It came to our attention after our manuscript was published that the caption of Table 1 was incomplete. We provide below the missing information, which is essential to the correct interpretation of the referred table.
a Species names and authors are as specified in the original text.
b Setation formulae of the first (P1), second (P2) and fourth (P4) swimming legs are summarized as follows: Re (inner setae; outer setae)/Ri (inner setae; outer setae), where Re: exopod, Ri: endopod. F: adult female; M: adult male; TL: total length (mm); Ur1 to Ur5: urosome segments; Fu: furca; CR: caudal rami. nd: no data.
* Character not explicitly stated in the original but taken from accompanying drawings for comparison purposes.
§ Most likely Crisafi (1959) described a late juvenile C5 as an adult male. In addition to the non-geniculated antennule, the urosome is 4-segmented with the last two segments fused (Fig. 3, p. 51 in Crisafi, 1959).
Citation
Cepeda GD, Sabatini ME, Scioscia CL, Ramírez FC, Viñas MD (2016) Corrigenda: Cepeda GD, Sabatini ME, Scioscia CL, Ramírez FC, Viñas MD (2016) On the uncertainty beneath the name Oithona similis Claus, 1866 (Copepoda, Cyclopoida). ZooKeys 552: 1–15. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.552.6083. ZooKeys 565: 147–148. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.565.8009