic acid was then condensed with 6-bromopyridin-3-amine or 6-fluoropyridin-3-amine to yield the precursor 1a or the standard 1 in 78–70% yield (Scheme 1).48 Radiosynthesis of [18F]BMS-754807 was initially optimized by exchange reaction with cold BMS-754807 under microwave conditions using [18F]KF/K222. However, the bromo precursor 1a did not undergo radiofluorination using [18F]KF/K222 under thermal or microwave conditions (Scheme 1). However, the radioproduct was obtained in 8% yield by treating bromo precursor 1a with [18F]TBAF in DMSO at 170 °C in high radiochemical purity (>95%) and specific activity (1–2 Ci/μmol).49 Nucleophilic aromatic radiofluorination via the displacement of 2-bromo pyridyl system without using catalyst is widely reported in literature.47 [18F]TBAF was in situ generated from freshly prepared tetrabutylammonium bicarbonate by azeotropic distillation with [18F]fluoride. Tetrabutylammonium bicarbonate in turn was freshly prepared by bubbling carbon dioxide from dry ice into tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (4 mL, 13% by weight in water, 0.5 M) for 4 h at room temperature. The radioproduct was stable in 10% ethanol–saline solution for over 6 h. The experimental partition coefficient (logP) of [18F]1 was measured as 2.8, indicating that the radioligand has adequate lipophilicity for brain imaging.50
Scheme 1.
Synthesis and radiosynthesis of BMS-754807 and [18F]BMS-754807.
After optimizing the synthesize of [18F]1, the proof of concept of IGF-1R imaging with the radiotracer was performed in surgically removed and pathologically identified grade IV-glioblastoma, breast cancer and pancreatic tumor using phosphor imager autoradiography (Fig. 1).51–53 Pathologically identified frozen sections of glioblastoma IV, pancreatic tumor and breast cancer were used for phosphor image studies. The slide mounted tumor sections were brought to room temperature and incubated with [18F]1 (0.1 nM) for 1 h.54 The adjacent sections were incubated with 1 μM of GSK1838705A, a specific IGF-1R ligand to determine nonspecific binding. After incubation, sections were washed, dried and exposed to phosphor imaging screen. As evident from Figure 1, there is specific binding of [18F]1 in the three tumor/cancer tissues tested. Grade IV gliobalstoma shows higher tracer uptake and specific binding in comparison to pancreatic tumor and breast cancer tissues. The binding rations of total verses non-specific binding obtained are 5.25 (N = 9), 1.92 (N = 4) and 1.7 (N = 4) for grade IV glioblastoma, pancreatic tumor and breast cancer, respectively.
Figure 1.

Phosphor image of [18F]1 in surgically removed cancer tissues. Column 1: total binding of [18F]1 in glioblastoma IV sections; column 2: nonspecific binding of [18F]1 in glioblastoma IV sections; column 3: total binding of [18F]1 in pancreatic tumor sections; column 4: nonspecific binding of [18F]1 in pancreatic tumor sections; column 5: total binding of [18F]1 in breast cancer tissues; column 6: nonspecific binding of [18F]1 in breast cancer tissues.
In summary, we successfully synthesized [18F]1, a potential imaging agent for IFG-1R. The total time required for radiosynthesis was 60 min from EOS in 8% yield with excellent chemical and radiochemical purities and specific activity. Autoradiography studies by phosphor imaging indicate that [18F]1 binds to IGF-1R of surgically removed postmortem human glioblastoma grade IV, breast cancer and pancreatic tumor tissues. [18F]BMS-754807 is the first small molecule radioligand that showed promise for imaging IGF-1R in tumor/cancer. The results indicate that [18F]BMS-754807 can be a potential PET imaging agent for in vivo monitoring IGF-1R.
Acknowledgments
We thank Tissue Bank, Herbert Irving Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York for providing tumor tissues.
References and notes
- 1.Maki RG. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4985. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.5040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yee D, editor. Insulin-like Growth Factors. IOS Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Conover CA. Endocr J. 1996:S43. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.43.suppl_s43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Foulstone E, Prince S, Zaccheo O, Burns JL, Harper J, Jacobs C, Church D, Hassan AB. J Pathol. 2005;205:145. doi: 10.1002/path.1712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gombos A, Metzger FO, Lago LD, Awada-Hussein A. Invest New Drugs. 2012;30(4):1690.18. doi: 10.1007/s10637-012-9811-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hewish M, Chau I, Cunningham D. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2009;4:54. doi: 10.2174/157489209787002515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.LeRoith D, editor. Cancer Drug Discov Dev. Springer Science; 2011 and 2012. Insulin-like growth factors and cancer: from basic biology to therapeutics. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ozkan EE. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011;344:1. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gualberto A, Pollak M. Oncogene. 2009;28:3009. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yee D. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(13):975. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gao J, Chang YS, Jallal B. Cancer Res. 2012;73:3. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Heidegger I, Pircher A, Klocker K, Massoner P. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011;11(8):701. doi: 10.4161/cbt.11.8.14689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Duarte AI, Moreira PI, Oliveira PR. J Aging Res. 2012;21 doi: 10.1155/2012/384017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/384017. Article ID 384017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moll L, Zemva J, Schubert M, Akin F. Basic and Clinical Endocrinology Up-to-Date. In Tech; New York: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bondy C, Cheng C, Zhong J, Le W-H, Lajtha A, Lim R, editors. Handbook of Neurochemistry and Molecular Neurobiology. Vol. 1 Springer; New York: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gasparini L, Xu H. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:404. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00163-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Christian L, Massimo S, Alessandro P, Paolo M, Elena D, Massimiliano R, Jenny S, Clarissa C, Maurizio M, Massimo C, Vincenzo S. Muscle Nerve. 2012;45(2):200. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sullivan KA, Kim B, Feldman EL. Endocrinology. 2008;149(12):5963. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim SY, Toretsky JA, Scher D, Helman LJ. Oncologist. 2009;14:83. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bielen A, Perryman L, Box GM, et al. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10:1407. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huse JT, Holland EC. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:319. doi: 10.1038/nrc2818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen MY, Clark AJ, Chan DC, Ware JL, Holt SE, Chidambaram A, Fillmore HL, Broaddus WC. J Neurooncol. 2011;103(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0374-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xue M, Cao X, Zhong Y, Kuang D, Liu X, Zhao Z, Li H. Curr Pharm Res. 2012;18(20):2901. doi: 10.2174/138161212800672723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gombos A, Metzger FO, Lago LD, Awada-Hussein A. Invest New Drugs. 2012;30(4):1690. doi: 10.1007/s10637-012-9811-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fagan DH, Uselman RR, Sachdev D, Yee D. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3372. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sorenson EJ, Windbank AJ, Mandrekar JN, Bamlet WR, Appel SH, Armon C, Barkhaus PE, Bosch P, Boylan K, David WS, Feldman E, Glass J, Gutmann L, Katz J, King W, Luciano CA, McCluskey LF, Nash S, Newman DS, Pascuzzi RM, Pioro E, Sams LJ, Scelsa S, Simpson EP, Subramony SH, Tiryaki E, Thornton CA. Neurology. 2008;71:1770. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000335970.78664.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Press release from Pfizer: Pfizer discontinues a phase III trail of figitumumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Press release 12/29/2009 and 3/11/2010.
- 28.Jassem J, Langer CJ, Karp DD, Mok T, Benner RJ, Green SJ, Park K, Novello S, Strausz J, Gualberto A. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:15. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sevigny JJ, Ryan JM, van Dyck CH, Peng Y, Lines CR, Nessly ML. Neurology. 2008;71:1702. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000335163.88054.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Weroha SJ, Haluska P. IGF-1 receptor inhibitors in clinical trials-early lessons. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2008;13:471. doi: 10.1007/s10911-008-9104-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang Y, Cai W. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;2(2):259. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cornelissen B, McLarty K, Kersemans V, Reilly RM. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35:645. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Heskamp S, van Laarhoven HW, Molkenboer-Kuenen JD, Franssen GM, Versleijen-Jonkers YM, Oyen WJ, Van der Graaf WT, Boerman OC. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1565. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.075648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fleuren ED, Versleijen-Jonkers YM, van de Luijtgaarden AC, Molkenboer-Kuenen JD, Heskamp S, Roeffen MH, van Laarhoven HW, Houghton PJ, Oyen WJ, Boerman OC, van der Graaf WT. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7693. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang H, Sachdev D, Wang C, Hubel A, Gaillard-Kelly M, Yee D. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(2):277. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tian X, Aruva MR, Zhang K, Shanthly N, Cardi CA, Thakur ML, Wickstrom E. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1699. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.042499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tian X, Aruva MR, Qin W, Zhu W, Duffy KT, Sauter ER, Thakur ML, Wickstrom E. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:2070. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tolmachev V, Malmberg J, Hofstrom C, Abrahmsen L, Bergman T, Sjoberg A, Sandstrom M, Graslund T, Orlova A. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:90. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.090829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Desai J, Solomon B, Davis ID, Lipton L, Scott AM, Hicks RJ, Hayes W, Finckenstein FG. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8(12) http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-09-A109. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Soundararajan A, Abraham J, Nelon LD, Prajapati SI, Zarzabal LA, Michalek JE, McHardy SF, Hawkins DS, Malempati S, Keller C. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;59(3):485. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chow PL, Ho CP, Kan D, Attar R, Graf F, Carboni JM, Galbraith SM, Lee FY, Gottardis MM, Krishnan BS. J Clin Oncol. 2009:abstract e14501. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hou X, Huang F, Macedo LF, Harrington SC, Reeves KA, Greer A, Brodie A, Gottardis MM, Carboni JM, Haluska P. Cancer Res. 2011;71(24):7597. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kolb EA, Gorlick R, Lock R, Carol H, Morton CL, Keir ST, Reynolds P, Kang MH, Maris PM, Billups C, Smith MA, Houghton PJ. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(4):595. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huang F, Hurlburt W, Greer A, Reeves KA, Hillerman S, Chang H, Fargnoli J, Graf F, Gottardis MM, Carboni JM. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7221. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wittman MD, Carboni JM, Yang Z, Lee FY, Antman M, Attar R, Balimane P, Chang C, Chen C, Discenza L, Frennesson D, Gottardis MM, Greer A, Hurlburt W, Johnson W, Langley DR, Li A, Liu P, Mastalerz P, Mathur A, Menard A, Patel K, Sack J, Sang X, Saulnier M, Smith D, Stefanski K, Trainor G, Velaparthi U, Zhang G, Zimmermann K, Vyas DM. J Med Chem. 2009;52:7360. doi: 10.1021/jm900786r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Carboni JM, Wittman M, Yang Z, Lee F, Greer A, Hurlburt W, Hillerman S, Cao C, Cantor G, Chen C, Discenza L, Menard K, Li A, Trainor G, Vyas DM, Kramer R, Attar R, Gottardis M. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;12:3341. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dolle F, Roeda D, Kuhnast B, Lasne M-C, Tressaud A, Hauffe G, editors. Fluorine in Health: Molecular Imaging, Biomedical Materials and Pharmaceuticals. Elsevier; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 48.BMS-754807 (1) and (S)-N-(6-bromopyridin-3-yl)-1-(4-((5-cyclopropyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)amino)pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triaz-in-2-yl)-2-methylpyrroli-dine-2-carboxamide: (S)-1-(4-((5-cyclopropyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)amino)pyrrolo [2,1-f][1,2,4]tria-zin-2-yl)-2-methylpyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid (0.220 g, 0.6 mmol) in N,N-dimethylformamide (3 mL) was cooled to 5 °C in an ice bath. Thionyl chloride (0.057 ml, 0.78 mmol) was then added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred at 5–20 °C for 1 h. 6-Fluoropyridin-3-amine (0.201 mg, 1.8 mmol) or 6-bromopyridin-3-amine (0.311 g, 1.80 mmol) in 1 mL of DMF was then added in one portion and the reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 24 h. The reaction mixture was then poured into 0.5 N NaHCO3 solution (20 mL). The resulting suspension was then stirred at rt for 1 h. The suspension was then extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL), dried over MgSO4, concentrated and column chromatographed using 50:50 EtOAc/hexane to yield 1 (192 mg, 70%) or 1a as a colorless solid (244 mg, 78%). The spectral data for 1 were identical to that reported for reported compound45 1a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.98 (s, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 7.96–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.48–7.31 (m, 2H), 6.56 (ddd, J = 23.2, 4.8, 2.2 Hz, 2H), 6.19 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.89–3.67 (m, 2H), 2.60 (td, J = 9.9, 8.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.20–1.88 (m, 2H), 1.75 (s, 3H), 1.72–1.67 (m, 1H), 1.34–1.19 (m, 1H), 1.02–0.86 (m, 2H), 0.81–0.58 (m, 2H); HRMS Calcd For C23H25BrN9O (MH+): 522.1365. Found: 522.1376.
- 49.Radiosynthesis of [18F]1: 1–2 mg of 1a in 0.5 mL DMSO was added to a freshly prepared and dried [18F]TBAF. The reaction mixture was heated in a sealed vial for 30 min at 170 °C. The crude product was directly injected into a semi preparative RP-HPLC (phenomenex C18, 10 × 250 mm, 10) and eluted with acetonitrile: 0.1 M ammonium formate solution (45:55) at a flow rate of 10 mL/min. The precursor eluted after 10–11 min during the HPLC analysis. The product fraction with a retention time of 7–8 min based on γ-detector was collected, diluted with 50 mL of deionized water, and passed through a C-18 Sep-Pak® cartridge. Reconstitution of the product in 1 mL of absolute ethanol afforded [18F]1 (8 ± 2% yield, based on [18F]F− at EOS). A portion of the ethanol solution was analyzed by analytical RP-HPLC (Phenomenex, Prodigy ODS(3) 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μ; mobile phase: acetonitrile/0.1 M ammonium formate; 45–55, flow rate: 2 mL/min, retention time: 7 min, wavelength: 254 nm) to determine the specific activity and radiochemical purity. The ethanol solution of [18F]1 was used for further studies.
- 50.Wilson AA, Jin L, Garcia A, DaSilva JN, Houle S. Appl Radiat Isot. 2001;54:203. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8043(00)00269-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Prabhakaran J, Majo VJ, Milak MS, Kassir SA, Palner M, Savenkova L, Mali P, Arango V, Mann JJ, Parsey RV, Kumar JSD. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20:3499. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.04.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Prabhakaran J, Simpson NR, Majo VJ, Kassir SA, Mann JJ, Arango V, Kumar JSD. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012;22:5104. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.05.099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kumar JSD, Prabhakaran J, Arango V, Parsey VR, Underwood MU, Simpson NR, Kassir SA, Majo VJ, Van Heertum RL, Mann JJ. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2004;14:2393. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.In vitro phosphor image with [18F]1: the in vitro experiments were performed using pathologically identified surgically removed glioblastoma grade IV, pancreatic cancer and breast cancer tissues obtained from Tissue bank of Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University. The frozen tumor tissues obtained were sectioned (20 um) were collected onto glass slides. The sections were allowed to dry and stored at −80 °C until use. The phosphor image autoradiography studies were described previously51–53 and were used for the phosphor image studies. Four sections each for total and nonspecific binding were assayed. The slides mounted sections were brought to room temperature and were incubated with 50 mM Tris–HCl, 5 mM of KCl and 150 mM of NaCl at pH 7.4 containing [18F]1 (0.1 nM) for 1 h. The adjacent sections were incubated with 1 μM of GSK1838705A for 1 h to determine non specific binding. After the incubation, sections were washed with ice-cold buffer containing 50 mM Tris–buffer (pH 7.4) at 4 °C and briefly dipped in ice-cold water to remove salts. Slides were quickly dried under a stream of cold air and exposed to a phosphor-imaging screen (Packard, ST screen wrapped in Mylar film) with high- and low-activity standards (American Radiolabeled Chemicals) for 60 min. Screens are scanned with a Packard Cyclone phosphorimaging system and analyzed with OptiQuant Acquisition and Analysis software (Packard).

